Colorado
Colorado Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Colorado permits recording in public places under the First Amendment. No state law requires consent or notification to film or photograph in public spaces. For audio, Colorado's one-party consent laws (C.R.S. 18-9-303 for phone and electronic communications and C.R.S. 18-9-304 for in-person conversations) allow you to record a conversation you take part in, wherever it happens.
Quick Answer
You can record in public places in Colorado. There is no state law prohibiting photography, video recording, or audio recording in public spaces where people have no reasonable expectation of privacy. Colorado's one-party consent framework under C.R.S. 18-9-303 and C.R.S. 18-9-304 further protects your right to record conversations you participate in, and C.R.S. 16-3-311 specifically protects recording police.
Your Right to Record in Public Spaces

The Legal Foundation
Colorado law does not require consent or notification to record in public spaces. The legal basis rests on the principle that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public. When you walk down a public street, sit in a park, or attend a public event, your visible activities and audible statements are not protected from observation or recording.

This principle applies to:
- Video recording: Filming people, buildings, vehicles, and activities visible from public spaces
- Photography: Taking photographs of anything visible from a public vantage point
- Audio recording: Capturing sounds and conversations audible to the general public
- Live streaming: Broadcasting real-time video and audio from public locations
First Amendment Protections
Recording in public is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In Irizarry v. Yehia, 38 F.4th 1282 (10th Cir. Jul. 11, 2022), the Tenth Circuit clearly established that recording police performing their public duties is a constitutionally protected First Amendment right as of May 26, 2019. Earlier, Frasier v. Evans, 992 F.3d 1003 (10th Cir. 2021), had held that the right was not clearly established as of August 2014. Together, these decisions mean that for incidents from May 2019 on, officers in the Tenth Circuit (which includes Colorado) cannot argue that the right to film police performing their duties in public was not clearly established, though a qualified immunity defense can still turn on the other elements of the claim. The Tenth Circuit grounded that right in core First Amendment principles, reasoning that filming the police and other public officials as they perform their official duties furthers debate on matters of public concern, and that filming the police is a form of news gathering. This protection extends to:
- Recording police officers performing their duties
- Filming public officials conducting government business
- Documenting protests, demonstrations, and rallies
- Journalism and news gathering activities
- Citizen journalism and social media reporting
Where You Can Record
Public spaces where recording is freely permitted in Colorado include:
- Public streets, sidewalks, and crosswalks
- City and state parks
- Public plazas and town squares
- Public transportation stations, bus stops, and platforms
- Government building exteriors and publicly accessible interiors
- Public beaches and recreation areas
- Fairgrounds during public events
- University and college campuses (in outdoor public areas)
Recording Government Meetings

Colorado Open Meetings Law
Colorado's Open Meetings Law, also known as the Sunshine Law (C.R.S. 24-6-402), requires that meetings of state and local public bodies be open to the public. The Colorado Division of Local Government provides guidance on open meetings requirements.
The law opens meetings such as these to the public, although it does not itself address whether attendees may record them:
- City council meetings
- County commissioner meetings
- School board meetings
- Public hearings and zoning meetings
- State legislative committee hearings
- Special district board meetings
- Any meeting of a body that exercises governmental authority
Recording Rules for Government Meetings
The Open Meetings Law guarantees public access, but it does not mention recording by attendees, and it does not itself grant a right to record or limit what a chair may do about recording. In practice, each public body sets its own rules. Common rules include:
- Requiring cameras to be set up before the meeting begins
- Designating a specific area for recording equipment
- Prohibiting flash photography that disrupts proceedings
- Requiring silent operation of recording devices
Some bodies go further and require advance notice or limit recording. Whether a particular restriction is lawful can turn on the First Amendment and the facts, so check the body's posted rules or ask the chair before you record.
Executive Sessions
Colorado's Open Meetings Law allows public bodies to enter executive (closed) sessions for specific purposes outlined in C.R.S. 24-6-402(4). These include discussions of personnel matters, attorney-client privileged communications, real estate negotiations, and security arrangements. You cannot record executive sessions.
Recording on Private Property Open to the Public

The Private Property Distinction
Businesses, shopping malls, restaurants, and other private properties open to the public are not "public spaces" in the legal sense. The property owner retains the right to set rules about recording on their premises.
This means:
- A store can prohibit photography or video recording inside its premises
- A restaurant can ask you to stop recording
- A shopping mall can establish and enforce no-recording policies
- A concert venue can ban recording during performances
If you refuse to comply with a private property owner's recording restrictions, you can be asked to leave. Refusing to leave after being asked constitutes criminal trespass under C.R.S. 18-4-504.
Businesses That Record Customers
Many businesses in Colorado record customers through security cameras. This is legal in publicly accessible areas of the business. However, businesses cannot place cameras in areas where customers have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as:
- Restrooms
- Fitting rooms and dressing rooms
- Private consultation rooms
For security camera specifics, see our Colorado Security Camera Laws page.
Audio Recording in Public
One-Party Consent in Public Settings
Colorado's one-party consent law applies to audio recording regardless of the setting. In public, this means:
- You can record conversations you participate in, even on a busy street
- You can record conversations that are audible to the general public (no reasonable expectation of privacy)
- You cannot use electronic amplification devices to capture private conversations occurring at a distance
The Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Standard
Whether someone has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a public space depends on the circumstances:
No expectation of privacy (recording is legal):
- Two people talking at normal volume on a park bench
- A speaker addressing a crowd at a rally
- A customer complaining loudly at a store counter
- A person shouting into a phone on a sidewalk
Possible expectation of privacy (recording may be problematic):
- Two people whispering in a secluded corner of a public park
- A private conversation in a restaurant booth with reasonable measures to keep it private
- A conversation in a public restroom
The key factor is whether the speakers took reasonable steps to maintain privacy and whether an ordinary person in that situation would expect their conversation to remain private.
Recording at Protests and Public Demonstrations
Your Rights at Protests
Colorado has a long history of public protests and demonstrations. Your right to record at these events is protected by both the First Amendment and Colorado statute:
- You can record police actions during protests from any lawful vantage point
- You can record other protesters, counter-protesters, and bystanders in public
- You can live stream protest activities to social media
- Journalists and citizen journalists have the same recording rights as other members of the public
If Police Order Dispersal
If police declare an unlawful assembly and order the crowd to disperse:
- You must comply with the dispersal order
- You can continue recording as you leave the area
- Police cannot order you to stop recording as a condition of leaving
- If you are arrested, C.R.S. 16-3-311 does not protect your device, because the statute expressly does not apply to devices seized incident to arrest. Police generally still need a warrant to search the phone's contents
For more on recording police, see our Colorado Laws on Recording Police page.
Recording in Specific Public Settings
Public Transportation
Colorado's Regional Transportation District (RTD) operates buses and light rail in the Denver metro area. RTD vehicles are equipped with security cameras and audio recording equipment. Passengers can also record on public transit:
- You can record fellow passengers and interactions with transit workers
- One-party consent applies to conversations you participate in
- Recording other passengers' private conversations without participating may raise eavesdropping concerns under C.R.S. 18-9-304
Courthouses
Recording inside Colorado courthouses is subject to specific rules. The Colorado Judicial Branch establishes policies for recording in courtrooms:
- Each judicial district may set its own rules about cameras and recording in courtrooms
- Generally, recording requires advance permission from the presiding judge
- Recording in courthouse hallways and public areas may be permitted but is often restricted
- Audio recording of your own conversations in public courthouse areas follows one-party consent rules
Libraries, Museums, and Public Facilities
Publicly funded facilities like libraries and museums are generally considered public spaces, but they may establish reasonable recording policies:
- Libraries may restrict recording to protect patron privacy
- Museums may prohibit photography of certain exhibits due to copyright or preservation concerns
- Community centers and recreation facilities may restrict recording in certain areas
These restrictions are property-based rules, not criminal laws. Violating them may result in being asked to leave, not criminal charges.
Drones and Aerial Recording
Drones add a vertical dimension to public recording. Colorado does not have a comprehensive state drone law, but several rules apply:
- FAA regulations govern drone operation in national airspace
- Local ordinances in many Colorado cities regulate drone use
- Recording from a drone in public airspace is generally legal, similar to recording from any public vantage point
- Using a drone to record into private spaces (through windows, over privacy fences into backyards) may violate privacy laws including C.R.S. 18-7-801
- Using a drone to obstruct or interfere with police, firefighters, emergency medical personnel, or rescue specialists responding to an emergency or accident is a class 2 misdemeanor under C.R.S. 18-8-104(2.5), Colorado's obstruction statute, which treats an unmanned aircraft system used as an obstacle the same as physical interference unless the operator coordinates with the agency managing the response
Limits on Public Recording
Harassment
Recording someone in public can cross the line into harassment under C.R.S. 18-9-111 if the recording is done in a manner intended to harass, annoy, or alarm. Following someone while recording them, recording someone repeatedly after being asked to stop, or using recording as a tool of intimidation could constitute harassment.
Stalking
Using recording as part of a pattern of behavior intended to cause a reasonable person to feel frightened, threatened, or intimidated may constitute stalking under C.R.S. 18-3-602. Stalking through repeated surveillance or recording is a serious criminal offense.
Interference with Emergency Operations
Recording at emergency scenes is legal, but physically interfering with emergency operations is not. Keep a safe distance from fire scenes, accident scenes, and medical emergencies. First responders can establish perimeters for safety, and you must stay outside those perimeters.
School Grounds
Recording on public school grounds may be restricted during school hours for student safety reasons. See our Colorado School Recording Laws page for details.
More Colorado Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Colorado Recording Laws
More Colorado Recording Topics
More Colorado Laws
- Colorado AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Colorado Dashcam Laws
- Colorado Data Privacy Laws
- Colorado Deepfake Laws
- Colorado Employee Monitoring Laws
- Colorado GPS Tracking Laws
- Colorado Police Bodycam Laws
- Colorado Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record people in public in Colorado?
Yes. Colorado has no prohibition on recording in public spaces. People in public have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their visible activities. You can film, photograph, and record audio of anything visible or audible from a public vantage point.
Can I record a government meeting in Colorado?
Often, yes, but check the body's rules first. Colorado's Open Meetings Law (C.R.S. 24-6-402) requires most government meetings to be open to the public, but it does not address whether attendees may record them. Each body sets its own recording rules, so check its posted rules or ask the chair before you record.
Can a store tell me to stop recording in Colorado?
Yes. Stores and businesses are private property, even when open to the public. The property owner can set recording policies and ask you to stop recording. If you refuse, you can be asked to leave, and remaining after being asked constitutes trespassing.
Is it legal to live stream in public in Colorado?
Yes. Live streaming from public spaces is protected under the same principles as other forms of public recording. You can stream from streets, parks, protests, and other public areas without permission or notification.
Can recording someone in public be considered harassment in Colorado?
In rare cases, yes. If recording is done as part of a pattern intended to harass, annoy, or alarm someone, it could constitute harassment under C.R.S. 18-9-111. Following someone while recording, recording them repeatedly after being asked to stop, or using recording as intimidation could cross this line.
Updates
We corrected the page to say that C.R.S. 16-3-311 does not protect a recording device seized when you are arrested, that the Open Meetings Law opens meetings but does not itself guarantee a right to record them, and that Frasier v. Evans concerned conduct in August 2014; we also named the in-person eavesdropping statute (18-9-304) alongside 18-9-303.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of Irizarry v. Yehia and Frasier v. Evans to what the Tenth Circuit actually held about filming police and qualified immunity.
Replaced a fabricated drone-near-emergency statute citation (C.R.S. 18-9-118 is actually a firearms-in-transit-facility law, unrelated to drones) with Colorado's real drone-interference-with-emergency-responders provision, C.R.S. 18-8-104(2.5), and replaced a dead case-law citation link.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 18: Criminal Code
§ 18-9-304Eavesdropping prohibited - penaltyIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
(1) Any person not visibly present during a conversation or discussion commits eavesdropping if he: (a) Knowingly overhears or records such conversation or discussion without the consent of at least one of the principal parties thereto, or attempts to do so; or (b) Intentionally overhears or records such conversation or discussion for the purpose of committing, aiding, or abetting the commission of an unlawful act; or (c) Knowingly uses for any purpose, discloses, or attempts to use or disclose to any other person the contents of any such conversation or discussion while knowing or having reason to know the information was obtained in violation of this section; or (d) Knowingly aids, authorizes, agrees with, employs, permits, or intentionally conspires with any person to violate the provisions of this section. (2) Eavesdropping is a class 2 misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Colorado Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Colorado Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
§ 18-3-602Stalking - penalty - definitions - Vonnie's lawIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) A person commits stalking if directly, or indirectly through another person, the person knowingly: (a) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with the threat, repeatedly follows, approaches, contacts, or places under surveillance that person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship; or (b) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with the threat, repeatedly makes any form of communication with that person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship, regardless of whether a conversation ensues; or (c) Repeatedly follows, approaches, contacts, places under surveillance, or makes any form of communication with another person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to suffer serious emotional distress and does cause that person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship to suffer…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Twitty (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2023)“…e was indicted for violating Colorado’s stalking statute, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-602(1)(b), as assimilated by the…”
- Williams IV v. Carbajol (District Court, D. Colorado 2021)“…rado law also provides a tort-law remedy for stalking. See Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-602 (“A person commit stalking if directly,…”
- Gabriel v. El Paso Combined Courts (District Court, D. Colorado 2019)“…tion for a Restraining Order” cites two legal pro- visions: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-602 (“Stalking”) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
§ 18-4-504Third degree criminal trespassIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) A person commits the crime of third degree criminal trespass if such person unlawfully enters or remains in or upon premises of another. (2) Third degree criminal trespass is a petty offense, but: (a) Repealed. (b) It is a class 5 felony if the person trespasses on premises classified as agricultural land with the intent to commit a felony thereon; except that it is a class 6 felony if the agricultural land did not have a fence securing the perimeter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Perry v. State of Colorado, The (District Court, D. Colorado 2023)“…5 In relevant part, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-504 provided at the time of the alleged und…”
- Gonzalez v. Brunnemer (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2025)“…enter[ing] or remain[ing] in or upon premises of another.” Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-504; see also Greeley Mun. Code § 14-288(b)…”
- Slatton v. Hopkins (District Court, D. Colorado 2020)“…awfully enters or remains in or upon premises of another.” C.R.S. § 18-4-504(1). Officer Hopkins argues that after…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Video Recording Laws: What Is Legal and What Is Not, Is Disorderly Conduct a Misdemeanor in Colorado? Penalties, Trespass
§ 18-7-801Criminal invasion of privacyIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
(1) A person who knowingly observes or takes a photograph of another person's intimate parts, as defined in section 18-3-401 (2), without that person's consent, in a situation where the person observed or photographed has a reasonable expectation of privacy, commits criminal invasion of privacy. (2) Criminal invasion of privacy is a class 2 misdemeanor. (3) For the purposes of this section, photograph includes a photograph, motion picture, videotape, live feed, print, negative, slide, or other mechanically, electronically, digitally, or chemically reproduced visual material.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Privacy, and Rights, Colorado Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Provider Rules, Colorado School Recording Laws: Classrooms, IEP Meetings, and Surveillance
§ 18-8-104Obstructing a peace officer, firefighter, emergency medical service provider, rescue specialist, or volunteerIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) (a) A person commits obstructing a peace officer, firefighter, emergency medical service provider, rescue specialist, or volunteer when, by using or threatening to use violence, force, physical interference, or an obstacle, such person knowingly obstructs, impairs, or hinders the enforcement of the penal law or the preservation of the peace by a peace officer, acting under color of his or her official authority; knowingly obstructs, impairs, or hinders the prevention, control, or abatement of fire by a firefighter, acting under color of his or her official authority; knowingly obstructs, impairs, or hinders the administration of medical treatment or emergency assistance by an emergency medical service provider or rescue specialist, acting under color of his or her official authority; or knowingly obstructs, impairs, or hinders the administration of emergency care or emergency assistance by a volunteer, acting in good faith to render such care or assistance without compensation at the place of an emergency or accident.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Holdridge v. Blank (District Court, D. Colorado 2017, 255 F. Supp. 3d 1088)“…er, acting under color of his or her official authority[.]” C.R.S. § 18-8-104(l)(a). By all indications, after plai…”
- Kaufman v. Higgs (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2012, 697 F.3d 1297)“…nder color of his or her official authority . . . . Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-8-104(1)(a). 3 The Defendants concede that Mr…”
- Navratil v. Parker (District Court, D. Colorado 1989, 726 F. Supp. 800)“…rians. Navratil was then charged with a violation of Colo.Rev.Stat. § 18-8-104, which provides: “a person commits obst…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Hunting & Shoot-Down Rules
§ 18-9-111Harassment - Kiana Arellano's LawIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, the person: (a) Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him to physical contact; or (b) In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person; or (c) Follows a person in or about a public place; or (d) Repealed. (e) Directly or indirectly initiates communication with a person or directs language toward another person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, telephone network, data network, text message, instant message, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium in a manner intended to harass or threaten bodily injury or property damage, or makes any comment, request, suggestion, or proposal by telephone, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium that is obscene; or (f) Makes a telephone call or causes a telephone to ring repeatedly, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate conversation; or (g) Makes repeated communications at inconvenient hours that invade the privacy of another and interfere in the use and…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Scott (Supreme Court of Colorado 2005, 121 P.3d 366)“…ite violations of C.R.S. § 18-3-204, C.R.S. § 18-3-303, and C.R.S. § 18-9-111 in support of their allegation. These c…”
- Thomas Pearson v. The People of the State of Colorado. (Supreme Court of Colorado 2022, 2022 CO 4)“…mative defense to the specific-intent crime of Harassment, C.R.S. § 18-9-111(1)(a), and failed to properly instruct…”
- People v. Clough (Supreme Court of Colorado 2003, 74 P.3d 552)“…n the courthouse lobby. These criminal acts in violation of CRS. § 18-9-111(1)(h) and 18-9-106(1)(c) reflect advers…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Assault Laws: First, Second and Third Degree Penalties
§ 18-9-303Wiretapping prohibited - penaltyIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
(1) Any person not a sender or intended receiver of a telephone or telegraph communication commits wiretapping if he: (a) Knowingly overhears, reads, takes, copies, or records a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication without the consent of either a sender or a receiver thereof or attempts to do so; or (b) Intentionally overhears, reads, takes, copies, or records a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication for the purpose of committing or aiding or abetting the commission of an unlawful act; or (c) Knowingly uses for any purpose or discloses to any person the contents of any such communication, or attempts to do so, while knowing or having reason to know the information was obtained in violation of this section; or (d) Knowingly taps or makes any connection with any telephone or telegraph line, wire, cable, or instrument belonging to another or with any electronic, mechanical, or other device belonging to another or installs any device whether connected or not which permits the interception of messages; or (e) Repealed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2001
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…5-60-120 (1997); Cal. Penal Code Ann. §631 (West 1999); Colo. Rev. Stat. §18-9-303 (2000); Del. Code Ann., Tit. 11, § 133…”
- Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1999, 191 F.3d 463)“…oncert with them); Cal.Penal Code §§ 631, 632 (West 1999); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303 (1986 & Supp.1995); Conn. Gen. Stat. §…”
- Sequa Corp. v. Lititech, Inc. (District Court, D. Colorado 1992, 807 F. Supp. 653)“…Menaman. Defendants rely on Colorado’s wiretapping statute, C.R.S. § 18-9-303, which provides in relevant part:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Security Camera Laws: Residential, Commercial, and Privacy Rules, Colorado Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 16: Criminal Proceedings
§ 16-3-311Peace officer incident recordingsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(1) A person has the right to lawfully record any incident involving a peace officer and to maintain custody and control of that recording and the device used to record the recording. A peace officer shall not seize a recording or recording device without consent, without a search warrant or subpoena, or without a lawful exception to the warrant requirement. (2) (a) If a peace officer seeks to obtain from a person a device used to record an incident involving a peace officer in order to access the recording as possible evidence in an investigation, the officer shall first: (I) Advise the person of his or her name, his or her badge number or other identifying number, and the name of the law enforcement agency; (II) Identify the legal reason for which the information is requested; and (III) If practicable under the circumstances, inquire whether the person will voluntarily provide the officer with a copy of the specific recording that is relevant to the investigation either by voluntarily providing the device to the officer or immediately electronically transferring the information to the officer or the law enforcement agency so that the person may retain possession of his or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Colorado Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent and Interstate Rules, Colorado Laws on Recording Police: Rights, Protections, and Body Cameras
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 24: Government - State
§ 24-6-402Meetings - open to public - legislative declaration - definitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) For the purposes of this section: (a) (I) Local public body means any board, committee, commission, authority, or other advisory, policy-making, rule-making, or formally constituted body of any political subdivision of the state and any public or private entity to which a political subdivision, or an official thereof, has delegated a governmental decision-making function but does not include persons on the administrative staff of the local public body. (II) Notwithstanding subsection (1)(a)(I) of this section, in order to assure school board transparency local public body shall include members of a board of education, school administration personnel, or a combination thereof who are involved in a meeting with a representative of employees at which a collective bargaining agreement is discussed. (III) Notwithstanding subsection (1)(a)(I) of this section, local public body includes the governing board of an institute charter school that is authorized pursuant to part 5 of article 30.5 of title 22.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Guy, T v. Whitsitt (Colorado Court of Appeals 2020, 469 P.3d 546)“…vice on specific legal questions in accordance with C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b); 3. Determining positions re…”
- Gumina v. City of Sterling (Colorado Court of Appeals 2004, 119 P.3d 527)“…in substantial discussion of any matters not enumerated in C.R.S. 24-6-402(4) or . adopted a proposed policy, posi…”
- Zbylski v. Douglas County School District (District Court, D. Colorado 2015, 154 F. Supp. 3d 1146)“…sion of the state” shall include “any.. .school district.” Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-6-402 (l)(c). See Branson School District RE…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 18: Criminal Code § 18-1.3-101 (Pretrial diversion - appropriation - repeal)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- C.R.S. 18-9-303 - Wiretapping Prohibited(law.justia.com)
- C.R.S. 24-6-402 - Open Meetings Law(law.justia.com)
- Colorado Division of Local Government - Open Meetings(dlg.colorado.gov).gov
- C.R.S. 16-3-311 - Peace Officer Recordings(law.justia.com)
- Colorado Judicial Branch(courts.state.co.us).gov
- Colorado Title 18 Criminal Code(content.leg.colorado.gov).gov
- Irizarry v. Yehia, 38 F.4th 1282 (10th Cir. 2022)(courtlistener.com)
- C.R.S. 18-9-304 - Eavesdropping Prohibited(law.justia.com)