South Carolina
South Carolina Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30, South Carolina employees may legally record any workplace conversation they participate in without notifying the other party. Employer no-recording policies are enforceable in this at-will state, but a recording made in violation of policy remains valid evidence in court.
South Carolina's one-party consent law gives both employees and employers significant flexibility when it comes to workplace recording. However, the intersection of state wiretapping laws, federal labor protections, privacy statutes, and employer policies creates a nuanced landscape that requires careful navigation.
This guide covers what employees can record, what employers can monitor, the limits on workplace surveillance, and how workplace recordings are used in legal proceedings.
Employee Recording Rights in South Carolina
The One-Party Consent Advantage
Under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30, any party to a conversation can record it without informing the other participants. In the workplace, this means employees can legally record:

- Conversations with supervisors and managers
- Meetings with HR representatives
- Discussions with coworkers
- Performance reviews and disciplinary meetings
- Phone calls with clients or vendors (when the employee is a party)
- Interviews and hiring discussions
The key requirement is active participation. You must be part of the conversation you are recording. Placing a recording device in a conference room and leaving, or hiding a recorder near your coworker's desk to capture their conversations, is illegal interception under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-20.
Common Reasons Employees Record at Work
Employees in South Carolina frequently record workplace interactions to:
- Document harassment or discrimination. Audio recordings can provide powerful evidence of hostile work environment, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, or other forms of workplace misconduct.
- Preserve performance review details. Recording a performance review creates an accurate record of what was said, including any commitments made by management.
- Protect against retaliation. If you have filed a complaint or reported misconduct, recording interactions can document retaliatory behavior.
- Clarify instructions. Recording complex instructions or project briefings ensures accuracy and reduces misunderstandings.
- Document unsafe working conditions. Recording evidence of safety violations can support safety complaints and workers' compensation claims. A private-sector employee who is punished for a safety complaint has only 30 days to file a retaliation complaint with the state Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (S.C. Code Ann. 41-15-520).
- Preserve evidence for wage disputes. Recording conversations about pay, overtime, or benefits can help resolve disputes about compensation.
Devices for Workplace Recording
South Carolina law does not restrict what type of device you can use. Common options include:
- Smartphone voice recording apps
- Dedicated digital voice recorders
- Smartwatches with microphone capability
- AI voice recorders (Plaud NotePin, Otter.ai devices)
- Laptop recording software during video meetings
Before using any recording device, review your employer's policies. While the recording is legal under state law, the device itself may violate company rules about personal electronics in certain work environments.
Employer Surveillance Rights

Video Monitoring in the Workplace
South Carolina employers have broad authority to install video surveillance in workplace areas where employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Legal locations for employer video cameras include:
- Common work areas such as open-plan offices, cubicle areas, and workstations
- Hallways, lobbies, and reception areas
- Break rooms and cafeterias (these are considered semi-public areas)
- Warehouses, manufacturing floors, and production areas
- Parking lots and exterior building areas
- Cash register areas and retail sales floors
- Loading docks and shipping areas
Where Employers Cannot Place Cameras
Employers should keep cameras out of areas where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy, because recording there can lead to criminal charges under South Carolina's voyeurism statute, S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, or the wiretap law, and to civil privacy claims:
- Bathrooms and restrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Shower facilities
- Nursing rooms designated for breastfeeding
- Private offices with closed doors (for audio recording without consent)
An employer who installs a hidden camera in one of these areas for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire commits voyeurism under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470(B), a misdemeanor punishable by up to three years in prison and a $500 fine for a first offense, escalating to a felony carrying up to 5 years in prison and up to $5,000 in fines for a second or subsequent offense. South Carolina has no statute that lists where an employer may mount cameras. The peeping and eavesdropping offense in subsection (A) reaches conduct "on or about the premises of another" and does not apply to "security surveillance ... in bona fide business establishments" (16-17-470(E)(2)), so whether a non-sexual camera in these areas is a crime is unsettled. It still invites invasion-of-privacy lawsuits, and a camera that picks up conversations no employer representative is part of can violate the wiretap law. Affected employees may also pursue civil claims for invasion of privacy.
Audio Monitoring by Employers
Employer audio monitoring is subject to the wiretapping statute. Under the one-party consent rule, an employer can record a conversation only if a representative of the employer is a party to that conversation. An employer cannot:
- Install hidden microphones to record employee conversations the employer is not part of
- Use audio surveillance systems that capture conversations without any party's consent
- Tap employee phone lines to record calls without participation or consent
Violating these rules is a felony under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-50, carrying up to 5 years in prison and $5,000 in fines. A person whose conversation is illegally intercepted can also sue under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-135 for actual damages, but not less than $500 a day for each day of violation or $25,000, whichever is greater, plus possible punitive damages and attorney's fees. The suit must be filed within five years of when the person first had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation, and a suit against a government employer goes through the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, which caps damages.
Computer and Email Monitoring
South Carolina does not have a specific statute governing employer monitoring of company-owned computers and email systems. Under the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), employers generally may monitor electronic communications made on company-owned equipment, particularly when employees have been notified of the monitoring through written policies.
Best practices for employers include:
- Maintaining a written electronic monitoring policy
- Requiring employees to acknowledge the policy in writing
- Clearly stating that company devices and networks are subject to monitoring
- Distinguishing between company-owned and employee-owned devices
Employer No-Recording Policies

Are They Enforceable?
South Carolina is an at-will employment state, meaning employers can generally terminate employees for any reason that is not illegal. An employer can implement and enforce a policy prohibiting workplace recording. If you violate a no-recording policy, your employer can discipline or fire you, even though the recording itself was legal under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30.
The recording remains legally valid and could be used as evidence in court or administrative proceedings. However, the act of making the recording, while legal, may cost you your job if it violates company policy.
NLRA Protections: When No-Recording Policies Go Too Far
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees' right to engage in "concerted activity" for mutual aid and protection. This includes the right to document workplace conditions, discuss wages with coworkers, and organize for better working conditions.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has examined employer no-recording policies in several significant cases:
Whole Foods Market, Inc. (2015). The NLRB ruled that a blanket no-recording policy violated Section 7 of the NLRA because it could reasonably be interpreted to restrict employees' protected concerted activity. The Board held that employees have a right to record in certain circumstances, such as documenting unsafe conditions or preserving evidence of unfair labor practices.
Stericycle, Inc. (2023). The NLRB replaced the Boeing framework with a new standard in Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023). Under Stericycle, the Board scrutinizes any facially neutral workplace rule that could reasonably be interpreted to restrict Section 7 activity. The burden shifts to the employer to show the rule advances a legitimate and substantial business interest that cannot be achieved with a more narrowly tailored rule. Blanket no-recording policies that make no exception for concerted activity face heightened risk under this standard. Stericycle remains the Board's standard for judging workplace rules, though the current Board has signaled it may revisit it.
Practical impact: While employers can maintain no-recording policies, those policies cannot be used to punish employees who record as part of protected concerted activity. Recording evidence of labor law violations, safety hazards, or unfair labor practices may be protected even if it violates an employer's policy.
Crafting a Lawful No-Recording Policy
Employers who want to restrict workplace recording should:
- Be specific. Rather than a blanket ban, identify the specific concerns the policy addresses (protecting trade secrets, patient privacy, client confidentiality).
- Include exceptions. Acknowledge that recording may be permitted in certain circumstances, such as documenting workplace safety concerns.
- Comply with NLRA requirements. Ensure the policy does not broadly restrict employees' rights to engage in concerted activity.
- Provide notice. Distribute the policy to all employees and obtain written acknowledgment.
- Apply consistently. Enforce the policy uniformly across all employees and situations.
Whistleblower Protections

South Carolina Whistleblower Laws
South Carolina provides certain protections for employees who report illegal activity. While the state's whistleblower protections are narrower than some other states, they are relevant to workplace recording:
- South Carolina Payment of Wages Act (S.C. Code Ann. 41-10-10 et seq.) lets an employee sue an employer for unpaid or withheld wages, recovering up to three times the amount owed plus costs and attorney's fees. It does not itself protect an employee from retaliation for reporting a wage violation.
- Public employee whistleblower protections (S.C. Code Ann. 8-27-10 et seq.) protect state and local government workers who report waste, fraud, or abuse from employer retaliation. This chapter does not extend to private-sector employees (S.C. Code Ann. 8-27-50).
- Occupational safety retaliation protection (S.C. Code Ann. 41-15-510) bars any employer, private or public, from firing or discriminating against an employee for filing a safety and health complaint, starting a proceeding, or testifying. A private-sector employee must file a complaint with the Director of the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation within 30 days after the retaliation (S.C. Code Ann. 41-15-520).
- Federal whistleblower statutes (OSHA, Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank) provide additional protections that may apply to South Carolina workers
Recordings made under one-party consent can serve as evidence in a retaliation claim. Public employees may have protection under South Carolina's public employee whistleblower statute; private-sector employees are not covered by that chapter, but those punished for raising workplace safety complaints are protected by S.C. Code Ann. 41-15-510 (with a 30-day deadline to file with LLR), and other reports generally rely on federal whistleblower statutes.
Documenting Workplace Misconduct
If you are recording workplace misconduct for potential legal action, follow these best practices:
- Be a participant in every conversation you record. Never record conversations you are not part of.
- Store recordings securely. Keep copies in a personal, secure location outside the workplace. Do not store recordings solely on company devices.
- Maintain metadata. Preserve the original files with timestamps and other metadata intact.
- Do not share recordings unnecessarily. Share them only with your attorney, relevant government agencies, or in legal proceedings.
- Consult an attorney. Before using recordings in a legal proceeding, consult with a lawyer who can advise on admissibility and strategy.
Workplace Recording in Specific Industries
Healthcare Facilities
Healthcare workplaces have additional privacy considerations due to HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). While HIPAA does not directly prohibit recording in healthcare workplaces, recordings that capture protected health information (PHI) may create compliance issues. Healthcare employers typically have strict no-recording policies tied to patient privacy obligations.
Financial Services
Banks, investment firms, and other financial institutions often record phone calls for regulatory compliance. South Carolina's one-party consent rule permits these recordings, and federal regulations under the Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA may actually require certain call recordings.
Education
School employees have unique considerations. Recording students may implicate FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) if the recording captures education records or private student information. Teachers and administrators should check their school district's recording policies.
Government Employment
South Carolina government employees are subject to the state's public records laws. Recordings made by government employees in the course of their duties may be subject to Freedom of Information Act requests under S.C. Code Ann. 30-4-10 et seq..
Using Workplace Recordings as Evidence
Employment Discrimination Claims
Recordings are frequently used as evidence in employment discrimination cases filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or the South Carolina Human Affairs Commission. Courts generally admit recordings made under one-party consent as evidence of:
- Discriminatory statements by supervisors
- Hostile work environment conditions
- Retaliatory conduct following a complaint
- Failure to accommodate disabilities
Workers' Compensation Claims
Audio and video recordings can support workers' compensation claims in South Carolina by documenting:
- Unsafe working conditions that led to an injury
- Conversations about injury reporting and medical treatment
- Employer responses to injury reports
- Return-to-work discussions and accommodation requests
Wage and Hour Disputes
Recordings of conversations about pay rates, overtime expectations, and work schedule requirements can be valuable evidence in wage disputes under both the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.
Criminal Penalties for Illegal Workplace Recording
For Employers
An employer who illegally records employee conversations faces:
- Felony charges under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-50 (up to 5 years in prison, $5,000 fine)
- Civil liability under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-135 (actual damages, but not less than $500 a day for each day of violation or $25,000, whichever is greater; five-year filing deadline from discovery)
- Voyeurism charges under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470(B) if cameras are placed in private areas for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire (misdemeanor for a first offense, up to 3 years and a $500 fine; felony for a second or subsequent offense, up to 5 years and up to $5,000 in fines). Whether non-sexual hidden cameras in these areas are a crime is unsettled, because subsection (A) reaches only conduct on another person's premises and exempts security surveillance in bona fide businesses
- Federal liability under 18 U.S.C. 2511 for wiretap violations
For Employees
An employee who records conversations they are not part of faces the same criminal penalties. Planting a recording device at a coworker's desk, in a conference room you are not using, or in any other location to capture conversations without being present is a felony.
South Carolina Recording Law Sub-Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to South Carolina Recording Laws
More South Carolina Recording Topics
More South Carolina Laws
- South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws
- South Carolina Dashcam Laws
- South Carolina Data Privacy Laws
- South Carolina Deepfake Laws
- South Carolina Employee Monitoring Laws
- South Carolina GPS Tracking Laws
- South Carolina Police Bodycam Laws
- South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my boss in South Carolina without telling them?
Yes. Under South Carolina one-party consent law (S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30), you can record any conversation you participate in without informing your boss. This includes meetings, performance reviews, disciplinary discussions, and phone calls. However, if your employer has a no-recording policy, violating it could result in disciplinary action or termination, even though the recording itself is legal.
Can my employer record me at work in South Carolina?
Employers can install video cameras in common work areas where employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as hallways, break rooms, and open offices. Cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas are off-limits in practice: secretly filming employees there for a sexual purpose is voyeurism under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, and a camera there for any reason invites privacy lawsuits. For audio recording, the employer must be a party to the conversation or have consent from at least one participant.
Can I be fired for recording at work in South Carolina?
Yes. South Carolina is an at-will employment state, and an employer can terminate you for violating a company no-recording policy. The recording remains legal under state law and can still be used as evidence, but the act of recording against company policy can be grounds for termination. An exception may apply if you were recording as part of protected concerted activity under the NLRA.
Can I record a conversation between coworkers that I am not part of?
No. One-party consent requires that you be an active participant in the conversation. Recording coworkers' conversations without being a party is illegal interception under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-20. This is a felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison and $5,000 in fines.
Can my employer monitor my work emails and computer in South Carolina?
Generally yes, if you are using company-owned equipment and the employer has a written policy notifying you of the monitoring. South Carolina does not have a specific statute on computer monitoring, but the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act permits employer monitoring of company systems when employees have been given notice. Personal devices are subject to different rules.
Updates
We corrected statements that South Carolina's voyeurism law bans employer cameras in listed places (it criminalizes secret, sexual-purpose recording, and its peeping offense exempts business security surveillance), added the state's own protection for private employees who make safety complaints and its 30-day filing deadline, restated the wiretap damages rule and five-year deadline, and noted the NLRB may revisit Stericycle.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the Whistleblower Protections section: the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act does not itself protect employees from retaliation, and the state's public-employee whistleblower statute (8-27-10 et seq.) covers government workers only. Also corrected the hidden-camera/voyeurism sections: South Carolina's felony voyeurism penalty applies only when a hidden camera is used for a sexual purpose, not to non-sexual workplace surveillance in private areas.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the penalty for workplace voyeurism under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470: a first offense is a misdemeanor (up to 3 years, $500 fine), not automatically a felony; the 5-year felony tier applies only to a second or subsequent offense.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
§ 17-30-30Interception by employee of Federal Communications Commission, by person acting under color or law, and when party has given prior consentIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(A) It is lawful under this chapter for an officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, in the normal course of his employment and in discharge of the monitoring responsibilities exercised by the commission in the enforcement of 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5, to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication transmitted by radio or to disclose or use the information thereby obtained. (B) It is lawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception. (C) It is lawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McNeely (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)“…a showing. The South Carolina statute cited by Plaintiff—S.C. Code § 17-30-30—provides “it is lawful . . . for a per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, South Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Carolina Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 17-30-135Civil action for wrongful interceptionsIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(A) Any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this chapter has a civil cause of action against any person or entity who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person or entity to intercept, disclose, or use the communications and is entitled to recover from the person or entity which engaged in that violation relief as may be appropriate, including: (1) preliminary or equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; (2) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of five hundred dollars a day for each day of violation or twenty-five thousand dollars, whichever is greater, not to exceed the limits on liability provided in subsection (F)(3); (3) punitive damages, except as may be prohibited in subsection (F)(4); and (4) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carson v. Emergency MD LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2020)“…ation of this chapter has a civil cause of action . . . .” S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-135(A). Moreover, the SCHSA’s list of proh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), South Carolina Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for Calls (2026), South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
§ 17-30-20Prohibited actsIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, a person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be punished as provided in Section 17-30-50 of this chapter: (1) intentionally intercepts, attempts to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication; (2) intentionally uses, attempts to use, or procures any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (a) the device is affixed to or otherwise transmits a signal through a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or (b) the device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of the communication; (3) intentionally discloses or attempts to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; (4) intentionally uses or attempts to use the contents of any wire, oral, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ducharme v. Madewell Concrete LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)“…the intentional interception of electronic communications. S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-20; 18 U.S.C. § 2511. The critical inquir…”
- Carson v. Emergency MD LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2020)“…SCHSA’s list of prohibited acts require interception. See S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-20. The SCHSA defines “intercept” as “the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Video Recording Laws: Where You Can and Cannot Record (2026), South Carolina Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Peeping, and Penalties (2026), South Carolina Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
§ 17-30-50Penalty for violating Sections 17-30-20 through 17-30-45In forcecited in 11 of our articles
(A) Except as provided in subsection (B), whoever violates the provisions of Sections 17-30-20 through 17-30-45, upon conviction, must be imprisoned not more than five years or fined not more than five thousand dollars, or both. (B) If the offense is a first offense under this chapter and is not for any unlawful purpose or for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private commercial gain, and the wire or electronic communication with respect to which the offense under this chapter was committed is a radio communication that is not scrambled, encrypted, or transmitted using modulation techniques the essential parameters of which have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the privacy of the communication, then: (1) if the communication is not the radio portion of a cellular telephone communication, a cordless telephone communication that is transmitted between the cordless telephone handset and the base unit, a public land mobile radio service communication, or a paging service communication, and the conduct is not that described in Section 17-30-35(7), the person committing the offense is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Also relied on in: Alabama Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Carolina Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-17-470Eavesdropping, peeping, voyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(A) It is unlawful for a person to be an eavesdropper or a peeping tom on or about the premises of another or to go upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming an eavesdropper or a peeping tom. The term "peeping tom", as used in this section, is defined as a person who peeps through windows, doors, or other like places, on or about the premises of another, for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon and any other conduct of a similar nature, that tends to invade the privacy of others. The term "peeping tom" also includes any person who employs the use of video or audio equipment for the purposes set forth in this section. A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Anthony Helton (2019) read the section's voyeurism subsection to require knowingly viewing a person without consent, where privacy is expected, for sexual arousal or gratification, and held that conviction a sex offense requiring federal registration. State v. Harris (1987) held peeping tom a crime of moral turpitude.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Holmes (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 320 S.C. 259)✓At a capital murder trial the defense was barred from impeaching a jailhouse witness with his 1984 Peeping Tom conviction; the court held that was error because a section 16-17-470 violation is a crime of moral turpitude, but found the error harmless.
- State v. Harris (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1987, 293 S.C. 75)✓A man tried for assault with intent to commit sexual conduct with a minor was impeached with a prior Peeping Tom conviction; the court held the section 16-17-470 offense is a crime of moral turpitude, so using it to attack his credibility was proper.
- In re Parrott (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2017, 421 S.C. 105)“…ondent was arrested and charged with voyeurism pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 (B) (2015) after he used a cell phone t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights for Renters and Landlords (2026), South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026), South Carolina School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights (2026)
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 30: PUBLIC RECORDS
§ 30-4-10Short titleIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
This chapter shall be known and cited as the "Freedom of Information Act".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1996, 323 S.C. 384)“…e South Carolina Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), S.C. Code Ann. §§ 30-4-10 to -110 (1991 & Supp. 1994). Appellant…”
- Bellamy v. Brown (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1991, 305 S.C. 291)“…iality arising from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), S.C. Code Ann. § 30-4-10 — 110 (1991). We affirm. FACTS…”
- Weston v. Carolina Research & Development Foundation (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1991, 303 S.C. 398)“…Acting Associate Justices, concur. 1 S.C. Code Ann. § 30-4-10 to § 30-4-110 (Supp. 1989).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Laws on Recording in Public: Your Rights Explained (2026), South Carolina Freedom of Information Act: How to Request Public Records
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 41: LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
§ 41-10-10DefinitionsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
As used in this chapter: (1) "Employer" means every person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, receiver, or other officer of a court of this State, the State or any political subdivision thereof, and any agent or officer of the above classes employing any person in this State. (2) "Wages" means all amounts at which labor rendered is recompensed, whether the amount is fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece, or commission basis, or other method of calculating the amount and includes vacation, holiday, and sick leave payments which are due to an employee under any employer policy or employment contract. Funds placed in pension plans or profit sharing plans are not wages subject to this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 72 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dumas v. InfoSafe Corp. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1995, 320 S.C. 188)“…n action against InfoSafe and Maguire, alleged violation of S.C. Code Ann. Sections 41-10-10 through -110 (Supp. 1994) (the South Ca…”
- Nichols v. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1991, 305 S.C. 323)“…orari to the Court of Appeals. The action was brought under S.C. Code § 41-10-10 et seq. by an elected mana…”
- Rice v. Multimedia, Inc. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 318 S.C. 95)“…al, Moore and Waller, JJ., concur. 1 S.C. Code Ann. § 41-10-10 et seq. (Supp. 1993).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: PTO Payout Laws: Does Your State Require It When You Leave a Job?, South Carolina Final Paycheck Laws: The 48-Hour-or-30-Day Rule, South Carolina Severance Pay Laws (2026): Is Severance Required?
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 8: PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
§ 8-27-10DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
For purposes of this chapter: (1) "Public body" means a department of the State; a state board, commission, committee, agency, or authority; a public or governmental body or political subdivision of the State, including counties, municipalities, school districts, or special purpose or public service districts; an organization, corporation, or agency supported in whole or in part by public funds or expending public funds; or a quasi-governmental body of the State and its political subdivisions. (2) "Employee" means an employee of a department of the State; a state board, commission, committee, agency, or authority; a public or governmental body or political subdivision of the State, including counties, municipalities, school districts, or special purpose or public service districts; an organization, corporation, or agency supported in whole or in part by public funds or expending public funds; or a quasi-governmental body of the State and its political subdivisions. "Employee" does not include those persons enumerated within the provisions of Section 8-17-370.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Spencer v. Barnwell County Hospital (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1994, 314 S.C. 405)“…nably conclude that Spencer was terminated in violation of S.C. Code Ann. §§ 8-27-10 to -50 (Supp. 1992), the order of the…”
- Belton v. State (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1994, 313 S.C. 549)“…complaint alleged violation of the Whistleblower Statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 8-27-10 et seq. (Supp. 1992).…”
- Gastineau v. Murphy (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1996, 323 S.C. 168)“…s is an action under the South Carolina Whistleblower Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 8-27-10 et seq. (Supp. 1991), in which the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
§ 8-27-50Application of Chapter 27In force
The provisions of this chapter do not apply to nonpublic, private corporations.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 441 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-17 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Record My Boss Harassing Me? State-by-State Legal Guide (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES § 17-30-10 (Interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications authorized) · South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES § 16-17-10 (Barratry prohibited)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17, Chapter 30 -- Wiretapping(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16, Chapter 17 -- Voyeurism(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Payment of Wages Act(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Human Affairs Commission(schac.sc.gov).gov
- National Labor Relations Act(nlrb.gov).gov
- U.S. EEOC(eeoc.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2511 -- Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
- S.C. Code Ann. 41-15-510 and 41-15-520 (occupational safety retaliation; 30-day complaint deadline)(scstatehouse.gov).gov