Montana
Montana Pornography Laws (2026): No General Obscenity Ban
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Montana's obscenity statute is narrower than most states': five of its six prohibitions require conduct aimed at a person under 18, and only one, the ban on advertising or promoting the sale of obscene material, applies no matter who the audience is. Nothing in it reaches an adult's private possession or viewing. Age verification, child exploitation, nonconsensual images, and public exposure are handled by separate statutes, several with unusual enforcement structures worth understanding before assuming Montana works like other states.
Is Pornography Legal in Montana? What the Obscenity Statute Does and Does Not Reach
Montana's obscenity statute, Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-201, is structured differently from most states' obscenity laws. Five of its six prohibitions are conditioned on conduct directed at a person under 18: selling or delivering obscene material to a minor, presenting an obscene performance to a minor, publishing or exhibiting obscene material to a minor, performing an obscene act before a minor, and creating, buying, or possessing obscene material with the purpose of disseminating it to a minor.
The sixth, subsection (1)(f), has no age element. It reaches anyone who "advertises or otherwise promotes the sale of obscene material or materials represented or held out by the person to be obscene," whoever the audience is. That is a general-application prohibition, so it is not accurate to say Montana has no adult-facing obscenity offense at all.
The statute also carries a Miller-form definition of obscenity in subsection (2): material depicting perverted or patently offensive ultimate sexual acts, masturbation, excretory functions, or lewd exhibition of the genitals that, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest under contemporary community standards, portrays that conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A violation carries a fine of $500 to $1,000 and/or up to six months in county jail.
What the statute does not do is reach an adult's private possession or viewing of obscene, non-CSAM material, or a plain adult-to-adult sale, delivery, or exhibition as such, which subsections (1)(a) through (1)(e) criminalize only when a minor is the recipient. Those are genuine absences in Montana law, not exceptions written into the statute.
18 U.S.C. Section 2257, the federal record-keeping requirement for producers of sexually explicit content, applies in Montana regardless of state law and is not created by any Montana statute.
Montana's Age-Verification Law: Private Lawsuits Only
Montana requires age verification for adult content, but the law's enforcement mechanism has changed significantly since it was first enacted. Mont. Code Ann. Section 30-14-159, originally enacted as SB 544 in 2023 and amended by Chapter 199, Laws of 2025, requires a commercial entity that publishes material harmful to minors on a website to use reasonable age-verification methods, effective January 1, 2024.
The significant change came in 2025: an amendment stripped the Montana Attorney General of any authority to enforce the statute. The law now states that it "may only be enforced by individuals claiming damages," meaning only a private civil lawsuit, not a state enforcement action, can hold a noncompliant site accountable.
That amendment had a direct legal consequence. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Knudsen (D. Mont., CV 24-67-M-DWM), the industry's federal challenge to the law, was dismissed in August 2025 for lack of Article III standing: even assuming the Attorney General kept enough connection to the law's enforcement to be sued, an injunction against him would not have redressed the plaintiffs' injury because private individuals could still sue under the law. The dismissal did not evaluate or strike down the underlying law. Montana's age-verification requirement, narrowed to private civil enforcement, remains in effect.
For the full compliance picture, see the Montana age-verification law page.
Child Sexual Abuse Material and Other Offenses Against Minors
Montana's sexual abuse of children statute, Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-625, covers employing, using, or permitting a child in an exhibition of sexual conduct, photographing or filming such conduct, persuading a child under 16 to engage in sexual conduct, and processing, distributing, or possessing such material. Under subsection (2)(a), a general violation, including production and distribution, is punishable by life imprisonment or a state prison term not to exceed 100 years, with a fine of up to $10,000 and no statutory minimum. Subsection (2)(b) adds a floor only when the victim is under 16, or is believed to be: life imprisonment, or a term of not less than 4 years and not more than 100 years, with the same $10,000 fine cap. Possession specifically carries a fine of up to $10,000 and up to 10 years in prison.

Penalties increase sharply when the victim is young. When the victim was 12 or younger and the offender was 18 or older, the law mandates a 100-year prison term, with no suspension or deferral of the first 25 years and no parole eligibility during that period, along with a fine of up to $50,000, mandatory sex-offender treatment, and lifetime supervision with satellite-based monitoring after release.
Montana handles cases involving minors who create or share images of themselves or other minors through a separate legal framework, covered on the Montana sexting laws page rather than duplicated here.
Nonconsensual Intimate Images (Revenge Porn)
Montana addresses nonconsensual intimate images within its privacy-in-communications statute, Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-213. Subsection (1)(d) criminalizes publishing, distributing, or disclosing a real or digitally fabricated intimate image of an identifiable person without their consent, done with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, injure, or obtain money or other valuable consideration; subsection (1)(e) separately covers possessing such an image and threatening to disclose it, but its only purpose element is obtaining money or other valuable consideration, so a threat made solely to harass falls outside it. A first offense under either subsection is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $500 and/or up to six months in county jail. A second or subsequent conviction is a felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $25,000. The statute exempts voluntary public exposure, disclosures made in the public interest, law-enforcement reporting, and historic, artistic, scientific, or educational material.
This state-law claim is separate from the federal Take It Down Act, which requires platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate imagery, including AI-generated deepfakes, once notified. For platform removal steps and a state-by-state comparison, see Revenge Porn Laws by State.
Public Exposure, Including by Electronic Means
Montana's indecent exposure statute, Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-504, covers knowingly or purposely exposing genitals or intimate parts under circumstances likely to cause affront or alarm, done to abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade another person, or to arouse or gratify sexual desire. Notably, the statute reaches exposure "by any means including electronic communication," so it is not limited to in-person conduct.
A first offense carries a fine of up to $500 and/or up to six months in county jail. A second conviction carries a fine of up to $1,000 and/or up to a year. Indecent exposure to a minor is a separate offense, not a sentencing enhancement, and it is defined narrowly: the offender must know the conduct will be observed by a person under 16, or believe the person to be under 16, and must be more than 4 years older than that victim. Exposure observed by a 16- or 17-year-old does not fall within it. The offense carries a fine of up to $50,000 and a state prison term of not less than 4 years, up to 100 years, unless the judge makes a written finding of good cause to impose a term of less than 4 years.
Adult Businesses in Montana
Montana has a statewide sexually-oriented-business rule on the books, but a federal court has blocked the state from enforcing it. Mont. Code Ann. Sections 45-8-117 and 45-8-118 define a "sexually oriented business" as a nightclub, bar, restaurant, or similar commercial enterprise that provides live nude entertainment or a sexually oriented performance to an audience of two or more people and authorizes on-premises consumption of alcohol, and they bar anyone under 18 from being on the premises during a sexually oriented performance. The statute states that the rule is uniform throughout the state and its political subdivisions.
Both sections were enacted as sections 1 and 2 of House Bill 359 (Ch. 719, Laws of 2023), and House Bill 359 is currently unenforceable. A federal district court preliminarily enjoined the Montana Attorney General and the Superintendent of Public Instruction from instituting, maintaining, or prosecuting any enforcement proceedings under the act, and on March 13, 2026 the Ninth Circuit affirmed that injunction in Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen, No. 23-3581, holding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on their First Amendment challenge because the act's sexually-oriented-performance provisions are content-based restrictions on expressive activity that are not narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest. The sections remain in the code, so the penalties below are what they provide on paper, but state officials are barred from bringing a case under them while the injunction stands.

On paper, the penalties fall on the owner, operator, manager, or an employee: a fine of $1,000 to $5,000 for a first offense, $2,500 to $5,000 for a second offense, and a flat $10,000 for a third or subsequent offense, along with possible county or municipal license revocation.
Penalties at a Glance
| Offense | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Obscenity (dissemination to a minor; advertising or promoting the sale of obscene material) | Section 45-8-201 | $500-$1,000 and/or up to 6 months |
| Sexual abuse of children (general / victim under 16 / possession) | Section 45-5-625 | Life or up to 100 years plus $10,000 fine, no minimum; life or 4-100 years if the victim is under 16; possession up to 10 years/$10,000 |
| Nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images (1st / 2nd+) | Section 45-8-213 | Up to $500/6 months (misdemeanor); up to $25,000/5 years (felony) |
| Indecent exposure (1st / 2nd / to a minor under 16) | Section 45-5-504 | Up to $500/6 months; up to $1,000/1 year; up to $50,000 and 4-100 years (felony; under 4 years only on a written good-cause finding) |
| Minor admitted to a sexually oriented business (1st/2nd/3rd+) | Section 45-8-118 | $1,000-$5,000; $2,500-$5,000; $10,000 flat plus license revocation. State enforcement preliminarily enjoined; injunction affirmed by the Ninth Circuit on March 13, 2026 |
| Age-verification noncompliance | Section 30-14-159 | Private civil damages only; no state enforcement |
Practical Risks Beyond the Statute
State criminal exposure is only part of the picture. Workplace device and network policies can make viewing adult content on an employer's system grounds for discipline or termination even where no law was broken. Federal law adds further obligations regardless of Montana's rules: 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 imposes record-keeping duties on producers, and the federal Take It Down Act creates separate platform takedown obligations for nonconsensual intimate imagery. Anyone facing a specific legal question involving these laws should consult an attorney for advice specific to their situation.
More Montana Laws
- Montana Recording Laws (2026): Announcement Exception and Penalties
- Montana Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties
- Montana Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media
- Montana Court Records: How to Search the New Public Access Portals
- Montana Data Privacy Laws: MCDPA Consumer Rights Guide

Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is pornography illegal in Montana?
Private adult possession and viewing are not criminalized by any Montana statute. Most of Montana's obscenity statute, Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-201, reaches only conduct directed at a person under 18, such as selling or providing obscene material to a minor. One subsection, (1)(f), applies regardless of the audience's age: advertising or otherwise promoting the sale of obscene material. There is no subsection criminalizing a plain adult-to-adult sale as such.
Does Montana have a general obscenity law like other states?
Partly. Section 45-8-201 carries a Miller-form definition of obscenity in subsection (2), and subsection (1)(f) applies that definition to anyone who advertises or otherwise promotes the sale of obscene material, with no age element. The statute's other five prohibitions are all conditioned on conduct directed at a minor, so Montana has no subsection reaching a plain adult-to-adult sale, delivery, or exhibition, and none reaching private adult possession.
Does Montana require age verification for porn sites?
Yes, but with an unusual enforcement structure. Mont. Code Ann. Section 30-14-159 requires commercial websites publishing material harmful to minors to use reasonable age-verification methods. Since a 2025 amendment, the law can only be enforced through a private civil lawsuit by someone claiming damages; the Montana Attorney General no longer has authority to enforce it.
Was Montana's age-verification law struck down in court?
No. A federal lawsuit, Free Speech Coalition v. Knudsen, was dismissed in August 2025, but the dismissal was for lack of standing, because an injunction against the Attorney General could not stop private individuals from suing under the law, not a ruling on the law's constitutionality. The statute, as narrowed to private enforcement, remains in effect.
What are the penalties for child sexual abuse material in Montana?
Under Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-625, a general violation, including employing a child in sexual conduct or distributing such material, is punishable by life imprisonment or up to 100 years, with a fine up to $10,000 and no statutory minimum. A 4-year minimum applies under subsection (2)(b) only when the victim is under 16. Possession specifically carries up to 10 years and up to $10,000. When the victim is 12 or younger and the offender is an adult, the law mandates a 100-year term with no parole eligibility for the first 25 years.
Is sharing someone's intimate photos without consent illegal in Montana?
Yes. Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-213 makes it a crime to publish, distribute, or disclose real or digitally fabricated intimate images of an identifiable person without consent, done to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or obtain money. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by up to $500 and 6 months; a second or later conviction is a felony punishable by up to 5 years and a $25,000 fine.
What counts as indecent exposure in Montana?
Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-504 covers knowingly or purposely exposing genitals or intimate parts under circumstances likely to cause affront or alarm, including exposure carried out by electronic communication. A first offense carries up to $500 and 6 months; a second conviction carries up to $1,000 and a year. Indecent exposure to a minor is a separate felony requiring a victim under 16 and an offender more than 4 years older; it carries a fine up to $50,000 and 4 to 100 years in state prison, though a judge may impose less than 4 years on a written finding of good cause.
Can adult businesses operate freely in Montana?
Those two sections bar anyone under 18 from being on the premises of a sexually oriented business, such as an alcohol-serving club offering live nude entertainment, during a sexually oriented performance, with fines escalating from $1,000 to $5,000 on a first offense up to a flat $10,000 plus possible license revocation on a third or later offense. But both were enacted as part of House Bill 359 (2023), and a federal court has preliminarily enjoined state enforcement of that act; the Ninth Circuit affirmed the injunction on March 13, 2026 in Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen. The sections remain on the books but the state cannot currently enforce them.
Updates
Corrected the description of Free Speech Coalition v. Knudsen to the ground the court actually relied on: an injunction against the Attorney General could not redress the plaintiffs' injury because private individuals can still sue under the law.
Corrected the description of Montana's obscenity statute, which does contain one general-application prohibition (advertising or promoting the sale of obscene material) and a Miller-form definition of obscenity; added that federal courts have enjoined enforcement of the sexually-oriented-business rule in Sections 45-8-117 and 45-8-118, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit in March 2026; and separated the correctly applicable penalty tiers under Sections 45-5-625 and 45-5-504.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Page published covering Montana's harmful-to-minors obscenity statute, its private-enforcement-only age-verification law, CSAM, nonconsensual-image, indecent-exposure, and adult-business statutes.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 45
§ 45-8-201ObscenityIn force
45-8-201. Obscenity. (1) A person commits the offense of obscenity when, with knowledge of the obscene nature of the material, the person purposely or knowingly: (a) sells, delivers, or provides or offers or agrees to sell, deliver, or provide any obscene writing, picture, record, or other representation or embodiment of the obscene to anyone under 18 years of age or a person, including a law enforcement officer using an undercover or fictitious identity, whom the offender believes to be under 18 years of age; (b) presents or directs an obscene play, dance, or other performance, or participates in that portion of the performance that makes it obscene, to anyone under 18 years of age; (c) publishes, exhibits, or otherwise makes available anything obscene to anyone under 18 years of age; (d) performs an obscene act or otherwise presents an obscene exhibition of the person's body to anyone under 18 years of age; (e) creates, buys, procures, or possesses obscene matter or material with the purpose to disseminate it to anyone under 18 years of age or a person, including a law enforcement officer using an undercover or fictitious identity, whom the offender believes to be under 18…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Price (Montana Supreme Court 1980, 191 Mont. 1)“…on, defendant contends that the State failed to comply with section 45-8-201, MCA, in that the State failed to admit evid…”
- City of Great Falls v. M.K. Enterprises, Inc. (Montana Supreme Court 1987, 225 Mont. 292)“…on of the general taxpayers. Likewise it is a crime under Section 45-8-201, MCA, purposely or *298 knowingly to provid…”
- New York v. Ferber (Supreme Court of the United States 1982, 458 U.S. 747)“…s. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann., Tit. 17, § 2911 (Supp. 1981-1982); Mont. Code Ann. § 45-8-201 (1981); N. M. Stat. Ann. §30-37-2 (Sup…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 45-8-213Privacy In CommunicationsIn forcecited in 50 of our articles
45-8-213. Privacy in communications. (1) Except as provided in 69-6-104, a person commits the offense of violating privacy in communications if the person knowingly or purposely: (a) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure, communicates with a person by electronic communication and threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to the person or property of the person or makes repeated use of obscene, lewd, or profane language or repeated lewd or lascivious suggestions; (b) uses an electronic communication to attempt to extort money or any other thing of value from a person or to disturb by repeated communications the peace, quiet, or right of privacy of a person at the place where the communications are received; (c) records or causes to be recorded a conversation by use of a hidden electronic or mechanical device that reproduces a human conversation without the knowledge of all parties to the conversation; (d) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure or to obtain money or other valuable consideration, publishes, distributes, or discloses real or digitally fabricated printed or electronic photographs, pictures, images, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Dugan (2013) struck the statute's prima facie intent clause as overbroad. State v. Brown (1988) noted the statute still bars recording without all participants' permission and rejected an overbreadth attack on its public-official exception. State v. DuBray (2003) found no violation where the defendant knew of the recording.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Smith (Montana Supreme Court 2004, 322 Mont. 206)✓A man who phoned threats to kill his estranged wife's boyfriend argued he should have been charged under section 45-8-213(1)(a) instead of assault with a weapon. The court held the two statutes punish different conduct, so the charge was within prosecutorial discretion.
- State v. Dugan (Montana Supreme Court 2013, 369 Mont. 39)“…rbroad, the Court today strikes the prima facie language in § 45-8-213, MCA. However, a narrow application would be…”
- In re C.S. (Montana Supreme Court 1984, 210 Mont. 144)“…n of privacy in communication, a misdemeanor as provided in Section 45-8-213, MCA. The facts underlying the offense were…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Montana Recording Laws (2026): Announcement Exception and Penalties, Montana Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Camera Rules, Privacy Rights, and Disputes (2026), Montana Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and Surveillance Rules (2026)
§ 45-5-625Sexual Abuse Of ChildrenIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
45-5-625. Sexual abuse of children. (1) A person commits the offense of sexual abuse of children if the person: (a) knowingly employs, uses, or permits the employment or use of a child in an exhibition of sexual conduct, actual or simulated; (b) knowingly photographs, films, videotapes, develops or duplicates the photographs, films, or videotapes, or records a child engaging in sexual conduct, actual or simulated; (c) knowingly, by any means of communication, including electronic communication or in person, persuades, entices, counsels, coerces, encourages, directs, or procures a child under 16 years of age or a person, including a law enforcement officer using an undercover or fictitious identity, whom the offender believes to be a child under 16 years of age to engage in sexual conduct, actual or simulated, or to view sexually explicit material or acts for the purpose of inducing or persuading a child to participate in any sexual activity that is illegal; (d) knowingly processes, develops, prints, publishes, transports, distributes, sells, exhibits, or advertises any visual or print medium, including a medium by use of electronic communication in which a child is engaged in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In State v. T. Brennan (2025) the Montana Supreme Court held that section 45-5-625(1)(a) reaches in-person sexualized viewing of a child, requiring no recording or payment, and reversed a dismissal. Griffin v. State (2003) held Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition inapplicable because subsection (1)(e) covers actual children.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Hamilton (Montana Supreme Court 2007, 338 Mont. 142)“…Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68A.090, is reasonably equivalent to § 45-5-625, MCA, sexual abuse of children. ¶8 A sex…”
- State v. T. Brennan (Montana Supreme Court 2025, 2025 MT 46)“…te v. Felde, 2021 MT 1, ¶ 16, 402 Mont. 391, 478 P.3d 825. Section 45-5-625, MCA, broadly prohibits the victimization of…”
- City of Great Falls v. M.K. Enterprises, Inc. (Montana Supreme Court 1987, 225 Mont. 292)“…oths have existed in Great Falls. It is a crime in Montana, Section 45-5-625, MCA, to use a child for or to expose him to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Montana Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Montana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Montana Age of Consent Laws: Statutes, Penalties and Reporting
§ 45-5-504Indecent ExposureIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
45-5-504. Indecent exposure. (1) A person commits the offense of indecent exposure if the person knowingly or purposely exposes the person's genitals or intimate parts by any means, including electronic communication as defined in 45-5-625(5)(a), under circumstances in which the person knows the conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm in order to: (a) abuse, humiliate, harass, violate the dignity of, or degrade another; or (b) arouse or gratify the person's own sexual response or desire or the sexual response or desire of any person. (2) (a) A person convicted of the offense of indecent exposure shall be fined an amount not to exceed $500 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of not more than 6 months, or both. (b) On a second conviction, the person shall be fined an amount not to exceed $1,000 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of not more than 1 year, or both. (c) On a third or subsequent conviction, the person shall be fined an amount not to exceed $10,000 or be imprisoned in a state prison for a term of not more than 10 years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Meeks (Montana Supreme Court 2002, 312 Mont. 126)“…eeks with indecent exposure, a misdemeanor, in violation of § 45-5-504, MCA (1997), indecent exposure, a high misd…”
- State v. Waldrup (Montana Supreme Court 1994, 264 Mont. 456)“…ith four counts of indecent exposure, a felony pursuant to 5 45-5-504, MCA. The District Court dismissed the…”
- State v. David Ommundson (Montana Supreme Court 2008, 346 Mont. 263)“…ailed to establish the elements of indecent exposure under § 45-5-504, MCA (2005). Ommundson appeals the District…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Montana Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Peeping, and Penalties (2026)
§ 45-8-118Restrictions On Sexually Oriented Businesses -- PenaltyIn force
45-8-118. Restrictions on sexually oriented businesses -- penalty. (1) A sexually oriented business may not allow a person under 18 years of age to enter the premises of the business during a sexually oriented performance. (2) The owner, operator, manager, or employee of a sexually oriented business who is convicted of violating this section shall be fined not less than $1,000 or more than $5,000 for the first offense, not less than $2,500 or more than $5,000 for the second offense, and for third and subsequent offenses be fined $10,000 and, if applicable, the county or municipality shall revoke the business license held by the offender. (3) Sections 20-7-135, 27-1-521, and 45-8-117 and this section are applicable and uniform throughout the state and any political subdivisions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2026)“…of business and professional licenses. See H.B. 359 §§ 2–4; Mont. Code Ann. §§ 45-8-118, 20-7-135, 27-1-521. Sixth, the FCC…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 45-8-117DefinitionsIn force
45-8-117. Definitions. As used in 45-8-117 and 45-8-118, the following definitions apply: (1) "Drag king" means a male or female performer who adopts a flamboyant or parodic male persona with glamorous or exaggerated costumes and makeup. (2) "Drag queen" means a male or female performer who adopts a flamboyant or parodic feminine persona with glamorous or exaggerated costumes and makeup. (3) "Drag story hour" means an event hosted by a drag queen or drag king who reads children's books and engages in other learning activities with minor children present. (4) "Nude" means: (a) entirely unclothed; or (b) clothed in a manner that leaves uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing any portion of the breast below the top of the areola of the breasts if the person is female or any portion of the genitals or buttocks. (5) "Prurient interest in sex" has the same meaning as provided in 45-8-205. (6) "Public property" means any real property owned or leased, in whole or part, by the state or a political subdivision, as defined in 2-9-101, or held in the name of a political subdivision by a department, board, or authority of the state or a political subdivision.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2026)“…ified across multiple titles. See H.B. 359 § 1 (codified at Mont. Code Ann. § 45-8-117); H.B. 359 § 2 (codified at Mont. Code.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 30
§ 30-14-159Publishing And Distribution Of Material Harmful To Minors -- Age Verification -- Requirements -- Penalties -- Exceptions -- Reporting -- DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
30-14-159. Publishing and distribution of material harmful to minors -- age verification -- requirements -- penalties -- exceptions -- reporting -- definitions. (1) A commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on the internet from a website that contains a substantial portion of the material must be held liable if the entity fails to perform reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of individuals attempting to access the material. (2) A commercial entity or third party that performs the required age verification may not retain any identifying information of the individual after access has been granted to the material. (3) (a) A commercial entity that is found to have violated this section is liable to an individual for damages resulting from a minor accessing the material, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees as ordered by the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Knudsen (District Court, D. Montana 2025)“…access the material.” $.B. 544 (Mont. 2023) (codified at Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-159) (“Age Verification Act” or the “Act”).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Montana Age Verification Law: SB 544 and the 2025 Amendment Explained
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-201 (Obscenity)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 30-14-159 (Age verification required for material harmful to minors)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-625 (Sexual abuse of children)(law.justia.com)
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-213 (Privacy in communications)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-504 (Indecent exposure)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Mont. Code Ann. Sections 45-8-117 to 45-8-118 (Restrictions on sexually oriented businesses)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen, No. 23-3581 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026) (affirming preliminary injunction barring enforcement of H.B. 359, which enacted Mont. Code Ann. Sections 45-8-117 and 45-8-118)(cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov)
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-5-625 (Sexual abuse of children)(mca.legmt.gov)
- Mont. Code Ann. Section 45-8-117 (Definitions, sexually oriented businesses)(mca.legmt.gov)