District of Columbia
Washington, D.C. Alimony Laws: How Spousal Support Works (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. How we verify our legal content

Alimony in the District of Columbia is governed by D.C. Code section 16-913. A court may order one spouse to pay support to the other when it finds an award "just and proper." There is no formula; every case turns on the facts. The court chooses between indefinite and term-limited alimony based on those same facts.
Information last verified on June 1, 2026.
Estimate your situation: Try our free District of Columbia alimony calculator to estimate spousal support and see the factors a District of Columbia court weighs.
What Is Alimony in Washington, D.C.?
Alimony - also called spousal support - is a court-ordered payment from one former spouse to the other after a divorce or legal separation. In D.C., the same rules apply when a domestic partnership is terminated under D.C. Code section 32-702(d) or 16-904(e) and one partner files for spousal support relief.
The authority for alimony comes from D.C. Code section 16-913, which states that when a divorce or legal separation is granted, "the Court may require either party to pay alimony to the other party if it seems just and proper." Either spouse may be the paying party; gender is not a factor.
D.C. does not use a mathematical formula for alimony. There is no income-percentage rule, no guideline chart, and no presumptive duration tied to marriage length. Each award is crafted by the judge based on the specific circumstances of the case.
Indefinite vs. Term-Limited Alimony
D.C. Code section 16-913(b) gives the court two structural options.

Indefinite alimony has no defined end date. The obligation continues until the court modifies or terminates it, or until a triggering event occurs (such as the death of either party or the recipient's remarriage). Courts in D.C. tend to reserve indefinite alimony for long marriages, situations where a spouse is unlikely ever to become fully self-supporting due to age or health, or marriages where one party sacrificed significant career development for the household.
Term-limited alimony runs for a defined period. The duration is set in the order itself. It is commonly awarded when the recipient needs time to obtain education, job training, or work experience before becoming self-supporting. The term is supposed to give the recipient a realistic runway, not a windfall.
The court has discretion to structure the award "as appropriate to the facts," which means payments can vary in amount over the term, step down over time, or be conditioned on specific milestones if the circumstances support it.
An alimony award may be made retroactive to the date the pleading requesting alimony was filed, so neither party gains an advantage by delaying the proceedings.
How D.C. Courts Decide: The Section 16-913 Factors
Because there is no formula, the judge's analysis of the statutory factors is the entire decision. D.C. Code section 16-913(d) requires the court to consider all relevant factors, including the following nine:
1. Ability to be self-supporting. The court looks at whether the party seeking alimony can support themselves, wholly or in part. A spouse with marketable skills, recent work history, and no health barriers will receive less weight here than one who has been out of the workforce for years.
2. Time and cost of education or training. If the recipient needs a degree, a professional license, or vocational training to find suitable employment, the court considers how long that will take and what it will cost. This factor is the primary driver of term-limited awards.
3. Standard of living during the marriage. The court considers the lifestyle the couple maintained, adjusted to reflect the reality that two households cost more than one. Neither party can expect to live exactly as they did during the marriage; the court aims for a reasonable standard, not an identical one.
4. Duration of the marriage. Longer marriages generally support larger or longer awards. A three-year marriage and a thirty-year marriage present very different equitable situations, even if the financial circumstances look similar on paper.
5. Circumstances contributing to the estrangement. D.C. is a no-fault divorce jurisdiction, meaning divorce itself does not require proof of fault. However, section 16-913(d)(5) specifically includes the circumstances causing the separation, and abuse history is an enumerated consideration. A court may weigh a history of domestic violence when fashioning an appropriate award.
6. Age of each party. Age affects earning capacity, the ability to retrain for new work, and the realistic horizon for self-sufficiency. A 58-year-old who left the workforce 25 years ago faces very different prospects than a 32-year-old in the same situation.
7. Physical and mental condition of each party. A chronic illness, disability, or mental health condition that limits a spouse's ability to work is a significant factor. The court also considers the obligor's health and how it affects their ability to pay.
8. Ability of the obligor to meet both parties' needs. The court looks at what the paying spouse can actually afford after meeting their own reasonable living expenses. A support order that leaves the obligor unable to pay their own bills is not workable.
9. Financial needs and resources of both parties. This is a broad category. D.C. Code section 16-913(d)(9) specifically includes earned income, income derived from assets, imputed income (what a party could earn if employed), prior child support awards, other financial obligations, retirement benefits, and the income tax consequences of any award.
The court is not limited to these nine factors. The statute says the court shall consider "all relevant factors, including" the nine listed. A judge may weigh any other circumstances that bear on fairness and equity.
When Alimony Ends or Changes
Death or Remarriage

Alimony generally terminates on the death of either the payer or the recipient. If the recipient remarries, the obligation to pay alimony ends because the recipient now has a new legal spouse whose financial circumstances become relevant. These principles are grounded in the general structure of D.C. family law and are reinforced by the court's continuing jurisdiction to modify or terminate any support order.
