EnglishEspañol
Tennessee flag

Tennessee

Tennessee Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Tennessee Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits

Updates

Corrected a source description that still listed a 2027 expiration for Tennessee's body-camera confidentiality rule, which a 2026 law removed.

We corrected how the page describes Nashville's position on the 25-foot buffer law (the police chief has said he will not enforce it during the litigation) and separated Riley's holding from general advice about unlocking a phone or deleting a recording.

We corrected the police page, which said Tennessee residents have a settled First Amendment right to record police (the Sixth Circuit has not recognized it, so it is not clearly established here), narrowed the Riley v. California description, removed unsourced statewide body-camera mandates, and updated the 25-foot buffer-law appeal (argued October 21, 2026, no decision found).

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Added Tennessee's 25-foot buffer law (Tenn. Code Ann. 39-16-612, in effect since July 1, 2025) and the status of the pending federal challenge, set for Sixth Circuit argument on October 21, 2026.

Corrected the protests section to reflect Tennessee's 25-foot police buffer law and clarified that Tenn. Code Ann. 10-7-504(u) makes only certain body camera video confidential, not all footage.

Corrected the description of Crawford v. Geiger (6th Cir. 2016), which did not decide whether the First Amendment protects recording police.

Corrected a Fourth Amendment framing error in the KeyTakeaways and FAQ: police generally do not need a warrant to seize a phone (for example, incident to an arrest), only to search its contents, per Riley v. California, matching the more precise rule already stated in the article body.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the Tenn. Code Ann. 39-16-602 description and penalty table: the statute defines ONE offense (force against a law enforcement officer to resist a stop/frisk/halt/arrest/search) classified by whether a deadly weapon was used (Class B by default, Class A only with a deadly weapon) -- not two separately named/classified offenses ('obstruction of justice' vs. 'resisting arrest'), and the prevent-or-obstruct paraphrase had dropped the statute's force element and its scope limitation to law enforcement stops/frisks/halts/arrests/searches.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Tenn. Code Ann. section 39-13-601 - Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance(law.justia.com)
  2. Tenn. Code Ann. section 39-16-602 - Obstruction of Justice(law.justia.com)
  3. Tennessee Public Records Act FAQs, Office of Open Records Counsel(comptroller.tn.gov).gov
  4. Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel(comptroller.tn.gov).gov
  5. 42 U.S.C. section 1983 - Civil Rights Remedies(law.cornell.edu)
  6. U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division(justice.gov).gov
  7. T.C.A. section 10-7-504(u) - Public Records Exemption for Body Camera Footage(law.justia.com)
  8. Federal Wiretap Act - 18 U.S.C. section 2511(law.cornell.edu)
  9. Tennessee Public Chapter 409 (2025), Section 5 (Tenn. Code Ann. 39-16-612)(publications.tnsosfiles.com)
  10. Tennessee Public Chapter No. 916 (2022): body camera video confidentiality under Tenn. Code Ann. 10-7-504(u); its July 1, 2027 sunset, (u)(5), was deleted by Public Chapter 672 of 2026(publications.tnsosfiles.com).gov
  11. Tennessee Office of Open Records Counsel, Open Records Legislative Update, Summer 2022(comptroller.tn.gov).gov
  12. Courthouse News Service, Media outlets push back on Tennessee police buffer zone at 6th Circuit (Oct. 21, 2026)(courthousenews.com)
Share: