Kansas
Kansas Voyeurism Laws
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kansas criminalizes voyeurism as a felony under its breach of privacy statute, K.S.A. 21-6101. A first conviction for secretly recording or viewing an adult's nude body or undergarments, where they reasonably expect privacy, is a severity level 8 person felony with a guideline range of 7 to 23 months and presumptive probation for most first offenders. Since July 1, 2026, the penalty is much higher when the victim is a minor.
Kansas treats voyeurism as a serious felony offense under its breach of privacy statute. Unlike many states that classify voyeurism as a misdemeanor, Kansas imposes felony-level penalties from the first offense. The primary law governing voyeurism is K.S.A. 21-6101, which covers hidden camera recording, upskirting, nonconsensual intimate image sharing, and AI-generated deepfakes.
This guide explains what constitutes voyeurism under Kansas law, the criminal penalties and sentencing guidelines, sex offender registration requirements, civil remedies for victims, and how the 2025 legislative update expanded protections against AI-generated intimate content.
What Constitutes Voyeurism in Kansas
K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6): The Core Voyeurism Provision
Under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6), as amended effective July 1, 2026 by HB 2479, it is a crime to intentionally and without lawful authority use any device or software to record or view another identifiable person's nude body or undergarments, without that person's consent or knowledge, with intent to invade their privacy, under circumstances in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. In practice, this covers two main situations:
Under clothing. Capturing images of what another person's clothing covers, commonly known as "upskirting" and "downblousing." The statute has no private-place requirement, so this can apply in a public place, but the person must have had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Nude or undressed in a private setting. Secretly recording someone who is nude or in their undergarments when they are in a location where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy and have not consented to being recorded. This covers hidden cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, bedrooms, hotel rooms, and similar private spaces.
Key Elements the Prosecution Must Prove
To secure a conviction under subsection (a)(6), the state must prove:
- Intent. The defendant acted intentionally (the standard since July 1, 2026; before that it was "knowingly"). An accidental or incidental capture of an image does not meet this element.
- Lack of lawful authority. The defendant had no legal right to record in the manner they did. Since 2026, acting with intent to arouse or satisfy sexual desires is expressly not "lawful authority."
- Use of a device or software. The defendant used any device or software to record or view the person.
- Nude body or undergarments. What was recorded or viewed was the person's nude body or the undergarments they were wearing.
- No consent or knowledge. The person did not consent and did not know.
- Intent to invade privacy. The defendant intended to invade the person's privacy.
- Reasonable expectation of privacy. The person had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances.
How Kansas Defines "Private Place"
K.S.A. 21-6101 (subsection (g)(4) since July 1, 2026) defines a "private place" as a place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from uninvited intrusion or surveillance.
Locations that qualify as private places under this definition:
- Private residences and apartments
- Hotel and motel rooms
- Bathrooms and restrooms (including public restrooms)
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Dressing rooms in retail stores
- Hospital rooms and medical examination rooms
- Private offices when the door is closed
Locations generally not considered private:
- Public streets, sidewalks, and parks
- Retail stores open to the public
- Restaurant dining areas
- Common areas of office buildings
Dissemination of Voyeuristic Images

K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(7): Sharing Voyeuristic Content
Subsection (a)(7) creates a separate and more serious offense for distributing images obtained through voyeurism. It is illegal to intentionally disseminate or permit the dissemination of any image, video, or other recording obtained in violation of subsection (a)(6).
This covers:
- Sharing voyeuristic images via text message, email, or social media
- Posting voyeuristic content on websites or forums
- Selling or distributing voyeuristic content
- Showing voyeuristic images or video to other people
- Uploading content to cloud storage accessible by others
The dissemination offense is classified more severely than the voyeurism offense itself, reflecting the additional harm caused by spreading intimate images beyond the initial violation. If the offender is 18 or older and the victim is under 14, dissemination is an off-grid person felony.
Nonconsensual Intimate Images (Revenge Porn)

K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8): Image-Based Sexual Abuse
Kansas also criminalizes the dissemination of intimate images of an identifiable person without their consent, when done with intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate. This provision covers what is commonly called "revenge porn" and applies regardless of how the images were originally obtained.
Key elements of subsection (a)(8):
- The images must depict an identifiable person 18 or older who is nude or engaged in sexual activity
- Dissemination must be without the consent of the person depicted
- The defendant must have acted with intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate
- The person must have had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances
- It does not matter if the images were originally taken consensually
2025 Update: AI Deepfakes Covered Under SB 186
In 2025, Governor Laura Kelly signed Senate Bill 186 into law, expanding K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) to cover images "created, in whole or in part, altered or modified by artificial intelligence or any digital means."
This means that, when the other (a)(8) elements are met (an identifiable adult, no consent, and intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate), sharing any of the following is covered:
- AI-generated deepfake pornography depicting an identifiable person
- Digitally altered images that make someone appear nude or engaged in sexual activity
- Face-swapped content using someone's likeness without consent
- Any computer-generated intimate imagery targeting an identifiable person
The law applies regardless of whether the identifiable person was involved in creating the original source material. Sharing a completely fabricated AI image that realistically depicts someone in an intimate situation is now treated the same as sharing real intimate images without consent.
Public Interest Exception
Subsection (a)(8) includes an exception for materials used for bona fide scientific, educational, governmental, news reporting, or similar public purpose activities. This protects legitimate journalism, academic research, and law enforcement investigations from criminal liability.
Criminal Penalties

Sentencing Guidelines
Kansas uses a structured sentencing grid for felonies. The severity level of the offense and the offender's criminal history score determine the presumptive sentence. The following table summarizes the penalties for voyeurism-related offenses:

| Offense | Subsection | Severity Level | Presumptive Sentence Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voyeurism (first offense, adult victim) | (a)(6) | Level 8 person felony | 7-23 months (presumptive probation unless 2+ prior person felonies) |
| Voyeurism (second offense within 5 years) | (a)(6) | Level 5 person felony | 31-136 months prison |
| Voyeurism, victim 14 to 17 | (a)(6) | Level 5 person felony | 31-136 months prison |
| Voyeurism, offender 18 or older and victim under 14 | (a)(6) | Off-grid person felony | Sentenced outside the grid |
| Disseminating voyeuristic images (any offense) | (a)(7) | Level 5 person felony (off-grid if adult offender and victim under 14) | 31-136 months prison |
| Nonconsensual intimate images/AI deepfakes (first offense) | (a)(8) | Level 8 person felony | 7-23 months (presumptive probation unless 2+ prior person felonies) |
| Nonconsensual intimate images/AI deepfakes (second offense within 5 years) | (a)(8) | Level 5 person felony | 31-136 months prison |
Understanding Kansas Sentencing Grids
Kansas sentencing guidelines use a grid system established under K.S.A. 21-6804. The vertical axis lists the severity level of the offense (1 being the most serious, 10 the least). The horizontal axis reflects the offender's criminal history score (A being the most extensive, three or more prior person felonies, and I the least, one misdemeanor or no record). Where these two values intersect on the grid determines the presumptive sentence range.
For a severity level 8 person felony, the range runs from 7 to 9 months for someone with no record (category I) to 19 to 23 months for someone with three or more prior person felonies (category A). The judge has discretion to depart from the presumptive sentence under certain circumstances.
Probation vs. Prison
For most offenders convicted of a severity level 8 person felony, the presumptive sentence is probation. On the Kansas grid, prison is presumptive at level 8 only for someone with two or more prior person felonies (categories A and B).
For severity level 5 person felonies (dissemination, repeat offenses, or an (a)(6) offense against a victim aged 14 to 17), prison time is the presumptive sentence. An off-grid offense, an adult recording or sharing images of a child under 14, is sentenced outside the grid entirely.
Sex Offender Registration
Kansas Offender Registration Act
Voyeurism convictions under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6) require registration under the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA). Offenders convicted of voyeurism must register as sex offenders with local law enforcement, and K.S.A. 22-4906 sets the length of that obligation.
Registration Requirements
Registered sex offenders in Kansas must:
- Provide their name, address, date of birth, and photograph to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI)
- Report to local law enforcement within three business days of establishing residence
- Update registration when changing address, employment, or school enrollment
- Register for 15 years under K.S.A. 22-4906 after a first conviction under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6), (a)(7), or (a)(8), counted from release if the person was confined or from conviction if not; a second or subsequent conviction for any offense requiring registration makes registration lifelong under K.S.A. 22-4906(c)
- Report in person four times a year under K.S.A. 22-4905: once during the offender's birth month and every third, sixth, and ninth month around it
Consequences of Registration
Being placed on the Kansas sex offender registry has lasting consequences beyond the criminal sentence itself:
- Public notification through the KBI's online offender registry
- Limitations on employment opportunities
- In-person notice to the registering law enforcement agency and written notice to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation 21 days before any travel outside the United States, with an itinerary, or within three business days of making travel arrangements in an emergency, under K.S.A. 22-4905(p)
- Social stigma affecting personal relationships
Failure to comply with registration requirements is a separate criminal offense under K.S.A. 22-4903.
Civil Remedies for Voyeurism Victims
K.S.A. 22-2518: Civil Damages
Victims of voyeurism may be able to pursue civil damages under K.S.A. 22-2518, which provides:
- Actual damages with a statutory minimum of $100 per day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater
- Punitive damages at the court's discretion
- Reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
That statute's civil action is limited by its own text to a wire, oral or electronic communication intercepted in violation of Kansas's separate interception-authorization scheme at K.S.A. 22-2514 et seq. K.S.A. 21-6101 does not cross-reference it, so it does not clearly extend to the camera-placement and image-dissemination voyeurism offenses under (a)(6), (a)(7), and (a)(8). A common-law claim for invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion), covered next, is the more clearly available civil remedy for a hidden-camera or image-based voyeurism case.
Additional Civil Claims
Voyeurism victims in Kansas may also pursue claims under common law theories:
- Invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion). A person who intentionally intrudes upon the solitude or private affairs of another in a manner highly offensive to a reasonable person may be liable for damages.
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress. When voyeuristic conduct is so outrageous that it goes beyond all bounds of decency, the victim may recover for severe emotional distress.
- Negligent infliction of emotional distress. In some cases, a negligence-based claim may be available.
- Protective orders. Depending on the facts, a victim may be able to seek a court protective order, as explained below.
Protection From Abuse Orders
A protection from abuse order under K.S.A. 60-3104 requires "abuse" as the Kansas Protection from Abuse Act defines it in K.S.A. 60-3102: causing or attempting to cause bodily injury, placing someone in fear of imminent bodily injury by physical threat, or unwanted sexual contact, between intimate partners or household members. Voyeuristic recording alone is not on that list, though conduct that comes with it may be. A lawyer or advocate can help you identify which kind of protective order fits your situation.
Law Enforcement Investigation of Voyeurism
How Cases Are Investigated
Kansas law enforcement agencies investigate voyeurism cases using a range of tools:
- Digital forensics. Examining phones, computers, cameras, and cloud storage for voyeuristic content
- Search warrants. Obtaining warrants to seize electronic devices and search digital accounts
- Network analysis. Tracing the distribution of images through social media, messaging apps, and websites
- Victim interviews. Gathering testimony about the circumstances of the recording and its discovery
Reporting Voyeurism
If you are a victim of voyeurism in Kansas, you can report it to:
- Local police department or county sheriff's office
- The Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) for cases involving online distribution
- The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) if the victim is a minor
- School administrators if the incident occurred on school property
Evidence Preservation
Victims should take steps to preserve evidence:
- Do not delete messages, images, or communications related to the offense
- Take screenshots of any distributed content with timestamps and URLs
- Document the timeline of events, including when you discovered the recording
- Preserve the recording device if accessible (do not attempt to access it yourself if it belongs to the suspect)
Federal Laws That May Apply
Federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act
The federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 1801) prohibits capturing images of a person's private areas without consent, but only within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, which can include some federal enclaves depending on how the land is held. It does not cover federal property generally, and most voyeurism in Kansas is prosecuted under state law.
Child Exploitation Laws
When voyeurism involves minors, federal child exploitation laws under 18 U.S.C. 2251-2260 may apply in addition to state charges. Production, distribution, and possession of child sexual abuse material carry severe federal penalties of 15 to 30 years in prison for production offenses.
TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025)
Congress enacted the TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. 119-12), signed May 19, 2025, with platform notice-and-takedown obligations effective May 19, 2026. The Act requires online platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, including AI-generated deepfakes, within 48 hours of a victim's takedown request. The Act also makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish nonconsensual intimate images, including AI-generated forgeries. It does not create a right to sue; a separate federal law, 15 U.S.C. 6851, lets a person sue over the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. These federal laws work alongside K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) (as amended by SB 186).
Common Voyeurism Scenarios in Kansas
Hidden Cameras in Rental Properties
Landlords and property owners who install hidden cameras in rental units to record or view tenants undressed in private spaces (bathrooms, bedrooms) commit voyeurism under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6). Tenants who discover hidden cameras should contact law enforcement immediately and preserve the evidence.
Upskirting in Public Places
Photographing or recording under a person's clothing without consent, capturing what the clothing covers with intent to invade the person's privacy, can be voyeurism under subsection (a)(6) in a public place as well as a private one. The statute does not require a "private place," but the person must have had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Locker Room and Gym Recording
Secretly recording or viewing people's nude bodies or undergarments in locker rooms, showers, and changing areas at gyms, pools, and fitness facilities, with intent to invade their privacy, can violate subsection (a)(6), because people there have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Sharing Ex-Partner Intimate Images
Sharing intimate images of a former partner without consent, with intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate, violates K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8). This applies whether the images were originally taken consensually during the relationship or not.
AI-Generated Deepfake Intimate Content
Sharing AI-generated or digitally altered nude or sexual images of an identifiable adult without their consent, with intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate, violates K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) as amended by SB 186 (2025). That includes deepfake videos and face-swapped content. Creating such an image without sharing it is not covered by (a)(8).
Federal law adds a separate layer. The TAKE IT DOWN Act makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish an intimate AI-generated forgery of an identifiable adult without consent when, among other conditions, the publication is intended to cause harm or causes harm.
More Kansas Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
More Kansas Recording Topics
More Kansas Laws
- Kansas AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Kansas Dashcam Laws
- Kansas Data Privacy Laws
- Kansas Deepfake Laws
- Kansas Employee Monitoring Laws
- Kansas GPS Tracking Laws
- Kansas Police Bodycam Laws
- Kansas Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for voyeurism in Kansas?
A first voyeurism offense under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6) against an adult is a severity level 8 person felony with a guideline range of 7 to 23 months depending on criminal history; probation is the presumptive sentence unless the offender has two or more prior person felonies. A second conviction within five years, or an offense against a victim aged 14 to 17, is a severity level 5 person felony carrying 31 to 136 months, and an adult who records a child under 14 commits an off-grid person felony. Disseminating voyeuristic images is a severity level 5 person felony even on a first offense.
Do you have to register as a sex offender for voyeurism in Kansas?
Yes. Voyeurism convictions under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6), (a)(7), or (a)(8) require registration under the Kansas Offender Registration Act. K.S.A. 22-4906 sets a 15-year registration period for a first conviction and lifetime registration after a second or subsequent conviction for any offense requiring registration, with in-person reporting to local law enforcement four times a year under K.S.A. 22-4905.
Is upskirting illegal in Kansas?
Yes. K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6), as amended in 2026, criminalizes intentionally using any device or software to record or view another person's nude body or undergarments without their consent or knowledge, with intent to invade their privacy, where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. It has no private-place requirement, so it can apply in public. A first offense against an adult is a severity level 8 person felony; it is a severity level 5 person felony if the victim is 14 to 17.
Is sharing AI-generated deepfake pornography illegal in Kansas?
Yes. In 2025, Kansas passed Senate Bill 186, which amended K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) to criminalize dissemination of AI-generated or digitally altered intimate images depicting an identifiable adult without their consent, when shared with intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate. A first offense is a severity level 8 person felony with a guideline range of 7 to 23 months and presumptive probation for most first offenders.
Can I sue someone for voyeurism in Kansas?
Possibly. K.S.A. 22-2518 provides actual damages with a statutory minimum of $1,000, punitive damages, and attorney fees, but that statute is written for wire, oral, or electronic communication interception and may not clearly cover camera-placement voyeurism. The more clearly available civil remedy is a common law claim for invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion) or intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Updates
Completed the international-travel reporting duty for registered offenders: written KBI notice, an itinerary, and a three-business-day window for emergency travel.
We corrected the registration section (a second registrable conviction means lifetime registration), the sentencing explanation (level 8 is presumptive probation for most first offenders, and the criminal-history axis was reversed), the scope of the federal video voyeurism law and protection-from-abuse orders, and updated the voyeurism elements and penalties to the 2026 amendment to K.S.A. 21-6101. We corrected the AI deepfake section to say Kansas law covers sharing, not creating, such images, and only of an adult with intent to harass, threaten or intimidate; added the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act crime and the 15 U.S.C. 6851 civil claim; tightened the locker-room example to the statute's elements; and replaced an unsourced residency-restriction claim with the actual KORA international-travel notice duty.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the sex offender registration period for Kansas voyeurism convictions from a claimed 15/25-year split to the statute's actual flat 15-year term (K.S.A. 22-4906), fixed the reporting-frequency citation, and added a caveat that the K.S.A. 22-2518 civil damages statute is written for communication interception and may not clearly cover camera-placement voyeurism.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed a fabricated public-access exclusion from the K.S.A. 21-6101(f) "private place" definition; the statute's actual text is a single sentence with no such carve-out.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Confirmed SB 186 (L. 2025 ch. 120 sec. 3) coverage of AI deepfakes under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8). Added [TAKE IT DOWN Act](/us-laws/take-it-down-act) (Pub. L. 119-12, signed May 19, 2025; platform notice-and-takedown effective May 19, 2026) as a federal overlay for nonconsensual intimate image takedowns from online platforms. K.S.A. 22-4906 KORA sex offender registration requirement confirmed. Added UpdatesLog.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 21: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
§ 21-6101Breach of privacy.In forcecited in 27 of our articles
(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; (2) divulging, without the consent of the sender or receiver, the existence or contents of such message if such person knows that the message was illegally intercepted, or if such person illegally learned of the message in the course of employment with an agency in transmitting such message; (3) entering with intent to listen surreptitiously to private conversations in a private place or to observe the personal conduct of any other person or persons entitled to privacy therein; (4) installing or using outside or inside a private place any device for hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds originating in such place, which sounds would not ordinarily be audible or comprehensible without the use of such device, without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein; (5) installing or using any device or equipment for the interception of any telephone, telegraph or other wire or wireless communication without the consent of the person in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Recent Kansas decisions construe the image-dissemination subsection, K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8), not the interception subsections. State v. Ivy (2025) held a reasonable expectation of privacy under that subsection has a subjective and an objective component. State v. Jamil (2026), unpublished, found disseminating needs no jury definition.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ivy (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2025)✓Ivy posted on Snapchat a sexual video his ex-girlfriend had recorded and texted him during their relationship; the court applied a subjective and objective two-part test and held a jury could find she kept a reasonable expectation of privacy, affirming the conviction.
- In re Belcher (Supreme Court of Kansas 2024, 552 P.3d 1213)“…deotape, photograph, film or image obtained in violation of K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6) or (a)(8), and amendments…”
- State v. Jamil (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2026)✓Jamil secretly filmed a woman undressed and unconscious at his home, then sent the videos to her boyfriend; the court held that sharing with a single recipient can be disseminating under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) and that intent to harass could be inferred from his conduct.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Smart Glasses Recording Laws (K.S.A. 21-6101), US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, Kansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 21-6804Sentencing grid for nondrug crimes; authority and responsibility of sentencing court; presumptive disposition.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) The provisions of this section shall be applicable to the sentencing guidelines grid for nondrug crimes. The following sentencing guidelines grid shall be applicable to nondrug felony crimes: (b) Sentences expressed in the sentencing guidelines grid for nondrug crimes represent months of imprisonment. (c) The sentencing guidelines grid is a two-dimensional crime severity and criminal history classification tool. The grid's vertical axis is the crime severity scale which classifies current crimes of conviction. The grid's horizontal axis is the criminal history scale which classifies criminal histories. (d) The sentencing guidelines grid for nondrug crimes as provided in this section defines presumptive punishments for felony convictions, subject to the sentencing court's discretion to enter a departure sentence. The appropriate punishment for a felony conviction should depend on the severity of the crime of conviction when compared to all other crimes and the offender's criminal history. (e) (1) The sentencing court has discretion to sentence at any place within the sentencing range.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 70 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lamia-Beck (Supreme Court of Kansas 2024, 549 P.3d 1103)“…grid block for an offender classified in that grid block;" K.S.A. 21-6804(a), which holds Lamia-Beck's grid block…”
- State v. Smith (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2024)“…ts to the components of a "complete sentence" identified in K.S.A. 21-6804(e)(2): "the complete sentence . . . sha…”
- State v. Fleming (Supreme Court of Kansas 2018, 423 P.3d 506)“…rity level 3 person felony, in violation of K.S.A. 21-5420, K.S.A. 21-6804 and K.S.A. 21-6807 (aggravated r…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Kansas Security Camera Laws, Kansas Workplace Recording Laws
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 22: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 22-2514Authorized interception of wire, oral or electronic communications; definitions.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
This act shall be a part of and supplemental to the code of criminal procedure. As used in this act: (1) "Wire communication" means any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception, including the use of such connection in a switching station, furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing or operating such facilities for the transmission of intrastate, interstate or foreign communications.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Farha (Supreme Court of Kansas 1975, 218 Kan. 394)“…ne obtained in Sedgwick county pursuant to our present law (K. S. A. 22-2514 to 22-2519 [Weeks 1974]). 1. Shawnee…”
- State v. Roudybush (Supreme Court of Kansas 1984, 235 Kan. 834)“…nlawful and in violation of K.S.A. 21-4001 and K.S.A. 22-2514 et seq., “in that no warra…”
- State v. Brooks (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2011, 46 Kan. App. 2d 601)“…nition. Brooks notes a broad definition of "intercept" in K.S.A. 22-2514(3) but says it does not apply. The Stat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws, Kansas AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
§ 22-2518Same; civil action for damages; defense available in civil and criminal actions.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
(1) Any person whose wire, oral or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of this act shall have a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose or use, such communications, and shall be entitled to recover from any such person: (a) Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater; (b) punitive damages; and (c) reasonable attorneys' fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. (2) A good faith reliance by any person on a court order authorizing the interception of any wire, oral or electronic communication shall constitute a complete defense in any civil or criminal action brought against such person based upon such interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gibson (Supreme Court of Kansas 1994, 255 Kan. 474)“…f unlawfully intercepted *481 wire or oral communications. K.S.A. 22-2518 establishes a civil cause of action for…”
- Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. (District Court, D. Kansas 1997, 985 F. Supp. 1308)“…18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., and the Kansas Wiretap Act, K.S.A. 22-2518, and invaded their privacy by intercept…”
- Banks v. Opat (District Court, D. Kansas 2021)“…ete defense against any civil action. 18 U.S.C. § 2520(d); K.S.A. § 22-2518(2). “To be in good faith, the officers’…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Audio Recording Laws, Kansas Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), Kansas Phone Call Recording Laws
§ 22-4902Definitions.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
As used in the Kansas offender registration act, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "Offender" means: (1) A sex offender; (2) a violent offender; (3) a drug offender; (4) any person who has been required to register under out-of-state law or is otherwise required to be registered; and (5) any person required by court order to register for an offense not otherwise required as provided in the Kansas offender registration act. (b) "Sex offender" includes any person who: (1) On or after April 14, 1994, is convicted of any sexually violent crime; (2) on or after July 1, 2002, is adjudicated as a juvenile offender for an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the commission of a sexually violent crime, unless the court, on the record, finds that the act involved non-forcible sexual conduct, the victim was at least 14 years of age and the offender was not more than four years older than the victim; (3) has been determined to be a sexually violent predator; (4) on or after July 1, 1997, is convicted of any of the following crimes when one of the parties involved is less than 18 years of age: (A) Adultery, as defined in K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 83 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Thomas (Supreme Court of Kansas 2018, 307 Kan. 733)“…cation for an offense requiring registration as provided in K.S.A. 22-4902, and amendments thereto, the court sha…”
