Illinois
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Illinois? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Illinois abolished discretionary parole in 1978, so for an adult offender a life sentence under 730 ILCS 5/5-8-1 is natural life without the possibility of parole. The exception is youthful parole review: a person under 21 at the time of a first-degree murder who was sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 can seek Prisoner Review Board parole review after 40 years of a natural life sentence (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115). Truth-in-Sentencing requires first-degree murder sentences to be served in full.
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, and sentencing data have been verified against current Illinois government sources.
In Illinois, a life sentence for an adult offender means exactly what it says: life in prison without any possibility of parole. There is no hearing after 25 years and no parole board review. The narrow exception is for people who were under 21 at the time of the offense and were sentenced on or after June 1, 2019, who can seek Prisoner Review Board parole review after serving 40 years of a natural life sentence.
Illinois is one of a small group of states, along with Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, and South Dakota, where a life sentence is, with narrow exceptions, life without the possibility of parole (LWOP). Pennsylvania was traditionally counted in this group too, but under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's March 2026 ruling in Commonwealth v. Lee, mandatory LWOP there now applies only to first-degree murder; second-degree (felony) murder in Pennsylvania requires an individualized culpability assessment before LWOP can be imposed. This makes Illinois an outlier in a country where most states offer at least some path to parole for life-sentenced individuals.
Understanding why this is the case requires looking at Illinois's broader sentencing structure, which eliminated discretionary parole decades ago and has layered on increasingly severe sentencing enhancements ever since.
Illinois Life Sentence Statutes
Illinois defines murder and its penalties across several key statutes in the Criminal Code and Unified Code of Corrections.
First-Degree Murder (720 ILCS 5/9-1): A person commits first-degree murder when they kill an individual without lawful justification and they either intend to kill or do great bodily harm, know that their acts create a strong probability of death or great bodily harm, or cause a death during the commission of a forcible felony. The sentencing range is 20 to 60 years in the Illinois Department of Corrections, or natural life imprisonment when statutory aggravating factors are present.
Second-Degree Murder (720 ILCS 5/9-2): A person commits second-degree murder when they commit first-degree murder but mitigating factors are present, either they acted under a sudden and intense passion from serious provocation, or they unreasonably believed circumstances justified the use of deadly force. Second-degree murder is a Class 1 felony carrying 4 to 20 years.
Sentencing for First-Degree Murder (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20): This statute sets the sentence for first-degree murder: 20 to 60 years, 60 to 100 years when an extended term is imposed under Section 5-8-2, or natural life as provided in Section 5-8-1.
Extended-Term Factors (730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2): Subsection (b) lists factors, applicable to all felonies, that allow a court to impose an extended term under Section 5-8-2, which for first-degree murder means 60 to 100 years. One such factor is a felony committed against a person under 12 years of age. This section does not itself authorize natural life imprisonment.
Natural Life Imprisonment (730 ILCS 5/5-8-1): This statute governs when a court shall or may impose a sentence of natural life imprisonment for first-degree murder. For a defendant who was at least 18, natural life is mandatory under subsection (a)(1)(c) for a prior first-degree murder conviction, for murdering more than one victim, or for murdering a peace officer, fireman, or certain other emergency or corrections personnel in connection with their duties. Under subsection (a)(1)(b), a court may impose natural life if the murder was exceptionally brutal or heinous, or if a factor listed in (b-5) is present, such as a murder for hire, a killing during certain violent felonies, or a cold, calculated, and premeditated murder. "Natural life" in Illinois law means the defendant will die in prison absent executive clemency, a successful appeal, or, for people who were under 21 at the time of the offense and were sentenced on or after June 1, 2019, a grant of parole after youthful parole review at 40 years.
Why There Is No Parole in Illinois
This is the single most important feature of Illinois's sentencing system and the reason life sentences carry such absolute finality in the state.

The Abolition of Discretionary Parole (1978)
Illinois abolished discretionary parole in 1978, becoming the fourth state in the nation to do so. Under the old indeterminate sentencing system, a judge would impose a range of years, and a parole board would decide when an inmate had served enough time. The legislature replaced this with determinate sentencing (fixed terms set by the judge at the time of conviction).
The theory was straightforward: fixed sentences would be more fair, more predictable, and more transparent. Everyone would know exactly how long a sentence meant. In practice, this eliminated any mechanism for release before the sentence was served, except for earned good-conduct credits.
Truth-in-Sentencing Laws
Starting in the 1990s, Illinois layered Truth-in-Sentencing (TIS) requirements on top of the determinate sentencing structure. These laws restrict the amount of sentence credit an inmate can earn, forcing longer actual time served.
Under TIS, individuals convicted of first-degree murder must serve 100 percent of their sentence. There is no good-time reduction. There is no credit for programming. Every day of a 60-year murder sentence must be served.
For other violent offenses, TIS requires 85 percent of the sentence to be served. For less serious offenses, the requirement drops to 75 percent or lower.
What This Means for Life Sentences
Because Illinois has no general parole system, a life sentence is, for most people, exactly that: life. The ways a person serving a life sentence in Illinois can be released are:
- Executive clemency from the Governor of Illinois
- A successful court appeal resulting in a new trial or resentencing
- Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing under SB 2129 (since 2022)
- Youthful parole review under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115, for people who were under 21 at the time of the offense and were sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 (after 40 years on a natural life sentence)
Outside that youthful parole review, there is no parole board hearing and no automatic review after a set number of years. The Illinois Prisoner Review Board handles mandatory supervised release (the equivalent of post-release supervision) and certain clemency recommendations, and it conducts the youthful parole reviews under Section 5-4.5-115; it does not otherwise grant parole to life-sentenced individuals.
Abolition of the Death Penalty: A Landmark Story
Illinois's path to abolishing the death penalty is one of the most dramatic in American legal history. It unfolded over more than a decade and involved two governors, mass commutations, exonerations that shook public confidence, and ultimately, legislative action.

The Moratorium and Governor Ryan's Commutations (2000-2003)
In January 2000, Republican Governor George Ryan declared a moratorium on executions in Illinois after 13 death row inmates were exonerated. More people had been freed from Illinois's death row than had been executed since the state reinstated the death penalty in 1977.
Ryan appointed a Commission on Capital Punishment to study the system. The commission's 2002 report identified numerous flaws and recommended 85 reforms.
On January 11, 2003, just two days before leaving office, Governor Ryan took the extraordinary step of commuting the sentences of all 167 death row inmates to life in prison. He also pardoned four inmates outright (Aaron Patterson, Leroy Orange, Madison Hobley, and Stanley Howard) based on evidence of police torture.
Ryan called the state's death penalty system "haunted by the demon of error" and declared he could not leave office knowing that the system remained fundamentally broken.
This was the largest mass commutation in modern American history, accounting for roughly two-thirds of all death penalty commutations nationally since 1976. Ryan died on May 2, 2025, at age 91, and his obituaries universally led with his death penalty legacy.
Governor Quinn Signs Abolition (2011)
On March 9, 2011, Democratic Governor Pat Quinn signed Public Act 96-1543 into law, abolishing the death penalty in Illinois effective July 1, 2011. Quinn also commuted the death sentences of the 15 inmates remaining on death row to life without parole.
Quinn described the decision as "the most difficult" of his career. He consulted with families of murder victims, law enforcement, religious leaders, and legal scholars before signing.
Illinois became the 16th state to abolish capital punishment.
Illinois's Last Execution
Illinois's last execution took place on March 17, 1999, when Andrew Kokoraleis was put to death by lethal injection at Tamms Correctional Center. Kokoraleis was a member of the "Ripper Crew," a group convicted of a series of brutal murders in the Chicago area in the early 1980s. He was 34 years old.
In total, Illinois executed 12 people between the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1977 and the 2000 moratorium.
Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing (PIR)
In July 2021, Governor Pritzker signed Senate Bill 2129, creating a Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing program in Illinois. The law took effect on January 1, 2022.
Under SB 2129, a State's Attorney may petition the sentencing court to resentence an incarcerated person if the original sentence "no longer advances the interests of justice." The court may then resentence the defendant to a lesser term, considering post-conviction factors such as prison conduct, evidence of rehabilitation, and reduced risk due to age or physical condition.
Illinois is one of five states with PIR laws, alongside California, Washington, Oregon, and Minnesota.
Limitations of PIR
The program has been slow to produce results. The first person freed under the law in Illinois, Charles Patton, a Chicago man, was not released until 2023, more than 18 months after the law took effect. The State's Attorney has complete discretion over who is selected for resentencing review, and that decision is not reviewable by any court or agency.
