Illinois
Illinois Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and BIPA Rules (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Illinois criminalizes unauthorized video recording in restrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, tanning beds and salons, hotel bedrooms, and a person's own home under 720 ILCS 5/26-4. A first offense is a Class 4 felony carrying one to three years in prison. The statute also makes it a felony to record a person's intimate parts without consent, to view their body or undergarments, wherever it happens, and to share a video made in violation of the section. Sharing intimate images in general is a separate crime under 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5.
Illinois treats voyeurism and unauthorized hidden camera surveillance as serious criminal offenses. The state's primary voyeurism statute, 720 ILCS 5/26-4, criminalizes video recording people without consent in listed private places and sharing videos made that way. When hidden cameras capture biometric identifiers like facial geometry, the Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14) creates additional civil liability. Together, these statutes give Illinois some of the strongest protections against invasive recording in the country.
Understanding 720 ILCS 5/26-4
The Core Prohibition
The Illinois unauthorized video recording statute under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 addresses several distinct types of prohibited recording and image sharing. The statute has been expanded over the years to address evolving technology and new forms of privacy invasion.
Video Voyeurism (Recording in Private Areas)
Illinois law makes it a criminal offense to knowingly make a video record of, or transmit live video of, another person without that person's consent in any of the places the statute lists. Section 26-4(a) names these locations:
- Restrooms
- Locker rooms
- Changing rooms
- Tanning beds and tanning salons
- Hotel bedrooms
Two further subsections, (a-5) and (a-6), make it a crime to record or transmit video of a person in that person's own residence without consent, including by a device operated from outside the residence. "Residence" includes a rental dwelling but not stairwells, corridors, laundry facilities, or other areas open to the public. Recording in one of these places is a Class 4 felony. Placing or causing a device to be placed in one of these places with the intent to record someone without consent is a separate, lesser offense under subsections (a-15) and (a-20): a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by less than one year in jail under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55.
The offense requires that the recording be made without the consent of the person recorded; a person who knows about a camera but did not agree to it is still protected. No subsection of 26-4 requires proof of sexual motive.
Upskirting and Under-Clothing Recording
Section 26-4(a-10) makes it a Class 4 felony to knowingly video record another person's intimate parts without consent for the purpose of viewing the person's body or undergarments. "Intimate parts" means the fully unclothed, partially unclothed, or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, anus, or a female's partially or fully exposed nipple. This covers "upskirting" and similar invasive recording techniques. The prohibition applies regardless of the location where the recording occurs, so it reaches a fully public setting. (Before January 1, 2022, this subsection was worded in terms of recording "under or through the clothing.")
Illinois's Revenge Porn Statute: 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5
Illinois's dedicated "revenge porn" law is a separate statute from the voyeurism section above: 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, "Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images," a Class 4 felony. It is illegal to intentionally disseminate an image of another person who is engaged in a sexual act or whose intimate parts are exposed, in whole or in part, when:
- The person in the image is identifiable from the image itself or from information displayed with it, or is known to the person who disseminates it
- The person who disseminates the image obtained it under circumstances in which a reasonable person would know or understand that the image was to remain private
- The person who disseminates the image knows or should have known that the person in the image did not consent to the dissemination
The statute no longer limits the offense to images of adults.
This prohibition covers digital distribution through social media, messaging apps, email, websites, and any other electronic means. It applies whether the original image was taken with consent (such as a photo shared within a relationship) or without consent.
Section 26-4 (the voyeurism statute discussed above) has its own, narrower dissemination clause at (a-25): it only reaches dissemination of a video that was itself unlawfully RECORDED under 26-4's other subsections, not images that were originally captured with consent.
Criminal Penalties

Voyeurism Penalties
| Offense | Classification | Prison Sentence | Additional Consequences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video voyeurism (listed place or residence) | Class 4 Felony | 1 to 3 years | Not itself a registrable offense |
| Video voyeurism (victim under 18, or offender required to register) | Class 3 Felony | 2 to 5 years | Not itself a registrable offense |
| Recording intimate parts (26-4(a-10)) | Class 4 Felony | 1 to 3 years | Not itself a registrable offense |
| Placing a device with intent to record (subsections (a-15), (a-20)) | Class A Misdemeanor (Class 3 Felony if victim under 18 or offender is a registered sex offender) | Less than 1 year |
Penalties for Sharing an Unlawfully Made Video (26-4(a-25))
| Offense | Classification | Prison Sentence |
|---|---|---|
| Base offense | Class 3 Felony | 2 to 5 years |
| Victim under 18, or offender is a registered sex offender | Class 2 Felony | 3 to 7 years |
| Dissemination of images of a minor | Enhanced penalties | Separate child exploitation charges apply |
Fines and Restitution
All felony convictions carry potential fines of up to $25,000. Courts may also order restitution to the victim for counseling costs, lost wages, and other expenses resulting from the offense. In non-consensual dissemination cases, a victim can also seek a civil court order requiring the images to be taken down.

Sex Offender Registration

Unauthorized video recording under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 is not itself listed as a registrable sex offense in the Sex Offender Registration Act (730 ILCS 150), whose definition of "sex offense" in Section 2 does not include Section 26-4. Conduct involving a minor can, however, be charged under other statutes that do require registration, such as child sexual abuse material laws. A person who is already required to register faces the higher Class 3 or Class 2 felony tiers under 26-4.
Sex offender registration in Illinois carries significant collateral consequences, including residency restrictions, employment limitations, and ongoing reporting requirements. The registration period depends on the classification of the offense and can last 10 years to life.
BIPA and Hidden Camera Surveillance

When BIPA Applies to Hidden Cameras
The Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14) adds a separate layer of civil liability when hidden cameras capture biometric identifiers. BIPA applies when a camera system:
- Uses facial recognition technology to identify individuals
- Captures and processes facial geometry
- Creates biometric templates from recorded images or video
- Stores or transmits biometric data to third parties
A standard hidden camera that simply records visual images without biometric processing does not trigger BIPA. The critical distinction is whether the recording system processes biometric identifiers as defined under BIPA Section 10.
BIPA Damages for Covert Biometric Collection
BIPA provides a private right of action that allows any aggrieved person to sue for the following (the Illinois Supreme Court has said the liquidated damages are discretionary, not mandatory):
- $1,000 per violation for negligent BIPA violations
- $5,000 per violation for intentional or reckless BIPA violations
- Reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, and litigation costs
- Injunctive relief and other remedies the court determines appropriate
The per-violation damage structure can lead to massive aggregate liability. The $650 million Facebook cash settlement in 2021 illustrates the financial scale of BIPA enforcement. In 2025 a federal judge approved a Clearview AI BIPA settlement that would have given the class a 23% equity stake, estimated at about $51.75 million, but in July 2026 the Seventh Circuit vacated that approval and sent the case back, so the settlement is not final. For hidden camera surveillance that captures biometric identifiers without consent, each individual whose biometrics are collected represents a separate violation.
Employer Hidden Camera Liability Under BIPA
Employers who install hidden cameras with biometric capabilities in the workplace face particular BIPA exposure. Monitoring systems that use facial recognition to track employee attendance, identify individuals in restricted areas, or analyze workplace behavior must comply with BIPA's consent requirements. This means:
- Providing written notice that biometric data is being collected
- Disclosing the purpose and duration of collection
- Obtaining a written release from each employee
- Maintaining a publicly available data retention and destruction policy
Failure to satisfy these requirements exposes the employer to BIPA litigation from every employee whose biometrics were captured.
Hidden Cameras in Specific Contexts
Nanny Cameras and Home Surveillance
Illinois homeowners may install surveillance cameras in common areas of their homes, such as living rooms, kitchens, and entryways. These cameras are generally legal when used for security purposes. However, several restrictions apply:
- Recording video of someone inside their own residence without their consent is a Class 4 felony under 720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-5), and the law has no exception for the owner of the home. If another adult lives there, such as a spouse, roommate, or live-in nanny or caregiver, get that person's consent before recording video of them, even in shared areas
- Cameras must not be placed in bathrooms, guest bedrooms where visitors expect privacy, or areas where caregivers change clothes
- If cameras capture audio of private conversations, the all-party consent eavesdropping law under 720 ILCS 5/14-2 requires consent from all parties
- Homeowners should notify nannies, caregivers, and domestic workers about the presence of cameras
- If cameras use facial recognition, BIPA consent requirements apply
Retail Fitting Room Surveillance
Illinois retail stores are prohibited from placing cameras in fitting rooms and changing areas. This prohibition is absolute and applies to all recording devices, whether visible or hidden. Retailers who violate this rule face criminal prosecution under the voyeurism statute and potential civil liability from affected customers.
Hotel and Airbnb Hidden Cameras
Guests in Illinois hotels, motels, vacation rentals, and Airbnb properties have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their rooms. Recording a guest without consent in a hotel bedroom or restroom, or in a rental dwelling the guest is occupying as a residence, is a Class 4 felony under 720 ILCS 5/26-4. Placing a hidden camera there with the intent to record a guest is itself a crime, a Class A misdemeanor under subsections (a-15) and (a-20), even if no recording is made. Property owners who install hidden cameras also face civil lawsuits.
The felony offense turns on knowingly making a video record or transmitting live video without consent, regardless of whether the owner later viewed the footage. Installing the device with the intent to record, without more, is the separate misdemeanor.
Relationship to the Eavesdropping Statute
Voyeurism and eavesdropping are separate offenses in Illinois, but they can overlap when hidden cameras capture both video and audio. A hidden camera in a bathroom that records audio of private conversations violates both the voyeurism statute under 720 ILCS 5/26-4 and the eavesdropping statute under 720 ILCS 5/14-2. In such cases, the perpetrator can face charges under both statutes, and a court may impose a sentence for each.
The eavesdropping statute requires that the recorded conversation be "private" as defined by the statute. The voyeurism statute has no such requirement for audio. Instead, it focuses on whether video was recorded or transmitted without consent in one of the listed places (a restroom, locker room, changing room, tanning bed or salon, hotel bedroom, or the victim's residence) or of a person's intimate parts. Section 26-4(c) states that it does not apply to sound recordings of oral conversations covered by the eavesdropping article.
Civil Remedies for Voyeurism Victims
Tort Claims
Victims of voyeurism in Illinois can pursue civil lawsuits for:
- Invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion): Intentional intrusion into a person's private affairs that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress: Extreme and outrageous conduct causing severe emotional distress
- Negligent infliction of emotional distress: When property owners negligently allow hidden cameras on their premises
BIPA Claims
When hidden cameras collect biometric identifiers, victims may also bring BIPA claims with the statutory damages described above.
Eavesdropping Civil Remedies
Under 720 ILCS 5/14-6, victims of illegal audio recording may sue for injunctive relief, actual damages, and punitive damages. This remedy applies when a hidden camera captures audio of private conversations.
Digital Distribution and Online Platforms
Illinois Law on Image Removal
Illinois non-consensual dissemination laws apply to distribution through any platform, including social media, messaging apps, websites, and file-sharing services. Victims can seek court orders requiring the removal of non-consensually shared images.
Federal Communications Decency Act (Section 230)
While Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. 230) provides some immunity to online platforms for user-posted content, this immunity does not protect the person who originally posted the non-consensual images. The platform may be difficult to hold liable, but the person who disseminated the images faces full criminal and civil liability under Illinois law.
Deepfakes and AI-Generated Images
Illinois law is evolving to address AI-generated intimate images (deepfakes). Illinois's civil remedies law, 740 ILCS 190, expressly lets a person sue over the dissemination of an intentionally digitally altered sexual image, such as a deepfake, and labeling the image as altered is not a defense. Whether the criminal statute, 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, reaches deepfakes is less clear, because its text does not expressly mention digitally altered images. At the federal level, the TAKE IT DOWN Act (signed May 19, 2025) criminalizes non-consensual publication of intimate visual depictions including AI-generated images, and requires online platforms to remove such content within 48 hours of a victim request. Illinois-based victims now have both state-law civil remedies and federal criminal recourse for AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery.
Reporting Voyeurism in Illinois
Victims of voyeurism or hidden camera surveillance in Illinois can report the offense to:
- Local law enforcement (police or sheriff's department)
- The Illinois Attorney General's office for cases involving online distribution
- The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) for cases involving interstate distribution or federal crimes
Felony charges in Illinois generally must be brought within 3 years of the offense (720 ILCS 5/3-5(b)). For unauthorized video recording under 720 ILCS 5/26-4, prosecution may also be started within one year after the victim discovers the offense (720 ILCS 5/3-6(l)), which matters when a hidden camera is found long after it was installed. Report as soon as you find a hidden camera or recording, to preserve evidence.
More Illinois Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Illinois Recording Laws
More Illinois Recording Topics
More Illinois Laws
- Illinois AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Illinois Dashcam Laws
- Illinois Data Privacy Laws
- Illinois Deepfake Laws
- Illinois Employee Monitoring Laws
- Illinois GPS Tracking Laws
- Illinois Police Bodycam Laws
- Illinois Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to place a hidden camera in a bathroom in Illinois?
Yes. Placing a hidden camera in a restroom, changing room, locker room, tanning bed or salon, hotel bedroom, or another person's residence with the intent to record someone without consent is a Class A misdemeanor under 720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-15) and (a-20). Actually recording or transmitting video of a person without consent in one of those places is a Class 4 felony, carrying 1 to 3 years in prison and up to $25,000 in fines. If the victim is under 18, the recording offense escalates to a Class 3 felony, and the placement offense also becomes a Class 3 felony.
What is the penalty for revenge porn in Illinois?
Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images under 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 is a Class 4 felony. Illinois's voyeurism statute, 720 ILCS 5/26-4, separately makes it a Class 3 felony (2 to 5 years) to disseminate a video that was itself unlawfully recorded under that section, escalating to a Class 2 felony (3 to 7 years) if the victim is under 18 or the offender is a registered sex offender. Courts may also order restitution to the victim, and a victim can seek a civil court order requiring the images to be taken down.
Can I sue someone for placing a hidden camera in my Airbnb in Illinois?
Yes. You can pursue criminal charges under the voyeurism statute (720 ILCS 5/26-4) and civil claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. If the camera used facial recognition, you may also have a BIPA claim, under which a court may award $1,000 to $5,000 per violation. If the camera captured audio of private conversations, the eavesdropping statute provides additional civil remedies.
Does BIPA apply to hidden cameras?
BIPA applies when hidden cameras capture biometric identifiers such as facial geometry through facial recognition technology. A standard hidden camera that records visual images without biometric processing does not trigger BIPA. However, a camera with facial recognition capabilities that scans and matches facial geometry does trigger BIPA, requiring informed written consent before collection.
Can my employer put hidden cameras in the workplace in Illinois?
Employers cannot place cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, changing areas, or other spaces where employees have bodily privacy expectations. Cameras in common work areas are generally permitted if employees receive notice. If workplace cameras use facial recognition, BIPA requires informed written consent from each employee. Hidden cameras that capture audio of private conversations violate the eavesdropping statute.
Updates
Fixed broken links to the Illinois eavesdropping statute and its civil-remedies section.
Clarified that BIPA damages are awarded at a court's discretion rather than automatically, and fixed a broken link to the eavesdropping civil-remedies statute.
Listed the places the Illinois video-recording law actually covers, stated the purpose element of the intimate-parts offense, added that Illinois civil law (740 ILCS 190) expressly allows suits over digitally altered sexual images, and fixed a broken statute link.
Removed incorrect claims that video voyeurism carries mandatory or discretionary sex offender registration, added the rule that a 26-4 prosecution may begin within one year after the victim discovers the offense, updated the intimate-parts recording offense to its post-2022 wording, corrected the elements of the revenge-porn statute and the voyeurism statute, added that filming another adult in their own home without consent is a felony even for the homeowner, and updated the vacated Clearview AI settlement.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the list of places covered by 720 ILCS 5/26-4 to the locations the statute names (plus a person's own residence) and clarified that placing a hidden camera with intent to record is a separate Class A misdemeanor, while the recording itself is the Class 4 felony.
Corrected the penalty for disseminating an unlawfully recorded video, which the page described as a fabricated first-offense/second-offense ladder: the real trigger for the higher penalty is the victim being under 18 or the offender being a registered sex offender, not repeat offenses. Also identified that Illinois's actual revenge-porn statute is a separate law, 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, which this page had conflated with the narrower voyeurism dissemination clause; fixed the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date from 2026 to 2025; clarified the Clearview AI settlement as an equity-stake valuation rather than a cash payout; and replaced two dead citation links.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Spoke propagation refresh. Corrected eavesdropping penalty from Class 4 to Class 2 felony (up to 5 years) per 720 ILCS 5/14-4 and parent hub audit. Corrected law enforcement eavesdropping penalty from Class 3 to Class 1 felony (4 to 15 years). Corrected fear-of-crime exception from 14-3(i) to 14-3(h) where misattributed. Fixed SourcesList prop (sources to citations). Updated More Illinois Laws anchor text. Added People v. Clark and ACLU v. Alvarez citations where missing.
Spoke propagation refresh (2026-05-15) left several errors this pass corrects: the 26-4(a-25) dissemination penalty is a Class 3 felony baseline escalating to Class 2 for a victim under 18 or a registered-sex-offender offender, not a fabricated first/subsequent-offense Class 4/Class 3 ladder; Illinois's actual revenge-porn statute is 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, not 26-4, which this page had conflated; the TAKE IT DOWN Act was misdated 2026 instead of 2025; and the Clearview AI settlement was clarified as an equity-stake valuation, not a cash payout.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 720, Act 5 (Criminal Code of 2012)
§ 26-4Unauthorized video recording and live video transmissionIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person without that person's consent in a restroom, tanning bed, tanning salon, locker room, changing room, or hotel bedroom. (a-5) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person in that other person's residence without that person's consent. (a-6) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person in that other person's residence without that person's consent when the recording or transmission is made outside that person's residence by use of an audio or video device that records or transmits from a remote location. (a-10) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a video record or transmit live video of another person's intimate parts for the purpose of viewing the body of or the undergarments worn by that other person without that person's consent.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. McCavitt (Illinois Supreme Court 2021, 452 Ill. Dec. 456)“…o Recording/Live Video Transmission in violation of 720 ILCS 5/26-4,” and the warrant authorized th…”
- People v. Van Syckle (Appellate Court of Illinois 2020, 2019 IL App (1st) 181410)“…in violation of section 26-4(a) of the Criminal Code (720 ILCS 5/26-4(a) (West 2014)). Defendant filed a…”
- People v. Maillet (Appellate Court of Illinois 2019, 2019 IL App (2d) 161114)“…of section 26-4(a-5) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/26-4(a-5) (West 2012)). Count II alleged tha…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent Rules, Illinois Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Camera Rules and Privacy Rights (2026), Illinois Video Recording Laws: Consent, BIPA, and Surveillance Rules (2026)
§ 11-23.5Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual imagesIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this Section: "Computer", "computer program", and "data" have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 17-0.5 of this Code. "Image" includes a photograph, film, videotape, digital recording, or other depiction or portrayal of an object, including a human body. "Intimate parts" means the fully unclothed, partially unclothed or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, anus, or if the person is female, a partially or fully exposed nipple, including exposure through transparent clothing. "Personal identifying information" has the meaning ascribed to the term in Section 16-0.1. "Sexual act" means sexual penetration, masturbation, or sexual activity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Austin (Illinois Supreme Court 2019, 2019 IL 123910)“…ating section 11-23.5(b) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b) (West 2016)), which criminalizes…”
- People v. Moeller (Appellate Court of Illinois 2024, 2024 IL App (2d) 230043)“…on of section 11-23.5 of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 (West 2016)). The court specifically fo…”
- People v. Devine (Illinois Supreme Court 2023, 237 N.E.3d 429)“…nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b), (f) (West 2018)). The court se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Are Deepfakes Illegal in Illinois? 720 ILCS 5/11-23.7 (2027), Illinois Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet
United States Code Title 47
§ 230Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive materialIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
The Congress finds the following: The rapidly developing array of Internet and other interactive computer services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens. These services offer users a great degree of control over the information that they receive, as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops. The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity. The Internet and other interactive computer services have flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a minimum of government regulation. Increasingly Americans are relying on interactive media for a variety of political, educational, cultural, and entertainment services.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 853 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2009, 591 F.3d 250)“…cation of information created and developed by others.2 See 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1), (e)(3), & (f)(3); Zeran v. Am. O…”
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 521 U.S. 844)“…entitled "Online Family Empowerment." See 110 Stat. 137 , 47 U. S. C. § 230 (1994 ed., Supp. II); 141 Cong. Rec. 2…”
- Doe v. MySpace, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2008, 528 F.3d 413)“…aims were barred by the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), 47 U.S.C § 230, and Texas common law. For the followin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ninth Circuit: Section 230 Is a Defense, Not Immunity From Suit, xAI Sues Grok User Over Alleged AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material, New York Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections
Sources and References
- 720 ILCS 5/26-4 - Unauthorized video recording and live video transmission(ilga.gov).gov
- 740 ILCS 14 - Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/14-2 - Elements of Eavesdropping Offense(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/14-6 - Civil Remedies for Eavesdropping(ilga.gov).gov
- 730 ILCS 150 - Sex Offender Registration Act(ilga.gov).gov
- 47 U.S.C. 230 - Communications Decency Act Section 230(law.cornell.edu)
- 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 - Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images(ilga.gov).gov
- 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55, Class A misdemeanors; sentence(ilga.gov).gov