Illinois
Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Pornography is legal for adults to view and possess privately in Illinois. State law targets obscenity distribution, not private viewing, and unlike many neighboring states, Illinois currently has no enacted law requiring adult websites to verify visitors' ages, though a bill to create one is pending in the legislature.
Is Pornography Legal in Illinois?
Adults may legally view and privately possess sexually explicit material in Illinois. The state's obscenity statute, 720 ILCS 5/11-20, lists specific acts as criminal: selling or providing obscene material, presenting an obscene performance, publishing or making obscene content available, performing obscene acts for compensation, creating or possessing obscene matter with intent to disseminate it, and advertising material as obscene. Its possession clause reaches only material kept "with intent to disseminate" it. Simple possession without that intent is not on the list.
This tracks the private-possession baseline the U.S. Supreme Court set in Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), which held that a state cannot criminalize the private possession of obscene material in a person's own home. That baseline applies to adult obscenity. It does not extend to child sexual abuse material, which Illinois criminalizes regardless of intent to distribute, covered separately below.
Illinois Obscenity Law and Distribution Rules
Under 720 ILCS 5/11-20, obscenity is a Class A misdemeanor for a first offense and a Class 4 felony for a second or subsequent offense. A conviction on a second or later offense also exposes the defendant to property forfeiture under Article 124B of the Illinois Code of Criminal Procedure. Illinois law allows courts to infer intent to disseminate from possession of more than three copies of obscene material, or from possessing equipment specially designed for reproducing it.
Illinois courts apply the three-part Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), test to determine obscenity: whether the material appeals to the prurient interest under contemporary community standards, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value taken as a whole.
Federal record-keeping requirements under 18 U.S.C. 2257, which require producers of sexually explicit content to verify and document performers' ages, are a federal obligation, not an Illinois state requirement. Producers operating in Illinois remain bound by the federal rule regardless of state law.
Material harmful to minors is a separate, narrower category. 720 ILCS 5/11-21 makes it a Class A misdemeanor, escalating to a Class 4 felony on a second or subsequent offense, to knowingly sell, lend, distribute, exhibit, or give away material to a person known or reasonably should be known to be under 18, where the material predominantly appeals to the prurient interest of minors, is patently offensive by adult-community standards as to what is suitable for minors, and lacks serious value for minors taken as a whole.
Illinois Has No Adult-Site Age-Verification Law Yet
Unlike a growing list of states, Illinois has not enacted a law requiring commercial adult websites to verify visitors' ages, as of this writing. A bill that would create one, SB 3945 (the Adult Content Age Verification Act), was introduced in the 104th General Assembly by Senator Erica Harriss and seven co-sponsors. As of May 22, 2026, the bill's status shows it was re-referred to the Assignments committee under Senate Rule 3-9(a) after missing a procedural deadline, which effectively stalled it for that legislative track without formally killing it. A related bill, SB 2082, contains similar provisions and is also pending. If enacted, SB 3945 would require commercial entities publishing material harmful to minors online, where the site contains a substantial portion of such material, to perform reasonable age verification, with Attorney General enforcement and civil penalties of $5,000 per day of noncompliance plus up to $10,000 for knowing violations.

Because no porn-specific age-verification law is currently in force, mainstream adult sites have not geo-blocked Illinois the way they have blocked states with an enacted requirement. That could change if SB 3945 or a similar bill advances in a future session.
Illinois does have a related but distinct law worth not confusing with adult-content age verification: Public Act 104-0664, the Children's Online Social Media Safety Act, signed July 31, 2026. It requires operating-system providers to offer an age or birth-date setup interface and expose an age-bracket signal to apps, so that platforms can apply default minor protections such as blocking adult viewing of minor accounts and restricting algorithmic feeds without parental consent, with duties phasing in no later than January 1, 2028. That law governs social media and app-store age signals. It does not require pornography sites to verify age and is enforced by the Attorney General with no private right of action.
AI-Generated and Computer-Made Depictions of a Purported Child
Illinois separately criminalizes obscene sexual depictions that look like a real child but need not be one. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4, obscene depiction of a purported child, took effect January 1, 2025 and reaches computer-generated, altered, and otherwise synthetic imagery. A "purported child" is a visual representation depicting an individual indistinguishable from an actual child under 18, whether or not an actual child is depicted, and "indistinguishable" means an ordinary person viewing it would conclude it shows a real child. The depiction must also be obscene under the three-part standard the statute spells out.
The offense splits along the same receive-versus-distribute line as the child sexual abuse material statute. Receiving, obtaining, or accessing such a depiction with intent to view is a Class 3 felony, and a Class 2 felony on a second or subsequent offense. Reproducing, disseminating, offering to disseminate, exhibiting, or possessing it with intent to disseminate is a Class 1 felony, and a Class X felony on a second or subsequent offense. Where the purported child is indistinguishable from a child under 13, the receiving offense becomes a Class 2 felony, rising to Class 1 on a repeat, and the dissemination offense becomes a Class X felony, carrying a mandatory minimum of nine years on a repeat. The statute expressly does not impose liability on an interactive computer service, a mobile or private radio service provider, or a telecommunications or broadband provider solely for content another person supplied.
Child Sexual Abuse Material (Child Pornography) Penalties in Illinois
720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 criminalizes producing, disseminating, and possessing child sexual abuse material. Illinois renamed this offense effective January 1, 2026: the statute's own text states that the word "pornography" implied a legality involving consent "of which this imagery is not, as children can never 'consent' to sexual abuse and sexual exploitation," and the section is now titled "Child sexual abuse material." The name change did not alter the definitions or the penalties. Those penalties that scale by the form of the material, the conduct involved, and the age of the depicted child. Production of still images is a Class 1 felony; production involving film, videotape, or another moving depiction is a Class X felony. Dissemination follows the same split: a Class 1 felony for still images, a Class X felony when video is involved. Possession is a Class 3 felony for still images and a Class 2 felony when video is involved. Every tier carries a mandatory minimum fine, generally $1,000 to $2,000, up to a $100,000 maximum. When the depicted child is under 13, penalties escalate further: production, dissemination, and live-performance offenses all become Class X felonies, and possession becomes a Class 2 felony. A repeat offender involving a victim under 13 faces a Class X felony with a mandatory minimum of nine years for the production, dissemination, and live-performance offenses, and a Class 1 felony for possession. Possession never reaches Class X. The statute also makes each individual image a single and separate violation, which multiplies the number of counts rather than raising the felony class.
For minors sharing images of themselves or each other, sometimes called teen sexting, Illinois treats that conduct differently from adult-perpetrated child sexual abuse material charges. See Illinois Sexting Laws for that separate framework; it is not duplicated here.
Non-Consensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images
720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 makes it a Class 4 felony to intentionally disseminate an image of an identifiable person's exposed intimate parts or a person engaged in a sexual act, obtained under circumstances where privacy was reasonably expected, without that person's consent. A conviction also exposes the defendant to forfeiture provisions under Article 124B of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The statute exempts dissemination for lawful criminal investigations, reporting unlawful conduct, images from voluntary public exposure, and disclosures serving a lawful public purpose.
Beyond the criminal charge, Illinois provides a separate civil cause of action under the Civil Remedies for Nonconsensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images Act, 740 ILCS 190, letting a depicted person sue independent of any criminal prosecution.
This is a brief overview. For the fuller framework covering non-consensual intimate image sharing across states, see Revenge Porn Laws by State, which also covers the federal Take It Down Act.
Public Indecency
720 ILCS 5/11-30 makes it a Class A misdemeanor for a person 17 or older to perform an act of sexual penetration or sexual conduct, or a lewd exposure of the body intended to arouse or satisfy sexual desire, in a public place. A third or subsequent violation is a Class 4 felony. The offense also becomes a Class 4 felony when a person 18 or older commits it on or within 500 feet of elementary or secondary school grounds while children are present. Breastfeeding an infant is expressly excluded from the statute.

Adult Entertainment Facility Surcharge and Zoning
Illinois regulates adult entertainment through a tax mechanism and a zoning floor rather than a single licensing statute. The Live Adult Entertainment Facility Surcharge Act, 35 ILCS 175/, requires an operator that both serves or permits alcohol and has offered nude or semi-nude sexually oriented entertainment in the preceding 30 days, operating at least 30 days a year, to pay an annual state surcharge. The operator pays either $3 per patron admitted or a flat fee scaled to gross receipts, ranging from $5,000 for facilities under $500,000 in receipts to $25,000 for facilities at $2 million or more. Proceeds fund the Sexual Assault Services and Prevention Fund, which grants money to sexual-assault victim-services organizations through the Department of Human Services.
Separately, 55 ILCS 5/5-1097.5 restricts where an adult entertainment facility, defined as a striptease club, pornographic theater, or an adult bookstore or video store whose primary business is selling or distributing sexually explicit material, may locate in unincorporated county areas. The general rule bars such a facility within 3,000 feet of a school, early care and education center, cemetery, public park, forest preserve, public housing, place of religious worship, or residence. In a county with more than 800,000 and fewer than 2,000,000 inhabitants, the distance extends to one mile from the same list of uses except residence, which remains protected only under the 3,000-foot standard. Cook County, with roughly 5.1 million residents, falls outside that population band and is reached instead by a separate clause of the same statute, which provides that "notwithstanding any other requirements of this Section" the one-mile setback also applies to those uses located in the area of Cook County outside the City of Chicago. The practical result is the same one-mile distance, but it comes from its own standalone provision rather than from the population bracket. Illinois municipalities are separately authorized to license, tax, and regulate adult-use facilities within their own boundaries, layered on top of these state floors.
Penalties at a Glance
| Offense | Citation | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Obscenity, 1st offense / 2nd or subsequent offense | 720 ILCS 5/11-20 | Class A misdemeanor / Class 4 felony |
| Distributing material harmful to minors, 1st / 2nd or subsequent offense | 720 ILCS 5/11-21 | Class A misdemeanor / Class 4 felony |
| Child sexual abuse material, production or dissemination (still image) | 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 | Class 1 felony |
| Child sexual abuse material, production or dissemination (video) | 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 | Class X felony |
| Child sexual abuse material, possession (still image / video) | 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 | Class 3 felony / Class 2 felony |
| Obscene depiction of a purported child, receiving or accessing / disseminating | 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4 | Class 3 felony / Class 1 felony |
| Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images | 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 | Class 4 felony |
| Public indecency, 1st or 2nd offense / 3rd or subsequent offense | 720 ILCS 5/11-30 | Class A misdemeanor / Class 4 felony |
| Live adult entertainment facility surcharge non-payment | 35 ILCS 175/ | Civil and tax enforcement |
| Pending: adult-site age-verification noncompliance | SB 3945 (not yet enacted) | Would be civil, AG-enforced, $5,000 per day plus up to $10,000 additional |
Practical Considerations
Illinois's absence of a porn-specific age-verification law does not mean adult content is unregulated in the state. Obscenity distribution, harmful-to-minors dissemination, and child sexual abuse material statutes remain fully enforceable, and SB 3945's pending status means the landscape could shift with little notice. Federal law, including 18 U.S.C. 2257 record-keeping and federal CSAM statutes, applies to producers and distributors regardless of what Illinois law does or does not require. Workplace acceptable-use policies and network administrator controls can also restrict access to lawful adult content independent of state law.

This article provides general legal information about Illinois law and is not legal advice. Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
More Illinois Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to watch pornography in Illinois?
No. 720 ILCS 5/11-20 criminalizes distributing or exhibiting obscene material, and possessing it with intent to disseminate, but not privately viewing or possessing it as an adult without that intent.
Does Illinois require adult websites to verify a visitor's age?
Not currently. Illinois has no enacted age-verification law specific to pornography sites as of 2026. A bill, SB 3945, would create one, but it stalled in the Senate Assignments committee after missing a procedural deadline in May 2026.
Is Illinois's Children's Online Social Media Safety Act the same as a porn age-verification law?
No. Public Act 104-0664 requires operating-system providers to expose age-bracket signals for social media and app-store use. It does not require pornography websites to verify visitors' ages and is a separate law from the still-pending adult-content bill, SB 3945.
What are the penalties for child pornography in Illinois?
Illinois renamed this offense child sexual abuse material effective January 1, 2026, and 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 still sets the penalties. Production or dissemination is a Class 1 felony for still images and a Class X felony when video is involved. Possession is a Class 3 felony for still images and a Class 2 felony for video, rising to a Class 2 felony when the depicted child is under 13. Possession never reaches Class X.
Does Illinois have a law against revenge porn?
Yes. 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 makes non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images a Class 4 felony, and a separate civil remedy is available under 740 ILCS 190, the Civil Remedies for Nonconsensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images Act.
Can adult bookstores and strip clubs operate anywhere in Illinois?
No. Illinois restricts where adult entertainment facilities can locate in unincorporated county areas, generally 3,000 feet from schools, parks, and similar uses, extending to one mile in the state's largest counties. Municipalities separately license and zone these businesses within city limits, and facilities that combine alcohol service with nude entertainment owe an annual state surcharge.
Is federal recordkeeping under 18 U.S.C. 2257 an Illinois state requirement?
No. Record-keeping obligations for producers of sexually explicit content under 18 U.S.C. 2257 are federal, not imposed by Illinois law. They apply to producers operating in Illinois regardless of the state's own obscenity statute.
Updates
Corrected the child sexual abuse material section to use the statute's current official name and fixed the possession penalty range in the key takeaways, clarified that Cook County's one-mile adult-entertainment setback comes from its own clause rather than the county population bracket, and added coverage of 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4 on obscene depictions of a purported child.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 720, Act 5 (Criminal Code of 2012)
§ 11-20ObscenityIn force
(a) Elements of the Offense. A person commits obscenity when, with knowledge of the nature or content thereof, or recklessly failing to exercise reasonable inspection which would have disclosed the nature or content thereof, he or she: (1) Sells, delivers or provides, or offers or agrees to sell, deliver or provide any obscene writing, picture, record or other representation or embodiment of the obscene; or (2) Presents or directs an obscene play, dance or other performance or participates directly in that portion thereof which makes it obscene; or (3) Publishes, exhibits or otherwise makes available anything obscene; or (4) Performs an obscene act or otherwise presents an obscene exhibition of his or her body for gain; or (5) Creates, buys, procures or possesses obscene matter or material with intent to disseminate it in violation of this Section, or of the penal laws or regulations of any other jurisdiction; or (6) Advertises or otherwise promotes the sale of material represented or held out by him or her to be obscene, whether or not it is obscene. (b) Obscene Defined.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
§ 11-20.1Child sexual abuse materialIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) Recognizing the enormous negative societal impact that sexually explicit visual depictions of children engaged in sexual abuse activities have on the children who are abused, and the overarching broader impact these materials and imagery have at various levels to the public, especially when this material is disseminated, we are changing all references in Illinois statutes from "child pornography" to "child sexual abuse material". It is important that the statutes of the State of Illinois reflect the content and realities of these materials as the sexual abuse and exploitation of children. The word "pornography" implied legality involving "consent" of which this imagery is not, as children can never "consent" to sexual abuse and sexual exploitation. This name change is not a change in meaning, definitions, statutes or application of the laws of this State and all previous references to "child pornography" are now encapsulated in "child sexual abuse materials".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 161 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Hollins (Illinois Supreme Court 2012, 971 N.E.2d 504)“…(a)(1)(ii) and (a)(4) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/11-20.1(a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), (a)(4) (West 2008…”
- People v. Lamborn (Illinois Supreme Court 1999, 185 Ill. 2d 585)“…wd" for purposes of the Illinois child pornography statute. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 (West 1996). We hold that two of the fi…”
- People v. Gumila (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 981 N.E.2d 507)“…was convicted of possession of child pornography (720 ILCS 5/11-20.1(a)(6) (West 2008)). The physical eviden…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Illinois Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Illinois Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 11-21Harmful materialIn force
(a) As used in this Section: "Distribute" means to transfer possession of, whether with or without consideration. "Harmful to minors" means that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sado-masochistic abuse, when, taken as a whole, it (i) predominately appeals to the prurient interest in sex of minors, (ii) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community in the State as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors, and (iii) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. "Knowingly" means having knowledge of the contents of the subject matter, or recklessly failing to exercise reasonable inspection which would have disclosed the contents. "Material" means (i) any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, film, video game, computer game, video or similar visual depiction, including any such representation or image which is stored electronically, or (ii) any book, magazine, printed matter however reproduced, or recorded audio of any sort. "Minor" means any person under the age of 18.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Ward (Illinois Supreme Court 2005, 215 Ill. 2d 317)“…the offense of distribution of harmful material to a minor (720 ILCS 5/11-21 (West 2000)) and sentenced to 12 months…”
- People v. Jackson (Appellate Court of Illinois 2005, 358 Ill. App. 3d 927)“…in violation of section 11-21 of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/11-21 (West 2000)), and sentenced to six mont…”
- People v. Melvin (Appellate Court of Illinois 2023, 2023 IL App (4th) 220405)“…lty to distribution of harmful material, a Class 4 felony (720 ILCS 5/11-21(g) (West 2020)), and sexual exploitatio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 11-23.5Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual imagesIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this Section: "Computer", "computer program", and "data" have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 17-0.5 of this Code. "Image" includes a photograph, film, videotape, digital recording, or other depiction or portrayal of an object, including a human body. "Intimate parts" means the fully unclothed, partially unclothed or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, anus, or if the person is female, a partially or fully exposed nipple, including exposure through transparent clothing. "Personal identifying information" has the meaning ascribed to the term in Section 16-0.1. "Sexual act" means sexual penetration, masturbation, or sexual activity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Austin (Illinois Supreme Court 2019, 2019 IL 123910)“…ating section 11-23.5(b) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b) (West 2016)), which criminalizes…”
- People v. Moeller (Appellate Court of Illinois 2024, 2024 IL App (2d) 230043)“…on of section 11-23.5 of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 (West 2016)). The court specifically fo…”
- People v. Devine (Illinois Supreme Court 2023, 237 N.E.3d 429)“…nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b), (f) (West 2018)). The court se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Video Recording Laws: Consent, BIPA, and Surveillance Rules (2026), Illinois Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and BIPA Rules (2026)
§ 11-30Public indecencyIn force
(a) Any person of the age of 17 years and upwards who performs any of the following acts in a public place commits a public indecency: (1) An act of sexual penetration or sexual conduct; or (2) A lewd exposure of the body done with intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desire of the person. Breast-feeding of infants is not an act of public indecency. (b) "Public place" for purposes of this Section means any place where the conduct may reasonably be expected to be viewed by others. (c) Sentence. Public indecency is a Class A misdemeanor. A person convicted of a third or subsequent violation for public indecency is guilty of a Class 4 felony. Public indecency is a Class 4 felony if committed by a person 18 years of age or older who is on or within 500 feet of elementary or secondary school grounds when children are present on the grounds.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Fretch (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2017 IL App (2d) 151107)“…20 ILCS 5/11-9.1(a)(2) (West 2014)), public indecency (720 ILCS 5/11-30(a)(2) (West 2014)), and disorderly cond…”
- People v. Assmar (Appellate Court of Illinois 2020, 2020 IL App (2d) 180253)“…11-30(a)(2) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Criminal Code) (720 ILCS 5/11-30(a)(2), (c) (West 2016)) provides that a…”
- People v. Contreras (Appellate Court of Illinois 2021, 2021 IL App (1st) 180493-U)“…0493 or gratification *** .”)) and public indecency (see 720 ILCS 5/11-30(a)(2) (West 2018) (“Any person of the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 11-20.4Obscene depiction of a purported childIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) In this Section: "Indistinguishable" means that the visual representation is such that an ordinary person viewing the visual representation would conclude that the visual representation is of an actual child. "Obscene depiction" means a visual representation of any kind, including an image, video, or computer-generated image or video, whether made, produced, or altered by electronic, mechanical, or other means, that: (i) the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, would find that, taken as a whole, it appeals to the prurient interest; (ii) the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, would find that it depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual acts or sadomasochistic sexual acts, whether normal or perverted, actual or simulated, or masturbation, excretory functions, or lewd exhibition of the unclothed or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks or, if such person is a female, the fully or partially developed breast of the child or other person; and (iii) taken as a whole, it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 2257Record keeping requirementsIn forcecited in 34 of our articles
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which— contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 68 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (1998) affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction against section 2257. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012) reviewed it as content neutral under intermediate scrutiny, a standard the Third Circuit later replaced with strict scrutiny.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…rformers with independent penalties for failure to comply. 18 U. S. C. §§ 2257 (a) and (i) (1988 ed. and Supp. V); Am…”
- Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 154 F.3d 281)✓A swingers magazine that ran readers' sexually explicit ads challenged section 2257's age record and labeling duties; the court treated the statute as content neutral, found no substantial likelihood of First Amendment success, and affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction.
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2012, 677 F.3d 519)✓Adult film producers, photographers and sex educators challenged section 2257's recordkeeping duties; the court held the statutes content neutral and found they advance protecting children, but vacated dismissal of the First and Fourth Amendment claims for record development.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), West Virginia Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras and Privacy Violations, Pornography Laws by State (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 720 ILCS 5/11-20 - Obscenity(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/11-21 - Harmful material(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 - Child pornography(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 - Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/11-30 - Public indecency(ilga.gov).gov
- 35 ILCS 175/ - Live Adult Entertainment Facility Surcharge Act(tax.illinois.gov).gov
- 55 ILCS 5/5-1097.5 - Adult entertainment facility, unincorporated area restrictions(ilga.gov).gov
- SB 3945 - Adult Content Age Verification Act, bill status(ilga.gov).gov
- Public Act 104-0664 (HB 5511) - Children's Online Social Media Safety Act, full text(ilga.gov).gov
- Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)(law.cornell.edu)
- Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)(law.cornell.edu)
- 720 ILCS 5/11-20.4 - Obscene depiction of a purported child(ilga.gov)