Pennsylvania
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Pennsylvania? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Pennsylvania, a life sentence for an adult offender means life without the possibility of parole. 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102 requires life imprisonment for second-degree murder and for first-degree murder when death is not imposed, and 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1) bars the Parole Board from paroling anyone serving life imprisonment. There are no parole hearings and no minimum term for these sentences; the only paths to release are executive clemency or a successful appeal. The one statutory exception covers people who were under 18 at the time of a first-degree murder (see Juvenile Life Sentences below).
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, and sentencing data have been verified against current Pennsylvania government sources.
Pennsylvania stands apart from nearly every other state in the nation when it comes to life sentences. It is one of only six states where a life sentence for an adult offender means life without the possibility of parole. For adults there are no parole hearings and no minimum terms to serve; the only statutory exception covers people who were under 18 at the time of a first-degree murder (18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1). In Pennsylvania, a life sentence means you will die in prison unless you receive executive clemency or win an appeal.
This makes Pennsylvania's sentencing framework one of the harshest in the country, and one of the most debated. Thousands of inmates are currently serving mandatory LWOP, including many convicted of felony murder who did not personally kill anyone. Reform efforts have gained momentum in recent years, but fundamental change has not yet arrived. The Sentencing Project's report on life and long-term imprisonment identifies Pennsylvania as having one of the largest LWOP populations in the country, driven in part by its mandatory LWOP rule for all first- and second-degree murder convictions.
Pennsylvania Murder Statutes: A Unique System
Pennsylvania's murder classification system is unlike that of most states. Understanding it is critical to understanding how life sentences work here. The degrees of murder are defined in 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502; the penalties for each degree are set separately in 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
First-Degree Murder (18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(a)): An intentional killing: one committed by means of poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing. Under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(a), the penalty is death or life imprisonment, and a life term carries no parole eligibility. For an adult offender, there is no other option.
Second-Degree Murder (18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(b)): This is Pennsylvania's felony murder statute. A killing committed during the perpetration of an enumerated felony, including robbery, burglary, kidnapping, rape, arson, and others, constitutes second-degree murder. Under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(b), the penalty is mandatory life imprisonment, which carries no parole eligibility.
This is where Pennsylvania diverges sharply from most states. In the majority of U.S. jurisdictions, felony murder is classified as first-degree murder. In Pennsylvania, it is second-degree. But the practical effect is the same or worse: mandatory LWOP with no possibility of parole.
Third-Degree Murder (18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(c)): All other kinds of murder that do not qualify as first- or second-degree. This is a catch-all for killings committed with malice but without the specific intent required for first-degree or the felony circumstances of second-degree. Under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(d), the penalty is a term fixed by the court at not more than 40 years in prison. Only Pennsylvania, Florida, and Minnesota recognize third-degree murder as a separate category.
Voluntary Manslaughter (18 Pa.C.S. § 2503): A killing committed in the heat of passion upon adequate provocation. This is a first-degree felony carrying up to 20 years. Our guide to Pennsylvania manslaughter laws covers voluntary and involuntary manslaughter and homicide by vehicle in more depth.
The Absolute LWOP Rule
Pennsylvania's treatment of life sentences is unambiguous. The state's parole statute, 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1), authorizes the Parole Board to release offenders on parole "except an offender condemned to death or serving life imprisonment." A sentence of life imprisonment therefore means confinement for the remainder of the inmate's natural life.

There is no parole eligibility for any inmate serving life imprisonment in Pennsylvania. This applies equally to first-degree and second-degree murder convictions. The one statutory exception is for offenders who were under 18 at the time of a first-degree murder: under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1(a), the court may impose either life without parole or a term with a minimum of at least 35 years to life (at least 25 years to life if the offender was under 15), and a term-to-life sentence carries parole eligibility after the minimum.
The only avenues for release are:
-
Executive clemency: The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons must unanimously recommend commutation to the governor, who then decides whether to grant it. This is extraordinarily rare. Only a handful of life-sentenced inmates have received commutation in the past several decades.
-
Successful appeal: If a conviction is overturned on appeal, the inmate may be retried or released depending on the circumstances.
-
Legislative change: If Pennsylvania passes a law creating parole eligibility for lifers, currently incarcerated individuals could potentially benefit.
Pennsylvania Board of Pardons
The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons consists of five members: the Lieutenant Governor (who chairs the board), the Attorney General, and three members appointed by the governor. The board's authority and composition are established under Article IV, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. For a life-sentenced inmate seeking commutation, the board must vote unanimously to recommend commutation to the governor.
This unanimity requirement is a significant barrier. Even when four of five members support commutation, a single dissent blocks the recommendation. Reform advocates have called for changing the requirement to a simple majority.
Capital Punishment: Moratorium Since 2015
Pennsylvania retains the death penalty in statute, but it has been functionally dormant for over two decades.

Executive Moratorium
In February 2015, Governor Tom Wolf declared a moratorium on executions, stating that Pennsylvania's death penalty system was "error-prone, expensive, and does not make communities safer." Wolf signed a reprieve for every death warrant that came before him during his tenure.
Governor Josh Shapiro, who took office in January 2023, has continued the moratorium. Shapiro has stated that he will not sign any death warrants.
Death Row Population
As of early 2026, approximately 104 inmates remain on Pennsylvania's death row, one of the largest death row populations in the country. The Death Penalty Information Center's Pennsylvania page tracks current death row statistics and the history of the moratorium. Despite this large number, the state has not carried out an execution since 1999, when Gary Heidnik was executed by lethal injection. Like Oregon's last two executions, Heidnik was a "volunteer" who waived his appeals.
Pennsylvania has not carried out an involuntary execution since 1962.
Sentencing Statute
Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711, the penalty phase in a capital case involves the jury weighing aggravating and mitigating circumstances. If aggravating factors outweigh mitigating factors, the jury may impose a sentence of death. Otherwise, the verdict must be life imprisonment, which carries no parole eligibility under 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1).
Notable Life Sentence and Capital Cases
Mumia Abu-Jamal
Mumia Abu-Jamal is perhaps the most famous inmate in Pennsylvania's history. A former Black Panther and radio journalist, Abu-Jamal was convicted of the 1981 murder of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner and sentenced to death.
His case became an international cause. Supporters argued that racial bias, judicial misconduct, and unreliable witness testimony tainted the trial. In 2011, his death sentence was vacated on the grounds that the jury instructions were defective, and he was resentenced to life without parole. Abu-Jamal continues to appeal his conviction, and his case has gone through multiple rounds of litigation in state and federal courts.
Bill Cosby: Conviction and Reversal
While not a life sentence case, Bill Cosby's conviction and subsequent reversal by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2021 highlighted significant issues with the state's criminal justice system. The court overturned Cosby's aggravated indecent assault convictions on due process grounds, finding that a prior prosecutor's promise not to charge Cosby was binding.
The "Juvenile Lifer" Cases
Pennsylvania once had more juvenile lifers (individuals sentenced to mandatory LWOP as minors) than any other state, over 500 at its peak. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in Miller v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016), which made Miller's ban on mandatory juvenile life without parole retroactive, Pennsylvania resentenced hundreds of juvenile lifers.
The resentencing process has been extensive and contentious. Many former juvenile lifers have been resentenced to time served and released after decades in prison. Others have received new sentences that still amount to de facto life. The process continues as of 2026.
Recent Legislative Changes
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2023 | Governor Shapiro continues execution moratorium |
| 2015 | Governor Wolf declares moratorium on executions |
| 2012-present | Resentencing of juvenile lifers following Miller v. Alabama |
| 1999 | Last execution (Gary Heidnik, a volunteer) |

Pending Legislation: SB 135 (Parole for Lifers)
SB 135 is a pending bill that would create parole review eligibility for inmates serving life sentences in Pennsylvania. If enacted, it would fundamentally transform Pennsylvania from an absolute LWOP state to one with a pathway to release for lifers. The bill's current status can be tracked on the Pennsylvania General Assembly's legislative information website.
The bill proposes that life-sentenced inmates who have served a specified minimum number of years (typically 15 to 25, depending on the version of the bill) could petition for a parole hearing. The bill has significant support among criminal justice reform advocates and some legislators, but faces strong opposition from law enforcement organizations and victims' rights groups.
As of early 2026, SB 135 remains pending in the state legislature. Its passage would affect thousands of inmates currently serving LWOP.
Juvenile Life Sentences
Pennsylvania's history with juvenile life without parole is among the most significant in the country. Before the Miller v. Alabama and Montgomery decisions, Pennsylvania had sentenced more juveniles to mandatory LWOP than any other state, over 500 individuals.
Since those rulings, Pennsylvania courts have conducted hundreds of resentencing hearings. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court established guidelines for these hearings in Commonwealth v. Batts (2017), ruling that the standard for imposing JLWOP on resentencing is that the juvenile must be shown to be "permanently incorrigible."
For convictions after June 24, 2012, 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1(a) gives the court a choice when the offender was under 18 at the time of a first-degree murder: life imprisonment without parole, or a term of imprisonment with a minimum of at least 35 years to life (at least 25 years to life if the offender was under 15). A term-to-life sentence carries parole eligibility once the minimum is served.
Many former juvenile lifers have been released. Others remain incarcerated, either because they were resentenced to LWOP under the new discretionary standard or because their resentencing hearings have not yet occurred.
The ongoing resentencing process remains one of the largest such efforts in the country and has drawn national attention to the broader question of how states treat young offenders.
Historical Context
Pennsylvania's history with life sentences and capital punishment reflects a complex and often contradictory trajectory.
Colonial era: Pennsylvania was the first state to abolish the death penalty for all crimes other than first-degree murder (1794), reflecting its Quaker heritage and emphasis on prison reform. The Eastern State Penitentiary, opened in 1829, pioneered the concept of rehabilitation through solitary confinement.
The LWOP tradition: Pennsylvania's mandatory LWOP for life sentences has been in place for decades. Unlike most states, which at various points allowed parole for lifers, Pennsylvania has maintained an absolute prohibition. This has resulted in one of the largest life-sentenced populations in the nation.
Felony murder and LWOP: The combination of Pennsylvania's broad felony murder statute (second-degree murder) and its mandatory LWOP rule has been widely criticized. Individuals who participated in a felony during which someone was killed, even if they did not commit or intend the killing, receive the same sentence as premeditated murderers: life without parole.
Reform momentum: In recent years, a growing coalition of criminal justice reform organizations, faith communities, and even some prosecutors have called for changes to Pennsylvania's LWOP policy. The argument centers on the idea that mandatory LWOP for all lifers, including those convicted of felony murder, is disproportionate and does not serve the interests of justice.
Pennsylvania Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Life with parole | Does NOT exist for adults; anyone serving life imprisonment is barred from parole (61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1)) |
| LWOP available | Mandatory for adults convicted of second-degree murder, or of first-degree murder when death is not imposed (18 Pa.C.S. § 1102) |
| Death penalty | On the books, executive moratorium since 2015 |
| Execution method | Lethal injection |
| Current death row population | ~104 |
| Last execution | 1999 (Gary Heidnik, volunteer) |
| Third-degree murder | Yes (up to 40 years under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(d)); only PA, FL, and MN |
| JLWOP | Previously highest in nation; under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1 courts may now choose LWOP or at least 35 years to life (25 if under 15); resentencing ongoing |
| Parole board | Board of Pardons (unanimity required for commutation) |
Related Pages
- How Long Is a Life Sentence? State-by-State Guide
- Murder Sentencing Guidelines for Every State
- What Is Capital Murder?
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Pennsylvania?
For an adult offender, a life sentence in Pennsylvania means life without the possibility of parole: 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1) bars the Parole Board from paroling anyone serving life imprisonment. Pennsylvania is one of only six states where adult life sentences are LWOP. There are no parole hearings and no minimum term to serve. The exception is a person who was under 18 at the time of a first-degree murder, who may instead receive a term of at least 35 years to life (25 years to life if under 15) under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1 and becomes parole eligible after the minimum. For those serving life, the only paths to release are executive clemency (which requires a unanimous Board of Pardons recommendation) or a successful appeal.
Why is felony murder second-degree in Pennsylvania?
Pennsylvania classifies felony murder, a killing during the commission of an enumerated felony, as second-degree murder rather than first-degree. This is unusual; most states classify felony murder as first-degree. However, the practical effect is the same or worse: second-degree murder in Pennsylvania carries mandatory life without parole.
Does Pennsylvania have the death penalty?
Technically yes, but an executive moratorium on executions has been in place since 2015. Governor Wolf imposed it and Governor Shapiro has continued it. The last execution was in 1999. Approximately 104 inmates remain on death row.
What is SB 135 in Pennsylvania?
SB 135 is pending legislation that would create parole review eligibility for inmates serving life sentences. If passed, it would transform Pennsylvania from an absolute LWOP state to one with a pathway to release for lifers after serving a specified minimum number of years. It remains pending as of early 2026.
What happened with juvenile lifers in Pennsylvania?
Pennsylvania once had more juvenile lifers than any other state, over 500. Following the Supreme Court's Miller v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016) decisions, the state has conducted hundreds of resentencing hearings. Many former juvenile lifers have been released, while others remain incarcerated. The process continues as of 2026.
Updates
Corrected the description of Miller v. Alabama and Montgomery v. Louisiana: Montgomery made Miller's ban on mandatory juvenile life without parole retroactive but said a state may remedy a Miller violation by permitting parole consideration rather than by resentencing.
Punctuation restored where an automated edit had produced comma splices.
Corrected the statutes cited for Pennsylvania murder penalties and the no-parole rule (18 Pa.C.S. § 1102 and 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137), and added the juvenile term-to-life exception under 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses)
§ 1102Sentence for murder, murder of unborn child and murder of law enforcement officerIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) First degree.-- (1) Except as provided under section 1102.1 (relating to sentence of persons under the age of 18 for murder, murder of an unborn child and murder of a law enforcement officer), a person who has been convicted of a murder of the first degree or of murder of a law enforcement officer of the first degree shall be sentenced to death or to a term of life imprisonment in accordance with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711 (relating to sentencing procedure for murder of the first degree). (2) The sentence for a person who has been convicted of first degree murder of an unborn child shall be the same as the sentence for murder of the first degree, except that the death penalty shall not be imposed. This paragraph shall not affect the determination of an aggravating circumstance under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d)(17) for the killing of a pregnant woman. (b) Second degree.--Except as provided under section 1102.1, a person who has been convicted of murder of the second degree, of second degree murder of an unborn child or of second degree murder of a law enforcement officer shall be sentenced to a term of life imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 373 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Taylor (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2013, 2013 Pa. Super. 89)“…victed of only the general crime of attempted murder. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(c). Citing 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(c), Appell…”
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt. (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2017, 163 A.3d 410)“…lity of parole for his first-degree murder conviction, see 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(a) (amended effective Dec. 16, 2008 an…”
- Commonwealth v. Batts (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2013, 620 Pa. 115)“…ry term of life imprisonment for first-degree murder, see 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102(a)(1) (superseded, relative to juvenile…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Many Years for First Degree Murder?, How Many Years for Second Degree Murder? Sentences by State (2026), Pennsylvania Felony and Misdemeanor Degrees: Sentences and Fines
§ 2502MurderIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) Murder of the first degree.--A criminal homicide constitutes murder of the first degree when it is committed by an intentional killing. (b) Murder of the second degree.--A criminal homicide constitutes murder of the second degree when it is committed while defendant was engaged as a principal or an accomplice in the perpetration of a felony. (c) Murder of the third degree.--All other kinds of murder shall be murder of the third degree. Murder of the third degree is a felony of the first degree. (d) Definitions.--As used in this section the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection: "Fireman." Includes any employee or member of a municipal fire department or volunteer fire company. "Hijacking." Any unlawful or unauthorized seizure or exercise of control, by force or violence or threat of force or violence. "Intentional killing." Killing by means of poison, or by lying in wait, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate and premeditated killing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 2,080 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Bomar (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2003, 573 Pa. 426)“…ion or deliberation." Spotz, 759 A.2d at 1283 (citing 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(d) and Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 52…”
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S. (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2017, 638 Pa. 687)“…ultimately affirmed the PCRA court’s dismissal on 1 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(a). 2 18 Pa.C.S. § 903.…”
- Commonwealth v. Chmiel (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2005, 585 Pa. 547)“…and (3) the accused acted with a specific intent to kill. 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(a); Commonwealth v. Spotz, 563 Pa.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: First, Second, and Third Degree Murder: Key Differences, Murder Laws in the United States
§ 1102.1Sentence of persons under the age of 18 for murder, murder of an unborn child and murder of a law enforcement officerIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) First degree murder.--A person who has been convicted after June 24, 2012, of a murder of the first degree, first degree murder of an unborn child or murder of a law enforcement officer of the first degree and who was under the age of 18 at the time of the commission of the offense shall be sentenced as follows: (1) A person who at the time of the commission of the offense was 15 years of age or older shall be sentenced to a term of life imprisonment without parole, or a term of imprisonment, the minimum of which shall be at least 35 years to life. (2) A person who at the time of the commission of the offense was under 15 years of age shall be sentenced to a term of life imprisonment without parole, or a term of imprisonment, the minimum of which shall be at least 25 years to life. (b) Notice.--Reasonable notice to the defendant of the Commonwealth's intention to seek a sentence of life imprisonment without parole under subsection (a) shall be provided after conviction and before sentencing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 115 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt. (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2017, 163 A.3d 410)“…first- and second-degree murder after June 24, 2012.4 See 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1(a), (c). As it relates to first- degre…”
- Commonwealth v. Cunningham (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2013, 622 Pa. 543)“…ew cases involving sentencing for juvenile murderers, see 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1. The General Assembly made a policy jud…”
- Commonwealth v. Batts (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2013, 620 Pa. 115)“…1102(a)(1) (superseded, relative to juvenile offenders, by 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1), which rendered Appellant ineligible f…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2503Voluntary manslaughterIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) General rule.--A person who kills an individual without lawful justification commits voluntary manslaughter if at the time of the killing he is acting under a sudden and intense passion resulting from serious provocation by: (1) the individual killed; or (2) another whom the actor endeavors to kill, but he negligently or accidentally causes the death of the individual killed. (b) Unreasonable belief killing justifiable.--A person who intentionally or knowingly kills an individual commits voluntary manslaughter if at the time of the killing he believes the circumstances to be such that, if they existed, would justify the killing under Chapter 5 of this title (relating to general principles of justification), but his belief is unreasonable. (c) Grading.--Voluntary manslaughter is a felony of the first degree.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 263 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Spotz (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2014, 624 Pa. 4)“…and intense passion resulting from a serious provocation,” 18 Pa.C.S. § 2503(a)(1), 20 and would have rejected Appe…”
- Commonwealth v. Busanet (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2012, 618 Pa. 1)“…voluntary manslaughter, and not first degree murder. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 2503(a)(1) (providing that a “person who kil…”
- Commonwealth v. Martin (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2010, 607 Pa. 165)“…ould excite intense passion in a "reasonable person." See 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 2503 & Official Comment, 2301. See generall…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Pennsylvania Manslaughter Laws: Voluntary, Involuntary and DUI Deaths
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure)
§ 9711Sentencing procedure for murder of the first degreeIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Procedure in jury trials.-- (1) After a verdict of murder of the first degree is recorded and before the jury is discharged, the court shall conduct a separate sentencing hearing in which the jury shall determine whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. (2) In the sentencing hearing, evidence concerning the victim and the impact that the death of the victim has had on the family of the victim is admissible. Additionally, evidence may be presented as to any other matter that the court deems relevant and admissible on the question of the sentence to be imposed. Evidence shall include matters relating to any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances specified in subsections (d) and (e), and information concerning the victim and the impact that the death of the victim has had on the family of the victim. Evidence of aggravating circumstances shall be limited to those circumstances specified in subsection (d). (3) After the presentation of evidence, the court shall permit counsel to present argument for or against the sentence of death. The court shall then instruct the jury in accordance with subsection (c).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 919 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Fears (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2014, 624 Pa. 446)“…s committed in perpetration of a felony, specifically IDSI. 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d)(6). The court also determined appell…”
- Commonwealth v. Spotz (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2011, 610 Pa. 17)“…ommitted the killing while in the perpetration of a felony, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d)(6); had a significant history of vio…”
- Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 1982, 500 Pa. 16)“…ould permit the imposition of the death penalty pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d). Moreover, appel *78 lant has not ha…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Title 61 (Prisons and Parole)
§ 6137Parole powerIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) General criteria for parole.-- (1) The board may parole subject to consideration of guidelines established under 42 Pa.C.S. § 2154.5 (relating to adoption of guidelines for parole) or subject to section 6137.1 (relating to short sentence parole) and such information developed by or furnished to the board under section 6174 (relating to right of access to offenders), or both, and may release on parole any offender to whom the power to parole is granted to the board by this chapter, except an offender condemned to death or serving life imprisonment, whenever in its opinion: (i) The best interests of the offender justify or require that the offender be paroled. (ii) It does not appear that the interests of the Commonwealth will be injured by the offender's parole. (2) Parole shall be subject in every instance to the Commonwealth's right to immediately retake and hold in custody without further proceedings any offender charged after his parole with an additional offense until a determination can be made whether to continue his parole status.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 98 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt. (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2017, 163 A.3d 410)“…le of any person sentenced to life imprisonment. 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1). We therefore held that ju…”
- Commonwealth v. Batts (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2013, 620 Pa. 115)“…2.1), which rendered Appellant ineligible for parole, see 61 Pa. C.S. § 6137(a)(1), as well as six to twenty years f…”
- Hudson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2019, 204 A.3d 392)“…nt parole to an inmate who is serving a life sentence. See 61 Pa.C.S. §6137(a)(1). In an unpublished disposition, t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Sentencing Project's report on life and long-term imprisonment(sentencingproject.org)
- 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(a)(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- Pennsylvania Board of Pardons(bop.pa.gov).gov
- Article IV, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 71 Pa.C.S. § 295(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- Death Penalty Information Center's Pennsylvania page(deathpenaltyinfo.org)
- *Miller v. Alabama*(law.cornell.edu).gov
- Pennsylvania General Assembly's legislative information website(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102 (sentence for murder)(palegis.us)
- 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137 (parole power)(palegis.us)
- 18 Pa.C.S. § 1102.1 (sentence of persons under age 18 for murder)(palegis.us)
- 18 Pa.C.S. § 2503 (voluntary manslaughter)(palegis.us)