VA Claim Sharks: The Fee Rules, the Law, and How to Verify Anyone (2026)

Companies that are not accredited by the Department of Veterans Affairs routinely charge veterans thousands of dollars for disability claim help that federal law makes free or fee-regulated. Under and , only accredited attorneys and claims agents may charge a fee, and never for an initial claim; VSO representatives may never charge a fee at all.
Before paying anyone, it helps to know what you are working with. The free VA disability calculator estimates a combined rating and monthly payment using VA's own math, no email or phone number required.
Who can legally help with a VA claim
Federal law limits who may prepare, present, or prosecute a VA disability claim. Under and 5904 and , only three categories qualify: attorneys accredited by VA, claims agents accredited by VA, and representatives recognized by a Veterans Service Organization (VSO). Attorneys qualify through state bar membership plus VA-specific continuing education; claims agents must pass a written VA exam scoring 75% or higher.
VA's Office of General Counsel applies a broad test for when accreditation is required, regardless of pay. A service counts as practice before VA if it would have little or no value outside of VA's adjudication process for benefits claims. Gathering evidence for a specific claim, filling out VA forms for a specific veteran, and advising someone about their own case all cross that line, whatever the helper calls themselves.
The fee rules: when, and how much, someone can legally charge
Current law is unambiguous on one point: nobody may charge a veteran anything for help with an original, first-time disability claim. Under (c)(1)(i), an accredited attorney or claims agent may charge only for representation provided after VA's agency of original jurisdiction issues notice of an initial decision, meaning supplemental claims, higher-level reviews, and Board appeals filed after that first decision. Past-due benefits, sometimes called VA disability back pay, are the base a lawful fee is calculated against.

Under 38 CFR 14.636(f)(1), a fee that does not exceed 20% of past-due benefits is presumed reasonable; one exceeding 33 1/3% is presumed unreasonable, and the agent or attorney must show clear and convincing evidence to justify it. Agreements must be in writing and signed by both parties under 14.636(g), and a direct-pay agreement must be filed within 30 days. VSO representatives never charge a fee at all, by design. Veterans who want a sense of what a past-due award might total before any fee conversation can run the numbers with the free VA disability calculator, which shows a combined rating and 2026 monthly payment using VA's own combined-ratings math.
The federal enforcement gap: no crime, but real civil liability
Public Law 109-461 (2006) removed the criminal penalty once attached to unaccredited fee-charging, so an unaccredited company that charges a fee today faces no federal crime, only VA's accreditation-suspension process and whatever a state or private plaintiff can bring. Two bills that would restore criminal exposure, the GUARD VA Benefits Act (H.R. 1732) and the SAFEGUARD Veterans Act of 2026 (H.R. 9105 / S. 4646), remained in committee as of July 2026, with no floor vote scheduled. A competing bill, the CHOICE for Veterans Act (H.R. 3132), would legalize a paid pathway instead; it cleared committee in May 2025 but has not reached a floor vote.
With criminal liability off the table, civil liability has stepped in. A federal judge in the Middle District of North Carolina ruled on May 20, 2026, in a certified class action, that Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting violated federal law by charging fees for disability claims while unaccredited, in a case alleging the company collected more than $250 million in fees from veterans. In one example from the record, a veteran's monthly compensation rose by $377.92 after a claim the company helped with, and it billed her $1,880, roughly five times that increase.
State crackdowns: a fast-moving, contradictory landscape
State legislatures are moving faster than Congress, in both directions. New Jersey banned unaccredited fee-charging first, but that ban is now unsettled: in Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC v. Platkin, the Third Circuit vacated a denial of a preliminary injunction in April 2025, questioned whether the state can constitutionally bar veterans from paying for claims-related speech, and sent the case back for further fact-finding. Maine and New York passed similar bans.
California went further with SB 694, the Veterans Benefit Protection Act, signed February 10, 2026, effective January 1, 2027. It requires federal accreditation to prepare, present, or prosecute a claim, bans unauthorized fees, prohibits demanding a veteran's VA.gov login credentials or Common Access Card PIN, and lets veterans sue under the state's Consumer Legal Remedies Act.
Louisiana tried the opposite approach. Its 2024 PLUS Act let unaccredited, fee-charging consultants operate under a state licensing scheme instead of VA accreditation. A federal judge struck the law down entirely in February 2026, in Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. v. Landry, holding it preempted by federal law governing representation before VA and that a mandatory disclosure script it required violates the First Amendment as compelled speech.
The map keeps changing. More states enacted their own laws in 2026, including Virginia and Mississippi, and Mississippi followed Louisiana's permissive licensing model rather than a ban, so the rules a company operates under can differ sharply from one state to the next. Verifying accreditation directly with VA, described below, works the same everywhere.
Red flags that identify a claim shark
- Any fee, deposit, or processing charge for a first-time or initial disability claim
- A contract based on a percentage of future monthly compensation, not a one-time percentage of past-due benefits after a decision
- A request for your va.gov username, password, ID.me, or Login.gov credentials
- A guarantee of a specific rating percentage or dollar amount
- Marketing claiming accreditation is not necessary, or that VSOs and accredited attorneys will not fight as hard

How to verify anyone in two minutes
Before signing anything or sharing information, verify a representative's accreditation directly at va.gov/ogc/apps/accreditation. Search Individuals by last name for an attorney or claims agent, or search Organizations by name for a VSO; city, state, and zip narrow the results.
A match means the person or organization is currently accredited or recognized by VA. No match means they are not currently accredited, though an application could be pending. The database does not show suspension or debarment history, so if something feels off despite a listing, contact VA's Office of General Counsel directly. VA updates the list every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday evening.
Where to get legitimate help, for free
Real help is free, in three forms. County and state Veterans Service Officers and national VSOs such as the VFW, DAV, and American Legion assign an accredited representative at no cost, often through an entire appeal. Any attorney or claims agent confirmed through the accreditation search above can also represent a veteran, but only under the timing and percentage limits in 38 CFR 14.636. A veteran can also file directly at va.gov, no representative required.

If a claim is denied or rated lower than expected, the next step is a decision review, not a fee-based consultant. Our guide to how to appeal a VA rating walks through supplemental claims, higher-level review, and the Board of Veterans' Appeals, and our VA disability benefits hub covers ratings, dependents, and pay in full.
Disagree with your VA rating or decision? Talk to a VA-accredited attorney
If VA denied your claim or rated you lower than you expected, a VA-accredited attorney can review the decision for free. By federal law, accredited representatives may only charge a fee after VA issues an initial decision, usually a percentage of back pay if you win; federal rules presume a fee of 20% or less of past-due benefits to be reasonable. Filing an initial claim yourself is always free at va.gov. Submitting this form is a referral to an independent, VA-accredited attorney or firm, not representation by RecordingLaw.com.
This article provides general legal and consumer-protection information about VA disability claims assistance. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. RecordingLaw.com is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Filing a VA disability claim yourself is always free at va.gov. Legitimate help from a VSO representative should never cost anything, at any stage; help from a VA-accredited attorney or claims agent should never cost anything until after VA issues an initial decision on that claim. The laws and pending legislation described here were verified against primary sources as of July 2026 and may have changed since publication.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to charge me for my first VA disability claim?
Yes. Under 38 CFR 14.636(c)(1)(i), no one may charge a fee for an original, first-time claim. Fees are legal only after VA issues an initial decision, and only from an accredited attorney or claims agent.
What happens if I already paid an unaccredited company?
You have not broken any law, but the fee itself may be unlawful. Courts have held unaccredited companies liable for charging such fees, including a May 2026 North Carolina class-action ruling against Veterans Guardian.
How do I check if a VA representative is actually accredited?
Search their name or organization at va.gov/ogc/apps/accreditation. A match confirms current accreditation; no match means they are not currently accredited, though an application could be pending.
Are Veterans Service Organizations really free?
Yes. VSO representatives, such as those from the VFW, DAV, and American Legion, do not charge veterans a fee for claims help, including through an appeal.
Updates
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected three places where the article implied a VSO representative may lawfully charge a fee after an initial decision; 38 CFR 14.636(b) bars VSO representatives from ever receiving fees, at any stage, matching the article's own later statement that VSO representatives never charge a fee.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 38
§ 14.629Requirements for accreditation of service organization representatives; agents; and attorneys.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Service Organization Representatives. A recognized organization shall file with the Office of the General Counsel VA Form 21 (Application for Accreditation as Service Organization Representative) for each person it desires accredited as a representative of that organization. The form must be signed by the prospective representative and the organization's certifying official. For each of its accredited representatives, a recognized organization's certifying official shall complete, sign and file with the Office of the General Counsel, not later than five years after initial accreditation through that organization or the most recent recertification by that organization, VA Form 21 to certify that the representative continues to meet the criteria for accreditation specified in paragraph (a)(1), (2) and (3) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 25 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Robert v. Chisholm v. Robert A. McDonald (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2016, 28 Vet. App. 240) · Anderson v. West (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 1999, 12 Vet. App. 491) · Hezekiah Green, Jr. v. Robert A. McDonald (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2016, 28 Vet. App. 281)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: VA Disability Benefits (2026): Ratings, Pay Rates, and How Claims Work
§ 14.636Payment of fees for representation by agents and attorneys in proceedings before Agencies of Original Jurisdiction and before the Board of Veterans' Appeals.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Applicability of rule. The provisions of this section apply to the services of accredited agents and attorneys with respect to benefits under laws administered by VA in all proceedings before the agency of original jurisdiction or before the Board of Veterans' Appeals regardless of whether an appeal has been initiated. (b) Who may charge fees for representation. Only accredited agents and attorneys may receive fees from claimants or appellants for their services provided in connection with representation. Recognized organizations (including their accredited representatives when acting as such) and individuals recognized under § 14.630 of this part are not permitted to receive fees. An agent or attorney who may also be an accredited representative of a recognized organization may not receive such fees unless he or she has been properly designated as an agent or attorney in accordance with § 14.631 of this part in his or her individual capacity as an accredited agent or attorney. (c) Circumstances under which fees may be charged.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 51 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Mariella B. Mason v. Eric K. Shinseki (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2012, 26 Vet. App. 1) · Cameron v. McDonough (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2021, 1 F.4th 992) · Mark R. Lippman v. Eric K. Shinseki (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2009, 23 Vet. App. 243)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: 70% VA Disability Rating (2026): Monthly Pay and Benefits, 80% VA Disability Rating (2026): Monthly Pay and Benefits, How to Appeal a VA Rating Decision: The Three Review Lanes (2026)
United States Code Title 38
§ 5901Prohibition against acting as claims agent or attorneyIn force
Except as provided by section 500 of title 5, no individual may act as an agent or attorney in the preparation, presentation, or prosecution of any claim under laws administered by the Secretary unless such individual has been recognized for such purposes by the Secretary. The Secretary shall ensure that, each time a claimant under a law administered by the Secretary logs in to a website or online tool of the Department, such website or online tool issues to the claimant, in plain language— a warning about individuals who seek to act in violation of this chapter; a link to an online tool of the Department through which the claimant may report such an individual; a link to an online tool of the Department through which the claimant may search for a recognized agent, attorney, or other entity recognized by the Secretary for the preparation, presentation, or prosecution of any claim under laws administered by the Secretary; and a link to a website or an online tool of the Department providing final decisions on discipline of agents, attorneys, and entities, described in subparagraph (C), by the Secretary for violations of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 13 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Rashid El Malik v. James B. Peake (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 2008, 22 Vet. App. 183) · Treviño v. United States (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2014, 557 F. App'x 995) · R. Edward Bates, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2005, 398 F.3d 1355)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5904Recognition of agents and attorneys generallyIn force
Except as provided in paragraph (4), the Secretary may recognize any individual as an agent or attorney for the preparation, presentation, and prosecution of claims under laws administered by the Secretary. The Secretary shall prescribe in regulations (consistent with the Model Rules of Professional Conduct of the American Bar Association) qualifications and standards of conduct for individuals recognized under this section, including a requirement that, as a condition of being so recognized, an individual must— show that such individual is of good moral character and in good repute, is qualified to render claimants valuable service, and is otherwise competent to assist claimants in presenting claims; have such level of experience or specialized training as the Secretary shall specify; and certify to the Secretary that the individual has satisfied any qualifications and standards prescribed by the Secretary under this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 214 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Gisbrecht v. Barnhart (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 535 U.S. 789) · Scarborough v. Principi (Supreme Court of the United States 2004, 541 U.S. 401) · William M. Hanlin v. United States (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2003, 316 F.3d 1325)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 38 CFR 14.629, accreditation requirements for attorneys, claims agents, and VSO representatives (Cornell LII, current text)(law.cornell.edu)
- 38 CFR 14.636, fee agreements, timing, and reasonableness of fees for VA claims representation (Cornell LII, current text)(law.cornell.edu)
- 38 U.S.C. 5904, recognition of agents and attorneys and limits on fees for VA claims representation(law.cornell.edu)
- VA Office of General Counsel, Accreditation FAQs (the practice before VA test)(va.gov).gov
- VA Office of General Counsel, search for accredited attorneys, claims agents, and VSO representatives(va.gov).gov
- MOAA, status of the GUARD VA Benefits Act and SAFEGUARD Veterans Act of 2026 (June 2026)(moaa.org)
- Office of Governor Gavin Newsom, signing of California SB 694, the Veterans Benefit Protection Act(gov.ca.gov).gov
- The Volokh Conspiracy (Reason), analysis of Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting, LLC v. Platkin, No. 24-1097 (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025)(reason.com)
- VFW, federal court ruling striking down Louisiana's PLUS Act in Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. v. Landry (Feb. 2026)(vfw.org)
- Task & Purpose, Ford v. Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting summary judgment ruling (M.D.N.C., May 20, 2026)(taskandpurpose.com)