Kentucky
Kentucky Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 13 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Ordinary filming of what is openly visible from streets, parks, and other public places is legal in Kentucky, and no state law requires a permit for it. The main exceptions: secretly filming under or through someone's clothing is a crime (voyeurism, KRS 531.090), and Kentucky law bars using a drone to surveil people on private property (KRS 500.130(12)), which lets the owner or occupant sue (KRS 411.067). Audio recording follows one-party consent under KRS 526.020, so you may record any conversation you participate in. Private property owners may still limit recording on their premises.
Recording in public places in Kentucky is broadly lawful: no state statute bans ordinary public filming, and many federal appeals courts have recognized First Amendment protection for it. You can photograph, film, and record video in parks, on streets, at public events, and in the public areas of most government buildings without a permit. Audio recording adds complexity because Kentucky's eavesdropping laws under KRS 526.020 apply when you record a conversation between other people without the consent of at least one of them.
This guide covers your rights to record in public, the distinctions between public and private spaces, audio recording considerations, government meeting recording rights, and the most common situations where public recording questions arise.
Your Right to Record in Public
Constitutional Foundation
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech and the press, which courts have interpreted to include the right to gather information through recording in public spaces. Federal appeals courts across the country have recognized that photographing and filming in public is protected expression.

The First Amendment right to record in public rests on general free speech and free press principles and has been recognized in published decisions by several federal appeals courts, including the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits, and the Fourth Circuit has held that livestreaming a police traffic stop is protected speech. The Sixth Circuit, which has jurisdiction over Kentucky, has not issued a published decision squarely establishing this right. The Sixth Circuit case most often mentioned, Crawford v. Geiger, 656 F. App'x 190 (6th Cir. 2016), is unpublished and did not decide the question: the plaintiffs there alleged officers stopped them from recording, but the district court had granted summary judgment on the First Amendment claims and the appeal addressed only Fourth Amendment qualified immunity issues, so Kentucky residents rely on this persuasive authority from other circuits rather than a settled Sixth Circuit ruling.
No Permit Required
Kentucky does not require permits for personal photography or filming in public spaces. You can freely record:
- On public sidewalks, streets, and intersections
- In public parks, plazas, and green spaces
- At public monuments, memorials, and landmarks
- On public transportation platforms and stops
- At public beaches, lakes, and recreation areas along public land
- During public events, festivals, and parades
Commercial filming may require permits in certain jurisdictions. Louisville, Lexington, and other Kentucky cities have film commission offices that coordinate permits for professional productions that use public infrastructure, require road closures, or involve large crews.
Video vs. Audio Recording in Public

Video-Only Recording
Video recording without audio in public spaces is lightly regulated in Kentucky. Ordinary filming of what is openly visible from a public space is lawful, with two exceptions: secretly filming under or through someone's clothing, which can be the crime of voyeurism under KRS 531.090 when the person reasonably expects those areas not to be seen, and using a drone to surveil people on private property, which KRS 500.130(12) prohibits and KRS 411.067 makes grounds for a lawsuit (discussed below). Lawful public filming includes:
- Filming buildings, architecture, and landmarks
- Recording street scenes and public events
- Photographing people in public places
- Filming traffic, weather, and natural events
- Livestreaming public activities
Audio Recording and the Eavesdropping Law
When your recording captures audio, KRS 526.020 becomes relevant. The law makes it a felony to record a "wire or oral communication of others" without the consent of at least one party (KRS 526.010). Kentucky's statute does not define "oral communication" or expressly limit itself to private conversations.
Audio recording is generally treated as lawful when:
- You are recording your own conversations with others (one-party consent)
- You are recording public speeches, announcements, or performances
- You are recording ambient noise without targeting specific conversations between others
Audio recording may be problematic when:
- You use a directional microphone to capture a private conversation between two people who are speaking quietly
- You deliberately position recording equipment to intercept communications you are not part of
- The speakers have taken steps to keep their conversation private despite being in a public area
In practice, standard video recording in public with ambient audio capture rarely triggers legal issues. The risk arises when someone deliberately records a particular conversation between other people that they are not part of, which can carry risk even in a public place.
Recording Government Activity

Open Meetings Act (KRS 61.805-61.850)
Kentucky's Open Meetings Act is one of the strongest government transparency laws in the country. It requires that all meetings of public agencies be open to the public, with limited exceptions for closed sessions.
The Act's express recording guarantee is for the press: all agencies "shall permit news media coverage, including but not limited to recording and broadcasting" (KRS 61.840). For other members of the public, the Act allows no attendance condition beyond what is needed to keep order, but it does not separately address recording by non-media attendees, so an agency may act against recording that disrupts a meeting. Open meetings include:
- City council meetings
- County fiscal court meetings
- School board meetings
- Meetings of standing committees of the General Assembly (other legislative committees are exempt under KRS 61.810(1)(i))
- Planning and zoning commission meetings
- Public utility commission hearings
- University board of trustees meetings
- Any meeting of a body created by state or local law that exercises governmental authority
Recording in Government Buildings
You can generally record in the public areas of government buildings, including:
- State Capitol building in Frankfort
- County courthouses (public areas, not courtrooms without permission)
- City hall buildings
- Public libraries
- Department of Motor Vehicle offices
- Public schools (with certain restrictions)
Individual government buildings may have posted rules about recording. Security-sensitive areas within government buildings may restrict recording. Federal buildings have their own regulations. Post offices are an example: federal postal rules allow photography for news purposes in entrances, lobbies, foyers, and corridors, but other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local postmaster or installation head (39 CFR 232.1(i)).
Courtroom Recording
Recording inside Kentucky courtrooms requires the court's permission. Camera and electronic media coverage of court proceedings is governed by rules of the Kentucky Supreme Court, which the Kentucky Court of Justice links from its rules page, and by the presiding judge's orders. Check both before bringing a camera. In general:
- Judges have discretion to allow or prohibit recording in their courtrooms
- Requests to record must typically be made in advance
- Certain proceedings (juvenile cases, family court matters) may have additional restrictions
- Recording that disrupts proceedings can be prohibited
Recording in Quasi-Public Spaces

Private Property Open to the Public
Businesses and private establishments that are open to the public have the right to restrict recording on their premises. This includes:
- Retail stores and shopping malls
- Restaurants and bars
- Movie theaters and entertainment venues
- Gyms and fitness centers
- Hospitals and medical facilities
- Churches and religious institutions
- Museums and galleries
If you are asked to stop recording on private property and refuse, you can be asked to leave. Remaining after being told to leave can be criminal trespass. Knowingly remaining unlawfully on any premises is third-degree trespass under KRS 511.080, a violation (a Class B misdemeanor for a repeat offense within three years or, in the disaster area, during a declared emergency). Second-degree trespass under KRS 511.070, a Class B misdemeanor (a Class A misdemeanor for a repeat offense within three years or during a declared emergency), covers remaining "in a building or upon premises as to which notice against trespass is given by fencing or other enclosure."
Recording at Public Events on Private Property
Events held on private property that are open to the public (concerts, sporting events, festivals) may have their own recording policies. Event organizers can:
- Prohibit recording as a condition of entry (printed on tickets or posted at entrances)
- Restrict certain types of recording equipment (professional cameras, tripods)
- Allow personal phone recording but prohibit commercial filming
- Eject attendees who violate recording policies
Street Photography and Kentucky Law
Your Rights as a Photographer
Kentucky has no law restricting ordinary street photography. You can photograph or film people in public spaces without their permission. There is no right to privacy in public activities conducted in view of others.
What Is Not Protected
While public photography is broadly legal, certain uses of photographs can create legal issues:
- Commercial use without consent: Using someone's likeness for commercial purposes (advertising, product promotion) without their consent may violate Kentucky's right of publicity doctrine
- Harassment through photography: If photography is part of a pattern of behavior that constitutes stalking under KRS 508.130, it could result in criminal charges
- Photographing minors: While legally permitted in public, photographing children in ways that could be construed as targeting them for inappropriate purposes may draw law enforcement attention
Recording Protests and Public Demonstrations
Legal Protections
Recording protests, marches, rallies, and other public demonstrations from a public place is not a crime under Kentucky law, and many federal appeals courts have held that the First Amendment protects recording police in public, although the Sixth Circuit, which covers Kentucky, has not decided the question. The same applies to:
- Protesters recording their own activities
- Journalists covering the event
- Bystanders documenting what they observe
- Livestreamers broadcasting in real time
Police Interaction During Protests
Because the Sixth Circuit has not recognized a First Amendment right to record police, no binding federal ruling in Kentucky spells out what officers may not do to someone recording a protest. Courts in other circuits have held that arresting or obstructing someone solely for recording police in public violates the First Amendment (for example, Glik v. Cunniffe in the First Circuit and Irizarry v. Yehia in the Tenth Circuit).
Under Riley v. California (2014), police generally need a warrant to search the contents of your phone, although they may hold the phone while they get one.
Police can issue lawful orders to move for safety or to clear a roadway. If given a lawful order to relocate, comply with the order but continue recording from the new position.
Recording at Schools and Universities
Public Schools
Kentucky public schools are government property, and the general right to record in public spaces applies with modifications:
- Parents can generally record school events (plays, concerts, sporting events) unless the school has a specific restriction
- School administrators can restrict recording during instructional time to prevent disruption
- Schools commonly bar recording in locker rooms and restrooms, and filming someone undressed there without consent is voyeurism under KRS 531.090
- Kentucky law requires every school district to ban student phone use during instructional time unless a teacher authorizes it, there is an emergency, or the device is a disability accommodation (KRS 158.165)
- FERPA governs the records a school keeps, not a parent's own recording, though schools often limit sharing images of other students
Public Universities
Kentucky's public universities (University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, Western Kentucky University, etc.) are generally open to recording in outdoor areas and publicly accessible buildings. Individual departments, classrooms, and facilities may have specific recording policies.
Drone Recording in Kentucky
FAA Regulations
Drone flight in Kentucky is governed mainly by federal Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations, and Kentucky law adds a drone privacy rule (below). Key FAA requirements include:
- Recreational drones must be registered with the FAA if they weigh more than 0.55 pounds
- Commercial drone operators must hold a Remote Pilot Certificate
- Drones must fly below 400 feet in uncontrolled airspace
- Operators must maintain visual line of sight
- Flights over people are allowed only within the FAA's operations-over-people rules (14 CFR part 107, subpart D) or with a waiver
- Drones cannot fly near airports, stadiums, or other restricted airspace without authorization
State and Local Drone Restrictions
Kentucky's main state drone privacy rule is KRS 500.130(12), as amended effective June 27, 2025. A person flying a drone for business, recreation, or education may not use it to record images of privately owned property, or of the people on it, with the intent to surveil them or publish unauthorized images in violation of their reasonable expectation of privacy. People on their own property are presumed to have that expectation if they cannot be seen by someone at ground level standing where they have a legal right to be, even if they can be seen from the air.
Under KRS 411.067, the owner or occupant can sue for an injunction, actual and punitive damages, court costs, and attorney's fees, and KRS 413.2475 allows seven years to file.
A Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources regulation, 301 KAR 3:140 (effective October 16, 2025), makes it unlawful to use an aircraft or unmanned aircraft system to fish, hunt, or take wildlife, or to harass wildlife. Local ordinances in some Kentucky cities may impose additional restrictions on drone use, particularly in parks and near public events.
Privacy Concerns With Drone Recording
A drone equipped with a camera that captures footage of people in areas where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy (fenced backyards, through windows) could potentially trigger voyeurism charges under KRS 531.090, a lawsuit under the drone privacy rule above, or other privacy claims.
More Kentucky Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Kentucky Recording Laws
More Kentucky Recording Topics
More Kentucky Laws
- Kentucky AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Kentucky Dashcam Laws
- Kentucky Data Privacy Laws
- Kentucky Deepfake Laws
- Kentucky Employee Monitoring Laws
- Kentucky GPS Tracking Laws
- Kentucky Police Bodycam Laws
- Kentucky Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to record video in public in Kentucky?
Generally, yes. Kentucky has no law against ordinary filming of what is openly visible in public spaces, apart from secretly filming under someone's clothing (voyeurism, KRS 531.090) and drone surveillance of private property (KRS 500.130(12)). You can film on public streets, parks, sidewalks, and anywhere you have a legal right to be. Audio recording is also permitted when you are a participant in the conversation under one-party consent (KRS 526.020).
Do I need a permit to film in public in Kentucky?
No permit is required for personal photography or filming in public spaces. Commercial film productions that require road closures, use of public infrastructure, or large crews may need permits from local film commissions in cities like Louisville or Lexington.
Can I record a government meeting in Kentucky?
Yes. Kentucky's Open Meetings Act (KRS 61.805-61.850) requires most government meetings to be open to the public, allows no attendance condition other than those needed to keep order, and expressly requires agencies to permit news media recording and broadcasting (KRS 61.840). The Act does not separately address recording by other attendees, so expect an agency to stop recording that disrupts the meeting. Open meetings include city council meetings, school board meetings, county fiscal court meetings, and meetings of standing legislative committees.
Can a store owner tell me to stop recording in their business?
Yes. Private property owners, including businesses open to the public, can restrict recording on their premises. If you are asked to stop recording and refuse, you can be asked to leave. Remaining after being told to leave may result in trespassing charges.
Can I fly a drone to record video in Kentucky?
Yes, subject to FAA regulations and Kentucky's drone privacy law. Recreational drones over 0.55 pounds must be registered. Commercial operators need a Remote Pilot Certificate. Drones must fly below 400 feet and maintain visual line of sight. Kentucky law bars using a drone to record people or private property with the intent to surveil them or publish unauthorized images in violation of their reasonable expectation of privacy (KRS 500.130(12)), and the owner or occupant can sue for damages and attorney's fees (KRS 411.067).
Updates
We added the declared-emergency tier to the description of third-degree criminal trespass under KRS 511.080.
We corrected how this page describes the federal right to record police in Kentucky (the Sixth Circuit has not recognized it), added Kentucky's 2025 drone privacy law, narrowed the Open Meetings Act recording guarantee to what KRS 61.840 says, and fixed the post office, trespass, phone-seizure, school phone-ban and drone-over-people statements. Clarified that drone surveillance of private property under KRS 500.130(12) is enforced by a civil lawsuit under KRS 411.067, not as a crime, and added that second-degree trespass becomes a Class A misdemeanor for a repeat offense within three years or during a declared emergency.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of Crawford v. Geiger: the Sixth Circuit appeal addressed only Fourth Amendment qualified immunity issues and did not rule on the right to record.
Corrected a blocking overclaim that the Sixth Circuit has upheld a well-established right to record in public (it has no published ruling on the question) and repointed the KRS 511.070 trespass citation to its correct page.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Repointed the stalking-by-photography citation to KRS 508.130 (508.150 was repealed and recodified effective July 15, 2026) and corrected the drone-hunting citation from KRS 500.120 (an unrelated AG subpoena-power statute) to the actual Kentucky Fish and Wildlife regulation, 301 KAR 3:140.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected a wrong-section citation: KRS 511.060 (criminal trespass in the first degree) applies to unlawfully entering or remaining in a dwelling, not a business premises; the business-premises trespass scenario is covered by KRS 511.070 (second degree), which now stands alone in the text and Sources list.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 526: EAVESDROPPING AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 526.020EavesdroppingIn forcecited in 20 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of eavesdropping when he intentionally uses any device to eavesdrop, whether or not he is present at the time. (2) Eavesdropping is a Class D felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Basham v. Commonwealth (1984) held wiretap evidence obtained under a valid federal order is admissible in Kentucky, though it noted no state law authorizes electronic surveillance by Kentucky police. Brock v. Commonwealth (1997) held the exclusionary rule reaches only constitutional violations, so a private recording was not suppressed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Springer v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1999, 998 S.W.2d 439)✓A neighbor used a police scanner to tape cordless calls from the victim's home, and detectives played it to induce Eades to confess; the court held the federal wiretap act and Kentucky's eavesdropping statutes did not bar using it against someone who was not a party to the calls.
- Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 151 S.W.3d 781)✓Wal-Mart secretly ran about forty hours of audio and video surveillance of employees in a store claims area; the court did not decide whether that violated KRS 526.020, holding instead that the employees' statutory claim failed for lack of damages caused by the recording itself.
- Brock v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1997, 947 S.W.2d 24)✓Brock, claiming self-defense, was kept from using a private tape of the victim's mother saying her son had gone to kill him; the court held that even assuming the tape violated KRS 526.020, the exclusionary rule reaches only state action, so suppression was not required.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Kentucky Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 508: ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 508.130StalkingIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) As used in this section, unless the context requires otherwise: (a) 1. "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of two (2) or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose. 2. One (1) or more of these acts may include: a. Those by which a person, directly or indirectly, by any means or method: i. Follows, monitors, observes, surveils, or threatens another person; or ii. Interferes with another person's property; or b. The use of any equipment, instrument, machine, or other device by which communication or information is transmitted, including but not limited to: i. Computers; ii. The internet, internet applications, social media platforms, email, text messages, instant messages, or any other electronic network; iii. Cameras or other recording devices; iv. Telephones or other personal communications devices; v. Scanners or other copying devices; and vi. Any device that enables the use of a transmitting device. 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)“…Physical injury; or 3. Death. "Stalking" is defined in KRS 508.130(1) as follows: (a) To "stalk" means t…”
- Halloway v. Simmons (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 532 S.W.3d 158)“…sical injury; or 3. Death There, stalking is defined in KRS 508.130 as meaning, (1) (a) To engage in an i…”
- Calhoun v. Wood (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 516 S.W.3d 357)“…(2) or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose .... KRS 508.130. In the circuit court, Wood alleged t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections, Kentucky GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Kentucky Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 511: BURGLARY AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 511.070Criminal trespass in the second degreeIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the second degree when he or she knowingly enters or remains: (a) Unlawfully in a building or upon premises as to which notice against trespass is given by fencing or other enclosure; or (b) In a workplace, while engaging in threatening behavior, as to which notice against trespass is given verbally or in writing by the applicable employer, an employee with the employer's authorization, or an authorized agent of the employer. (2) For the purposes of this section, notice against trespass includes the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property if the marks are: (a) Vertical lines of not less than eight (8) inches in length and not less than one (1) inch in width; (b) Placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three (3) feet from the ground nor more than five (5) feet from the ground; and (c) Placed at locations that are readily visible to any person approaching the property and no more than: 1. One hundred (100) feet apart on forest land; or 2. One thousand (1,000) feet apart on land other than forest land.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Colwell v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2000, 37 S.W.3d 721)“…enclosure," the offense is second-degree criminal trespass. KRS 511.070(1) (emphasis added). If the property wa…”
- McGruder v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2016, 487 S.W.3d 884)“…building or dwelling with no further criminal intent. See KRS 511.070. On the other' hand, the Commonwealth…”
- Kiser v. Commonwealth (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2008, 289 S.W.3d 589)“…as a "structure" or a "building." For example, pursuant to KRS 511.070(1), one is guilty of second-degree crim…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Legal Limits, Kentucky Disorderly Conduct Laws: Penalties, Trespass and Purple Paint
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 531: PORNOGRAPHY
§ 531.090VoyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of voyeurism when: (a) He or she intentionally: 1. Uses or causes the use of any camera, videotape, photooptical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; or 2. Uses the unaided eye or any device designed to improve visual acuity for the purpose of observing or viewing the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; or 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kentucky courts have treated KRS 531.090 largely as a jury-instruction question. Williams v. Commonwealth (2005) held the 2002 voyeurism statute could not reach conduct predating its July 15, 2002 effective date, and Morgan v. Commonwealth (2006) held voyeurism is not a lesser-included offense of first-degree burglary.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2005, 178 S.W.3d 491)✓Williams photographed his eight-year-old stepdaughter naked in January 2001 and sought a lesser-included voyeurism instruction; the court held KRS 531.090 created a new offense effective July 15, 2002 and was not retroactive, so it could not reach his earlier conduct.
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)✓Morgan watched a couple through a trailer window, then cut the phone line and broke in armed; the court held voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is not a lesser-included offense of first-degree burglary because it requires proof of unlawful entry to view another person.
- Commonwealth v. Mixon (Kentucky Supreme Court 1992, 827 S.W.2d 689)“…lier cases, arising under the former habitual criminal act, KRS 531.090, required authenticated records of fore…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Disputes, Kentucky School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights, Kentucky Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 61: GENERAL PROVISIONS AS TO OFFICES AND OFFICERS -- SOCIAL SECURITY FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES -- EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
§ 61.805Definitions for KRS 61.805 to 61.850In forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in KRS 61.805 to 61.850, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Meeting" means all gatherings of every kind, including video teleconferences, regardless of where the meeting is held, and whether regular or special and informational or casual gatherings held in anticipation of or in conjunction with a regular or special meeting; (2) "Public agency" means: (a) Every state or local government board, commission, and authority; (b) Every state or local legislative board, commission, and committee; (c) Every county and city governing body, council, school district board, special district board, and municipal corporation; (d) Every state or local government agency, including the policy-making board of an institution of education, created by or pursuant to state or local statute, executive order, ordinance, resolution, or other legislative act; (e) Any body created by or pursuant to state or local statute, executive order, ordinance, resolution, or other legislative act in the legislative or executive branch of government; (f) Any entity when the majority of its governing body is appointed by a "public agency" as defined in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (g), or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Floyd County Board of Education v. Ratliff (Kentucky Supreme Court 1997, 955 S.W.2d 921)“…hool board and its members violated the Open Meetings laws. KRS 61.805 et seq. KRS 61.805 requires that "all…”
- Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co. v. University of Louisville Board of Trustees (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1979, 596 S.W.2d 374)“…ouisville Foundation, Inc. is a public agency as defined in KRS 61.805(2); (2) that the meetings of the Founda…”
- Webster County Board of Education v. Franklin (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2013, 392 S.W.3d 431)“…y Clerk, as a public agency, the Board violated KRS 61.810, KRS 61.805(3), and the Open Meetings Act. In essen…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Laws on Recording Police: Your First Amendment Rights
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 61: GENERAL PROVISIONS AS TO OFFICES AND OFFICERS -- SOCIAL SECURITY FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES -- EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM § 61.010 (Office not to be sold -- Penalty -- Contracts to sell are void)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- KRS 526.020 - Eavesdropping(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS Chapter 61 - Open Records and Open Meetings(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 511.070 - Criminal Trespass in the Second Degree(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 531.090 - Voyeurism(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- FAA - Unmanned Aircraft Systems(faa.gov).gov
- FERPA - Protecting Student Privacy (U.S. Department of Education)(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- Kentucky Court of Justice - Rules of Practice(kycourts.gov).gov
- KRS 511.080 - Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 500.130 - Operation of Unmanned Aircraft System(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 411.067 - Action Against Operator of Unmanned Aircraft System(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 61.840 - Open Meetings: Conditions for Attendance(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 158.165 - Student Personal Telecommunications Devices(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- 39 CFR 232.1 - Conduct on Postal Property(ecfr.gov).gov