EnglishEspañol
Kentucky flag

Kentucky

Kentucky Laws on Recording Police: Your First Amendment Rights

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kentucky Laws on Recording Police: Your First Amendment Rights

Updates

We stated that the right to record police is unsettled in the Sixth Circuit rather than one Kentucky residents generally have, and removed the implication that a warrant alone can compel you to unlock your phone.

Corrected statements that presented a First Amendment right to record police, and limits on officers, as settled Kentucky law; clarified that one-party consent covers your own encounter, not a bystander recording others; corrected the phone-seizure rule under Riley v. California; removed a misquoted 2012 Justice Department letter and linked the actual letter; and corrected the federal damages formula, the obstruction statute's elements, the circuit list, the no-knock body camera mandate, and the open-meetings recording rule.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Added Kentucky's 2026 impeding-a-first-responder law (SB 104, Acts ch. 96), in effect since July 15, 2026, which sets a 25-foot line after a verbal warning.

Corrected the description of Crawford v. Geiger (6th Cir. 2016), which did not decide whether there is a right to record police; the appeal addressed only excessive force, seizure, and false arrest claims.

Corrected an overstated claim that the Sixth Circuit has settled precedent recognizing the right to record police (it has no published ruling on the question), and repointed three misrouted Kentucky statute links (KRS 519.020, KRS 61.878, KRS 61.168) to their correct pages.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Corrected the source of the written-request/five-business-day procedure: it belongs to the general Open Records Act (KRS 61.870-61.884), not to the body-camera-specific KRS 61.168.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. KRS 526.020 - Eavesdropping(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  2. KRS 519.020 - Obstructing Governmental Operations(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  3. KRS Chapter 61 - Open Records and Open Meetings(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  4. KRS 61.878 - Open Records Exemptions(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  5. DOJ letter in Sharp v. Baltimore City Police Dep't (May 14, 2012)(justice.gov).gov
  6. Kentucky Attorney General(ag.ky.gov).gov
  7. 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights(law.cornell.edu)
  8. Bureau of Justice Assistance - Body-Worn Camera Program(bja.ojp.gov).gov
  9. KRS 61.168 - Body-Worn Camera Footage Disclosure(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  10. 2026 Ky. Acts ch. 96 (SB 104) - Impeding a first responder(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  11. KRS 455.200 (No-knock warrant execution; body-worn camera requirement)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
  12. KRS 61.840 (Open meetings: conditions for attendance)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
Share: