South Carolina
South Carolina Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights for Renters and Landlords (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Carolina tenants can record conversations with their landlord without notice under the one-party consent rule at S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30. That right covers phone calls, in-person meetings, and move-in or move-out inspections where you are a participant, and recordings made this way are admissible in court.
The landlord-tenant relationship in South Carolina involves a unique set of recording and surveillance issues. Tenants often need to document interactions with landlords about repairs, lease disputes, and potential illegal behavior. Landlords need to monitor their properties for security purposes. South Carolina's recording laws provide a framework for both, but crossing certain lines can result in criminal charges and civil liability.
This guide covers what tenants and landlords can record, where surveillance cameras are permitted, how recordings can be used as evidence, and what to do when privacy rights are violated.
Tenant Recording Rights
Recording Conversations with Your Landlord
Under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30, you can record any conversation you participate in without informing the other person. As a tenant, this means you can record:
- Phone calls with your landlord or property manager
- In-person conversations about lease terms, rent increases, or repairs
- Maintenance request discussions
- Move-in and move-out inspections
- Conversations about security deposit disputes
- Discussions about lease renewal or termination
- Any interaction where you are a participant
These recordings can serve as critical evidence in disputes about verbal agreements, harassment, or failure to maintain the property.
Why Tenants Record Landlords
Common situations where tenant recordings prove valuable:
Maintenance and repair disputes. When a landlord verbally agrees to fix a problem but does not follow through, a recording preserves the promise. Under the South Carolina Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-440), landlords must maintain the premises in a fit and habitable condition.
Illegal entry. South Carolina law at S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-530 requires landlords to give at least 24 hours' notice before entering a rental unit, with limited exceptions such as emergencies, announced visits for scheduled services the lease provides for, and repairs you requested. Recording an unauthorized entry documents the violation.
Harassment and retaliation. If a landlord retaliates against you for filing a complaint or exercising your legal rights, recording the interaction provides evidence. S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-910 prohibits landlord retaliation.
Security deposit disputes. Recording a walk-through inspection at move-out can prevent disputes about the condition of the property and justify the return of your security deposit.
Verbal lease modifications. If a landlord verbally agrees to changes in lease terms (reduced rent, permission for a pet, extended move-out date), a recording preserves the agreement.
Tenant Security Cameras
Tenants in South Carolina can generally install security cameras inside their own rental units. Common placements include:
- Inside the unit in common areas (living room, kitchen)
- Doorbell cameras at the unit's entrance
- Window cameras pointing outward at the tenant's parking space
Lease considerations: Before installing cameras, review your lease for provisions about:
- Modifications to the property (drilling holes, running wires)
- Exterior appearance restrictions (especially in apartments and condominiums)
- Rules about recording common areas shared with other tenants
- Sublease provisions that might affect camera placement in shared units
Audio recording caution: If your camera records audio, the one-party consent rule applies. Cameras that passively record conversations you are not part of may violate the wiretapping statute. Consider disabling audio recording on cameras that operate when you are not home.
Landlord Surveillance Rights

Security Cameras in Common Areas
Landlords of multi-unit properties can install security cameras in common areas where tenants do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy:

- Building lobbies and entrance areas
- Hallways and stairwells
- Parking lots and garages
- Laundry rooms
- Exterior building areas
- Mail room areas
- Pool and recreation areas (but not changing rooms or restrooms)
These cameras serve legitimate security purposes and help protect both the property and its tenants.
Where Landlords Cannot Place Cameras
South Carolina has no statute that bans landlord cameras by location. Several laws together put these places off limits in practice:
- Inside individual rental units: a landlord may not enter an occupied unit to install a camera without the tenant's consent except as S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-530 allows, and a tenant can seek an injunction, damages, and attorney's fees for a knowing unlawful entry under 27-40-780(b).
- Bathrooms, bedrooms, and changing rooms (including common-area restrooms and pool or gym changing rooms): recording a person there for sexual gratification is voyeurism under 16-17-470(B), and using a camera to spy on tenants can be peeping under 16-17-470(A).
- Any camera that records audio of tenants' private conversations without a participant's consent can be a felony under the wiretap law.
No statute speaks specifically to garages or storage units rented to individual tenants, but a camera inside one raises the same access and privacy problems, so landlords should not place one there without the tenant's agreement.
Installing hidden cameras inside a rental unit to spy on a tenant can violate S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470. Subsection (A), the peeping-tom provision, covers using video or audio equipment to spy on or invade the privacy of others and is a misdemeanor carrying up to 3 years in prison and a fine of up to $500. If the viewing or recording is done to arouse or gratify sexual desire, it is voyeurism under subsection (B): a first offense is a misdemeanor with the same penalty, and a second or subsequent voyeurism offense is a felony carrying up to 5 years in prison. A peeping, voyeurism, or aggravated voyeurism conviction, including a first-offense misdemeanor, also requires registration as a Tier I sex offender under S.C. Code Ann. 23-3-430(C)(1)(e). Registration is mandatory, and a Tier I offender may apply to end it only after 15 years (23-3-462). The landlord may also face civil liability for invasion of privacy.
Notice Requirements for Common Area Cameras
South Carolina does not have a specific statute requiring landlords to notify tenants about common area security cameras. However, best practices include:
- Including a disclosure in the lease agreement about surveillance in common areas
- Posting visible signage indicating areas under camera surveillance
- Informing tenants during the lease signing process
- Providing information about the purpose and scope of surveillance
Audio Recording by Landlords
Landlord audio surveillance is subject to the wiretapping statute. A landlord cannot install microphones or audio recording devices in common areas to capture tenant conversations without being a party to those conversations. Recording tenants' private conversations this way can be a felony under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-20 and 17-30-50. The law protects conversations held where the speakers reasonably expect not to be recorded, which a quiet exchange in a hallway may be even if a shout across a parking lot is not.
If a landlord uses a camera with audio capability in a common area, the audio function should be disabled unless the landlord is actively participating in conversations captured by the camera (such as through a two-way intercom system).
Recording During Landlord-Tenant Disputes

Documenting Property Conditions
Both tenants and landlords benefit from documenting property conditions through recording:
For tenants:
- Video record the condition of the unit at move-in and move-out
- Photograph and video damage caused by maintenance failures
- Record conversations where you notify the landlord of needed repairs
- Document the condition of the property before and after landlord inspections
For landlords:
- Video record property conditions during inspections
- Document damage caused by tenants
- Record conversations with tenants about lease violations (if you are a participant)
- Preserve evidence of property conditions for security deposit disputes
Recordings as Evidence in Court
Recordings made under one-party consent are admissible in South Carolina courts. In landlord-tenant disputes, recordings can be used in:
Magistrate's court. Most landlord-tenant disputes in South Carolina are heard in magistrate's court. Recordings of conversations about repairs, lease terms, and property conditions are commonly admitted.
Eviction proceedings. Landlords may use recordings to demonstrate lease violations, and tenants may use recordings to show retaliatory eviction or failure to maintain the premises.
Security deposit disputes. Video recordings of move-in and move-out conditions are particularly valuable in security deposit cases. Under S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-410, the landlord must return the deposit, with a written itemized list of any deductions, within 30 days after the tenancy ends and you deliver possession and request it, whichever is later. Give the landlord a forwarding address in writing; a landlord who wrongfully withholds the deposit can owe three times the amount withheld plus attorney's fees.
Fair housing complaints. Recordings can document discriminatory statements or practices that violate the South Carolina Fair Housing Law (S.C. Code Ann. 31-21-10 et seq.) or the federal Fair Housing Act.
Hidden Cameras in Rental Properties

Discovery of Hidden Cameras
If you discover a hidden camera in your rental unit, take these steps:
- Do not touch or remove the camera. Leave it in place for law enforcement to collect as evidence.
- Document the camera. Photograph its location from multiple angles, noting the exact position and any identifying markings.
- Call law enforcement. File a police report immediately. A hidden camera used to spy on you in a private area can be a misdemeanor under the peeping-tom provision of S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470; if it was done for sexual gratification, it is voyeurism, a misdemeanor on a first offense and a felony on a second or subsequent offense. Either conviction requires Tier I sex-offender registration.
- Contact an attorney. You may have claims for invasion of privacy, emotional distress, and violation of the voyeurism statute.
- Notify the landlord in writing. If the landlord is not the suspect, notify them. If the landlord installed the camera, do not give them advance notice before contacting law enforcement.
Short-Term Rentals (Airbnb, VRBO)
Hidden cameras in short-term rental properties are an increasing concern. South Carolina guests in short-term rentals have the same privacy protections as long-term tenants:
- Secretly filming guests in bedrooms, bathrooms, and other private areas can violate S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 (the peeping-tom provision, or the voyeurism provision when the purpose is sexual)
- Hosts must disclose any cameras on the property (most platforms require this in their terms of service)
- Exterior cameras and cameras in common areas that are disclosed are generally permitted
- If you discover an undisclosed camera, report it to law enforcement and the rental platform
- If intimate images were captured and distributed without consent, South Carolina's 2025 NCII law (S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332, signed May 12 2025) provides a criminal remedy, and since May 15, 2026 a separate civil law (S.C. Code Ann. 15-75-310 to -370) lets the person depicted sue for damages, including statutory damages of up to $10,000 per defendant
Criminal Penalties for Landlord Voyeurism
A landlord who installs hidden cameras in a tenant's private spaces can face:
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Peeping tom (video or audio equipment used to spy on or invade privacy) | Misdemeanor | Up to 3 years in prison, $500 fine |
| Voyeurism for sexual gratification (first offense) | Misdemeanor | Up to 3 years in prison, $500 fine |
| Voyeurism for sexual gratification (second or subsequent offense) | Felony | Up to 5 years in prison |
| Wiretapping (if audio is captured) | Felony | Up to 5 years in prison, $5,000 fine |
| Aggravated voyeurism (selling or distributing the recording) | Felony | Up to 10 years in prison |
Any peeping, voyeurism, or aggravated voyeurism conviction also requires registration as a Tier I sex offender (S.C. Code Ann. 23-3-430(C)(1)(e)).
In addition to criminal penalties, the tenant can pursue civil claims for:
- Invasion of privacy damages
- Emotional distress
- Punitive damages
- Attorney's fees
- Civil damages under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-135 ($500/day or $25,000 minimum) if audio was captured
Landlord Entry and Recording
Notice Requirements for Entry
Under S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-530(c), landlords must give the tenant at least 24 hours' notice of intent to enter and may enter only at reasonable times. This is an explicit statutory minimum, not an unwritten custom. The landlord may enter without that notice only:
- In an emergency, at any time (a likely weather danger to the property can count)
- For regularly scheduled services such as filter changes or pest treatment, between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., if the lease conspicuously provides for it and the landlord announces the entry
- For services you requested, between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., after announcing the entry
- Under a court order
- With a law enforcement officer at reasonable times to serve eviction papers
- As permitted by 27-40-720 and 27-40-730, or if you have abandoned or surrendered the unit
Recording Unauthorized Entry
If your landlord enters without proper notice, recording the entry can provide valuable evidence. Options include:
- Smart doorbell cameras that capture the landlord arriving
- Interior security cameras that record the entry
- Audio recordings if you are present and confronting the landlord about the unauthorized entry
Under S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-780(b), a tenant harmed by a landlord's knowing unlawful entry, repeated unreasonable lawful entry, or repeated entry demands that amount to harassment can get an injunction against the conduct or terminate the rental agreement, and can recover actual damages plus reasonable attorney's fees. South Carolina law does not provide a fixed one-month's-rent remedy for unauthorized entry.
Lease Provisions About Recording
Common Lease Clauses
Some South Carolina landlords include provisions in leases addressing recording and surveillance:
- No-recording clauses. Some leases prohibit tenants from recording conversations with landlord representatives. While such clauses may be enforceable as a matter of contract, they cannot override state law. A recording made in violation of a lease clause is still legal under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30, though violating the clause could potentially be treated as a lease violation.
- Camera installation restrictions. Leases may restrict the type or placement of tenant-installed cameras, particularly regarding modifications to the property.
- Surveillance disclosure clauses. Some leases disclose that common areas are under surveillance and require tenant acknowledgment.
Unconscionable Lease Terms
Under S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-230, courts can refuse to enforce lease terms that are unconscionable. A lease provision that attempts to waive a tenant's legal right to record their own conversations may be deemed unconscionable, particularly if the tenant needs recordings to protect their legal rights.
South Carolina Recording Law Sub-Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to South Carolina Recording Laws
More South Carolina Recording Topics
More South Carolina Laws
- South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws
- South Carolina Dashcam Laws
- South Carolina Data Privacy Laws
- South Carolina Deepfake Laws
- South Carolina Employee Monitoring Laws
- South Carolina GPS Tracking Laws
- South Carolina Police Bodycam Laws
- South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my landlord in South Carolina without telling them?
Yes. Under South Carolina one-party consent law (S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30), you can record any conversation you participate in without informing the other party. This includes phone calls, in-person meetings, move-in and move-out inspections, and maintenance discussions with your landlord or property manager.
Can my landlord install cameras inside my rental unit in South Carolina?
Not without your consent. South Carolina has no statute that bans landlord cameras by location, but a landlord may not enter your occupied unit to install a camera without your consent except as S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-530 allows. Cameras used to spy on tenants in private areas like bathrooms and bedrooms can violate S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470: the peeping-tom provision is a misdemeanor (up to 3 years in prison, $500 fine), and if the purpose is sexual gratification it is voyeurism, which rises to a felony (up to 5 years) for a second or subsequent offense. Either conviction also requires Tier I sex-offender registration. Landlords can install cameras in common areas of multi-unit properties like hallways and parking lots.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in my rental in South Carolina?
Do not touch the camera. Document its location with photographs, then call law enforcement immediately to file a report. Contact an attorney about potential civil claims. If the camera is in a private area like a bathroom or bedroom, the person who installed it can face misdemeanor peeping-tom charges under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, or voyeurism charges if the purpose was sexual gratification (a misdemeanor for a first offense, rising to a felony for a second or subsequent offense), and a conviction requires Tier I sex-offender registration.
Can I install a security camera at the entrance of my apartment in South Carolina?
Generally yes, but check your lease first. Some leases restrict modifications to the property, including installing cameras in common areas or at entrances. A doorbell camera that does not require drilling or permanent modification is typically the least problematic option. If your camera captures audio, consider disabling it when you are not home to comply with wiretapping laws.
Can recordings be used as evidence in landlord-tenant disputes in South Carolina?
Yes. Recordings made legally under one-party consent are admissible in South Carolina courts. They are commonly used in disputes about repairs, security deposits, lease violations, and eviction proceedings. Video recordings of property conditions at move-in and move-out are particularly valuable in security deposit cases.
Updates
Clarified that the tenant remedy in S.C. Code 27-40-780(b) applies when a landlord knowingly makes an unlawful entry.
Clarified that no South Carolina statute bans landlord cameras by location and explained the access, voyeurism, and wiretap rules that apply instead, added the mandatory Tier I sex-offender registration that follows any peeping or voyeurism conviction, listed every exception to the 24-hour entry-notice rule, corrected the security-deposit deadline, and noted the 2026 civil remedy for intimate-image disclosure.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Clarified that secret cameras in a rental can violate South Carolina's peeping-tom provision in S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470(A), and that the voyeurism provision and its second-offense felony apply only when the recording is done for sexual gratification.
Corrected the Landlord Entry section: S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-530(c) explicitly requires at least 24 hours' notice before entry (it is not silent on the point), and the remedy for a landlord's abuse of access is injunctive relief or lease termination plus actual damages and attorney's fees under S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-780(b), not the one-month's-rent figure the page previously stated.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the voyeurism penalty structure throughout this page: a first-offense hidden camera violation under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 is a misdemeanor (up to 3 years), not an automatic 5-year felony, and the '10 years for a minor victim' claim was removed since the statute's 10-year felony tier applies to selling or distributing a recording, with no age element.
Corrected the FAQ answer on hidden cameras inside a rental unit to state that a first voyeurism offense under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 is a misdemeanor, with the felony tier reserved for a second or subsequent offense, matching the correction already made in the body text and penalty table.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
§ 17-30-30Interception by employee of Federal Communications Commission, by person acting under color or law, and when party has given prior consentIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(A) It is lawful under this chapter for an officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, in the normal course of his employment and in discharge of the monitoring responsibilities exercised by the commission in the enforcement of 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5, to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication transmitted by radio or to disclose or use the information thereby obtained. (B) It is lawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception. (C) It is lawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McNeely (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)“…a showing. The South Carolina statute cited by Plaintiff—S.C. Code § 17-30-30—provides “it is lawful . . . for a per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, South Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Carolina Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 17-30-135Civil action for wrongful interceptionsIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(A) Any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this chapter has a civil cause of action against any person or entity who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person or entity to intercept, disclose, or use the communications and is entitled to recover from the person or entity which engaged in that violation relief as may be appropriate, including: (1) preliminary or equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; (2) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of five hundred dollars a day for each day of violation or twenty-five thousand dollars, whichever is greater, not to exceed the limits on liability provided in subsection (F)(3); (3) punitive damages, except as may be prohibited in subsection (F)(4); and (4) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carson v. Emergency MD LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2020)“…ation of this chapter has a civil cause of action . . . .” S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-135(A). Moreover, the SCHSA’s list of proh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), South Carolina Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for Calls (2026), South Carolina Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
§ 17-30-50Penalty for violating Sections 17-30-20 through 17-30-45In forcecited in 11 of our articles
(A) Except as provided in subsection (B), whoever violates the provisions of Sections 17-30-20 through 17-30-45, upon conviction, must be imprisoned not more than five years or fined not more than five thousand dollars, or both. (B) If the offense is a first offense under this chapter and is not for any unlawful purpose or for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private commercial gain, and the wire or electronic communication with respect to which the offense under this chapter was committed is a radio communication that is not scrambled, encrypted, or transmitted using modulation techniques the essential parameters of which have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the privacy of the communication, then: (1) if the communication is not the radio portion of a cellular telephone communication, a cordless telephone communication that is transmitted between the cordless telephone handset and the base unit, a public land mobile radio service communication, or a paging service communication, and the conduct is not that described in Section 17-30-35(7), the person committing the offense is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Also relied on in: Alabama Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), South Carolina Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-15-332Disseminating intimate images without consentIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(A) A person who intentionally disseminates an intimate image or a digitally forged intimate image of another person without the effective consent of the depicted person is guilty of the unauthorized disclosure of intimate images. A person intentionally disseminates an intimate image or a digitally forged intimate image if he has knowledge that the image was obtained or created under circumstances when he knew or reasonably should have known the person depicted had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Any dissemination of multiple intimate images of the same individual as part of a common act is a single offense. The fact that the identifiable individual: (1) provided affirmative consent for the creation of the intimate image shall not establish that the individual provided effective consent for the dissemination of the intimate image; and (2) disclosed the intimate image to another individual shall not establish that the identifiable individual provided effective consent for the dissemination of the intimate image by the person alleged to have violated this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Also relied on in: South Carolina Video Recording Laws: Where You Can and Cannot Record (2026), South Carolina Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Peeping, and Penalties (2026), South Carolina AI Laws: What's Enacted and What's Next (2027)
§ 16-17-470Eavesdropping, peeping, voyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(A) It is unlawful for a person to be an eavesdropper or a peeping tom on or about the premises of another or to go upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming an eavesdropper or a peeping tom. The term "peeping tom", as used in this section, is defined as a person who peeps through windows, doors, or other like places, on or about the premises of another, for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon and any other conduct of a similar nature, that tends to invade the privacy of others. The term "peeping tom" also includes any person who employs the use of video or audio equipment for the purposes set forth in this section. A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Anthony Helton (2019) read the section's voyeurism subsection to require knowingly viewing a person without consent, where privacy is expected, for sexual arousal or gratification, and held that conviction a sex offense requiring federal registration. State v. Harris (1987) held peeping tom a crime of moral turpitude.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Holmes (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 320 S.C. 259)✓At a capital murder trial the defense was barred from impeaching a jailhouse witness with his 1984 Peeping Tom conviction; the court held that was error because a section 16-17-470 violation is a crime of moral turpitude, but found the error harmless.
- State v. Harris (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1987, 293 S.C. 75)✓A man tried for assault with intent to commit sexual conduct with a minor was impeached with a prior Peeping Tom conviction; the court held the section 16-17-470 offense is a crime of moral turpitude, so using it to attack his credibility was proper.
- In re Parrott (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2017, 421 S.C. 105)“…ondent was arrested and charged with voyeurism pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 (B) (2015) after he used a cell phone t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026), South Carolina School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights (2026), South Carolina Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules (2026)
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 27: PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCES
§ 27-40-10Short titleIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
This chapter is known and may be cited as the South Carolina Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Byerly Ex Rel. Estate of Byerly v. Connor (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1992, 307 S.C. 441)“…common law has been abrogated as to residential property. S.C. Code Ann. §§ 27-40-10 to - 940 (1991). 2…”
- Pryor v. Northwest Apartments, Ltd. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1996, 321 S.C. 524)“…ing in tort under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-10 et seq. (Rev. 1991); See Watson v.…”
- Cramer Ex Rel. Estate of Zitricki v. Balcor Property Management, Inc. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1994, 312 S.C. 440)“…ed from the South Carolina Residential Landlord-Tenant Act, S.C. Code Ann. Section 27-40-10, et. seq. (1991), or from…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina's New Squatter Law Creates a Fast Ex Parte Removal Process (H.3387), South Carolina Landlord-Tenant Laws (2026): Deposits, Notice, and Tenant Rights
§ 27-40-230UnconscionabilityIn force
(a) If the court as a matter of law, finds: (1) a rental agreement was unconscionable when made, the court may refuse to enforce the rental agreement; (2) any provision of a rental agreement was unconscionable when made, the court may enforce the remainder of the agreement without the unconscionable provision or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid an unconscionable result; or (3) a settlement in which a party waives or agrees to forego a claim or right under this chapter or under a rental agreement was unconscionable when made, the court may refuse to enforce the settlement, enforce the remainder of the settlement without the unconscionable provision, or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid an unconscionable result. (b) If unconscionability is put into issue by a party or by the court upon its own motion, the parties must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to the setting, purpose, and effect of the rental agreement or settlement to aid the court in making the determination.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
§ 27-40-410Security deposits; prepaid rentIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Upon termination of the tenancy, property or money held by the landlord as security must be returned less amounts withheld by the landlord for accrued rent and damages which the landlord has suffered by reason of the tenant's noncompliance with Section 27-40-510. Any deduction from the security/rental deposit must be itemized by the landlord in a written notice to the tenant together with the amount due, if any, within thirty days after termination of the tenancy and delivery of possession and demand by the tenant, whichever is later. The tenant shall provide the landlord in writing with a forwarding address or new address to which the written notice and amount due from the landlord may be sent. If the tenant fails to provide the landlord with the forwarding or new address, the tenant is not entitled to damages under this subsection provided the landlord (1) had no notice of the tenant's whereabouts and (2) mailed the written notice and amount due, if any, to the tenant's last known address.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Schumacher v. Hoover (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2013)“…reached the challenged verdict."). As to monetary awards: S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-410(b) (2007) (stating that if the landlord…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 27-40-440Landlord to maintain premisesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A landlord shall: (1) comply with the requirements of applicable building and housing codes materially affecting health and safety; (2) make all repairs and do whatever is reasonably necessary to put and keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition; (3) keep all common areas of the premises in a reasonably safe condition, and, for premises containing more than four dwelling units, keep in a reasonably clean condition; (4) make available running water and reasonable amounts of hot water at all times and reasonable heat except where the building that includes the dwelling unit is not required by law to be equipped for that purpose, or the dwelling unit is so constructed that heat or hot water is generated by an installation within the exclusive control of the tenant and supplied by a direct public utility connection; (5) maintain in reasonably good and safe working order and condition all electrical, gas, plumbing, sanitary, heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and other facilities and appliances, including elevators, supplied or required to be supplied by him.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pryor v. Northwest Apartments, Ltd. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1996, 321 S.C. 524)“…mmon areas of the premises in a reasonably safe condition. S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-440 (a)(3) (Rev. 1991). The majority conc…”
- Durkin v. Hansen (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1993, 313 S.C. 343)“…keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition. . . .” S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-440 (1991). The RLTA was enacted subsequen…”
- Audra Starnes v. Craig Stoneburner (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2025)“…of evading the obligations of the landlord. S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-440(c). The Property is a single-family re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 27-40-530AccessIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A tenant shall not unreasonably withhold consent to the landlord to enter into the dwelling unit in order to inspect the premises, make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations, or improvements, supply necessary or agreed services, or exhibit the dwelling unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workmen, or contractors. (b) A landlord or his agent may enter the dwelling unit without consent of the tenant: (1) At any time in case of emergency—prospective changes in weather conditions which pose a likelihood of danger to the property may be considered an emergency; (2) Between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. for the purpose of providing regularly scheduled periodic services such as changing furnace and air-conditioning filters, providing termite, insect, or pest treatment, and the like, provided that the right to enter to provide regularly scheduled periodic services is conspicuously set forth in writing in the rental agreement and that prior to entering, the landlord announces his intent to enter to perform services; or (3) Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hamilton v. Scott (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2017)“…a right to enter the premises without a writ of ejectment: S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-530(d)(4) (2007) (permitting a landlord to…”
- Schumacher v. Hoover (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2013)“…he breach of the lease agreement or it will be terminated). S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-530(a) (2007) (stating a tenant shall not w…”
- Salek v. Nirenblatt (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2011)“…y not enter a dwelling unit without the tenant's consent. S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-530 (2007). Generally, "the tenant may…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 27-40-780Landlord and tenant remedies for abuse of accessIn force
(a) If the tenant refuses to allow lawful access, the landlord may obtain injunctive relief in magistrates' or circuit court without posting bond to compel access, or terminate the rental agreement. In either case the landlord may recover actual damages and reasonable attorney's fees. (b) If the landlord knowingly makes an unlawful entry or repeated lawful entry in an unreasonable manner or makes repeated demands for entry otherwise lawful but which have the effect of unreasonably harassing the tenant, the tenant may obtain injunctive relief in magistrates' or circuit court without posting bond to prevent the recurrence of the conduct or terminate the rental agreement. In either case the tenant may recover actual damages and reasonable attorney's fees.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
§ 27-40-910Retaliatory conduct prohibitedIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in this section, a landlord shall not retaliate by increasing rent to an amount in excess of fair-market value or decreasing essential services or by bringing an action for possession after: (1) the tenant has complained to a governmental agency charged with responsibility for enforcement of a building or housing code of a violation applicable to the premises materially affecting health and safety; or (2) the tenant has complained to the landlord of a violation of this chapter. (b) If the landlord acts in violation of subsection (a), the tenant is entitled to the remedies provided in SECTION 27-40-660 as a defense in any retaliatory action against him for possession. If the defense by the tenant is without merit, the landlord is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. If the defense is raised in bad faith, the landlord may recover up to three month's periodic rent or treble the actual damages, whichever is greater. If the landlord recovers damages under this section, he may not also recover damages under SECTION 27-40-760.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Also relied on in: South Carolina Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 31: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
§ 31-21-10Short titleIn force
This chapter is known and may be cited as the South Carolina Fair Housing Law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- SCHuman Affairs Commission v. Yang (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2020)“…re clients came for treatment in a quiet atmosphere. 1 S.C. Code Ann. §§ 31-21-10 to -150 (2007 & Supp. 2019). 2 See S.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 1801Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 81 of our articles
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. In this section— the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast; the term “broadcast” means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons; the term “a private area of the individual” means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; the term “female breast” means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; and the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means— circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or circumstances in which a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied 18 U.S.C. 1801 mainly at its edges. United States v. Johnson (2010) read it as Congress's answer to secretly filming nudity on federal property, acquitting on a child exploitation charge instead. EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security (2011) applied the Section 1801(c) law enforcement exception to a TSA scanner claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Helton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 944 F.3d 198)“…from this list of federal offenses is video voyeurism under 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Rather than list this statute as an enu…”
- United States v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2010, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1059)✓A weightlifting coach hid a camera to film minors weighing in nude; acquitting him under the child exploitation statute, the court called that conduct plain video voyeurism under section 1801, but noted the section reaches only federal maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 653 F.3d 1)✓Privacy groups challenged TSA body scanners under the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act; the D.C. Circuit held the statute's exception for lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity applied to airport screening, so the section 1801 claim failed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), California Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES § 17-30-10 (Interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications authorized) · South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES § 16-17-10 (Barratry prohibited)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- South Carolina Residential Landlord and Tenant Act(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17, Chapter 30 -- Wiretapping(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16, Chapter 17 -- Voyeurism(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Fair Housing Law(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Human Affairs Commission(schac.sc.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 1801 -- Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
- S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332 -- Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images (Act 37 of 2025)(scstatehouse.gov).gov