Illinois
Illinois Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Illinois allows video-only surveillance cameras on your own property, but surreptitiously recording audio without consent from every party violates the Eavesdropping Act (720 ILCS 5/14-2) and is a Class 4 felony. Hidden cameras in bathrooms, bedrooms, and changing rooms are separately prohibited under 720 ILCS 5/26-4.
Illinois has some of the strictest surveillance and privacy laws in the country. If you plan to install security cameras at home, at your business, or anywhere else in the state, you need to understand how multiple overlapping statutes apply to your situation. Getting it wrong can mean felony charges, civil lawsuits, or both.
This guide covers the key Illinois laws that affect surveillance cameras, including rules for audio recording, hidden cameras, workplace monitoring, neighbor disputes, facial recognition technology, and more.
Illinois Eavesdropping Act: The All-Party Consent Rule
The single most important law affecting surveillance cameras in Illinois is the Eavesdropping Act, found at 720 ILCS 5/14-2. Illinois is an all-party consent state for audio recording. This means every person whose voice is captured must know about and agree to the recording if the conversation is private.
Under 720 ILCS 5/14-2, it is illegal to use an eavesdropping device, in a surreptitious manner, to overhear, transmit, or record any private conversation without the consent of all parties involved. The phrase "in a surreptitious manner" appears in both 14-2(a)(1) and 14-2(a)(2), and it is an element of the offense rather than a description of it. The General Assembly wrote that element into the statute in Public Act 98-1142, effective December 30, 2014, when it rewrote the eavesdropping law. In practice it means a recording made openly, by a device that is evident to the people being recorded, is a materially weaker case than a concealed one, even where nobody has expressly consented.
The definition of a "private conversation" is not in 14-2. It sits one section earlier, in 720 ILCS 5/14-1(d), which defines it as any oral communication between 2 or more persons, whether in person or transmitted between the parties by wire or other means, when one or more of the parties intended the communication to be of a private nature under circumstances reasonably justifying that expectation.
What This Means for Security Cameras
If your surveillance camera records audio, you are subject to the Eavesdropping Act. A camera that captures video only does not trigger this law. Once you enable a microphone, two things have to be true before a recording is criminal under 14-2: it has to capture a private conversation, and it has to be made in a surreptitious manner.
That second element matters for cameras that are mounted in plain sight and signposted, because an openly operating, clearly disclosed camera is difficult to characterize as surreptitious. Visibility is not a safe harbor spelled out in the statute, though, and no Illinois court has drawn a bright line around it. Consent from every party whose voice may be captured remains the only reliable protection.
This applies to home security cameras, doorbell cameras with microphones, baby monitors that record, workplace surveillance systems, and any other device capable of capturing sound.
Penalties for Eavesdropping Violations
A first-time violation of 720 ILCS 5/14-2 is a Class 4 felony under 720 ILCS 5/14-4. A Class 4 felony carries a potential sentence of one to three years in state prison and fines up to $25,000.
Repeat offenses or recordings involving certain government officials can elevate the charge to a Class 3 or Class 2 felony, with longer prison terms. The penalties increase significantly based on the circumstances of the violation.
| Offense Level | Prison Term | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Class 4 felony (first offense) | 1 to 3 years | $25,000 |
| Class 3 felony (repeat or aggravated) | 2 to 5 years | $25,000 |
| Class 2 felony (most serious) | 3 to 7 years | $25,000 |
Exceptions to the Eavesdropping Act
720 ILCS 5/14-3 lists several exceptions to the eavesdropping law. These include:
- Law enforcement officers acting within their official duties with proper authorization
- Recordings made during an ongoing hostage or barricade situation when necessary to protect public safety
- Recordings of public meetings governed by the Illinois Open Meetings Act
- Conversations where all parties have given consent
There is no blanket exception for home security cameras. If your home camera secretly records audio and captures private conversations of guests, delivery workers, or passersby, you could face criminal liability unless those individuals have consented.
Home Security Camera Laws in Illinois
Illinois does not have a single statute that governs residential security cameras. Instead, several laws work together to define what homeowners can and cannot do.

Video Recording on Your Property
Video-only surveillance on your own property is generally lawful in Illinois. You can install exterior cameras on your home to monitor your driveway, front door, garage, and yard. Interior cameras in common areas of your own home (such as living rooms, kitchens, and hallways) are also legal.
The key legal boundary is the reasonable expectation of privacy. You cannot place cameras in areas where anyone, including household members and guests, would reasonably expect privacy. Bathrooms, guest bedrooms, and changing areas are always off-limits.
Audio Recording at Home
Many modern security cameras and doorbell cameras come with built-in microphones. Under the Illinois Eavesdropping Act (720 ILCS 5/14-2), secretly recording audio of private conversations on your property still requires consent from all parties.
If you use a doorbell camera that records audio, post a visible sign notifying visitors that audio and video recording is in progress. A sign alone may not satisfy the legal requirement for "consent," but it bears on both elements of the offense. It makes the recording harder to characterize as surreptitious, and it supports an argument that a visitor who proceeds anyway has impliedly consented. Neither point is a guarantee. Disabling the microphone is the only step that takes the Eavesdropping Act out of the picture entirely.
The Protecting Household Privacy Act
Illinois enacted the Protecting Household Privacy Act (5 ILCS 855), which took effect on January 1, 2022. This law restricts law enforcement access to data from internet-connected household devices, including smart home cameras, voice assistants, and similar connected technology.
Under this law, law enforcement agencies generally cannot obtain data from your household electronic devices, or direct a third party to provide such data, without first obtaining a warrant. Exceptions exist for emergency situations, calls for emergency services, or when the device owner provides lawful consent.
If household electronic data is obtained through a warrant or emergency exception, the law requires it to be destroyed within 60 days unless there is reasonable suspicion that it contains evidence of criminal activity or is relevant to an ongoing investigation.
Hidden Camera Laws in Illinois
Illinois law draws a firm line on hidden cameras. Under 720 ILCS 5/26-4, it is unlawful to knowingly make a video recording or transmit live video of another person without that person's consent in certain protected locations.
Where Hidden Cameras Are Always Illegal
The statute specifically prohibits hidden cameras in:
- Restrooms
- Tanning beds and tanning salons
- Locker rooms and changing rooms
- Hotel bedrooms
- Another person's residence (without the resident's consent)
For purposes of this law, "residence" includes rental dwellings but does not include stairwells, corridors, laundry facilities, or other common areas where the general public has access.
Penalties for Unauthorized Video Recording
The penalty under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 depends on which subsection was violated, and the difference is large. Subsection (d) assigns the offense classes:
| Conduct | Subsection | Offense class |
|---|---|---|
| Recording or transmitting live video of a person in a restroom, tanning bed, tanning salon, locker room, changing room, or hotel bedroom | (a) | Class 4 felony |
| Recording or transmitting live video of a person in that person's residence | (a-5) | Class 4 felony |
| Doing the same from outside the residence with a remote device | (a-6) | Class 4 felony |
| Recording another person's intimate parts without consent | (a-10) | Class 4 felony |
| Placing a device with intent to record in a restroom, tanning bed, tanning salon, locker room, changing room, or hotel bedroom | (a-15) | Class A misdemeanor |
| Placing a device with intent to record a person in that person's residence | (a-20) | Class A misdemeanor |
| Disseminating a recording known to have been made in violation of the section | (a-25) | Class 3 felony |
That split matters for hidden cameras specifically. Under 26-4(d)(1), installing the device is a Class A misdemeanor, which carries a determinate jail term of less than one year and a fine of up to $2,500. Using it to actually record or transmit a person is the Class 4 felony under 26-4(d)(2), punishable by one to three years in prison and fines up to $25,000.
An extended term of three to six years exists for Class 4 felonies generally under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-45, but it is not automatic and 26-4 contains no repeat-offense enhancement of its own. An extended term requires a statutory aggravating factor under 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b), and a second conviction under 26-4 does not by itself supply one.
Two enhancements in the statute do turn on the victim or the offender. Under 26-4(d)(4), a violation of (a), (a-5), (a-6), (a-10), (a-15) or (a-20) becomes a Class 3 felony, carrying two to five years, if the victim is under 18 years of age or the offender is required to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act. Under 26-4(d)(5), dissemination under (a-25) becomes a Class 2 felony in those same circumstances, carrying three to seven years.
Peeping and Disorderly Conduct
Separate from the unauthorized video recording statute, Illinois addresses traditional "peeping tom" behavior in its disorderly conduct statute, 720 ILCS 5/26-1. The offense is disorderly conduct, not a distinct invasion-of-privacy crime, and 26-1(a)(11) has two elements that are easy to miss.
A person commits the offense when he or she "[e]nters upon the property of another and for a lewd or unlawful purpose deliberately looks into a dwelling on the property through any window or other opening in it." The offender has to actually enter the other person's property, so looking in from a public sidewalk or from one's own yard is not covered by this provision, and the looking has to be for a lewd or unlawful purpose.
A violation of 26-1(a)(11) is a Class A misdemeanor, carrying a jail term of less than one year and fines up to $2,500. Under 26-1(b), a third or subsequent violation of subsection (a)(11) is a Class 4 felony.
Nanny Cams in Illinois
Using a hidden camera to monitor a nanny, babysitter, or other caregiver is legal in Illinois under certain conditions.
Video-Only Nanny Cams Are Legal
Illinois law permits video-only nanny cams placed in common areas of your home. Parents can use these cameras to monitor their children's safety and the caregiver's conduct without notifying the caregiver, provided the cameras are not placed in private areas like bathrooms or the caregiver's bedroom (if the caregiver lives in the home).
Audio Recording Requires Consent
Because Illinois is an all-party consent state, a nanny cam that secretly records the caregiver's private conversations exposes you to felony liability under the Eavesdropping Act. The safe course is to get the nanny or babysitter to sign a written acknowledgment that audio recording is taking place before work begins.
Disclosing the camera in writing does double duty here. It documents consent, and a camera the caregiver has been told about in writing is hard to describe as being used in a surreptitious manner, which is a required element of the offense under 14-2.
Best Practices for Nanny Cam Use
- Use video-only cameras or disable the microphone entirely
- Place cameras only in common areas (living room, kitchen, play areas)
- Never place cameras in bathrooms, a live-in caregiver's bedroom, or other private spaces
- If audio is necessary, obtain written consent before the caregiver begins work
- Consider informing the caregiver about video cameras as a matter of professional courtesy, even though it is not legally required for video-only recording
Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws
Illinois employers have the right to use surveillance cameras in the workplace, but the law imposes meaningful limits on where and how cameras can be used.
Where Employers Can Place Cameras
Employers may install video surveillance cameras in areas where employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Common lawful locations include:
- Entrances and exits
- Hallways and corridors
- Warehouses and production floors
- Parking lots
- Cash register and point-of-sale areas
- Common break rooms (video only)
Where Cameras Are Prohibited
Cameras are never permitted in:
- Restrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Private offices used by a single employee (without notice)
- Nursing or lactation rooms
Audio Recording in the Workplace
The Illinois Eavesdropping Act applies fully to the workplace. An employer who covertly records employees' private conversations without the consent of everyone whose voice is captured can be charged with a Class 4 felony, and owning the building does not change that.
Visibility does matter, though, because 14-2 reaches only an eavesdropping device used "in a surreptitious manner." Audio-capable cameras that are openly mounted, disclosed in a written policy, and signposted at the areas they cover are a much weaker case on that element than concealed microphones. Employers should not treat visible placement as permission. The reliable approach is to disable audio in employee work areas, or to obtain written consent from employees before recording sound.
Employee Notification
While Illinois does not have a specific statute requiring employers to notify employees about video-only surveillance, providing written notice is strongly recommended. Clear notification reduces the risk of privacy-related claims, helps establish that employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in monitored areas, and bears directly on the surreptitious-manner element if audio is ever captured.
Illinois has not enacted a workplace surveillance notification statute, so this remains a best practice rather than a legal requirement. Employers should monitor legislative developments in this area.
Neighbor Security Camera Disputes
Disputes between neighbors over security camera placement are increasingly common in Illinois. While no single Illinois statute addresses this situation directly, several legal principles apply.
What Is Allowed
You may point security cameras at areas of your own property, including your front yard, driveway, sidewalk, and the public street. If a neighbor's property happens to appear incidentally in the frame (for example, part of their driveway or the edge of their yard), this is generally acceptable as long as the primary purpose is monitoring your own property.
What Crosses the Line
Deliberately aiming a camera at a neighbor's home, especially toward windows, a fenced backyard, or other areas where the neighbor has a reasonable expectation of privacy, can create legal problems. Under 720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-5), it is unlawful to knowingly make a video recording of another person in that person's residence without consent. Subsection (a-6) addresses this exact scenario directly: it covers a recording of a person inside their residence made from outside it, using a device that records or transmits from a remote location. Both are Class 4 felonies.
A neighbor who feels targeted by surveillance may pursue several legal remedies:
- File a complaint for unauthorized video recording if the camera captures activity inside their home
- Bring a civil nuisance claim if the surveillance is harassing or intentionally intrusive
- Seek an injunction to compel the camera owner to reposition the device
- File an eavesdropping complaint if the camera secretly records audio of private conversations
HOA and Condominium Rules
Homeowners associations and condominium boards in Illinois can adopt rules governing security camera installation in common areas and on the exterior of units. Boards typically have authority to regulate camera placement to protect the privacy interests of all residents.
Common HOA rules include restrictions on where cameras can point, requirements for board approval before installation, and prohibitions on audio recording in common areas. Individual unit owners generally cannot install cameras in shared common areas without board authorization.
BIPA and Facial Recognition on Surveillance Cameras
The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14) creates some of the strongest biometric privacy protections in the United States. BIPA has significant implications for surveillance cameras that use facial recognition technology.
What BIPA Covers
BIPA protects "biometric identifiers," defined to include retina or iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, and scans of hand or face geometry. Facial recognition technology on surveillance cameras falls squarely within this definition because it analyzes and stores face geometry data.
Requirements for Private Entities
Under 740 ILCS 14/15, any private entity that collects biometric information through surveillance cameras must:
- Inform the individual in writing that their biometric data is being collected
- Identify the specific purpose and length of time the data will be stored and used
- Receive a written release from the individual before collecting the data
- Develop a publicly available written policy establishing a retention schedule
- Permanently destroy biometric data when the initial purpose has been satisfied or within three years of the individual's last interaction, whichever comes first
- Store, transmit, and protect biometric data using a reasonable standard of care, at least as protective as the entity's treatment of other confidential information
BIPA Penalties and Enforcement
BIPA provides a private right of action, meaning individuals can sue for violations without waiting for a government agency to act. The damages are substantial:
| Violation Type | Liquidated Damages Per Violation |
|---|---|
| Negligent violation | $1,000 or actual damages (whichever is greater) |
| Intentional or reckless violation | $5,000 or actual damages (whichever is greater) |
In addition to damages, a prevailing party can recover reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, and litigation costs. Courts may also grant injunctive relief.
2024 BIPA Amendment
In August 2024, Illinois amended BIPA through Senate Bill 2979 to address the calculation of damages. The amendment provides that when a private entity collects the same biometric identifier from the same person using the same method in violation of BIPA, it constitutes a single violation rather than multiple violations. This change significantly reduces potential damage awards compared to earlier interpretations that treated each scan as a separate violation.
Practical Impact on Surveillance Systems
Any business or organization in Illinois that uses surveillance cameras with facial recognition features must comply with BIPA. This includes retail stores using facial recognition for loss prevention, employers using face-scan time clocks, property managers using facial recognition access control, and any smart camera system that identifies individuals by their face geometry.
Residential users who operate facial recognition cameras in a personal capacity may fall outside BIPA's scope, as the law applies to "private entities" rather than individuals acting for purely personal purposes. However, the boundaries of this personal use exception have not been fully tested in court.
Drone Surveillance in Illinois
The Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act (725 ILCS 167) restricts the use of drones for surveillance purposes. Under this law, law enforcement agencies generally cannot use drones to gather information without a warrant. Private individuals are also subject to general privacy laws when operating camera-equipped drones.
Flying a drone equipped with a camera over a neighbor's fenced backyard or near their windows could violate both state privacy laws and FAA regulations. The same principles that apply to fixed surveillance cameras regarding reasonable expectations of privacy extend to drone-mounted cameras.
Summary of Key Illinois Surveillance Camera Statutes
| Statute | What It Covers | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| 720 ILCS 5/14-2 (Eavesdropping Act) | Surreptitious audio recording of private conversations | All-party consent required |
| 720 ILCS 5/26-4 | Unauthorized video recording | No recording in private locations without consent |
| 740 ILCS 14 (BIPA) | Biometric data including facial recognition | Written consent and retention policy required |
| 5 ILCS 855 (Protecting Household Privacy Act) | Law enforcement access to smart home data | Warrant generally required |
| 725 ILCS 167 (Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act) | Drone-based surveillance | Warrant required for law enforcement use |
| 720 ILCS 5/26-1 | Peeping, charged as disorderly conduct | Entry onto another's property for a lewd or unlawful purpose |
How to Stay Compliant with Illinois Surveillance Camera Laws
Following these guidelines can help you avoid legal trouble when using surveillance cameras in Illinois:
- Disable audio recording on all outdoor cameras unless you have obtained written consent from every person who may be recorded
- Post visible signage near cameras indicating that video surveillance is in use
- Keep cameras pointed at your own property and avoid capturing views inside neighbors' homes or private areas
- Never place cameras in bathrooms, bedrooms (other than your own), changing areas, or other locations where people expect privacy
- Check BIPA requirements before using any camera system with facial recognition capabilities
- Review HOA rules if you live in a community with a homeowners association
- Consult an Illinois attorney if you are unsure whether your specific camera setup complies with state law
Related Illinois Camera and Privacy Laws
- Illinois Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in Illinois.
- Illinois Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- Illinois Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- Illinois Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in Illinois.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
- HOA Security Camera Rules
- Neighbor Security Camera Laws
- Nanny Cam Laws
- Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws
- Landlord Security Camera Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record audio on my home security camera in Illinois?
Illinois is an all-party consent state under the Eavesdropping Act (720 ILCS 5/14-2). Using an eavesdropping device in a surreptitious manner to record a private conversation without consent from every person being recorded is a Class 4 felony, punishable by one to three years in prison and fines up to $25,000. The surreptitious-manner element means an openly mounted, clearly signposted camera is a weaker case than a concealed one, but that is not a safe harbor written into the statute. If you want to record audio, get written consent from anyone whose voice may be captured. Many homeowners simply disable audio recording on their security cameras to avoid the question.
Are nanny cams legal in Illinois?
Video-only nanny cams placed in common areas of your home (living room, kitchen, play areas) are legal in Illinois. You are not required to tell the caregiver about a video-only camera, though many parents choose to do so. Audio is different: secretly recording a caregiver's private conversations can be charged as a felony under the Eavesdropping Act, so get written consent before enabling a microphone. Cameras placed in bathrooms, a live-in caregiver's private bedroom, or other private areas are always illegal.
Can my neighbor legally point a security camera at my house in Illinois?
A neighbor may capture incidental views of your property if the camera is primarily monitoring their own property. However, deliberately pointing a camera at your windows, into your fenced backyard, or toward other areas where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy can violate Illinois law. Under 720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-5), recording someone inside their residence without consent is a Class 4 felony, and subsection (a-6) covers exactly the neighbor scenario: recording a person inside their residence from outside it using a remote device. You may also have grounds for a civil nuisance claim or seek an injunction to compel the neighbor to reposition the camera.
Does Illinois require employers to notify employees about workplace security cameras?
Illinois does not currently have a specific statute requiring employers to notify workers about video-only surveillance cameras. However, employers cannot place cameras in restrooms, locker rooms, changing areas, or lactation rooms. Covertly recording employees' private conversations without all-party consent can be charged as a felony under the Eavesdropping Act, which reaches an eavesdropping device used in a surreptitious manner. Best practice is to disable audio in work areas and to provide written notice to employees about the location and purpose of all surveillance cameras.
What are the penalties for unauthorized video recording in Illinois?
It depends on the subsection of 720 ILCS 5/26-4 that was violated. Placing a camera in a restroom, tanning bed or salon, locker room, changing room, hotel bedroom, or someone's residence with intent to record is a Class A misdemeanor under 26-4(d)(1). Actually recording or transmitting live video of a person in one of those places, or recording someone's intimate parts, is a Class 4 felony under 26-4(d)(2), carrying one to three years in prison and fines up to $25,000. Disseminating such a recording is a Class 3 felony. If the victim is under 18 or the offender is a registered sex offender, the recording offenses become Class 3 felonies and dissemination becomes a Class 2 felony. Victims may also pursue civil lawsuits, and violations involving biometric data such as facial recognition can trigger BIPA claims with statutory damages of $1,000 to $5,000 per violation.
Updates
Corrected the penalties for unauthorized video recording under 720 ILCS 5/26-4, which vary by subsection (placing a hidden camera is a Class A misdemeanor, recording or transmitting is a Class 4 felony, and dissemination is a Class 3 felony), removed an incorrect repeat-offense enhancement, added the "surreptitious manner" element of the Illinois Eavesdropping Act, restored the missing elements of the peeping provision in 720 ILCS 5/26-1, and replaced official statute links that had gone dead.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 720, Act 5 (Criminal Code of 2012)
§ 26-4Unauthorized video recording and live video transmissionIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person without that person's consent in a restroom, tanning bed, tanning salon, locker room, changing room, or hotel bedroom. (a-5) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person in that other person's residence without that person's consent. (a-6) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person in that other person's residence without that person's consent when the recording or transmission is made outside that person's residence by use of an audio or video device that records or transmits from a remote location. (a-10) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person's intimate parts for the purpose of viewing the body of or the undergarments worn by that other person without that person's consent.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. McCavitt (Illinois Supreme Court 2021, 452 Ill. Dec. 456)“…o Recording/Live Video Transmission in violation of 720 ILCS 5/26-4,” and the warrant authorized th…”
- People v. Van Syckle (Appellate Court of Illinois 2020, 2019 IL App (1st) 181410)“…in violation of section 26-4(a) of the Criminal Code (720 ILCS 5/26-4(a) (West 2014)). Defendant filed a…”
- People v. Maillet (Appellate Court of Illinois 2019, 2019 IL App (2d) 161114)“…of section 26-4(a-5) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-5) (West 2012)). Count II alleged tha…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent Rules, Illinois Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Camera Rules and Privacy Rights (2026), Illinois Video Recording Laws: Consent, BIPA, and Surveillance Rules (2026)
§ 14-2Elements of the offense; affirmative defenseIn forcecited in 63 of our articles
(a) A person commits eavesdropping when he or she knowingly and intentionally: (1) Uses an eavesdropping device, in a surreptitious manner, for the purpose of overhearing, transmitting, or recording all or any part of any private conversation to which he or she is not a party unless he or she does so with the consent of all of the parties to the private conversation; (2) Uses an eavesdropping device, in a surreptitious manner, for the purpose of transmitting or recording all or any part of any private conversation to which he or she is a party unless he or she does so with the consent of all other parties to the private conversation; (3) Intercepts, records, or transcribes, in a surreptitious manner, any private electronic communication to which he or she is not a party unless he or she does so with the consent of all parties to the private electronic communication; (4) Manufactures, assembles, distributes, or possesses any electronic, mechanical, eavesdropping, or other device knowing that or having reason to know that the design of the device renders it primarily useful for the purpose of the surreptitious overhearing, transmitting, or recording of private conversations or the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 92 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Melongo (Illinois Supreme Court 2014, 2014 IL 114852)“…ations of section 14-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/14-2 (West 2008)), which defines the offense…”
- People v. Smith (Appellate Court of Illinois 2025, 2025 IL App (1st) 220116)“…ropping violated section 14-2 of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/14-2 (West 2014)) and that then State’s Att…”
- Cook Au Vin, LLC v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. (Appellate Court of Illinois 2023, 226 N.E.3d 694)“…onversation by one who is not a party to the conversation. 720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(1) (West 2020). In enacting the stat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Audio Recording Laws: All-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Illinois Dashcam Laws: Audio Rules, Placement, and Legal Use (2026), Illinois Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent Rules (2026)
§ 14-3ExemptionsIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
The following activities shall be exempt from the provisions of this Article: (a) Listening to radio, wireless electronic communications, and television communications of any sort where the same are publicly made; (b) Hearing conversation when heard by employees of any common carrier by wire incidental to the normal course of their employment in the operation, maintenance or repair of the equipment of such common carrier by wire so long as no information obtained thereby is used or divulged by the hearer; (c) Any broadcast by radio, television or otherwise whether it be a broadcast or recorded for the purpose of later broadcasts of any function where the public is in attendance and the conversations are overheard incidental to the main purpose for which such broadcasts are then being made; (d) Recording or listening with the aid of any device to any emergency communication made in the normal course of operations by any federal, state or local law enforcement agency or institutions dealing in emergency services, including, but not limited to, hospitals, clinics, ambulance services, fire fighting agencies, any public utility, emergency repair facility, civilian defense establishment…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 32 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Brindley (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2017 IL App (5th) 160189)“…3(q)(1) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Criminal Code) (720 ILCS 5/14-3(q)(1) (West 2012)). The circuit co…”
- People v. Graves (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 2012 IL App (4th) 110536)“…re exempt from the provisions of the eavesdropping statute. 720 ILCS 5/14-3 (West 2008). At the time of defendant's…”
- People v. Wachholtz (Appellate Court of Illinois 2013, 988 N.E.2d 765)“…tion 14-3(h-15) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/14-3(h-15) (West 2010)) when they destroyed…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Phone Call Recording Laws: All-Party Consent Rules (2026), Illinois Workplace Recording Laws: Employee Rights, BIPA, and Employer Rules (2026)
§ 14-4SentenceIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Eavesdropping, for a first offense, is a Class 4 felony and, for a second or subsequent offense, is a Class 3 felony. (b) The eavesdropping of an oral conversation or an electronic communication of any law enforcement officer, State's Attorney, Assistant State's Attorney, the Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General, or a judge, while in the performance of his or her official duties, if not authorized by this Article or proper court order, is a Class 3 felony, and for a second or subsequent offense, is a Class 2 felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Jenkins (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 2012 IL App (2d) 91168)“…y if the officer was engaged in his or her official duties. 720 ILCS 5/14-4(b) (West 2008). A person commits eavesd…”
- Morris v. Ameritech Illinois (Appellate Court of Illinois 2003)“…acts of high managerial agents. Eavesdropping is a felony. 720 ILCS 5/14-4 (West 1994). Therefore, Ameritech can…”
- Acuff v. IBP, Inc. (District Court, C.D. Illinois 1999, 65 F. Supp. 2d 866)“…4. Illinois’ Eavesdropping Statute, 720 ILCS 5/14-2 and 720 ILCS 5/14-4; and 5. Illinois Constitution Ar…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Protections (2026), Illinois School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights (2026), Illinois Smart Glasses Recording Laws: Audio, BIPA & Consent
§ 26-1Disorderly conductIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) A person commits disorderly conduct when he or she knowingly: (1) Does any act in such unreasonable manner as to alarm or disturb another and to provoke a breach of the peace; (2) Transmits or causes to be transmitted in any manner to the fire department of any city, town, village or fire protection district a false alarm of fire, knowing at the time of the transmission that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the fire exists; (3) Transmits or causes to be transmitted in any manner to another a false alarm to the effect that a bomb or other explosive of any nature or a container holding poison gas, a deadly biological or chemical contaminant, or radioactive substance is concealed in a place where its explosion or release would endanger human life, knowing at the time of the transmission that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the bomb, explosive or a container holding poison gas, a deadly biological or chemical contaminant, or radioactive substance is concealed in the place; (3.5) Transmits or causes to be transmitted in any manner a threat of destruction of a school building or school property, or a threat of violence, death, or bodily harm directed…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 148 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Swenson (Illinois Supreme Court 2020, 450 Ill. Dec. 116)“…or disturb another and to provoke a breach of the peace[.]” 720 ILCS 5/26-1(a)(1) (West 2014). ¶ 16 Defendan…”
- People v. Sypien (Illinois Supreme Court 2001, 198 Ill. 2d 334)“…believing that such an offense * * * has been committed[.]" 720 ILCS 5/26-1(a)(4) (West 1998). Section 15 of Publ…”
- People v. McLENNON (Appellate Court of Illinois 2011, 957 N.E.2d 1241)“…olation of section 26-1(a)(1) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/26-1(a)(1) (West 2008)). Defendant was sente…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Disorderly Conduct and Criminal Trespass Laws (2026), Illinois Noise Laws: Quiet Hours, Noise Complaints and Fines
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 740, Act 14 (Biometric Information Privacy Act)
§ 15Retention; collection; disclosure; destructionIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
(a) A private entity in possession of biometric identifiers or biometric information must develop a written policy, made available to the public, establishing a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information when the initial purpose for collecting or obtaining such identifiers or information has been satisfied or within 3 years of the individual's last interaction with the private entity, whichever occurs first. Absent a valid warrant or subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, a private entity in possession of biometric identifiers or biometric information must comply with its established retention schedule and destruction guidelines.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 208 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc. (Illinois Supreme Court 2023, 466 Ill. Dec. 85)“…15(d) of the Biometric Information Privacy Act (Act) (740 ILCS 14/15(b), (d) (West 2018)) in an action…”
- Tims v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc. (Illinois Supreme Court 2023, 466 Ill. Dec. 12)“…15(a) of the Biometric Information Privacy Act (Act) (740 ILCS 14/15(a) (West 2018)), providing for the rete…”
- Watson v. Legacy Healthcare Financial Services, LLC (Appellate Court of Illinois 2021, 458 Ill. Dec. 267)“…d, and (4) to obtain his or her written consent. 740 ILCS 14/15(a), (b) (West 2018). The complaint alle…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oklahoma Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Illinois AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), BIPA Explained: Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14)
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 5, Act 855 (Protecting Household Privacy Act)
§ 10Prohibited use of household electronic dataIn force
Except as provided in Section 15, a law enforcement agency shall not obtain household electronic data or direct the acquisition of household electronic data from a private third party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 725, Act 167 (Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act)
§ 10Prohibited use of dronesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as provided in Section 15, a law enforcement agency may not use a drone to gather information.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Also relied on in: Illinois Drone Laws (2026): Police Warrants, Privacy, and Hunting
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 730, Act 5 (Unified Code of Corrections)
§ 5-4.5-45CLASS 4 FELONIES; SENTENCEIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
For a Class 4 felony: (a) TERM. The sentence of imprisonment shall be a determinate sentence of not less than one year and not more than 3 years. The sentence of imprisonment for an extended term Class 4 felony, as provided in Section 5-8-2 (730 ILCS 5/5-8-2), shall be a term not less than 3 years and not more than 6 years. (b) PERIODIC IMPRISONMENT. A sentence of periodic imprisonment shall be for a definite term of up to 18 months, except as otherwise provided in Section 5-5-3 or 5-7-1 (730 ILCS 5/5-5-3 or 5/5-7-1). (c) IMPACT INCARCERATION. See Sections 5-8-1.1 and 5-8-1.2 (730 ILCS 5/5-8-1.1 and 5/5-8-1.2) concerning eligibility for the impact incarceration program or the county impact incarceration program. (d) PROBATION; CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE. Except as provided in Section 5-5-3 or 5-6-2 (730 ILCS 5/5-5-3 or 5/5-6-2), the period of probation or conditional discharge shall not exceed 30 months. The court shall specify the conditions of probation or conditional discharge as set forth in Section 5-6-3 (730 ILCS 5/5-6-3). (e) FINE. Fines may be imposed as provided in Section 5-4.5-50(b) (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-50(b)). (f) RESTITUTION.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 112 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Cisco (Appellate Court of Illinois 2019, 2019 IL App (4th) 160515)“…Class 4 felony is one to three years’ imprisonment. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-45(a) (West 2014). However, if a defendant…”
- People v. Mosley (Illinois Supreme Court 2015, 2015 IL 115872)“…ation or conditional discharge shall not exceed 30 months.” 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-45(a), (d) (West 2012).…”
- People v. Busse (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2016 IL App (1st) 142941)“…se’s sentence could have been as little as one year. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-45(a) (West 2012). ¶ 31 We feel conf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Assault and Battery Laws: Charges and Penalties (2026), Illinois Felony Classes and Misdemeanor Penalties (2026), Illinois Reckless Driving Laws: Penalties, Points and Speed (2026)
§ 5-5-3.2Factors in aggravation and extended-term sentencingIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The following factors shall be accorded weight in favor of imposing a term of imprisonment or may be considered by the court as reasons to impose a more severe sentence under Section 5-8-1 or Article 4.5 of Chapter V: (1) the defendant's conduct caused or threatened serious harm; (2) the defendant received compensation for committing the offense; (3) the defendant has a history of prior delinquency or criminal activity; (4) the defendant, by the duties of his office or by his position, was obliged to prevent the particular offense committed or to bring the offenders committing it to justice; (5) the defendant held public office at the time of the offense, and the offense related to the conduct of that office; (6) the defendant utilized his professional reputation or position in the community to commit the offense, or to afford him an easier means of committing it; (7) the sentence is necessary to deter others from committing the same crime; (8) the defendant committed the offense against a person 60 years of age or older or such person's property; (9) the defendant committed the offense against a person who has a physical disability or such person's property; (10) by reason of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 580 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Jackson (Illinois Supreme Court 2002, 199 Ill. 2d 286)“…en of proof was merely a preponderance of the evidence. See 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b)(2), 5-8-2(a) (West 1996). She furthe…”
- People v. Heider (Illinois Supreme Court 2008, 231 Ill. 2d 1)“…sons to impose a more severe sentence under Section 5-8-1." 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(a) (West 2002). Mental retardation is n…”
- People v. Ford (Illinois Supreme Court 2001, 198 Ill. 2d 68)“…utal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty." See 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b)(2), 5-8-2(a)(1) (West 1998). Defen…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Is a Life Sentence in Illinois? (2026 Guide)
Sources and References
- Illinois Eavesdropping Act(ilga.gov).gov
- Illinois Eavesdropping Penalties(ilga.gov).gov
- Exceptions to the Eavesdropping Act(ilga.gov).gov
- Unauthorized Video Recording and Live Video Transmission(ilga.gov).gov
- Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act(ilga.gov).gov
- BIPA Requirements for Private Entities (740 ILCS 14/15)(ilga.gov).gov
- Protecting Household Privacy Act(ilga.gov).gov
- Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act(ilga.gov).gov
- Illinois Disorderly Conduct Statute(ilga.gov).gov
- Illinois Workplace Surveillance Bill SB0173(ilga.gov).gov
- BIPA 2024 Amendment Analysis(dwt.com)
- Protecting Household Privacy Act Analysis(epic.org)
- Illinois Eavesdropping Act (720 ILCS 5/14-2)(ilga.gov)
- Eavesdropping Article Definitions (720 ILCS 5/14-1)(ilga.gov)
- Exceptions to the Eavesdropping Act (720 ILCS 5/14-3)(ilga.gov)
- Unauthorized Video Recording and Live Video Transmission (720 ILCS 5/26-4)(ilga.gov)
- Illinois Disorderly Conduct Statute (720 ILCS 5/26-1)(ilga.gov)
- Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act Definitions (740 ILCS 14/10)(ilga.gov)
- Protecting Household Privacy Act, Prohibited Use of Household Electronic Data (5 ILCS 855/10)(ilga.gov)
- Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act, Exceptions (725 ILCS 167/15)(ilga.gov)
- Class 4 Felonies; Sentence (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-45)(ilga.gov)
- Class A Misdemeanors; Sentence (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55)(ilga.gov)