Kentucky
Kentucky Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 13 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kentucky's voyeurism statute, KRS 531.090, makes it a Class A misdemeanor to intentionally view, photograph, film, or record another person's intimate areas without their knowledge or consent in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, carrying penalties up to 12 months in jail and a $500 fine.
Kentucky law addresses voyeurism, hidden cameras, and nonconsensual image distribution through three main statutes: KRS 531.090 (voyeurism), KRS 531.100 (video voyeurism, when hidden-camera images are sold or distributed), and KRS 531.120 (nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit images). Together, these laws protect individuals from covert visual intrusions into their privacy and from the unauthorized sharing of intimate images.
This guide provides a thorough analysis of these statutes, their penalties, common scenarios where they apply, and how they interact with Kentucky's broader eavesdropping and recording laws.
Kentucky Voyeurism Statute: KRS 531.090
Elements of the Offense
Under KRS 531.090, a person commits voyeurism when they intentionally:

- Use a camera or recording device, the unaided eye or a visual-acuity device, or unlawfully enter or remain on another's premises, for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping
- A person's sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment that is not worn publicly visible, or the nipple of the female breast
- Without that person's consent
- When the other person is in a place where a reasonable person would believe those areas or that conduct will not be observed, viewed, photographed, filmed, or videotaped without their knowledge
All elements must be present for a voyeurism conviction. KRS 531.090 does not require proof that the defendant acted for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification. It requires only that the observing, viewing, or recording targeted the specific body parts or conduct the statute lists, without consent, in a place where the victim reasonably expected not to be observed.
What the Statute Protects
KRS 531.090 does not define or use the term "intimate areas." It specifically prohibits observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping a person's sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or the nipple of the female breast, without that person's consent, in a place where a reasonable person would believe those areas or that conduct will not be observed without their knowledge. The statute does not separately address the pubic area, buttocks, or a rule for sheer or see-through clothing; those terms are not part of its text.
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
The victim must have a reasonable expectation of privacy at the time of the offense. Places where this expectation is strongest include:
- Private residences (bedrooms, bathrooms)
- Restrooms in any building
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Dressing rooms in retail stores
- Hotel and motel rooms
- Medical examination rooms
- Tanning salons
The 2014 amendment added undergarments worn out of public view to the statute, aimed at upskirt photos. But the law still requires that the person be somewhere a reasonable person would expect those areas not to be seen or filmed without their knowledge, so whether it applies to a camera used in a public place, such as a park, depends on the facts. The statute does not cover cleavage as such, only an undergarment that is not publicly visible or the nipple of the female breast.
Penalty for Voyeurism
Voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is classified as a Class A misdemeanor in Kentucky.
| Penalty Component | Maximum |
|---|---|
| Jail time | Up to 12 months |
| Fine | Up to $500 |
Under KRS Chapter 533, a court may instead sentence a person to probation or conditional discharge.
Video Voyeurism (KRS 531.100)
A separate felony applies when hidden-camera images are shared. Under KRS 531.100, a person commits video voyeurism by intentionally using a camera or other recording device to film another person's sexual conduct, genitals, or female nipple without consent and then using or divulging the images for consideration, or distributing them by live or recorded visual medium, email, the Internet, or a commercial online service. Video voyeurism is a Class D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison. Unlike KRS 531.120, it does not require proof that the person intended to profit or to harm the victim.
Nonconsensual Distribution of Sexually Explicit Images: KRS 531.120

What the Statute Prohibits
KRS 531.120, enacted in 2018, makes it illegal to intentionally distribute or publish sexually explicit images of another person without that person's written consent. This statute is Kentucky's response to what is commonly called "revenge porn."
A person is guilty when:
- They intentionally distribute to any third party private erotic matter of the depicted person
- The depicted person did not give written consent to the distribution
- They act with the intent to profit, or to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the person depicted
- The disclosure would cause a reasonable person to suffer harm
Key Definitions
"Distribute" means to transfer possession of, whether with or without consideration (KRS 531.010).
"Private erotic matter" means an obscene visual image, including a photograph, film, video recording, computer-generated image, or digital reproduction, of an identifiable person, showing sexual conduct or the exposure of uncovered genitals, buttocks, or the nipple of the female breast. Since July 15, 2024, "computer-generated image" has covered any depiction created, adapted, or modified by a computer to appear to be an identifiable person, so AI-generated and digitally altered images are included.
"Written consent" is specifically required, and consent means agreement to send the images to a specific recipient or recipients. Agreeing to have a photo taken is not, by itself, consent to share it. The statute does not say what form the writing must take.
Penalty Structure
| Offense Level | Classification | Prison/Jail | Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| First offense | Class A misdemeanor | Up to 12 months in jail | Up to $500 |
| Second or subsequent offense | Class D felony | 1 to 5 years in prison | $1,000 to $10,000 |
| Distribution for profit, first offense | Class D felony | 1 to 5 years in prison | $1,000 to $10,000 |
| Distribution for profit, second or subsequent offense | Class C felony | 5 to 10 years in prison | $1,000 to $10,000 |
The escalation to a Class D felony for repeat offenses and first-offense profit-motivated distribution, rising to a Class C felony for a second or subsequent for-profit offense, reflects the severity with which Kentucky treats this conduct.
What Does Not Violate KRS 531.120
Beyond the written-consent requirement, the statute does not apply to:
- Images involving voluntary nudity or sexual conduct in public, in commercial settings, or in a place where a person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Disclosures made in the public interest, including reporting unlawful conduct, or the lawful and common practices of law enforcement, criminal reporting, corrections, legal proceedings, or medical treatment
- Disclosures of materials that are a matter of public concern
- Internet service providers, telecommunications services, or interactive computer services, for content provided solely by someone else
Websites, online services, and apps that distribute private erotic matter must remove an image when the person shown asks, and may not charge or accept a fee to do it. A conviction under KRS 531.120 does not require sex offender registration.
Hidden Camera Scenarios and Kentucky Law

Bathroom and Restroom Cameras
Installing a hidden camera in a bathroom, whether in a private home, a business, or a public facility, is one of the clearest voyeurism violations. Any person who places a recording device in a location designed to capture images of people using the restroom will face voyeurism charges under KRS 531.090.
If the captured images are sold, traded, or distributed, including by email or online, the person can be charged with video voyeurism under KRS 531.100, a Class D felony (1 to 5 years), and charges under KRS 531.120 may also apply where its intent and harm elements are met. If audio is also recorded, KRS 526.020 (eavesdropping, a Class D felony) could be charged as well.
Locker Room and Changing Area Cameras
Gyms, swimming pools, sports facilities, and retail stores with fitting rooms are frequent locations for hidden camera offenses. Kentucky law treats these spaces as areas with a high expectation of privacy.
Hidden Cameras in Bedrooms
Placing a hidden camera in someone's bedroom without their knowledge, including a partner's or spouse's bedroom, constitutes voyeurism if the recording captures that person's sexual conduct, genitals, a non-publicly-visible undergarment, or the nipple of the female breast without their consent, in circumstances where they reasonably expected not to be observed or recorded.
Workplace Hidden Cameras
An employer who installs hidden cameras in restrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas violates KRS 531.090. Cameras in regular work areas do not typically constitute voyeurism, but adding hidden cameras specifically aimed at capturing intimate areas of employees would violate the statute.
Short-Term Rental and Hotel Cameras
Hosts of Airbnb, VRBO, or similar short-term rental properties in Kentucky who install hidden cameras in bedrooms or bathrooms commit voyeurism. Kentucky law enforcement has investigated several such cases. Guests have a clear reasonable expectation of privacy in sleeping and bathing areas.
Relationship Between Voyeurism and Other Kentucky Laws

Voyeurism vs. Eavesdropping (KRS 526.020)
These are separate offenses that can overlap. Eavesdropping under KRS 526.020 covers the audio interception of communications without consent. Voyeurism under KRS 531.090 covers the visual recording of intimate areas without consent.
A hidden camera with audio capabilities that captures both video and sound in a private area could result in charges under both statutes. The eavesdropping charge is a Class D felony (1 to 5 years), while the voyeurism charge is a Class A misdemeanor (up to 12 months). Prosecutors often charge both when the evidence supports it.
Voyeurism vs. Stalking (KRS 508.130)
Repeated voyeuristic conduct directed at the same person could also constitute stalking under Kentucky law. Effective July 15, 2026, Kentucky consolidated its stalking offense into a single statute, KRS 508.130, which replaced the former two-degree structure; the old stalking-in-the-first-degree (KRS 508.140) and stalking-in-the-second-degree (KRS 508.150) sections are now repealed. Under current KRS 508.130, a person is guilty of stalking when they intentionally engage in a course of conduct directed at another person that seriously alarms, annoys, intimidates, or harasses that person, serves no legitimate purpose, and causes substantial mental distress. Stalking is a Class D felony, and it becomes a Class C felony where aggravating circumstances apply, including when the defendant's conduct places the victim in reasonable fear of sexual contact, physical injury, or death.
Voyeurism Involving Minors
When voyeurism targets a person under 18, additional statutes come into play. Creating sexually explicit images of a minor may constitute the production of child pornography under both Kentucky law (KRS 531.300 through 531.370) and federal law (18 U.S.C. 2251). These are serious felonies carrying substantial prison sentences.
The distribution of sexually explicit images of a minor is a separate federal offense under 18 U.S.C. 2252, with mandatory minimum sentences.
Civil Remedies for Voyeurism Victims
Tort Claims
Victims of voyeurism in Kentucky can pursue civil lawsuits against the perpetrator. KRS Chapter 526 provides no private civil cause of action (KRS 526.080 addresses forfeiture only), so plaintiffs rely on the federal wiretap civil remedy under 18 U.S.C. 2520 where a communication was intercepted, Kentucky's KRS 446.070, and Kentucky common-law torts. Available theories include:
- Federal ECPA civil remedy (18 U.S.C. 2520): Where a wire, oral, or electronic communication was intercepted (not silent video), a court may award the greater of actual damages plus the violator's profits or statutory damages of $100 a day or $10,000, whichever is greater, plus punitive damages and attorney fees
- Invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion): In McCall v. Courier-Journal, 623 S.W.2d 882 (Ky. 1981), the Kentucky Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Torts framework for invasion of privacy, which lists unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another as one way the right of privacy is invaded
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress: Voyeuristic conduct that causes severe emotional harm can support this claim
- Statutory damages claim (KRS 446.070): Kentucky law lets a person injured by the violation of any statute, such as KRS 531.090, 531.100, 531.120, or 526.020, sue the offender for the damages it caused
Potential Damages
Civil remedies available to voyeurism victims include:
- Actual damages for emotional distress, therapy costs, and other harm
- Punitive damages when the conduct was willful or malicious
- Injunctive relief ordering the destruction of images and prohibition of further distribution
- Attorney fees and court costs
Protective Orders
If the voyeurism is part of stalking, sexual assault, or dating violence, the victim can ask for an interpersonal protective order under KRS 456.060. A court can issue one only if it finds that dating violence and abuse, sexual assault, or stalking has occurred and may occur again, so a one-time voyeurism offense alone does not qualify. The order can bar contact and direct other steps the court believes will help.
Sex Offender Registration
A voyeurism conviction under KRS 531.090 involving an adult victim does not require sex offender registration in Kentucky. When the victim was under 18, Kentucky's registration law treats "any offense involving a minor or depictions of a minor" under KRS Chapter 531 as a criminal offense against a victim who is a minor, and an adult convicted of one is a registrant who must register (KRS 17.500).
That registration duty comes from KRS 17.500, not from police guidelines; registrants are listed on the Kentucky State Police sex offender registry. A conviction under KRS 531.120 is the exception: subsection (6) bars registration for that offense.
Reporting Voyeurism in Kentucky
If you discover a hidden camera or believe you are a victim of voyeurism:
- Do not touch or remove the device if possible. Leave it in place for law enforcement to document and collect as evidence.
- Contact local law enforcement immediately. You can call 911 for emergencies or the non-emergency police number for your jurisdiction.
- Document what you found by photographing the location and device from a distance.
- Preserve any evidence such as screenshots, messages, or links if images have been distributed.
- Contact the Kentucky Attorney General's Office if you need guidance on your rights or reporting options.
Federal TAKE IT DOWN Act and Kentucky AI Law
The TAKE IT DOWN Act, signed into law May 19, 2025, makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images without consent, including AI-generated fakes. Its platform requirement, obligating platforms to remove reported images within 48 hours of a valid notice, took effect one year later, on May 19, 2026. The Act does not create a right to sue; a separate federal law, 15 U.S.C. 6851, lets a person sue over the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. These federal laws supplement KRS 531.120 for image-based abuse.
Kentucky's own law already covers AI-generated intimate images. Since July 15, 2024, the "private erotic matter" that KRS 531.120 protects includes computer-generated or digitally altered images of an identifiable person (KRS 531.010), and since June 27, 2025, KRS 531.125 has made it a crime to threaten to distribute nude or sexual images of someone to coerce them. Kentucky's SB 4 (2025) (Acts Ch. 66, signed Mar. 24, 2025) separately created KRS 117.322, a civil action over AI-altered synthetic media of candidates in election communications. See our guide to state deepfake laws for more.
More Kentucky Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Kentucky Recording Laws
More Kentucky Recording Topics
More Kentucky Laws
- Kentucky AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Kentucky Dashcam Laws
- Kentucky Data Privacy Laws
- Kentucky Deepfake Laws
- Kentucky Employee Monitoring Laws
- Kentucky GPS Tracking Laws
- Kentucky Police Bodycam Laws
- Kentucky Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for voyeurism in Kentucky?
Voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 12 months in jail and fines up to $500. If hidden-camera images of someone's sexual conduct, genitals, or female breast are sold or distributed, the charge can be video voyeurism under KRS 531.100, a Class D felony (1 to 5 years), and KRS 531.120 may also apply.
Is it illegal to share intimate photos without consent in Kentucky?
Yes. KRS 531.120 makes it a crime to share private erotic matter of an identifiable person, including AI-generated images, without that person's written consent when done for profit or to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the person, and the disclosure would cause a reasonable person harm. A first offense is a Class A misdemeanor. A second or subsequent offense is a Class D felony punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison. Distribution for profit or gain is a Class D felony on the first offense, and a Class C felony punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison for a second or subsequent for-profit offense.
Are hidden cameras illegal in Kentucky?
Hidden cameras are illegal when used to view or record someone's intimate areas without their knowledge or consent in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This includes bathrooms, bedrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas. Hidden cameras in these locations constitute voyeurism under KRS 531.090.
Can I be charged with both voyeurism and eavesdropping in Kentucky?
Yes. If a hidden camera captures both video and audio, you could face voyeurism charges under KRS 531.090 (Class A misdemeanor) and eavesdropping charges under KRS 526.020 (Class D felony). The eavesdropping charge carries the more severe penalty of 1 to 5 years in prison.
Does verbal consent count for sharing intimate images in Kentucky?
No. KRS 531.120 requires the depicted person's written consent, and consent means agreement to send the images to a specific recipient or recipients; agreeing to have a photo taken is not, by itself, consent to share it. The statute does not say what form the writing must take. The crime also requires intent to profit or to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the person, and harm a reasonable person would suffer.
Updates
We fixed a sentence that referred to sentencing conditions the page never listed, and clarified that sex offender registration for minor-victim offenses comes from KRS 17.500, with KRS 531.120 convictions excluded by statute.
We corrected the elements, definitions and exceptions of Kentucky's nonconsensual image law (KRS 531.120), noted that it has covered AI-generated images since 2024, added the felony video voyeurism statute (KRS 531.100), and corrected the TAKE IT DOWN Act, federal wiretap damages, protective-order, sex offender registration and public-place voyeurism statements.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of McCall v. Courier-Journal to what the Kentucky Supreme Court actually held: it adopted the Restatement framework for invasion of privacy, including intrusion upon seclusion, but did not set out the elements of an intrusion claim.
Corrected the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date (May 19, 2025, not 2026 -- 2026 is when the platform takedown requirement took effect) and repointed three misrouted or invalid Kentucky statute citation links (the child-exploitation chapter, KRS 456.060, and KRS 117.322).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the election-deepfake citation from KRS 42.731 to KRS 117.322, and removed a misattribution of probation/conditional-discharge authority to KRS 532.090 (which sets only maximum jail terms).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the voyeurism elements and 'intimate areas' definition to match KRS 531.090's actual text (no sexual-arousal-or-gratification element; the statute protects sexual conduct, genitals, non-public undergarments, and the female nipple, not a fabricated pubic-area/buttocks/areola list), fixed the distribution-for-profit penalty table and FAQ (a second or subsequent for-profit offense is a Class C felony, 5-10 years, not Class D), and updated the stalking cross-reference to Kentucky's July 2026 consolidation of KRS 508.140/508.150 into a single KRS 508.130.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 531: PORNOGRAPHY
§ 531.090VoyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of voyeurism when: (a) He or she intentionally: 1. Uses or causes the use of any camera, videotape, photooptical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; or 2. Uses the unaided eye or any device designed to improve visual acuity for the purpose of observing or viewing the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; or 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kentucky courts have treated KRS 531.090 largely as a jury-instruction question. Williams v. Commonwealth (2005) held the 2002 voyeurism statute could not reach conduct predating its July 15, 2002 effective date, and Morgan v. Commonwealth (2006) held voyeurism is not a lesser-included offense of first-degree burglary.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2005, 178 S.W.3d 491)✓Williams photographed his eight-year-old stepdaughter naked in January 2001 and sought a lesser-included voyeurism instruction; the court held KRS 531.090 created a new offense effective July 15, 2002 and was not retroactive, so it could not reach his earlier conduct.
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)✓Morgan watched a couple through a trailer window, then cut the phone line and broke in armed; the court held voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is not a lesser-included offense of first-degree burglary because it requires proof of unlawful entry to view another person.
- Commonwealth v. Mixon (Kentucky Supreme Court 1992, 827 S.W.2d 689)“…lier cases, arising under the former habitual criminal act, KRS 531.090, required authenticated records of fore…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Kentucky Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Disputes
§ 531.120Distribution of sexually explicit images without consentIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of distribution of sexually explicit images without consent when: (a) He or she intentionally distributes to any third party private erotic matter without the written consent of the person depicted, and does so with the intent to profit, or to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the person depicted; and (b) The disclosure would cause a reasonable person to suffer harm. (2) This section shall not apply to: (a) Images involving voluntary nudity or sexual conduct in public, commercial settings, or in a place where a person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy; (b) Disclosures made in the public interest, including the reporting of unlawful conduct, or lawful and common practices of law enforcement, criminal reporting, corrections, legal proceedings, or medical treatment; (c) Disclosures of materials that constitute a matter of public concern; or (d) Internet service providers or telecommunications services, or interactive computer services, as defined in 47 U.S.C. sec. 230(f)(2), for content solely provided by another person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Also relied on in: Deepfake & AI Voice Cloning Laws by State (2026), Kentucky Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Kentucky Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
§ 531.300Definitions for KRS 531.080 and 531.300 to 531.370In forcecited in 4 of our articles
As used in KRS 531.080 and 531.300 to 531.370: (1) "Obscene" means the predominate appeal of the matter taken as a whole is to a prurient interest in sexual conduct involving minors; (2) "Performance" means any play, motion picture, photograph, dance, or any other visual representation or computer-generated image exhibited before an audience; (3) "Promote" means to prepare, publish, print, procure, or manufacture, or to offer or agree to do the same; (4) "Sexual conduct by a minor" means: (a) Acts of masturbation, homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse, actual or simulated; (b) Physical contact with, or willful or intentional exhibition of the genitals; (c) Flagellation or excretion for the purpose of sexual stimulation or gratification; or (d) The exposure, in an obscene manner, of the unclothed or apparently unclothed human male or female genitals, pubic area or buttocks, or the female breast, whether or not subsequently obscured by a mark placed thereon, or otherwise altered, in any resulting motion picture, photograph, computer-generated image, or other visual representation, exclusive of exposure portrayed in matter of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 29 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Payne v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1981, 623 S.W.2d 867)“…310), as interpreted through its definitional counterpart (KRS 531.300), violates the First and Fourteenth Ame…”
- Purcell v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 149 S.W.3d 382)“…ionary review. Appellant asserts (1) that subsection (b) of KRS 531.300(4) (definition of "sexual conduct by a…”
- Clark v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2008, 267 S.W.3d 668)“…In Woodard v. Commonwealth, we recognized that KRS 531.300(5) defined performance (within the cont…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 117: REGULATION OF ELECTIONS
§ 117.322Action against use of synthetic media in electioneering communication -- Remedies -- Penalties -- Defense -- ExceptionsIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(1) (a) Any candidate for any elected office whose appearance, action, or speech is altered through the use of synthetic media in an electioneering communication may seek injunctive or other equitable relief against the sponsor of the electioneering communication requiring that the communication includes a disclosure that is clear and conspicuous and included in, or alongside and associated with, the content in a manner that is likely to be noticed by the user. (b) The court may award a prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs. This paragraph does not limit or preclude a plaintiff from securing or recovering any other available remedy. (2) In any action brought under subsection (1) of this section: (a) The plaintiff shall: 1. File in Circuit Court of the county in which he or she resides; and 2. Bear the burden of establishing the use of synthetic media by clear and convincing evidence; and (b) The following shall not be liable except as provided in subsection (3) of this section: 1. The medium disseminating the electioneering communication; and 2. An advertising sales representative of such medium.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-09 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Also relied on in: Kentucky Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules, Kentucky Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Legal Limits, Kentucky AI Laws: What's Enacted and What's Next (2027)
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 456: CIVIL ORDERS OF PROTECTION
§ 456.060Ruling on petition for interpersonal protective order -- Duration of orderIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Following a hearing ordered under KRS 456.040, if a court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that dating violence and abuse, sexual assault, or stalking has occurred and may again occur, the court may issue an interpersonal protective order: (a) Restraining the adverse party from: 1. Committing further acts of dating violence and abuse, stalking, or sexual assault; 2. Any unauthorized contact or communication with the petitioner or other person specified by the court; 3. Approaching the petitioner or other person specified by the court within a distance specified in the order, not to exceed five hundred (500) feet; 4. Going to or within a specified distance of a specifically described residence, school, or place of employment or area where such a place is located; and 5. Disposing of or damaging any of the property of the parties; (b) Authorizing, at the request of the petitioner: 1. Limited contact or communication between the parties that the court finds necessary; or 2. The parties to remain in a common area, which may necessitate them being closer than five hundred (500) feet under limited circumstances with specific parameters set forth by the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Halloway v. Simmons (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 532 S.W.3d 158)“…ur, the court may issue an interpersonal protective order.” KRS 456.060(1). Under KRS 456.010(7), “ ‘[sjtalking…”
- Calhoun v. Wood (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 516 S.W.3d 357)“…ry to restrain Calhoun from further acts of stalking. See KRS 456.060(1). Based on our analysis of the proc…”
- Benson v. Lively (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2018, 544 S.W.3d 159)“…However, similar to the DVO statute, the IPO statute, KRS 456.060, does allow a trial court to direct or…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 508: ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 508.130StalkingIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) As used in this section, unless the context requires otherwise: (a) 1. "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of two (2) or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose. 2. One (1) or more of these acts may include: a. Those by which a person, directly or indirectly, by any means or method: i. Follows, monitors, observes, surveils, or threatens another person; or ii. Interferes with another person's property; or b. The use of any equipment, instrument, machine, or other device by which communication or information is transmitted, including but not limited to: i. Computers; ii. The internet, internet applications, social media platforms, email, text messages, instant messages, or any other electronic network; iii. Cameras or other recording devices; iv. Telephones or other personal communications devices; v. Scanners or other copying devices; and vi. Any device that enables the use of a transmitting device. 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)“…Physical injury; or 3. Death. "Stalking" is defined in KRS 508.130(1) as follows: (a) To "stalk" means t…”
- Halloway v. Simmons (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 532 S.W.3d 158)“…sical injury; or 3. Death There, stalking is defined in KRS 508.130 as meaning, (1) (a) To engage in an i…”
- Calhoun v. Wood (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 516 S.W.3d 357)“…(2) or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose .... KRS 508.130. In the circuit court, Wood alleged t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions, Kentucky GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Kentucky Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 508.140Repealed, 2026.Repealedcited in 2 of our articles
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Calhoun v. Wood (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 516 S.W.3d 357)“…[sjtalking’ refers to conduct prohibited as stalking under KRS 508.140 or [KRS] 508.150.” KRS 456.010(7). Thos…”
- Monhollen v. Commonwealth (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1997, 947 S.W.2d 61)“…to an overbreadth challenge”). The stalking statute, KRS 508.140, provides: (1) A person is guilt…”
- Halloway v. Simmons (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 532 S.W.3d 158)“…[sjtalking’ refers to conduct prohibited as stalking under KRS 508.140 or 508.150.” Stalking in the second deg…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 508.150Repealed, 2026.Repealedcited in 2 of our articles
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 32 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Calhoun v. Wood (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 516 S.W.3d 357)“…ined in KRS 510.010; 2. Physical injury; or 3. Death. KRS 508.150(1). The term “stalk” as used in this st…”
- Duncan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2010, 322 S.W.3d 81)“…nd of two counts of second-degree stalking, in violation of KRS 508.150. In accord with the jury’s status deter…”
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)“…failed to prove the elements of the offense as set forth in KRS 508.150, which provides: (1) A person is guil…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 526: EAVESDROPPING AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 526.020EavesdroppingIn forcecited in 20 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of eavesdropping when he intentionally uses any device to eavesdrop, whether or not he is present at the time. (2) Eavesdropping is a Class D felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Basham v. Commonwealth (1984) held wiretap evidence obtained under a valid federal order is admissible in Kentucky, though it noted no state law authorizes electronic surveillance by Kentucky police. Brock v. Commonwealth (1997) held the exclusionary rule reaches only constitutional violations, so a private recording was not suppressed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Springer v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1999, 998 S.W.2d 439)✓A neighbor used a police scanner to tape cordless calls from the victim's home, and detectives played it to induce Eades to confess; the court held the federal wiretap act and Kentucky's eavesdropping statutes did not bar using it against someone who was not a party to the calls.
- Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 151 S.W.3d 781)✓Wal-Mart secretly ran about forty hours of audio and video surveillance of employees in a store claims area; the court did not decide whether that violated KRS 526.020, holding instead that the employees' statutory claim failed for lack of damages caused by the recording itself.
- Brock v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1997, 947 S.W.2d 24)✓Brock, claiming self-defense, was kept from using a private tape of the victim's mother saying her son had gone to kill him; the court held that even assuming the tape violated KRS 526.020, the exclusionary rule reaches only state action, so suppression was not required.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Kentucky Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and Healthcare Privacy, Kentucky Phone Call Recording Laws: What You Need to Know
§ 526.080ForfeitureIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
Any electronic, mechanical or other device designed or commonly used for eavesdropping which is possessed or used in violation of this chapter, is forfeited to the state and shall be disposed of in accordance with KRS 500.090.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Also relied on in: Kentucky Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, Kentucky AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 2251Sexual exploitation of childrenIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
Any person who employs, uses, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any minor to engage in, or who has a minor assist any other person to engage in, or who transports any minor in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, with the intent that such minor engage in, any sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct, shall be punished as provided under subsection (e), if such person knows or has reason to know that such visual depiction will be transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed, if that visual depiction was produced or transmitted using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or if such visual depiction has actually been transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,812 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Irey (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2010, 612 F.3d 1160)“…iled on December 13, 2006, Irey was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (c). The indictment alleged that he “di…”
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 535 U.S. 234)“…ether the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), 18 U. S. C. § 2251 et seq., abridges the freedom of sp…”
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…But as in the criminalization of pornography production at 18 U. S. C. § 2251 , see infra, at 76, n. 5, the perpetr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026), Kansas Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Federal Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
§ 2252Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minorsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
Any person who— knowingly transports or ships using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means including by computer or mails, any visual depiction, if— the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and such visual depiction is of such conduct; knowingly receives, or distributes, any visual depiction using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or that has been mailed, or has been shipped or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or which contains materials which have been mailed or so shipped or transported, by any means including by computer, or knowingly reproduces any visual depiction for distribution using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or through the mails, if— the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and such visual depiction is of such conduct; either— in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or on any land or building owned by,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,732 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- New York v. Ferber (Supreme Court of the United States 1982, 458 U.S. 747)“…o prohibits dissemination only if the material is obscene. 18 U. S. C. § 2252 (a) (1976 ed., Supp. IV). Two States pr…”
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. 18 U. S. C. § 2252 . The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci…”
- Osborne v. Ohio (Supreme Court of the United States 1990, 495 U.S. 103)“…rial for the purpose of sale or distribution for sale. See 18 U. S. C. § 2252 (a) (1982 ed.). But Congress did not…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: xAI Sues Grok User Over Alleged AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material, Alabama Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Victim Rights, Nevada Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: NRS 200.604 Penalties (2026)
§ 2520Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 130 of our articles
Except as provided in section 2511(2)(a)(ii), any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate. In an action under this section, appropriate relief includes— such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; damages under subsection (c) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and a reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 860 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walker v. Darby (1990) held a 2520 plaintiff need not prove the contents of intercepted conversations, only interception and a justified expectation against it. Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) barred 2520 damages against defendants who took no part in the interception, obtained the tape lawfully, and disclosed a matter of public concern.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth Day (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1990, 911 F.2d 1573)✓A postal letter carrier said three supervisors wired an intercom near his workstation to listen in. Reversing summary judgment, the Eleventh Circuit held a section 2520 plaintiff can show interception without proving the contents of specific conversations.
- Gelbard v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 408 U.S. 41)“…disclosure, or use is entitled to recover civil damages, 18 U. S. C. § 2520 . Title III also bars the use as eviden…”
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 503 F.3d 847)“…7 U.S.C. § 605 (e)(4), or alternatively, for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (a), or alternatively, for violations o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?, Federal Wiretap Act and ECPA: The Complete Guide (2026)
Sources and References
- KRS 531.090 - Voyeurism(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 531.120 - Nonconsensual Distribution of Sexually Explicit Images(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 526.020 - Eavesdropping(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 508.130 - Stalking (consolidated statute, eff. July 15, 2026)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 456.060 - Interpersonal Protective Orders(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- Kentucky Attorney General(ag.ky.gov).gov
- Kentucky State Police Sex Offender Registry(kspsor.state.ky.us).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2251 - Sexual Exploitation of Children(law.cornell.edu)
- KRS Chapter 531 - Pornography (Child Exploitation Sections 531.300-531.370)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 117.322 - Synthetic Media in Elections(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 531.100 - Video Voyeurism(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 531.010 - Definitions (private erotic matter, computer-generated image)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 17.500 - Sex Offender Registration Definitions(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 446.070 - Penalty No Bar to Civil Recovery(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. 6851 - Civil Action Relating to Disclosure of Intimate Images(law.cornell.edu)