As of early 2024, only two people in Illinois had been released through PIR. Critics have noted that implementation has been narrow, and judges have sometimes rejected resentencing motions. Nevertheless, PIR is one of the few structural mechanisms, alongside executive clemency and youthful parole review, for revisiting a life sentence in Illinois.
Notable Illinois Cases
Jason Van Dyke: Laquan McDonald Shooting (2018)

On October 20, 2014, Chicago Police Officer Jason Van Dyke shot 17-year-old Laquan McDonald 16 times on a Southwest Side street. Dashcam video, released more than a year later under court order, showed McDonald walking away from officers when Van Dyke opened fire. The video's release sparked massive protests and a federal investigation of the Chicago Police Department.
Van Dyke was convicted of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm on October 5, 2018. He was sentenced to 81 months (six years and nine months) in January 2019. Van Dyke served approximately three years and four months before being released for good behavior in February 2022.
The sentence was widely criticized as lenient. Data analysis showed that Van Dyke received a shorter sentence than the average for second-degree murder in Illinois.
Drew Peterson: Murder of Kathleen Savio (2012)
Former Bolingbrook police sergeant Drew Peterson was convicted in 2012 of the first-degree murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio, whose body was found in a dry bathtub in 2004. Her death was initially ruled an accidental drowning but was reinvestigated after Peterson's fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, disappeared in 2007 and has never been found.
Peterson was sentenced to 38 years in prison on February 21, 2013. The case was notable for the use of hearsay testimony under "Drew's Law", legislation passed specifically to allow statements made by unavailable witnesses in cases where the defendant caused the witness's unavailability.
R. Kelly: Federal Convictions (2021-2022)
Chicago R&B singer R. Kelly was convicted in federal court in Brooklyn in September 2021 on racketeering and sex trafficking charges and sentenced to 30 years in prison. In a separate federal trial in Chicago in 2022, Kelly was convicted of three counts of producing child pornography and three counts of enticing a minor, receiving an additional 20 years, though 19 years run concurrently with the New York sentence, adding just one effective year.
While Kelly's cases were prosecuted in federal court under federal sentencing guidelines, his crimes originated in Illinois and the cases illustrate the intersection of state and federal jurisdiction in high-profile Illinois criminal matters.
Recent Legislative Changes
SAFE-T Act (2021, HB 3653)
The Safety, Accountability, Fairness and Equity-Today (SAFE-T) Act was signed by Governor Pritzker on February 22, 2021. This comprehensive criminal justice reform package included several provisions affecting sentencing:
- Expanded sentencing credits: The IDOC Director can award up to 180 days of earned credit for sentences under 5 years and up to 365 days for sentences of 5 years or longer.
- Reduced mandatory supervised release: Eliminated mandatory supervised release for Class 3 and 4 felonies in certain cases.
- Modernized credit-earning programs: Credits available for substance abuse treatment, educational programs, vocational training, and other programming.
These credit changes do not apply to first-degree murder sentences, which remain subject to Truth-in-Sentencing at 100 percent.
Pretrial Fairness Act: End of Cash Bail (2023)
As part of the SAFE-T Act, Illinois's Pretrial Fairness Act took effect on September 18, 2023, making Illinois the first state in the nation to eliminate cash bail entirely. Under the new system, judges determine pretrial detention based on risk assessment rather than a defendant's ability to pay.
The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Pretrial Fairness Act in July 2023. First-year data showed no increase in violent or property crime following implementation.
Youthful Parole Review for Natural Life (Public Act 102-1128)
Illinois's youthful parole law, 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115, was created by Public Act 100-1182 (effective June 1, 2019). It gives people who were under 21 at the time of the offense and were sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 a Prisoner Review Board parole review: after 20 years for most first-degree murder sentences and after 10 years for most other offenses. Public Act 102-1128 extended that review to people serving natural life, who become eligible after 40 years. For this group, including juveniles, a natural life sentence no longer means life without the possibility of parole.
The review applies only to people sentenced on or after June 1, 2019; it does not reach earlier sentences. Before the U.S. Supreme Court's 2012 Miller v. Alabama decision, approximately 100 children in Illinois had been sentenced to LWOP. As of late 2023, nearly 70 had received resentencing hearings and just over 50 had been released.
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2023 | Cash bail eliminated (Pretrial Fairness Act, 2023) |
| 2022 | Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing (SB 2129) takes effect |
| 2021 | SAFE-T Act signed (HB 3653): sentencing credit reforms |
| 2019 | Youthful parole review created for people under 21 at the time of the offense (Public Act 100-1182, effective June 1, 2019) |
| 2011 | Death penalty abolished (Public Act 96-1543); 15 death row sentences commuted |
| 2003 | Gov. Ryan commutes all 167 death row sentences; pardons 4 inmates |
| 2000 | Gov. Ryan declares moratorium on executions |
| 1999 | Last execution in Illinois (Andrew Kokoraleis) |
| 1998 | Truth-in-Sentencing fully implemented for murder (100% time served) |
| 1978 | Discretionary parole abolished; determinate sentencing adopted |
Juvenile Life Sentences in Illinois
Illinois has taken significant steps to reform juvenile sentencing, though the journey has been gradual.
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Miller v. Alabama (2012) held that mandatory LWOP for juveniles violates the Eighth Amendment. Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016) made that ruling retroactive.
Illinois went further. Since June 1, 2019, 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115 has given people who were under 21 at the time of the offense (not only juveniles) parole review after a set number of years, and Public Act 102-1128 extended that review to natural life sentences after 40 years. This reflects growing recognition of brain development research showing that the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control, decision-making, and long-term planning, does not fully mature until the mid-20s.
Under current Illinois law, juvenile offenders convicted in adult court must receive individualized sentencing that accounts for their age, maturity, and capacity for rehabilitation. The Restore Justice Foundation has been a leading advocacy organization in this effort.
Historical Context
Illinois's evolution on life sentencing and capital punishment reflects broader national shifts, but with several distinctly Illinois characteristics.
The indeterminate era (pre-1978): Before 1978, Illinois used indeterminate sentencing with parole board discretion. A life sentence could lead to parole after a set minimum, and a parole board decided when release was appropriate. This system was seen as giving too much unaccountable power to parole boards.
Determinate sentencing (1978): Illinois adopted determinate sentencing, replacing parole with fixed terms. The intent was fairness and predictability. Instead, over the following decades, the legislature steadily increased sentence lengths and added mandatory minimums.
The tough-on-crime era (1980s-1990s): Like much of the nation, Illinois enacted harsher sentencing laws during this period. Truth-in-Sentencing, mandatory minimums, and sentence enhancements for firearms and gang-related offenses dramatically increased average time served. The average sentence for many crimes doubled or tripled.
The exoneration crisis (1990s-2000s): Illinois became a national flashpoint for wrongful convictions. Between 1987 and 2003, 13 people on death row were exonerated, largely through the work of journalism students and law school innocence projects at Northwestern University. These exonerations provided the impetus for Governor Ryan's moratorium and eventual mass commutation.
The reform era (2011-present): Since abolishing the death penalty, Illinois has enacted a series of criminal justice reforms: sentencing credit expansions, the elimination of cash bail, the JLWOP ban, and Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing. However, the fundamental structure (determinate sentencing with no parole for the vast majority of inmates) remains intact. Organizations like Parole Illinois continue to advocate for restoring discretionary parole.
Illinois Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Life sentence meaning | LWOP for adult offenders; under-21 offenders sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 get parole review after 40 years |
| Parole system | Abolished in 1978, except youthful parole review for under-21 offenders (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115) |
| First-degree murder range | 20–60 years, or natural life |
| Truth-in-Sentencing (murder) | 100% of sentence must be served |
| Death penalty | Abolished (2011, Public Act 96-1543) |
| Last execution | March 17, 1999 (Andrew Kokoraleis) |
| Youthful parole review | Under 21 at the offense and sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115; natural life added by Public Act 102-1128) |
| PIR available | Yes (SB 2129, effective 2022) |
| Key statutes | 720 ILCS 5/9-1, 720 ILCS 5/9-2, 730 ILCS 5/5-8-1, 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20, 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2, 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115 |
| Prisoner Review Board | Illinois PRB (clemency, MSR, and youthful parole review) |
| Cash bail | Eliminated (2023, first state in U.S.) |
Related Pages
- How Long Is a Life Sentence? State-by-State Guide
- Murder Sentencing Guidelines for Every State
- What Is Capital Murder?
- How Long Is a Life Sentence in Iowa?
- How Long Is a Life Sentence in Pennsylvania?
- How Long Is a Life Sentence in Indiana?
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Illinois?
In Illinois, a life sentence means life without the possibility of parole (LWOP). Illinois is one of a small group of states, along with Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, and South Dakota, and (for first-degree murder only, following a March 2026 court ruling) Pennsylvania, where a life sentence is generally LWOP. For adult offenders there is no parole board hearing and no minimum number of years before eligibility. The exception is youthful parole review: a person under 21 at the time of the offense who was sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 can seek parole review after 40 years of a natural life sentence. Otherwise, the paths to release are executive clemency from the governor, a successful court appeal, or Prosecutor-Initiated Resentencing under SB 2129.
Does Illinois have parole?
Not in general. Illinois abolished discretionary parole in 1978 and replaced it with determinate sentencing. The main exception is youthful parole review under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115: people who were under 21 at the time of the offense and were sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 can seek Prisoner Review Board parole review after 10, 20, or 40 years depending on the offense and sentence. Otherwise, the Prisoner Review Board handles mandatory supervised release and clemency recommendations rather than parole.
Does Illinois have the death penalty?
No. Illinois abolished the death penalty in 2011 when Governor Pat Quinn signed Public Act 96-1543. The 15 remaining death row inmates had their sentences commuted to life without parole. In 2003, Governor George Ryan had previously commuted the sentences of all 167 death row inmates to life terms. Illinois's last execution was on March 17, 1999.
What is the sentence for first-degree murder in Illinois?
First-degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9-1) carries a sentence of 20 to 60 years in prison, 60 to 100 years with an extended term, or natural life imprisonment under 730 ILCS 5/5-8-1. Natural life is mandatory for an adult defendant with a prior first-degree murder conviction, multiple victims, or the murder of an on-duty peace officer or firefighter, and may be imposed for factors such as a murder committed during certain violent felonies. Extended-term factors under 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2, such as a victim under 12 years of age, can raise the sentence to 60 to 100 years. Under Truth-in-Sentencing, those convicted of first-degree murder must serve 100 percent of their sentence.
Can juveniles get life without parole in Illinois?
Not for anyone sentenced on or after June 1, 2019. Under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115, as amended by Public Act 102-1128, a person who was under 21 at the time of a first-degree murder and received natural life can seek Prisoner Review Board parole review after 40 years, and most other under-21 first-degree murder sentences are reviewable after 20 years. The law does not reach sentences imposed before June 1, 2019, though many previously sentenced juveniles have received resentencing hearings under the U.S. Supreme Court's Miller v. Alabama (2012) ruling.
Updates
Punctuation restored where an automated edit had produced comma splices.
Corrected the page to explain that people under 21 at the time of the offense and sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 can receive parole review, including after 40 years on a natural life sentence, and corrected which statute sets natural-life versus extended-term factors.
Updated the page's 'six states with automatic life without parole' comparison to reflect that Pennsylvania's mandatory LWOP rule now applies only to first-degree murder after a March 2026 state supreme court ruling, and clarified that Illinois's juvenile-LWOP ban (Public Act 102-1128) was signed in 2023 but did not take effect until January 1, 2024.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 730, Act 5 (Unified Code of Corrections)
§ 5-8-1Natural life imprisonment; enhancements for use of a firearm; mandatory supervised release termsIn force
(a) Except as otherwise provided in the statute defining the offense or in Article 4.5 of Chapter V, a sentence of imprisonment for a felony shall be a determinate sentence set by the court under this Section, subject to Section 5-4.5-115 of this Code, according to the following limitations: (1) for first degree murder, (a) (blank), (b) if a trier of fact finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the murder was accompanied by exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty or, except as set forth in subsection (a)(1)(c) of this Section, that any of the aggravating factors listed in subparagraph (b-5) are present, the court may sentence the defendant, subject to Section 5-4.5-105, to a term of natural life imprisonment, or (b-5) a defendant who at the time of the commission of the offense has attained the age of 18 or more and who has been found guilty of first degree murder may be sentenced to a term of natural life imprisonment if: (1) the murdered individual was an inmate at an institution or facility of the Department of Corrections, or any similar local correctional agency and was killed on the grounds thereof, or the murdered individual was otherwise present…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
§ 5-4.5-20FIRST DEGREE MURDER; SENTENCEIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
For first degree murder: (a) TERM. The defendant shall be sentenced to imprisonment under Section 9-1 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012. Imprisonment shall be for a determinate term, subject to Section 5-4.5-115 of this Code, of (1) not less than 20 years and not more than 60 years; (2) not less than 60 years and not more than 100 years when an extended term is imposed under Section 5-8-2; or (3) natural life as provided in Section 5-8-1. (b) PERIODIC IMPRISONMENT. A term of periodic imprisonment shall not be imposed. (c) IMPACT INCARCERATION. The impact incarceration program or the county impact incarceration program is not an authorized disposition. (d) PROBATION; CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE. A period of probation or conditional discharge shall not be imposed. (e) FINE. Fines may be imposed as provided in Section 5-4.5-50(b). (f) RESTITUTION. See Section 5-5-6 concerning restitution. (g) CONCURRENT OR CONSECUTIVE SENTENCE. The sentence shall be concurrent or consecutive as provided in Section 5-8-4 and Section 5-4.5-50. (h) DRUG COURT. Drug court is not an authorized disposition. (i) CREDIT FOR HOME DETENTION.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 280 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Spencer (Illinois Supreme Court 2025, 2025 IL 130015)“…harged defendant, Eugene Spencer, with first degree murder (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20(a) (West 2010)), attempted murder (720…”
- People v. Townsend (Appellate Court of Illinois 2022, 2022 IL App (1st) 200911)“…sentencing range for first degree murder is 20 to 60 years. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20(a) (West 2018). However, defendant was…”
- People v. Harris (Illinois Supreme Court 2019, 2018 IL 121932)“…statutory minimums mandated by the legislature. See 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20(a) (West 2012); 720 ILCS 5/8-4(c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Many Years for First Degree Murder?, Illinois Felony Classes and Misdemeanor Penalties (2026)
§ 5-4.5-115Parole review of persons under the age of 21 at the time of the commission of an offenseIn force
(a) For purposes of this Section, "victim" means a victim of a violent crime as defined in subsection (a) of Section 3 of the Rights of Crime Victims and Witnesses Act including a witness as defined in subsection (b) of Section 3 of the Rights of Crime Victims and Witnesses Act; any person legally related to the victim by blood, marriage, adoption, or guardianship; any friend of the victim; or any concerned citizen. (b) A person under 21 years of age at the time of the commission of an offense or offenses, other than first degree murder, and who is not serving a sentence for first degree murder and who is sentenced on or after June 1, 2019 (the effective date of Public Act 100-1182) shall be eligible for parole review by the Prisoner Review Board after serving 10 years or more of his or her sentence or sentences, except for those serving a sentence or sentences for: (1) aggravated criminal sexual assault who shall be eligible for parole review by the Prisoner Review Board after serving 20 years or more of his or her sentence or sentences or (2) predatory criminal sexual assault of a child who shall not be eligible for parole review by the Prisoner Review Board under this Section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 127 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Dorsey (Illinois Supreme Court 2021, 451 Ill. Dec. 258)“…5-4.5- 105(c), 5-8-1(a)(1)(c) (West 2016); see also 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115(b) (West 2020) (declining to ext…”
- People v. Spencer (Illinois Supreme Court 2025, 2025 IL 130015)“…of the Unified Code of Corrections (Code of Corrections) (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115 (West 2020)) precluded his 100-yea…”
- People v. Cavazos (Appellate Court of Illinois 2023, 232 N.E.3d 80)“…on 5-4.5-115(b) of the Unified Code of Corrections (Code) (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115(b) (West 2020)), now offered defendant…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5-5-3.2Factors in aggravation and extended-term sentencingIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The following factors shall be accorded weight in favor of imposing a term of imprisonment or may be considered by the court as reasons to impose a more severe sentence under Section 5-8-1 or Article 4.5 of Chapter V: (1) the defendant's conduct caused or threatened serious harm; (2) the defendant received compensation for committing the offense; (3) the defendant has a history of prior delinquency or criminal activity; (4) the defendant, by the duties of his office or by his position, was obliged to prevent the particular offense committed or to bring the offenders committing it to justice; (5) the defendant held public office at the time of the offense, and the offense related to the conduct of that office; (6) the defendant utilized his professional reputation or position in the community to commit the offense, or to afford him an easier means of committing it; (7) the sentence is necessary to deter others from committing the same crime; (8) the defendant committed the offense against a person 60 years of age or older or such person's property; (9) the defendant committed the offense against a person who has a physical disability or such person's property; (10) by reason of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 580 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Jackson (Illinois Supreme Court 2002, 199 Ill. 2d 286)“…en of proof was merely a preponderance of the evidence. See 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b)(2), 5-8-2(a) (West 1996). She furthe…”
- People v. Heider (Illinois Supreme Court 2008, 231 Ill. 2d 1)“…sons to impose a more severe sentence under Section 5-8-1." 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(a) (West 2002). Mental retardation is n…”
- People v. Ford (Illinois Supreme Court 2001, 198 Ill. 2d 68)“…utal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty." See 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b)(2), 5-8-2(a)(1) (West 1998). Defen…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 720, Act 5 (Criminal Code of 2012)
§ 9-1First degree murderIn force
(a) A person who kills an individual without lawful justification commits first degree murder if, in performing the acts which cause the death: (1) he or she either intends to kill or do great bodily harm to that individual or another, or knows that such acts will cause death to that individual or another; or (2) he or she knows that such acts create a strong probability of death or great bodily harm to that individual or another; or (3) he or she, acting alone or with one or more participants, commits or attempts to commit a forcible felony other than second degree murder, and in the course of or in furtherance of such crime or flight therefrom, he or she or another participant causes the death of a person. (b) (Blank). (b-5) (Blank). (c) (Blank). (d) (Blank). (e) (Blank). (f) (Blank). (g) (Blank). (h) (Blank). (h-5) (Blank). (i) (Blank). (j) (Blank). (k) (Blank).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 2,306 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Hall (Illinois Supreme Court 2000, 194 Ill. 2d 305)“…e Hall, was convicted of two counts of first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9-1(a)(1) (West 1994)). The same jury found…”
- People v. Caffey (Illinois Supreme Court 2001, 205 Ill. 2d 52)“…aggravated kidnapping and murder of Debra's son Joshua. See 720 ILCS 5/9-1(a), 10-2(a) (West 1994). At a separate…”
- People v. Bull (Illinois Supreme Court 1998, 185 Ill. 2d 179)“…micidal deaths, and the aggravated arson of their home. See 720 ILCS 5/9-1(a), 9-3.1(a), 20-1.1(a)(1) (West 1992).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9-2Second degree murderIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person commits the offense of second degree murder when he or she commits the offense of first degree murder as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of Section 9-1 of this Code and either of the following mitigating factors are present: (1) at the time of the killing he or she is acting under a sudden and intense passion resulting from serious provocation by the individual killed or another whom the offender endeavors to kill, but he or she negligently or accidentally causes the death of the individual killed; or (2) at the time of the killing he or she believes the circumstances to be such that, if they existed, would justify or exonerate the killing under the principles stated in Article 7 of this Code, but his or her belief is unreasonable. (b) Serious provocation is conduct sufficient to excite an intense passion in a reasonable person provided, however, that an action that does not otherwise constitute serious provocation cannot qualify as serious provocation because of the discovery, knowledge, or disclosure of the victim's sexual orientation as defined in Section 1-103 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 320 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Hodges (Illinois Supreme Court 2009, 234 Ill. 2d 1)“…ove the elements of section 9-2(a)(2) of the Criminal Code (720 ILCS 5/9-2(a)(2) (West 2006)). Section 9-2(a)(2)…”
- People v. Morgan (Illinois Supreme Court 2001, 197 Ill. 2d 404)“…forth in the second degree murder statute was present. See 720 ILCS 5/9-2(a)(1), (a)(2) (West 1996). The jury the…”
- People v. Lee (Illinois Supreme Court 2004, 213 Ill. 2d 218)“…e circuit court of Sangamon County of second degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9-2 *309 (West 1998)) and two counts of a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Manslaughter Laws: Involuntary, Reckless Homicide and DUI
Sources and References
- 720 ILCS 5/9-1(ilga.gov).gov
- 720 ILCS 5/9-2(ilga.gov).gov
- 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20(codes.findlaw.com)
- 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(codes.findlaw.com)
- 730 ILCS 5/5-8-1(ilga.gov).gov
- Illinois Prisoner Review Board(prb.illinois.gov).gov
- Public Act 96-1543(ilga.gov).gov
- Senate Bill 2129(ilga.gov).gov
- *Miller v. Alabama*(law.cornell.edu).gov
- *Montgomery v. Louisiana*(law.cornell.edu).gov
- Restore Justice Foundation(restorejustice.org)
- Parole Illinois(paroleillinois.org)
- 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-115 (parole review of persons under 21)(ilga.gov)
- 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-20(ilga.gov)
- 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(ilga.gov)
- Public Act 102-1128 (HB 1064)(ilga.gov)