Montana
Montana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Montana has no dedicated teen-sexting law, so prosecutors apply the Sexual Abuse of Children statute, MCA 45-5-625, to minors and adults alike. A minor who sends or receives a nude image faces the same felony framework as an adult offender, with no diversion statute or reduced misdemeanor available.
Montana treats teen sexting the same way it treats adult child pornography. The state has not passed a specific teen sexting law, a diversion statute, or a reduced misdemeanor for minors who share explicit images. Instead, prosecutors apply the general felony statute for Sexual Abuse of Children under MCA § 45-5-625. That means a teenager who sends or receives a nude selfie faces the same criminal framework as an adult offender.
This article explains every statute that applies to sexting in Montana, the penalties for adults and minors, the state's revenge porn law, sextortion charges, sex offender registration requirements, and what to do if you or your child faces an investigation.
Why Montana's Approach Is So Severe
Most states have created reduced penalties or diversion programs specifically for teen sexting. These laws recognize that a teenager exchanging photos with a peer is fundamentally different from an adult exploiting a child. Montana has not made that distinction.
In Montana, if a 17-year-old sends a nude photo to another 17-year-old, both can face felony charges:
- The sender can be charged with production or distribution of child pornography.
- The receiver can be charged with possession of child pornography.
Because there is no specific middle-ground law, prosecutors hold tremendous discretion. They can choose to file a life-altering felony, pursue lesser charges through youth court, or decline prosecution altogether. This inconsistency makes sexting in Montana legally dangerous and unpredictable.
Sexual Abuse of Children: MCA § 45-5-625
The primary statute used in sexting cases is MCA § 45-5-625, titled "Sexual Abuse of Children." Under this law, a person commits an offense if they knowingly:

- Employ, use, or permit the use of a child to engage in sexual conduct for the purpose of creating a visual depiction.
- Process, develop, print, publish, transport, distribute, sell, exhibit, or advertise any visual medium depicting a child engaged in sexual conduct.
- Possess any visual medium depicting a child engaged in sexual conduct.
- Finance any of the above activities.
What Counts as "Sexual Conduct"
The statute defines "sexual conduct" broadly, but each category carries a qualifier that does real work. Under MCA § 45-5-625(6)(d)(i), the term covers actual or simulated:
- Sexual intercourse, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex
- Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object, outside a recognized medical procedure
- Bestiality
- Masturbation
- Sadomasochistic abuse
- Lewd exhibition of the genitals, breasts, pubic or rectal area, or other intimate parts of any person
- Defecation or urination for the purpose of the sexual stimulation of the viewer
Note the wording of the exhibition category. It is gender neutral, it covers the genitals, breasts, pubic or rectal area, or other intimate parts of any person, and it is qualified by the word "lewd." The statute does not contain a separate category for bare exhibition of the female breast.
A second, independent branch at MCA § 45-5-625(6)(d)(ii) reaches depiction or observation of a child in the nude or in a state of partial undress, but only when coupled with a purpose to abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade the child, or to arouse or gratify a sexual response or desire.
A sexually explicit nude image falls squarely inside the first branch. A merely topless image is not automatically covered. It qualifies only if it amounts to a lewd exhibition under the first branch, or if it is accompanied by one of the purposes named in the second. That is an element a prosecutor has to prove, not an automatic result.
Penalties by Offense Type
Montana law creates different penalty tiers depending on the specific conduct. Understanding these tiers is critical for anyone facing charges.

Production and Distribution
If the victim is under 16 years old, the penalties are the harshest in the statute:
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Prison term | Not less than 4 years, not more than 100 years |
| Alternative | Life imprisonment |
| Fine | Up to $10,000 |
| Sex offender registration | Required on adult conviction (see the youth court exemption below) |
If the victim is 16 or 17, the general penalty applies: life imprisonment or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 100 years, with a fine up to $10,000. There is no mandatory minimum for the 16-17 age group under this subsection.
Possession
Simple possession of material depicting a minor engaged in sexual conduct carries a separate, lower penalty tier:
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Prison term | Up to 10 years |
| Fine | Up to $10,000 |
| Sex offender registration | Required on adult conviction (see the youth court exemption below) |
This distinction matters in sexting cases. A teen who receives and saves a nude photo faces the possession penalty, while a teen who takes and sends the photo faces the production and distribution penalty.
Enhanced Penalty for Young Victims
If the victim was 12 years old or younger and the offender was 18 or older at the time, Montana law requires a mandatory 100-year prison sentence (MCA § 45-5-625).
Exception for Offenders Under 18
There is one critical safety valve. Under MCA § 46-18-222, mandatory minimum sentences do not apply if the offender was under 18 at the time of the offense. This means a judge sentencing a minor is not locked into the 4-year minimum that applies to adults. The judge retains discretion to impose a shorter sentence or use juvenile court alternatives.
However, this exception only removes the mandatory minimum. It does not reduce the maximum penalty or eliminate the felony classification, and a minor sentenced in adult court can still receive a lengthy prison term at the judge's discretion.
Sex offender registration is governed by a different set of statutes, and for a case resolved in youth court the rule runs the opposite way. See the registration section below.
The Consent Trap: Age of Consent vs. Image Laws
This is the most dangerous misunderstanding for Montana teens and parents.

How the Age of Consent Misleads People
Montana's age of consent for physical sexual contact is 16. That rule comes from the definition of consent at MCA § 45-5-501(1)(b)(iv), which provides that a person less than 16 years old is incapable of consent, applied through the sexual intercourse without consent statute, MCA § 45-5-503. Age alone therefore does not make a person 16 or older incapable of consent under that definition.
This protection does not extend to photographs.
The Sexual Abuse of Children statute has no consent exception. Even where age does not make the sexual conduct itself an offense, a photo of that conduct involving a minor is treated differently:
- A minor who takes the photo has created child pornography.
- An adult who receives the photo possesses child pornography.
Consent is never a defense to possessing or distributing child pornography, even when the minor took the photo voluntarily and sent it willingly.
Revenge Porn: MCA § 45-8-213(1)(d)
Contrary to older reports, Montana does have a law addressing nonconsensual sharing of intimate images. In 2019, the legislature passed HB 192, which amended the Privacy in Communications statute (MCA § 45-8-213) to add subsection (1)(d).
Under this provision, as amended again in 2025 (Ch. 686, L. 2025), a person commits an offense if they publish or distribute real or digitally fabricated photographs, images, or films of an identifiable person without consent that show:
- Visible genitals, anus, or buttocks
- Exposed female breast (nipple visible)
- The person engaged in a real or simulated sexual act
The purpose element is disjunctive. The distribution must be done with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure the person depicted, or with the purpose to obtain money or other valuable consideration. The second alternative stands on its own, so a distributor motivated by extortion or profit is covered without any proof of an intent to harm. Because the statute now covers "digitally fabricated" images alongside real ones, it reaches AI-generated or digitally altered ("deepfake") images of a real, identifiable person, not just authentic photos or video.
Revenge Porn Penalties
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| First offense | Misdemeanor | Up to 6 months in jail, $500 fine |
| Second or subsequent offense | Felony | Up to 5 years in prison, $25,000 fine |
Exceptions to the Revenge Porn Law
The statute does not apply to:
- Images involving voluntary public exposure
- Disclosures made in the public interest, including reporting unlawful conduct
- Disclosures in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings, or medical treatment
- Disclosures involving historic, artistic, scientific, or educational materials
Limitations of the Law
Montana's statute requires proof of a specific purpose, which is narrower than the laws in states that criminalize nonconsensual distribution regardless of motive. That said, the purpose element is broader than it first appears, because it is written in the alternative. A prosecutor can satisfy it either with the purpose to "terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure" or with the purpose "to obtain money or other valuable consideration," which covers the extortion and profit cases.
The gap that remains is the distributor who shares intimate images to brag to friends, seeking neither to harm the person depicted nor to make money. Proving purpose in that scenario is genuinely difficult.
Sextortion and Coercion Charges
When sexting involves threats or blackmail, additional charges apply. Montana has two provisions that reach image-based sextortion directly, and they are the place to start.
Threatening to Release a Child's Image: MCA § 45-5-625(1)(j)
The Sexual Abuse of Children statute covers sextortion of a minor on its own terms. Under MCA § 45-5-625(1)(j), a person commits the offense by knowingly threatening to release, exhibit, or distribute any image or video of a child engaging in sexual conduct in order to compel the child to provide additional images or videos, to obtain any item of value, or to coerce the child to commit or facilitate any crime. It carries the felony penalties described earlier in this article.
Threatening to Disclose Intimate Images for Money: MCA § 45-8-213(1)(e)
Where the target is an adult, MCA § 45-8-213(1)(e) applies to a person who, with the purpose to obtain money or other valuable consideration from an identifiable person and without that person's consent, possesses and threatens to disclose real or digitally fabricated intimate images or videos. The penalty tiers match the revenge porn table above: a misdemeanor on a first offense, and a felony carrying up to 5 years and a $25,000 fine on a second or subsequent offense.
Intimidation: MCA § 45-5-203
MCA § 45-5-203 is a general felony that can apply, but only when a specific element is satisfied. Intimidation requires a communicated threat, made under circumstances that reasonably tend to produce fear and with the purpose to cause another person to perform or omit an act, to do one of three things: inflict physical harm on someone, subject a person to physical confinement or restraint, or commit any felony.
