Louisiana
Louisiana Child Custody Laws (2026): Joint Custody, Domiciliary Parent, and Best Interests
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Louisiana courts decide child custody based on the best interests of the child under Civil Code Art. 134. Louisiana has a rebuttable statutory presumption of joint custody: Civil Code Art. 132 directs courts to award joint custody unless clear and convincing evidence shows sole custody is in the child's best interest.
How does Louisiana decide child custody?
Louisiana courts decide custody using the best interests of the child standard, rooted in Civil Code Art. 131. Civil Code Art. 134 enumerates the factors courts must weigh, and the primary (threshold) consideration is the potential for child abuse. The district court in the parish where the child resides handles custody matters; family courts exist in some parishes and take over these cases.
Beyond the primary abuse factor, Art. 134 directs courts to evaluate the emotional bonds between the child and each parent, each parent's capacity to provide love, guidance, and education, each parent's ability to meet the child's material needs, the stability of the current environment, and the permanence of proposed custody arrangements, among other factors. Courts may appoint a curator or guardian to represent the child and may order evaluations by mental health professionals. Louisiana has adopted the UCCJEA at R.S. 13:1801 and following, so Louisiana courts exercise jurisdiction when Louisiana is the child's home state for the prior six months.
Types of custody in Louisiana
Louisiana uses the terms legal custody and physical custody, though in practice the most important structural concept is the domiciliary parent designation. In any joint custody arrangement, R.S. 9:335 requires the court to enter an implementation order that identifies a domiciliary parent, meaning the parent with whom the child primarily resides.

The domiciliary parent has authority to make all routine, day-to-day decisions affecting the child without consulting the other parent, and the domiciliary parent's major decisions are rebuttably presumed to be in the child's best interest unless the other parent proves otherwise. The non-domiciliary parent retains rights to information about the child and the right to participate in major decisions about education, health care, and similar matters, either by agreement in the implementation order or through judicial allocation. Sole custody may also be awarded, placing all authority and residence with one parent, but it requires clear and convincing evidence that joint custody is not in the child's best interest.
Does Louisiana presume joint or 50/50 custody?
Louisiana has a rebuttable statutory presumption of joint custody, but it is not a presumption of equal or 50/50 parenting time. Civil Code Art. 132 states that, absent a custody agreement, the court "shall award custody to the parents jointly" unless one parent proves by clear and convincing evidence that sole custody with one parent is in the child's best interest. That is a high bar, so joint custody is the strong default outcome.
Historically, joint custody in Louisiana did not automatically mean equal time. That changed with Act 605 of the 2026 Regular Session. Effective August 1, 2026, Act 605 amended R.S. 9:335(A)(2)(b) to provide that physical custody of the child shall be shared equally between the parents, replacing prior language that it should be shared equally to the extent feasible. For custody proceedings filed or heard on or after August 1, 2026, that change creates a strengthened, rebuttable presumption of equal (50/50) physical custody. The equal-sharing default still yields where a court finds that equal physical custody is not feasible or not in the child's best interest, and the best-interest standard under Civil Code Art. 131 and Art. 134 remains the overriding test. Act 605 does not automatically reopen or modify custody orders already in place before its effective date. R.S. 9:364 continues to carve out abuse and domestic violence: where a court finds a parent has a history of family violence or domestic abuse against any family or household member, not only the child, has sexually abused a child, stepchild, or household member, or has willingly permitted such abuse by another, a rebuttable presumption arises that custody by that parent is not in the child's best interest.
The best-interests factors Louisiana courts weigh
Civil Code Art. 134 lists 14 factors, with potential for child abuse identified as the primary (threshold) consideration:
- Potential for child abuse by either parent or any other person living in the home.
- The love, affection, and emotional bonds between the child and each parent.
- Each parent's capacity and disposition to give the child love, affection, and spiritual guidance, and to continue the child's education and rearing.
- Each parent's capacity to provide the child with material needs (food, clothing, medical care).
- The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity.
- The permanence, as a family unit, of the proposed custodial home or homes.
- The moral fitness of each party, insofar as it affects the welfare of the child.
- Each party's history of drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, or history of family violence.
- The mental and physical health of each party.
- The child's home, school, and community record.
- The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient age to express a preference.
- Each parent's willingness and ability to facilitate and encourage a close relationship between the child and the other parent.
- The distance between the residences of the parties.
- The responsibility for the care and rearing of the child previously exercised by each party.
Courts weigh all factors together; no single factor other than the abuse threshold is automatically dispositive.
Relocation: moving with your child in Louisiana
Louisiana's relocation statute, R.S. 9:355.1 and following, applies to a proposed relocation, defined as a change in the child's principal residence for 60 days or more, only when R.S. 9:355.2's distance threshold is met: any move outside Louisiana, or an in-state move of more than 75 miles from the relevant reference point (the other parent's domicile if there is no custody order, or the child's principal residence under the most recent custody decree). Within that scope, the parent proposing to relocate must provide written notice by certified mail. The non-domiciliary parent then has 30 days from receipt of the notice to object in writing. If an objection is filed, the court schedules a best-interests hearing before the relocation occurs. A shorter in-state move, under 75 miles, is not subject to this notice-and-objection procedure.

At the hearing, the relocating parent must show that the proposed move is in good faith and that a modified custody arrangement can still serve the child's best interests. Courts consider the reasons for the move, the quality of the child's relationship with each parent, the impact on the child's education and social ties, the feasibility of maintaining a meaningful relationship with the non-relocating parent through an adjusted schedule, and any history of domestic violence. Where the parents have equal physical custody under the implementation order, both parents must agree to any relocation or obtain court approval before the move takes place.
Changing a custody order in Louisiana (modification)
Louisiana does not enumerate a statutory definition of "material change in circumstances," but courts apply a well-established case-law standard: the parent seeking modification must show (1) a material change in circumstances has occurred since the prior order was entered, and (2) the modification sought is in the child's best interests under the Art. 134 factors.
Courts do not reopen orders simply because one parent is unhappy with the existing schedule. Changes in the child's needs as the child grows, a parent's relocation, a significant change in a parent's work schedule or health, or a substantial change in the child's living environment can each constitute a material change. The domiciliary parent designation can also be modified if circumstances warrant. If child support is tied to the custody arrangement, see Louisiana child support laws for the parallel modification standard.
If you are facing a custody case in Louisiana
Louisiana's joint-custody presumption means most cases start with the expectation that both parents will share legal authority and that the court will divide parenting time through an implementation order. Here is what helps:
Propose a detailed parenting plan and implementation order. Courts expect the parties or their attorneys to submit proposed schedules covering regular time, holidays, school breaks, and how decision-making disputes will be resolved. A concrete, child-centered proposal demonstrates cooperation.
Document your caregiving history. Art. 134 factor 14 asks courts to evaluate each parent's prior responsibility for the child's day-to-day care. Records of school involvement, medical appointments, and daily routines matter.
Understand the domiciliary parent concept. If joint custody is ordered, the implementation order determines which parent has primary residence authority. Negotiating this carefully can avoid future conflict over routine decisions.
Address domestic violence proactively. R.S. 9:364's abuse presumption is significant and is not limited to abuse of the child; it also covers family violence or domestic abuse against the other parent or another household member. If there is a history of abuse, protective orders, or child-abuse findings, both sides should get legal advice immediately, since these facts can shift the presumption entirely.
Finally, consult a licensed Louisiana family-law attorney. Joint custody is presumed, but crafting an implementation order that truly fits your child's schedule, school, and needs requires someone who knows your local district court's practices.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Child custody law varies by state and turns on the specific facts of each family. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed family-law attorney in Louisiana.
Related
- Child Custody Laws by State (Hub)
- Louisiana Child Support Laws
- Louisiana Alimony Laws
- Louisiana Emancipation Laws

More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How is child custody determined in Louisiana?
Louisiana applies the best interests of the child standard under Civil Code Art. 131-134. The court presumes joint custody is best (Art. 132) and then enters an implementation order designating a domiciliary parent and setting the parenting-time schedule. Fourteen statutory factors guide the analysis, with potential for child abuse as the primary consideration.
Is Louisiana a 50/50 custody state?
Louisiana presumes joint custody, and, following Act 605 of the 2026 Regular Session, R.S. 9:335(A)(2)(b) now provides that physical custody shall be shared equally in a joint custody implementation order for proceedings filed or heard on or after August 1, 2026, unless the court finds equal sharing is not feasible or not in the child's best interest. That is a strengthened, rebuttable presumption of equal time, not an absolute rule, and the best-interest standard under Civil Code Art. 131 and Art. 134 still governs the outcome.
Does Louisiana favor the mother in custody cases?
No. Louisiana custody law is gender-neutral under Civil Code Art. 131 and following. The old tender-years doctrine that favored mothers has been abolished. Both parents receive equal consideration, and the joint-custody presumption applies regardless of which parent is the mother or father.
What is a domiciliary parent in Louisiana?
A domiciliary parent is the parent designated in a joint custody implementation order as the child's primary residence parent. Under R.S. 9:335, the domiciliary parent has authority to make routine day-to-day decisions for the child, and their major decisions are rebuttably presumed to be in the child's best interest unless the other parent proves otherwise.
At what age can a child choose which parent to live with in Louisiana?
Louisiana has no fixed age at which a child's preference is automatically followed. Civil Code Art. 134 includes the child's reasonable preference as one of 14 best-interests factors, to be weighed based on the child's age and maturity. A judge considers the preference but is not required to follow it.
How do I change a custody order in Louisiana?
You must show a material change in circumstances since the prior order and that the requested modification is in the child's best interests. Louisiana courts apply a case-law standard; there is no enumerated statutory definition of 'material change.' Relocation, a major shift in a parent's health or work schedule, or a change in the child's needs can qualify.
Can a parent move away with the child in Louisiana?
It depends on the distance. The relocation process under R.S. 9:355.1 and following applies only to a move outside Louisiana, or an in-state move of more than 75 miles from the other parent's domicile or the child's principal residence under the custody decree (R.S. 9:355.2). Within that scope, the relocating parent must give certified-mail written notice before changing the child's principal residence for 60 or more days, the other parent has 30 days to object, and a court hearing is required before the move can proceed if an objection is filed. A shorter in-state move is not subject to this notice-and-objection procedure.
Talk to a Louisiana family-law attorney: free case review
Every case has details a formula cannot capture. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Louisiana family-law attorney.
Updates
Repointed all four citation URLs, which had collapsed onto a single Civil Code Article 134 page, to their correct individual statute pages. Added the R.S. 9:355.2 distance threshold (an out-of-state move of any distance, or an in-state move of more than 75 miles) that determines whether Louisiana's relocation notice-and-objection procedure applies at all. Broadened the R.S. 9:364 abuse-presumption description, which had been narrowed to abuse of the child, to reflect that family violence or domestic abuse against any family or household member also triggers the presumption.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the Civil Code Art. 134 best-interests factor count from 13 to the statute's actual 14: the article had merged the child's home/school/community-history factor and the child's-preference factor into a single item, which also mislabeled every factor after it.
Restated factor 3 as Civil Code Article 134(A)(3) words it: love, affection, spiritual guidance, and continuing the child's education and rearing.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Civil Code
§ 131Court to determine custodyIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
In a proceeding for divorce or thereafter, the court shall award custody of a child in accordance with the best interest of the child.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 98 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Hawthorne v. Hawthorne (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1996, 676 So. 2d 619)“…a child in accordance with the best interest of the child. La.Civ.Code art. 131. The best interest of the child is the…”
- Fernandez v. Pizzalato (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2005, 902 So. 2d 1112)“…her a transcript or anyone else present in the meetings." La. Civil Code art. 131 provides that a court shall award custo…”
- Long v. Dossett (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1999, 732 So. 2d 773)“…novo review when it found that the trial court misapplied La. Civ.Code art. 131. The trial court made its analysis unde…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Divorce Laws (2026): Grounds, Residency, and Process, Louisiana Act 605 Makes Equal 50/50 Custody the Default Standard
§ 132Award of custody to parentsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
If the parents agree who is to have custody, the court shall award custody in accordance with their agreement unless the provisions of R.S. 9:364 apply or the best interest of the child requires a different award. Subject to the provisions of R.S. 9:364, in the absence of agreement, or if the agreement is not in the best interest of the child, the court shall award custody to the parents jointly; however, if custody in one parent is shown by clear and convincing evidence to serve the best interest of the child, the court shall award custody to that parent.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cross-referenced in the statute itself: § 9:364
Cited in 37 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Griffith v. Latiolais (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2010, 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 0824)“…y between the parents. However, that mandate is tempered by La.Civ.Code art. 132, which provides that “if custody in one…”
- D.R.S. v. L.E.K. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2010, 33 So. 3d 428)“…is in the best interest of the minor child as required by La.Civ.Code art. 132. The trial court provided lengthy Rea…”
- Drs v. Lek (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2010, 33 So. 3d 428)“…is in the best interest of the minor child as required by La.Civ.Code art. 132. The trial court provided lengthy Rea…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 134Factors in determining child's best interestIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. Except as provided in Paragraph B of this Article, the court shall consider all relevant factors in determining the best interest of the child, including: (1) The potential for the child to be abused, as defined by Children's Code Article 603, which shall be the primary consideration. (2) The love, affection, and other emotional ties between each party and the child. (3) The capacity and disposition of each party to give the child love, affection, and spiritual guidance and to continue the education and rearing of the child. (4) The capacity and disposition of each party to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care, and other material needs. (5) The length of time the child has lived in a stable, adequate environment, and the desirability of maintaining continuity of that environment. (6) The permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed custodial home or homes. (7) The moral fitness of each party, insofar as it affects the welfare of the child. (8) The history of substance abuse, violence, or criminal activity of any party. (9) The mental and physical health of each party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 119 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Hawthorne v. Hawthorne (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1996, 676 So. 2d 619)“…Article 131(A)." [1] La.Civ.Code art. 132, Comment (b). La.Civ.Code art. 134 states that the court shall consider al…”
- Miller v. Miller (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2001, 799 So. 2d 753)“…Consideration of the Factors of La.R.S. 9:355.12 and La.Civ.Code art. 134 Peggy asserts that the trial court co…”
- Harvey v. Harvey (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2013, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 81)“…rearing of the child previously exercised by each party. La.Civ.Code art. 134. In its reasons for judgment, the tri…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 13:1801Short titleIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
This Part may be cited as the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 37 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- Marsalis v. Marsalis (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2010, 10 La.App. 3 Cir. 592)“…rm Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), La.R.S. 13:1801, et seq., due to similar proceedings…”
- Hiser v. Fell (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2014, 153 So. 3d 1177)“…Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UC-CJEA”), La. R.S. 13:1801, et seq., and the Enforcement of Fore…”
- Marshall v. Cornwall (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2013, 13 La.App. 5 Cir. 62)“…the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, La. R.S. 13:1801 et seq., the State of Florida had con…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9:335Joint custody decree and implementation order; custody during an emergency or disasterIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A.(1) In a proceeding in which joint custody is decreed, the court shall render a joint custody implementation order except for good cause shown. (2)(a) The implementation order shall allocate the time periods during which each parent shall have physical custody of the child so that the child is assured of frequent and continuing contact with both parents. (b) To the extent it is feasible and in the best interest of the child, physical custody of the children should be shared equally. (c) The implementation order shall include a provision that when either party is required to evacuate this state with a minor child because of an emergency or disaster declared under the provisions of R.S. 29:721 et seq., or declared by federal authority and it becomes impossible for the parties to exercise custody as provided in the judgment, the parties shall engage in continuous communication regarding the safe evacuation of the child, the location of the child during and after the emergency or disaster, and an interim custody plan for the child until the custody provisions of the judgment can be resumed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 206 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Evans v. Lungrin (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1998, 708 So. 2d 731)“…mother's custody period. Mr. Evans urges that pursuant to La. R.S. 9:335, a domiciliary parent is the parent wi…”
- Tracie F. v. Francisco D. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2016, 188 So. 3d 231)“…ry parent applies only to joint custody arrangements. See La. R.S. 9:335. Therefore, if Kathy were to be exclude…”
- Guillot v. Munn (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2000, 756 So. 2d 290)“…99), 735 So.2d 619, 621 . When joint custody is decreed, La. R.S. 9:335(A) provides that the court's implementa…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9:355.1DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this Subpart: (1) "Principal residence of a child" means: (a) The location designated by a court to be the primary residence of the child. (b) In the absence of a court order, the location at which the parties have expressly agreed that the child will primarily reside. (c) In the absence of a court order or an express agreement, the location, if any, at which the child has spent the majority of time during the prior six months. (2) "Relocation" means a change in the principal residence of a child for a period of sixty days or more, but does not include a temporary absence from the principal residence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 65 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases:
- McLain v. McLain (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2007, 974 So. 2d 726)“…T MURRAY, Judge. This is a child relocation dispute under La. R.S. 9:355.1-9:355.17. Emilie Wiltz McLain appeals t…”
- Baxter v. Baxter (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2015, 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0085)“…ter failed to comply with the Louisiana relocation statute, La. R.S. 9:355.1 et. seq. Second, he contends that Can…”
- Hulshoff v. Hulshoff (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2011, 11 La.App. 3 Cir. 1055)“…urt therefore found that the Louisiana relocation statutes, La. R.S. 9:355.1 et seq., were applicable. After makin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9:364Child custody; visitationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. There is created a presumption that no parent who has a history of perpetrating family violence, as defined in R.S. 9:362, or domestic abuse, as defined in R.S. 46:2132, or has subjected any of his or her children, stepchildren, or any household member, as defined in R.S. 46:2132, to sexual abuse, as defined in R.S. 14:403, or has willingly permitted another to abuse any of his children or stepchildren, despite having the ability to prevent the abuse, shall be awarded sole or joint custody of children. The court may find a history of perpetrating family violence if the court finds that one incident of family violence has resulted in serious bodily injury or the court finds more than one incident of family violence. B. The presumption shall be overcome only if the court finds all of the following by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) The perpetrating parent has successfully completed a court-monitored domestic abuse intervention program as defined in R.S. 9:362, or a treatment program designed for sexual abusers, after the last instance of abuse. (2) The perpetrating parent is not abusing alcohol or using illegal substances scheduled in R.S. 40:964.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 57 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- State in Interest of AC (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1994, 643 So. 2d 719)“…decision to uphold as constitutional the first sentence of La.R.S. 9:364(D), which provides that "[i]f any court…”
- Folse v. Folse (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1999, 738 So. 2d 1040)“…supervised visitation is in the children's best interest. La.R.S. 9:364(D). The Legislature enacted the PSFVR…”
- Hicks v. Hicks (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1999, 733 So. 2d 1261)“…ng to apply the Post-Separation Family Violence Relief Act, La.R.S. 9:364, we reverse the award of joint custody…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- La. Civ. Code Art. 131 -- Court to determine custody by best interests (see also Arts. 132-134)(legis.la.gov).gov
- R.S. 9:335 -- Joint custody implementation order and domiciliary parent designation(legis.la.gov).gov
- R.S. 9:355.1 et seq. -- Relocation of a child(legis.la.gov).gov
- R.S. 9:364 -- Presumption against custody for family violence, domestic abuse, or sexual abuse(legis.la.gov).gov