Wyoming
Wyoming Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules and Consent Guide
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wyoming is a one-party consent state under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702, meaning you may record any phone call you participate in without notifying the other party. No court order or warrant is required, and the rule applies to landlines, cell phones, and VoIP calls alike.
Wyoming's phone call recording laws are governed by the Communication Interception statute found in Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 7 of the Wyoming Statutes. The central provision, Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702, makes it lawful for a person who is a party to a wire, oral, or electronic communication to record that communication without the consent of other parties. This one-party consent framework applies to all types of phone calls, including landlines, cell phones, and VoIP services.
This guide explains every aspect of phone call recording in Wyoming, including what calls you can record, the criminal or tortious purpose exception, cross-state considerations, business call recording, VoIP and digital platforms, penalties for violations, and how recorded calls can be used as evidence.
One-Party Consent for Phone Calls in Wyoming
The Basic Rule
Under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702(b)(iv), it is lawful for a person to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where that person is a party to the communication. The Wyoming Supreme Court confirmed in Almada v. State, 994 P.2d 299 (Wyo. 1999) that one-party consent is a complete defense and rejected an argument that the state constitution requires a warrant or court order before participant monitoring (recording with one party's consent) can occur. For phone calls, this means:

- You can record any phone call you participate in
- You do not need to tell the other person you are recording
- You do not need a court order or warrant to record your own calls
- Your participation in the call satisfies the consent requirement
This rule applies whether you initiated the call or received it. The statute does not distinguish between the caller and the person answering.
Types of Phone Calls Covered
Wyoming's one-party consent rule applies to all forms of telephone communication:
| Call Type | Can You Record? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Landline to landline | Yes | Standard one-party consent applies |
| Cell phone calls | Yes | No additional restrictions |
| VoIP calls (Zoom, Teams, Skype) | Yes | Treated as wire or electronic communications |
| Video calls with audio | Yes | Audio portion follows phone recording rules |
| Conference calls | Yes | Your participation covers the entire call |
| Three-way calls | Yes | You must be a participant |
| Wi-Fi calling | Yes | Same rules as standard cell calls |
| Satellite phone calls | Yes | One-party consent applies |
Recording Calls You Are Not Part Of
Recording a phone call between two other people without the consent of at least one participant is generally a felony under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702. Prohibited conduct includes:
- Using a phone extension to secretly listen in and record
- Installing recording software on someone else's device
- Using a wiretap device on a phone line
- Having a third party record a call without any participant's knowledge
- Intercepting calls through electronic eavesdropping equipment
Wyoming's law has no general exception for spouses or family members. It does exclude ordinary business telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business from the definition of an intercepting device (Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-701(a)(viii)(A)), so an employer's routine monitoring of business calls on its own phone system can fall outside the statute, while secretly recording employees' personal calls generally does not. The Wyoming Supreme Court has expressly left open whether a parent may consent on behalf of a young child to recording the child's calls (Clark v. Alexander, 953 P.2d 145 (Wyo. 1998), where the trial court had accepted it). A few courts elsewhere have allowed it in narrow circumstances, but no Wyoming appellate court has adopted that rule, so a parent should not assume it is allowed.
The Criminal or Tortious Purpose Exception

What It Means for Phone Recording
Wyoming law contains an important limitation that applies even when you have one-party consent. Under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702, one-party consent does not authorize recording when the purpose is to commit a criminal or tortious act.
This means your intent matters. A phone recording that would otherwise be legal becomes unlawful if you made it for wrongful purposes:
- Recording a call to use for blackmail or extortion is illegal
- Recording a call to facilitate a fraud scheme is illegal
- Recording a call with the intent to harass or threaten is illegal
- Recording a call to document a business agreement is legal
- Recording a call to preserve evidence of threats against you is legal
- Recording a call for personal record-keeping is legal
How Courts Evaluate Intent
Wyoming courts have not set out a test for the "criminal or tortious purpose" limit. The statute asks only whether the communication was intercepted for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act, so what matters is why you recorded, which a court would judge from all the evidence.
Simply recording a contentious or heated phone call does not automatically indicate tortious purpose. The law targets recordings made as a tool for committing wrongful acts, not recordings of unpleasant conversations.
Cross-State Phone Call Recording

The Critical Montana Border Issue
Wyoming borders Montana, an all-party state: Montana makes it a crime to record a conversation with a hidden device without the knowledge of all parties, although a warning that the call is being recorded satisfies its law. This makes cross-state calls a significant concern for Wyoming residents. When you are in Wyoming recording a call with someone in Montana:
- Your recording is legal under Wyoming law
- The recording may violate Montana's wiretapping law
- Montana courts could potentially assert jurisdiction over you
Neighboring States Comparison
| State | Consent Requirement | Risk Level for WY Callers |
|---|---|---|
| Montana | All-party | HIGH |
| Colorado | One-party | Low (same standard) |
| Nebraska | One-party | Low (same standard) |
| South Dakota | One-party | Low (same standard) |
| Idaho | One-party | Low (same standard) |
| Utah | One-party | Low (same standard) |
Montana is the only Wyoming neighbor that requires all-party consent. All other bordering states follow one-party consent rules similar to Wyoming.
Which Law Applies?
Courts have not uniformly resolved which state's law governs when a phone call crosses state lines. Different approaches include:
- Applying the law of the state where the recording was made
- Applying the law of the state where the recorded party is located
- Weighing which state's interests would be more impaired if its law were not applied (the approach the California Supreme Court used in Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 2006)
- Applying the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the communication
The safest approach when calling someone in Montana is to announce at the start that you are recording, which satisfies Montana's warning exception. In other all-party consent states, notice alone may not be enough, so get every participant's consent before proceeding. Our recording consent checker shows the rules in each state.
Practical Tips for Cross-State Calls
If you regularly make calls between Wyoming and Montana, consider these strategies:
- Start the call with a brief statement: "I want to let you know I am recording this call"
- Under Montana law, once one person gives that warning, either party may record. If the other party does not want to be recorded, they can end the call
- Use written communication (email, text) for sensitive matters instead of phone calls
- Document the location of both parties when making important recorded calls
Business Phone Call Recording in Wyoming

Employer Recording of Business Calls
Wyoming businesses can record phone calls under the one-party consent framework. Common business purposes include:
- Quality assurance and customer service monitoring
- Compliance documentation for regulated industries
- Training new employees on call handling
- Resolving customer disputes with accurate records
- Protecting against fraudulent claims
While Wyoming law does not require businesses to notify callers about recording, many businesses choose to provide notice through automated messages such as "This call may be recorded for quality and training purposes." This practice provides additional legal protection, especially when callers may be located in all-party consent states.
Employee Recording of Business Calls
Employees in Wyoming can record their own business calls under one-party consent. This includes calls with customers, vendors, supervisors, HR representatives, and coworkers. However, employer policies may restrict recording in the workplace. Violating a company recording policy is not a criminal offense, but it can result in disciplinary action or termination.
Federal Regulations
In addition to state law, certain federal regulations may affect business call recording:
- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) says it has no rules on recording telephone conversations by individuals; its old beep-tone notice rule was removed in 2017. Federal recording law for calls is the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d), which follows one-party consent
- The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) imposes requirements on certain outbound business calls
- Industry-specific regulations such as FINRA rules for financial services firms may require call recording and retention
HIPAA Considerations
Healthcare providers and their business associates who record phone calls containing protected health information (PHI) must comply with HIPAA security requirements. Recorded calls containing PHI must be stored securely, access must be limited to authorized personnel, and retention and destruction policies must follow HIPAA guidelines.
VoIP and Digital Communication Recording
VoIP Calls
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls fall under Wyoming's communication interception statute as wire or electronic communications. The same one-party consent rule applies to:
- Zoom meetings and calls
- Microsoft Teams calls
- Google Meet sessions
- Skype conversations
- FaceTime audio and video calls
- WhatsApp and Signal voice calls
- Discord voice channels
Many VoIP platforms include built-in recording features. When you use the platform's recording function in a meeting or call you participate in, you are complying with Wyoming's one-party consent requirement. Some platforms automatically notify other participants when recording begins, providing additional transparency.
Voicemail
Recording someone leaving you a voicemail does not raise wiretapping concerns under Wyoming law. The caller is voluntarily transmitting a message to your phone system, and you are not intercepting a communication between two other parties.
Call Recording Apps
Smartphone applications that record phone calls are legal to use in Wyoming when you are a participant in the call. These apps work by recording directly on the device, creating a conference call with a recording server, or using accessibility features to capture audio. All methods are lawful under one-party consent as long as you are an active participant.
Text-Based Communications
While this guide focuses on phone calls, text messages, emails, and other written electronic communications are also covered by Wyoming's communication interception statute. Intercepting someone else's text messages or emails without authorization can violate the statute.
Using Phone Recordings as Evidence in Wyoming
Admissibility in Court
Phone recordings made legally under Wyoming's one-party consent law are generally admissible as evidence in both criminal and civil proceedings. Courts evaluate recordings based on:
- Authentication: Can you prove the recording is genuine and unaltered? Testimony from the person who made the recording, along with metadata and timestamps, helps establish authenticity.
- Relevance: Does the recording relate to a disputed issue in the case?
- Hearsay rules: Some recorded statements may be subject to hearsay objections, though many exceptions apply, including admissions by a party-opponent and statements against interest.
- Prejudicial vs. probative value: The court may exclude a recording if its potential to unfairly prejudice the jury substantially outweighs its evidentiary value.
Criminal Cases
Wyoming's wiretap act says the contents of an intercepted communication may not be admitted as evidence in any trial, hearing or other proceeding in Wyoming unless the interception complied with the act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-707(p)). Separately, under the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. 2515, the contents of an illegally intercepted call cannot be used as evidence in any state or federal proceeding, criminal or civil. Because Wyoming's rule tracks the federal one, a recording obtained in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702 will usually be excluded, and you may face separate criminal charges. Legally obtained one-party consent recordings can be admitted in Wyoming criminal cases, subject to the usual evidence rules.
Civil Cases
Wyoming civil courts can also admit legally obtained phone recordings, subject to the same rules. Common uses include contract disputes, employment cases, personal injury cases, and family law matters.
Family Court
Wyoming family courts can admit legally obtained phone recordings in custody, divorce, and domestic violence cases; the judge decides admissibility. Recordings of threatening or abusive phone calls can be particularly important in protective order proceedings.
Tips for Making Admissible Phone Recordings
To maximize the evidentiary value of a phone recording:
- Use a reliable recording device or app with clear audio quality
- Record the full conversation from beginning to end
- Do not edit, splice, or alter the recording
- Save the original file and create backup copies
- Note the date, time, participants, and phone numbers immediately after the call
- Store recordings securely and share them only with your attorney
Penalties for Illegal Phone Call Recording in Wyoming
Criminal Penalties
Illegally intercepting, disclosing, or using a phone call recording in Wyoming is generally a felony under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702.
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Illegal interception of phone call | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $1,000 fine, or both |
| Disclosing contents of illegally intercepted call | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $1,000 fine, or both |
| Using contents of illegally intercepted call | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $1,000 fine, or both |
| Intercepting the radio portion of a cellular, cordless, public land mobile radio or paging call | Misdemeanor | Up to 6 months imprisonment, up to $750 fine, or both |
Civil Liability
Under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-710, victims of illegal phone call interception can bring a civil lawsuit. Available remedies include:
- Actual damages or $1,000 per day of violation, whichever is greater
- Punitive damages
- Reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
The $1,000 per day minimum provides significant compensation for victims. Section 7-3-710(b) gives a complete defense only to someone who acted in good-faith reliance on a court order.
Federal Penalties
Illegal phone call interception may also violate the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. 2511. Federal penalties include up to 5 years in prison and civil damages.
Phone Recording in Specific Situations
Recording Calls with Your Landlord
You can record phone calls with your landlord in Wyoming without their knowledge. This is useful for documenting verbal promises about repairs, preserving evidence of harassment, recording discussions about security deposit returns, and keeping records of maintenance requests.
Recording Calls with Insurance Companies
Recording phone conversations with insurance adjusters and representatives is legal under one-party consent. This helps document claim discussions, settlement offers, coverage statements, and timelines.
Recording Calls with Government Agencies
You can record phone calls with state and federal government agencies when you are a participant. This includes calls with the Wyoming Department of Family Services, the Department of Transportation, Social Security Administration representatives, and IRS agents.
Recording Calls with Attorneys
While you can legally record phone conversations with your own attorney or opposing counsel under one-party consent, recording your own attorney may damage the attorney-client relationship, and recorded attorney-client communications may waive privilege if disclosed to third parties.
More Wyoming Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Wyoming Recording Laws
More Wyoming Recording Topics
More Wyoming Laws
- Wyoming AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Wyoming Dashcam Laws
- Wyoming Data Privacy Laws
- Wyoming Deepfake Laws
- Wyoming Employee Monitoring Laws
- Wyoming GPS Tracking Laws
- Wyoming Police Bodycam Laws
- Wyoming Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record a phone call in Wyoming without telling the other person?
Yes. Wyoming is a one-party consent state under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702. You can record any phone call you participate in without notifying the other party. Your participation in the call satisfies the consent requirement.
Is it legal to record a phone call from Wyoming to Montana?
The recording is legal under Wyoming law, but courts disagree about which state's law applies to an interstate call, and Montana prohibits recording a conversation with a hidden device without the knowledge of all parties. Under Montana law, a warning that the call is being recorded is enough, so the safest approach is to say so at the start of the call.
Can my employer record my work phone calls in Wyoming?
Yes. Under one-party consent, an employer can record business calls where a company representative is a participant. Employers can also monitor calls for quality assurance and training. Routine monitoring of business calls on the company's own phone system in the ordinary course of business can fall outside Wyoming's wiretap statute (Section 7-3-701(a)(viii)(A)), but that exclusion generally does not cover secretly recording employees' personal calls.
Can I use a phone recording as evidence in Wyoming court?
Yes, phone recordings made legally under one-party consent are generally admissible in Wyoming courts. The recording must be authenticated as genuine and relevant to the case. Illegally obtained recordings are typically excluded and may result in criminal charges against the recorder.
What happens if I illegally record someone's phone call in Wyoming?
Illegal phone call interception is generally a felony under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $1,000 fine (intercepting only the radio portion of a cellular, cordless, public land mobile radio or paging call is a misdemeanor, up to 6 months and $750). The victim can also sue civilly under Section 7-3-710 for the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per day of violation, plus punitive damages and attorney fees.
Updates
Clarified that a recording warning satisfies Montana but notice alone may not satisfy other all-party states, added public land mobile radio to the misdemeanor tier, and stopped stating that courts routinely admit phone recordings.
We corrected the Montana guidance (courts have not settled which state's law governs an interstate call, and a warning satisfies Montana law, so you need not stop if the other person objects), the employer and parent rules, the FCC's role, the good-faith defense and punitive damages under W.S. 7-3-710, the source of the evidence-exclusion rule, and removed an unsupported list of court factors. We corrected the evidence section to state that Wyoming's own wiretap act, Wyo. Stat. 7-3-707(p), bars unlawfully intercepted communications from evidence alongside the federal rule; noted that the Wyoming Supreme Court left open parental consent on a child's behalf in Clark v. Alexander (1998); and added the misdemeanor tier for intercepting the radio portion of a cellular, cordless or paging call.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of Almada v. State: the court rejected an argument that the Wyoming Constitution requires a warrant or court order for one-party-consent monitoring, not an all-party consent argument.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wyoming Statutes, Title 7 - Criminal Procedure - Chapter 3: Fugitives and Prevention of Crime - Article 7: Communication Interception
§ 7-3-702Prohibition against interception or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications; exceptions; penalties.In forcecited in 20 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no person shall intentionally: (i) Intercept, attempt to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire, oral or electronic communication; (ii) Use, attempt to use, or procure any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (A) Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable or other like connection used in wire communication; or (B) Such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2015
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Serna v. Bureau of Land Management Worland Field Office (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2015, 614 F. App'x 384)“…nic communications except under certain circumstances. See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-3-702(a). As relevant here, the statute cont…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wyoming Smart Glasses Recording Laws, Wyoming Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Wyoming Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Guide
§ 7-3-710Recovery of civil damages for violations; good faith defense.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) Subject to W.S. 7-3-702(b)(ii), any person whose wire, oral or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of this act may recover damages against any person who intercepts, discloses, uses or procures any other person to intercept, disclose or use the communications as follows: (i) Actual damages but not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) a day for each day of violation; (ii) Punitive damages; and (iii) Reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. (b) A good faith reliance on a court order constitutes a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Also relied on in: Wyoming Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Rules, Wyoming Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, Recordings as Evidence: US Court Rules by State
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 441 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-17 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Record My Boss Harassing Me? State-by-State Legal Guide (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?
Sources and References
- Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702 - Interception of Communications(law.justia.com)
- Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-710 - Civil Liability(law.justia.com)
- Almada v. State, 994 P.2d 299 (Wyo. 1999)(courtlistener.com)
- 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
- FCC - Recording Telephone Conversations(fcc.gov).gov
- HHS HIPAA Security Rule(hhs.gov).gov
- Wyoming Legislature - Title 7(wyoleg.gov).gov