South Carolina
South Carolina Laws on Recording in Public: Your Rights Explained (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Carolina has no statute restricting open photography or video recording in public spaces, apart from places like restrooms and changing areas that the voyeurism law covers, and federal appeals courts have widely recognized a First Amendment right to record in public. Audio recording of conversations in public is also generally permitted, because the wiretap law protects only conversations spoken with a justified expectation that they will not be intercepted (S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-15).
Recording in public spaces is one of the most broadly protected activities under both federal constitutional law and South Carolina state law. Whether you are photographing a scenic view, filming a protest, recording a street performer, or documenting an interaction with a government official, South Carolina law provides significant protections for public recording. This guide explains your rights, the limits, and what to do when someone challenges your right to record.
Your Right to Record in Public
First Amendment Protection
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the right to gather information in public spaces. Eight federal appeals courts (the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits) have held that the First Amendment protects recording police officers doing their jobs in public, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner limits. In the Fourth Circuit, which includes South Carolina, Sharpe v. Winterville Police Department (2023) held that livestreaming a police traffic stop is speech protected by the First Amendment; the officer in that case still received qualified immunity, and the court did not decide whether there is a broader right to record police in public. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the question, and the Sixth, Eighth, and D.C. Circuits have not recognized the right.

Courts that recognize the right have applied it to:
- Still photography
- Video recording (with or without audio)
- Livestreaming to social media platforms
- Audio recording of public events and conversations
The right to record in public is not absolute. Courts that recognize it allow reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions, such as keeping a safe distance from an active police scene.
South Carolina State Law
South Carolina does not have a statute that restricts open recording in public places. The main exception is the voyeurism statute, S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, which makes it a crime to secretly view or record someone for a sexual purpose in a place where they could expect to undress in privacy (such as a restroom or changing area, even inside a public building) or where they would reasonably expect to be safe from hostile intrusion or surveillance. Subsection (A) of the same statute separately bars peeping or eavesdropping on or about the premises of another, including with video or audio equipment, to spy on or invade someone's privacy, with no sexual-purpose requirement.
The state's wiretapping law defines "oral communication" at S.C. Code Ann. 17-30-15 as an utterance made with a reasonable expectation of privacy. Conversations in public spaces where others can overhear generally do not carry this expectation, so recording them does not violate the wiretapping statute.
Video-only recording in public never implicates the wiretapping law, since the statute covers oral and wire communications, not visual recordings.
Audio recording in public is generally permissible because the speakers in a public setting typically do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. However, if someone takes deliberate steps to have a private conversation in public (stepping away from others, whispering, speaking in a secluded area), a court might find that a privacy expectation existed.
Where You Can Record in Public

Streets, Sidewalks, and Public Rights-of-Way
Public streets, sidewalks, and rights-of-way are traditional public forums where recording is most strongly protected. You can:
- Film on any public sidewalk or crosswalk
- Record from a public street or roadway (safely, without obstructing traffic)
- Photograph buildings, storefronts, and public art from public vantage points
- Film public infrastructure (bridges, roads, utility installations)
- Record natural disasters, accidents, or other newsworthy events
You do not need a permit to record for personal, journalistic, or documentary purposes. Permits may be required for large-scale commercial film productions that require road closures or special equipment.
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
South Carolina's state parks, county parks, and municipal parks are public spaces where recording is permitted. You can:
- Photograph landscapes, wildlife, and scenery
- Film recreational activities
- Record events held in public park spaces
- Document conditions in public parks
Some parks may have specific rules about commercial photography or drone use, but personal recording of open, public areas is generally allowed.
Government Buildings and Public Meetings
South Carolina's Freedom of Information Act (S.C. Code Ann. 30-4-10 et seq.) requires most government meetings to be open to the public. You have the right to record:
- City and county council meetings
- School board meetings
- State boards, commissions, and agencies
- Planning and zoning commission meetings
- Public budget hearings
- Any meeting of a public body required to be open under FOIA
Under S.C. Code Ann. 30-4-90(c), anyone attending a meeting of a public body may record all or part of it by audio or video, as long as the recording does not actively interfere with the conduct of the meeting. Closed sessions held under 30-4-70 may not be recorded, and the public body does not have to provide recording equipment.
For the interiors of government buildings outside of public meetings, rules vary by facility. Courthouses, for example, may restrict photography and recording in certain areas at the discretion of the presiding judge. Federal buildings within South Carolina follow separate federal regulations.
Public Transportation
Recording on public transportation in South Carolina is generally permitted. Bus stops, train platforms, and the exterior of transit facilities are public spaces. Recording inside buses or transit vehicles may be subject to the transit authority's rules, but most public transit agencies acknowledge that passengers do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in shared public transit spaces.
Public Events and Gatherings
You can record at public events in South Carolina, including:
- Concerts and performances in public venues
- Parades and festivals on public streets
- Sporting events held on public property
- Protests, rallies, and demonstrations
- Farmers' markets and outdoor fairs
Note that privately organized events held on private property (even if open to the public) may have their own recording rules set by the organizer.
When Public Recording Is Restricted

Private Property Open to the Public
Businesses, shopping centers, restaurants, and other private properties that are open to the public can set their own recording policies. The property owner or manager can:
- Ask you to stop recording
- Require you to put away your camera or phone
- Ask you to leave the property if you refuse to comply
- Post signs prohibiting recording on their premises
If you continue recording after being told to stop on private property, you may face trespassing charges under S.C. Code Ann. 16-11-620, which criminalizes entering or remaining on property after being warned not to or after being asked to leave. The property owner does not need to cite a specific recording law because they have the right to control activities on their property.
Important distinction: A business can ask you to stop recording or leave, but they cannot legally confiscate your camera, phone, or recording device. Seizing your property without legal authority could constitute theft or conversion.
Courthouses and Courtrooms
South Carolina courts have broad discretion over recording in courthouses and courtrooms. Under Rule 605 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules, electronic media coverage of court proceedings is governed by specific guidelines:
- Recording in courtrooms is generally prohibited unless specifically authorized by the presiding judge
- Judges may permit media coverage of proceedings on a case-by-case basis
- Recording in hallways and public areas of courthouses may be restricted by local rules
- Federal courthouses within South Carolina follow federal court rules, which generally prohibit photography and recording inside the building
School Grounds
Recording on school property in South Carolina is subject to school district policies. While schools are public institutions, they have authority to restrict recording on campus for student safety and privacy reasons. Common restrictions include:
- No recording inside classrooms without teacher and administration permission
- Restrictions on recording students, particularly minors
- No recording in areas where students change clothes (locker rooms, gyms)
- FERPA considerations for recordings that capture student education records
Military Installations
Military bases and installations within South Carolina (such as Fort Jackson, Joint Base Charleston, and Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort) are federal property subject to military regulations. Photography and recording are generally restricted or prohibited on military installations without authorization.
Recording Other People in Public

Can You Record Strangers in Public?
Yes, with limits. When you are in a public space, you can generally record other people in that space whose appearance and actions are visible to others. The exceptions include places like public restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas, where secretly recording someone for a sexual purpose can be voyeurism under S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470. People in public do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their appearance or actions visible to others. This includes:
- Photographing people walking on a sidewalk
- Filming a street performer
- Recording someone making a scene in a public place
- Documenting a car accident
- Filming a police interaction visible from public areas
Harassment and Stalking Concerns
While you have the right to record in public, using recording as a tool of harassment or stalking can violate other South Carolina laws:
- Stalking (S.C. Code Ann. 16-3-1700) defines stalking as a pattern of words or conduct that serves no legitimate purpose and is intended to cause, and does cause, a reasonable person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, sexual contact, kidnapping, or property damage affecting them or their family. Repeatedly following and recording someone could be part of such a pattern.
- Harassment in the first degree, under the same section, is a pattern of intentional, unreasonable intrusion into someone's private life that serves no legitimate purpose and causes emotional distress. The statute lists following a person and surveillance near their home, work, or school as examples, so persistent, unwanted filming can qualify.
The line between exercising your recording rights and engaging in harassment depends on the context, your intent, the pattern of behavior, and the impact on the other person.
Commercial Use of Recordings
Recording someone in public for personal use is generally allowed, within the limits above. However, using someone's image or likeness for commercial purposes without their consent may violate their right of publicity under South Carolina common law. If you plan to use footage of identifiable individuals in advertising, marketing, or commercial products, obtain a signed release or photo and video consent form.
Recording at Protests and Demonstrations
Your Rights as a Recorder
South Carolina has a rich history of public protests and demonstrations. Recording a protest openly from a public place is widely treated as protected:
- You can film from any public vantage point
- You can record police activity at protests
- You can document arrests, use of force, and crowd control measures
- You can livestream protests in real time
- You can record counter-protesters and their activities
Police Interaction During Protests
In the Fourth Circuit, which includes South Carolina, Sharpe v. Winterville Police Department (2023) held that livestreaming a police traffic stop is speech protected by the First Amendment; the officer in that case still received qualified immunity, and the court did not decide whether there is a broader right to record police in public. Eight other federal appeals courts have recognized a right to record police in public, but no binding South Carolina or Fourth Circuit ruling spells out when an officer may tell you to stop recording. If you are ordered to move back, comply, and keep recording from a distance if you can do so safely.
Officers can:
- Establish perimeters and ask you to stay behind them
- Issue lawful orders to disperse if an unlawful assembly is declared
- Arrest you for violating curfew orders, trespassing, or other offenses (no South Carolina statute makes openly recording from a public place a crime by itself)
If you are arrested at a protest, your recording device and its contents are protected by the Fourth Amendment. Police generally need a warrant to search the contents of your phone, as established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), although they may hold the phone while they get one.
Drone Recording in Public Spaces
FAA Regulations
Drone recording in public spaces is subject to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations:
- Drones weighing more than 0.55 pounds must be registered with the FAA
- Recreational drone pilots must follow community-based safety guidelines
- Commercial drone operators need a Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate
- Drones must remain below 400 feet in uncontrolled airspace
- Flying over people or moving vehicles is restricted without specific waivers
South Carolina Drone Laws
South Carolina has limited drone-specific legislation. The general principles that apply:
- Drone recording in public spaces is treated similarly to other forms of public recording
- Using a drone to record in areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy (through windows, over fenced backyards) may violate the voyeurism statute
- Local ordinances in some South Carolina municipalities may restrict drone operations in certain areas
- State parks may have specific drone policies
Practical Tips for Recording in Public
Best Practices
- Know your rights. Understand that you have the legal right to record in public spaces in South Carolina.
- Stay on public property. As long as you are on a public sidewalk, street, or other public area, your recording is generally lawful, though police can still give lawful orders to move back.
- Do not obstruct. You can record, but you cannot block pedestrian or vehicle traffic, interfere with police operations, or create safety hazards.
- Be respectful. While you have the legal right to record, exercising that right respectfully can prevent confrontations.
- Know when you are on private property. Shopping centers, restaurants, and other businesses can restrict recording on their premises.
- Preserve your recordings. Back up footage to cloud storage or a separate device, especially if it may serve as evidence.
What to Do If Challenged
If someone confronts you about recording in public:
- Stay calm. Do not escalate the situation.
- State your rights. Calmly explain that recording in public spaces is legal in South Carolina.
- Do not hand over your device to a private person. A private person or business cannot make you hand over your phone. Police generally need a warrant to search the contents of your phone (Riley v. California, 2014), although they may hold the phone while they get one. Do not physically resist; say clearly that you do not consent to a search.
- Move to a public area if asked to leave private property. You can continue recording from a public sidewalk or street.
- Document the confrontation. If someone threatens you for recording, the confrontation itself may be worth documenting.
- Contact law enforcement if threatened. If someone physically threatens you or tries to take your device, call the police.
South Carolina Recording Law Sub-Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to South Carolina Recording Laws
More South Carolina Recording Topics
More South Carolina Laws
- South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws
- South Carolina Dashcam Laws
- South Carolina Data Privacy Laws
- South Carolina Deepfake Laws
- South Carolina Employee Monitoring Laws
- South Carolina GPS Tracking Laws
- South Carolina Police Bodycam Laws
- South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to record in public in South Carolina?
Generally, yes. No South Carolina law generally prohibits photography or video recording in public spaces, but the voyeurism statute, S.C. Code Ann. 16-17-470, protects places where a person could disrobe in privacy and places where one would reasonably expect to be safe from hostile intrusion or surveillance. Federal appeals courts widely recognize a First Amendment right to record in public places such as streets, sidewalks, and parks, though secretly recording someone in a restroom, locker room, or changing area can be voyeurism. Audio recording in public is also generally legal because conversations in public spaces do not carry a reasonable expectation of privacy under the wiretapping statute.
