EnglishEspañol
Mississippi flag

Mississippi

Mississippi Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Mississippi Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)

Updates

Corrected an FAQ answer to state the actual Rule 403 test for excluding a recording.

Corrected the evidence-exclusion standard to the 'substantially outweighs' test in Mississippi Rule of Evidence 403.

We corrected the description of Mississippi's wiretap felony (it covers misuse of court-authorized wiretaps, not a private person sharing a recording), how civil damages are calculated, the penalty ranges, the full crime, tort, or injurious-act limit on one-party recording, the Open Meetings Act, cross-state calls and suppression rules, and an inaccurate changelog line.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the description of Miss. Code Ann. 41-29-505: it is the judicial procedure for authorizing a narcotics wiretap order, not the general prohibition on interception (that comes from 41-29-533).

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Spoke propagation from parent hub: removed FindLaw Turner v. Driver citations (5th Cir. No. 16-10312) from the police, public-recording, and video spokes; corrected is_gov flags for legislature.ms.gov entries in SourcesList components; added keywords and citations arrays to [dashcam](/dashboard-camera-legality-and-privacy-laws-is-it-illegal-to-use-dashcams-in-north-america), landlord-tenant, and schools spokes; updated workplace spoke NLRB section to cite Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023) as the controlling work-rule standard replacing Boeing. No fabricated cases (Lewis v. State, Glazner v. Glazner) or SB 2437 references found. No 47 CFR 64.501 or FCC 23-107 references found.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Miss. Code Ann. section 41-29-531 - One-Party Consent Exception(law.justia.com)
  2. Miss. Code Ann. section 41-29-505 - Narcotics Wiretap Court-Order Procedure(law.justia.com)
  3. Miss. Code Ann. section 41-29-501 - Definitions(law.justia.com)
  4. Miss. Code Ann. section 41-29-533 - Penalties(law.justia.com)
  5. Miss. Code Ann. section 41-29-529 - Civil Action(law.justia.com)
  6. 18 U.S.C. section 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
  7. Mississippi Legislature Official Site(legislature.ms.gov).gov
  8. Mississippi Rules of Evidence(courts.ms.gov).gov
  9. RCFP Reporters Recording Guide - Mississippi(rcfp.org)
  10. 18 U.S.C. section 2701 - Stored Communications Act(law.cornell.edu)
Share: