Illinois
Motorcycle Accident Laws in Illinois (2026): Deadlines & Helmets
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 8, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A motorcycle crash in Illinois is a personal injury case, but riders face questions a car driver never does, and Illinois is unusual on one of them: the state has no helmet law for any rider. On top of that sit the questions that decide most claims, the deadline to sue and how Illinois apportions fault, plus whether lane splitting is legal and how no-fault rules apply. This guide is general legal information and attorney advertising, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The deadline to sue in Illinois
Illinois sets a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims under 735 ILCS 5/13-202, running from the date of injury. For a fatal crash, the Illinois Wrongful Death Act (740 ILCS 180) sets a two-year deadline measured from the date of death, with a longer period in cases involving violent intentional conduct. Different and shorter deadlines apply against government entities, where a one-year limitation often governs claims against a local public body. A blown deadline almost always ends a case no matter how strong it is, so confirm the exact date early with a licensed Illinois attorney.
How fault affects recovery
Illinois follows modified comparative fault under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. The statute bars recovery if the injured person's contributory fault is more than 50 percent of the total proximate cause of the injury, and it reduces any recovery in proportion to the injured person's share of fault. In plain terms, this is a 51 percent bar: you can recover so long as you are not more than half at fault, but at 51 percent or more you recover nothing. Below that line, your award drops by your percentage, so a 200,000 dollar award with 20 percent fault on you becomes 160,000 dollars.

This rule matters more for riders than for most drivers because some adjusters and jurors carry a bias against motorcyclists, assuming the rider was speeding or weaving. Shifting blame onto the rider lowers the payout, and pushing the rider past 50 percent erases it, which is why documenting that the rider was riding lawfully is so important.
No-fault and motorcycles
Illinois is an at-fault, or tort, state. It does not run a no-fault system and does not require personal injury protection (PIP), so there is no PIP threshold to clear before suing. An injured rider pursues the at-fault driver and that driver's liability insurer, and may also draw on uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage. Because Illinois has no no-fault scheme, the motorcycle-versus-car PIP complications seen in states like Florida or Michigan do not arise here.
Helmet law and the helmet defense
Illinois has no motorcycle helmet law. No rider, of any age, is required to wear a helmet, which makes Illinois one of only a handful of states with no helmet requirement at all. State law does require eye protection: under 625 ILCS 5/11-1404, a motorcycle operator and every passenger must be protected by glasses, goggles, or a transparent shield unless the bike has a windscreen extending above the eyes.
Because a helmet is not required for anyone in Illinois, a defendant generally cannot use a rider's failure to wear one to reduce damages. A rider who chose to ride without a helmet broke no law, so non-use is not a basis to shift fault or cut a recovery, and the central question stays focused on who caused the crash. Riders should still expect an insurer to raise helmet use informally, especially with head injuries, which is one more reason careful medical and causation evidence matters.
Lane splitting in Illinois
Lane splitting, riding a motorcycle between lanes of slow or stopped traffic, is not permitted in Illinois. Illinois law requires a vehicle to be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single marked lane under 625 ILCS 5/11-709, and the rules of the road do not authorize riding between lanes. Where a rider was splitting lanes at the time of a crash, expect the other side to argue the rider contributed to it, which can reduce recovery or, at more than 50 percent fault, bar it entirely under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116.

Damage caps and insurance
Illinois does not cap compensatory damages in personal injury cases. The Illinois Supreme Court has struck down statutory caps on noneconomic damages as unconstitutional, so an injured rider's economic and noneconomic damages are not limited by a statutory cap. Illinois requires minimum auto liability coverage of 25,000 dollars for injury to one person, 50,000 dollars per accident, and 20,000 dollars for property damage, written 25/50/20, and also mandates uninsured motorist coverage at 25,000 dollars per person and 50,000 dollars per accident. Serious motorcycle injuries routinely exceed those minimums, so a badly hurt rider often has to look to the at-fault driver's full policy, the rider's own underinsured motorist coverage, or both.
Why motorcycle cases are different
A motorcycle offers little protection, so crashes tend to cause severe injuries, large medical bills, and long recoveries, which means higher-stakes claims and a more aggressive insurance defense. Layered on top are rider-specific issues: Illinois has no helmet rule, lane-splitting allegations can surface, and there is a documented bias against motorcyclists. The classic crash is a car turning left across an oncoming rider's path, with the driver claiming they never saw the bike. Because so much turns on who had the right of way and on the rider's percentage of fault, physical evidence and a clear record carry real weight.
Evidence and how to evaluate your options
If you or a family member was hurt in an Illinois motorcycle crash, get medical care and keep every record, obtain the police report, and photograph the scene, the bike, your gear, and your injuries. Save the other driver's information and any witness contacts, and preserve any helmet-camera or dash-camera footage. If the driver claims they never saw you, have an Illinois motorcycle lawyer look at that footage in a free claim review within the two years (attorney advertising). Many motorcycle injury attorneys offer a free consultation and work on a contingency basis, meaning no upfront fee and payment only out of any recovery. No one can promise an outcome or a dollar figure, and this guide is general information, not legal advice.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue after a motorcycle accident in Illinois?
Two years. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-202 a personal injury suit must be filed within two years of the injury, and the Illinois Wrongful Death Act (740 ILCS 180) sets a two-year deadline from the date of death. Claims against a local government body often carry a shorter one-year limit. Missing the deadline usually ends the case, so confirm the date with an Illinois attorney.
Is failing to wear a helmet going to hurt my case in Illinois?
Generally no. Illinois has no helmet law for any rider, so a rider who rode without a helmet broke no law, and a defendant generally cannot use that choice to reduce your damages. Illinois does require eye protection under 625 ILCS 5/11-1404. The main issue in your case will be who caused the crash, not whether you wore a helmet.
Is lane splitting legal in Illinois?
No. Illinois requires a vehicle to be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane under 625 ILCS 5/11-709, and riding between lanes of traffic is not authorized. If a rider was splitting lanes when a crash happened, the other side can use it to shift fault onto the rider, which reduces recovery or, at more than 50 percent fault, bars it entirely.
How much is a motorcycle accident case worth in Illinois?
There is no set figure. Value depends on the injuries, the evidence, your share of fault under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, and the available insurance, and no one can promise an amount. Motorcycle injuries are often severe, which can mean larger claims, but every case turns on its own facts and a consultation with an Illinois attorney is the way to evaluate yours.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Repaired five Illinois statute source links that used a retired URL scheme.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 735, Act 5 (Code of Civil Procedure)
§ 2-1116Limitation on recovery in tort actionsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
In all actions on account of bodily injury or death or physical damage to property, based on negligence, or product liability based on strict tort liability, the plaintiff shall be barred from recovering damages if the trier of fact finds that the contributory fault on the part of the plaintiff is more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury or damage for which recovery is sought. The plaintiff shall not be barred from recovering damages if the trier of fact finds that the contributory fault on the part of the plaintiff is not more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury or damage for which recovery is sought, but any damages allowed shall be diminished in the proportion to the amount of fault attributable to the plaintiff. No contributory fault may be attributed to a plaintiff bringing an action for damages for personal injury based on childhood sexual abuse as defined in Section 13-202.2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 65 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Best v. Taylor MacHine Works (Illinois Supreme Court 1997, 179 Ill. 2d 367)“…the allocation of fault and several liability provisions (735 ILCS 5/2-1116, 2-1117 (West 1996)), (3) the amendment…”
- Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. Lybrand (Illinois Supreme Court 2003, 208 Ill. 2d 259)“…iff." Ill.Rev. Stat.1987, ch. 110, par. 2-1116, codified at 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. [1] Since the 1986 version of the st…”
- Karas v. Strevell (Appellate Court of Illinois 2006, 308 Ill. Dec. 81)“…abrogated by Ill.Rev. Stat.1991, ch. 110, par. 2-1116 (now 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 (West 2004)) (adopting partial comparat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Illinois Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Utah Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, Tort Threshold, and Your Claim
§ 13-202Personal injury - PenaltyIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Actions for damages for an injury to the person, or for false imprisonment, or malicious prosecution, or for a statutory penalty, or for abduction, or for seduction, or for criminal conversation that may proceed pursuant to subsection (a) of Section 7.1 of the Criminal Conversation Abolition Act, except damages resulting from first degree murder or the commission of a Class X felony and the perpetrator thereof is convicted of such crime, shall be commenced within 2 years next after the cause of action accrued but such an action against a defendant arising from a crime committed by the defendant in whose name an escrow account was established under the "Criminal Victims' Escrow Account Act" shall be commenced within 2 years after the establishment of such account. If the compelling of a confession or information by imminent bodily harm or threat of imminent bodily harm results in whole or in part in a criminal prosecution of the plaintiff, the 2-year period set out in this Section shall be tolled during the time in which the plaintiff is incarcerated, or until criminal prosecution has been finally adjudicated in favor of the above referred plaintiff, whichever is later.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 460 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Landis v. Marc Realty, L.L.C. (Illinois Supreme Court 2009, 235 Ill. 2d 1)“…ns period in section 13-202 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/13-202 (West 2004)) applied to section 5-12-08…”
- Hernandez v. Pritikin (Illinois Supreme Court 2012, 981 N.E.2d 981)“…itations for a personal injury or product liability action (735 ILCS 5/13-202, 13-213 (West 1998) (two-year li…”
- Relf v. Shatayeva (Illinois Supreme Court 2013, 2013 IL 114925)“…ar statute of limitations for personal injury actions (735 ILCS 5/13-202 (West 2010)) was about to expire, plain…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Illinois Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability, Illinois Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 740, Act 180 (Wrongful Death Act)
§ 2(a) Every such action shall be brought by and in the names of the personal representatives of such deceased person, and, except as otherwise hereinafter provided, the amount recovered in every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin of such deceased personIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
In every such action the jury may give such damages as they shall deem a fair and just compensation with reference to the pecuniary injuries resulting from such death, including damages for grief, sorrow, and mental suffering, and punitive damages when applicable, to the surviving spouse and next of kin of such deceased person. Nothing in this Section affects the applicability of Section 2-1115 of the Code of Civil Procedure or Section 2-102 or 2-213 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act. Punitive damages are not available in an action for healing art malpractice or legal malpractice or in an action against the State or unit of local government or an employee of the State or an employee of a unit of local government in his or her official capacity. The changes made to this Section by this amendatory Act of the 103rd General Assembly apply to actions filed on and after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General Assembly.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 142 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carter v. SSC Odin Operating Company (Illinois Supreme Court 2012, 976 N.E.2d 344)“…surviving spouse and next of kin of such deceased person.” 740 ILCS 180/2 (West 2006). Thus, the personal…”
- Schrock v. Shoemaker (Illinois Supreme Court 1994, 159 Ill. 2d 533)“…be brought by the personal representative of the decedent. (740 ILCS 180/2 (West 1992).) As previously noted, sect…”
- In re Estate of Powell (Illinois Supreme Court 2014, 2014 IL 115997)“…complaint pursuant to the Wrongful Death Act (Act) (740 ILCS 180/2 (West 2012)) on behalf of Leona individ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Illinois (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Punitive Damages in Illinois: No General Cap, Rules (2026), Truck Accident Laws in Illinois (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 625, Act 5 (Illinois Vehicle Code)
§ 11-1404Special equipment for persons riding motorcycles, motor driven cycles or mopedsIn force
(a) The operator of a motorcycle, motor driven cycle or moped and every passenger thereon shall be protected by glasses, goggles or a transparent shield. (b) For the purposes of this Section, glasses, goggles, and transparent shields are defined as follows: "Glasses" means ordinary eye pieces such as spectacles or sunglasses worn before the eye, made of shatter-resistant material. Shatter-resistant material, as used in this Section, means material so manufactured, fabricated, or created that it substantially prevents shattering or flying when struck or broken. "Goggles" means a device worn before the eyes, the predominant function of which is protecting the eyes without obstructing peripheral vision. Goggles shall provide protection from the front and sides, and may or may not form a complete seal with the face. "Transparent shield" means a windshield attached to the front of a motorcycle that extends above the eyes when an operator is seated in the normal, upright riding position, made of shatter-resistant material, or a shatter-resistant protective face shield that covers the wearer's eyes and face at least to a point approximately to the tip of the nose.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
§ 11-709Driving on roadways laned for trafficIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Whenever any roadway has been divided into 2 or more clearly marked lanes for traffic the following rules in addition to all others consistent herewith shall apply. (a) A vehicle shall be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and shall not be moved from such lane until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety. (b) Upon a roadway which is divided into 3 lanes and provides for two-way movement of traffic, a vehicle shall not be driven in the center lane except when overtaking and passing another vehicle traveling in the same direction when such center lane is clear of traffic within a safe distance, or in preparation for making a left turn or where such center lane is at the time allocated exclusively to traffic moving in the same direction that the vehicle is proceeding and such allocation is designated by official traffic control devices.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 95 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Hackett (Illinois Supreme Court 2012, 971 N.E.2d 1058)“…ection 11-709(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Code) (625 ILCS 5/11-709(a) (West 2008) (improper lane usage)).…”
- People v. Mueller (Appellate Court of Illinois 2019, 2018 IL App (2d) 170863)“…nder section 11-709(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-709(a) (West 2016)), a person commit…”
- People v. Leyendecker (Appellate Court of Illinois 2003, 337 Ill. App. 3d 678)“…section 11-709(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (the Code) (625 ILCS 5/11-709(a) (West 2000)). The State asserts that…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is Lane Splitting Legal in Illinois? Lane Filtering Rules (2026)
Sources and References
- 735 ILCS 5/13-202, two-year limitation for personal injury(ilga.gov).gov
- 740 ILCS 180/2, Illinois Wrongful Death Act limitation period(ilga.gov).gov
- 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, modified comparative fault (recovery barred if more than 50 percent at fault)(ilga.gov).gov
- 625 ILCS 5/11-1404, motorcycle eye-protection requirement (no helmet requirement)(ilga.gov).gov
- 625 ILCS 5/11-709, driving on roadways laned for traffic (single lane; no lane splitting)(ilga.gov).gov
- Illinois Department of Insurance, auto insurance requirements(idoi.illinois.gov).gov
- U.S. NHTSA, motorcycle safety and helmet effectiveness(nhtsa.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.