Rhode Island
Rhode Island Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Rhode Island holds dog owners strictly liable for bites that occur outside the owner's enclosure under R.I. Gen. Laws 4-13-16; no proof of prior dangerous behavior is required. For bites inside an enclosed property, the common-law one-bite rule applies and the victim must show the owner knew the dog was dangerous.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Rhode Island Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Rhode Island's liability rule.
Overview of Rhode Island Dog Bite Laws
Rhode Island takes dog bite injuries seriously. The state's primary dog bite statute, R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16, creates a strict liability framework that holds dog owners and keepers financially responsible for injuries their animals cause. Unlike states that follow a pure one-bite rule, Rhode Island does not require victims to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous before the attack, as long as the bite happened outside the dog's enclosure.

This page covers the core liability standards, defenses available to dog owners, the vicious dog designation process, the statute of limitations, and criminal penalties that may apply in serious cases.
Strict Liability Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16
The Rhode Island Supreme Court has described the rule in a single phrase: under § 4-13-16, "strict liability attaches for any injury occurring outside the dog's enclosure." That line comes from Johnston v. Poulin, 844 A.2d 707 (R.I. 2004), a case about a horse that got loose, where the court compared the two animal statutes. It is a comparison drawn in passing rather than a holding construing the dog bite statute, but it captures how the section works. The statute reads, in relevant part:
If any dog kills, wounds, worries, or assists in killing, wounding or worrying, any sheep, lamb, cattle, horse, hog, swine, fowl, or other domestic animal belonging to or in the possession of any person, or assaults, bites, or otherwise injures any person while traveling the highway or out of the enclosure of the owner or keeper of that dog, the owner or keeper of the dog shall be liable to the person aggrieved, for all damage sustained.
Under this law, a dog bite victim only needs to prove three things:
- The defendant owned or kept the dog
- The dog bit or injured the victim
- The bite occurred outside the dog's enclosure (the owner's fenced yard, home, or other enclosed space)
The victim does not need to show that the owner was negligent or that the owner had any prior knowledge of the dog's aggressive tendencies.
The One-Bite Rule Inside the Enclosure
When a dog bite occurs inside the owner's enclosed property, the strict liability statute does not apply. Instead, the victim must rely on Rhode Island common law and prove that the owner knew or should have known about the dog's vicious propensities. This is the traditional "one-bite rule," which effectively gives the dog one chance before the owner can be held liable for bites on their own property.
There is an important exception. If the dog has already been declared vicious under § 4-13.1-11, the one-bite rule does not control. R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-7 creates a separate cause of action when a declared vicious dog, unprovoked, "attacks, assaults, bites, or otherwise injures any human being" and it reaches injuries inflicted "while out of or within the enclosure of the owner or keeper," whether or not the dog was leashed and securely muzzled and whether or not it escaped without fault of the owner. The section also states that it is not necessary "to prove that the owner or keeper of a dog that has been declared vicious knew that the dog that has been declared vicious possessed the propensity to cause this damage." For a declared vicious dog, in other words, a bite inside the enclosure carries no knowledge requirement at all.
To succeed under the one-bite rule, the victim typically needs evidence such as:
- Prior bite incidents involving the same dog
- A history of aggressive behavior (lunging, growling, snapping)
- Complaints from neighbors or delivery workers about the dog
- A prior vicious dog designation, which also opens the separate § 4-13.1-7 claim described above
If the bite happened inside the owner's yard or home, ask a Rhode Island dog bite lawyer for a free consultation on the prior-bite and complaint records that show what the owner knew (attorney advertising).
Who Can Be Held Liable
Rhode Island's dog bite laws extend liability beyond just the dog's legal owner.
Owners and Keepers
R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16 applies to both "owners" and "keepers" of dogs. A keeper is anyone who possesses or controls the dog, even temporarily. This means a dog-sitter, family member, or friend watching the dog can be held strictly liable if the dog bites someone outside the enclosure while in their care.
Harborers Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-17
R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-17 further extends liability to any person who keeps or harbors a dog in their house or on their property, or who knowingly allows someone else to do so. A harborer is someone who allows the dog to live on or regularly visit their property. Under this statute, the harborer faces the same liability as if they were the owner.
Landlord Liability
Landlords in Rhode Island may face liability for tenant dog bites under certain circumstances. Courts have found landlords potentially responsible when:
- The landlord knew the tenant's dog was dangerous
- The landlord had the contractual right to remove the dog (such as through a lease pet clause)
- The landlord failed to act on that knowledge
For example, if a lease requires the tenant to remove any dog that shows dangerous behavior, and the landlord learns the dog has bitten someone but does not enforce the lease, the landlord could share liability for a subsequent attack. A landlord who fails to repair a fence, knowing a dangerous dog could escape, may also be held responsible.
Double Damages for Repeat Offenses
One of the most significant provisions in Rhode Island's dog bite law is the double damages rule. Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16, if a dog that has already been the subject of a damages recovery injures someone again, the owner or keeper must pay double the damages to the new victim. The court must also order the dog to be destroyed.
This provision serves as both a financial penalty and a public safety measure. It gives dog owners a strong incentive to take immediate and effective steps to prevent a second attack after their dog has already caused harm.
Triple Damages After a Court Order to Confine
Double damages are not the ceiling. Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-19, a person assaulted by a dog, or who has reason to believe a dog is likely to cause injury, may make a sworn complaint to a district court judge. The judge summons the owner or keeper, and if the assault is proven or the complaint is found to rest on reasonable grounds, the court orders the defendant to pay costs and gives the owner or keeper written notice to immediately confine or kill the dog. Failing to comply carries a fine of $25 to $100, and any person may then lawfully kill the dog. Most important for a victim: if the dog wounds or injures any person after that notice, "the owner or keeper is liable to pay the person injured triple damages with costs." A second victim of a dog that a court has already ordered confined therefore has a stronger remedy than the double damages route.
Defenses Available to Dog Owners
Even under Rhode Island's strict liability framework, dog owners have several potential defenses.
Provocation
If the victim provoked the dog through teasing, hitting, tormenting, or other aggressive actions, the owner may have a valid defense. The provocation must be significant enough to cause a normally calm dog to react aggressively.
Trespassing
The strict liability statute applies when the victim is "traveling the highway or out of the enclosure." If the victim was trespassing on the owner's property and inside the dog's enclosure, the strict liability provision does not apply. The victim would need to prove the owner knew of the dog's vicious propensities under the common-law one-bite rule.
However, this defense may be limited when the trespasser is a child who cannot appreciate property boundaries.
Pure Comparative Negligence
Rhode Island follows a pure comparative negligence system under R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-20-4. This means the victim's damages will be reduced in proportion to their share of fault, but they can still recover even if they are found to be more at fault than the dog owner. For example, if a victim is found 30% at fault for approaching a chained dog despite warning signs, their damages award would be reduced by 30%.
Assumption of Risk
Professionals who work with dogs, such as veterinarians, groomers, and kennel workers, may be found to have assumed the risk of being bitten. This defense can limit or bar recovery when the victim voluntarily accepted a known risk.
Vicious Dog Designation in Rhode Island
Rhode Island regulates dangerous dogs through Chapter 4-13.1 (Regulation of Vicious Dogs) of the General Laws. This chapter establishes a formal process for identifying and restricting dogs that pose a public safety threat.
How a Dog Gets Declared Vicious
If a local animal control officer has probable cause to believe a dog is vicious, the officer convenes a hearing under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-11. The officer may seize and impound the dog before the hearing if the dog poses a threat of serious harm to people or domestic animals.
A dog may be declared vicious if it has:
- Attacked or bitten a person without provocation
- Killed or seriously injured a domestic animal without provocation
- Been trained or kept primarily for dog fighting
- Approached a person in a menacing or terrorizing manner on public property
Requirements for Owners of Vicious Dogs
Once a dog is declared vicious, the owner must comply with strict requirements spread across several sections of Chapter 4-13.1: R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-4 for confinement and leash/muzzle, with the enclosure specifications supplied by the definition in § 4-13.1-2(4), § 4-13.1-3 for liability insurance a hearing panel or judge may require, and § 4-13.1-9 for the warning sign and notification duty:
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Enclosure (defined in § 4-13.1-2(4); required by § 4-13.1-4) | Must be at least six feet tall with secure sides, top, and bottom; designed to prevent the dog from escaping and to keep out young children |
| Leash and muzzle (§ 4-13.1-4) | When outside the dwelling or enclosure (only for vet visits or compliance with dog officer), the dog must be muzzled and restrained on a leash with a minimum tensile strength of 300 pounds and no longer than three feet |
| Liability insurance (§ 4-13.1-3) | If the hearing panel or a district court judge imposes it, the owner must show proof of liability insurance of at least $100,000 and sign an annual attestation that the policy will not be voluntarily canceled. Section 4-13.1-3(a) makes these licensing conditions ones the panel "may" require, not automatic on every vicious declaration |
| Warning sign (§ 4-13.1-9) | A sign must be posted on the premises, visible and readable from the public highway, warning that a vicious dog is on the property |
| Notification (§ 4-13.1-9) | Owner must notify local police or animal control within two hours if the vicious dog escapes, attacks a person or animal, or dies |
A vicious dog that does not meet these requirements may be confiscated and humanely destroyed after a five-day waiting period.
Penalties for Vicious Dog Violations
Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-9, if a declared vicious dog attacks, bites, or injures a person without provocation, the owner or keeper faces a $1,000 fine. An unprovoked attack on an animal carries a $550 fine for a first offense, rising to $1,000 for each subsequent violation. If a vicious dog kills a person, the dog must be humanely euthanized.
Breed-Specific Legislation in Rhode Island
Rhode Island has a state preemption law that prohibits cities and towns from enacting breed-specific legislation (BSL). Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-16, municipalities cannot ban or restrict specific dog breeds. This means pit bulls, Rottweilers, and other commonly targeted breeds are legal to own throughout the state.
Before the 2013 state preemption law, some Rhode Island municipalities, including Pawtucket, had enacted pit bull bans. Those local bans were invalidated once the state law took effect. Rhode Island now focuses on individual dog behavior rather than breed when determining whether a dog is dangerous.
Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Claims
Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-14(b), the statute of limitations for personal injury claims in Rhode Island is three years from the date the injury occurred. Dog bite claims fall under this general personal injury deadline.
Important timing considerations:
- The clock starts on the date of the bite
- Minors may have tolled (extended) deadlines that begin running when they turn 18
- Claims against government entities, such as a bite by a police dog, may require earlier notice filing
- Filing after the three-year deadline will almost certainly result in the court dismissing the case
Dog Owner Responsibilities
Rhode Island imposes several responsibilities on dog owners beyond just bite liability.
Leash Laws
Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-15.1, municipalities have the authority to enact leash laws and regulations on unrestricted dogs. Most Rhode Island cities and towns require dogs to be leashed or otherwise restrained when off the owner's property. Violations can result in fines up to $250, and a dog officer may seize and impound any unrestricted dog found off the owner's property.
Licensing and Vaccination
Every city and town in Rhode Island requires dog licensing. The standard licensing fee is set at up to $10.00, with an additional $2.00 enforcement fee per license. Rabies vaccination is a prerequisite for licensing in most jurisdictions.
Confinement
Dog owners must keep their dogs securely confined on their own property when not on a leash. Failure to do so can lead to impoundment and fines, and it strengthens a victim's case if the dog escapes and bites someone.
Victim Rights and Compensation
Dog bite victims in Rhode Island may recover a broad range of damages in a civil lawsuit.
Economic Damages
- Medical expenses, including emergency treatment, surgery, and rehabilitation
- Future medical costs for ongoing treatment or reconstructive procedures
- Lost wages from missed work during recovery
- Loss of future earning capacity if injuries cause lasting disability
- Property damage
Non-Economic Damages
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress and psychological trauma (including PTSD and dog phobia)
- Scarring and permanent disfigurement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
Rhode Island does not impose a statutory cap on damages in dog bite cases, so victims may recover the full amount of their proven losses.
Steps to Take After a Dog Bite in Rhode Island
If you are bitten by a dog in Rhode Island, the following steps will help protect both your health and your legal rights:
- Seek medical attention immediately. Even minor bites can become infected. Have a medical professional clean and document the wound.
- Report the incident. File a report with local animal control and the police department. This creates an official record of the attack.
- Document your injuries. Take photographs of the bite wound, torn clothing, and the location where the attack happened.
- Identify the dog and owner. Get the owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's insurance information. Note the dog's breed, size, and color.
- Gather witness information. Collect names and contact details from anyone who saw the attack.
- Preserve evidence. Keep damaged clothing, medical records, and receipts for all related expenses.
- Watch for infection. Follow up with your doctor if you notice redness, swelling, or fever around the wound.
Criminal Penalties for Dog Owners
In addition to civil liability, Rhode Island dog owners may face criminal consequences in serious cases.
Vicious Dog Fines
Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-9, if a declared vicious dog injures a person, the owner faces a $1,000 fine; an unprovoked attack on an animal carries a $550 fine for a first offense, rising to $1,000 for a subsequent violation. The dog may be confiscated and destroyed.
Dog Fighting
Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-5, harboring dogs for dog fighting or training dogs to attack humans is a serious criminal offense carrying felony-level penalties.
Fatal Attacks
When a dog kills a person, the dog must be humanely euthanized. The owner may face additional criminal charges depending on the circumstances, such as whether they knew the dog was dangerous and failed to take precautions.
More Rhode Island Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Rhode Island follow the one-bite rule or strict liability for dog bites?
Rhode Island uses both systems depending on where the bite occurs. Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16, strict liability applies when a dog bites someone outside the owner's enclosure. If the bite happens inside the owner's enclosed property, the common-law one-bite rule applies, and the victim must prove the owner knew the dog had dangerous tendencies. The exception is a dog already declared vicious: R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-7 creates a separate claim for injuries caused out of or within the owner's enclosure, and expressly removes the need to prove the owner knew of the dog's propensity.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Rhode Island?
You have three years from the date of the dog bite to file a personal injury lawsuit under R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-14(b). If you miss this deadline, the court will almost certainly dismiss your case. Minors may have extended deadlines, and claims against government entities may require earlier notice.
Can someone other than the dog's owner be held liable for a dog bite in Rhode Island?
Yes. Rhode Island law holds keepers (anyone temporarily controlling the dog) and harborers (anyone who allows the dog to live on their property) to the same liability standard as the owner. Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-17, a person who keeps or harbors a dog in their house or on their land is liable for damages in the same manner as the owner.
What happens if the same dog bites someone a second time in Rhode Island?
Rhode Island law provides for double damages on a second recovery. If a dog has already been the subject of a damages judgment and injures someone again, the owner or keeper must pay double the damages. The court must also order the dog to be destroyed. A separate statute, R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-19, goes further: if a district court has already given the owner written notice to confine or kill the dog and the dog then injures someone, the owner or keeper owes the injured person triple damages with costs.
Does Rhode Island allow breed-specific bans on pit bulls or other breeds?
No. Rhode Island enacted a state preemption law under R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-16 that prohibits cities and towns from passing breed-specific legislation. All breeds are legal to own statewide. Rhode Island focuses on individual dog behavior rather than breed when determining whether a dog is dangerous.
Updates
Corrected the vicious dog requirements table (the six-foot enclosure specification comes from the definition in Sec. 4-13.1-2(4), and the $100,000 liability insurance applies only when a hearing panel or judge imposes it), added the Sec. 4-13.1-7 exception that lets a victim of a declared vicious dog sue without proving the owner knew of its propensity even for a bite inside the enclosure, added the Sec. 4-13-19 triple damages remedy, and sourced the Rhode Island Supreme Court quotation to Johnston v. Poulin, 844 A.2d 707 (R.I. 2004).
