Minnesota
Minnesota Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get an OFP or HRO
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Minnesota, victims of domestic abuse can seek an Order for Protection (OFP) through district court, and any victim of harassment or stalking can seek a Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) with no relationship to the respondent required. A final OFP or HRO can last up to 2 years and up to 50 years in escalated circumstances.
If you are in immediate danger, call 911. For confidential help 24/7, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 (text START to 88788).
Types of restraining orders in Minnesota
Minnesota provides two separate civil protective order tracks, each governed by its own statute. The first is the Order for Protection (OFP), created under . An OFP addresses domestic abuse committed by a family or household member and can order the respondent to stop the abuse, vacate a shared home, stay away from the petitioner's home and workplace, and have no contact with the petitioner or minor children. The OFP process is handled in district court and carries specific firearm-surrender requirements when the respondent poses a credible threat.
The second track is the Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) under . An HRO addresses repeated intrusive or unwanted acts that cause a substantial adverse effect on the petitioner's safety, security, or privacy. This includes stalking, cyberstalking, and other patterns of harassment. Critically, an HRO requires no qualifying relationship between the petitioner and the respondent: any person who is the target of harassment may seek one. The HRO also covers some situations involving sexual assault. Choosing the right track depends on the relationship and the nature of the conduct; a domestic-violence advocate or court self-help center can help you decide.
Who can get a restraining order in Minnesota?
For an Order for Protection, the petitioner must have a qualifying relationship with the respondent. Minnesota's statute covers a broad range of domestic relationships, including:

- Current or former spouses
- Parents and children (biological or legal)
- Persons related by blood
- Current or former household members (cohabitants)
- Co-parents who share a child, regardless of whether they were ever married
- A pregnant person and the alleged father of the child
- Persons who have been in a "significant romantic or sexual relationship," which the court assesses by looking at the nature of the relationship, how often the parties spent time together, the length of the relationship, and how recently it ended
For a Harassment Restraining Order, no qualifying relationship is required. Any person who has experienced repeated unwanted acts that cause substantial distress to their safety, security, or privacy may petition the court for an HRO. This makes the HRO the appropriate route for victims of stalking or harassment by acquaintances, neighbors, coworkers, or strangers who do not qualify under the domestic-abuse statute.
How to file for a restraining order in Minnesota
Both OFP and HRO petitions are filed in Minnesota district court. You may file in the county where either party lives, where the abuse or harassment occurred, or where a related family court proceeding is pending. There is no residency requirement.
Filing is free when the allegations involve domestic abuse, stalking, or related criminal conduct. Minnesota law waives the filing fee in those circumstances, and the federal Violence Against Women Act separately prohibits courts from charging filing or service fees for domestic-violence protective orders.
To begin, you complete a petition form describing the abuse or harassment in your own words. Court self-help centers, located in most Minnesota district courthouses, provide the forms and can assist you in completing them. Many local domestic-violence programs also offer free advocates who can accompany you to court and help you explain your situation to the judge. Organizations such as Day One Minnesota (1-866-223-1111) connect callers with local services. After you submit your petition, a judge can issue an emergency order the same day if the facts show immediate danger.
Temporary vs. final orders: how long they last
When a judge reviews your petition and finds an immediate and present danger of domestic abuse, the court issues an ex parte temporary OFP without advance notice to the respondent. For an HRO, the court similarly issues an ex parte order if the petition establishes the harassment. The temporary order takes effect immediately and protects you while the case moves toward a full hearing. For an HRO, the respondent then has 20 days from the date of completed service to request a hearing; if no hearing is requested the order remains in effect.

