EnglishEspañol
Michigan flag

Michigan

Michigan Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules for Landlines, Cell Phones, and VoIP (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 7, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Michigan Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules for Landlines, Cell Phones, and VoIP (2026)

Updates

Corrected a fabricated 2026 federal court ruling in AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas; the real case reached its participant-exception holding via a November 8, 2021 reconsideration order after an initial 2019 ruling the other way. Added a verified citation for Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney and corrected the federal civil-damages citation from 18 U.S.C. 2511 (the criminal provision) to 18 U.S.C. 2520 (the civil-remedy provision).

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539c (Eavesdropping)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  2. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539a (Definitions)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  3. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539e (Divulging Information)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  4. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539h (Civil Remedies)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  5. Fisher v. Perron, 30 F.4th 289 (6th Cir. 2022)(law.justia.com)
  6. 18 U.S.C. Section 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
  7. AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas, No. 4:17-cv-13292 (E.D. Mich., reconsideration order Nov. 8, 2021)(courtlistener.com).gov
  8. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 39 Cal. 4th 95 (2006)(courtlistener.com).gov
  9. 18 U.S.C. Section 2520 - Civil Action for Unauthorized Interception(law.cornell.edu).gov
Share: