North Carolina
Medical Malpractice Laws in North Carolina (2026): Caps
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
North Carolina pairs a strict pleading rule with an inflation-indexed cap on pain-and-suffering damages, and both are easy to get wrong. A patient generally has three years to sue, the complaint must include a Rule 9(j) certification that a qualified expert reviewed the care, and the cap on noneconomic damages under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.19 is $712,847 for 2026, with a narrow exception that removes the cap entirely.
This page is general legal information, not legal advice, and it is part of our Medical Malpractice Laws by State series. The deadlines, the cap amount, and the Rule 9(j) requirement all depend on the facts, so confirm your situation with a licensed North Carolina attorney.
What counts as medical malpractice in North Carolina?
A medical malpractice action in North Carolina is a civil claim against a health care provider for damages caused by the provider's failure to meet the applicable standard of care. That standard is set by N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.12(a): the provider is not liable unless the trier of fact finds, by the greater weight of the evidence, that the care was not in accordance with the standards of practice among members of the same health care profession with similar training and experience situated in the same or similar communities under the same or similar circumstances. The patient must also prove that the failure caused the injury. Physicians, nurses, hospitals, and other licensed providers can be liable. A bad result alone is not malpractice; the question is whether the care fell below the accepted standard.
Emergency care carries a higher burden of proof. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.12(b), where the claim arises out of the furnishing or failure to furnish professional services in the treatment of an emergency medical condition, as that term is defined in 42 U.S.C. 1395dd(e)(1)(A), the claimant must prove the violation of the 90-21.12(a) standard by clear and convincing evidence rather than by the greater weight of the evidence. That is a materially harder standard than the one that applies to ordinary care, and it commonly reaches treatment delivered in a hospital emergency department.
The deadline to sue in North Carolina
A medical malpractice action in North Carolina generally must be filed within three years, measured from the last act of the defendant giving rise to the claim. The three-year period itself comes from N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-52, the state's three-year limitations statute. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-15(c) is what sets the starting point: a malpractice claim accrues at the time of the last act of the defendant, and 1-15(c) adds that nothing in it may be construed to reduce the limitation period below three years.
There is a limited discovery extension. Under 1-15(c), if the injury was not readily apparent at the time and is discovered or should reasonably have been discovered two or more years after the last act, the suit must be commenced within one year of that discovery. That extension does not override the absolute outer deadline described below.
North Carolina also recognizes a continuing-course-of-treatment doctrine that can affect when the clock starts where a provider keeps treating the patient for the same problem. Because the interaction of the three-year limit, the discovery extension, and the repose period is technical, the precise deadline should be confirmed for the individual case.
North Carolina's statute of repose
North Carolina sets an absolute outer deadline that can cut off a claim even before a patient discovers the harm. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-15(c), in no event may a malpractice action be commenced more than four years from the last act of the defendant giving rise to the claim. There is one major exception: where a foreign object that has no therapeutic or diagnostic purpose was left in the patient's body, the outer limit extends to ten years from the last act. This four-year repose is a common trap because it can bar an otherwise valid claim discovered too late.
Damage caps in North Carolina: noneconomic damages are limited
North Carolina caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.19, the total amount of noneconomic damages (pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and similar non-monetary harms) that may be awarded against all defendants is limited. The cap does not limit economic damages such as medical bills and lost earnings, which remain fully recoverable.
The cap is indexed to inflation. The statute sets a base of $500,000 and directs the Office of State Budget and Management to reset the limit on January 1 of every third year, starting January 1, 2014, by multiplying the base by the ratio of the Consumer Price Index for the prior November to the index for November 2011. The current figure is $712,847, effective January 1, 2026; the prior figure was $656,730 for 2023, and the next reset is scheduled for January 1, 2029. Plug the current $712,847 cap into our North Carolina settlement calculator instead of the older, lower figure.
Watch out: The North Carolina noneconomic cap changes every three years, so a figure from an older article is likely out of date. Confirm the current amount, which is $712,847 for 2026, against the statute and the state budget office.