| Order type | Temporary (ex parte) | Final order |
|---|---|---|
| Order for Protection (OFP) | Same day; hearing within 7 to 14 days of service on respondent | Up to 2 years; up to 50 years under escalation criteria |
| Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) | Same day; respondent has 20 days of service to request a hearing | Up to 2 years; up to 50 years under escalation criteria |
At the full hearing, the respondent has the right to appear and contest the petition. If the court finds sufficient grounds, it issues a final order. A final OFP or HRO typically lasts up to 2 years. However, under , an HRO may be extended for up to 50 years if the petitioner has had two or more previous HROs in effect against the same respondent, or if the respondent has violated a prior or existing HRO on two or more occasions. An OFP can also be extended for up to 50 years under Minnesota law in escalated circumstances. You can also return to court before the order expires to request a renewal.
Firearms and a Minnesota protective order
When a court issues an OFP that restrains the respondent from harassing, threatening, or contacting the petitioner, and the court determines that the respondent poses a credible threat to the petitioner's physical safety, the court must include a firearms prohibition in the order. The respondent then has 3 business days to transfer all firearms to a licensed firearms dealer, a law enforcement agency, or a qualified third party. If the court finds an imminent risk to safety, law enforcement may seize firearms immediately without waiting for the 3-day period.
A qualifying final OFP also triggers the federal firearm prohibition under (g)(8). Any person subject to a qualifying protective order may not possess firearms or ammunition under federal law, regardless of whether the state order separately addresses the issue.
The HRO does not carry a mandatory firearms-surrender provision. However, possessing a dangerous weapon during a violation of an HRO is an aggravating factor that can increase the criminal penalty significantly.
In 2023, Minnesota enacted a red-flag law (Extreme Risk Protection Order, ) that allows law enforcement or family members to seek a separate court order for firearms surrender based on a credible threat of harm, even outside the OFP or HRO process.
What happens if someone violates the order?
Violating an OFP is a criminal offense in Minnesota. A first violation is a misdemeanor carrying up to 90 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,000, with a mandatory minimum jail sentence of 3 days. If the respondent has a prior qualified domestic-violence conviction within the preceding 10 years, the charge elevates to a gross misdemeanor. A violation becomes a felony carrying up to 5 years in prison and a $10,000 fine if the respondent has committed two or more prior violations or possesses a weapon during the violation.

Violating an HRO also starts as a misdemeanor and can escalate to a gross misdemeanor within 10 years of a prior domestic-violence conviction. If the respondent possesses a weapon during the violation, or has two or more prior qualified domestic-violence-related offense convictions within the past ten years, the charge becomes a felony.
Law enforcement officers in Minnesota can arrest a respondent without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe the person violated a protective order. If the respondent contacts you, comes to your home or workplace, or otherwise violates the terms of your order, call 911 immediately and report the violation to the court as well. Documenting each incident carefully, including dates, times, and any messages or witnesses, helps prosecutors build a stronger case.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and it is not a safety plan. Protective-order rules vary by state and change. If you are in danger, call 911. For help with your specific situation, contact your local court's self-help center, a domestic-violence advocate, or a licensed attorney.
For an overview of how protective orders work across all 50 states, visit our guide to restraining order laws by state.
Minnesota's recording-consent law may be relevant if you are documenting harassment or abuse. See our Minnesota recording law page for details.
More Minnesota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I get a restraining order in Minnesota?
File a petition at your local Minnesota district court. You can file in the county where you live, where the other person lives, or where the abuse or harassment took place. For domestic abuse, request an Order for Protection (OFP) under Minn. Stat. 518B.01. For stalking or harassment by anyone, request a Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) under Minn. Stat. 609.748. A judge can issue a same-day temporary order if there is immediate danger. Court self-help centers and local domestic-violence programs provide free assistance with the forms.
How long does a restraining order last in Minnesota?
A final OFP or HRO typically lasts up to 2 years. Under Minn. Stat. 609.748, an HRO may be extended to up to 50 years if the petitioner has had two or more previous HROs in effect against the same respondent, or the respondent has violated a prior or existing HRO on two or more occasions; an OFP can also be extended up to 50 years in escalated circumstances. You can return to court before the order expires to request a renewal.
How much does a restraining order cost in Minnesota?
