Minnesota Spousal Maintenance (Alimony) Laws: The 2024 Reform (2026)

Minnesota uses the term "spousal maintenance," not alimony. A major 2024 reform under House File 3204, effective August 1, 2024, renamed the types of maintenance and added three rebuttable presumptions based on the length of the marriage under Minn. Stat. section 518.552.

Information last verified on June 1, 2026.

Estimate your situation: Try our free Minnesota alimony calculator to estimate spousal support and see the factors a Minnesota court weighs.

What is spousal maintenance in Minnesota?

Spousal maintenance is financial support paid by one spouse to the other after a marriage is dissolved or parties legally separate. Minnesota courts may award maintenance when the spouse seeking support either lacks sufficient property to meet reasonable needs given the marital standard of living, cannot adequately support themselves through employment, or is the custodian of a child whose circumstances make outside employment inappropriate. Minn. Stat. section 518.552, subd. 1 governs who is eligible.

The term "alimony" has no legal significance in Minnesota. Every court order, statute, and court rule uses "spousal maintenance." If you see the word "alimony" in everyday conversation, it refers to the same thing.

Maintenance is separate from property division. A court may award maintenance regardless of how marital property is divided, and the two analyses use different statutes.

The 2024 reform: renamed types and new presumptions

Governor Walz signed House File 3204 into law on May 15, 2024. The amendments took effect on August 1, 2024, and changed Minnesota spousal maintenance law in two fundamental ways.

New terminology. What courts previously called "temporary maintenance" is now called transitional maintenance. What courts previously called "permanent maintenance" is now called indefinite maintenance. The change is not merely cosmetic: the 2024 legislature deliberately moved away from the word "permanent" because it implied that an award would never end, which was rarely accurate in practice. An award of temporary maintenance issued before August 1, 2024 is treated as transitional maintenance, and an award of permanent maintenance issued before August 1, 2024 is treated as indefinite maintenance.

"Temporary maintenance" still exists, with a narrower meaning. The term was not retired from the statute. Section 518.552, subd. 3(a) provides that maintenance awarded during the pendency of an initial proceeding for dissolution or legal separation under Minn. Stat. section 518.131 is deemed temporary maintenance. So a support order entered while a divorce is still in progress is still properly called temporary maintenance, while a post-decree award that runs for a set period is transitional maintenance.

New rebuttable presumptions. The 2024 reform added subdivision 3 to section 518.552, which creates three marriage-length-based presumptions for the duration of any maintenance award. Before HF 3204, courts had broad discretion over duration with no statutory starting point. The presumptions now give courts and parties a defined baseline.

The presumptions are rebuttable, meaning either party may present evidence to overcome the default outcome. Courts still retain authority to depart from a presumption when the statutory factors and equities of the individual case justify a different result.

The marriage-length presumptions

Minn. Stat. section 518.552, subd. 3 defines "length of the marriage" as the period from the date of the marriage until the date the dissolution action is commenced. Courts apply one of three presumptions based on that measurement.

Marriages under 5 years. It is rebuttably presumed that no maintenance should be awarded. A spouse seeking maintenance in a short marriage must affirmatively overcome the presumption by demonstrating that the statutory factors justify an award despite the brief duration. Circumstances such as a disability that arose during the marriage or significant career sacrifices made for the benefit of the other spouse or children may be sufficient to rebut this presumption.

Marriages of at least 5 and less than 20 years. If the subdivision 1 factors support an award of maintenance at all, it is rebuttably presumed that transitional maintenance should be awarded for a duration of no longer than one-half the length of the marriage. For example, a 10-year marriage that qualifies for maintenance would carry a presumptive ceiling of 5 years of transitional maintenance. Either party may argue for a shorter or longer period based on the statutory factors, including the time reasonably needed for the recipient to complete education or training required to become self-supporting at the standard of living established during the marriage. If that presumptive ceiling does not fit your case, ask a Minnesota family lawyer for a free case evaluation on which statutory factors support a shorter or longer period (attorney advertising).

Marriages of 20 years or more. If the subdivision 1 factors support an award of maintenance at all, it is rebuttably presumed that indefinite maintenance should be awarded. Indefinite maintenance does not mean perpetual maintenance in every case. The paying spouse may seek modification later if circumstances substantially change. However, the default at the time of the decree is that maintenance continues without a set end date.

The maintenance article of HF 3204 took effect August 1, 2024. Unlike the parenting-time article of the same session law, it carries no clause limiting it to proceedings commenced on or after that date. The presumptions can also reach an older decree through a modification motion: under section 518.552, subd. 5b(c), a court ruling on a motion to modify maintenance must apply, along with all other relevant factors, the factors for an award of maintenance under subdivisions 1 to 3 "that exist at the time of the motion." Subdivision 3(a) separately reclassifies awards that were issued before August 1, 2024 under the new terminology.

How much maintenance is awarded

Minnesota has no formula for the dollar amount of spousal maintenance. Courts have full discretion to set the amount based on the facts of each case. Section 518.552, subd. 2 lists eight factors the court must consider.

1. Financial resources of the recipient. The court looks at the recipient's income, property received in the division of marital assets, and the realistic ability to become self-supporting.
2. Time needed for education or training. The court considers how long the recipient will need to acquire skills, education, or employment to reach the standard of living established during the marriage, and the probability of achieving that goal.
3. Standard of living during the marriage. The court looks at the lifestyle the parties maintained during the marriage, including any standard of living funded by debt.
4. Duration of the marriage and employment opportunity costs. Courts account for how long the marriage lasted and what employment, education, or career advancement the recipient gave up in connection with the marriage.
5. Age, health, and other personal factors. The physical condition, mental health, and age of both parties are considered, as are any chemical dependency issues that affect earning capacity.
6. The payer's ability to support themselves while paying maintenance. Maintenance cannot reduce the payer's income below what is needed for their own reasonable needs.
7. Contributions to the other spouse's career or business. Courts recognize situations in which one spouse's support, direct contributions, or sacrifices enabled the other to advance professionally.
8. Each party's ability to prepare for retirement. Courts examine whether both parties have a reasonable opportunity to save for retirement after accounting for the maintenance award.

None of these factors is weighted more heavily than any other. Courts weigh the full picture. The central question is whether the recipient has a genuine financial need and whether the payer has the ability to meet that need.

When maintenance ends or changes

Death. Under section 518.552, subd. 5a, a maintenance obligation ends upon the death of either party unless the dissolution decree expressly states otherwise. Parties sometimes negotiate provisions that survive the payer's death and are funded through life insurance.

Remarriage. Maintenance also terminates automatically upon the remarriage of the recipient unless the decree provides otherwise. Courts rarely extend maintenance past remarriage by agreement.

Cohabitation. Section 518.552, subd. 6 gives courts express authority to modify maintenance when the recipient cohabits with another adult after the dissolution. A modification for cohabitation may take the form of a reduction, suspension, reservation, or termination of maintenance. In deciding whether cohabitation justifies modification, the court must consider: (1) whether the recipient would marry the cohabitant but for the maintenance award; (2) the economic benefit the recipient derives from the cohabitation; (3) the length and likely future duration of the cohabitation; and (4) the economic impact on the recipient if maintenance is modified and the cohabitation ends. The court may not modify maintenance based solely on cohabitation if a marriage between the recipient and the cohabitant would be legally prohibited under certain circumstances specified in Minn. Stat. section 517.03. Under subdivision 6, a motion to modify based on cohabitation may not be brought within one year of the date of entry of the dissolution or legal separation decree, unless the parties agree in writing to allow an earlier motion or the court finds that denying the motion would create an extreme hardship.

Modification for changed circumstances. Under section 518.552, subd. 5b, either party may seek to modify a maintenance award upon a showing of substantially changed circumstances, including a significant change in income, need, or applicable federal or state tax law. A court may make a modification retroactive to the date the motion to modify was served.

Retirement. Section 518.552, subd. 7 recognizes retirement as a basis for modification. Subdivision 7(a) states only that if a party retires, spousal maintenance may be modified, and that the modification may consist of a reduction, suspension, reservation, or termination. The statute imposes no minimum age as a precondition, and it applies to the retirement of either party, not only the paying spouse. In deciding the motion, the court considers whether the retirement is in good faith or an unjustifiable self-limitation of income; whether the party has attained the age to receive full retirement benefits under the Social Security Act or the customary age for retirement in that party's occupation; whether the party has reasonably and prudently managed assets since the dissolution; and the financial resources available to both parties. A party is not presumed to have retired in bad faith when the retirement occurs on or after that age. Under subdivision 7(e), a motion may be brought before the party actually retires, provided the moving party specifies the date retirement will occur, and the court may make the modification effective as of the actual retirement date.

Is alimony taxable, and how it differs from Minnesota child support

Federal tax treatment after 2018. For dissolution agreements executed after December 31, 2018, the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the prior rule that made alimony deductible for the payer and taxable income for the recipient. Under current IRS rules (Topic No. 452), spousal maintenance paid under a post-2018 decree is not deductible by the payer and is not included in the recipient's gross income. This change is permanent and will not revert when other TCJA provisions expire.

For divorces finalized before January 1, 2019, the old rules still apply: the payer may deduct payments and the recipient must report them as income, unless a subsequent modification expressly adopts the newer treatment.

Minnesota child support. Spousal maintenance and child support serve different purposes and are calculated differently. Child support in Minnesota is set under a guidelines formula using both parents' gross incomes and the parenting-time percentage. Child support ends when the child becomes an adult (or sooner in some circumstances), while spousal maintenance is based on the financial needs of a former spouse and can continue indefinitely in a long marriage. Child support is never deductible for the payer and never taxable to the recipient, regardless of when the divorce occurred.

For a complete overview of Minnesota's child support rules, see Minnesota child support laws.

For a comparison of how other states handle spousal maintenance or alimony, see Alimony laws by state.

---

Legal disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about Minnesota spousal maintenance law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and court interpretations change. Contact a licensed Minnesota family law attorney for advice about your specific situation.

---

Last updated: June 1, 2026.

More Minnesota Laws

• Minnesota Child Custody Laws
• Minnesota Child Support Laws
• Minnesota Common Law Marriage Laws
• Minnesota Divorce Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Minnesota call it alimony or spousal maintenance?

Minnesota uses the term 'spousal maintenance.' The word 'alimony' has no legal status in Minnesota statutes or court rules. Minn. Stat. section 518.552 governs all aspects of spousal maintenance in dissolution and legal separation cases.

What did the 2024 reform change about spousal maintenance in Minnesota?

House File 3204, effective August 1, 2024, made two major changes. First, it renamed the types of maintenance: 'temporary' became 'transitional' and 'permanent' became 'indefinite.' The term 'temporary maintenance' remains in the statute, but subdivision 3(a) now uses it only for maintenance awarded while an initial dissolution or legal separation proceeding is still pending. Second, it added three rebuttable presumptions based on the length of the marriage, giving courts a statutory starting point for duration that did not exist before.

How long will spousal maintenance last in a 12-year marriage in Minnesota?

Under the 2024 reform, a 12-year marriage falls in the bracket for marriages of at least 5 years and less than 20 years. If the subdivision 1 eligibility factors support an award of maintenance at all, the rebuttable presumption is that transitional maintenance lasts no longer than half the length of the marriage, which would be a maximum of 6 years. Either party can present evidence to argue for a different duration based on the section 518.552 statutory factors.

Is there a formula for calculating how much spousal maintenance to pay in Minnesota?

No. Minnesota has no mathematical formula for the amount of maintenance. Courts weigh eight statutory factors under Minn. Stat. section 518.552, subd. 2, centering on the recipient's financial need and the payer's ability to pay while meeting their own reasonable needs.

Can spousal maintenance be modified in Minnesota if the recipient moves in with a new partner?

Yes. Cohabitation with another adult after the dissolution is an express statutory basis for modification under section 518.552, subd. 6. The court can reduce, suspend, reserve, or terminate maintenance. It must consider the economic benefit the recipient receives from the cohabitation and the likely future duration of that living arrangement. Note that a cohabitation-based modification motion may not be brought within one year of entry of the dissolution decree unless the parties agree otherwise or extreme hardship exists.

Does spousal maintenance end automatically when the recipient remarries?

Yes, in most cases. Under section 518.552, subd. 5a, maintenance terminates upon the recipient's remarriage unless the decree expressly provides otherwise. The parties may negotiate a different arrangement, such as maintenance funded by life insurance that survives the payer's death, but the default rule is automatic termination on remarriage.

Is spousal maintenance taxable income in Minnesota divorces?

For divorces finalized after December 31, 2018, federal law under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provides that maintenance is not deductible for the payer and not taxable income for the recipient. Pre-2019 agreements follow the older rule: deductible for the payer and taxable for the recipient. Minnesota conforms to federal treatment. Always consult a tax professional for guidance on your specific decree.