EnglishEspañol
North Carolina flag

North Carolina

Leyes de Protección al Denunciante en Carolina del Norte: Protecciones y Como Reportar

Por Equipo Editorial de Recording LawRevisado 20 de agosto de 202611 min de lectura
Leyes de Protección al Denunciante en Carolina del Norte: Protecciones y Como Reportar

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Tiene Carolina del Norte una ley de protección al denunciante para empleados del sector privado?

Sí. La Ley de Discriminación Laboral por Represalia (REDA), ubicada en N.C. Gen. Stat. 95-240 a 95-245, protege tanto a empleados del sector público como privado de represalias por reportar violaciones de leyes laborales específicas, incluyendo la Ley de Salario y Horario, la Ley de Seguridad y Salud Ocupacional y la Ley de Compensación Laboral.

¿Cuánto tiempo tengo para presentar una queja de represalia por denuncia en Carolina del Norte?

El plazo depende de la ley especifica. Las quejas de REDA deben presentarse dentro de 180 días ante el Departamento de Trabajo de Carolina del Norte. Las demandas de represalia contra empleados estatales deben presentarse ante el tribunal superior dentro de un año. Las demandas qui tam bajo la Ley de Reclamos Falsos deben presentarse dentro de seis años de la conducta fraudulenta.

¿Qué remedios están disponibles para los denunciantes de Carolina del Norte que enfrentan represalias?

Los remedios varían según el estatuto, pero generalmente incluyen reinstalación a su puesto anterior, salarios atrasados, restauración de beneficios adicionales y derechos de antiguedad, honorarios de abogado y costos de litigio. Bajo REDA, las violaciones intencionales pueden resultar en daños triplicados. Bajo la Ley de Reclamos Falsos, los empleados que sufren represalias pueden recibir el doble de sus salarios atrasados.

¿Puedo recibir una recompensa económica por denunciar fraude contra el estado de Carolina del Norte?

Sí. La Ley de Reclamos Falsos de Carolina del Norte permite a los denunciantes presentar demandas qui tam y recibir del 15% al 25% de la recuperación si el Fiscal General interviene, o del 25% al 30% si el denunciante procesa el caso de forma independiente. Esto se aplica principalmente al fraude de Medicaid y otros fraudes contra programas estatales.

¿Tengo que reportar la irregularidad a mi empleador antes de estar protegido bajo la ley de protección al denunciante de Carolina del Norte?

Depende del estatuto. Bajo la ley de protección de empleados estatales (N.C. Gen. Stat. 126-85), los empleados están protegidos por reportes hechos a supervisores, al Auditor Estatal o a organismos legislativos. REDA no exige reportar internamente primero. Para la Ley de Reclamos Falsos, presenta directamente ante el tribunal bajo sello.

Actualizaciones

Updated North Carolina's False Claims Act penalty figure: N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-607 indexes its base $5,500 to $11,000 civil penalty to the federal inflation-adjustment schedule, and the currently operative range under DOJ's 2025 adjustment is approximately $14,308 to $28,619 per false claim, not the static base figures the page previously stated.

Removed a fabricated sixth reportable category ("activities that violate the state constitution") from the G.S. 126-84 list of what state employees may report; the statute enumerates exactly five categories.

La ley detrás de este artículo

Este artículo se apoya en 8 disposiciones legales conservadas en nuestro propio registro jurídico, cada una obtenida de la fuente oficial. Toque una sección para leer el texto vigente.

North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 115C: Elementary and Secondary Education.

§ 115C-335.5Policies addressing harassment of school employees; protection against retaliation for reporting harassmentVigente
(a) Each local board of education may adopt a policy addressing the sexual harassment of local board employees by students, other local board employees, or school board members. The policy may, at a minimum, set out (i) the consequences of sexually harassing school employees and (ii) a procedure for reporting incidents of sexual harassment. (b) No local board of education or employee of a local board shall discharge, threaten, or otherwise retaliate against another employee of the board regarding that employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the employee files a written complaint alleging sexual harassment by students, other local board employees, or school board members, unless the employee reporting the harassment knew or should have known the report was false.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

Citada en 1 opiniones judicialesAplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2004

Casos destacados: Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2004, 165 N.C. App. 32)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 126: North Carolina Human Resources Act.

§ 126-84Statement of policyVigente
(a) It is the policy of this State that State employees shall have a duty to report verbally or in writing to their supervisor, department head, or other appropriate authority, evidence of activity by a State agency or State employee constituting any of the following: (1) A violation of State or federal law, rule or regulation. (2) Fraud. (3) Misappropriation of State resources. (4) Substantial and specific danger to the public health and safety. (5) Gross mismanagement, a gross waste of monies, or gross abuse of authority. (b) Further, it is the policy of this State that State employees be free of intimidation or harassment when reporting to public bodies about matters of public concern, including offering testimony to or testifying before appropriate legislative panels, or providing statements or testimony to agents and employees of legislative panels duly appointed by the President Pro Tempore and/or the Speaker of the House designated to conduct inquiries on behalf of such legislative panels.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

Citada en 44 opiniones judiciales1990s: 62000s: 162010s: 132020s: 9Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2024

Casos destacados: Newberne v. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2005, 359 N.C. 782) · Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2005, 359 N.C. 782) · Kennedy v. Guilford Technical Community College (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 1994, 115 N.C. App. 581)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 126-85Protection from retaliationVigente
(a) No head of any State department, agency, or institution or other State employee exercising supervisory authority shall discharge, threaten, or otherwise discriminate against a State employee regarding the State employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the State employee, or a person acting on behalf of the employee, reports or is about to report, verbally or in writing, any activity described in G.S. 126-84, unless the State employee knows or has reason to believe that the report is inaccurate. (a1) No State employee shall retaliate against another State employee because the employee, or a person acting on behalf of the employee, reports or is about to report, verbally or in writing, any activity described in G.S. 126-84.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

Citada en 27 opiniones judiciales1990s: 62000s: 142010s: 7Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2019

Casos destacados: Newberne v. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2005, 359 N.C. 782) · Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2005, 359 N.C. 782) · Swain v. Elfland (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2001, 145 N.C. App. 383)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 128: Offices and Public Officers.

§ 128-38.6Employee protection and remedies against unlawful retaliation for furnishing information to the Retirement Systems DivisionVigente
(a) In the absence of fraud or malice, no person who furnishes information to the staff of the Retirement Systems Division relating to the investigation of possible violations of retirement law shall be liable for damages in a civil action for any oral or written statement made or any other action that is necessary to supply such information to the Division. (b) Any employee of a participating local employer who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by the employee's employer because of lawful acts done by the employee in furtherance of the Retirement Systems Division's receipt of information concerning possible violations of retirement law, including cooperation with the Division's investigation of possible violations, shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 168A: Persons With Disabilities Protection Act.

§ 168A-10Retaliation prohibitedVigente
(a) No employer shall discharge, expel, refuse to hire, or otherwise discriminate against any person or applicant for employment, nor shall any employment agency discriminate against any person, nor shall a labor organization discriminate against any member or applicant for membership because the person has opposed any practice made a discriminatory practice by this Chapter or because the person has testified, assisted or participated in any manner in proceedings under this Chapter. (b) No entity or person covered under this Chapter shall retaliate against or coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with a person who exercises rights under this Chapter or assists a person in exercising the person's rights under this Chapter.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

Citada en 2 opiniones judicialesAplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2025

Casos destacados: Jarrell v. Town of Topsail Beach (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 1992, 105 N.C. App. 331) · RUMLEY v. CITY OF GRAHAM (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2025)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 95: Department of Labor and Labor Regulations.

§ 95-196Employee rightsVigente
No employer shall discharge, or cause to be discharged, or otherwise discipline or in any manner discriminate against an employee at the facility because the employee has assisted the Commissioner of Labor or his representative or the Fire Chief or his representative who may make or is making an inspection under G.S. 95-194(c) or G.S. 95-195(b), or has testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under this Article, or has used the provisions of G.S. 95-208.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

§ 95-241Discrimination prohibitedVigentecitada en 2 de nuestros artículos
(a) No person shall discriminate or take any retaliatory action against an employee because the employee in good faith does or threatens to do any of the following: (1) File a claim or complaint, initiate any inquiry, investigation, inspection, proceeding or other action, or testify or provide information to any person with respect to any of the following: a. Chapter 97 of the General Statutes. b. Article 2A or Article 16 of this Chapter. c. Article 2A of Chapter 74 of the General Statutes. d. G.S. 95-28.1. e. Article 16 of Chapter 127A of the General Statutes. f. G.S. 95-28.1A. g. Article 52 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes. h. Article 5F of Chapter 90 of the General Statutes. (2) Cause any of the activities listed in subdivision (1) of this subsection to be initiated on an employee's behalf. (3) Exercise any right on behalf of the employee or any other employee afforded by Article 2A or Article 16 of this Chapter, by Article 2A of Chapter 74 of the General Statutes, or by Article 52 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes. (4) Comply with the provisions of Article 27 of Chapter 7B of the General Statutes. (5) Exercise rights under Chapter 50B.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

Citada en 67 opiniones judiciales1990s: 72000s: 162010s: 222020s: 22Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Pierce v. Atlantic Group, Inc. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2012, 219 N.C. App. 19) · Wiley v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2004, 164 N.C. App. 183) · Fatta v. M & M Properties Management, Inc. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2012, 221 N.C. App. 369)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 96: Employment Security.

§ 96-15.1Protection of witnesses from discharge, demotion, or intimidationVigente
(a) No person may discharge, demote, or threaten any person because that person has testified or has been summoned to testify in any proceeding under the Employment Security Act. (b) Any person who violates the provisions of this section shall be liable in a civil action for reasonable damages suffered by any person as a result of the violation, and an employee discharged or demoted in violation of this section shall be entitled to be reinstated to his former position. The burden of proof shall be upon the party claiming a violation to prove a claim under this section. (c) The General Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction over actions under this section. (d) The statute of limitations for actions under this section shall be one year pursuant to G.S. 1-54.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-29 · Lea la sección completa en ncleg.gov

Citada en 3 opiniones judicialesAplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 1989

Casos destacados: Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co. (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1989, 325 N.C. 172) · Williams v. Hillhaven Corp. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 1988, 91 N.C. App. 35)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

Busque en nuestro registro completo de la ley de EE. UU.: 2.1 millones de secciones, todos los estados y la ley federal

Fuentes y referencias

  1. N.C. Gen. Stat. 95-241 - Ley de Discriminación Laboral por Represalia(ncleg.gov).gov
  2. N.C. Gen. Stat. 126-85 - Protección por Reportar Actividades Gubernamentales Indebidas(ncleg.gov).gov
  3. N.C. Gen. Stat. 126-84 - Declaración de Política sobre Protección al Denunciante(ncleg.gov).gov
  4. Ley de Reclamos Falsos de Carolina del Norte (N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-607 a 1-618)(ncleg.net).gov
  5. Departamento de Trabajo de Carolina del Norte - Oficina de Discriminación Laboral por Represalia(labor.nc.gov).gov
  6. N.C. Gen. Stat. 168A-10 - Ley de Protección de Personas con Discapacidades(ncleg.gov).gov
  7. N.C. Gen. Stat. 128-38.6 - Protecciones al Denunciante del Sistema de Jubilación(ncleg.gov).gov
  8. N.C. Gen. Stat. 95-196 - Protecciones sobre Sustancias Tóxicas o Peligrosas(ncleg.gov).gov
  9. N.C. Gen. Stat. 96-15.1 - Protecciones de la Ley de Seguridad del Empleo(ncleg.gov).gov
  10. N.C. Gen. Stat. 115C-335.5 - Acoso Sexual en Escuelas(ncleg.gov).gov
Compartir: