Hawaii
Hawaii Drone Laws 2026: Trespass, Privacy & Warrants

Hawaii makes it a crime to fly a drone within 50 feet of someone's home to harass them, and a separate felony to use one to record a person in a private place. Neither statute requires police to get a warrant first; that question is left to the state and federal constitutions.
This page covers Hawaii's drone-trespass statute, its general privacy statutes as they apply to drones, the state of law-enforcement warrant requirements, and the federal ban on shooting down a drone. It does not cover FAA flight-operation rules like registration or Remote ID, which apply the same way nationwide. For camera-based surveillance generally, see Recording Law's surveillance camera laws guide; for how other states handle drones, see the Drone Laws hub.
Who regulates drones in Hawaii: the federal and state split
The FAA owns Hawaii's airspace: altitude, registration, commercial pilot certification under 14 CFR Part 107, and Remote ID. A federal district court made that division explicit when it struck down a Massachusetts city's own altitude and registration rules in Singer v. City of Newton, 284 F. Supp. 3d 125 (D. Mass. 2017). States retain authority over conduct: what a drone operator records, and whether a drone may approach a dwelling. Hawaii's legislature acted on that authority relatively recently, telling lawmakers in 2023 that "Hawaii's laws do not adequately address" drone-specific privacy and safety concerns before passing the state's first dedicated drone statute, HRS § 711-1114.

Can someone fly a drone over your property in Hawaii and film you?
Two statutes work together here, and neither one is limited to drones alone. HRS § 711-1114, Hawaii's trespass-with-an-unmanned-aircraft-system law, makes it a misdemeanor to intentionally cause a drone to cross a property line and come within 50 feet of a dwelling either to coerce, intimidate, or harass another person, or, after the operator has been given actual notice to desist, for any other reason at all. It is a defense that the person with legal authority over the property consented to the flight, or that the operator was flying under federal authorization in an otherwise lawful, federally compliant manner.
Beyond the 50-foot trespass line, Hawaii's general privacy statutes apply to a drone the same way they would apply to a person with a handheld camera. HRS § 711-1111, violation of privacy in the second degree, makes it unlawful to install or use a device, including a drone, to observe, record, or broadcast someone in a private place without their consent. A private place is defined as somewhere a person may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion. A basic violation is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,000 fine, but the offense becomes a felony if the recording shows the person nude or engaged in sexual activity.
That more serious conduct is separately covered by HRS § 711-1110.9, violation of privacy in the first degree, a class C felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. It reaches both the act of secretly recording someone nude or during sexual activity and the malicious disclosure of an intimate image without consent. A person harmed under either privacy statute can also sue civilly, with statutory damages of at least $10,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater, plus punitive damages and attorney's fees.
Before Act 58 passed in 2023, Hawaii had no statute addressing this fact pattern directly. In August 2018, a drone hovered for an extended period outside a resident's window at Kukui Plaza in downtown Honolulu; the resident, who had a young child and often kept her windows open, called it "an invasion of privacy," and Honolulu Police Deputy Chief John McCarthy publicly acknowledged the conduct looked suspicious but said state law gave officers little to work with beyond ordinary trespass and voyeurism statutes. That gap is close to what the legislature cited five years later when it created § 711-1114.
Does police need a warrant to fly a drone over your property in Hawaii?
Hawaii has not enacted a statute that specifically requires a warrant before a law enforcement agency uses a drone. A 2016 bill, SB 2347, would have created one, but it did not advance out of committee. Absent a dedicated statute, the baseline is ordinary constitutional search-and-seizure law: the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution, which Hawaii courts have at times read to protect privacy interests more broadly than federal case law does. Under that framework, police generally need a warrant based on probable cause before a drone flight rises to the level of a "search," such as hovering to observe inside the curtilage of a home, subject to recognized exceptions for emergencies, search and rescue, and similar exigent circumstances.
That statutory gap has become a live issue rather than an abstract one. As of early 2026, the Honolulu Police Department was preparing to launch a drone-as-first-responder pilot program centered on Waikiki, with a launch pad planned atop a hotel and deployment targeted for March 2026. A 2025 law, HB 550, lets drone video establish probable cause for an arrest in one narrow context, fireworks violations captured over public property, but does not create a general drone-warrant rule. Members of the Waikiki Neighborhood Board and the ACLU of Hawaii have both raised concerns about the program, warning that continuous aerial monitoring without a dedicated statutory warrant requirement risks becoming, in the ACLU's words, "pervasive, suspicionless, mass aerial surveillance."
A niche restriction: drones and Hawaii's marine waters
Hawaii bans using a drone to fish. HRS § 188-23.5 makes it unlawful to possess or use a drone on, in, or near state marine waters for the purpose of taking aquatic life, unless the operator first obtains a permit from the Department of Land and Natural Resources; the statute allows a drone to be used for simple reconnaissance without a permit. A violation is a misdemeanor, and DLNR's Division of Conservation and Resources Enforcement actively enforces it. In April 2025, officers arrested a Kihei man at Keawakapu Beach on Maui after finding him fishing with a drone and, in the course of that stop, discovered marijuana, hashish, and drug paraphernalia, adding narcotics charges to the drone-fishing citation.
Can you legally shoot down a drone over your Hawaii property?
No. Federal law makes it a serious felony to shoot down, disable, or otherwise damage any drone, anywhere, including over the shooter's own property, because the FAA controls the national airspace rather than the landowner below it. 18 U.S.C. § 32, the Aircraft Sabotage Act, criminalizes willfully damaging or destroying an "aircraft," a category the FAA has treated drones as falling into since 2012, and a conviction carries up to 20 years in federal prison. No state, including Hawaii, has passed a law giving a property owner the right to disable a drone as a matter of self-help; publicized cases from other states where local prosecutors dropped or reduced state charges after a shoot-down are not evidence that doing so is legal.
This article provides general legal information about Hawaii's drone-related laws as of mid-2026. It is not legal advice. For a specific dispute, consult a Hawaii attorney or the appropriate law enforcement agency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my neighbor fly a drone close to my house in Hawaii?
Not if it comes within 50 feet of your dwelling to coerce, intimidate, or harass you, or if it does so after you have told the operator to stop. HRS § 711-1114 makes that a misdemeanor, regardless of the operator's reason for the flight after notice to desist has been given.
Is it illegal to use a drone to record someone in Hawaii?
Yes, if the person is in a private place and has not consented. HRS § 711-1111 makes that a misdemeanor, or a felony if the recording shows the person nude or engaged in sexual activity, in which case HRS § 711-1110.9 applies instead.
Does Hawaii police need a warrant to fly a drone over my property?
Hawaii has no statute that specifically requires one. A 2016 bill that would have created a drone-warrant rule did not pass, so ordinary Fourth Amendment and Hawaii constitutional search-and-seizure law applies instead.
Can I sue someone who filmed me with a drone in Hawaii?
Yes. A person harmed by a violation of Hawaii's privacy statutes can bring a civil claim with statutory damages of at least $10,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater, plus punitive damages and attorney's fees.
Is drone fishing legal in Hawaii?
Not without a permit. HRS § 188-23.5 bans using a drone to take aquatic life in or near Hawaii's state marine waters unless the operator has a permit from the Department of Land and Natural Resources, though simple reconnaissance flights are allowed.
Can I shoot down a drone flying over my property in Hawaii?
No. Shooting down any drone is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 32 no matter whose property it is over, because federal law controls the national airspace rather than the landowner below it.
Sources and References
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 711-1114, Trespass with an unmanned aircraft system (added by Act 58, Session Laws of Hawaii 2023)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 711-1110.9, Violation of privacy in the first degree(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 188-23.5, Possession or use of unmanned aerial vehicles on, in, or near state marine waters prohibited; exception(dlnr.hawaii.gov).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Hawaii recording law guide (HRS §§ 711-1111, 711-1110.9 privacy statutes)(rcfp.org)
- Honolulu Civil Beat, "A New Era Of Police Surveillance Is Coming To Hawai'i" (Waikiki drone-as-first-responder program)(civilbeat.org)
- Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, "Maui Fisher Busted for Drone and Narcotics Violations" (April 4, 2025)(dlnr.hawaii.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 32, Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities (federal shoot-down prohibition)(law.cornell.edu)
- Singer v. City of Newton, 284 F. Supp. 3d 125 (D. Mass. 2017)(leagle.com)