Corrected the breed-specific-legislation citation to the actual preemption statute (R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-16, not the unrelated leash-law section), split the vicious-dog penalty figures so the $1,000 fine applies to an attack on a person while a first-offense attack on an animal is $550, and fixed the vicious-dog-requirements table so each duty (enclosure, leash, insurance, sign, notification) cites its actual home section, adding the $100,000 minimum liability insurance figure.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Rhode Island General Laws, Title 4: Animals and Animal Husbandry, Chapter 4-13: Dogs
§ 4-13-16Action for damages to animals — Double damages on second recovery — Destruction of offending dogIn force
If any dog kills, wounds, worries, or assists in killing, wounding or worrying, any sheep, lamb, cattle, horse, hog, swine, fowl, or other domestic animal belonging to or in the possession of any person, or assaults, bites, or otherwise injures any person while traveling the highway or out of the enclosure of the owner or keeper of that dog, the owner or keeper of the dog shall be liable to the person aggrieved, for all damage sustained, to be recovered in a civil action, with costs of suit. If afterwards any such damage is done by that dog, the owner or keeper of the dog shall pay to the party aggrieved double the damage, to be recovered in the manner set forth and an order shall be made by the court before whom that second recovery is made, for killing the dog. The order shall be executed by the officer charged with the execution of the order, and it shall not be necessary, in order to sustain this action, to prove that the owner or keeper of the dog knew that the dog was accustomed to causing this damage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13-17Civil liability of person harboring dog for damagesIn force
Any person keeping or harboring in his or her house or on his or her lands any dog, or knowingly suffering this to be done by any other person, shall be liable for all damages done by the dog in the same manner as if he or she were the owner.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1989
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Brotko Ex Rel. Brotko v. United States (District Court, D. Rhode Island 1989, 727 F. Supp. 78)“…vernment is liable as a harborer or keeper of Chester under R.I.Gen.Laws § 4-13-17. The government argues that unde…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 4-13-15.1Ordinances concerning unrestricted and vicious dogs prohibited — Leash lawsIn force
(a) City or town councils may make any ordinances concerning dogs in their cities or towns as the councils deem expedient, pertaining to the conduct of dogs, which ordinances shall include regulations relating to unrestricted dogs, leash laws, confinement, and destruction of vicious dogs. Those ordinances may provide as follows: (1) Every owner or custodian of a dog shall cause that dog not to run unrestricted anywhere in the city or town. This section does not apply to any person who uses a dog under his or her direct supervision while lawfully hunting, while engaged in a supervised formal obedience training class or show or during formally sanctioned field trials. (2) It is unlawful for any owner of a dog to place that dog or allow it to be placed in the custody of any other person not physically capable of maintaining effective control of restricting the dog. (3) The city or town dog officer is empowered to seize and impound any dog found off the property of its owner or custodian when that dog is unrestricted. (4) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be fined not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars ($250).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13-19Order to confine or kill vicious dog — Subsequent damagesIn force
(a) If any person, or any member of his or her family shall be assaulted by any dog, out of the enclosure of its owner or keeper, or if any person shall have reason to believe that any dog will, out of that enclosure, do any injury to his or her person, family or property, and shall make complaint under oath, to any judge of the district court, that judge shall issue a summons to the owner or keeper of the dog, to appear before the division of the district court having jurisdiction of the case; and if, on examination, the court shall believe that the assault is proved, or that the complaint has reasonable grounds for the belief, it shall adjudge, and shall adjudge that the defendant pay costs of the proceedings and award execution of the proceedings, otherwise the costs shall be paid by the complainant; and the court shall issue written notice to the owner or keeper, and the owner or keeper shall forthwith confine or kill the dog; and if he or she neglects to kill the dog or keep the dog confined, he or she shall forfeit the sum of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100), to be recovered for the use of the city or town, and any person…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
Rhode Island General Laws, Title 4: Animals and Animal Husbandry, Chapter 4-13.1: Regulation of Vicious Dogs
§ 4-13.1-9Penalties for violation — Licensing ordinances and feesIn force
(a) Any dog declared vicious under § 4-13.1-11: (1) Whose owner or keeper does not secure the liability insurance coverage required in accordance with § 4-13.1-3; (2) Which is not maintained on property with an enclosure; (3) Which is outside of the dwelling of the owner or keeper, or outside of an enclosure except as provided in § 4-13.1-4; or (4) Which is not tattooed or microchipped, may be confiscated by a dog officer or may be destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner after the expiration of a five (5) day waiting period exclusive of Sundays and holidays which shall not include any day or part thereof that the public pound is not open for a specified period of time, not to be less than one half (½) the normal hours of business, for the purpose of reclaiming any such dog by its rightful owner. In addition, the owner or keeper shall pay a five hundred fifty dollar ($550) fine.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-3Requirements for registrationIn force
(a) No dog that has been declared vicious shall be licensed by any city or town for any licensing period commencing after April 1986, unless the owner or keeper of that dog that has been declared vicious meets any or all of the following requirements as may be imposed by the hearing panel: (1) A panel convened pursuant to § 4-13.1-11 of this chapter and/or a judge of the district court may require the owner or keeper to present to the city or town clerk or other licensing authority proof that the owner or keeper has procured liability insurance in the amount of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), covering any damage or injury which may be caused by the vicious dog during the twelve (12) month period for which licensing is sought, which policy contains a provision requiring the city or town to be named as additional insured for the sole purpose of the city or town clerk or other licensing authority where that dog is licensed to be notified by the insurance company of any cancellation, termination or expiration of the liability insurance policy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-16Prohibition of breed specific regulationIn force
No city or town may enact any rule, regulation or ordinance specific to any breed of dog or cat in the exercise of its power to further control and regulate dogs, cats or other animals as authorized by this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-11Determination of a vicious dogIn force
(a) In the event that the dog officer or law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a dog is vicious, the chief dog officer, or his or her immediate supervisor, or the chief of police, or his or her designee, is empowered to convene a hearing for the purpose of determining whether or not the dog in question should be declared vicious. The dog officer or chief of police shall conduct, or cause to be conducted, an investigation and shall notify the owner or keeper of the dog that a hearing will be held, at which time he or she may have the opportunity to present evidence why the dog should not be declared vicious. The hearing shall be held promptly within no less than five (5), nor more than ten (10), days after service of notice upon the owner or keeper of the dog. The hearing shall be informal and shall be open to the public. The hearing shall be conducted by a panel of three (3) persons that shall consist of the chief of police, or his or her designee, the executive director of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (S.P.C.A.), or his or her designee; and a person chosen by the chief of police and the executive director of the S.P.C.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-2DefinitionsIn force
As used in §§ 4-13.1-1 — 4-13.1-14, the following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates another or different meaning or intent: (1) “Dog officer” means any person defined by the provisions of chapter 19 of this title. (2) “Domestic animals” means animals that, through extremely long association with humans, have been bred to a degree that has resulted in genetic changes affecting the temperament, color, conformation, or other attributes of the species to an extent that makes them unique and distinguishable from wild individuals of their species.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-4Control of vicious dogsIn force
(a) All dogs that have been declared vicious shall be confined in an enclosure. It is unlawful for any owner or keeper to maintain a dog that has been declared vicious upon any premises which does not have a locked enclosure. (b) It is unlawful for any owner or keeper to allow any vicious dog to be outside of the dwelling of the owner or keeper or outside of the enclosure unless it is necessary for the owner or keeper to obtain veterinary care for the vicious dog or to comply with commands or directions of the dog officer with respect to the vicious dog, or to comply with the provisions of § 4-13.1-3(a)(1) or (a)(2). In this event, the vicious dog shall be securely muzzled and restrained with a leash or chain having a minimum tensile strength of three hundred (300) pounds and not exceeding three feet (3′) in length, and shall be under the direct control and supervision of the owner or keeper of the vicious dog.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-5Harboring dogs for dog fighting — Training dogs to attack humans — Selling, breeding, or buying dogsIn force
(a) No person shall own or harbor any dog for the purpose of dog fighting; or train, torment, badger, bait, or use any dog for the purpose of causing or encouraging the dog to unprovoked attacks upon human beings or domestic animals. (b) No person shall possess with intent to sell, or offer for sale, breed, or buy, or attempt to buy, within the state any dog that has previously been declared vicious by the vicious dog panel in accordance with § 4-13.1-11 (“Determination of a vicious dog”). (c) Any dog described in subsection (a) or (b) of this section lawfully seized by a sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, police officer, agent or officer of the Rhode Island Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RISPCA) may be placed in the care of the RISPCA pursuant to the provisions of § 4-1-22.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
§ 4-13.1-7Action for damages — Destruction of offending vicious dogIn force
If any dog declared vicious under § 4-13.1-11, when unprovoked, kills or wounds, or assists in killing or wounding, any domestic animal, belonging to or in the possession of any person, or, when unprovoked, attacks, assaults, bites, or otherwise injures any human being or assists in attacking, assaulting, biting or otherwise injuring any human being while out of or within the enclosure of the owner or keeper of the vicious dog, or while otherwise on or off the property of the owner or keeper whether or not the vicious dog was on a leash and securely muzzled or whether the vicious dog escaped without fault of the owner or keeper, the owner or keeper of the dog may be liable to the person aggrieved for all damage sustained, to be recovered in a civil action, with costs of suit. It is rebuttably presumed as a matter of law that the owning, keeping, or harboring of a dog that has been declared vicious in violation of this chapter is a nuisance.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
Rhode Island General Laws, Title 9: Courts and Civil Procedure
§ 9-1-14Limitation of actions for words spoken or personal injuriesIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Actions for words spoken shall be commenced and sued within one year next after the words spoken, and not after. (b) Actions for injuries to the person shall be commenced and sued within three (3) years next after the cause of action shall accrue, and not after, except as provided for otherwise in subsection (c) herein. Notwithstanding anything herein, any claim based on sexual abuse or exploitation of a child shall be governed by § 9-1-51. (c) As to an action for personal injuries wherein an injured party is entitled to proceed against an insurer pursuant to § 27-7-2, where an action is otherwise properly filed against an insured within the time limitations provided for by this section, and process against the insured tortfeasor has been returned “non estinventus” and filed with the court, then the statutory limitation for filing an action under § 27-7-2 directly against an insurer shall be extended an additional one hundred twenty (120) days after the expiration of the time limitation provided for in subsection (b) herein.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
Cited in 44 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kelly v. Marcantonio (Supreme Court of Rhode Island 1996, 678 A.2d 873)“…xual abuse of a minor governed by R.I.Gen. Laws § 9-1-51 or R.I.Gen.Laws § 9-1-14(b) when the claim is asserted against s…”
- Sanzi v. Shetty, 00-4523 (2002) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 2002)“…tatute of limitation applicable to personal injury actions, R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-14 , applies to an action for wrongful dea…”
- Rowey v. Children's Friend and Service, 98-0136 (2003) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 2003)“…atute of Limitations Plaintiffs and Defendant agree that R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-14 (b), the three-year statute of limitati…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Rhode Island Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Rhode Island Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), Rhode Island Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
§ 9-20-4Comparative negligenceIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
In all actions hereafter brought for personal injuries, or where personal injuries have resulted in death, or for injury to property, the fact that the person injured, or the owner of the property or person having control over the property, may not have been in the exercise of due care or the fact that the danger or defect was open and obvious shall not bar a recovery, but damages shall be diminished by the finder of fact in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person injured, or the owner of the property or the person having control over the property.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at webserver.rilegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sheehan v. THE NORTH AMERICAN MARKETING CORP. (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2010, 610 F.3d 144)“…ch a plaintiff may recover even if she is 99% at fault. See R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-20-4 (2009); Austin v. Lincoln Equip. Assoc.…”
- Carter v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2005, 413 F. Supp. 2d 495)“…comparative fault statute. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 85 ; R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-20-4; Conn. Gen.Stat. Ann. § 52-572h; N.Y.…”
- Edwards v. Eastman Outdoors, Inc. (District Court, D. Maine 2011, 799 F. Supp. 2d 102)“…Rev.Code Ann. § 2315.33; 42 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 7102(a); R.I. Gen. Laws Ann. § 9-20-4; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1—1—109(b), (d)-(e);…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Rhode Island (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Rhode Island Motorcycle Accident Laws (2026): Deadlines, Rhode Island Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Sources and References
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16 - Action for damages to animals; Double damages on second recovery; Destruction of offending dog(law.justia.com)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16 (Official Rhode Island Legislature)(webserver.rilegislature.gov).gov
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-17 - Civil liability of person harboring dog for damages(law.justia.com)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-4 - Control of vicious dogs(law.justia.com)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-9 - Penalties for violation; Licensing ordinances and fees(animallaw.info)
- Rhode Island Consolidated Dog Laws(animallaw.info)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-14 - Statute of limitations for personal injury(webserver.rilegislature.gov).gov
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-20-4 - Comparative negligence(law.justia.com)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-15.1 - Ordinances concerning unrestricted and vicious dogs; Leash laws(law.justia.com)
- NIMH - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)(nimh.nih.gov).gov
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-5 - Harboring dogs for dog fighting; Training dogs to attack humans(law.justia.com)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-16 - Prohibition of breed specific regulation(webserver.rilegislature.gov).gov
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-3 - Vicious dog licensing; insurance requirements(webserver.rilegislature.gov).gov
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-7 - Liability of owner or keeper of vicious dog for damages(webserver.rilegislature.gov)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13.1-2 - Definitions (including "enclosure")(webserver.rilegislature.gov)
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-19 - Complaint of dog assault; order to confine or kill; triple damages(webserver.rilegislature.gov)
- Johnston v. Poulin, 844 A.2d 707 (R.I. 2004)(www.courtlistener.com)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.