Modification
D.C. Code section 16-914.01 expressly preserves the court's jurisdiction to enter future orders modifying or terminating an alimony judgment. A party seeking modification must demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances - a major shift in income, health, employment, or living situation - since the original order was entered. Courts do not revisit alimony simply because one party is unhappy with the outcome; the changed-circumstances standard is a real threshold.
Either party may file a motion to modify. The court considers the same statutory factors it used originally, applied to the current circumstances of both parties.
Cohabitation
D.C. Code section 16-913 does not include an automatic termination trigger for cohabitation the way some state statutes do. If the recipient begins living with a new partner, the obligor must return to court and demonstrate that the cohabitation has materially changed the recipient's financial needs. The court then decides whether modification is appropriate.
Is Alimony Taxable in Washington, D.C.?
The federal tax rules changed significantly under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Agreements signed after December 31, 2018: Alimony payments are not deductible by the payer and are not included in the recipient's gross income. The payment is treated as a non-event for federal income tax purposes.
Agreements signed before January 1, 2019: The old rules still apply. The payer may deduct alimony payments, and the recipient must include them as taxable income.
Modified pre-2019 agreements: If a pre-2019 agreement is modified after 2018 and the modification document expressly states that the post-2018 rules apply, the new rules govern that modified agreement.
D.C. does not have a separate local alimony deduction or income-inclusion rule that differs from the federal treatment. For any tax year in which alimony is paid or received, both parties should consult a tax professional to determine the correct reporting for their specific situation.
Alimony vs. D.C. Child Support
Alimony and child support are separate legal obligations with different rules.

Alimony is owed to a former spouse to address the financial disparity created by the marriage and its end. It terminates on death, remarriage, and by court order. It is not earmarked for any particular purpose.
Child support in D.C. is governed by the D.C. Child Support Guideline under D.C. Code section 16-916.01. Unlike alimony, child support uses a specific formula based on the parents' incomes, parenting time, and the child's needs. Child support is owed to provide for the child and cannot be waived by either parent; it belongs to the child. Child support continues until the child reaches the age of majority or becomes emancipated.
For detailed information on how D.C. calculates child support, see D.C. child support laws.
For a broader comparison of how alimony works across all U.S. states and the District of Columbia, see alimony laws by state.
This page provides general legal information, not legal advice. D.C. alimony cases involve facts-specific judicial discretion. Consult a licensed D.C. family law attorney for advice about your situation.
Last updated: June 1, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Washington, D.C. use a formula to calculate alimony?
No. D.C. Code section 16-913 contains no formula, no guideline chart, and no income-percentage rule. The court decides the amount and duration based on all relevant facts using the nine statutory factors and any other circumstances bearing on fairness.
Can a D.C. court award alimony forever?
Yes. D.C. Code section 16-913(b) explicitly allows indefinite alimony with no defined end date. It is most common in long marriages or when a spouse cannot reasonably become self-supporting. The court may also award term-limited alimony for a specific period.
Does fault matter for alimony in D.C.?
D.C. is a no-fault divorce jurisdiction, so fault is not required to obtain a divorce. However, the alimony statute (section 16-913(d)(5)) specifically requires the court to consider the circumstances contributing to the estrangement, including any history of abuse. Fault can therefore influence the alimony award even though it is not required for the divorce itself.
Will alimony stop if the recipient moves in with a new partner?
Not automatically. D.C. law does not include a cohabitation-termination trigger. The paying spouse would need to return to court, demonstrate that the cohabitation has substantially changed the recipient's financial needs, and obtain a modification order.
Can an alimony order be changed after it is entered?
Yes. D.C. Code section 16-914.01 preserves the court's continuing jurisdiction to modify or terminate any alimony order. The party seeking modification must show a substantial change in circumstances since the original order, such as a significant change in income, health, or employment status.
How does the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act affect D.C. alimony?
For divorce agreements signed after December 31, 2018, alimony is no longer deductible by the payer and is not taxable income for the recipient under federal law. For agreements signed before that date, the old rules - payer deducts, recipient reports as income - still apply unless the agreement was modified with language adopting the new rules.
What is the difference between indefinite and term-limited alimony in D.C.?
Indefinite alimony has no set end date and continues until modified by the court or terminated by a triggering event such as death or remarriage. Term-limited alimony runs for a specific period defined in the court order, typically used when the recipient needs time to become self-supporting through education or job training.
Talk to a District of Columbia family-law attorney: free case review
Every case has details a formula cannot capture. Get a free, no-obligation review from a District of Columbia family-law attorney.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of the District of Columbia, Title 16: Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. - Chapter 9: Divorce, Annulment, Separation, Support, Etc.
§ 16-904Grounds for divorce, legal separation, and annulment.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) A divorce from the bonds of marriage may be granted upon the assertion by one or both parties that they no longer wish to remain married. (b) A legal separation from bed and board may be granted upon at least one party's assertion that they intend to pursue a separate life without obtaining a divorce. (c) [Repealed]. (d) Marriage contracts may be annulled in the following cases: (1) where such marriage was contracted while either of the parties thereto had a former spouse living, unless the former marriage had been lawfully dissolved; (2) where such marriage was contracted during the insanity of either party (unless there has been voluntary cohabitation after the discovery of the insanity); (3) where such marriage was procured by fraud or coercion; (4) where either party was matrimonially incapacitated at the time of marriage without the knowledge of the other and has continued to be so incapacitated; or (5) where either of the parties had not attained the age of 18, but in such cases only at the suit of the party who had not attained such age.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Cited in 5 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2016
Leading cases:
- Rachal v. Rachal (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 1985, 489 A.2d 476)“…irmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded. . See D.C.Code § 16-904(a)(2) (1981). . See D.C.Code §…”
- IVANA CEROVIC v. DUSKO J. STOJKOV (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2016, 134 A.3d 766)“…arriage is proven, it renders invalid a later marriage. See D.C. Code § 16-904 (d)(1) (2012 Repl.) (providing that a m…”
- Nehme v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2001, 252 F.3d 415)“…06 (West 2000); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 46b-40 (West 2000); D.C. Code Ann. § 16-904 (1998); 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/402…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Common Law Marriage in the District of Columbia: Is It Recognized? (2026), Divorce Laws by State (2026): Grounds, Residency, and Property, District of Columbia Divorce Laws (2026): Grounds, Residency, and Process
§ 16-913Alimony.In force
(a) When a divorce or legal separation is granted, or when a termination of a domestic partnership becomes effective under § 32-702(d) or § 16-904(e) and one partner has filed a petition for relief available under this section, the Court may require either party to pay alimony to the other party if it seems just and proper. (b) The award of alimony may be indefinite or term-limited and structured as appropriate to the facts. The Court shall determine the amount and the time period for the award of alimony. (c) An award of alimony may be retroactive to the date of the filing of the pleading that requests alimony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2016
Leading cases:
- IVANA CEROVIC v. DUSKO J. STOJKOV (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2016, 134 A.3d 766)“…Leftwich v. Leftwich, 442 A.2d 139, 142 (D.C. 1982). Under D.C. Code § 16-913 (d), the trial court must consider a v…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-914.01Retention of jurisdiction as to alimony, custody of children, and child support.In force
After the issuance of a judgment, decree, or order granting custody, child support, or alimony, the Court retains jurisdiction for the entry of future orders modifying or terminating the initial judgment, decree, or order to the extent the retention of jurisdiction does not contravene other statutory provisions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
§ 16-916.01Child Support Guideline.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) In any case that involves the establishment of child support, or in any case that seeks to modify an existing support order, if the judicial officer finds that there is an existing duty of child support, the judicial officer shall conduct a hearing on child support, make a finding, and enter a judgment in accordance with the child support guideline (“guideline”) established in this section. (b) In every action for divorce or custody, and in every proceeding for protection involving an intrafamily offense, instituted pursuant to Chapter 10 of Title 16, where a party has a legal duty to pay support to another party, the judicial officer shall inquire into the parties’ child support arrangements. If the party entitled to child support has not requested support, or if the parties have agreed against the entry of a support order, the judicial officer shall advise the parties, regardless of whether they are represented by counsel, of the parties’ entitlement to receive and obligation to pay child support under the guideline.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at github.com
Cited in 9 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Massey v. Massey (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2019, 210 A.3d 148)“…this argument. In her initial brief, Ms. Pope Massey cites D.C. Code § 16-916.01(a) as part of her argument that the jud…”
- Antwayne Eric Ford v. Rita Castillo (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2014, 98 A.3d 962)“…gross income (AGI) under the D.C. Child Support Guideline, D.C. Code § 16-916.01 (2012 Repl.),1 by not subtracting cert…”
- Hershey v. Hershey (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2025)“…child-support guidelines presumptively apply. See D.C. Code § 16-916.01(h) (Guidelines do not presumptively app…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: D.C. Child Support Laws (2026): Guidelines & Calculator
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- D.C. Code § 16-913 -- Alimony(code.dccouncil.gov)
- D.C. Code § 16-904 -- Grounds for Divorce(code.dccouncil.gov)
- D.C. Code § 16-914.01 -- Retention of Jurisdiction(code.dccouncil.gov)
- D.C. Code § 16-916.01 -- Child Support Guideline(code.dccouncil.gov)
- IRS Topic No. 452 -- Alimony and Separate Maintenance(irs.gov)