Wyoming
Wyoming Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Guide
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wyoming is a one-party consent state for audio recording under Wyo. Stat. 7-3-702. Any participant in a conversation may record it without notifying the other parties. The law covers wire, oral, and electronic communications, but prohibits recording made for criminal or tortious purposes.
Wyoming's audio recording laws are governed by the Communication Interception statute found in Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702. This provision establishes a one-party consent framework that allows any participant in a conversation to record it without notifying the other parties. The rule applies to all forms of audio recording, whether capturing phone calls, in-person conversations, or digital communications.
This guide covers every aspect of audio recording law in Wyoming, including the scope of the one-party consent rule, what types of audio are protected, the criminal or tortious purpose exception, recording devices and technology, evidence rules, and the penalties for illegal interception.
Understanding Wyoming's One-Party Consent Rule for Audio
What the Statute Says
Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702 prohibits the intentional interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communication. The one-party consent exception sits at Section 7-3-702(b)(iv): a person who is a party to the communication, or who has received prior consent from one of the parties, may lawfully intercept that communication. The Wyoming Supreme Court endorsed this reading in Almada v. State, 994 P.2d 299 (Wyo. 1999), holding that one-party consent is a complete defense to the wiretapping statute and rejecting a state-constitutional challenge that would have required a warrant or court order before one-party-consent recording.

For audio recording purposes:
- If you are part of the conversation, you can record it
- If someone in the conversation gives you permission to record, you can record
- You do not need to inform all participants about the recording
- The consent of one party is sufficient legal authorization
What Counts as an "Oral Communication"
An "oral communication" under Wyoming law is a spoken communication uttered by a person who has a reasonable expectation that the communication is not being intercepted. This definition requires two elements:
- The speaker must subjectively believe the conversation is private
- That belief must be objectively reasonable given the circumstances
The law protects private conversations but does not cover statements made in public where anyone could overhear them. A quiet conversation in a closed office is protected. A statement shouted across a parking lot generally is not.
Wire Communications vs. Oral Communications
Wyoming law distinguishes between different types of audio communication:
| Type | Definition | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Wire communication | Aural transfer via wire, cable, or similar connection | Phone calls, VoIP calls, landline conversations |
| Oral communication | Spoken words with a reasonable expectation of privacy | Private in-person conversations, meetings behind closed doors |
| Electronic communication | Non-aural transfer of data | Text messages, emails, digital file transfers |
For audio recording, wire and oral communications are the primary categories. Both are subject to the one-party consent rule.
When Audio Recording Is Legal in Wyoming

Recording Your Own Conversations
You can legally make audio recordings of any conversation you participate in. This applies to:
- Phone calls you make or receive
- In-person conversations you are part of
- Meetings you attend
- Video calls and virtual meetings you participate in
- Group conversations where you are present
Your own consent as a participant satisfies the one-party requirement.
Recording with Third-Party Consent
You do not need to be a party to the conversation yourself if one of the participants has given you prior consent to record. For example, a police informant can consent to having officers record their conversation with a suspect, or an employee can consent to having a union representative record a meeting with management.
Recording in Public Spaces
Audio recording in public spaces where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy is generally unrestricted. Locations where audio recording is typically permitted without consent include:
- Public streets and sidewalks
- Parks and open public areas
- Retail stores and public business areas
- Government buildings open to the public
- Public transportation
- Outdoor events and gatherings
Recording Public Meetings
Wyoming's Public Meetings Act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 16-4-401 et seq.) requires most government meetings to be open to the public, but it does not mention recording. Recording an open meeting does not violate the wiretap law, because statements made at a public meeting are not private. The body can still remove people who willfully disrupt a meeting (Section 16-4-406), and executive sessions under Section 16-4-405 are closed to the public.
When Audio Recording Is Illegal in Wyoming

Recording Without Any Party's Consent
It is a felony to record a conversation when you are not a participant and no participant has consented. Common illegal scenarios include:
- Planting a hidden audio recorder in a room and leaving before a conversation takes place
- Using a listening device to capture conversations from another room
- Intercepting phone calls between two other people
- Installing recording software on someone else's device without their knowledge
- Using a baby monitor or similar device to eavesdrop on adult conversations
The Criminal or Tortious Purpose Exception
Even with one-party consent, recording is illegal if the purpose is to commit a criminal or tortious act:
Illegal purposes include:
- Recording for blackmail or extortion
- Recording to facilitate fraud
- Recording with intent to harass, stalk, or intimidate
- Recording to gain an unfair advantage in an illegal scheme
Legal purposes include:
- Documenting threats or harassment directed at you
- Preserving evidence of business agreements
- Recording workplace interactions for self-protection
- Keeping personal records of important conversations
- Gathering evidence of illegal activity to report to authorities
Recording in Areas with Privacy Expectations
If you are a party to the conversation, Wyoming's wiretap law does not turn on where it takes place. Placing a recorder in a bathroom, changing room, hotel room or someone else's bedroom to capture conversations you are not part of, without any participant's consent, is unlawful interception under Section 7-3-702. Capturing images in places like these can also be felony voyeurism under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 6-4-304.
Audio Recording Devices and Technology

Legal Recording Equipment
Wyoming law does not restrict the type of device used for audio recording. Any device capable of capturing audio is legal to use when one-party consent requirements are met:
- Smartphones and mobile devices
- Dedicated digital voice recorders
- AI-powered wearable recorders (such as the Plaud NotePin)
- Smart glasses with audio capture (such as Meta Ray-Bans)
- Smartwatches with recording capabilities
- Laptop and desktop computers with microphones
- Body-worn cameras with audio
Our recommended Digital Voice Recorder.
Wearable Recording Devices
Wearable recording devices are legal under Wyoming's one-party consent framework. If you are wearing a device that records audio and you are participating in the conversation, the recording is lawful. Employers may implement wearable recording device policies that restrict use on company premises. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees who record as part of protected concerted activity.
Hidden Audio Recorders
Hidden audio recorders are legal to use when you are a participant in the conversation being recorded. You can conceal a recording device on your person while participating in a conversation. However, you cannot hide a recorder to capture conversations you will not participate in or place recording devices in someone else's home, office, or vehicle without their knowledge.
Audio Recording as Evidence in Wyoming
Admissibility Standards
Audio recordings made in compliance with Wyoming's one-party consent law are generally admissible in court. The proponent must establish:
- Authentication: Evidence that the recording is what it purports to be
- Accuracy: The recording is a fair and accurate representation of the conversation
- Integrity: The recording has not been altered, edited, or tampered with
- Relevance: The recording relates to a matter at issue in the case
Chain of Custody
Maintaining a clear chain of custody strengthens admissibility. Best practices include preserving the original recording file in its native format, creating backup copies, documenting when the recording was made and by whom, and logging any transfers to attorneys or law enforcement.
Criminal vs. Civil Proceedings
- Criminal and civil cases: Wyoming's wiretap act says the contents of an intercepted wire, oral or electronic communication may not be admitted as evidence in any trial, hearing or other proceeding in Wyoming unless the interception complied with the act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-707(p)). The federal Wiretap Act separately bars them: under 18 U.S.C. 2515, the contents of a wire or oral communication intercepted in violation of federal wiretap law cannot be used as evidence in any state or federal court proceeding, civil or criminal. Because Wyoming's consent rule tracks the federal one, a recording that is illegal under Wyoming law will usually be illegal under federal law too, and the recorder may face felony charges.
- Counterclaims: The recorder may also face a civil suit under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-710.
- Family court: Wyoming family courts can admit legally obtained audio recordings, subject to the usual evidence rules, in custody, divorce, and protective order cases.
Penalties for Illegal Audio Recording in Wyoming
Criminal Penalties
Violating Wyoming's audio recording laws is generally a felony. Under Section 7-3-702(f), intercepting only the radio portion of a cellular, cordless, public land mobile radio or paging communication is a misdemeanor (up to 6 months and $750).
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Illegal interception of oral or wire communication | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $1,000 fine, or both |
| Disclosing illegally intercepted communications | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $1,000 fine, or both |
| Using illegally obtained communications | Felony | Up to 5 years imprisonment, up to $1,000 fine, or both |
Civil Damages
Under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-710, victims of illegal audio recording can pursue civil remedies:
- Actual damages or $1,000 per day of violation, whichever is greater
- Punitive damages
- Reasonable attorney fees and court costs
Federal Penalties
Illegal audio interception may also violate the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. 2511, with penalties including up to 5 years imprisonment and civil damages.
Special Audio Recording Situations
Recording Conversations with Minors
Wyoming law does not create a separate consent framework for conversations with minors. The standard one-party consent rule applies. If you are a participant in a conversation with a minor, you can record it. Parents present during conversations with their children can record those interactions. Recording your child's conversations with others when you are not present is different. The Wyoming Supreme Court has expressly left open whether a parent may consent on a young child's behalf to that kind of recording (Clark v. Alexander, 953 P.2d 145 (Wyo. 1998), where the trial court had accepted it). A few courts elsewhere have allowed it in narrow circumstances, but no Wyoming appellate court has adopted that rule, so do not assume it is allowed.
Recording in Vehicles
Audio recording inside your own vehicle is legal when you are present. This covers dashcam audio, phone calls while driving, and conversations with passengers. Your presence in the vehicle provides one-party consent.
Recording Therapy and Counseling Sessions
You can legally record your own therapy or counseling sessions under one-party consent. Therapists and counselors may have facility policies against recording, and violating a provider's policy could affect your treatment relationship.
Audio Surveillance vs. Audio Recording
There is an important distinction between audio recording (capturing a specific conversation you participate in) and audio surveillance (ongoing monitoring of a location). One-party consent authorizes recording when you are present. It does not authorize installing ongoing audio surveillance equipment to capture conversations in your absence.
More Wyoming Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Wyoming Recording Laws
More Wyoming Recording Topics
More Wyoming Laws
- Wyoming AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Wyoming Dashcam Laws
- Wyoming Data Privacy Laws
- Wyoming Deepfake Laws
- Wyoming Employee Monitoring Laws
- Wyoming GPS Tracking Laws
- Wyoming Police Bodycam Laws
- Wyoming Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I audio record a conversation in Wyoming without the other person knowing?
Yes. Wyoming is a one-party consent state under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702. You can record any conversation you participate in without informing or getting permission from other participants, as long as the recording is not for criminal or tortious purposes.
Is it legal to use a hidden audio recorder in Wyoming?
Yes, if you are a participant in the conversation being recorded. You can conceal a recording device on your person and record conversations you take part in. However, you cannot place hidden recorders to capture conversations you are not part of.
Can I record audio in a public place in Wyoming?
Yes. Audio recording in public places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy is generally unrestricted. This includes streets, parks, public buildings, and retail areas. Private conversations in secluded public areas may still carry some privacy expectation.
What devices can I use for audio recording in Wyoming?
Wyoming law does not restrict the type of recording device. You can use smartphones, dedicated voice recorders, AI wearable recorders, smart glasses, smartwatches, body cameras, or any other audio-capable device as long as you comply with the one-party consent requirement.
What are the penalties for illegal audio recording in Wyoming?
Illegal audio interception is generally a felony under Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $1,000 fine (intercepting only the radio portion of a cellular, cordless, public land mobile radio or paging communication is a misdemeanor). Civil liability under Section 7-3-710 includes the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per day of violation, plus punitive damages and attorney fees.
Updates
Noted that intercepting only the radio portion of cellular, cordless, public land mobile radio or paging calls is a misdemeanor rather than a felony, and stopped stating that family courts regularly admit recordings.
We corrected the evidence section (the exclusion of illegal recordings comes from federal law, 18 U.S.C. 2515, and applies the same way in civil and criminal cases), clarified that Wyoming's open-meetings law does not address recording, removed an invented condition on punitive damages, and noted that Wyoming has not decided whether a parent may consent for a child. We corrected the evidence section to state that Wyoming's own wiretap act, Wyo. Stat. 7-3-707(p), bars unlawfully intercepted communications from evidence alongside the federal rule; noted that the Wyoming Supreme Court left open parental consent on a child's behalf in Clark v. Alexander (1998); and corrected the privacy-areas paragraph, since a participant's audio recording does not depend on location.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of Almada v. State: the state-constitutional challenge the court rejected sought a warrant or court order requirement for one-party-consent recording, not an all-party consent rule.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wyoming Statutes, Title 7 - Criminal Procedure - Chapter 3: Fugitives and Prevention of Crime - Article 7: Communication Interception
§ 7-3-702Prohibition against interception or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications; exceptions; penalties.In forcecited in 20 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no person shall intentionally: (i) Intercept, attempt to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire, oral or electronic communication; (ii) Use, attempt to use, or procure any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (A) Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable or other like connection used in wire communication; or (B) Such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2015
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Serna v. Bureau of Land Management Worland Field Office (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2015, 614 F. App'x 384)“…nic communications except under certain circumstances. See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-3-702(a). As relevant here, the statute cont…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wyoming Smart Glasses Recording Laws, Wyoming Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Wyoming Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting, and Evidence Rules
§ 7-3-710Recovery of civil damages for violations; good faith defense.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) Subject to W.S. 7-3-702(b)(ii), any person whose wire, oral or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of this act may recover damages against any person who intercepts, discloses, uses or procures any other person to intercept, disclose or use the communications as follows: (i) Actual damages but not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) a day for each day of violation; (ii) Punitive damages; and (iii) Reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. (b) A good faith reliance on a court order constitutes a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Also relied on in: Wyoming Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Rules, Wyoming Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules and Consent Guide, Wyoming Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 441 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-17 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Record My Boss Harassing Me? State-by-State Legal Guide (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?
Sources and References
- Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702 - Interception of Communications(law.justia.com)
- Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-710 - Civil Liability(law.justia.com)
- Almada v. State, 994 P.2d 299 (Wyo. 1999)(courtlistener.com)
- Wyoming Legislature - Title 7(wyoleg.gov).gov
- Wyoming Public Meetings Act - Title 16(wyoleg.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
- NLRA - National Labor Relations Act(nlrb.gov).gov