- State v. Myers (Supreme Court of Kansas 1996, 260 Kan. 669)“…July 1, 1993. Aggravated sexual battery is a named offense. K.S.A. 22-4902(a), (b)(9), and K.S.A. 22-4910. We note…”
- State v. Coman (Supreme Court of Kansas 2012, 294 Kan. 84)“…ommit sexually violent crimes. KORA’s definition provision, K.S.A. 22-4902, includes a list of crimes that are per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Age of Consent Laws: Statutes, Penalties and Reporting, Kansas Child Custody Laws (2026): Types, Best Interests, and Your Rights, Kansas Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
§ 22-4903Violation of act; aggravated violation; penalties; new and separate offense; prosecution, venue.In force
(a) Violation of the Kansas offender registration act is the failure by an offender, as defined in K.S.A. 22-4902, and amendments thereto, to comply with any and all provisions of such act, including any and all duties set forth in K.S.A. 22-4905 through 22-4907, and amendments thereto. Any violation of the Kansas offender registration act which continues for more than 30 consecutive days shall, upon the 31st consecutive day, constitute a new and separate offense, and shall continue to constitute a new and separate offense every 30 days thereafter for as long as the violation continues. (b) Aggravated violation of the Kansas offender registration act is violation of the Kansas offender registration act which continues for more than 180 consecutive days.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In re C.P.W. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2009, 289 Kan. 448)“…istration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq. We hold that K.S.A. 22-4903, which subjects to criminal liability “…”
- State v. LeClair (Supreme Court of Kansas 2012, 295 Kan. 909)“…ing to register as an offender as required by the KORA. See K.S.A. 22-4903. Count 1 charged that he failed to info…”
- In Re CPW (Supreme Court of Kansas 2009, 213 P.3d 413)“…istration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq. We hold that K.S.A. 22-4903, which subjects to criminal liability "…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 22-4905Duties of offender required to register; reporting; updated photograph; fee; driver's license; identification card.In force
Any offender required to register as provided in the Kansas offender registration act shall: (a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, register in person with the registering law enforcement agency within three business days of coming into any county or location of jurisdiction in which the offender resides or intends to reside, maintains employment or intends to maintain employment, or attends school or intends to attend school. Any such offender who cannot physically register in person with the registering law enforcement agency for such reasons including, but not limited to, incapacitation or hospitalization, as determined by a person licensed to practice medicine or surgery, or involuntarily committed pursuant to the Kansas sexually violent predator act, shall be subject to verification requirements other than in-person registration, as determined by the registering law enforcement agency having jurisdiction; (b) except as provided further, for any: (1) Sex offender, including a violent offender or drug offender who is also a sex offender, report in person four times each year to the registering law enforcement agency in the county or location of jurisdiction in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Thomas (Supreme Court of Kansas 2018, 307 Kan. 733)“…ecord, of the procedure to register and the requirements of K.S.A. 22-4905 . . .". Prior to July 1, 2012, courts w…”
- State v. Ballard (Supreme Court of Kansas 2025, 566 P.3d 1092)“…SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 22-4905(f), a provision of the Kansas Offender…”
- State v. Sayler (Supreme Court of Kansas 2017)“…provisions of [KORA], including all duties set forth in K.S.A. 22-4905 throught [sic]…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 22-4906Duration and termination of registration requirement.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) (1) Except as provided in subsection (c), if convicted of any of the following offenses, an offender's duration of registration shall be, if confined, 15 years after the date of parole, discharge or release, whichever date is most recent, or, if not confined, 15 years from the date of conviction: (A) Sexual battery, as defined in K.S.A. 21-3517, prior to its repeal, or K.S.A. 21-5505(a), and amendments thereto; (B) adultery, as defined in K.S.A. 21-3507, prior to its repeal, or K.S.A. 21-5511, and amendments thereto, when one of the parties involved is less than 18 years of age; (C) promoting the sale of sexual relations, as defined in K.S.A. 21-6420, and amendments thereto; (D) patronizing a prostitute, as defined in K.S.A. 21-3515, prior to its repeal, or K.S.A. 21-6421, prior to its amendment by section 18 of chapter 120 of the 2013 Session Laws of Kansas on July 1, 2013, when one of the parties involved is less than 18 years of age; (E) lewd and lascivious behavior, as defined in K.S.A. 21-3508, prior to its repeal, or K.S.A. 21-5513, and amendments thereto, when one of the parties involved is less than 18 years of age; (F) capital murder, as defined in K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 28 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Myers (Supreme Court of Kansas 1996, 260 Kan. 669)“…on. The registration requirements of KSORA (K.S.A. 22-4904, K.S.A. 22-4906, and K.S.A. 22-4907) are remedial and t…”
- State v. Fredrick (Supreme Court of Kansas 2011, 292 Kan. 169)“…h that Fredrick was required to register in Kansas, because K.S.A. 22-4906(i) did not apply to the defendant. The…”
- State v. Denmark-Wagner (Supreme Court of Kansas 2011, 292 Kan. 870)“…has merit. At the most, under K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 22-4902 and K.S.A. 22-4906, he was eligible for a 10-year registra…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Court Records: How to Search the District Court Public Access Portal
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 60: PROCEDURE, CIVIL
§ 60-3104Commencement of proceedings; persons seeking relief on behalf of minor child; forms; no docket fee; confidentiality of certain matters, exceptions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) An intimate partner or household member may seek relief under the protection from abuse act by filing a verified petition with any judge of the district court or with the clerk of the court alleging abuse by another intimate partner or household member. (b) The following persons may seek relief under the protection from abuse act on behalf of a minor child by filing a verified petition with any judge of the district court or with the clerk of the court alleging abuse by another intimate partner or household member: (1) A parent of the minor child; (2) an adult residing with the minor child; or (3) the child's court-appointed legal custodian or court-appointed legal guardian. (c) The clerk of the court shall supply the forms for the petition and orders, which shall be prescribed by the judicial council. (d) Service of process served under this section shall be by personal service and not by certified mail return receipt requested. No docket fee shall be required for proceedings under the protection from abuse act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Paida v. Leach (Supreme Court of Kansas 1996, 260 Kan. 292)“…hich alleges abuse by a person with whom the child resides. K.S.A. 60-3104(a). Abuse is defined in part as…”
- Barnett v. Barnett (Court of Appeals of Kansas 1997, 24 Kan. App. 2d 342)“…250 Kan. 123, 129 , 823 P.2d 782 (1991). K.S.A. 60-3104 of the Protection from Abuse Act, K.S.A…”
- Crim v. Crim (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2008, 40 Kan. App. 2d 367)“…ging abuse by another intimate partner or household member. K.S.A. 60-3104(a). In part, abuse is defined as…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
United States Code Title 18
§ 1801Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 81 of our articles
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. In this section— the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast; the term “broadcast” means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons; the term “a private area of the individual” means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; the term “female breast” means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; and the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means— circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or circumstances in which a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied 18 U.S.C. 1801 mainly at its edges. United States v. Johnson (2010) read it as Congress's answer to secretly filming nudity on federal property, acquitting on a child exploitation charge instead. EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security (2011) applied the Section 1801(c) law enforcement exception to a TSA scanner claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Helton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 944 F.3d 198)“…from this list of federal offenses is video voyeurism under 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Rather than list this statute as an enu…”
- United States v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2010, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1059)✓A weightlifting coach hid a camera to film minors weighing in nude; acquitting him under the child exploitation statute, the court called that conduct plain video voyeurism under section 1801, but noted the section reaches only federal maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 653 F.3d 1)✓Privacy groups challenged TSA body scanners under the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act; the D.C. Circuit held the statute's exception for lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity applied to airport screening, so the section 1801 claim failed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), California Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026)
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 21-6101 - Breach of Privacy (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.org).gov
- K.S.A. 22-2518 - Civil Action for Damages (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 22-4906 - Registration Duration, Kansas Offender Registration Act (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 21-6804 - Sentencing Guidelines Grid (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.org).gov
- Senate Bill 186 - 2025 Session Laws (Kansas Secretary of State)(sos.ks.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 1801 - Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
- K.S.A. 60-3104 - Protection From Abuse Orders (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.org).gov
- Kansas HB 2479 (2026), amending K.S.A. 21-6101 effective July 1, 2026 (Kansas Legislature)(kslegislature.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 60-3102 - Protection from Abuse Act definitions (Kansas Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.gov).gov