EnglishEspañol
Recording LawsIllinois Laws flagIllinois Laws
Illinois flag

Illinois

Illinois Video Recording Laws: Consent, BIPA, and Surveillance Rules (2026)

Independently fact-checkedEditor-reviewedLaw current as of November 1, 2026By Recording Law Editorial TeamReviewed November 2, 202610 min read

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Illinois Video Recording Laws: Consent, BIPA, and Surveillance Rules (2026)

In Illinois, silent video recording in public spaces is broadly legal, but adding audio to any video of a private conversation requires all-party consent under 720 ILCS 5/14-2. Unauthorized video recording in bathrooms or changing rooms is a Class 4 felony under 720 ILCS 5/26-4.

Illinois video recording laws operate at the intersection of multiple statutes, creating a layered legal framework that depends on what the camera captures, where it is placed, and how the footage is used. The state's eavesdropping law under 720 ILCS 5/14-2 governs any video recording that includes audio of private conversations. The Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14) adds a separate compliance layer when video systems capture facial geometry or other biometric identifiers. And the video voyeurism statute under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 prohibits video recording people without consent in listed private places and recording a person's intimate parts without consent.

This combination makes Illinois one of the most regulated states for video recording in the country.

Video Recording and the Illinois Eavesdropping Statute

The Audio-Video Distinction

The Illinois eavesdropping statute under Article 14 of the Criminal Code focuses primarily on audio capture. This creates an important legal distinction:

Silent video in public is generally legal in Illinois, but filming someone without consent in a restroom or their home is a felony and secret audio of a private conversation needs everyone's consent.
Video alone in public is usually fine; private places and audio of private conversations are where Illinois law bites.
  • Silent video (video without audio) in public spaces is generally legal and does not trigger the eavesdropping statute
  • Video with audio of a private conversation requires all-party consent under 720 ILCS 5/14-2

This means a security camera that records video-only footage in a store does not implicate the eavesdropping law. But the same camera with audio recording capability that captures private conversations between employees or customers triggers the all-party consent requirement. The eavesdropping law applies only to surreptitious recording, meaning recording done by stealth, deception, secrecy, or concealment.

You must obtain consent from all parties before making a video recording when:

  • The recording captures audio of a private conversation
  • The parties to the conversation have a reasonable expectation of privacy
  • The recording takes place in a location where privacy expectations exist (private offices, homes, hotel rooms)

After People v. Clark (2014) and the subsequent statutory reform, the eavesdropping law only protects conversations where parties have a reasonable expectation of privacy. A video recording of a public interaction at normal volume on a sidewalk does not require consent, even if it captures audio, because no privacy expectation exists.

Penalties for Video Recording With Unauthorized Audio

Recording video that captures audio of a private conversation without consent carries the same penalties as any eavesdropping offense under 720 ILCS 5/14-4:

OffenseClassificationPrison SentenceMaximum Fine
Basic eavesdropping offense (first offense)Class 4 Felony1 to 3 years$25,000
Basic eavesdropping offense (subsequent offense)Class 3 Felony2 to 5 years$25,000
Eavesdropping on law enforcement (first offense)Class 3 Felony2 to 5 years$25,000

BIPA and Video Recording in Illinois

Illinois hand placing a smartphone face-down on a restaurant table beside a coffee cup

What Is BIPA?

The Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14), enacted in 2008, is one of the most powerful biometric privacy laws in the United States. BIPA regulates the collection, use, storage, and disclosure of biometric identifiers, which include:

  • Retina or iris scans
  • Fingerprints
  • Voiceprints
  • Scans of hand or face geometry

Video recording systems that capture facial geometry trigger BIPA compliance obligations. This includes security cameras with facial recognition capabilities, smart camera systems that identify individuals, and any video technology that processes biometric data from recorded footage.

BIPA Requirements for Video Systems

Any private entity (not a government agency) that collects biometric identifiers through video recording must:

  1. Inform the subject in writing that biometric data is being collected or stored
  2. Inform the subject in writing of the specific purpose and length of term for the collection
  3. Obtain a written release from the subject before collecting their biometric data
  4. Develop a publicly available written policy establishing a retention schedule and guidelines for permanent destruction of biometric data

BIPA Damages

BIPA provides a private right of action in which a court may award significant liquidated damages (the Illinois Supreme Court has said they are discretionary, not mandatory):

  • $1,000 per violation for negligent violations
  • $5,000 per violation for intentional or reckless violations
  • Reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs

The scale of potential BIPA liability is substantial. In 2025 a federal judge approved a Clearview AI BIPA settlement that would have given the class a 23% equity stake, estimated at about $51.75 million, but in July 2026 the Seventh Circuit vacated that approval and sent the case back, so the settlement is not final. Facebook settled a BIPA class action for $650 million in 2021 over its facial recognition tag suggestion feature.

Video Surveillance Systems and BIPA

Businesses and property owners who install video surveillance systems with facial recognition or biometric processing capabilities face BIPA obligations for every individual whose facial geometry the system captures. This applies to:

  • Retail stores using facial recognition to identify shoplifters
  • Office buildings using biometric access control cameras
  • Residential complexes using smart camera doorbells with facial identification
  • Any camera system that processes facial geometry, even if the primary purpose is general security

The key question is whether the video system merely records visual images or actively processes biometric identifiers. A standard security camera that records footage without biometric analysis does not trigger BIPA. A camera system that scans and matches facial geometry does.

Video Voyeurism Laws in Illinois

Illinois hands typing on a mechanical keyboard from above

Illinois law separately prohibits video recording in contexts that violate personal bodily privacy. Under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 ("Unauthorized video recording and live video transmission"), it is illegal to:

  • Record in listed private places: Knowingly video recording or live-streaming another person without consent in a restroom, tanning bed, tanning salon, locker room, changing room, or hotel bedroom (26-4(a)), or in that person's own residence (26-4(a-5) and (a-6)). No sexual motive is required
  • Record intimate parts: Knowingly video recording another person's intimate parts (unclothed, partially unclothed, or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, anus, or female nipple) without consent, for the purpose of viewing the person's body or undergarments, wherever it happens (26-4(a-10))
  • Disseminate an unlawfully made video: Knowingly sharing a video or live transmission that was itself made in violation of this same section

Illinois's broader "revenge porn" law is a separate statute: 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 makes it a Class 4 felony to intentionally share an intimate image of an identifiable person without consent when the image was obtained under circumstances in which a reasonable person would know it was to remain private. Unlike 26-4(a-25), it does not require that the image itself was unlawfully made.

Penalties for Video Voyeurism

OffenseClassificationPenalty
Placing a recording device with intent, before any recording occursClass A MisdemeanorUp to 1 year in jail
Non-consensual recording in a listed place or residence, or of intimate partsClass 4 Felony1 to 3 years prison
Same, if the victim is under 18 or the offender is a registered sex offenderClass 3 Felony2 to 5 years prison
Disseminating a video unlawfully made under this sectionClass 3 Felony2 to 5 years prison
Same dissemination, if the victim is under 18 or the offender is a registered sex offenderClass 2 Felony3 to 7 years prison

Unauthorized video recording under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 is not itself listed as a registrable sex offense in the Sex Offender Registration Act (730 ILCS 150/2), although conduct involving a minor can also be charged under other statutes that do require registration.

Hidden Cameras in Private Spaces

Placing a hidden camera with intent to record someone without consent is a crime in the places 720 ILCS 5/26-4 lists, and recording someone there is a felony. These are:

  • Restrooms (public and private)
  • Locker rooms and changing rooms, including retail dressing rooms
  • Tanning beds and tanning salons
  • Hotel bedrooms
  • The person's own residence

A room that is not on this list, such as a guest bedroom used by an occasional visitor, is not covered by the place-based prongs. A room you rent out is different: under 26-4(e), a residence includes a rental dwelling, so the room can be the occupant's residence under 26-4(a-5). Recording a person's intimate parts without consent, for the purpose of viewing their body or undergarments, is a felony anywhere under 26-4(a-10).

The prohibition applies regardless of whether the camera records audio. Silent hidden cameras in these locations violate the voyeurism statute independently of the eavesdropping law.

Video Recording in Public Spaces

Illinois hand reaching toward a wall-mounted intercom speaker panel

General Rules for Public Recording

Video recording in public spaces where no expectation of privacy exists is generally permitted under Illinois law. After the 2014 reform, the eavesdropping statute only protects private conversations, so capturing video (even with audio) of public activity does not violate the statute.

Legal public video recording includes:

  • Recording in parks, sidewalks, and public streets
  • Filming public events, protests, and demonstrations
  • Recording at government buildings that are open to the public
  • Capturing video of police officers performing their public duties

Recording Police Officers

Since January 1, 2016, 720 ILCS 5/14-2(e) has provided that the eavesdropping law does not prohibit a civilian from recording a law enforcement officer performing duties in a public place or where the officer has no reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a traffic stop. Recording other officials is lawful when their conversation is not private. You may video record officers when:

  • The officer is performing public duties
  • You are in a place where you have a right to be
  • You do not physically interfere with the officer's duties
  • You are not trespassing on private property

This right covers both audio and video recording of police activity in public settings.

Commercial Video Recording

Retail and Business Surveillance

Illinois businesses may install video surveillance cameras in public areas of their premises, such as sales floors, lobbies, and parking lots. Standard video surveillance that does not capture audio of private conversations and does not process biometric data is generally lawful.

However, businesses must ensure:

  • Cameras are not placed in restrooms, changing rooms, or other areas where bodily privacy is expected
  • If cameras capture audio, the eavesdropping law requirements are met
  • If cameras use facial recognition or biometric processing, BIPA requirements are satisfied
  • Employees receive notice of video monitoring in the workplace

Video Doorbells and Smart Cameras

Residential video doorbell cameras (Ring, Nest, and similar products) raise several legal considerations in Illinois:

  • Recording video of a public-facing front porch or driveway is generally legal
  • If the camera captures audio of private conversations, the eavesdropping law may apply
  • If the camera uses facial recognition features, BIPA compliance is required
  • Cameras should not be pointed at areas where neighbors have a reasonable expectation of privacy

Drones and Aerial Video Recording

Illinois regulates drone-based video recording through the Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act (725 ILCS 167). This law restricts law enforcement drone use without a warrant, with exceptions for emergencies, terrorist threats, crime scene documentation, and search and rescue operations.

For civilian drone operators, standard video recording rules apply:

  • Recording public spaces from the air is generally permitted
  • Recording in locations where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy may violate state law
  • Audio capture from drones triggers the eavesdropping statute for private conversations
  • FAA regulations regarding drone operation must also be followed

Video Evidence in Illinois Courts

Admissibility Standards

Video recordings are admissible as evidence in Illinois courts when they are:

  • Obtained lawfully (no eavesdropping or voyeurism violations)
  • Authentic and unaltered
  • Relevant to the case
  • Properly preserved with a documented chain of custody

Under 720 ILCS 5/14-5, evidence obtained in violation of the eavesdropping law is generally inadmissible in civil and criminal proceedings, except in a prosecution for eavesdropping itself or when all parties consent to its admission. Neither the video recording statute (720 ILCS 5/26-4) nor BIPA has a comparable exclusion rule, and BIPA expressly says it does not affect the admission or discovery of biometric evidence (740 ILCS 14/25(a)).

Authentication Requirements

Illinois courts require authentication of video evidence, which typically involves testimony from the person who operated the recording device or a witness who can verify that the video accurately represents the events it depicts. For automated surveillance footage, testimony from the system's operator regarding the camera's installation, maintenance, and recording process can satisfy authentication requirements.

More Illinois Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to Illinois Recording Laws

More Illinois Recording Topics

More Illinois Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it legal to video record someone in Illinois without their knowledge?

It depends on the context. Silent video recording in public spaces is generally legal. Video recording that captures audio of a private conversation requires consent from all parties under 720 ILCS 5/14-2. Recording in areas where someone has bodily privacy (bathrooms, changing rooms) is a Class 4 felony under the voyeurism statute regardless of audio capture.

Does BIPA apply to video surveillance cameras?

BIPA applies to video cameras that capture biometric identifiers such as facial geometry. A standard security camera that simply records footage does not trigger BIPA. A camera system with facial recognition or biometric processing capabilities does. BIPA requires informed written consent before collecting biometric data, and a court may award $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per intentional or reckless violation.

Can I install a hidden camera in my home in Illinois?

You may generally install cameras in common areas of your own home, such as living rooms and entryways, for security purposes. Recording video of another adult inside their own residence without consent is a Class 4 felony under 720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-5), with no exception for the homeowner, so get consent from a spouse, roommate, or live-in caregiver before recording them. Do not record in bathrooms or where anyone undresses. If cameras capture audio, the eavesdropping statute requires consent from all parties to any private conversation recorded.

What are the penalties for video voyeurism in Illinois?

Video voyeurism (recording someone without consent in a listed private place or their own home, or recording their intimate parts to view their body or undergarments) is a Class 4 felony carrying 1 to 3 years in prison, escalating to a Class 3 felony (2 to 5 years) if the victim is under 18 or the offender is a registered sex offender. Disseminating a video that was itself unlawfully made under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 is a Class 3 felony, escalating to a Class 2 felony (3 to 7 years) under the same triggers. Illinois's broader revenge-porn law, 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, separately makes the non-consensual sharing of intimate images a Class 4 felony if the sharer obtained the image under circumstances in which a reasonable person would know it was to remain private. Section 26-4 is not itself a registrable offense under the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Can I use a dashcam with audio in Illinois?

A dashcam that records video only is generally legal on public roads. If the dashcam captures audio of conversations inside the vehicle, the eavesdropping law applies. You need consent from all passengers before recording their private conversations. Recording police during a traffic stop is expressly allowed under 720 ILCS 5/14-2(e), added in 2016.

Updates

Clarified in an FAQ answer that BIPA damages are awarded at a court's discretion and include reckless violations, and fixed broken links to the Illinois eavesdropping statute.

Clarified that BIPA damages are awarded at a court's discretion rather than automatically.

Corrected the description of the Illinois revenge-porn law to include its requirement that the image was obtained in circumstances where it was meant to stay private, noted that a rented room can be the occupant's residence under the video-recording law, stated the purpose element of the intimate-parts offense, and fixed a broken statute link.

Corrected the description of Illinois's video recording law (no sexual-motive element; the current intimate-parts prong replaced the old under-clothing language in 2022; recording another adult in their own home without consent is a felony), removed an incorrect sex offender registration claim, credited the police-recording provision to its 2016 law, corrected the evidence-exclusion rules, and updated the vacated Clearview AI settlement.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the penalty for unauthorized audio recording captured on video, which the page stated as a flat Class 2 felony: it is actually a Class 4 felony for a first offense and Class 3 felony for a subsequent offense. Also rebuilt the video-voyeurism penalty table, which invented a first-offense/subsequent-offense structure for disseminating an unlawfully recorded video: the real law sets a Class 3 felony baseline escalating to Class 2 when the victim is under 18 or the offender is a registered sex offender, and separately carries a Class A misdemeanor for placing a recording device with intent before any recording occurs. Retitled a mislabeled citation and added Illinois's actual revenge-porn statute, 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, which the page had conflated with the narrower unauthorized-video-recording law.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the penalty for eavesdropping on a law enforcement officer or official: it is a Class 3 felony (2 to 5 years) for a first offense, not a Class 1 felony (4 to 15 years) as previously stated.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Spoke propagation refresh. Corrected eavesdropping penalty from Class 4 to Class 2 felony (up to 5 years) per 720 ILCS 5/14-4 and parent hub audit. Corrected law enforcement eavesdropping penalty from Class 3 to Class 1 felony (4 to 15 years). Corrected fear-of-crime exception from 14-3(i) to 14-3(h) where misattributed. Fixed SourcesList prop (sources to citations). Updated More Illinois Laws anchor text. Added People v. Clark and ACLU v. Alvarez citations where missing.

Spoke propagation refresh (2026-05-15) introduced errors this pass corrects: basic eavesdropping (audio captured on video) is a Class 4 felony (1 to 3 years) for a first offense and Class 3 felony (2 to 5 years) for a subsequent offense per 720 ILCS 5/14-4, not a flat Class 2; the 26-4(a-25) dissemination penalty is a Class 3 felony baseline escalating to Class 2 for a victim under 18 or a registered-sex-offender offender, not a fabricated first/subsequent-offense Class 4/Class 3 ladder; and 26-4 was retitled to its actual heading, with Illinois's real revenge-porn statute (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5) added.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. 720 ILCS 5/14-2 - Elements of Eavesdropping Offense(ilga.gov).gov
  2. 720 ILCS 5/14-1 - Definitions(ilga.gov).gov
  3. 720 ILCS 5/14-4 - Penalties(ilga.gov).gov
  4. 740 ILCS 14 - Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)(ilga.gov).gov
  5. 720 ILCS 5/26-4 - Unauthorized video recording and live video transmission(ilga.gov).gov
  6. 725 ILCS 167 - Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act(ilga.gov).gov
  7. 18 U.S.C. Section 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
  8. 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 - Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images(ilga.gov).gov
Share: