Alaska Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules for Landline, Cell, and VoIP (2026)

In Alaska, any participant in a phone call may record it without notifying the other parties. AS 42.20.310 prohibits only non-participant interception. In Palmer v. State, the Alaska Supreme Court read AS 11.60.290, the eavesdropping statute then in force, as aimed at third-party eavesdropping and not at a participant who records the conversation.

Alaska's one-party consent law makes it straightforward to record phone calls. Under AS 42.20.310, you can record any phone call you participate in without telling the other person. The statute applies to all forms of telephone communication, from traditional landlines to modern VoIP platforms.

This page covers the specific rules for recording phone calls in Alaska, including cell phone calls, landline calls, VoIP and video calls, interstate considerations, business call recording, and the federal regulations that may also apply.

Alaska's One-Party Consent Rule for Phone Calls

The Basic Rule

Under AS 42.20.310, it is illegal to use an eavesdropping device to hear or record an oral conversation without the consent of a party to the conversation. The statute defines "eavesdropping device" as any device capable of hearing or recording an oral conversation "whether such conversation is conducted in person, by telephone, or by any other means."

Because the statute requires consent from only "a party" (singular), you satisfy the requirement by consenting to the recording of your own call. No notification, announcement, or beep tone is required under Alaska law.

What Types of Calls Are Covered?

The one-party consent rule applies to all forms of telephone communication:

• Landline calls (traditional wired phone service)
• Cell phone calls (all cellular carriers)
• VoIP calls (Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, WhatsApp calls, FaceTime Audio)
• Video calls with audio (the audio portion falls under the eavesdropping statute)
• Satellite phone calls (commonly used in remote Alaska)
• Voice messages and voicemail recording

The Palmer v. State Foundation

The Alaska Supreme Court's decision in Palmer v. State, 604 P.2d 1106, 1108 n.5 (Alaska 1979), held that the eavesdropping statute then in force, AS 11.60.290, was intended to prohibit third-party eavesdropping and did not apply where one of the participants recorded the conversation.

Recording Cell Phone Calls in Alaska

Using Built-In Recording Features

Many smartphones now include native call recording features or support third-party recording apps. Using these tools to record your own calls is legal in Alaska. Popular methods include:

• Android native recording: Many Android phones offer built-in call recording in the Phone app
• Third-party apps: Apps available on both iOS and Android platforms
• External recorders: Devices that connect to your phone's audio jack or Bluetooth
• Speaker phone with separate recorder: Placing the call on speaker and using a standalone recorder

The recording method does not affect the legal analysis. As long as you are a participant in the call, the recording is legal under Alaska law.

Recording Texts vs. Calls

The eavesdropping statute specifically addresses "oral conversation." Text messages, emails, and other written communications are not covered by AS 42.20.310. Screenshots and saved copies of text conversations involve different legal considerations, primarily around digital privacy and electronic communications law.

Interstate Phone Call Recording

The Complexity of Cross-Border Calls

Alaska's one-party consent rule applies clearly when both parties are in Alaska. Complications arise when you call someone in another state with different consent requirements.

Two-Party Consent States to Watch

If you are in Alaska calling someone in one of these all-party consent states, that state's law may apply:

Which State's Law Controls?

There is no uniform federal rule determining which state's recording law applies to interstate calls. Courts have taken different approaches:

• Some courts apply the law of the state where the recording occurs (Alaska, in this scenario)
• Other courts apply the law of the state where the recorded party is located (the other state)
• California's Supreme Court held in Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 39 Cal.4th 95 (2006), that an out-of-state business recording calls with clients in California is subject to California's all-party rule going forward, though it declined to award damages for the business's past recordings, so recording a call with someone in California can expose you to California law even if you record from Alaska

The safest approach for interstate calls is to inform all parties that the call is being recorded. This complies with the strictest consent requirements and eliminates any ambiguity. If you want to skip the guesswork, run both states through our recording consent checker before you dial.

Federal Wiretap Act

The federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. Section 2511) provides a baseline one-party consent standard. Under federal law, recording a phone call is legal when one party consents. However, federal law sets a minimum, not a ceiling. States may be stricter, and a recording must comply with both federal and state law.

Business Phone Call Recording

Why Businesses Record Calls

Alaska businesses commonly record phone calls for:

• Quality assurance and training: Reviewing calls to improve customer service
• Compliance documentation: Creating records of regulatory or financial transactions
• Dispute resolution: Preserving evidence of what was agreed upon during calls
• Security purposes: Monitoring for threats or fraud
• Performance evaluation: Assessing employee phone skills

Methods for Obtaining Consent

While Alaska law does not require businesses to obtain consent from the other party (because the business representative on the call satisfies one-party consent), many businesses choose to provide notice anyway. The FCC states that it has no rules on recording telephone conversations by individuals; the rules come from federal and state wiretap law. Common notice methods include:

• Pre-recorded announcement: "This call may be recorded for quality assurance and training purposes." This is the most common method and provides the best legal protection for interstate calls.
• Verbal disclosure by the representative: The employee informs the caller at the start of the conversation that it is being recorded.
• Beep tone: A periodic audible tone during the call indicates recording is in progress. No current FCC rule requires or approves this method (the old beep-tone rule was removed in 2017), and it gives less clear notice than a verbal announcement.
• Written consent: Advance written consent in contracts or terms of service.

Best Practices for Business Compliance

Businesses operating in Alaska should consider these practices:

1. Use a pre-recorded announcement for all incoming and outgoing calls, even though Alaska does not require it. This protects against liability when callers are in two-party consent states.
2. Train employees on the company's call recording policy and disclosure procedures.
3. Maintain recordings securely with appropriate access controls.
4. Establish a retention policy that defines how long recordings are kept and when they are deleted.
5. Document consent by keeping a record of when and how consent was obtained for each recorded call.

Recording VoIP and Video Calls

Platform-Specific Considerations

Modern communication platforms have their own recording features and terms of service:

• Zoom: Provides built-in recording with a notification indicator visible to all participants. You can also use external recording without the platform's built-in feature.
• Microsoft Teams: Similar built-in recording with participant notification.
• Google Meet: Recording available for certain account types with notification.
• WhatsApp/FaceTime: No built-in recording, but external tools can capture the audio.

Under Alaska law, you can record any of these calls without using the platform's built-in feature and without notifying other participants. However, if participants are in two-party consent states, their state's law may apply.

Satellite Phone Calls

Alaska's vast wilderness and remote communities make satellite phones common in the state. The same one-party consent rule applies to satellite phone calls. If you are a participant, you can record the call without informing the other party.

Penalties for Illegal Phone Call Recording

Illegally recording a phone call in Alaska (such as tapping someone else's phone line without any participant's consent) is a Class A misdemeanor under AS 42.20.330:

Federal penalties under the Wiretap Act can be more severe: up to 5 years in federal prison and fines under 18 U.S.C. Section 2511.

Civil liability is also significant. Under 18 U.S.C. Section 2520, victims can recover:

• Actual damages plus profits gained from the illegal recording, or statutory damages of the greater of $100 a day or $10,000, at the court's discretion
• Punitive damages
• Reasonable attorney's fees

Using Phone Call Recordings as Evidence

Legally recorded phone calls are generally admissible as evidence in Alaska courts. To maximize the evidentiary value:

• Preserve the original recording without any edits or modifications
• Document the recording details: date, time, participants, and the device used
• Be prepared to authenticate the recording by testifying about its creation and chain of custody
• Anticipate hearsay objections: The recorded statements may be subject to hearsay rules, though many exceptions apply (party-opponent statements, excited utterances, present sense impressions)

Illegally obtained recordings are generally excluded from criminal proceedings and may be excluded from civil cases as well.

SB 85: The Failed All-Party Consent Bill

Senate Bill 85 would have converted Alaska from a one-party consent state to an all-party consent state. Had it passed, recording phone calls in Alaska would have changed dramatically:

• You would need consent from all parties before recording any call
• Secretly recording a phone call would become illegal even if you are a participant
• Businesses would need to obtain explicit consent from every person on the call
• Law enforcement would be exempt from the all-party requirement

SB 85 never moved past the Senate Labor and Commerce Committee after its February 5, 2025 referral, and the 2026 regular session ended May 20, 2026 with no action on it. Alaska remains a one-party state.

Practical Tips for Recording Phone Calls in Alaska

1. Test your recording setup before an important call. Make sure the audio is clear and both sides of the conversation are captured.
2. Use a reliable recording method. Built-in phone features and dedicated recording apps tend to produce better quality than external devices.
3. Back up your recordings to a secure cloud service or external storage.
4. For interstate calls, inform the other party. A simple statement like "I'd like to record this call for my records" eliminates any legal ambiguity.
5. Keep a call log with recording metadata: date, time, duration, participants, and the purpose of the call.

More Alaska Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to Alaska Recording Laws

More Alaska Recording Topics

• Alaska Biometric Privacy Laws
• Surveillance Camera Laws

More Alaska Laws

• Alaska AI Meeting Recording Laws
• Alaska Dashcam Laws
• Alaska Data Privacy Laws
• Alaska Deepfake Laws
• Alaska Employee Monitoring Laws
• Alaska GPS Tracking Laws
• Alaska Police Bodycam Laws
• Alaska Smart Glasses Recording Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record a phone call in Alaska without telling the other person?

Yes. Alaska is a one-party consent state under AS 42.20.310. As a participant in the phone call, you can record it without informing or obtaining consent from the other person. This applies to landline, cell phone, VoIP, and video calls.

Can I record a Zoom or Teams call in Alaska?

Yes. Alaska's one-party consent law applies to VoIP and video calls. You can record a Zoom, Teams, or similar call without notifying other participants, as long as you are a participant yourself. If other participants are in two-party consent states, their state's law may also apply.

What if I call someone in California from Alaska?

California is an all-party consent state, and in Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney (2006) the California Supreme Court held that out-of-state businesses recording calls with Californians are subject to California law going forward (it declined damages for the past recordings in that case), so California law may reach your call even though you record from Alaska. The safest approach is to inform the California resident that the call is being recorded and obtain their consent.

Can a business record customer calls in Alaska?

Yes. Under one-party consent, a business representative on the call satisfies the consent requirement. However, businesses are strongly advised to use a pre-recorded announcement notifying callers that the call may be recorded. This protects against liability when callers are in all-party consent states. The FCC has no rules on call recording; the requirements come from federal and state wiretap law.

Is it illegal to tap someone else's phone in Alaska?

Yes. Recording phone calls between other people without any participant's consent is illegal under both AS 42.20.310 (Class A misdemeanor, up to 1 year in jail and $25,000 fine) and the federal Wiretap Act (up to 5 years in federal prison). Victims can also sue under 18 U.S.C. 2520, where a court may award actual damages or statutory damages of the greater of $100 a day or $10,000.