California
California Spousal Support (Alimony) Laws: How It Works (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. How we verify our legal content
California does not use the word "alimony" in its statutes. The state calls it spousal support, and it comes in two distinct forms: temporary support calculated by a local guideline formula while the case is pending, and long-term support determined by the court's discretionary analysis of the fourteen factors in .
Information last verified on June 1, 2026.
Estimate your situation: Try our free California alimony calculator to estimate spousal support and see the factors a California court weighs.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers California state law only. For a comparison across all fifty states, see Alimony Laws by State.
What Is Spousal Support in California?
Spousal support in California is a court-ordered payment from one spouse or registered domestic partner to the other following the breakdown of a marriage or domestic partnership. authorizes the court to order support "in an amount, for a period of time, that the court determines is just and reasonable" based on the marital standard of living.
California courts do not use the word "alimony" in formal proceedings. The term "spousal support" appears throughout the Family Code, and the same rules generally apply to domestic partners under the Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act.
Support can be ordered in two distinct phases of a dissolution case: during the case as a temporary order, and at the conclusion of the case as a long-term or "permanent" order in the judgment. Each phase uses a fundamentally different method of calculation, and confusing the two is one of the most common misunderstandings in California family law.
Temporary vs. Long-Term Spousal Support
Understanding the difference between temporary and long-term support is essential because the rules governing each are not the same.
Temporary spousal support is ordered while the divorce or legal separation case is ongoing, from the time of a request until a final judgment is entered. Because the case has not yet resolved, the court does not conduct a full analysis of all circumstances. Instead, most California trial courts apply a local guideline formula to set a starting point quickly. The most widely used version of this formula is:
Monthly support = 40% of the higher earner's net monthly income minus 50% of the lower earner's net monthly income.
The California Courts Self Help Guide confirms this formula as the standard starting point for temporary support calculations in California. The court retains discretion to adjust the guideline result based on specific circumstances, such as unusually high housing costs, extraordinary medical expenses, or child support obligations that affect the net income figures. The guideline formula is a practical tool for temporary orders only and has no statutory basis in the long-term support statutes.
Long-term spousal support is determined at or after the final judgment. At this stage, the court does not apply the guideline formula. Instead, the court conducts a full analysis of each party's situation using the fourteen discretionary factors listed in Fam. Code § 4320. The marital standard of living serves as the benchmark against which need and ability to pay are measured, but the court must work through all fourteen factors before entering a long-term order. The amount of temporary support is not a reliable predictor of the long-term support amount.
How the Court Decides Long-Term Support: The Section 4320 Factors
lists the circumstances the court must consider in ordering long-term support. The statute's subsections, in the order they appear, are:
(a) Earning capacity of each party. The extent to which the earning capacity of each party is sufficient to maintain the standard of living established during the marriage, including: (1) the marketable skills of the supported party, the job market for those skills, and the time and cost of acquiring education or training; and (2) the extent to which the supported party's earning capacity is impaired by periods of unemployment incurred during the marriage to permit the supported party to devote time to domestic duties.
(b) The extent to which the supported party contributed to the attainment of an education, training, a career position, or a license by the supporting party.
(c) The ability of the supporting party to pay spousal support, considering the supporting party's earning capacity, earned and unearned income, assets, and standard of living.
(d) The needs of each party based on the standard of living established during the marriage.
(e) The obligations and assets, including the separate property, of each party.
(f) The duration of the marriage.
(g) The ability of the supported party to engage in gainful employment without unduly interfering with the interests of dependent children in the custody of the party.
(h) The age and health of the parties.
(i) Documented evidence of any history of domestic violence between the parties, including consideration of emotional distress resulting from domestic violence, and consideration of any domestic violence perpetrated against the supported party by the supporting party.
(j) The immediate and specific tax consequences to each party.
(k) The balance of the hardships to each party.
(l) The goal that the supported party shall be self-supporting within a reasonable period of time. Except in the case of a marriage of long duration as described under Section 4336, a "reasonable period of time" for purposes of this section generally shall be one-half the length of the marriage.
(m) The criminal conviction of an abusive spouse shall be considered in making a reduction or elimination of a spousal support award in accordance with Section 4324.5 or 4325.
(n) Any other factors the court determines are just and equitable.
No single factor is automatically controlling. Courts weigh all the circumstances together. The marital standard of living, the length of the marriage, and each party's earning capacity tend to carry the most weight in practice, but a factor such as documented domestic violence or a significant health impairment can substantially shift the outcome.
How Long Spousal Support Lasts
The duration of support is one of the most frequently contested issues in California divorce cases. The answer depends primarily on whether the marriage qualifies as one of "long duration."
The half-the-marriage guideline. For marriages under ten years in length, Fam. Code § 4320(l) directs the court to treat one-half the length of the marriage as the presumptive "reasonable period of time" for the supported spouse to become self-supporting. This means that after a five-year marriage, a court would ordinarily expect support to end by the 30-month mark. This is not a fixed rule; the court retains discretion to order a longer or shorter period based on the other section 4320 factors.
Long marriages of ten years or more. establishes that a marriage lasting ten years or more, measured from the date of marriage to the date of separation, carries a presumption that it is a marriage of "long duration." For a marriage of long duration, the court is not required to set a fixed end date for support, and there is no statutory equivalent of the half-the-marriage guideline. Instead, the court retains jurisdiction over support indefinitely, meaning either party may return to court to seek modification or termination as circumstances change over time. The court may also find that a marriage of fewer than ten years qualifies as "long duration" based on the facts of the case.
It is important to understand that retaining jurisdiction is not the same as ordering permanent support. The court may still set a termination date for a long marriage if the circumstances warrant it. What section 4336 does is preserve the court's ability to revisit the issue rather than cutting off jurisdiction at the end of a fixed term.
How Support Ends or Changes
Spousal support does not always require a court hearing to end. Several events automatically terminate the obligation by statute.
Automatic termination. Under Fam. Code § 4337, the obligation to pay spousal support terminates automatically on the death of either party or the remarriage of the supported spouse, unless the parties have a written agreement providing otherwise.
Support order expiration. Under Fam. Code § 4335, a support order terminates at the end of the period stated in the order and may not be extended unless the order itself reserves the court's jurisdiction or the court has retained jurisdiction under Fam. Code § 4336.
Cohabitation. Under Fam. Code § 4323, if the supported spouse is cohabiting with a nonmarital partner, there is a rebuttable presumption of decreased need for support. The paying spouse may move to modify or terminate support based on this presumption. The presumption can be rebutted with evidence that the cohabiting relationship has not reduced the supported spouse's financial need. The income of a new spouse or partner of the paying spouse is not considered when calculating or modifying support under this section.
Modification for changed circumstances. Either party may petition the court to increase, reduce, or terminate support when there has been a material change in circumstances since the last order. Common grounds include a significant change in income, job loss, retirement, or a change in the supported spouse's financial situation. Modifications are generally effective from the date the modification request was filed, not from the date of the hearing.
Is Spousal Support Taxable in California?
The federal and California state tax treatment of spousal support have been out of alignment for several years and are now realigned as of 2026.
Federal tax treatment. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, for any divorce or separation instrument executed on or after January 1, 2019, spousal support is not deductible by the paying spouse and is not included in the gross income of the receiving spouse for federal income tax purposes. Pre-2019 agreements remain deductible/taxable unless modified and the modification expressly adopts the new treatment.
California state tax treatment after January 1, 2026. SB 711 (Chapter 231, Statutes of 2025), signed by the Governor on October 1, 2025, updated California's general federal tax conformity date to January 1, 2025. Crucially, SB 711 included a carve-out preserving the pre-TCJA alimony rules (former IRC Section 71, which made support deductible by the payor and taxable to the recipient) for instruments executed on or before December 31, 2025. That carve-out does not extend to instruments executed on or after January 1, 2026. For those post-2025 orders, California follows updated federal conformity: spousal support is not deductible by the payor on California state returns and is not taxable income to the recipient.
Transition rule. For instruments executed on or before December 31, 2025, the prior California treatment (deductible by the payor, taxable to the recipient) continues to apply. If a pre-2026 order is modified after December 31, 2025, the prior treatment still applies to that modified order unless the modification expressly states that the post-2025 tax treatment applies. Parties modifying existing orders should address this tax language explicitly with counsel.
The California Franchise Tax Board administers these rules for California state returns. Consult a licensed tax professional or attorney before making decisions based on the tax treatment of a spousal support order, particularly for orders in transition between the old and new rules.
Spousal support vs. child support. Unlike spousal support, California child support is calculated under a mandatory statewide guideline formula set by Fam. Code § 4055, not by the court's discretion. Child support is never deductible by the paying parent and is never taxable income to the receiving parent under either federal or California law.
Disclaimer: This article covers California spousal support law as of June 1, 2026, based on California Family Code §§ 4320, 4323, 4330, 4335, 4336, and 4337, and California SB 711 (Chapter 231, Statutes of 2025). Laws change and court outcomes vary by county and individual facts. This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Consult a licensed California family law attorney before making any decisions about spousal support.
Related Articles
- Alimony Laws by State - Full hub covering all fifty states
- California Child Support Laws - How California's mandatory guideline formula for child support differs from spousal support
Last updated: June 1, 2026.
RecordingLaw.com provides legal information, not legal advice. Always consult a licensed California family law attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
More California Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between temporary and long-term spousal support in California?
Temporary spousal support is ordered while the divorce case is pending and is typically calculated using a guideline formula (40% of the higher earner's net income minus 50% of the lower earner's net income). Long-term support is ordered at or after the final judgment and is determined by the court's discretionary analysis of the fourteen factors in Cal. Fam. Code § 4320, not by the guideline formula. The temporary amount is not a guarantee of what the long-term amount will be.
How long does spousal support last in California?
For marriages under ten years, support generally lasts about half the length of the marriage, though the court retains discretion to depart from that guideline (Fam. Code § 4320(l)). For marriages of ten years or more, which are presumed to be of 'long duration' under Fam. Code § 4336, the court retains jurisdiction over support indefinitely and is not required to set a fixed end date. Either party can return to court to modify or terminate support as circumstances change.
Does spousal support end automatically when a spouse remarries in California?
Yes. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4337, the obligation to pay spousal support terminates automatically upon the remarriage of the supported spouse, unless the parties have a written agreement providing otherwise. Support also terminates automatically on the death of either party.
Does living with a new partner affect spousal support in California?
Yes. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4323, if the supported spouse is cohabiting with a nonmarital partner, the law creates a rebuttable presumption of decreased need for support. The paying spouse can move to modify or terminate support on that basis. The supported spouse can rebut the presumption by showing the cohabitation has not actually reduced their financial need.
Is spousal support taxable in California in 2026?
For spousal support orders or agreements executed on or after January 1, 2026, payments are not deductible by the paying spouse and are not taxable income to the receiving spouse under California state law, following SB 711 (Ch. 231, Stats. 2025). For orders executed before that date, the prior treatment (deductible/taxable) continues unless a post-2025 modification expressly adopts SB 711. The federal treatment under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the same for orders after January 1, 2019.
What factors does a California court use to set long-term spousal support?
A California court must consider all fourteen factors in Cal. Fam. Code § 4320, including: each party's earning capacity and marketable skills; contributions to the other spouse's career or education; the supporting spouse's ability to pay; the needs of each party based on the marital standard of living; the duration of the marriage; age and health of both parties; history of domestic violence; and the goal of self-sufficiency. No single factor controls the outcome.
What is a 'long duration' marriage in California for spousal support purposes?
Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4336, a marriage of ten years or more (from date of marriage to date of separation) carries a presumption of long duration. For such marriages, the court retains jurisdiction over spousal support indefinitely and does not apply the half-the-marriage guideline that applies to shorter marriages. The court may also find a shorter marriage qualifies as long duration based on the specific facts.
Talk to a California family-law attorney: free case review
Every case has details a formula cannot capture. Get a free, no-obligation review from a California family-law attorney.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Family Code
§ 4320In forcecited in 2 of our articles
In ordering spousal support under this part, the court shall consider all of the following circumstances: (a) The extent to which the earning capacity of each party is sufficient to maintain the standard of living established during the marriage, taking into account all of the following: (1) The marketable skills of the supported party; the job market for those skills; the time and expenses required for the supported party to acquire the appropriate education or training to develop those skills; and the possible need for retraining or education to acquire other, more marketable skills or employment. (2) The extent to which the supported party’s present or future earning capacity is impaired by periods of unemployment that were incurred during the marriage to permit the supported party to devote time to domestic duties. (b) The extent to which the supported party contributed to the attainment of an education, training, a career position, or a license by the supporting party. (c) The ability of the supporting party to pay spousal support, taking into account the supporting party’s earning capacity, earned and unearned income, assets, and standard of living.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 152 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Schmir v. Schmir (California Court of Appeal 2005, 134 Cal. App. 4th 43)“…age of Olson, supra, 14 Cal.App.4th at page 12 . Family Code section 4320, subdivisions (e), (h), (k), and (n),…”
- Rosen v. Rosen (California Court of Appeal 2002, 105 Cal. App. 4th 808)“…rned and unearned income, assets, and standard of living.” (Fam. Code, § 4320, subd. (c); see also In re Marriage of…”
- In Re Marriage of West (California Court of Appeal 2007, 60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 858)“…der The trial court, citing the factors set forth in Family Code section 4320, found no issue as to Til’s earning cap…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alimony by State: How Spousal Support Works (2026)
§ 4323In force
(a) (1) Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing, there is a rebuttable presumption, affecting the burden of proof, of decreased need for spousal support if the supported party is cohabiting with a nonmarital partner. Upon a determination that circumstances have changed, the court may modify or terminate the spousal support as provided for in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 3650) of Part 1. (2) Holding oneself out to be the spouse of the person with whom one is cohabiting is not necessary to constitute cohabitation as the term is used in this subdivision. (b) The income of a supporting spouse’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner shall not be considered when determining or modifying spousal support. (c) Nothing in this section precludes later modification or termination of spousal support on proof of change of circumstances.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 13 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- In Re Marriage of Romero (California Court of Appeal 2002, 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 220)“…rred in considering his new spouse's income in violation of Family Code section 4323, subdivision (b). We conclude that, u…”
- Romero v. Romero (California Court of Appeal 2002, 99 Cal. App. 4th 1436)“…rred in considering his new spouse’s income in violation of Family Code section 4323, subdivision (b). We conclude that, u…”
- In Re Marriage of Reynolds (California Court of Appeal 1998, 63 Cal. App. 4th 1373)“…elle’s separate investments, which could not be considered (Fam. Code, § 4323, subd. (b)), as well as unemployment be…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 4330In force
(a) In a judgment of dissolution of marriage or legal separation of the parties, the court may order a party to pay for the support of the other party an amount, for a period of time, that the court determines is just and reasonable, based on the standard of living established during the marriage, taking into consideration the circumstances as provided in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 4320). (b) When making an order for spousal support, the court may advise the recipient of support that the recipient should make reasonable efforts to assist in providing for their support needs, taking into account the particular circumstances considered by the court pursuant to Section 4320, unless, in the case of a marriage of long duration as provided for in Section 4336, the court decides this warning is inadvisable.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 20 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- In Re Marriage of Pendleton & Fireman (California Supreme Court 2000, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 278)“…NOTES [1] The right to spousal support is statutory. Family Code section 4330, subdivision (a), provides: "In a judgm…”
- Schmir v. Schmir (California Court of Appeal 2005, 134 Cal. App. 4th 43)“…sent case, the Legislature codified the Gavron warning in Family Code section 4330, subdivision (b) first making it *56 m…”
- In RE MARRIAGE OF McCANN (California Court of Appeal 1996, 41 Cal. App. 4th 978)“…ing the marriage. (Former Civ. Code, § 4801, subd. (a), now Fam. Code, § 4330; In re Marriage of Hoffmeister…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 4335In force
An order for spousal support terminates at the end of the period provided in the order and shall not be extended unless the court retains jurisdiction in the order or under Section 4336.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 1994
Leading cases:
- In Re Marriage of Christie (California Court of Appeal 1994, 28 Cal. App. 4th 849)“…Code section 4801, subdivision (d), 5 (see now Fam. Code, § 4335 6 ) providing that an orde…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 4336In force
(a) Except on written agreement of the parties to the contrary or a court order terminating spousal support, the court retains jurisdiction indefinitely in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the parties where the marriage is of long duration. (b) For the purpose of retaining jurisdiction, there is a presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence that a marriage of 10 years or more, from the date of marriage to the date of separation, is a marriage of long duration. However, the court may consider periods of separation during the marriage in determining whether the marriage is in fact of long duration. Nothing in this subdivision precludes a court from determining that a marriage of less than 10 years is a marriage of long duration. (c) Nothing in this section limits the court’s discretion to terminate spousal support in later proceedings on a showing of changed circumstances. (d) This section applies to the following: (1) A proceeding filed on or after January 1, 1988. (2) A proceeding pending on January 1, 1988, in which the court has not entered a permanent spousal support order or in which the court order is subject to modification.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 21 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- In Re Marriage of Christie (California Court of Appeal 1994, 28 Cal. App. 4th 849)“…il Code section 4801, subdivision (d), much of which is now Family Code section 4336, subdivisions (a) through (c), reads:…”
- In Re Marriage of Ostrander (California Court of Appeal 1997, 53 Cal. App. 4th 63)“…d that since the marriage was of long duration, pursuant to Family Code section 4336 the court had retained jurisdiction to…”
- In Re Marriage of Beck (California Court of Appeal 1997, 57 Cal. App. 4th 341)“…ded in 1987 (Stats. 1987, ch. 1086, § 2, pp. 3676-3678; now Fam. Code, § 4336). The 1987 amendment totally changed th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 4337In force
Except as otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, the obligation of a party under an order for the support of the other party terminates upon the death of either party or the remarriage of the other party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 36 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Briones v. Thornton (California Court of Appeal 2002, 95 Cal. App. 4th 251)“…fe), after her remarriage on March 24, 2000. Husband argues Family Code section 4337 1 terminated his spousal support oblig…”
- In Re Marriage of Benjamins (California Court of Appeal 1994, 26 Cal. App. 4th 423)“…aw upon Annette’s death. (Civ. Code, § 4801, subd. (b) [now Fam. Code, § 4337].) After her death respondent withdrew…”
- Kircher v. Kircher (California Court of Appeal 2010, 189 Cal. App. 4th 1105)“…ion of the parties, 2 waived the provisions of Family Code, section 4337 and provided for continuing support pay…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Cal. Fam. Code § 4320 - Factors for Spousal Support(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Fam. Code § 4330 - Order for Spousal Support(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Fam. Code § 4336 - Retention of Jurisdiction(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Fam. Code § 4337 - Termination on Death or Remarriage(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Fam. Code § 4323 - Cohabitation(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Fam. Code § 4335 - Termination at End of Period(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- SB 711 (Chapter 231, Statutes of 2025) - Taxation: Federal Conformity(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Temporary Spousal Support - California Courts Self Help Guide(selfhelp.courts.ca.gov)
- Taxes and Spousal Support - California Courts Self Help Guide(selfhelp.courts.ca.gov)