Maryland
Maryland School Recording Laws: Students, Teachers, and Campus Rules (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Recording in Maryland schools requires all-party consent under Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. ss 10-402, which applies on school grounds the same as anywhere in the state. Students, teachers, and parents cannot secretly record private conversations; FERPA adds a separate federal layer protecting student education records from unauthorized disclosure.
Recording in Maryland schools involves a mix of state wiretapping law, federal student privacy protections, and school district policies. Maryland's strict all-party consent requirement under Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. ss 10-402 applies on school grounds just as it does everywhere else in the state.
This guide covers the rules for students, parents, teachers, and school administrators regarding recording on Maryland school campuses.
The Wiretapping Statute on School Grounds
All-Party Consent Applies
Maryland's wiretapping statute does not include a school exception. The all-party consent requirement applies to:

- Student conversations in classrooms, hallways, and cafeterias
- Teacher-to-student interactions
- Parent-teacher conferences
- IEP and special education meetings
- Staff meetings and administrative discussions
- Phone calls between school staff and parents
- Conversations on school buses
Maryland's wiretap law makes it a felony to willfully record a private conversation without the consent of everyone in it, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $10,000 fine, and it has no exception for schools. This applies to students, teachers, parents, administrators, and visitors alike.
The law protects only words spoken "in private conversation" (ss 10-401(13)), which Maryland courts read as a conversation in which a speaker reasonably expected not to be overheard. A one-on-one meeting with a teacher, counselor, or IEP team usually qualifies, while a lecture to a full classroom or a loud exchange in a crowded hallway may not. Because that line is uncertain and school policies can ban recording anyway, ask permission first.
Minors and the Wiretapping Statute
Maryland's wiretapping statute does not include an age-based exception. A minor who secretly records a private conversation on school grounds can face the same legal consequences as an adult. In practice, juvenile courts handle cases involving minors differently, but the underlying conduct is still criminal.
Parents should educate their children about Maryland's recording laws and the potential consequences of secretly recording conversations at school.
Student Recording Rights and Restrictions
Can Students Record in Class?
Students in Maryland public schools should not secretly record classroom instruction, conversations with teachers, or interactions with other students: a private conversation recorded without everyone's consent is a felony, and even where a lecture may not be legally private, school policy can forbid recording it. School districts have the authority to adopt policies that further restrict student recording.
What students should not do:
- Secretly record a teacher's lecture or classroom discussion (school policy may forbid it, and a private discussion is protected by the wiretap law)
- Record private conversations with other students without consent
- Use hidden recording devices (phones, smartwatches, wearables) to capture conversations
- Record disciplinary meetings or counseling sessions without consent
What students may be able to do (with permission):
- Record a lecture with the teacher's explicit consent
- Record a class presentation for a school project with all participants' consent
- Use recording devices as an approved academic accommodation (see disability accommodations section)
School Policies on Recording Devices
Maryland school districts have broad authority to regulate student use of electronic devices on campus. Common policy provisions include:
- Prohibiting the use of cell phones during class time
- Requiring phones to be stored in lockers or turned off during school hours
- Banning the use of recording functions on any electronic device
- Establishing consequences for unauthorized recording (confiscation, suspension, referral to law enforcement)
School districts adopt these policies under their general authority to maintain order and protect student privacy. Violating a school recording policy can result in disciplinary action independent of any criminal consequences under the wiretapping statute.
Teacher and Staff Recording

Can Teachers Record Students?
Teachers cannot secretly record private conversations or phone calls with students, parents, or colleagues. The all-party consent law applies to teachers in the same way it applies to everyone else.
Teachers should not:
- Record classroom discussions without informing students and obtaining consent
- Record phone calls with parents without consent
- Record conversations with other staff members without consent
- Use hidden recording devices to monitor student behavior
Classroom Recording for Educational Purposes
If a teacher wants to record a lesson for educational purposes (creating instructional materials, self-evaluation, distance learning), they must:
- Inform all students that the class will be recorded
- Obtain consent from students (and from parents/guardians for students under 18)
- Follow the school district's policy on classroom recording
- Comply with FERPA requirements regarding student records
Teacher Protection Considerations
Teachers who face accusations of misconduct sometimes wish they could record interactions as protection. Maryland's wiretapping law prevents this for private conversations and phone calls. Instead, teachers should:
- Document interactions in writing
- Have a witness present during potentially contentious conversations
- Follow school protocols for reporting concerns
- Consult with their union representative or an attorney
Parent Recording Rights
IEP Meetings and Special Education Conferences
Parents of students with disabilities frequently want to record Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings. Under Maryland's wiretapping law, parents cannot secretly record these meetings.
However, parents can:
- Request permission to record: Ask the school district in advance if they can record the IEP meeting. Many districts will grant permission.
- Follow district policy: Some Maryland school districts have formal policies on recording IEP meetings. Check with your district.
- Know who sets the rules: The federal IDEA regulations do not address recording IEP meetings. Under Maryland's wiretap law, recording a private meeting needs every participant's consent, and district policy can add rules.
- Bring an advocate: A parent advocate or attorney can attend the meeting, take detailed notes, and serve as a witness.
Parent-Teacher Conferences
The same all-party consent rule applies to parent-teacher conferences. Parents cannot secretly record these meetings. If you want to record:
- Ask the teacher and any other participants for permission before the meeting
- If anyone declines, do not record
- Take written notes as an alternative
School Board Meetings
Public school board meetings are covered by Maryland's Open Meetings Act (General Provisions Title 3). Parents and community members have the right to record open sessions of school board meetings. Under § 3-303(b), the school board must adopt reasonable rules about recording, and the Open Meetings Compliance Board has found that a ban on videotaping is not a reasonable rule.
School Security Cameras

Where Schools Can Place Cameras
Maryland public schools commonly use security cameras for student safety. Camera placement follows the same general rules as other settings:
Permitted locations:
- Building entrances and exits
- Hallways and corridors
- Parking lots and bus loading areas
- Cafeterias and common areas
- Gymnasiums (during public events)
- Stairwells and outdoor walkways
Prohibited locations:
- Restrooms and bathrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Private offices where confidential conversations occur (unless disclosed)
- Nurse's office examination areas
- Any location where students have a reasonable expectation of visual privacy
Maryland's residence-only camera statute (Criminal Law ss 3-903) does not reach a school building. A hidden camera in a school restroom or locker room instead risks a misdemeanor under Criminal Law ss 3-902 when it was placed with prurient intent. Schools keep cameras out of these spaces regardless, for student-safety, Title IX, and disciplinary-liability reasons that do not depend on proving criminal intent.
Audio on School Security Cameras
School security cameras that capture audio must comply with ss 10-402. Since obtaining consent from every student, teacher, and visitor whose conversation might be captured is impractical, most Maryland schools disable audio on their security cameras.
Schools that use audio-enabled cameras should:
- Provide clear notice to all students, staff, and visitors
- Post signage indicating audio and video recording
- Consider whether notice alone satisfies Maryland's consent standard
- Consult with the school board attorney about compliance
School Bus Cameras
Many Maryland school buses are equipped with video cameras. These cameras serve safety purposes and are generally considered permissible when:
- Students and parents receive notice of the cameras (typically through student handbooks)
- Audio is either disabled or students are informed that audio recording occurs
- Footage is used for safety and disciplinary purposes
- Footage is stored securely and access is limited
FERPA and Student Privacy
What FERPA Protects
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects student education records. Under FERPA:
- Schools cannot release education records without parental consent (or student consent for students 18 and older)
- "Education records" include records directly related to a student that are maintained by the school
- Security camera footage and other recordings that identify students may qualify as education records
How FERPA Affects School Recording
FERPA intersects with recording in several ways:
Security camera footage: If security camera footage captures identifiable students, it may be considered an education record under FERPA. Schools must protect this footage and cannot release it to third parties without consent or a FERPA exception.
Classroom recordings: A recording of classroom instruction becomes a student's education record under FERPA only if it is directly related to that student (for example, it focuses on the student's conduct or discusses the student's grades) and the school keeps it; students who appear only in the background do not make it an education record. Teachers who record classes must comply with FERPA when storing, sharing, or retaining these recordings.
Parent access: Parents have the right to inspect their child's education records under FERPA. This may include requesting access to security camera footage that involves their child in certain circumstances.
FERPA vs. Open Records Requests
When a member of the public requests school security camera footage through a public records request, FERPA may require the school to redact or withhold footage that identifies students. The school must balance transparency obligations under Maryland's Public Information Act with student privacy protections under FERPA.
Disability Accommodations and Recording

Recording as an Accommodation
Students with certain disabilities may need to record lectures as an academic accommodation. Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), schools must provide reasonable accommodations to students with disabilities.
If recording is approved as an accommodation:
- The accommodation should be documented in the student's IEP or 504 plan
- The teacher and other students should be informed that recording will occur
- The recording should be limited to the instructional content
- The student should not use the recording to capture private conversations
- The school should establish guidelines for how the recording can be used and stored
Teacher Concerns
Some teachers object to being recorded, even as a disability accommodation. Schools must balance the teacher's concerns with the student's legal right to a reasonable accommodation. Generally, a documented disability accommodation takes precedence over a teacher's preference not to be recorded.
Virtual and Remote Learning
Online Class Recording
The shift to virtual learning raised new recording questions for Maryland schools. When classes are conducted over video conferencing platforms:
- The all-party consent law applies to audio recording of virtual classes
- Schools should establish policies on recording virtual instruction
- Students should not screen-record classes without permission
- Teachers who record virtual classes must comply with both the wiretapping statute and FERPA
- Platform-level recording notifications (Zoom's "recording in progress" indicator) provide notice but may not satisfy Maryland's strict consent standard
Penalties and Consequences
Criminal Penalties
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Secret audio recording of a private conversation on school grounds | Felony (ss 10-402) | 5 years prison, $10,000 fine |
| Camera in school restroom/locker room placed with prurient intent | Misdemeanor (ss 3-902) | Up to 1 year prison and/or $2,500 fine |
| FERPA violation (federal) | Loss of federal funding | N/A |
School Disciplinary Consequences
Students who violate recording policies may face:
- Confiscation of the recording device
- In-school or out-of-school suspension
- Expulsion for serious or repeated violations
- Referral to law enforcement for wiretapping violations
Federal Law: TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025)
The TAKE IT DOWN Act was signed into federal law on May 19, 2025. It makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of a person without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes, and since May 19, 2026 it has required online platforms to remove reported images within 48 hours, a duty the Federal Trade Commission enforces. The Act does not create a right to sue; a separate federal law, 15 U.S.C. 6851, lets a person sue over the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. This federal law is directly relevant to school settings where students may share or generate such images. These federal laws apply separately from, and alongside, Maryland Crim. Law ss 3-809 (nonconsensual intimate image distribution). Schools should update their acceptable-use and digital citizenship policies to address NCII and AI-generated content consistent with both the federal Act and existing Maryland law.
More Maryland Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Maryland Recording Laws
More Maryland Recording Topics
More Maryland Laws
- Maryland AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Maryland Dashcam Laws
- Maryland Data Privacy Laws
- Maryland Deepfake Laws
- Maryland Employee Monitoring Laws
- Maryland GPS Tracking Laws
- Maryland Police Bodycam Laws
- Maryland Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can students record teachers in Maryland schools?
Not without the teacher's consent. Maryland's all-party consent wiretapping law applies on school grounds. A student who secretly records a private conversation with a teacher commits a felony under ss 10-402, and school policy can ban recording a lecture even where it is not legally private. Students who need to record for academic purposes should ask the teacher for permission first. Students with disabilities may receive recording as a documented accommodation.
Can parents record IEP meetings in Maryland?
Not secretly. An IEP meeting is usually a private conversation, and recording a private conversation without every participant's consent is a felony under Maryland's wiretapping law (ss 10-402). However, parents can request permission to record the IEP meeting in advance. Many school districts will grant the request. Parents can also bring an advocate to take notes or request that the school provide a written summary of the meeting.
Can schools put cameras in classrooms in Maryland?
Schools can place silent video cameras in classrooms for security purposes, with appropriate notice to students, staff, and parents. Cameras must not be placed in restrooms, locker rooms, or other private areas. If cameras record audio, the school must comply with the all-party consent wiretapping law, which typically means disabling the audio feature.
Does FERPA affect school camera footage in Maryland?
Yes. Security camera footage that identifies students may qualify as an education record under FERPA. Schools must protect this footage and cannot release it to third parties without parental consent or a FERPA exception. When responding to public records requests, schools may need to redact student-identifying information from camera footage.
Can a student record bullying on school grounds in Maryland?
Secretly recording another person's private conversation is a felony in Maryland, even if the purpose is to document bullying, and whether a particular exchange is private depends on the circumstances. The better approach is to report bullying to school administrators, counselors, or parents. Maryland law requires schools to have anti-bullying policies and investigation procedures. Students should use those channels rather than risk felony charges.
Updates
We corrected this page to explain that Maryland's wiretap felony covers private conversations, so whether a lecture or hallway exchange is protected depends on the circumstances, to state that the TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025) is a criminal and platform-removal law with no private right to sue, to narrow when classroom recordings are FERPA education records, and to update a dead FERPA link. We corrected statements that Maryland's wiretap law bars recording "any meeting" or any school conversation: the felony covers private conversations and phone calls recorded without everyone's consent, and school policy can separately ban recording. We also removed an unsupported attribution to U.S. Department of Education guidance on IEP recordings.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date from 2026 to its actual date, May 19, 2025 (its platform-removal deadline has already passed and is now in force). Fixed the Open Meetings Act citation for the school-board recording right, which pointed to the wrong section, and a broken statute link for the hidden-camera law. Added the exact misdemeanor penalty for a prurient-intent camera instead of listing it as "varies."
