Minnesota Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Body Camera Rules

No Minnesota law bars recording police officers doing their jobs in public, and Minnesota's one-party consent rule under Minn. Stat. Section 626A.02 lets you record your own interactions with officers without notice. Whether the First Amendment protects recording police is not settled in Minnesota: the Eighth Circuit has not decided the question and has held that any such right was not clearly established in 2015.

Your Right to Record Police in Minnesota

No Minnesota statute bars recording law enforcement officers performing their duties in public, but the federal constitutional protection is less settled here than in most of the country. Eight federal appeals courts (the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits) have held that the First Amendment protects recording police officers doing their jobs in public, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner limits, and the Fourth Circuit has held that livestreaming a police traffic stop is protected speech. Those decisions do not bind Minnesota. The Eighth Circuit (which covers Minnesota) has held that taking photographs and recording videos in a public park to inform the public is protected speech (Ness v. City of Bloomington, 2021), but it has not decided whether the First Amendment protects recording police. In Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023), a divided panel held that observing and recording police was not clearly established as a First Amendment right as of 2015, and explained that Chestnut v. Wallace, 947 F.3d 1085 (8th Cir. 2020), could not establish such a right because Chestnut was a Fourth Amendment decision: it held that police could not detain a person merely for watching police-citizen interactions from a distance without interfering. In Robbins v. City of Des Moines, 984 F.3d 673 (8th Cir. 2021), the court assumed without deciding that recording was protected and gave the officers qualified immunity on that claim because they had reason to suspect more than recording. This means an officer who stops someone from recording may be shielded by qualified immunity in a Section 1983 suit even if a First Amendment right ultimately exists.

In practice, no Minnesota law stops you from filming, photographing, and audio recording police officers during traffic stops, arrests, searches, and other law enforcement activities happening in public spaces, but if an officer interferes, a damages claim may fail on qualified immunity. You can record your own interactions with police, and you can record interactions between police and other people that occur in areas open to the public.

Minnesota's one-party consent rule under Minn. Stat. Section 626A.02 covers the audio. As a participant in a conversation with a police officer, you can record the interaction without informing the officer. When recording police activity you are not directly involved in, the audio capture is lawful under Section 626A.02 as long as the recording takes place in a public setting where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

What You Can Record

Traffic Stops

You may record your own traffic stop. This includes:

• Video and audio of your interaction with the officer
• The officer's approach to your vehicle
• Conversations about the reason for the stop
• Field sobriety tests or vehicle searches
• The issuance of a citation or arrest

You can use your phone, a dashcam, or any other recording device. There is no requirement to inform the officer that you are recording, though some people choose to do so as a courtesy.

If you are a passenger in a vehicle, you may also record the traffic stop. Bystanders who witness a traffic stop from a public area can record as well.

Arrests and Detentions

No Minnesota law bars recording an arrest in progress from a public place, though the Eighth Circuit has not decided whether the First Amendment protects it. You can generally record:

• The arrest itself, including the use of force
• Statements made by officers and the person being arrested
• The surrounding circumstances and witness reactions
• Booking procedures in public areas of a police station

The key limitation is that your recording must not interfere with the arrest or endanger the safety of officers, the person being arrested, or bystanders.

Public Protests and Demonstrations

Minnesota has been at the center of national attention regarding police interactions with protesters, particularly following events in Minneapolis in 2020. Recording protests is expressive activity, and recording in public for an expressive purpose is protected in the Eighth Circuit (Ness v. City of Bloomington, 2021), but the court has not decided whether recording the police response is protected, and in Molina v. Book (2023) it gave officers qualified immunity against legal observers who watched and recorded a 2015 protest. In practice you can:

• Film police interactions with protesters
• Livestream events to social media platforms
• Document the use of crowd control tactics
• Record from your own property overlooking public events

Government Buildings and Public Spaces

Recording is often allowed in government buildings that are open to the public, but no Minnesota statute guarantees it, and building managers, courts, and legislative bodies can set their own rules. Places where recording is commonly allowed include:

• Police station lobbies and public areas
• Courthouses (subject to specific court rules)
• City halls and government offices
• Legislative buildings during public proceedings

Some government facilities may have specific rules about recording in certain areas. For example, individual courtrooms may have restrictions set by the presiding judge.

Limitations on Recording Police

Do Not Interfere with Police Operations

Whatever its constitutional status, recording police is not unlimited. You must not:

• Physically obstruct an officer performing their duties
• Cross police lines or barricades to get closer
• Trespass on private property to record
• Refuse to comply with lawful orders to move back
• Touch or grab an officer or their equipment
• Create a safety hazard for yourself or others

Minnesota law prohibits obstructing legal process or the duties of a peace officer under Minn. Stat. Section 609.50. Interfering with an officer while recording could result in arrest for obstruction. The penalty is tiered: a misdemeanor (up to 90 days and $1,000) in most cases, a gross misdemeanor (up to 364 days and $3,000) if the act involves force or violence or a threat of it, and a felony (up to 5 years and $10,000) if it risks or causes death, substantial bodily harm, or serious property damage.

Lawful Orders to Step Back

Police officers can order you to move to a safe distance if your presence creates a safety risk. An order to step back should be reasonable, and an order used only as a pretext to stop recording can be challenged later, though the Eighth Circuit has not settled how the First Amendment applies to recording police. If an officer tells you to step back:

• Comply with the order while continuing to record if possible
• Move to a safe distance that still allows recording
• Verbally state that you are recording
• Do not argue or resist; you can challenge the legality of the order later

Private Spaces and Sensitive Operations

Recording does not extend to:

• The interior of private homes during police operations (unless you are the occupant)
• Secure areas of police stations and jails
• Active crime scenes where public access is restricted
• Undercover operations where recording could endanger officers

Police Body Cameras in Minnesota

The Statutory Framework

Minnesota has specific legislation governing police body cameras. Minn. Stat. Section 626.8473 requires every law enforcement agency in Minnesota that uses portable recording systems (body cameras) to:

1. Establish a written policy governing the use, maintenance, storage, and release of data collected by the recording systems
2. Provide for public comment and input before adopting or materially changing the policy
3. Post the policy on the agency's website or make it available to the public upon request

This statute ensures transparency and community involvement in how body cameras are deployed and how footage is managed.

Policy Requirements

Under Section 626.8473, body camera policies must address:

• When officers must activate their cameras
• When officers may deactivate their cameras
• Procedures for documenting the reason cameras were not activated during specific incidents
• Data retention schedules
• Access controls for who can view footage
• Procedures for handling footage that captures sensitive situations

The requirement for public input before policy adoption is a significant feature of Minnesota's law. It gives community members a voice in determining how their interactions with police are recorded and how that footage is handled.

Body Camera Data Classification

Body camera footage in Minnesota is classified under Minn. Stat. Section 13.825, which was added to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act specifically to address portable recording system data. This section establishes a classification system for body camera footage:

• The default classification is private or nonpublic data. Body camera footage is presumed private unless it falls into one of the statute's public exceptions.
• Data become public when they document a peace officer's discharge of a firearm in the course of duty (where notice is required) or a use of force resulting in substantial bodily harm, when the subject of the recording requests it be made public (with non-consenting subjects redacted where practicable), or when they qualify as public personnel data.
• Active criminal investigative data captured by a body camera are governed by Minnesota's criminal investigative data provisions rather than this default classification, and data that are not public under other Data Practices Act provisions keep that classification.

Members of the public can submit data requests for body camera footage through the law enforcement agency that created the recording. Agencies must respond within a reasonable time and may charge reasonable fees for the cost of providing copies.

Data Retention Requirements

Section 13.825 sets minimum retention periods. Most body camera footage must be kept at least 90 days. Footage of a firearm discharge that requires notice, a use of force causing substantial bodily harm, or an incident that leads to a formal complaint must be kept at least one year, and footage of a use of deadly force must be kept indefinitely. A person recorded can ask the agency in writing to keep footage up to 180 more days for possible evidentiary use.

What to Do If Police Try to Stop Your Recording

Know Your Rights

If a police officer tells you to stop recording, you should know that:

• No Minnesota law bars recording police in public, though the Eighth Circuit has not decided whether the First Amendment protects it
• Whether an officer may order you to stop recording has not been settled in the Eighth Circuit, so comply with a lawful order and challenge it later
• Under Riley v. California (2014), police generally need a warrant to search the contents of your phone, although they may hold it while they get one
• No Minnesota law requires you to delete a recording

Practical Steps

If confronted by an officer about your recording:

1. Stay calm and polite. Do not escalate the situation.
2. Clearly state that you are recording from a distance and will not interfere.
3. Do not physically resist if an officer attempts to take your device. Verbal objection is sufficient to preserve your legal rights.
4. Comply with lawful orders to step back while continuing to record from a distance.
5. Do not delete recordings on your own. No Minnesota law requires deletion, and an order to delete can be challenged later, but no Eighth Circuit decision has settled the question, so do not physically resist.
6. Note the officer's name and badge number for any future complaint or legal action.
7. File a complaint with the department's internal affairs division if you believe your rights were violated.

Legal Remedies

If police unlawfully interfere with your recording, you may have several legal remedies:

• Section 1983 civil rights lawsuit against the officer or department for violating your First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (note: in the Eighth Circuit, qualified immunity may shield individual officers because the right to record has not been clearly established -- Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023))
• State tort claims for conversion (if equipment was seized), assault, or false imprisonment
• Internal affairs complaints with the police department
• Complaints to the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST)

Law Enforcement Wiretapping Authority

Court-Ordered Interception

Minn. Stat. Chapter 626A provides the framework for law enforcement interception of wire, oral, and electronic communications. Law enforcement must obtain a court order before conducting wiretapping or electronic surveillance. The application for an interception order must demonstrate:

• Probable cause that a specified crime has been, is being, or will be committed
• Normal investigative techniques have been tried and failed, or reasonably appear unlikely to succeed
• The communications to be intercepted are related to the criminal activity
• The surveillance will be conducted to minimize the interception of unrelated communications

Emergency Exceptions

Under Minn. Stat. Section 626A.065, an officer specially designated by the attorney general or a county attorney may intercept before a warrant issues only in an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious physical injury, and only after getting a judge's approval, which may be given orally. An application for a warrant must be made within 36 hours. Minnesota has no organized-crime or national-security emergency ground like the federal one.

Pen Registers and Trap Devices

Law enforcement can also use pen registers and trap and trace devices under Minn. Stat. Section 626A.35 with a court order. These devices capture the phone numbers of incoming and outgoing calls but do not record the content of communications.

Recording Government Meetings

Minnesota's Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. Chapter 13D, requires most local and state agency meetings to be open to the public, but it does not expressly address whether attendees may record, and it does not bar a public body from limiting recording. Legislative proceedings are open under a separate law, Minn. Stat. Section 3.055. Many bodies allow recording of:

• City council meetings
• County board meetings
• School board meetings
• State legislative proceedings
• Public hearings and comment sessions
• Town hall meetings

Check the body's meeting rules before you record, since practices vary and some bodies set rules about where recording equipment can be placed.

More Minnesota Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to Minnesota Recording Laws

More Minnesota Recording Topics

• Minnesota Biometric Privacy Laws
• Surveillance Camera Laws

More Minnesota Laws

• Minnesota AI Meeting Recording Laws
• Minnesota Dashcam Laws
• Minnesota Data Privacy Laws
• Minnesota Deepfake Laws
• Minnesota Employee Monitoring Laws
• Minnesota GPS Tracking Laws
• Minnesota Police Bodycam Laws
• Minnesota Smart Glasses Recording Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record police officers in Minnesota?

Generally yes. No Minnesota law bars filming officers doing their jobs in public, and most federal circuits protect it under the First Amendment, but the Eighth Circuit, which covers Minnesota, has not decided the question and has held the right was not clearly established in 2015. You can film traffic stops, arrests, and other police activity from a distance without interfering. Minnesota's one-party consent law also allows you to record your own conversations with officers without informing them.

Can police confiscate my phone or camera in Minnesota?

Police may hold a phone they believe contains evidence while they seek a warrant, but under Riley v. California (2014) they generally need a warrant to search its contents. Holding it for a long time without probable cause can be an unreasonable seizure; in Robbins v. City of Des Moines (2021) the Eighth Circuit denied officers immunity for keeping a man's phone and camera. No Minnesota law requires you to delete a recording, and whether an officer may order deletion has not been settled in the Eighth Circuit.

Are Minnesota police required to wear body cameras?

Minnesota does not mandate body cameras statewide, but Minn. Stat. Section 626.8473 requires any agency that uses body cameras to adopt a written policy with public input and post the policy on its website. Many Minnesota law enforcement agencies have adopted body camera programs.

Can I get body camera footage in Minnesota?

Yes. Body camera footage is classified under Minn. Stat. Section 13.825, the Government Data Practices Act. The default classification is private or nonpublic data; footage becomes public if it documents a firearm discharge that requires notice or a use of force that results in substantial bodily harm, if a subject of the recording asks for it to be made public, or if it qualifies as public personnel data. When someone dies from police use of force, next of kin may inspect the footage within five days of asking, and the agency must generally release it within 14 days unless it says in writing that release would interfere with an ongoing investigation. You can submit a data request to the law enforcement agency for footage that is public.

What happens if I interfere with police while recording in Minnesota?

Interfering with police operations can result in charges under Minn. Stat. Section 609.50 for obstructing legal process. That is a misdemeanor (up to 90 days and $1,000) in most cases, a gross misdemeanor (up to 364 days and $3,000) if it involves force or a threat of force, and a felony (up to 5 years and $10,000) if it risks or causes death, substantial bodily harm, or serious property damage. You must maintain a safe distance and follow lawful orders while recording.