Maine
Motorcycle Accident Laws in Maine (2026): Deadlines & Helmets
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

If you were hurt in a motorcycle crash in Maine, two rules will drive your case more than any others: the deadline to sue and the state's fault rule. Maine is unusual on both. It gives you a long six-year window to file a personal injury suit, but it uses a strict comparative-negligence rule under which being found equally at fault with the other driver bars your recovery entirely. That six-year window does not apply when the defendant is a government body, such as a police cruiser, a town plow, or a transit bus, where a two-year deadline and a much earlier written notice requirement control instead. Maine also requires helmets only for younger and newer riders. This guide explains how those rules apply to riders. It is general legal information and attorney advertising, not legal advice.
The deadline to sue in Maine is six years
Maine sets one of the most generous personal injury deadlines in the country. Under 14 M.R.S. section 752, most civil actions, including a motorcycle injury claim, must be filed within six years after the cause of action accrues. That is far longer than the two- or three-year windows used in most states, but it is still a hard cutoff, and waiting is rarely wise because evidence fades and witnesses move.
Section 752 applies "except as otherwise specially provided," and the most important exception for riders is a crash involving a government defendant. If the other vehicle was a police cruiser, a town plow, a school bus, a transit bus, or another public vehicle, or if your claim is against a state or municipal road authority, the Maine Tort Claims Act controls. Under 14 M.R.S. section 8110, a claim against a governmental entity or its employees is forever barred unless suit is begun within two years after the cause of action accrues, and under 14 M.R.S. section 8107 a written notice of claim must be filed within 365 days after the claim accrues, absent good cause. Damages in those cases are also capped at $400,000 for all claims arising out of a single occurrence under 14 M.R.S. section 8105. A rider who relies on the six-year rule against a government defendant can lose the claim outright, so identify who owned the other vehicle early. If a government vehicle or road authority is involved, ask a Maine motorcycle lawyer for a free claim review on filing the written notice of claim within those 365 days (attorney advertising).
A wrongful death claim is different and much shorter. Under 18-C M.R.S. section 2-807, a wrongful death action must be commenced within three years after the decedent's death, with a longer window only in limited circumstances such as a death resulting from homicide. Because the rules differ, anyone handling a fatal crash should confirm the applicable deadline with a Maine attorney promptly.
Maine's fault rule can bar recovery at equal fault
Maine follows a comparative-negligence rule with an unusual twist. Under 14 M.R.S. section 156, if a claimant is found by the jury to be equally at fault with the defendant, the claimant may not recover at all. In most modified-comparative states the bar falls at 50 percent or 51 percent; Maine's rule effectively bars recovery once a rider's fault reaches the same level as the other party. Below that point, the jury reduces the total damages to the extent it considers just and equitable, reducing by dollars rather than by a strict percentage.

This matters for motorcyclists because insurers often try to push a rider's share of fault up toward the equal-fault line, sometimes leaning on stereotypes about speed or risk-taking. Careful documentation of how the crash happened is the rider's best protection.
Maine's helmet law covers younger and newer riders
Maine has a partial helmet law rather than a universal one. Under 29-A M.R.S. section 2083, protective headgear is required for operators and passengers under 18, for an operator riding on a learner's permit, and for an operator within one year of passing the license test, along with the passengers of those required riders. Other adult riders may legally ride without a helmet.
Because some adults may ride lawfully without a helmet, the question of whether a rider's failure to wear one can be used against them can arise here. Maine has no statute that bars a defendant from raising helmet non-use, and where evidence shows a helmet would have prevented or reduced an injury, that argument may be made through the comparative-fault and mitigation rules. Wearing a helmet protects both your safety and your claim, even where the law does not require it.
Lane splitting is not permitted in Maine
Maine does not authorize lane splitting or lane filtering. Under 29-A M.R.S. section 2062, a person may not operate a motorcycle between lanes of traffic or between adjacent lines or rows of vehicles. Because the practice is not legal, a crash that happened while a rider was splitting lanes can be used to assign fault to the rider, which under Maine's equal-fault rule could reduce or even bar recovery.
No-fault insurance and motorcycles
Maine is an at-fault, or tort, state. It does not use a no-fault (PIP) system, so an injured rider generally recovers from the at-fault driver and that driver's liability insurance. Maine does require a small amount of medical payments coverage, at least $2,000 per person under 29-A M.R.S. section 1605-A, which pays initial medical costs regardless of fault but is modest. Maine's minimum liability limits are among the higher ones nationally, at $50,000 for bodily injury per person, $100,000 per accident, and $25,000 for property damage, per the Maine Bureau of Insurance, and Maine also requires uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, which can be important for a seriously hurt rider.

Damage caps in Maine
Maine does not cap compensatory damages in an ordinary personal injury case, so medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering are not subject to a general statutory ceiling. Maine's wrongful death statute does cap certain categories of damages, including limits on loss-of-comfort and punitive awards, so those rules can apply in a fatal-crash case. A separate cap applies when the defendant is a governmental entity or its employee, where 14 M.R.S. section 8105 limits the total award, including costs, to $400,000 for any and all claims arising out of a single occurrence. A Maine attorney can explain whether any cap touches your specific claim.
Why motorcycle cases are different and how to evaluate yours
Motorcycle crashes tend to cause severe injuries because a rider has little protection, which means higher medical costs and larger potential claims, and also a tougher insurance defense. The classic crash is a car turning left across an oncoming rider's path, often with the driver claiming they never saw the motorcycle. Riders also face documented bias among some adjusters and jurors, which is one more reason careful documentation matters, especially under Maine's equal-fault rule.

If you or a family member was hurt, get medical care and keep the records, obtain the crash report, photograph the scene, the bike, and your gear, and save your helmet and riding gear. Then speak promptly with a licensed Maine attorney, both because of the filing deadlines and because early evidence can be decisive. Most motorcycle accident attorneys offer a free consultation and work on a contingency basis, meaning no upfront fee and payment only out of any recovery. No outcome can be promised, and this article is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue after a motorcycle accident in Maine?
Six years from the date the claim accrues for a personal injury suit, under 14 M.R.S. section 752, which is one of the longest deadlines in the country. That six-year rule does not apply if the defendant is a governmental entity or its employee, such as a police cruiser, a town plow, or a road authority: suit must be begun within two years (14 M.R.S. section 8110) and a written notice of claim is due within 365 days (14 M.R.S. section 8107). A wrongful death claim is also much shorter, generally three years from the date of death under 18-C M.R.S. section 2-807. Confirm the deadline that applies to your case with a Maine attorney rather than relying on the longest window.
Is failing to wear a helmet going to hurt my case in Maine?
It can. Maine requires helmets only for riders under 18 and for newly licensed or permit riders and their passengers (29-A M.R.S. section 2083), so many adults may ride without one. There is no statute barring a defendant from raising helmet non-use, and where evidence shows a helmet would have prevented or reduced an injury, an insurer may argue it through Maine's comparative-fault and mitigation rules. Wearing a helmet protects your safety and your claim.
Is lane splitting legal in Maine?
No. Maine does not permit lane splitting or lane filtering, and a motorcycle may not be operated between lanes or rows of vehicles (29-A M.R.S. section 2062). If a crash happened while a rider was splitting lanes, that conduct can be used to assign fault, which under Maine's equal-fault rule could reduce or eliminate recovery.
How much is a motorcycle accident case worth in Maine?
There is no set figure. Value depends on the injuries, the evidence, your share of fault under Maine's equal-fault rule, and the available insurance, and no one can promise an amount. Motorcycle injuries are often severe, which can mean larger claims, but every case turns on its own facts. If the defendant is a governmental entity, Maine also caps the total award at $400,000 for all claims arising out of a single occurrence (14 M.R.S. section 8105).
Updates
Added the Maine Tort Claims Act exception to the six-year filing deadline: a crash involving a government vehicle or road authority requires suit within 2 years and a written notice of claim within 365 days, and is subject to a $400,000 damages cap.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL, Part 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS, Chapter 7: DEFENSES GENERALLY
§ 156Comparative negligenceIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
When any person suffers death or damage as a result partly of that person's own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons, a claim in respect of that death or damage may not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect thereof must be reduced to such extent as the jury thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage. [PL 1999, c. 633, §1 (AMD); PL 1999, c. 633, §3 (AFF).] When damages are recoverable by any person by virtue of this section, subject to such reduction as is mentioned, the court shall instruct the jury to find and record the total damages that would have been recoverable if the claimant had not been at fault, and further instruct the jury to reduce the total damages by dollars and cents, and not by percentage, to the extent considered just and equitable, having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damages, and instruct the jury to return both amounts with the knowledge that the lesser figure is the final verdict in the case. [PL 1999, c. 633, §1 (AMD); PL 1999, c.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 132 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1984, 471 A.2d 280)“…aine law: Is Maine’s comparative negligence statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 [1980], applicable to plaintiff’s claim…”
- Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2000, 748 A.2d 961)“…give rise to the defense of contributory negligence. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 (1980). If the plaintiff's fault is equ…”
- Pelletier v. Fort Kent Golf Club (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1995, 662 A.2d 220)“…use the damage award to Jeannine violates the provisions of 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 (1980) and the jury’s failure to award…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Maine Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Medical Malpractice Laws in Maine (2026): Deadlines & Caps
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 29-A: MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, Chapter 19: OPERATION
§ 2083Protective headgearIn force
1. Requirement. The following persons must wear protective headgear: A. If under 18 years of age, a passenger on a motorcycle or moped or in an attached side car; [PL 2017, c. 51, §1 (AMD).] B. If under 18 years of age, an operator of a motorcycle or moped; [PL 2017, c. 51, §2 (AMD).] C. An operator of a motorcycle or moped, operating under a learner's permit or within one year of successfully completing a driving test; and [PL 2017, c. 51, §3 (AMD).] D. A passenger of an operator required to wear headgear. [PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).] This subsection does not apply to the operation of an autocycle. 2. Compliance. An operator of a motorcycle or moped or a parent or guardian may not allow a passenger under the age of 18 years to ride in violation of this section. 3. Standard. Protective headgear must conform with minimum standards of construction and performance as prescribed by the American National Standards Institute specifications Z 90.1 or by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 218. 4. Public program.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2006
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Piche v. Nugent (District Court, D. Maine 2006, 436 F. Supp. 2d 193)“…prise to wear a helmet while riding on his motorcycle, see 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2083, and because the failure to wear a helm…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2062MotorcyclesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. Seating. Seating on a motorcycle is as follows. A. A person operating a motorcycle may ride only on the permanent and regular seat attached. [PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).] B. More than 2 persons may not ride on a motorcycle. [PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).] C. The number of passengers in a sidecar attached to a motorcycle may not exceed the number of permanent seats for which the sidecar has been designed, to a maximum of 2 persons. [PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).] D. A passenger may only ride on permanent seating with no more than one passenger occupying each seat. [PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).] 2. Headlight. When the motorcycle is on a public way, the motorcycle's headlight must be on. 3. Handlebars. A person may not operate on a public way a motorcycle equipped with handlebars whose handgrips are higher than the shoulder level of the operator. 4. Lane use; motorcycles and mopeds. Lane use by motorcycles and mopeds is restricted as follows. A. An operator of a motorcycle other than a moped may fully use a lane.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Also relied on in: Is Lane Splitting Legal in Maine? (2026 Motorcycle Law)
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL, Part 2: PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL, Chapter 205: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
§ 752Six yearsIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
All civil actions shall be commenced within 6 years after the cause of action accrues and not afterwards, except actions on a judgment or decree of any court of record of the United States, or of any state, or of a justice of the peace in this State, and except as otherwise specially provided.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 286 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McAfee v. Cole (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1994, 637 A.2d 463)“…general six-year limitations period for all civil actions, 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (1980). After the order of dismissal, M…”
- Myrick v. James (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1982, 444 A.2d 987)“…om the purview of the general six year limitations statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 752, and situated them in a position simila…”
- Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2005, 871 A.2d 1208)“…tends that the six-year statute of limitations set forth in 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (2003) applies to this case. The Dioces…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Maine Final Paycheck Laws: Deadline and Double Damages, Maine Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 18-C: PROBATE CODE, Part 8: GENERAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING PROBATE AND NONPROBATE TRANSFERS
§ 2-807Actions for wrongful deathIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
1. Liability notwithstanding death. Whenever the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, then the person or the corporation that would have been liable if death had not ensued is liable for damages as provided in this section, notwithstanding the death of the person injured and although the death was caused under circumstances that amount to a felony. 2. Wrongful death action; damages; limitations. Every wrongful death action must be brought by and in the name of the personal representative or special administrator of the deceased person, and is distributable, after payment for funeral expenses and the costs of recovery including attorney's fees, directly to the decedent's heirs without becoming part of the probate estate, except as may be specifically provided in this subsection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Also relied on in: Maine Punitive Damages Laws: Malice Rule and Caps (2026), Maine Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability, Maine Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 29-A: MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, Chapter 13: FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND INSURANCE
§ 1605-AMedical paymentsIn force
A motor vehicle liability policy issued for a motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this State must provide coverage in an amount equal to or greater than $2,000 per person for medical costs incurred as a result of injuries sustained in an accident involving the insured vehicle by the driver and passengers in that vehicle. The coverage required by this section only applies to medical costs incurred during one year following the date the injuries are sustained. This section does not apply to a policy insuring more than 4 motor vehicles, nor to any policy covering a garage, automobile sales agency, repair shop, service station or public parking place. [PL 2007, c. 213, §2 (AMD); PL 2007, c. 213, §3 (AFF).]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2007
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tibbetts v. Worcester (Superior Court of Maine 2007)“…icies. Tibbetts argues that the limitation violates 29-A M.R.S. § 1605-A, which provides in pertinent part:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL, Part 7: PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS, Chapter 741: TORT CLAIMS
§ 8105Limitation on damagesIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
1. Limit established. In any claim or cause of action permitted by this chapter, the award of damages, including costs, against either a governmental entity or its employees, or both, may not exceed $400,000 for any and all claims arising out of a single occurrence. 1-A. Limit established for out-of-state transit district or regional transportation corporation. 2. Costs. Court costs, prejudgment interest and all other costs that a court may assess must be included within the damage limit specified by this section. Accrued post-judgment interest may not be included within the damage limit. 3. Claims in excess of limit. When a claimant or several claimants believe they may have a claim against the State in excess of the limit established in subsection 1, or for a claim for which the State is immune, they may apply to the Legislature for special authorization to proceed within another specified limit. 4. Apportionment of claims.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tolliver v. Department of Transportation (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2008, 948 A.2d 1223)“…d against MDOT to $400,000, the maximum amount permitted by 14 M.R.S. § 8105. We vacate the judgment. I. BACKGR…”
- Michael Fortin v. Jacob Titcomb (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2013, 60 A.3d 765)“…ges are instead determined by the greater amount allowed by 14 M.R.S. § 8105(1) or 14 M.R.S. § 8116. Title 14 M.R.S.…”
- Rippett v. Bemis (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1996, 672 A.2d 82)“…against a “government entity” may include punitive damages. 14 M.R.S.A. § 8105(5) (1980). “Government entity,” however…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Maine (2026): Deadlines & Liability
§ 8107Notice to governmental entityIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
1. Notice requirements for filing. Within 365 days after any claim or cause of action permitted by this chapter accrues, or at a later time within the limits of section 8110, when a claimant shows good cause why notice could not have reasonably been filed within the 365-day limit, a claimant or a claimant's personal representative or attorney shall file a written notice containing: A. The name and address of the claimant, and the name and address of the claimant's attorney or other representative, if any; [PL 1989, c. 327 (AMD).] B. A concise statement of the basis of the claim, including the date, time, place and circumstances of the act, omission or occurrence complained of; [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] C. The name and address of any governmental employee involved, if known; [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] D. A concise statement of the nature and extent of the injury claimed to have been suffered; and [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] E. A statement of the amount of monetary damages claimed. [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] 2. Incapacity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 100 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1987, 535 A.2d 421)“…orney General notice pursuant to the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107 (1980), of a claim against AMHI, Commis…”
- Beaulieu v. the Aube Corp. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2002, 796 A.2d 683)“…period was modeled after the Maine Tort Claims Act (MTCA), 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107. 7 Report of a Study by th…”
- Heber v. Lucerne-In-Maine Village Corp. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2000, 2000 Me. 137)“…to follow the MTCA’s notice requirements. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107. These arguments are not persuasive.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 8110Limitation of actionsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Every claim against a governmental entity or its employees permitted under this chapter is forever barred from the courts of this State, unless an action therein is begun within 2 years after the cause of action accrues, except that, if the claimant is a minor when the cause of action accrues, the action may be brought within 2 years of the minor's attaining 18 years of age. [PL 2001, c. 249, §2 (AMD).]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 44 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McLaughlin v. Superintending School Committee (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2003, 832 A.2d 782)“…from the date the cause of action accrued. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (2003). The Act is unambiguous. Accordi…”
- Couturier v. Penobscot Indian Nation (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1988, 544 A.2d 306)“…ourt determined that plaintiffs’ suit was time barred under 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (1980), the two-year statute of limitat…”
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1987, 535 A.2d 421)“…wo-year limitations period relied on by the Superior Court. 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110. Plaintiff argues, however, that under…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- 14 M.R.S. § 752, six-year limitation period for most civil actions (Maine State Legislature)(mainelegislature.org).gov
- 14 M.R.S. § 156, comparative negligence; recovery barred if the claimant is equally at fault (Maine State Legislature)(mainelegislature.org).gov
- 29-A M.R.S. § 2083, protective headgear required for riders under 18 and newly licensed or permit riders and their passengers (Maine State Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 29-A M.R.S. § 2062, operation of motorcycles; no operating between lanes or rows of vehicles (Maine State Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 29-A M.R.S. § 1605-A, required medical payments coverage of at least $2,000 per person (Maine State Legislature)(mainelegislature.org).gov
- Maine Bureau of Insurance, minimum auto liability coverage required by law(maine.gov).gov
- 14 M.R.S. § 8110, claims against a governmental entity or its employees barred unless an action is begun within 2 years after the cause of action accrues (Maine State Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov)
- 14 M.R.S. § 8107, written notice of claim required within 365 days after a claim against a governmental entity accrues (Maine State Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov)
- 14 M.R.S. § 8105, damages against a governmental entity or its employees capped at $400,000 for any and all claims arising out of a single occurrence (Maine State Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.