A demand along the lines of "send me a nude or I will share your photos" does not automatically meet that element. Threatening to share an adult's intimate image is a misdemeanor on a first offense under MCA § 45-8-213(4), so the threatened act is not itself a felony unless the offender has a prior conviction or the images depict a minor, in which case the threatened conduct is a felony under MCA § 45-5-625. Whether intimidation is chargeable turns on which of the three threatened acts is present, not on the coercion by itself.
Penalty: Up to 10 years in state prison and a fine up to $50,000.
Theft by Extortion
If money or something of value is demanded in exchange for not releasing intimate images, prosecutors can also pursue theft by extortion charges under Montana's theft statutes. Whatever the eventual charge, the person facing that demand should not pay it, and our guide to sextortion covers where to report the threats instead.
Federal Jurisdiction
Federal laws frequently apply to sextortion cases because internet communications almost always cross state lines. Federal child exploitation charges carry penalties of 15 to 30 years in prison under 18 U.S.C. § 2251.
In 2025, Congress also passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12), creating a specific federal criminal offense for publishing or threatening to publish a nonconsensual intimate image, including an AI-generated digital forgery. Threatening to publish an authentic image, the classic sextortion scenario, carries up to 2 years in federal prison for an adult victim or up to 3 years for a minor victim; a threat involving a digital forgery carries a separate, lower penalty of up to 18 months (adult) or 30 months (minor). A related federal civil law, 15 U.S.C. § 6851, lets a victim sue for at least $150,000 in liquidated damages plus attorney's fees.
Sex Offender Registration
Sexual abuse of children is listed as a registrable "sexual offense" at MCA § 46-23-502(10), so an adult convicted of it must register under the Sexual or Violent Offender Registration Act. The registration duty is not absolute, though. MCA § 46-23-504(1) opens with the words "Except as provided in 41-5-1513 and 45-5-503(5)."
The Youth Court Exemption
That first exception is the most important provision on this page for a teenager, because teen sexting cases usually go to youth court. Under MCA § 41-5-1513(1)(d), a delinquent youth who has been adjudicated for a sexual offense as defined in 46-23-502 "is exempt from the duty to register as a sexual offender" unless the court finds that:
- the youth has previously been found to have committed, or been adjudicated for, a sexual offense; or
- registration is necessary for protection of the public and is in the public's best interest.
In other words, for a youth court adjudication the statutory default is exemption, and registration is the exception a judge has to make findings to reach. The youth court must still order a psychosexual evaluation, designate a risk level, and require completion of sex offender treatment under MCA § 41-5-1513(2), and where registration is ordered the court may set a shorter duration than the adult term under MCA § 41-5-1513(6).
This exemption is tied to youth court. If the case is transferred to adult court, it no longer applies and a conviction carries the adult registration duty described below.
Registration Requirements
Registered offenders must:
- Provide their name, aliases, and current physical address
- Report the name and address of any employer or school
- Provide descriptions of all vehicles owned or operated
- Disclose internet activity information
- Submit to fingerprinting, photographing, and DNA collection
Consequences of Registration
Being on the sex offender registry carries lifelong consequences:
- Your name, photo, and address appear on a publicly searchable database maintained by the Montana Department of Justice.
- You face restrictions on where you can live, often barring residences near schools and parks.
- Employment opportunities narrow significantly, as many employers conduct registry checks.
- Social stigma persists long after the criminal sentence ends.
Montana's Juvenile Justice System
Minors charged with sexting offenses typically enter the juvenile justice system through Montana's Youth Courts. Under the Montana Youth Court Act, the focus is on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
Possible Juvenile Outcomes
- Diversion: The juvenile court intake officer may divert the case away from formal proceedings. Montana does not impose statutory time limits on court diversions.
- Probation: Youth may be placed on probation with conditions such as community service, counseling, or educational programs.
- Youth Reporting Centers: These community-based programs help youth meet probation requirements and build skills to reduce reoffending.
- Incarceration: In serious cases, juvenile detention is possible.
Transfer to Adult Court
For serious sex offenses, there is always a risk that the case will be transferred to adult court, especially for older teens (ages 16-17). Adult prosecution removes juvenile protections and exposes the minor to the full range of adult penalties.
What to Do If Charged
Given the severity of Montana's laws, immediate action is essential if you or your child faces a sexting investigation.
Do Not Speak to Police
You cannot talk your way out of a felony investigation. Anything you say, including seemingly innocent statements like "yes, I sent it, but we are dating," amounts to a confession. Assert your right to remain silent and ask for a lawyer immediately.
Do Not Delete Evidence
Once an investigation starts, deleting photos or messages can result in a separate felony charge for Tampering with Physical Evidence under MCA § 45-7-207. This offense carries up to 10 years in prison and a $50,000 fine. Let your attorney handle the evidence.
Hire a Specialist
You need a criminal defense attorney experienced in sex crimes and juvenile justice. A general practitioner may not understand the nuances of negotiating these specific felony charges down or navigating the juvenile court system.
This article provides general legal information about Montana sexting laws as of March 2026. Laws change frequently, and this information should not be considered legal advice. If you are facing charges, consult with a qualified Montana criminal defense attorney immediately.
More Montana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is sexting a felony in Montana?
Yes. Because Montana has no specific teen sexting misdemeanor, sexting involving minors falls under the Sexual Abuse of Children statute (MCA § 45-5-625), which is a felony. Possession of material depicting a minor carries up to 10 years in prison. Production or distribution carries up to 100 years or life imprisonment.
Can a minor be charged with sexting in Montana?
Yes. Minors can be charged as delinquents through youth court. The mandatory minimum sentences do not apply to offenders under 18 (MCA § 46-18-222), giving judges more discretion. A youth adjudicated in youth court is also exempt from sex offender registration under MCA § 41-5-1513(1)(d) unless the court finds a prior sexual offense adjudication or that registration is necessary to protect the public. However, older teens risk being transferred to adult court for serious sex offenses, where neither the sentencing exception nor the registration exemption applies.
Does Montana have a Romeo and Juliet exception for sexting?
No. Montana's age-difference rules for sexual offenses change the sentencing range or make consent ineffective rather than excuse the conduct, and they apply only to physical sexual contact, not to the creation, distribution, or possession of images. Being 16 or older removes age as a basis for incapacity to consent to sexual conduct, but it does not remove the image laws that protect minors.
Is revenge porn illegal in Montana?
Yes. Since 2019, MCA § 45-8-213(1)(d) makes it illegal to publish or distribute intimate images of a person without their consent when done with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure, or with the purpose to obtain money or other valuable consideration. That second purpose is an independent alternative, so extortion and profit motives are covered too. A first offense is a misdemeanor. A second or subsequent offense is a felony with up to 5 years in prison and a $25,000 fine.
What should I do if I receive an unsolicited nude photo of a minor?
Delete the image immediately and tell the sender to stop. Receiving an unsolicited image is generally not a crime. However, keeping, saving, screenshotting, or forwarding the image to anyone else constitutes possession or distribution of child pornography under Montana law. If you are concerned about the situation, consult an attorney before taking any other action.
Updates
Reworded the consent discussion in neutral statutory terms and corrected the FAQ: Montana's age-difference rules in MCA 45-5-503 change the sentencing range and do not create an exception.
Corrected the sex offender registration guidance to reflect the youth court exemption in MCA 41-5-1513(1)(d), added Montana's two on-point sextortion statutes, restored the lewdness qualifier to the definition of sexual conduct, added the pecuniary alternative to the revenge porn intent element, and repointed the age of consent citation to MCA 45-5-501 and 45-5-503.
Fixed the dead HB 192 citation link, added the 2025 federal TAKE IT DOWN Act to the federal-jurisdiction discussion, and updated the revenge-porn section to reflect a further 2025 state amendment that extends MCA 45-8-213 to cover AI-generated/deepfake images, not just authentic ones.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 45
§ 45-5-625Sexual Abuse Of ChildrenIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
45-5-625. Sexual abuse of children. (1) A person commits the offense of sexual abuse of children if the person: (a) knowingly employs, uses, or permits the employment or use of a child in an exhibition of sexual conduct, actual or simulated; (b) knowingly photographs, films, videotapes, develops or duplicates the photographs, films, or videotapes, or records a child engaging in sexual conduct, actual or simulated; (c) knowingly, by any means of communication, including electronic communication or in person, persuades, entices, counsels, coerces, encourages, directs, or procures a child under 16 years of age or a person, including a law enforcement officer using an undercover or fictitious identity, whom the offender believes to be a child under 16 years of age to engage in sexual conduct, actual or simulated, or to view sexually explicit material or acts for the purpose of inducing or persuading a child to participate in any sexual activity that is illegal; (d) knowingly processes, develops, prints, publishes, transports, distributes, sells, exhibits, or advertises any visual or print medium, including a medium by use of electronic communication in which a child is engaged in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In State v. T. Brennan (2025) the Montana Supreme Court held that section 45-5-625(1)(a) reaches in-person sexualized viewing of a child, requiring no recording or payment, and reversed a dismissal. Griffin v. State (2003) held Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition inapplicable because subsection (1)(e) covers actual children.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Hamilton (Montana Supreme Court 2007, 338 Mont. 142)“…Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68A.090, is reasonably equivalent to § 45-5-625, MCA, sexual abuse of children. ¶8 A sex…”
- State v. T. Brennan (Montana Supreme Court 2025, 2025 MT 46)“…te v. Felde, 2021 MT 1, ¶ 16, 402 Mont. 391, 478 P.3d 825. Section 45-5-625, MCA, broadly prohibits the victimization of…”
- City of Great Falls v. M.K. Enterprises, Inc. (Montana Supreme Court 1987, 225 Mont. 292)“…oths have existed in Great Falls. It is a crime in Montana, Section 45-5-625, MCA, to use a child for or to expose him to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Montana Age of Consent Laws: Statutes, Penalties and Reporting, Montana Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Montana Pornography Laws (2026): No General Obscenity Ban
§ 45-8-213Privacy In CommunicationsIn forcecited in 51 of our articles
45-8-213. Privacy in communications. (1) Except as provided in 69-6-104, a person commits the offense of violating privacy in communications if the person knowingly or purposely: (a) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure, communicates with a person by electronic communication and threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to the person or property of the person or makes repeated use of obscene, lewd, or profane language or repeated lewd or lascivious suggestions; (b) uses an electronic communication to attempt to extort money or any other thing of value from a person or to disturb by repeated communications the peace, quiet, or right of privacy of a person at the place where the communications are received; (c) records or causes to be recorded a conversation by use of a hidden electronic or mechanical device that reproduces a human conversation without the knowledge of all parties to the conversation; (d) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure or to obtain money or other valuable consideration, publishes, distributes, or discloses real or digitally fabricated printed or electronic photographs, pictures, images, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Dugan (2013) struck the statute's prima facie intent clause as overbroad. State v. Brown (1988) noted the statute still bars recording without all participants' permission and rejected an overbreadth attack on its public-official exception. State v. DuBray (2003) found no violation where the defendant knew of the recording.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Smith (Montana Supreme Court 2004, 322 Mont. 206)✓A man who phoned threats to kill his estranged wife's boyfriend argued he should have been charged under section 45-8-213(1)(a) instead of assault with a weapon. The court held the two statutes punish different conduct, so the charge was within prosecutorial discretion.
- State v. Dugan (Montana Supreme Court 2013, 369 Mont. 39)“…rbroad, the Court today strikes the prima facie language in § 45-8-213, MCA. However, a narrow application would be…”
- In re C.S. (Montana Supreme Court 1984, 210 Mont. 144)“…n of privacy in communication, a misdemeanor as provided in Section 45-8-213, MCA. The facts underlying the offense were…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can You Record ICE Agents? Know Your Rights by State (2026), Massachusetts Phone Call Recording Laws, Montana Recording Laws (2026): Announcement Exception and Penalties
§ 45-5-502Sexual AssaultIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
45-5-502. Sexual assault. (1) A person who knowingly subjects another person to any sexual contact without consent commits the offense of sexual assault. (2) Except as provided in subsections (3) and (4): (a) on a first conviction for sexual assault, the offender shall be fined an amount not to exceed $1,000 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 1 year, or both; (b) on a second conviction for sexual assault, the offender shall be fined an amount not to exceed $5,000 or be imprisoned for a term not to exceed 5 years, or both; and (c) on a third and subsequent conviction for sexual assault, the offender shall be fined an amount not to exceed $10,000 or be imprisoned for a term not to exceed 10 years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 134 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Alvin Duncan (Montana Supreme Court 2008, 343 Mont. 220)“…ern , ¶ 19. Here, three of the charges were brought under § 45-5-502, MCA. Two of the offenses involved the same…”
- State v. Legg (Montana Supreme Court 2004, 319 Mont. 362)“…to the offense of sexual assault, a felony in violation of § 45-5-502, MCA (2001). We affirm. ¶2 Legg rai…”
- State v. Cameron (Montana Supreme Court 1992, 253 Mont. 95)“…harged with two counts of felony sexual assault pursuant to § 45-5-502, MCA. On September 4, 1990, in the District…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Age of Consent Laws by State: Statutes, Protections and Reporting, Montana Expungement Laws: Misdemeanor Eligibility, Process, and Limits (2026)
§ 45-5-203IntimidationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
45-5-203. Intimidation. (1) A person commits the offense of intimidation when, with the purpose to cause another to perform or to omit the performance of any act, the person communicates to another, under circumstances that reasonably tend to produce a fear that it will be carried out, a threat to perform without lawful authority any of the following acts: (a) inflict physical harm on the person threatened or any other person; (b) subject any person to physical confinement or restraint; or (c) commit any felony. (2) A person commits the offense of intimidation if the person knowingly communicates a threat or false report of a pending fire, explosion, or disaster that would endanger life or property. (3) A person convicted of the offense of intimidation shall be imprisoned in the state prison for any term not to exceed 10 years or be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McCarthy (Montana Supreme Court 2004, 324 Mont. 1)“…was convicted of Intimidation, a felony, in violation of § 45-5-203, MCA, for threats made to probation and paro…”
- State v. Ross (Montana Supreme Court 1995, 269 Mont. 347)“…his conviction of intimida- tion, in violation of 5 45-5-203, MCA, in the Fourth Judicial District Court…”
- State v. Hawk (Montana Supreme Court 1997, 285 Mont. 183)“…Plenty Hawk was charged with Intimidation pursuant to õ 45-5-203, MCA (1995). He was tried by a jury on Sep…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is Blackmail Illegal in Montana? Extortion Laws and Penalties
§ 45-7-207Tampering With Or Fabricating Physical Evidence -- PenaltiesIn force
45-7-207. Tampering with or fabricating physical evidence -- penalties. (1) A person commits the offense of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence if, believing that an official proceeding or investigation is pending or about to be instituted, the person: (a) alters, destroys, conceals, or removes any record, document, or thing with purpose to impair its verity or availability in the proceeding or investigation; or (b) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing knowing it to be false and with purpose to mislead any person who is or may be engaged in the proceeding or investigation. (2) (a) Except as provided in subsection (2)(b), a person convicted of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 10 years or be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 39 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Clifford (Montana Supreme Court 2005, 328 Mont. 300)“…ring with or fabricating physical evidence in violation of § 45-7-207, MCA (1995), and threats and other improper…”
- State v. Staat (Montana Supreme Court 1991, 251 Mont. 1)“…proving the necessary mental state for the crime charged. Section 45-7-207, MCA (1989), states in pertinent part: “(1…”
- State v. Peplow (Montana Supreme Court 2001, 307 Mont. 172)“…titutes the crime of tampering with physical evidence under § 45-7-207, MCA; 2. Whether the District Court e…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 45-5-501DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
45-5-501. Definitions. (1) (a) As used in 45-5-502, 45-5-503, and 45-5-508, the term "consent" means words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact and is further defined but not limited by the following: (i) an expression of lack of consent through words or conduct means there is no consent or that consent has been withdrawn; (ii) a current or previous dating or social or sexual relationship by itself or the manner of dress of the person involved with the accused in the conduct at issue does not constitute consent; and (iii) lack of consent may be inferred based on all of the surrounding circumstances and must be considered in determining whether a person gave consent.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ellis (Montana Supreme Court 2009, 351 Mont. 95)“…he inability of a child under sixteen to consent to sex. Section 45-5-501, MCA. Notably both §§ 41-5-331 and 45-5-501,…”
- State v. Thompson (Montana Supreme Court 1990, 243 Mont. 28)“…tate failed to meet the element of "without consent1'under 5 45-5-501, MCA. I…”
- State v. Higley (Montana Supreme Court 1980, 190 Mont. 412)“…t h o u t c o n s e n t , " a s f o u n d i n s e c t i o n 45-5-501, MCA: "You are i n s t r u c t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 45-5-503Sexual Intercourse Without ConsentIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
45-5-503. Sexual intercourse without consent. (1) A person who knowingly has sexual intercourse with another person without consent or with another person who is incapable of consent commits the offense of sexual intercourse without consent. A person may not be convicted under this section based on the age of the person's spouse, as provided in 45-5-501(1)(b)(iv). (2) A person convicted of sexual intercourse without consent shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not more than 20 years and may be fined not more than $50,000, except as provided in 46-18-219, 46-18-222, and subsections (3), (4), and (5) of this section. (3) (a) If the victim is less than 16 years old and the offender is 4 or more years older than the victim or if the offender inflicts bodily injury on anyone in the course of committing sexual intercourse without consent, the offender shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not less than 4 years or more than 100 years and may be fined not more than $50,000, except as provided in 46-18-219 and 46-18-222.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 167 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ariegwe (Montana Supreme Court 2007, 338 Mont. 442)“…xual intercourse without consent, a felony, in violation of § 45-5-503, MCA (2001), and Count II, unlawful transact…”
- State v. Brodniak (Montana Supreme Court 1986, 221 Mont. 212)“…out consent, Preston was raped not once, but several times. Section 45-5-503, MCA. Brodniak’s proposed instruction No. 12…”
- Hagan v. State (Montana Supreme Court 1994, 265 Mont. 31)“…empted sexual intercourse without consent, in violation of 5 45-5-503, MCA (1987). Hagan alleged that his convic…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 46
§ 46-18-222Exceptions To Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Restrictions On Deferred Imposition And Suspended Execution Of Sentence, And Restrictions On Parole EligibilityIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
46-18-222. Exceptions to mandatory minimum sentences, restrictions on deferred imposition and suspended execution of sentence, and restrictions on parole eligibility. Mandatory minimum sentences prescribed by the laws of this state, mandatory life sentences prescribed by 46-18-219, the restrictions on deferred imposition and suspended execution of sentence prescribed by 45-9-101(6), 45-9-103(3), 46-18-201(1)(b), 46-18-205, 46-18-221(3), 46-18-224, and 46-18-502(3), and restrictions on parole eligibility prescribed by 45-5-503(4), 45-5-507(5), 45-5-601(3), 45-5-625(4), 45-5-711, 45-9-101(6), and 45-9-103(3) do not apply if: (1) the offender was less than 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense for which the offender is to be sentenced; (2) the offender's mental capacity, at the time of the commission of the offense for which the offender is to be sentenced, was significantly impaired, although not so impaired as to constitute a defense to the prosecution. However, a voluntarily induced intoxicated or drugged condition may not be considered an impairment for the purposes of this subsection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 46 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Arlington (Montana Supreme Court 1994, 265 Mont. 127)“…wo years for the use of a weapon in the assault. Section 46-18-222, MCA, provides for six exceptions to mandat…”
- State v. Zabawa (Montana Supreme Court 1996, 279 Mont. 307)“…e exceptions to the mandatory minimum sentence contained in § 46-18-222, MCA? The State of Montana (State) char…”
- State v. Hubbard (Montana Supreme Court 1982, 200 Mont. 106)“…t the statutory exceptions of the enhancement statute. See, section 46-18-222, MCA. The controlling language here is con…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Is a Life Sentence in Montana? (2026 Guide), Montana Felony vs Misdemeanor: Sentences, Fines and Probation (2026)
§ 46-23-504Persons Required To Register -- ProcedureIn force
46-23-504. Persons required to register -- procedure. (1) Except as provided in 41-5-1513 and 45-5-503(5), a sexual or violent offender: (a) shall register immediately upon conclusion of the sentencing hearing if the offender is not sentenced to confinement or is not sentenced to the department and placed in confinement by the department; (b) must be registered as provided in 46-23-503 at least 10 days prior to release from confinement if sentenced to confinement or sentenced to the department and placed in confinement by the department; (c) shall register within 3 business days of entering a county of this state for the purpose of residing or setting up a temporary residence for 10 days or more or for an aggregate period exceeding 30 days in a calendar year; and (d) who is a transient shall register within 3 business days of entering a county of this state. (2) Registration under subsection (1) must be with the appropriate registration agency. If an offender registers with a police department, the department shall notify the sheriff's office of the county in which the municipality is located of the registration.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Pearrow (Montana Supreme Court 2011, 359 Mont. 177)“…sign and return. This annual verification is required under § 46-23-504, MCA (2005) and (2007). It is therefore evi…”
- State v. Whitmer (Montana Supreme Court 1997, 285 Mont. 100)“…Did the Montana Legislature intend the 1995 amendments to 46-23-504, MCA (1989), which extended the registration…”
- State v. Wright (Montana Supreme Court 2016, 2016 MT 278N)“…as a sexual or violent offender, a felony, in violation of § 46-23-504, MCA. We address: (1) Whether the State of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 46-23-502DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
46-23-502. Definitions. As used in Title 45, chapter 5, part 3 and parts 5 through 7, 46-18-255, and this part, the following definitions apply: (1) "Department" means the department of corrections provided for in 2-15-2301. (2) "Foreign offenses" means a conviction for a sexual offense involving any of the conduct listed in this section that was obtained under the laws of Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, or New Zealand, or under the laws of any foreign country when the United States department of state, in its country reports on human rights practices, has concluded that an independent judiciary generally or vigorously enforced the right to a fair trial in that country during the year in which the conviction was obtained. (3) "Mental abnormality" means a congenital or acquired condition that affects the mental, emotional, or volitional capacity of a person in a manner that predisposes the person to the commission of one or more sexual offenses to a degree that makes the person a menace to the health and safety of other persons. (4) "Municipality" means an entity that has incorporated as a city or town.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- City of Bozeman v. Cantu (Montana Supreme Court 2013, 369 Mont. 81)“…ere charged with a sexual or violent offense as defined in § 46-23-502, MCA. Cantu argues that because his offense…”
- State v. Holt (Montana Supreme Court 2011, 359 Mont. 308)“…nder consideration was not a “sexual offense” as defined in § 46-23-502, MCA, the District Court should not have att…”
- In re C.D.H. (Montana Supreme Court 2009, 349 Mont. 1)“…r July 1,1989. See Compiler’s Comments to §§ 41-5-1513 and 46-23-502, MCA. ¶25 C.D.H. contends that the court c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2251Sexual exploitation of childrenIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
Any person who employs, uses, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any minor to engage in, or who has a minor assist any other person to engage in, or who transports any minor in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, with the intent that such minor engage in, any sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct, shall be punished as provided under subsection (e), if such person knows or has reason to know that such visual depiction will be transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed, if that visual depiction was produced or transmitted using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or if such visual depiction has actually been transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,812 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Irey (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2010, 612 F.3d 1160)“…iled on December 13, 2006, Irey was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (c). The indictment alleged that he “di…”
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 535 U.S. 234)“…ether the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), 18 U. S. C. § 2251 et seq., abridges the freedom of sp…”
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…But as in the criminalization of pornography production at 18 U. S. C. § 2251 , see infra, at 76, n. 5, the perpetr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026), Kentucky Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections, Kansas Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
United States Code Title 15
§ 6851Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate imagesIn forcecited in 27 of our articles
In this section: The term “commercial pornographic content” means any material that is subject to the record keeping requirements under section 2257 of title 18. The term “consent” means an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization made by the individual free from force, fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. The term “depicted individual” means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction and who is identifiable by virtue of the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the visual depiction. The term “disclose” means to transfer, publish, distribute, or make accessible.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):District courts have begun applying the 15 U.S.C. 6851 private action for nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. Goodnight v. Hammons (2025) read its unwelcome conduct and public concern exceptions narrowly and let the claim proceed. Parkes v. Walker II (2025) dismissed a claim that did not plead interstate commerce.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- TILLE v. KAPLAN (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)“…iolence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2022 (“VAWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6851. Compl., D.E. 1, at 7-8. The allegati…”
- Turner v. Echols (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025)✓A pretrial detainee sued an FBI agent under 15 U.S.C. 6851 over intimate images found in a warrantless phone search; the court dismissed, finding he never alleged he was depicted, never plausibly alleged disclosure, and that the law enforcement exception applied.
- Goodnight v. Hammons (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2025)✓A wife allegedly accessed her husband's devices, took his girlfriend's nude photos and sent them to a coworker; the court let the 15 U.S.C. 6851 claim proceed, rejecting the statute's unwelcome-conduct and public-concern exceptions as covering discovered infidelity.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), Mississippi Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026), Connecticut Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Montana Code Annotated, Title 41
§ 41-5-1513Disposition -- Delinquent Youth -- RestrictionsIn force
41-5-1513. Disposition -- delinquent youth -- restrictions. (1) If a youth is found to be a delinquent youth, the youth court may enter its judgment making one or more of the following dispositions: (a) any one or more of the dispositions provided in 41-5-1512; (b) subject to 41-5-1504, 41-5-1512(1)(m)(i), and 41-5-1522, commit the youth to the department for placement in a correctional facility or other appropriate program as determined by the department and recommend to the department that the youth not be released until the youth reaches 18 years of age. The court may not place a youth adjudicated to be a delinquent youth in a correctional facility for an act that would be a misdemeanor if committed by an adult unless: (i) the youth committed four or more misdemeanors in the prior 12 months; (ii) a psychiatrist or a psychologist licensed by the state or a licensed clinical professional counselor or a licensed clinical social worker has evaluated the youth and recommends placement in a correctional facility; and (iii) the court finds that the youth will present a danger to the public if the youth is not placed in a correctional facility.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In re K.M.G. (Montana Supreme Court 2010, 356 Mont. 91)“…ment of Corrections for placement at Pine Hills pursuant to § 41-5-1513, MCA (2007)? ¶4 2. Did the Youth Court err…”
- In re C.D.H. (Montana Supreme Court 2009, 349 Mont. 1)“…argues that application of the registration requirement in § 41-5-1513, MCA, would violate the prohibition on ex po…”
- In re T.M.R. (Montana Supreme Court 2006, 334 Mont. 64)“…ance with the youth court’s disposition under § 41-5-1512 or 41-5-1513, MCA. T.M.R. was adjudicated a delinquent yo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- MCA § 45-5-625 - Sexual Abuse of Children(leg.mt.gov).gov
- MCA § 45-5-502 - Sexual Assault(leg.mt.gov).gov
- MCA § 45-8-213 - Privacy in Communications(leg.mt.gov).gov
- MCA § 45-8-213 - Privacy in Communications (current text, amended by 2019 HB 192 and 2025 Ch. 686)(leg.mt.gov).gov
- MCA § 46-18-222 - Exceptions to Mandatory Minimum Sentences(law.justia.com)
- Montana Sex Offender Registry - Registration Requirements(dojmt.gov).gov
- MCA § 45-5-203 - Intimidation(leg.mt.gov).gov
- MCA § 45-7-207 - Tampering with Physical Evidence(leg.mt.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 2251 - Sexual Exploitation of Children (Federal)(law.cornell.edu)
- Montana Board of Crime Control - Juvenile Justice(mbcc.mt.gov).gov
- 2024 Montana Code § 45-5-625 - Full Text(law.justia.com)
- 2025 Montana Code § 45-8-213 - Full Text(law.justia.com)
- TAKE IT DOWN Act, Public Law 119-12 (2025)(congress.gov).gov
- MCA § 45-5-625 - Sexual abuse of children (current text, Montana Code Annotated 2025)(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 45-8-213 - Privacy in communications (current text, Montana Code Annotated 2025)(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 45-5-203 - Intimidation (current text, Montana Code Annotated 2025)(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 45-5-501 - Definitions (consent; a person less than 16 years old is incapable of consent)(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 45-5-503 - Sexual intercourse without consent(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 41-5-1513 - Disposition of delinquent youth (youth court exemption from sex offender registration)(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 46-23-504 - Persons required to register(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA § 46-23-502 - Definitions (sexual offense includes 45-5-625)(mca.legmt.gov)