Kentucky
Kentucky Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
Kentucky permits surveillance cameras on private property in areas without a reasonable expectation of privacy, with no single statute governing all uses. KRS 531.090 criminalizes voyeuristic recording as a Class A misdemeanor, KRS 531.100 elevates distribution to a Class D felony, and KRS 526.020 applies a one-party consent rule to all audio recording.
Overview of Kentucky Surveillance Camera Laws
Kentucky does not have a single comprehensive surveillance camera statute. Instead, several laws work together to regulate where and how cameras can be used throughout the Commonwealth. The key statutes include KRS 526.020 (eavesdropping), KRS 531.090 (voyeurism), KRS 531.100 (video voyeurism), and KRS 508.130 (stalking).
The common thread across all of these laws is the concept of a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Surveillance cameras are generally legal in Kentucky when used in areas where people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as public streets, front yards, and common areas of businesses. Recording becomes illegal when cameras are placed to capture images or audio in private spaces without consent.
Understanding these laws is essential for homeowners installing security systems, employers setting up workplace monitoring, and anyone who wants to protect their own privacy rights in the Commonwealth.
Home Security Camera Laws in Kentucky
Kentucky law permits homeowners to install security cameras on their own property for purposes such as deterring crime, monitoring deliveries, and keeping an eye on their home while away. There is no state law requiring homeowners to register security cameras or obtain a permit before installation.
Where You Can Place Home Security Cameras
You can legally place cameras in the following areas of your property:
- Front door and porch areas for monitoring visitors and package deliveries
- Driveways and garages to record vehicle activity
- Backyards to monitor your own property
- Common living areas inside your home, such as living rooms and kitchens
- Exterior walls aimed at your own property boundaries
Where You Cannot Place Home Security Cameras
Cameras become illegal when they are positioned to record areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Bathrooms and restrooms in your home where guests or residents expect privacy
- Guest bedrooms where visitors are staying
- Pointed directly into a neighbor's windows or interior living spaces
- Any area where someone is undressing or engaged in private activities
Under KRS 531.090, a person is guilty of voyeurism when they intentionally use any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent. The statute also requires that the other person be in a place where a reasonable person would believe those parts would not be observed or recorded without their knowledge. Voyeurism does not cover ordinary recording of a clothed person in view of a camera. Violating this provision is a Class A misdemeanor.
Ring Doorbells and Smart Cameras
Video doorbells and smart security cameras like Ring, Nest, and Arlo are legal in Kentucky. These devices typically record your own porch and the public sidewalk or street in front of your home. Since these areas are in public view, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, and recording is permitted.
However, if a doorbell camera captures a wide angle that includes a neighbor's interior spaces through their windows, this could raise privacy concerns under Kentucky law. Position your smart cameras to focus primarily on your own property and public areas.
Audio Recording on Home Security Cameras
Many modern security cameras include microphone capabilities. In Kentucky, audio recording is governed separately from video recording under KRS 526.020. Kentucky follows a one-party consent rule for audio recording, meaning you can record a conversation if you are a participant or if at least one party to the conversation has given consent.
For outdoor security cameras that pick up ambient sounds and conversations of passersby, the safest approach is to either disable audio recording on exterior cameras or post visible signage indicating that audio and video recording is in progress. Anyone who continues a conversation within range of the camera after seeing such signage has arguably given implied consent.
Audio Recording Laws in Kentucky (One-Party Consent)
Kentucky is a one-party consent state for audio recording. KRS 526.010 and KRS 526.020 govern eavesdropping and the recording of communications in the Commonwealth.
What the Law Says
Under KRS 526.010, "eavesdrop" means to overhear, record, amplify, or transmit any part of a wire or oral communication of others without the consent of at least one party by means of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.
KRS 526.020 makes it a criminal offense to intentionally use any device to eavesdrop, whether or not the person is present at the time. Eavesdropping is a Class D felony.
What One-Party Consent Means in Practice
If you are part of a conversation, whether in person, on the phone, or through any electronic means, you can legally record it without telling the other participants. You do not need to inform anyone else that the recording is taking place, as long as you are a party to the conversation.
However, you cannot place a hidden recording device to capture conversations between other people when you are not present and no party to the conversation has consented. Doing so is illegal eavesdropping under Kentucky law.
Penalties for Illegal Audio Recording
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Max Prison/Jail | Max Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eavesdropping | KRS 526.020 | Class D Felony | 1 to 5 years | $10,000 |
| Installing eavesdropping device | KRS 526.030 | Class D Felony | 1 to 5 years | $10,000 |
| Possession of eavesdropping device | KRS 526.040 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
| Tampering with private communications | KRS 526.050 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
| Divulging illegally obtained information | KRS 526.060 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
Exceptions to the Eavesdropping Law
KRS 526.070 provides exceptions to the eavesdropping statutes. A person is not guilty under Chapter 526 when:
- They are a party to the communication or have been given consent by one party
- They are acting under lawful court order or warrant
- They are a law enforcement officer conducting a lawful criminal investigation
- They are a telephone company employee acting in the normal course of employment
Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws in Kentucky
Kentucky does not have a specific statute governing workplace video surveillance. Employers in the Commonwealth generally follow federal law and common-law privacy principles when installing cameras at work.
What Employers Can Do
Employers may install video surveillance cameras in the following areas:
- Lobbies, hallways, and reception areas for security purposes
- Parking lots to protect employees and company property
- Warehouses and production floors to monitor operations
- Cash register areas to prevent theft
- Loading docks and entry points for security
What Employers Cannot Do
Even without a specific state statute, employers face restrictions based on privacy tort law and federal guidelines:
- Restrooms and changing areas are always off-limits for surveillance
- Break rooms may raise privacy concerns depending on the circumstances
- Union meeting areas are protected under the National Labor Relations Act
- Private offices where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy may require notice
Audio Surveillance at Work
Employers who use cameras with audio recording capabilities must comply with KRS 526.020. Since Kentucky is a one-party consent state, an employer cannot record private conversations between employees unless at least one party to the conversation has consented. The best practice for employers is to provide written notice to all employees that audio and video surveillance is in use and to obtain signed acknowledgments.
Employee Notification
While Kentucky does not require employers to notify employees of video-only surveillance, providing notice is strongly recommended. A clear workplace surveillance policy should outline where cameras are located, whether audio is recorded, how footage is stored, who has access to recordings, and how long recordings are retained. This transparency helps employers avoid invasion of privacy claims.
Hidden Cameras and Voyeurism Laws in Kentucky
Kentucky takes hidden camera crimes seriously. The Commonwealth has two primary statutes addressing voyeurism and video voyeurism, both found in KRS Chapter 531.
KRS 531.090: Voyeurism
KRS 531.090 makes it illegal for a person to intentionally:
- Use any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photoelectric, or other image recording device to observe, view, photograph, film, or videotape the sexual conduct, genitals, undergarments not publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent
- Use the unaided eye or any device designed to improve visual acuity for the same purpose without the other person's consent
- Enter or remain unlawfully on another person's premises for the same purpose without that person's consent
In every case the statute also requires that the other person be in a place where a reasonable person would believe that his or her sexual conduct, genitals, undergarments, or nipple of the female breast will not be observed, viewed, photographed, filmed, or videotaped without his or her knowledge. Recording that does not capture those specific body parts is not voyeurism under this section.
Voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 12 months in jail under KRS 532.090 and a fine of up to $500 under KRS 534.040.
KRS 531.100: Video Voyeurism
KRS 531.100 addresses the more serious offense of video voyeurism, which involves not just the recording but also the distribution or sale of voyeuristic images. A person is guilty of video voyeurism when they intentionally:
- Use any image recording device to observe, view, photograph, film, or videotape the sexual conduct, genitals, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent, and
- Use or divulge the image obtained for consideration (payment), or
- Distribute the image by live or recorded visual medium, electronic mail, the Internet, or a commercial online service
The two sections are not identical in scope. KRS 531.100 does not include the "undergarment worn without being publicly visible" category that appears in KRS 531.090.
Video voyeurism under KRS 531.100 is a Class D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison under KRS 532.060 and a fine of $1,000 to $10,000 under KRS 534.030.
Exceptions to Voyeurism Laws
KRS 531.090 provides exceptions for:
- Law enforcement officers conducting lawful criminal investigations
- Employees of the Department of Corrections, Department of Juvenile Justice, private prisons, local jails, or correctional facilities whose actions have been authorized for security or investigative purposes
Evidence Handling in Voyeurism Cases
Unless objected to by the victim, the court shall order the sealing of all photographs, film, videotapes, or other images introduced into evidence during a prosecution under KRS 531.090. At the conclusion of the prosecution, the court shall order the destruction of all such images in the possession of law enforcement, the prosecution, or the court, unless they are needed for additional prosecutions.
Neighbor Disputes Over Security Cameras in Kentucky
Disagreements between neighbors about security cameras are common throughout Kentucky. The law provides some guidance on resolving these disputes.
When a Neighbor's Camera Is Legal
A neighbor's security camera is generally legal if it:
- Is pointed at the neighbor's own property
- Captures public areas like sidewalks and streets
- Records only video (without audio) of areas in public view
- Does not peer into your windows or private enclosed spaces
When a Neighbor's Camera May Be Illegal
A neighbor's camera may violate Kentucky law if it:
- Is deliberately aimed to look inside your home through windows
- Records your fully fenced backyard from an elevated position, capturing areas hidden from public view
- Records audio of your private conversations without your consent, violating KRS 526.020
- Is a hidden camera placed on your property without your knowledge
- Is used as part of a pattern of behavior that amounts to stalking under KRS 508.130
Steps to Resolve a Camera Dispute
-
Talk to your neighbor. Many disputes arise from cameras that were not intentionally aimed at your property. A polite conversation can often resolve the issue.
-
Document the situation. If the camera clearly invades your privacy, take photos or video showing the camera's position and what it captures.
-
Send a written request. Ask your neighbor in writing to adjust the camera angle or position.
-
Contact local authorities. If you believe a neighbor is using a camera to engage in voyeurism or to record your private activities, file a police report. Violations of KRS 531.090 are criminal offenses.
-
Consult an attorney. You may have grounds for a civil invasion of privacy lawsuit if a neighbor's camera is deliberately aimed to capture your private activities.
Physical Solutions
You can also take steps to block a camera's view of your property:
- Install privacy fencing along your property line
- Plant tall hedges or trees to create natural barriers
- Use window film or curtains to block interior views
- Install your own cameras to document any intrusive behavior
Stalking and Harassment Through Surveillance
Kentucky's stalking statute, KRS 508.130, can apply when surveillance cameras are used as part of a pattern of harassing or threatening behavior.
Under KRS 508.130, a "course of conduct" includes one or more acts involving the use of any camera or other recording device, computer, Internet, telephone, or other personal communications device. A person is guilty of stalking when they intentionally engage in a course of conduct directed at another person that seriously alarms, annoys, intimidates, or harasses that person, serves no legitimate purpose, and causes the person substantial mental distress, while consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the conduct would cause that distress.
Stalking is a Class D felony, carrying 1 to 5 years in prison. It is elevated to a Class C felony (5 to 10 years) when aggravating factors are present, such as an existing protective order covering the same victim, a pending criminal complaint, a prior felony or Class A misdemeanor conviction against the same victim within the last five years, use of a deadly weapon, or conduct that places the victim in reasonable fear of sexual contact, physical injury, or death.
Nanny Cam Laws in Kentucky
Nanny cameras, or hidden cameras used to monitor caregivers in your home, are subject to specific rules in Kentucky.
Where You Can Place a Nanny Cam
- Living rooms and family rooms where childcare takes place
- Kitchens and dining areas
- Playrooms and nurseries (in common areas)
- Hallways and entryways
Where You Cannot Place a Nanny Cam
- Bathrooms used by the caregiver
- Bedrooms designated for the caregiver's private use (for live-in nannies)
- Any room where the caregiver changes clothes or has a reasonable expectation of privacy
Placing a hidden camera in a location where someone has a reasonable expectation of privacy could result in criminal charges under KRS 531.090 if it captures the intimate body parts that statute covers, and it can support a civil invasion of privacy claim regardless.
Audio on Nanny Cams
If your nanny cam records audio, Kentucky's one-party consent law under KRS 526.020 applies. Since you are not present during the conversations being recorded, and no party to those conversations has consented, recording audio without the caregiver's knowledge could violate the eavesdropping statute and constitute a Class D felony.
The safest approach is to either disable audio recording on the nanny cam or inform the caregiver in writing that audio and video recording takes place in the home. Many legal professionals recommend always notifying the caregiver about any cameras in the home, even video-only cameras, to avoid potential legal disputes.
Penalties Summary for Surveillance Violations in Kentucky
| Violation | Statute | Classification | Max Prison/Jail | Max Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voyeurism | KRS 531.090 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
| Video voyeurism (recording + distribution) | KRS 531.100 | Class D Felony | 1 to 5 years | $10,000 |
| Eavesdropping (illegal audio recording) | KRS 526.020 | Class D Felony | 1 to 5 years | $10,000 |
| Installing eavesdropping device | KRS 526.030 | Class D Felony | 1 to 5 years | $10,000 |
| Possession of eavesdropping device | KRS 526.040 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
| Tampering with private communications | KRS 526.050 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
| Divulging illegally obtained info | KRS 526.060 | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months | $500 |
| Stalking | KRS 508.130 | Class D Felony | 1 to 5 years | $10,000 |
| Stalking (aggravating factor present) | KRS 508.130 | Class C Felony | 5 to 10 years | $10,000 |
HOA and Local Regulations
In addition to state law, homeowners in Kentucky may be subject to additional surveillance camera rules imposed by their homeowners association (HOA) or local municipality.
HOA Camera Rules
Kentucky does not have a statewide law governing HOA security camera policies. The Commonwealth's HOA laws are primarily outlined in the Kentucky Condominium Act and the Kentucky Horizontal Property Law. Security camera regulations are primarily governed by individual HOA governing documents rather than specific state legislation.
Common HOA restrictions include requirements that cameras be aesthetically discreet, prohibitions on cameras aimed at common areas managed by the HOA, and rules about notification to the association before installation.
Before installing cameras in an HOA community, review your governing documents or contact your HOA board for guidance.
Local Ordinances
Some Kentucky cities and counties may have additional regulations regarding security cameras, particularly for commercial properties. Check with your local city hall or county clerk's office for any applicable ordinances. Louisville, Lexington, and other larger cities may have specific requirements for commercial surveillance systems.
Related Kentucky Camera and Privacy Laws
- Kentucky Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in Kentucky.
- Kentucky Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- Kentucky Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- Kentucky Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in Kentucky.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
- HOA Security Camera Rules
- Neighbor Security Camera Laws
- Nanny Cam Laws
- Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws
- Landlord Security Camera Laws
More Kentucky Laws
- Kentucky Landlord-Tenant Laws (2026): Deposits, Notice, and Tenant Rights
- Kentucky Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
- Kentucky Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026)
Frequently Asked Questions
Are home security cameras legal in Kentucky?
Yes. Kentucky homeowners can legally install security cameras on their own property. Cameras may record outdoor areas such as driveways, porches, and yards, as well as common indoor areas like living rooms and kitchens. However, cameras cannot be placed in areas where others have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as bathrooms, guest bedrooms, or aimed directly into a neighbor's home. KRS 531.090 is narrower than many people assume: it covers using a camera to capture another person's sexual conduct, genitals, undergarments worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast without consent, in a place where that person would reasonably expect not to be recorded. That offense is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to 12 months in jail.
Can my neighbor legally point a security camera at my house in Kentucky?
It depends on what the camera captures. A neighbor's camera may legally record their own property and public areas like sidewalks or streets, even if your home appears in the background. However, if the camera is deliberately aimed to look inside your windows or into a fully fenced backyard where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy, it could violate Kentucky voyeurism laws under KRS 531.090, though that statute reaches only recordings that capture the intimate body parts it lists. If the camera records audio of your private conversations without your consent, it may also violate the eavesdropping statute under KRS 526.020, which is a Class D felony.
Is it legal to use a nanny cam in Kentucky?
Yes, you can use a nanny cam in common areas of your home such as living rooms, kitchens, and playrooms. However, cameras cannot be placed in bathrooms or private bedrooms used by the caregiver. If the nanny cam records audio, you must comply with the one-party consent rule under KRS 526.020. Since you are not present during the recorded conversations, the safest approach is to inform the caregiver about both audio and video recording. Many attorneys recommend disclosing all cameras, even video-only ones, to avoid legal disputes.
Can my employer record me at work with security cameras in Kentucky?
Kentucky does not have a specific law addressing workplace video surveillance. Employers may generally install video cameras in common work areas such as lobbies, hallways, production floors, and parking lots. Cameras are prohibited in restrooms, changing areas, and other spaces where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If cameras record audio, employers must comply with KRS 526.020, which requires at least one party to a conversation to consent to the recording. Employers are strongly encouraged to provide written notice of all surveillance.
What are the penalties for illegal surveillance in Kentucky?
Penalties depend on the specific violation. Voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is a Class A misdemeanor carrying up to 12 months in jail and a $500 fine. Video voyeurism under KRS 531.100, which involves recording and distributing images, is a Class D felony punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison and up to $10,000 in fines. Illegal eavesdropping (unauthorized audio recording) under KRS 526.020 is also a Class D felony with the same sentencing range. Using surveillance as part of a stalking pattern under KRS 508.130 is a Class D felony, elevated to a Class C felony when aggravating factors such as an existing protective order or use of a deadly weapon are present.
Updates
Corrected the description of Kentucky's voyeurism statutes: KRS 531.090 and KRS 531.100 cover recording specific intimate body parts where a person reasonably expects privacy, not a person's body generally, and fine amounts are now cited to KRS 534.040 and KRS 534.030 rather than the imprisonment statutes.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the penalty classification for KRS 526.050 (tampering with private communications) and KRS 526.060 (divulging illegally obtained information): both are Class A misdemeanors under their own text, not Class D felonies. Fixed in both penalty tables on the page.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the stalking section: KRS 508.140/508.150 (first/second degree stalking) were repealed in 2026 and replaced by a single unified stalking offense under KRS 508.130 (Class D felony, elevated to Class C with aggravating factors); updated every reference across the article, the penalties table, and the Sources list.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 531: PORNOGRAPHY
§ 531.090VoyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of voyeurism when: (a) He or she intentionally: 1. Uses or causes the use of any camera, videotape, photooptical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; or 2. Uses the unaided eye or any device designed to improve visual acuity for the purpose of observing or viewing the sexual conduct, genitals, an undergarment worn without being publicly visible, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; or 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kentucky courts have treated KRS 531.090 largely as a jury-instruction question. Williams v. Commonwealth (2005) held the 2002 voyeurism statute could not reach conduct predating its July 15, 2002 effective date, and Morgan v. Commonwealth (2006) held voyeurism is not a lesser-included offense of first-degree burglary.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2005, 178 S.W.3d 491)✓Williams photographed his eight-year-old stepdaughter naked in January 2001 and sought a lesser-included voyeurism instruction; the court held KRS 531.090 created a new offense effective July 15, 2002 and was not retroactive, so it could not reach his earlier conduct.
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)✓Morgan watched a couple through a trailer window, then cut the phone line and broke in armed; the court held voyeurism under KRS 531.090 is not a lesser-included offense of first-degree burglary because it requires proof of unlawful entry to view another person.
- Commonwealth v. Mixon (Kentucky Supreme Court 1992, 827 S.W.2d 689)“…lier cases, arising under the former habitual criminal act, KRS 531.090, required authenticated records of fore…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Kentucky Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Disputes
§ 531.100Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of video voyeurism when he or she intentionally: (a) Uses or causes the use of any camera, videotape, photooptical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping the sexual conduct, genitals, or nipple of the female breast of another person without that person's consent; and (b) Uses or divulges any image so obtained for consideration; or (c) Distributes any image so obtained by live or recorded visual medium, electronic mail, the Internet, or a commercial on-line service. (2) Video voyeurism is a Class D felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Daniels (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 193 S.W.3d 754)“…in Jefferson Circuit Court to one count of Video Voyeurism, KRS 531.100, and in Hardin Circuit Court to one cou…”
- Daniels v. Kentucky Bar Association (Kentucky Supreme Court 2008, 247 S.W.3d 530)“…ovant was indicted in Jefferson County for video voyeurism, KRS 531.100, a felony that criminalizes the non-co'…”
- Michelle Bray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Kentucky Supreme Court 2025)“…sexual performance by a minor. KRS 531.320(1) (promoting); KRS 531.100(3) (defining “promote”). 17 The…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): Workplace Surveillance Rights, Kentucky Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Kentucky Nursing Home Camera Laws: HB 491 and What Applies Today
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 526: EAVESDROPPING AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 526.020EavesdroppingIn forcecited in 20 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of eavesdropping when he intentionally uses any device to eavesdrop, whether or not he is present at the time. (2) Eavesdropping is a Class D felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Basham v. Commonwealth (1984) held wiretap evidence obtained under a valid federal order is admissible in Kentucky, though it noted no state law authorizes electronic surveillance by Kentucky police. Brock v. Commonwealth (1997) held the exclusionary rule reaches only constitutional violations, so a private recording was not suppressed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Springer v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1999, 998 S.W.2d 439)✓A neighbor used a police scanner to tape cordless calls from the victim's home, and detectives played it to induce Eades to confess; the court held the federal wiretap act and Kentucky's eavesdropping statutes did not bar using it against someone who was not a party to the calls.
- Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 151 S.W.3d 781)✓Wal-Mart secretly ran about forty hours of audio and video surveillance of employees in a store claims area; the court did not decide whether that violated KRS 526.020, holding instead that the employees' statutory claim failed for lack of damages caused by the recording itself.
- Brock v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1997, 947 S.W.2d 24)✓Brock, claiming self-defense, was kept from using a private tape of the victim's mother saying her son had gone to kill him; the court held that even assuming the tape violated KRS 526.020, the exclusionary rule reaches only state action, so suppression was not required.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Kentucky Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Kentucky Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and Healthcare Privacy
§ 526.010DefinitionIn forcecited in 15 of our articles
The following definition applies in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: "Eavesdrop" means to overhear, record, amplify or transmit any part of a wire or oral communication of others without the consent of at least one (1) party thereto by means of any electronic, mechanical or other device.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Major v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 177 S.W.3d 700)“…the activity was appropriate under Kentucky Criminal Law, KRS 526.010; thus not in violation of his Fourth Am…”
- Springer v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1999, 998 S.W.2d 439)“…ions, is not precluded by 18 U.S.C. § 2510 , et seq. and KRS 526.010, et seq. Nor do these statutes have a…”
- Carrier v. Commonwealth (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1980, 607 S.W.2d 115)“…ucky to depart from the federal norm. See also KRS 526.010, which defines “eavesdrop” as “to overh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Phone Call Recording Laws: What You Need to Know, Kentucky School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights, Kentucky Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules
§ 526.030Installing eavesdropping deviceIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of installing an eavesdropping device when he intentionally installs or places such a device in any place with the knowledge that it is to be used for eavesdropping. (2) Installing an eavesdropping device is a Class D felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 151 S.W.3d 781)“…e that it was to be used for eavesdropping, in violation of KRS 526.030. 3. That the defendants, Wal-Mart Sto…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
§ 526.040Possession of eavesdropping deviceIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of possession of an eavesdropping device when he possesses any electronic, mechanical or other device designed or commonly used for eavesdropping with intent to use that device to eavesdrop or knowing that another intends to use that device to eavesdrop. (2) Possession of an eavesdropping device is a Class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
§ 526.050Tampering with private communicationsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of tampering with private communications when knowing that he does not have the consent of the sender or receiver, he unlawfully: (a) Opens or reads a sealed letter or other sealed private communication; or (b) Obtains in any manner from an employee, officer or representative of a communications common carrier information with respect to the contents or nature of a communication. (2) The provisions of this section do not apply to the censoring of sealed letters or sealed communications for security purposes in official detention or penal facilities. (3) Tampering with private communications is a Class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
§ 526.060Divulging illegally obtained informationIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) A person is guilty of divulging illegally obtained information when he knowingly uses or divulges information obtained through eavesdropping or tampering with private communications or learned in the course of employment with a communications common carrier engaged in transmitting the message. (2) Divulging illegally obtained information is a Class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Springer v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1999, 998 S.W.2d 439)“…and state law. 18 U.S.C. § 2510 , et seq.; KRS 526.020; KRS 526.060. As with her "invocation of silence" ar…”
- Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 151 S.W.3d 781)“…information obtained through eavesdropping in violation of KRS 526.060. 5. That the acts of the defendants,…”
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…Code § 808B.2 (1994); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4002 (1995); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 526.060 (Michie 1999); La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 1…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 526.070Eavesdropping -- ExceptionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A person is not guilty under this chapter when he: (1) Inadvertently overhears the communication through a regularly installed telephone party line or on a telephone extension but does not divulge it; or (2) Is an employee of a communications common carrier who, while acting in the course of his employment, intercepts, discloses or uses a communication transmitted through the facilities of his employer for a purpose which is a necessary incident to the rendition of the service or to the protection of the rights or the property of the carrier of such communication, provided however that communications common carriers shall not utilize service observing or random monitoring except for mechanical or service quality control checks.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Trenton Easterling v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Kentucky Supreme Court 2019)“…om could be recorded and used against Easterling. Although KRS 526.070 contains two exceptions to the eavesdr…”
- McPherson (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 2026)“…757 F.3d 497 (6th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, harassment under KRS 526.070 “requires proof of the additional fac…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 508: ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 508.130StalkingIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) As used in this section, unless the context requires otherwise: (a) 1. "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of two (2) or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose. 2. One (1) or more of these acts may include: a. Those by which a person, directly or indirectly, by any means or method: i. Follows, monitors, observes, surveils, or threatens another person; or ii. Interferes with another person's property; or b. The use of any equipment, instrument, machine, or other device by which communication or information is transmitted, including but not limited to: i. Computers; ii. The internet, internet applications, social media platforms, email, text messages, instant messages, or any other electronic network; iii. Cameras or other recording devices; iv. Telephones or other personal communications devices; v. Scanners or other copying devices; and vi. Any device that enables the use of a transmitting device. 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morgan v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2006, 189 S.W.3d 99)“…Physical injury; or 3. Death. "Stalking" is defined in KRS 508.130(1) as follows: (a) To "stalk" means t…”
- Halloway v. Simmons (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 532 S.W.3d 158)“…sical injury; or 3. Death There, stalking is defined in KRS 508.130 as meaning, (1) (a) To engage in an i…”
- Calhoun v. Wood (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 516 S.W.3d 357)“…(2) or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose .... KRS 508.130. In the circuit court, Wood alleged t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions, Kentucky Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections, Kentucky GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 532: CLASSIFICATION AND DESIGNATION OF OFFENSES -- AUTHORIZED DISPOSITION
§ 532.060Sentence of imprisonment for felony -- Postincarceration supervisionIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(1) A sentence of imprisonment for a felony shall be an indeterminate sentence, the maximum of which shall be fixed within the limits provided by subsection (2) of this section, and subject to modification by the trial judge pursuant to KRS 532.070. (2) Unless otherwise provided by law, the authorized maximum terms of imprisonment for felonies are: (a) For a Class A felony, not less than twenty (20) years nor more than fifty (50) years, or life imprisonment; (b) For a Class B felony, not less than ten (10) years nor more than twenty (20) years; (c) For a Class C felony, not less than five (5) years nor more than ten (10) years; and (d) For a Class D felony, not less than one (1) year nor more than five (5) years. (3) For any felony specified in KRS Chapter 510 or KRS 529.100, 529.110, 530.020, 530.064(1)(a), 531.310, 531.320, 531.335, or 531.340, the sentence shall include an additional five (5) year period of postincarceration supervision which shall be added to the maximum sentence rendered for the offense.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 163 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Reneer (Kentucky Supreme Court 1987, 734 S.W.2d 794)“…ediately after imposition of sentence." See Commentary to KRS 532.060. Although the Parole Board has promulga…”
- Dixon v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2008, 263 S.W.3d 583)“…Blockburger test). 20 . Under KRS 532.060(2)(b), the punishment range for a Class…”
- Young v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2000, 25 S.W.3d 66)“…of imprisonment for a felony is fixed by a jury pursuant to KRS 532.060 and the trial court, having regard to t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Assault Laws: Four Degrees, Felonies and Penalties (2026), Kentucky Embezzlement and Forgery Laws: KRS 514.070 Penalties, Kentucky Extortion Laws: Theft by Extortion, Coercion and Penalties
§ 532.090Sentence of imprisonment for misdemeanorIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
A sentence of imprisonment for a misdemeanor shall be a definite term and shall be fixed within the following maximum limitations: (1) For a Class A misdemeanor, the term shall not exceed twelve (12) months; and (2) For a Class B misdemeanor, the term shall not exceed ninety (90) days.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 30 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hoskins v. Maricle (Kentucky Supreme Court 2004, 150 S.W.3d 1)“…e to each offense. KRS 532.060 (imprisonment for felonies); KRS 532.090 (imprisonment for misdemeanors); KRS 53…”
- Johnson v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2003, 105 S.W.3d 430)“…n aggregate maximum penalty of twelve months incarceration, KRS 532.090(1), KRS 532.110(1)(b), were, pursuant t…”
- Commonwealth v. Hager (Kentucky Supreme Court 2001, 41 S.W.3d 828)“…y of twelve months in jail and a $500 fine. KRS 508.030(2); KRS 532.090(1); KRS 534.040(2)(a). Since the jurors…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Disorderly Conduct Laws: Penalties, Trespass and Purple Paint, Kentucky Felony Classes and Misdemeanor Penalties (2026), Kentucky Window Tint Laws (2026): Legal VLT Limits
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 534: FINES
§ 534.030Fines for feloniesIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(1) Except as otherwise provided for an offense defined outside this code, a person who has been convicted of any felony shall, in addition to any other punishment imposed upon him, be sentenced to pay a fine in an amount not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or double his gain from commission of the offense, whichever is the greater. (2) In determining the amount and method of paying a fine for commission of a felony, the court shall consider, among others, the following factors: (a) The defendant's ability to pay the amount of the fine; (b) The hardship likely to be imposed on the defendant's dependents by the amount of the fine and the time and method of paying it; (c) The impact the amount of the fine will have on the defendant's ability to make reparation or restitution to the victim; and (d) The amount of the defendant's gain, if any, derived from the commission of the offense.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jones v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2011, 382 S.W.3d 22)“…the court costs and jail fee were assessed in violation of KRS 534.030(4) because he was before the court as a…”
- Simpson v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 1994, 889 S.W.2d 781)“…(1964). The statutes at issue are KRS 532.030(3) and KRS 534.030(1). The latter statute is more specific…”
- Commonwealth v. Reed (Kentucky Supreme Court 2012, 374 S.W.3d 298)“…eded, the imposition of a $1,000 fine on Reed was improper. KRS 534.030 states: (1) ... a person who has been…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Manslaughter Laws: First and Second Degree (2026)
§ 534.040Fines for misdemeanors and violationsIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) Fines and imprisonment for misdemeanors shall not be mutually exclusive. In any case where imprisonment is authorized, a fine may be levied in addition to the imprisonment, or a fine may be levied as an alternative to imprisonment. Similarly, a fine may be levied in lieu of imprisonment. Whether the fine is to be levied as the sole penalty or as an additional or alternative penalty shall be in the discretion of the judge or jury as the case may be. If the trial is by jury, the jury shall have the discretion. This rule shall apply in all cases where a fine is not the exclusive penalty authorized by law. (2) Except as otherwise provided for an offense defined outside this code, a person who has been convicted of any offense other than a felony shall be sentenced, in addition to any other punishment imposed upon him, to pay a fine in an amount not to exceed: (a) For a Class A misdemeanor, five hundred dollars ($500); or (b) For a Class B misdemeanor, two hundred fifty dollars ($250); or (c) For a violation, two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (3) This section shall not apply to a corporation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 39 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Trigg v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2015, 460 S.W.3d 322)“…on, under KRS Chapter 31, and therefore, in accordance with KRS 534.040(4), the imposition of the fine was erro…”
- Terry v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2008, 253 S.W.3d 466)“…d imposition of a fine is contrary to, among other matters, KRS 534.040(4). [30] We note in passing that Ter…”
- Roberts v. Commonwealth (Kentucky Supreme Court 2013, 410 S.W.3d 606)“…a total of $1,500. We hold it clearly erred by doing so. KRS 534.040(1) and (2) authorize the imposition of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 531: PORNOGRAPHY § 531.010 (Definitions)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- KRS 526.020: Eavesdropping(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 526.010: Definition of Eavesdropping(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 531.090: Voyeurism(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 531.100: Video Voyeurism(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 526.070: Eavesdropping Exceptions(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 508.130: Stalking Definitions(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 532.060: Sentence of Imprisonment for Felony(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 532.090: Sentence of Imprisonment for Misdemeanor(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS Chapter 526: Eavesdropping and Related Offenses(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS Chapter 531: Pornography (Voyeurism Statutes)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 534.040: Fines for Misdemeanors and Violations(apps.legislature.ky.gov)
- KRS 534.030: Fines for Felonies(apps.legislature.ky.gov)