Rhode Island
Rhode Island Dashcam Laws: Mounting, Audio, and Evidence Rules (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Dashcams are legal in Rhode Island, and no state law bans them, although the windshield-obstruction law limits where you can mount one. Audio recording follows one-party consent under R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21, meaning you do not need passenger permission to record a conversation you take part in. Mount the camera so it does not obstruct your view of the road.
Dashcams are legal in Rhode Island. No state law prohibits dashboard cameras, but R.I. Gen. Laws § 31-23-16 bars driving with any sign, poster, or other nontransparent material on the windshield that obstructs your clear view of the highway. Audio recording follows one-party consent under R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21. The statute's exception applies when the person recording is a party to the conversation or a party has given prior consent. Capturing passengers' conversations that you are not part of, without any participant's consent, falls outside that exception.

Mount cameras so they do not block your view through the windshield. Dashcam footage is valuable evidence for accidents, insurance claims, hit and runs, and traffic stops, provided it is authenticated and meets the rules of evidence.
The First Circuit protects recording police doing their jobs in public, and an officer generally may not order you to stop filming just because you are recording. Under Gericke v. Begin (2014), itself a traffic-stop case, an officer may order the recording stopped if the filming itself is interfering or about to interfere with the officer's duties, and may give reasonable safety orders during a stop that also limit filming. If ordered, comply and raise the issue later.
Commercial drivers should follow FMCSA regulations. Ride-share drivers can use dashcams; check platform policies. Section 11-35-21 addresses communications, not images, so it does not settle when cabin video of passengers is allowed; platform camera and notice rules still apply.
More Rhode Island Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Rhode Island Recording Laws
More Rhode Island Laws

- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Sexting Laws
- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Recording Laws
- Rhode Island AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Rhode Island Alimony Laws
- Rhode Island At-Will Employment Laws
- Rhode Island Car Accident Laws
- Rhode Island Car Seat Laws
- Rhode Island Child Custody Laws
- Rhode Island Child Support Laws
- Rhode Island Common Law Marriage Laws
- Rhode Island Data Privacy Laws
- Rhode Island Deepfake Laws
- Rhode Island Divorce Laws
- Rhode Island Dog Bite Laws
- Rhode Island Emancipation Laws
- Rhode Island Expungement Laws
- Rhode Island Hit and Run Laws
- Rhode Island Landlord-Tenant Laws
- Rhode Island Window Tint Laws
- Rhode Island Lemon Law
- Rhode Island Drone Laws
More Rhode Island Recording Topics
More Rhode Island Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Are dashcams legal in Rhode Island?
Yes. Dashcams are legal in Rhode Island. No state law bans them, but R.I. Gen. Laws § 31-23-16 prohibits driving with nontransparent material on the windshield that obstructs your clear view, so mount the camera where it does not block your view.
Where should I mount a dashcam in Rhode Island?
Mount the camera so it does not obstruct the driver's view of the road. R.I. Gen. Laws § 31-23-16 bars nontransparent material on the windshield that obstructs the driver's clear view.
Can my dashcam record audio in Rhode Island?
Yes. Audio recording follows Rhode Island's one-party consent rule under R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21, meaning you do not need passenger permission to record a conversation you take part in. Recording passengers' conversations you are not part of, without a participant's consent, is not covered by that exception.
Can a police officer make me turn off my dashcam during a traffic stop?
Generally not just because you are recording. In the First Circuit, recording police in public is protected, but under Gericke v. Begin (2014) an officer may order you to stop if the filming itself is interfering or about to interfere with the stop, and may give reasonable safety orders that also limit filming. If ordered, comply and raise the issue later.
Is dashcam footage admissible as evidence in Rhode Island?
Usually, yes. Dashcam footage is commonly used in Rhode Island accident, insurance, and hit and run cases, as long as it is authenticated and otherwise meets the rules of evidence.
Updates
We corrected the claim that officers can never order you to turn off a dashcam (under Gericke v. Begin, they may when the filming interferes, and may give safety orders), added Rhode Island's windshield-obstruction law behind the mounting advice, and clarified that footage must meet the rules of evidence to be admitted.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Clarified that Rhode Island's one-party consent exception covers conversations the driver takes part in, not passengers' private conversations the driver is not part of, and noted that the statute does not address cabin video.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Rhode Island General Laws, Title 11: Criminal Offenses, Chapter 11-35: Public Utilities
§ 11-35-21Unauthorized interception, disclosure or use of wire, electronic, or oral communicationIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in chapter 5.1 of title 12, any person: (1) who willfully intercepts, attempts to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept, any wire, electronic, or oral communication; (2) who willfully discloses or attempts to disclose to any person the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, knowing, or having reason to know that the information was obtained through interception of a wire, electronic, or oral communication in violation of this section; or (3) who willfully uses or attempts to use the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, knowing, or having reason to know, that the information was obtained through interception of a wire, electronic, or oral communication in violation of this section; shall be imprisoned for not more than five (5) years. (b) The provisions of subdivisions (a)(2) and (3) of this section shall not apply to the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, or evidence derived from those contents, which has become common knowledge or public information.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walden v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RI (2010) held municipalities are not persons who may be sued under sections 11-35-21 and 12-5.1-13. The earlier Walden v. City of Providence (2007) held this section is criminal but that R.I. Gen. Laws 9-1-2 supplies a civil right of action for its violation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…Stat. § 165.540 (1997); 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5703 (2000); R. I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 (2000); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 (…”
- Walden v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RI (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2010, 596 F.3d 38)“…te, 18 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.; Rhode Island's wiretap laws, R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 11-35-21, 12-5.1-13; and the state'…”
- Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1999, 191 F.3d 463)“…43 (1998); 18 Pa Cons Stat. Ann. §§ 5703, 5725 (West 1999); R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 (1998); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-13-601 to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Rhode Island Enacts AI Recording Consent Laws for Health Care, Rhode Island Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Rhode Island Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
Sources and References
- R.I. § 11-35-21(law.justia.com)
- FMCSA(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- RI DMV(dmv.ri.gov).gov
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21(webserver.rilegislature.gov).gov