The exception that removes the cap
The noneconomic cap is not absolute. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.19(b), there is no limit on noneconomic damages if the trier of fact finds both that the plaintiff suffered disfigurement, loss of use of part of the body, permanent injury, or death, and that the defendant's acts or failures that proximately caused the injury were committed in reckless disregard of the rights of others, were grossly negligent, fraudulent, intentional, or done with malice. Both conditions must be met. Because this two-part bypass turns on the severity of the harm and the defendant's culpability, it is a fact-intensive question, and whether it applies should be assessed with an attorney.
The Rule 9(j) expert certification
North Carolina requires an expert sign-off before a malpractice complaint is even filed, and missing it can be fatal. Under Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1), a medical malpractice complaint must specifically assert that the medical care and all records have been reviewed by a person who is reasonably expected to qualify as an expert witness and who is willing to testify that the care did not comply with the applicable standard of care. The review must occur before the complaint is filed. A complaint that fails to include a proper Rule 9(j) certification is subject to dismissal, though the rule allows a limited 120-day extension of the limitations period to complete the review in some circumstances.
Who can be liable and the expert requirement
North Carolina malpractice claims can target individual clinicians and the institutions responsible for care, including physicians, nurses, hospitals, and clinics. To prove a claim, the plaintiff generally must present qualified expert testimony establishing the applicable standard of care in the same or similar community and showing that the provider's breach caused the injury. The Rule 9(j) certification reflects that same requirement at the pleading stage, so qualified expert review is needed before suit and again at trial.
Contributory negligence in North Carolina
North Carolina is one of the few states that still follows the strict doctrine of contributory negligence. Under that rule, a plaintiff who is found even slightly at fault for the injury can be barred entirely from recovering, which is a much harsher rule than the comparative-negligence systems used in most states. In a malpractice case, defendants may argue the patient contributed to the harm, so how fault is framed can be significant, though the central disputes usually remain the standard of care and causation.
Wrongful-death medical malpractice in North Carolina
When malpractice causes death, the claim is brought as a wrongful-death action under N.C. Gen. Stat. 28A-18-2 by the personal representative of the estate; the two-year limitation from the date of death comes from N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-53(4), which cross-references 28A-18-2 for the underlying cause of action. The categories of recoverable damages and the proper claimant differ from a personal-injury malpractice claim, and a wrongful-death malpractice claim still must satisfy the Rule 9(j) requirement. Because the deadlines and damages differ, identify the correct framework early.
How to evaluate and preserve a possible claim
While every situation is different and this is general information rather than legal advice, people who suspect malpractice in North Carolina often begin by gathering complete medical records and noting key dates, because the three-year limit and the four-year repose can be unforgiving. Because Rule 9(j) requires a qualified expert to review the care before the complaint is filed, an attorney typically arranges that review early. Malpractice cases are commonly handled on a contingency-fee basis, though no attorney can promise a particular outcome or dollar amount. To keep the Rule 9(j) step ahead of those deadlines, get a free consultation from a North Carolina medical malpractice lawyer who can arrange the expert review early (attorney advertising).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for medical malpractice in North Carolina?
Generally three years, measured from the last act of the defendant. The three-year period comes from N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-52; N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-15(c) supplies the accrual rule, the discovery extension, and the outer limits. If the injury was not apparent and is discovered two or more years later, suit must be filed within one year of discovery, but never more than four years from the last act (ten years for a foreign object). Confirm your exact deadline with a North Carolina attorney.
Does North Carolina cap medical malpractice damages?
Yes, it caps noneconomic (pain and suffering) damages under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.19. The cap is inflation-indexed and reset every three years; it is $712,847 effective January 1, 2026 (up from $656,730 in 2023). Economic damages such as medical bills and lost income are not capped, and the cap does not apply in certain severe, reckless cases.
When does the North Carolina cap not apply?
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.19(b), there is no limit on noneconomic damages if the trier of fact finds both that the plaintiff suffered disfigurement, loss of use of part of the body, permanent injury, or death, and that the defendant acted in reckless disregard, with gross negligence, fraud, intent, or malice. Both parts must be found.
Do I need an expert affidavit to file in North Carolina?
Yes. Under Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, the complaint must assert that a qualified expert reviewed the medical care before filing and is willing to testify that it did not meet the standard of care. A complaint without a proper Rule 9(j) certification is subject to dismissal, though a limited 120-day extension may apply.
What is the North Carolina statute of repose for malpractice?
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-15(c), no malpractice action may be commenced more than four years from the last act of the defendant, regardless of when the injury is discovered. The outer limit extends to ten years where a foreign object with no therapeutic purpose was left in the body.
How much is a medical malpractice case worth in North Carolina?
There is no set figure. Economic damages are not capped, while noneconomic damages are generally limited to the current cap ($712,847 for 2026) unless the severe-and-reckless exception applies. Value depends on the evidence and disputed liability and causation, and no attorney can guarantee a result or a dollar amount.
Can I recover if I was partly at fault in North Carolina?
North Carolina follows contributory negligence, one of the strictest rules in the country. A plaintiff found even slightly at fault for the injury can be barred entirely from recovering. The central disputes in a malpractice case usually remain the standard of care and causation.
What is the deadline for a wrongful-death malpractice claim in North Carolina?
A wrongful-death claim is brought by the estate's personal representative under N.C. Gen. Stat. 28A-18-2, generally within two years of the date of death under N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-53(4), and it must still satisfy Rule 9(j). Because the deadline and recoverable damages differ from a personal-injury claim, confirm the correct framework with an attorney.
Updates
Corrected the source of the three-year filing deadline (N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-52, with 1-15(c) governing accrual and the repose periods) and added the standard of care under N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.12, including the clear-and-convincing burden that applies to emergency medical care.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Re-attributed North Carolina's two-year wrongful-death filing deadline to its actual source, N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-53(4), rather than 28A-18-2 (which establishes who may sue and what damages are recoverable but contains no limitations period).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 90: Medicine and Allied Occupations.
§ 90-21.12Standard of health careIn force
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, in any medical malpractice action as defined in G.S. 90-21.11(2)(a), the defendant health care provider shall not be liable for the payment of damages unless the trier of fact finds by the greater weight of the evidence that the care of such health care provider was not in accordance with the standards of practice among members of the same health care profession with similar training and experience situated in the same or similar communities under the same or similar circumstances at the time of the alleged act giving rise to the cause of action; or in the case of a medical malpractice action as defined in G.S. 90-21.11(2)(b), the defendant health care provider shall not be liable for the payment of damages unless the trier of fact finds by the greater weight of the evidence that the action or inaction of such health care provider was not in accordance with the standards of practice among similar health care providers situated in the same or similar communities under the same or similar circumstances at the time of the alleged act giving rise to the cause of action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
§ 90-21.19Liability limit for noneconomic damagesIn force
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, in any medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff is entitled to an award of noneconomic damages, the total amount of noneconomic damages for which judgment is entered against all defendants shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). Judgment shall not be entered against any defendant for noneconomic damages in excess of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for all claims brought by all parties arising out of the same professional services. On January 1 of every third year, beginning with January 1, 2014, the Office of State Budget and Management shall reset the limitation on damages for noneconomic loss set forth in this subsection to be equal to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) times the ratio of the Consumer Price Index for November of the prior year to the Consumer Price Index for November 2011. The Office of State Budget and Management shall inform the Revisor of Statutes of the reset limitation. The Revisor of Statutes shall publish this reset limitation as an editor's note to this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mohebali v. Hayes (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2025)“…out of the same professional services. N.C.G.S. § 90-21.19(a) (hereinafter the “Legislative Cap”).…”
- Glynn v. Savaseniorcare Consulting, LLC (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2021)“…serves the right to raise a constitutional challenge to N.C.G.S. § 90-21.19 if and when the jury returns a verdict…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 1: Civil Procedure.
§ 1-15Statute runs from accrual of actionIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Civil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this Chapter, after the cause of action has accrued, except where in special cases a different limitation is prescribed by statute. (b) Repealed by Session Laws 1979, c. 654, s. 3. (c) Except where otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action for malpractice arising out of the performance of or failure to perform professional services shall be deemed to accrue at the time of the occurrence of the last act of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action: Provided that whenever there is bodily injury to the person, economic or monetary loss, or a defect in or damage to property which originates under circumstances making the injury, loss, defect or damage not readily apparent to the claimant at the time of its origin, and the injury, loss, defect or damage is discovered or should reasonably be discovered by the claimant two or more years after the occurrence of the last act of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action, suit must be commenced within one year from the date discovery is made: Provided nothing herein shall be construed to reduce the statute of limitation in any such case below…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 185 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Black v. Littlejohn (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1985, 312 N.C. 626)“…ed as follows: The clear purpose of the exception in G.S. 1-15(c) allowing for a four-year limitation…”
- Ballenger v. Crowell (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 1978, 38 N.C. App. 50)“…0 years of the last act of the defendant. This amendment to G.S. 1-15 was effective 22 July 1971. Subs…”
- Wilder v. Amatex Corp. (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1985, 314 N.C. 550)“…ively on the ten-year statute of repose contained in former N.C.Gen.Stat. § 1-15(b). In these orders the trial court rec…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, North Carolina Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 1-53Two yearsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
Within two years - (1) An action against a local unit of government upon a contract, obligation or liability arising out of a contract, express or implied. Unless otherwise provided by law, if the preceding sentence of this subsection would bar commencement of a cause of action arising out of a contract to improve real property: (i) such an action may be brought no later than 90 days after substantial completion, provided proper notice of the claim has been given if required by contract, or (ii) if prior to substantial completion the contract was terminated by either party, such an action may be brought no later than 90 days after the date of termination of the contract. As used in this subdivision, "substantial completion" has the same meaning as in G.S. 1-50(a)(5)c. This subdivision shall not apply to actions based upon bonds, notes and interest coupons or when a different period of limitation is prescribed by this Article. (2) An action to recover the penalty for usury, including an action regarding the financing of usurious points, usurious fees, or other usurious charges; the two-year period shall accrue with each payment made and accepted on the loan.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 111 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co. (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1976, 291 N.C. 180)“…statute of limitation bears upon plaintiff’s action except G.S. 1-53(4), which prescribed a two-year period…”
- Dunn v. Pacific Employers Insurance (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1992, 332 N.C. 129)“…atal illness was diagnosed and therefore time-barred by N.C.G.S. § 1-53(4). The trial court granted these motio…”
- Dennis v. City of Albemarle (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1955, 242 N.C. 263)“…issioners as required by this charter provision and also by G.S. 1-53. G.S. 1-53, presently codified a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Truck Accident Laws in North Carolina (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Motorcycle Accident Laws in North Carolina (2026): Deadlines
§ 1-52Three yearsIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
Within three years an action - (1) Upon a contract, obligation or liability arising out of a contract, express or implied, except those mentioned in the preceding sections or in G.S. 1-53(1). (1a) Upon the official bond of a public officer. (2) Upon a liability created by statute, either state or federal, unless some other time is mentioned in the statute creating it. (3) For trespass upon real property. When the trespass is a continuing one, the action shall be commenced within three years from the original trespass, and not thereafter. (4) For taking, detaining, converting or injuring any goods or chattels, including action for their specific recovery. (5) For criminal conversation, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract and not hereafter enumerated, except as provided by G.S. 1-17(d) and (e). (6) Against the sureties of any executor, administrator, collector or guardian on the official bond of their principal; within three years after the breach thereof complained of.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 868 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Forbis v. Neal (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2007, 361 N.C. 519)“…hat the statute of limitations bars plaintiffs’ action. N.C.G.S. § 1-52(9) provides that actions for “relief on…”
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc. (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1985, 313 N.C. 488)“…This common law rule is modified by the provisions of N.C.G.S. § 1-52(1), (5), and (16), which provide:…”
- Barger v. McCoy Hillard & Parks (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1997, 346 N.C. 650)“…e and was thus subject to the statute of limitations in N.C.G.S. § 1-52(5). Plaintiffs argue further that a cau…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability in a Pure-Contributory State, North Carolina Debt Collection Laws: No Wage Garnishment Procedure, and the Piercers That Reach Anyway, North Carolina Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, How to Sue
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 28A: Administration of Decedents' Estates.
§ 28A-18-2Death by wrongful act of another; recovery not assetsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) When the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default of another, such as would, if the injured person had lived, have entitled the injured person to an action for damages therefor, the person or corporation that would have been so liable, and the personal representatives or collectors of the person or corporation that would have been so liable, shall be liable to an action for damages, to be brought by the personal representative or collector of the decedent; and this notwithstanding the death, and although the wrongful act, neglect or default, causing the death, amounts in law to a felony. The personal representative or collector of the decedent who pursues an action under this section may pay from the assets of the estate the reasonable and necessary expenses, not including attorneys' fees, incurred in pursuing the action. At the termination of the action, any amount recovered shall be applied first to the reimbursement of the estate for the expenses incurred in pursuing the action, then to the payment of attorneys' fees, and shall then be distributed as provided in this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 149 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Azzolino v. Dingfelder (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1985, 315 N.C. 103)“…comfort, guidance and kindly offices of the decedent. N.C.G.S. § 28A-18-2(b)(2), (4). They routinely determine pa…”
- DiDonato v. Wortman (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1987, 320 N.C. 423)“…rson” within the meaning of the wrongful death statute, N.C.G.S. § 28A-18-2(b). On this issue, I deem it not inap *…”
- Carver v. Carver (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1984, 310 N.C. 669)“…Arnold and (now Justice) H. C. Martin, reasoned as follows: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 28A-18-2 (successor to 28-173 and 28-174) author…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines
United States Code Title 42
§ 1395ddExamination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in laborIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
In the case of a hospital that has a hospital emergency department, if any individual (whether or not eligible for benefits under this subchapter) comes to the emergency department and a request is made on the individual’s behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, the hospital must provide for an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition (within the meaning of subsection (e)(1)) exists. If any individual (whether or not eligible for benefits under this subchapter) comes to a hospital and the hospital determines that the individual has an emergency medical condition, the hospital must provide either— within the staff and facilities available at the hospital, for such further medical examination and such treatment as may be required to stabilize the medical condition, or for transfer of the individual to another medical facility in accordance with subsection (c).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,072 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (Supreme Court of the United States 2012, 567 U.S. 519)“…ividuals without regard to their ability to pay, see, e.g., 42 U. S. C. §1395dd; Fla. Stat. Ann. §395.1041, hospitals e…”
- Correa v. Hospital San Francisco (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 1995, 69 F.3d 1184)“…ergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. 1395dd (1988 & Supp. V 1993).1 After s…”
- Winifred Hardy v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. And Queens Hospital Center (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1999, 164 F.3d 789)“…mergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd. Specifically, Hardy asserted that the H…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.19, liability limit for noneconomic damages, CPI reset every third year, and the disfigurement/death plus reckless-conduct exception(ncleg.gov).gov
- North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management: noneconomic damages cap is $712,847 effective January 1, 2026 (was $656,730 in 2023), next reset January 1, 2029(osbm.nc.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-15(c), three-year malpractice limitation, one-year discovery extension, four-year repose, and ten-year foreign-object outer limit(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 9(j), special pleading and expert pre-review certification for medical malpractice complaints(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 28A-18-2, wrongful-death action brought by the personal representative(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-21.12, standard of health care: (a) greater weight of the evidence, same or similar communities; (b) clear and convincing evidence for treatment of an emergency medical condition as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1395dd(e)(1)(A)(ncleg.gov)
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-52, the three-year limitations statute that supplies the three-year period for a North Carolina medical malpractice action(ncleg.gov)
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-15(c), malpractice accrual at the last act, one-year discovery extension, four-year statute of repose, and ten-year foreign-object outer limit(ncleg.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.