Can a business ask me to stop recording in their store?
Yes. Private property owners and businesses can set their own recording policies and ask you to stop recording or leave the premises. If you refuse to leave after being asked, you may face trespassing charges under S.C. Code Ann. 16-11-620. However, the business cannot confiscate your camera or phone.
Can I record a public government meeting in South Carolina?
Yes. Under S.C. Code Ann. 30-4-90(c), anyone attending a meeting of a public body may record all or part of it by audio or video, as long as the recording does not actively interfere with the meeting. Closed sessions may not be recorded.
Do I need a permit to film in public in South Carolina?
No permit is needed for personal, journalistic, or documentary recording in public spaces. Permits may be required for large-scale commercial film productions that need road closures, special equipment setups, or exclusive use of public areas. Check with the local municipality for commercial filming permit requirements.
Can I record someone in public without their consent in South Carolina?
Yes. People in public spaces do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their appearance and actions. You can generally photograph or film people in a public area without their consent, except in places such as restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas, where secret recording can be voyeurism. However, using someone's image for commercial purposes without consent may violate their right of publicity, and repeatedly following someone to record them could constitute stalking.
Updates
Added that South Carolina's 16-17-470(A) separately bars peeping or eavesdropping on another's premises, including with recording equipment, without any sexual-purpose requirement.
Added the second half of South Carolina's voyeurism definition of a private place: somewhere a person would reasonably expect to be safe from hostile intrusion or surveillance.
Softened an absolute statement about recording in public and added that S.C. Code 16-17-470 also protects places where a person would reasonably expect to be safe from hostile intrusion or surveillance.
We corrected the page's account of the right to record police in South Carolina (the Fourth Circuit has protected livestreaming a traffic stop but has not decided a broader right), fixed a statement implying police need a warrant to take your phone (they need one to search it), noted that restrooms and changing areas are covered by the voyeurism law even in public buildings, and aligned the meeting-recording, stalking and harassment rules with the statutes.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected three instances of a wrong section number. The 'oral communication' / reasonable-expectation-of-privacy definition the article attributes to S.C. Code 17-30-20 actually lives at 17-30-15, the chapter's definitions section; 17-30-20 is instead the prohibited-acts section.
Corrected the refuse-to-leave trespass citation from S.C. Code Ann. 16-11-610 (a hunting/fishing/timber trespass statute) to 16-11-620, the actual entering-after-warning/refusing-to-leave trespass statute.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
§ 17-30-30Interception by employee of Federal Communications Commission, by person acting under color or law, and when party has given prior consentIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(A) It is lawful under this chapter for an officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, in the normal course of his employment and in discharge of the monitoring responsibilities exercised by the commission in the enforcement of 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5, to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication transmitted by radio or to disclose or use the information thereby obtained. (B) It is lawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception. (C) It is lawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McNeely (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)“…a showing. The South Carolina statute cited by Plaintiff—S.C. Code § 17-30-30—provides “it is lawful . . . for a per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, South Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Carolina Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 17-30-15DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
As used in this chapter: (1) "Wire communication" means any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception including the use of this connection in a switching station furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing or operating the facilities for the transmission of intrastate, interstate, or foreign communications or communications affecting intrastate, interstate, or foreign commerce. The term includes any electronic storage of the communication. (2) "Oral communication" means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that the communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying the expectation and does not mean any public oral communication uttered at a public meeting or any electronic communication. (3) "Intercept" means the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Fast Formliners Company v. Construction Resource Group, Inc. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2025)“…ed to intercept a wire, electronic, or oral communication." S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-15(4)(a)(i) (2014) ("'Electronic, mechani…”
- TELECO Inc v. Mutolo (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)“…Mutolo’s consent was not needed to record the call. See SC Code Ann. 17-30-15, 17-30-30. Therefore, Mutolo has fai…”
- Ducharme v. Madewell Concrete LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)“…h the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.” S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-15(3); 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). Research has…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-11-620Entering premises after warning or refusing to leave on request; jurisdiction and enforcementIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Any person who, without legal cause or good excuse, enters into the dwelling house, place of business, or on the premises of another person after having been warned not to do so or any person who, having entered into the dwelling house, place of business, or on the premises of another person without having been warned fails and refuses, without good cause or good excuse, to leave immediately upon being ordered or requested to do so by the person in possession or his agent or representative shall, on conviction, be fined not more than two hundred dollars or be imprisoned for not more than thirty days. All municipal courts of this State as well as those of magistrates may try and determine criminal cases involving violations of this section occurring within the respective limits of such municipalities and magisterial districts. All peace officers of the State and its subdivisions shall enforce the provisions hereof within their respective jurisdictions. The provisions of this section shall be construed as being in addition to, and not as superseding, any other statutes of the State relating to trespass or entry on lands of another.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Cross (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1994, 323 S.C. 41)“…premises of another after having been requested to leave. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-11-620 (1976). An indictment will sustain a…”
- Wright v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1994, 315 S.C. 521)“…Walker, 152 S.C. 88 , 149 S.E. 331 (1929); cf. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-11-620 (1985) (statute imposing criminal liab…”
- In the Interest of Joseph B. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1983, 278 S.C. 502)“…with trespassing upon the property of a public school under S. C. Code Ann. § 16-11-620 (Supp. 1981). He appeals, contending hi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits (2026), South Carolina Video Recording Laws: Where You Can and Cannot Record (2026), South Carolina Disorderly Conduct, Breach of Peace and Trespass Laws
§ 16-3-1700DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
As used in this article: (A) "Harassment in the first degree" means a pattern of intentional, substantial, and unreasonable intrusion into the private life of a targeted person that serves no legitimate purpose and causes the person and would cause a reasonable person in his position to suffer mental or emotional distress. Harassment in the first degree may include, but is not limited to: (1) following the targeted person as he moves from location to location; (2) visual or physical contact that is initiated, maintained, or repeated after a person has been provided oral or written notice that the contact is unwanted or after the victim has filed an incident report with a law enforcement agency; (3) surveillance of or the maintenance of a presence near the targeted person's: (a) residence; (b) place of work; (c) school; or (d) another place regularly occupied or visited by the targeted person; and (4) vandalism and property damage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):South Carolina courts have construed Section 16-3-1700's harassment and stalking definitions. State v. Brandenburg (2017) held first degree harassment is a lesser included offense of stalking. Emily Major v. James Major (2026) applied them in holding a magistrate court keeps jurisdiction over a stalking restraining order between spouses.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Brandenburg (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2017, 419 S.C. 346)✓Brandenburg followed and kept contacting his estranged wife despite a no contact order; the jury acquitted him of stalking but convicted him of first degree harassment, and the court held harassment under Section 16-3-1700(A) is a lesser included offense of stalking.
- Emily Major v. James Major (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2026)✓A wife sought a magistrate restraining order over daily unwanted gifts, letters and threatening emails from her estranged husband; applying the harassment and stalking definitions in Section 16-3-1700, the court held the magistrate keeps jurisdiction even between spouses.
- Washington v. State (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2023)“…f time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose." S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-1700(D) (2015). The solicitor stated Petiti…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), South Carolina Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 30: PUBLIC RECORDS
§ 30-4-10Short titleIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
This chapter shall be known and cited as the "Freedom of Information Act".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1996, 323 S.C. 384)“…e South Carolina Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), S.C. Code Ann. §§ 30-4-10 to -110 (1991 & Supp. 1994). Appellant…”
- Bellamy v. Brown (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1991, 305 S.C. 291)“…iality arising from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), S.C. Code Ann. § 30-4-10 — 110 (1991). We affirm. FACTS…”
- Weston v. Carolina Research & Development Foundation (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1991, 303 S.C. 398)“…Acting Associate Justices, concur. 1 S.C. Code Ann. § 30-4-10 to § 30-4-110 (Supp. 1989).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights (2026), South Carolina Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), South Carolina Freedom of Information Act: How to Request Public Records
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES § 17-30-10 (Interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications authorized)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17, Chapter 30 -- Wiretapping(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Freedom of Information Act(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. 16-11-620 -- Trespass After Notice or Refusal to Leave(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. 16-3-1700 -- Stalking(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- FAA Drone Regulations(faa.gov).gov
- SC Appellate Court Rules -- Rule 605(sccourts.org).gov