Filing an OFP or HRO is free when the allegations involve domestic abuse, stalking, or related criminal conduct. Minnesota waives the filing fee in those cases, and the federal Violence Against Women Act prohibits courts from charging filing or service fees for domestic-violence protective orders.
Can I get a restraining order without a police report?
Yes. You do not need a police report to file an OFP or HRO in Minnesota. The petition is based on your own description of the abuse or harassment. However, police reports, photos, medical records, or other documentation can strengthen your case at the hearing.
Does a restraining order take away gun rights in Minnesota?
Yes, when an OFP restrains threatening or harassing conduct and the court finds the respondent poses a credible threat, the court must prohibit firearm possession and require the respondent to transfer all firearms within 3 business days. A qualifying final OFP also triggers the federal firearms ban under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8). An HRO does not carry a mandatory surrender provision, but possessing a weapon during a violation is a felony aggravating factor.
What happens if the respondent violates the order?
Violating an OFP or HRO is a criminal offense. A first violation is a misdemeanor with a mandatory minimum of 3 days in jail (for OFP violations). Repeat violations or possession of a weapon during a violation can be charged as a felony. Police can arrest without a warrant on probable cause. Call 911 immediately if the respondent violates the order, and report it to the court.
What is the difference between an OFP and an HRO in Minnesota?
An Order for Protection (OFP) is for victims of domestic abuse who have a qualifying relationship with the respondent, such as a spouse, former partner, co-parent, or household member. A Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) is for victims of repeated harassment or stalking and requires no relationship at all. Both can last up to 2 years and carry criminal penalties for violation.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected three misattributed Minnesota citations: the HRO's 50-year escalation trigger and felony-violation trigger were misdescribed as based on prior OFPs/HRO-violations rather than the statute's actual triggers (prior HROs and qualified domestic-violence-offense convictions), and the Extreme Risk Protection Order citation was reattributed from Minn. Stat. 624.7178 (a liability-immunity section) to 624.7171 (the actual ERPO petition-eligibility statute, verified at revisor.mn.gov).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 518B: DOMESTIC ABUSE
§ 518B.01DOMESTIC ABUSE ACTIn force
Subdivision 1. Short title. This section may be cited as the "Domestic Abuse Act." Subd. 2. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms have the meanings given: (a) "Domestic abuse" means the following, if committed against a family or household member by a family or household member: (1) physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; (2) the infliction of fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; or (3) terroristic threats, within the meaning of section 609.713, subdivision 1; criminal sexual conduct, within the meaning of section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or 609.3451; sexual extortion within the meaning of section 609.3458; or interference with an emergency call within the meaning of section 609.78, subdivision 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 212 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Burkstrand v. Burkstrand (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2001, 632 N.W.2d 206)“…e frames prescribed by the Domestic Abuse Act, specifically Minn.Stat. § 518B.01, subdivision 7(c) (2000), divests the d…”
- State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2014, 848 N.W.2d 528)“…12), and violating an order for protection, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 14(d)(1) (2012). A jury returne…”
- State v. Colvin (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2002, 645 N.W.2d 449)“…ed for and obtained an emergency (ex parte) OFP pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518B.01 (2000), against her ex-husband, Peter C…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 609: CRIMINAL CODE
§ 609.748HARASSMENT; RESTRAINING ORDERIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Definition. For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them in this subdivision. (a) "Harassment" includes: (1) a single incident of physical or sexual assault, a single incident of harassment under section 609.749, subdivision 2, paragraph (c), clause (8), a single incident of nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images under section 617.261, or repeated incidents of intrusive or unwanted acts, words, or gestures that have a substantial adverse effect or are intended to have a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of another, regardless of the relationship between the actor and the intended target; (2) targeted residential picketing; and (3) a pattern of attending public events after being notified that the actor's presence at the event is harassing to another. (b) "Respondent" includes any adults or juveniles alleged to have engaged in harassment or organizations alleged to have sponsored or promoted harassment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 97 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Dunham v. Roer (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2006, 708 N.W.2d 552)“…ng appellant’s claims (a) that the harassment definition in Minn.Stat. § 609.748, subd. 1(a)(1) (harassment statute) is…”
- Kush v. Mathison (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2004, 683 N.W.2d 841)“…effect on the safety, security or privacy of another.... ” Minn.Stat. § 609.748, subd. 1(a)(1) (2002). But inappropriat…”
- State v. Gunderson (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2012, 812 N.W.2d 156)“…as charged with gross-misdemeanor violation of an HRO under Minn.Stat. § 609.748, subd. 6(c) (2008), and felony violatio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Minnesota GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 624: CRIMES; FIREWORKS; FIREARMS
§ 624.7171EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERSIn force
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) As used in sections 624.7171 to 624.7178, the following terms have the meanings given. (b) "Family or household members" means: (1) spouses and former spouses of the respondent; (2) parents and children of the respondent; (3) persons who are presently residing with the respondent; or (4) a person involved in a significant romantic or sexual relationship with the respondent. In determining whether persons are in a significant romantic or sexual relationship under clause (4), the court shall consider the length of time of the relationship; type of relationship; and frequency of interaction between the parties. (c) "Firearm" has the meaning given in section 609.666, subdivision 1, paragraph (a). (d) "Mental health professional" has the meaning given in section 245I.02, subdivision 27. Subd. 2. Court jurisdiction. (a) An application for relief under sections 624.7172 and 624.7174 may be filed in the county of residence of the respondent except as provided for in paragraph (b). Actions under sections 624.7172 and 624.7174 shall be given docket priorities by the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 922Unlawful actsIn forcecited in 61 of our articles
It shall be unlawful— for any person— except a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer, to engage in the business of importing, manufacturing, or dealing in firearms, or in the course of such business to ship, transport, or receive any firearm in interstate or foreign commerce; or except a licensed importer or licensed manufacturer, to engage in the business of importing or manufacturing ammunition, or in the course of such business, to ship, transport, or receive any ammunition in interstate or foreign commerce; for any importer, manufacturer, dealer, or collector licensed under the provisions of this chapter to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm to any person other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, except that— this paragraph and subsection (b)(3) shall not be held to preclude a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector from returning a firearm or replacement firearm of the same kind and type to a person from whom it was received; and this paragraph shall not be held to preclude an individual from mailing a firearm owned in compliance…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 40,024 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Section 922(g)(1) bars a felon from possessing a firearm, and the Supreme Court cases in this line turn on sentencing, not on the ban. Taylor v. United States (1990) and Shepard v. United States (2005) held that whether prior convictions enhance a 922(g) sentence under 924(e) is decided from offense elements and limited plea records.
Leading cases:
- United States v. Booker (Supreme Court of the United States 2004, 543 U.S. 220)“…e Johnson with one crime (say, illegal gun possession, see 18 U. S. C. § 922 (g)) and Jackson with another (say, ban…”
- Almendarez-Torres v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1998, 523 U.S. 224)“…cidivism an offense element in such circumstances. But cf. 18 U. S. C. § 922 (g)(1) (prior felony conviction an elem…”
- Taylor v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1990, 495 U.S. 575)✓Taylor pleaded guilty to felon-in-possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and had two Missouri burglary convictions; the Court held that 'burglary' in the § 924(e) enhancement attached to a § 922(g) conviction means generic burglary judged by the prior statute's elements.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can You Become an ICE Agent with a Criminal Record? (2026 Guide), How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), Supreme Court Limits the Federal Gun Ban on Marijuana Users (Hemani, 2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Minn. Stat. 518B.01 - Order for Protection(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 609.748 - Harassment Restraining Order(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 624.7171 - Extreme Risk Protection Order (petition eligibility)(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Judicial Branch - Order for Protection(mncourts.gov).gov
- Minnesota Judicial Branch - Harassment Restraining Order(mncourts.gov).gov