South Carolina
South Carolina Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Peeping, and Penalties (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Carolina criminalizes voyeurism and unlawful recording under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, which prohibits peeping and eavesdropping on another person's premises (including with video or audio equipment) and, for a sexual purpose, viewing or recording someone without their knowledge and consent in a place where they would reasonably expect privacy. Penalties range from a misdemeanor for simple peeping and a first voyeurism offense to a felony carrying up to 10 years for aggravated voyeurism, meaning the sale or distribution of an unlawfully made recording.
South Carolina takes voyeurism offenses seriously, with multiple statutes addressing different forms of invasive recording and observation. The primary voyeurism law at S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 covers peeping, electronic surveillance in private spaces, and video voyeurism. A newer statute enacted in 2025, S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332, addresses the non-consensual distribution of intimate images.
This guide explains what South Carolina law prohibits, the penalties for each type of offense, how the courts apply these statutes, and what to do if you are a victim of voyeurism.
Understanding S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470
What the Statute Covers
South Carolina's voyeurism statute at S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 prohibits three categories of conduct:
Peeping. Under subsection (A), it is illegal to be a "peeping tom" on or about the premises of another, meaning someone who peeps through windows, doors, or similar places to spy on or invade the privacy of the people there. The statute says the term also covers anyone who uses video or audio equipment for that purpose. This covers the traditional "Peeping Tom" scenario where someone looks into another person's home to observe them without consent.
Eavesdropping. Subsection (A) also makes it illegal to be an eavesdropper on or about the premises of another, or to go onto someone's premises to eavesdrop. While the wiretapping statute at S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-20 covers electronic interception of communications, the voyeurism statute provides an additional layer of protection against physically positioning yourself to overhear private conversations.
Voyeurism. Under subsection (B), a person commits voyeurism if, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire, they knowingly view, photograph, record, or film another person, without that person's knowledge and consent, while the person is in a place where they would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Hidden cameras and spy cameras are a common way it happens. Subsection (C) separately makes it aggravated voyeurism to knowingly sell or distribute a recording made in violation of the statute.
The Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Standard
The voyeurism offense hinges on whether the victim was in a place where they would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The statute defines that term itself. Under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470(D)(1), it means:
- A place where a reasonable person would believe they could undress in privacy, without being concerned that their undressing was being photographed, filmed, or videotaped by another, or
- A place where one would reasonably expect to be safe from hostile intrusion or surveillance
Places that typically fit that definition include:
- Private residences and hotel rooms
- Bathrooms and restrooms (both public and private)
- Locker rooms and changing rooms
- Hospital rooms and medical examination rooms
- Fitting rooms in retail stores
- Tanning booths and spa treatment rooms
- Any enclosed space where a person might undress
Criminal Penalties for Voyeurism

Penalty Structure
South Carolina's voyeurism penalties vary based on the severity of the offense and the method used, escalating for repeat offenses and for selling or distributing an unlawfully made recording:

| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Simple peeping (first offense) | Misdemeanor | Up to 3 years in prison and/or up to $500 fine |
| Voyeurism, first offense (sexual gratification purpose) | Misdemeanor | Up to 3 years in prison and/or up to $500 fine |
| Voyeurism, second or subsequent offense (sexual gratification purpose) | Felony | Up to 5 years in prison |
| Aggravated voyeurism (selling or distributing an unlawfully made recording) | Felony | Up to 10 years in prison |
| Repeat peeping offense | Same misdemeanor penalty (16-17-470(A) sets no repeat-offense escalation) | Court discretion on sentencing |
What Raises the Penalty
South Carolina's voyeurism statute raises the penalty in only two ways: a second or later voyeurism offense becomes a felony, and selling or distributing an unlawful recording is aggravated voyeurism. The statute lists no other aggravating factors. Within the statutory range, the sentence is up to the judge. Anyone convicted must also forfeit the recordings, which are destroyed once they are no longer needed as evidence (16-17-470(F)).
Sex Offender Registration
South Carolina's Sex Offender Registry Act (S.C. Code Ann. 23-3-430) requires registration for certain offenses. Under § 23-3-430(C)(1)(e), a conviction for peeping, voyeurism, or aggravated voyeurism under S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 is classified as a Tier I offense, which triggers mandatory sex offender registration. This applies to a simple peeping conviction the same as it applies to the aggravated forms of the offense; registration for this offense category is not left to judicial discretion.
Registration means reporting to the sheriff twice a year (S.C. Code Ann. 23-3-460) and a public listing. The statute frames registration as lifelong, but a Tier I offender, which includes anyone convicted under 16-17-470, may apply to end it after 15 years (S.C. Code Ann. 23-3-462). South Carolina's 1,000-foot residency restriction (23-3-535) covers listed child-sex, child-kidnapping, and child-trafficking offenses and does not apply to a voyeurism conviction. The public registry is maintained by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED).
The 2025 Intimate Images Law: S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332

Why the Law Was Enacted
South Carolina was the last state in the nation to enact a law addressing the non-consensual distribution of intimate images. On May 12, 2025, Governor Henry McMaster signed S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332 into law, closing a significant gap in the state's privacy protections.
What the Law Prohibits
The statute makes it a crime to intentionally share an intimate image, or an AI-generated "digitally forged" intimate image, of another person without that person's effective consent. The law applies when:
- The person depicted is identifiable from the image itself or from accompanying information
- The image shows the kinds of nudity or sexual activity defined in S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-330(4)
- The person sharing it knew or reasonably should have known the image was obtained or created under circumstances where the depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy
Agreeing to have the image taken, or sending it privately to one person, does not count as consent to further sharing (16-15-332(A)).
Penalties Under S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| First offense, no intent to harm | Misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in prison, up to $5,000 fine |
| Second or subsequent offense, no intent to harm | Felony | Up to 5 years in prison, up to $5,000 fine |
| First offense, with intent to harm or for profit | Felony | Up to 5 years in prison, up to $5,000 fine |
| Second or subsequent offense, with intent to harm or for profit | Felony | Mandatory minimum of 1 year, up to 10 years in prison, up to $10,000 fine (no part of the minimum may be suspended or replaced with probation) |
AI-Generated Deepfakes
A notable feature of the 2025 law is its coverage of AI-generated content. The statute applies to digitally forged or AI-altered images that falsely depict someone in intimate situations. It punishes sharing such an image; making a deepfake of an adult is not by itself a crime under this law. Creating, sharing, or possessing an AI-altered sexual image of an identifiable minor is a separate felony under South Carolina's sexual exploitation of a minor statutes (S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-395, 16-15-405 and 16-15-410, as amended in 2025).
Civil Remedies for Victims
The 2025 criminal law does not itself create a lawsuit. The civil remedy comes from a separate 2026 law, the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act (S.C. Code Ann. 15-75-310 to -370, effective May 15, 2026, for claims arising on or after that date). It lets an identifiable person sue someone who intentionally disclosed, or threatened to disclose, a private intimate image of them without consent. A court can award:
- Actual damages, including for emotional distress, or statutory damages of up to $10,000 per defendant, whichever is greater
- Any profit the defendant made from the disclosure
- Punitive damages as allowed under South Carolina law
- Reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and an injunction or other relief
A suit over a disclosure generally must be filed within three years of when it was discovered or should have been discovered; a suit over a threat must be filed within four years of the threat, and the clock does not start for a minor until age 18 (15-75-360). A plaintiff may ask the court to seal filings to protect their identity (15-75-340). Federal law (15 U.S.C. 6851) also provides a civil action.
Hidden Cameras: Where the Law Draws the Line

Hidden Cameras That Are Illegal
South Carolina's voyeurism law is about what the recorder does and why, not only where a camera is mounted. Using a hidden camera to view or record someone, without their knowledge and consent and for a sexual purpose, in a place where they would reasonably expect privacy is voyeurism under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470(B). Separately, using video or audio equipment to spy on people on or about another person's premises is peeping under subsection (A). The places where hidden cameras most often lead to charges include:
- Bathrooms and restrooms in any setting (homes, businesses, public facilities)
- Locker rooms at gyms, pools, schools, and workplaces
- Changing rooms and fitting rooms in retail stores
- Bedrooms (including guest rooms, hotel rooms, and Airbnb properties)
- Medical examination rooms and treatment areas
- Tanning booths and spa rooms
The statute is written around places rather than body parts, so up-skirt filming in an otherwise public place is a gray area under it, though prosecutors may still bring charges.
If the hidden camera also records audio, the device may additionally violate the wiretapping statute at S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-20, resulting in separate felony charges carrying up to 5 years in prison and $5,000 in fines.
Hidden Cameras That May Be Legal
South Carolina law does not prohibit all hidden cameras. Cameras may be legal when:
- Installed in your own home in non-private common areas (living room, kitchen, front porch)
- Used for legitimate security purposes on your business premises in non-private areas
- Positioned to monitor public areas or property you own
- Used by law enforcement with proper legal authorization
Even when a hidden camera is technically legal, you must be careful about audio recording. If the camera captures conversations, the one-party consent rule under S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-30 requires that you be a party to the conversation or have consent from at least one participant.
Voyeurism in Specific Contexts
Workplace Voyeurism
An employer, manager, or coworker who uses a hidden camera to view or record employees in a bathroom, locker room, or changing area for a sexual purpose commits voyeurism. A camera in those areas installed for another reason still invites wiretapping charges if it captures conversations and civil invasion-of-privacy claims, and these are the areas where such claims most often arise. Employees who discover hidden cameras in private workplace areas should:
- Document the camera's location without touching it
- Report the discovery to HR or management (if they are not the ones responsible)
- Contact local law enforcement
- Consult with an attorney about civil remedies
Landlord Voyeurism
Landlords who install hidden cameras inside rental units can face several offenses. Depending on the purpose and placement, in addition to peeping or voyeurism charges, a landlord may face:
- Wiretapping charges if the cameras record audio
- Invasion of privacy civil claims
- Tenant remedies for a knowing unlawful entry into the unit under S.C. Code Ann. 27-40-780(b), including an injunction or ending the rental agreement, plus actual damages and attorney's fees
School Settings
Recording students in bathrooms, locker rooms, or other private areas on school grounds is a particularly serious offense. A second or subsequent violation is a felony carrying up to 5 years in prison, and selling or distributing the recording is aggravated voyeurism carrying up to 10 years. School employees who engage in voyeurism also face termination, loss of teaching credentials, and sex offender registration.
Retail and Hospitality Settings
Business owners and employees who install cameras in fitting rooms, restrooms, or hotel rooms face criminal prosecution. The hospitality industry has seen high-profile cases involving hidden cameras in short-term rental properties (Airbnb, VRBO). Guests who discover hidden cameras should immediately contact law enforcement and document the camera's location and type.
Intersection with Federal Law
Video Voyeurism Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 1801)
The federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act prohibits photographing or recording the private areas of an individual without consent in circumstances where the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy. This federal law applies only within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, such as certain federal enclaves, and does not reach ordinary homes, rentals, or businesses in South Carolina.
The federal penalty is a fine, up to one year in prison, or both. The statute has no separate tier for minor victims; where images of a minor are sexually explicit, separate federal child exploitation laws can apply.
PROTECT Act Provisions
In cases where voyeurism involves minors and the images constitute child pornography, federal laws including the PROTECT Act (Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act) may apply, carrying significantly harsher penalties than state-level voyeurism charges.
How to Report Voyeurism in South Carolina
Steps for Victims
If you discover that you have been a victim of voyeurism in South Carolina:
- Do not touch or remove the camera. Leave it in place so law enforcement can collect it as evidence.
- Call local law enforcement immediately. File a police report and provide details about the camera's location, type, and any identifying information.
- Document everything. Take photographs of the camera's location from multiple angles. Note the date, time, and circumstances of discovery.
- Preserve digital evidence. If images or videos have been distributed, screenshot the posts or messages and save URLs before they are taken down.
- Contact an attorney. A lawyer can advise you on both criminal proceedings and civil remedies, including potential lawsuits for damages.
- Seek support. Contact the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-4673 for confidential support and resources.
Reporting to Law Enforcement
You can report voyeurism to:
- Your local police department or sheriff's office
- The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) for cases involving technology or multiple jurisdictions
- The FBI if federal law may apply (for example, conduct on a federal enclave, sexual images of a minor, or images shared online)
Bill 3042 (Not Enacted)
Bill 3042 in the 2025-2026 South Carolina legislative session would have updated the voyeurism statute (S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470) to:
- Explicitly cover AI-generated deepfake images used for voyeuristic purposes
- Increase penalties for technology-assisted voyeurism
- Add provisions addressing emerging surveillance technologies
Bill 3042 never left the House Judiciary Committee, where it was referred on January 14, 2025, and the bill did not become law in the 2025-2026 session. A future session could take up a similar proposal; check the South Carolina Legislature website for new bills.
Defenses to Voyeurism Charges
Common Legal Defenses
Defendants charged with voyeurism in South Carolina may raise several defenses:
- Consent. If the alleged victim consented to being observed or recorded, this is a complete defense. However, consent must be genuine, voluntary, and informed.
- No reasonable expectation of privacy. If the observation or recording occurred in a location where no reasonable expectation of privacy existed, the voyeurism statute does not apply.
- Lack of intent or purpose. For voyeurism, the prosecution must prove the defendant acted knowingly and for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification. Accidental or inadvertent recording does not satisfy this element.
- Constitutional challenges. Defendants sometimes raise First Amendment objections to voyeurism charges. Section 16-17-470 remains in force, and a criminal defense lawyer can say whether such a challenge has any footing in a specific case.
South Carolina Recording Law Sub-Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to South Carolina Recording Laws
More South Carolina Recording Topics
More South Carolina Laws
- South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws
- South Carolina Dashcam Laws
- South Carolina Data Privacy Laws
- South Carolina Deepfake Laws
- South Carolina Employee Monitoring Laws
- South Carolina GPS Tracking Laws
- South Carolina Police Bodycam Laws
- South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for voyeurism in South Carolina?
Penalties vary by offense severity. Simple peeping and a first voyeurism offense are misdemeanors carrying up to 3 years in prison. A second or subsequent voyeurism offense is a felony carrying up to 5 years. Aggravated voyeurism, meaning selling or distributing an unlawfully made recording, is a felony carrying up to 10 years. Any conviction under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, including simple peeping, is a Tier I offense under the Sex Offender Registry Act and requires registration.
Are hidden cameras illegal in South Carolina?
A hidden camera is a crime under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 when it is used to view or record someone, without their knowledge and consent and for a sexual purpose, in a place where they would expect privacy, such as a bathroom, locker room, or changing room, or when it is used to spy on people on another person's premises. For voyeurism, a first offense is a misdemeanor and a second or subsequent offense is a felony carrying up to 5 years in prison. Hidden cameras in non-private areas like your own living room or a business lobby are generally legal.
Is revenge porn illegal in South Carolina?
Yes. Since May 2025, S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332 makes it a crime to distribute intimate images without the depicted person's consent. Without intent to harm, a first offense is a misdemeanor (up to 1 year and $5,000 fine) and a second or subsequent offense is a felony (up to 5 years and $5,000 fine). Distribution with intent to cause harm or for profit is a felony starting with the first offense (up to 5 years and $5,000 fine), rising to a mandatory minimum of 1 year and up to 10 years and a $10,000 fine for a second or subsequent offense. The law also covers AI-generated deepfakes.
Can I be charged with voyeurism for recording in a public place?
Generally no. Voyeurism charges require that the recording occur in a place where the victim has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Recording in a truly public space does not violate the voyeurism statute. The statute is written around places rather than body parts, so up-skirt filming in an otherwise public place is a gray area under it, though prosecutors may still bring charges under it or other laws.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in a rental property or hotel room in South Carolina?
Do not touch the camera. Call local law enforcement immediately to file a report. Document the camera's location with photographs. Contact the property management company to report the issue. Consult with an attorney about potential civil claims for invasion of privacy. If intimate images were shared or someone threatened to share them, you may also have a civil claim under South Carolina's 2026 intimate-images civil remedy law (S.C. Code Ann. 15-75-310 to -370), and sharing them can be a crime under S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332.
Updates
Replaced an unsourced statement about breaking a lease with the tenant remedies S.C. Code 27-40-780(b) provides when a landlord knowingly enters a unit unlawfully.
We corrected the voyeurism elements (a sexual purpose and lack of knowledge and consent are required), replaced an unsourced court test with the statute's own definition, fixed the registration and residency description, replaced invented civil remedies with the 2026 civil law (damages up to $10,000 per defendant and a three-year filing deadline), and corrected the scope of the federal video voyeurism statute and the status of Bill 3042.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Rebuilt the S.C. Code Ann. 16-15-332 penalty table and the matching FAQ answer to include the statute's harshest tier, which the page had omitted: a second or subsequent intimate-image distribution offense committed with intent to harm carries a mandatory minimum of one year up to ten years in prison and a $10,000 fine, not the 5-year/$5,000 ceiling the page previously stated as the maximum.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the false claim that simple peeping does not automatically require sex offender registration; S.C. Code § 23-3-430(C)(1)(e) lists peeping, voyeurism, and aggravated voyeurism under § 16-17-470 together as a single Tier I registrable offense.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470's penalty structure: using an electronic device does not itself make peeping a felony, and the statute has no minor-victim sentencing enhancement. The felony tiers are a second-or-subsequent voyeurism offense (up to 5 years) and aggravated voyeurism -- selling or distributing an unlawfully made recording (up to 10 years).
Removed three remaining restatements of the corrected S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470 felony-tier mechanism: the statute's felony tiers turn on repeat offense and sale/distribution of a recording, not on the victim's age.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-17-470Eavesdropping, peeping, voyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(A) It is unlawful for a person to be an eavesdropper or a peeping tom on or about the premises of another or to go upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming an eavesdropper or a peeping tom. The term "peeping tom", as used in this section, is defined as a person who peeps through windows, doors, or other like places, on or about the premises of another, for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon and any other conduct of a similar nature, that tends to invade the privacy of others. The term "peeping tom" also includes any person who employs the use of video or audio equipment for the purposes set forth in this section. A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Anthony Helton (2019) read the section's voyeurism subsection to require knowingly viewing a person without consent, where privacy is expected, for sexual arousal or gratification, and held that conviction a sex offense requiring federal registration. State v. Harris (1987) held peeping tom a crime of moral turpitude.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Holmes (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 320 S.C. 259)✓At a capital murder trial the defense was barred from impeaching a jailhouse witness with his 1984 Peeping Tom conviction; the court held that was error because a section 16-17-470 violation is a crime of moral turpitude, but found the error harmless.
- State v. Harris (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1987, 293 S.C. 75)✓A man tried for assault with intent to commit sexual conduct with a minor was impeached with a prior Peeping Tom conviction; the court held the section 16-17-470 offense is a crime of moral turpitude, so using it to attack his credibility was proper.
- In re Parrott (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2017, 421 S.C. 105)“…ondent was arrested and charged with voyeurism pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 (B) (2015) after he used a cell phone t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, South Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Carolina Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 16-15-332Disseminating intimate images without consentIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(A) A person who intentionally disseminates an intimate image or a digitally forged intimate image of another person without the effective consent of the depicted person is guilty of the unauthorized disclosure of intimate images. A person intentionally disseminates an intimate image or a digitally forged intimate image if he has knowledge that the image was obtained or created under circumstances when he knew or reasonably should have known the person depicted had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Any dissemination of multiple intimate images of the same individual as part of a common act is a single offense. The fact that the identifiable individual: (1) provided affirmative consent for the creation of the intimate image shall not establish that the individual provided effective consent for the dissemination of the intimate image; and (2) disclosed the intimate image to another individual shall not establish that the identifiable individual provided effective consent for the dissemination of the intimate image by the person alleged to have violated this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Also relied on in: South Carolina Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights for Renters and Landlords (2026), South Carolina Video Recording Laws: Where You Can and Cannot Record (2026), South Carolina AI Laws and Regulation (2026)
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
§ 17-30-20Prohibited actsIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, a person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be punished as provided in Section 17-30-50 of this chapter: (1) intentionally intercepts, attempts to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication; (2) intentionally uses, attempts to use, or procures any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (a) the device is affixed to or otherwise transmits a signal through a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or (b) the device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of the communication; (3) intentionally discloses or attempts to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; (4) intentionally uses or attempts to use the contents of any wire, oral, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ducharme v. Madewell Concrete LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)“…the intentional interception of electronic communications. S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-20; 18 U.S.C. § 2511. The critical inquir…”
- Carson v. Emergency MD LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2020)“…SCHSA’s list of prohibited acts require interception. See S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-20. The SCHSA defines “intercept” as “the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for Calls (2026), South Carolina Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
§ 17-30-30Interception by employee of Federal Communications Commission, by person acting under color or law, and when party has given prior consentIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(A) It is lawful under this chapter for an officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, in the normal course of his employment and in discharge of the monitoring responsibilities exercised by the commission in the enforcement of 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5, to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication transmitted by radio or to disclose or use the information thereby obtained. (B) It is lawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception. (C) It is lawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McNeely (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)“…a showing. The South Carolina statute cited by Plaintiff—S.C. Code § 17-30-30—provides “it is lawful . . . for a per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026), South Carolina Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits (2026)
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 23: LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY
§ 23-3-430Sex offender registryIn force
(A) Any person, regardless of age, residing in the State of South Carolina who in this State has been convicted of, pled guilty or nolo contendere to an offense described below, or who has been convicted, pled guilty or nolo contendere, or found not guilty by reason of insanity in any comparable court in the United States, or a foreign country, or who has been convicted, pled guilty or nolo contendere, or found not guilty by reason of insanity in the United States federal courts of a similar offense, or who has been convicted of, pled guilty or nolo contendere, or found not guilty by reason of insanity to an offense for which the person was required to register in the state where the conviction or plea occurred, shall be required to register pursuant to the provisions of this article. A person who has been found not guilty by reason of insanity shall not be required to register pursuant to the provisions of this article unless and until the person is declared to no longer be insane or is ordered to register by the trial judge.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John Doe v. Mark Keel (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2023)“…during a twelve-month period is a resident of this State." S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-430(B). Therefore, we rephrase the certifie…”
- Thompson v. State (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2016, 415 S.C. 560)“…the four kidnapping offenses were not sexual in nature. See S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-430(C)(15) (2007 & Supp. 2014) (stating tha…”
- In the Interest of Kevin R. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2014, 409 S.C. 297)“…s or her report "the facts of the offense"). 7 See, e.g., S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-430(A) (2007) (stating, in part, "Any perso…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 1801Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 81 of our articles
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. In this section— the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast; the term “broadcast” means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons; the term “a private area of the individual” means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; the term “female breast” means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; and the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means— circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or circumstances in which a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied 18 U.S.C. 1801 mainly at its edges. United States v. Johnson (2010) read it as Congress's answer to secretly filming nudity on federal property, acquitting on a child exploitation charge instead. EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security (2011) applied the Section 1801(c) law enforcement exception to a TSA scanner claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Helton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 944 F.3d 198)“…from this list of federal offenses is video voyeurism under 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Rather than list this statute as an enu…”
- United States v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2010, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1059)✓A weightlifting coach hid a camera to film minors weighing in nude; acquitting him under the child exploitation statute, the court called that conduct plain video voyeurism under section 1801, but noted the section reaches only federal maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 653 F.3d 1)✓Privacy groups challenged TSA body scanners under the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act; the D.C. Circuit held the statute's exception for lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity applied to airport screening, so the section 1801 claim failed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), California Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES § 16-17-10 (Barratry prohibited) · South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES § 16-15-10 (Bigamy)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16, Chapter 17 -- Offenses Against Public Policy (Voyeurism)(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16, Chapter 15 -- Offenses Against Morality and Decency(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- Gov. McMaster Signs Intimate Images Bill Into Law (May 2025)(governor.sc.gov).gov
- South Carolina Sex Offender Registry Act (S.C. Code Ann. 23-3-430)(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED)(sled.sc.gov).gov
- 2025-2026 Bill 3042: Voyeurism Updates (not enacted; died in House Judiciary)(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 1801 -- Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
- S.C. Code Ann. 15-75-310 to -370, Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act (2026 Act No. 131)(scstatehouse.gov).gov