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected a statute misattribution: the penalties table cited Criminal Law 3-903 for a hidden camera in a school restroom or locker room. Section 3-903 only reaches cameras placed inside a private residence. Re-attributed to section 3-902, which requires prurient intent, and added a clarifying paragraph.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article
§ 10-402In forcecited in 26 of our articles
§10–402. (a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subtitle it is unlawful for any person to: (1) Willfully intercept, endeavor to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; (2) Willfully disclose, or endeavor to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subtitle; or (3) Willfully use, or endeavor to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subtitle. (b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section is guilty of a felony and is subject to imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Applying section 10-402, Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. (1995) held that liability under the Maryland Wiretap Act requires proof the defendant acted willfully, an intentional violation or reckless disregard of a known legal duty; an employee's failure to check for a court order was only a jury factor on willfulness.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 1995, 104 Md. App. 1)✓Police hid a tape recorder on an officer's headquarters phone line with a phone company employee's help and no court order; the court held a section 10-402(a) claim requires proof of willful interception, and failing to ask about a court order went only to willfulness.
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG60 (Maryland Attorney General Reports 2025)“…or wire communications without the consent of all parties. Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402(a). However, the Wiretap Act contains e…”
- Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1999, 191 F.3d 463)“…1992); Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit. 15, §§ 710, 711 (West 1998); Md.Code Ann., Cts & Jud. Proc. § 10-402 (1998); Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 272,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is Plaud HIPAA Compliant? Kind Of. Here's What to Know (2026), Maryland Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent Rules, Maryland Audio Recording Laws: Two-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 10-405In forcecited in 11 of our articles
§10–405. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, whenever any wire, oral, or electronic communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of the communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of this State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this subtitle.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- King v. State (Court of Appeals of Maryland 2013, 434 Md. 472)“…that information would be in violation of this subtitle. Md.Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-405(a) (1957, 2013 Repl. Vol.).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maryland Dashcam Laws: Legality, Audio Rules, and Evidence Use (2026), Maryland Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Audio, and Privacy (2026), Maryland Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for Calls (2026)
Maryland Code, Criminal Law Article
§ 3-903In forcecited in 10 of our articles
§3–903. (a) In this section, “camera” includes any electronic device that can be used surreptitiously to observe an individual. (b) This section does not apply to: (1) an adult resident of the private residence where a camera is placed; (2) a person who places or procures another to place a camera on real property without the intent to conduct deliberate surreptitious observation of an individual inside the private residence; (3) a person who has obtained the consent of an adult resident, or the adult resident’s legal guardian, to place a camera on real property to conduct deliberate surreptitious observation of an individual inside the private residence; (4) any otherwise lawful observation with a camera conducted by a law enforcement officer while performing official duties; (5) filming conducted by a person by or for the print or broadcast media through use of a camera that is not secreted from view; (6) any part of a private residence used for business purposes, including any part of a private residence used as a family child care home for the care and custody of a child; (7) filming of a private residence by a person through use of a camera that is not located on the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lancaster v. Baltimore County Maryland (District Court, D. Maryland 2021)“…t VII); and Violation of Maryland Camera Surveillance Act, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-903 (Count VIII). (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 231–46).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maryland Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026), Maryland Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules (2026), Maryland Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits (2026)
Maryland Code, General Provisions Article
§ 3-303In force
§3–303. (a) Whenever a public body meets in open session, the general public is entitled to attend. (b) A public body shall adopt and enforce reasonable rules regarding the conduct of persons attending its meetings and the videotaping, televising, photographing, broadcasting, or recording of its meetings. (c) (1) If the presiding officer determines that the behavior of an individual is disrupting an open session, the public body may have the individual removed. (2) Unless the public body or its members or agents act maliciously, the public body, members, and agents are not liable for having an individual removed under this subsection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Sources and References
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. ss 10-402 - Interception of Communications(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- Maryland Open Meetings Act - General Provisions Title 3(law.justia.com).gov
- Maryland Criminal Law ss 3-903 - Camera Surveillance in Private Places(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Education - FERPA General Guidance(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. ss 10-405 - Suppression of Evidence(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Maryland Open Meetings Act - General Provisions ss 3-303 (recording of public meetings)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov