Indiana
Indiana AI Laws: What's Enacted and What's Next (2027)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 5, 2026). · Law checked current as of November 5, 2026. · 17 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

As of November 2026, Indiana has enacted targeted AI provisions but, in our search, no comprehensive AI act. The main ones are HB 1271 (Indiana Code 27-1-52-9), in force since July 1, 2026, which limits automated tools including AI in health claims, and SB 150 (2024), whose AI task force and state agency inventory chapters expire December 31, 2027.
How we searched: Where this page says we found no law, we mean a text search of our stored copy of the Indiana Code, captured July 29, 2026, for "artificial intelligence", "chatbot", "machine learning", "algorithm" and "automated decision", the General Assembly's pages for the bills named here, web searches, and the NAIC's list of state insurance bulletins. A code search does not reach uncodified session-law text, and we did not run a full-text search of the 2025 and 2026 acts, so a provision could be missed. Code text on this page comes from that stored copy or the enrolled acts.
This page covers Indiana state law as of November 4, 2026. It is general legal information, not legal advice. For the national picture, see our guide to US AI laws.
Indiana AI Laws at a Glance

| Measure | Subject | Status on November 4, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| HB 1271 (P.L. 88-2026), IC 27-1-52-9 | Automated tools in health claims; Medicaid excluded | Signed March 4, 2026; in force since July 1, 2026 |
| SEA 256 (P.L. 131-2026), IC 1-1-15.3 | Foreign adversary confirmation in government technology contracts, including AI | New contracts after June 30, 2026; existing contracts when amended or renewed after June 30, 2027 |
| SB 5 (P.L. 182-2025), IC 4-12-1-7.5 | State agency use of AI software for budget documents | Signed May 6, 2025; bill states effective July 1, 2025 |
| SB 150 (P.L. 108-2024), IC 2-5-53.7 and IC 4-13.1-5 | AI task force and state agency inventory | In force; both chapters expire December 31, 2027 |
| SB 5 (2023), IC 24-15 | Consumer Data Protection Act, profiling opt-out | In force since January 1, 2026 |
| HB 1047 (P.L. 79-2024), IC 35-45-4-8 | Distribution of an intimate image | Signed March 12, 2024; section effective July 1, 2024 |
| HEA 1133 (P.L. 81-2024), IC 3-9-8 | Fabricated media in campaign communications | Signed March 12, 2024; effective upon passage |
HB 1271: AI in Indiana Health Insurance Claims (IC 27-1-52-9)
HB 1271 added a chapter on downcoding of health benefits claims. Its enrolled text has three AI-related rules, each worded narrowly:
- Insurers. An insurer may not use an automated process, system or tool, "including artificial intelligence," as "the sole basis to downcode a claim based on medical necessity" without review of the covered individual's medical record by an employee or contractor of the insurer.
- Providers. A provider may not use such a tool to submit a health benefits claim without review by a provider or other person involved in developing the claim.
- Disclosure. An insurer must disclose in an easily accessible and readable manner when AI is used to make an adverse determination on a prior authorization request or to downcode a claim.
The section does not ban AI in claims handling. The insurer rule reaches sole-basis medical necessity downcoding, and the statutory word is automated, which is broader than AI. The chapter does not apply to the Medicaid program or to a managed care organization that provides services to a Medicaid recipient.

AI in Indiana State Government
AI Task Force (SB 150). SB 150 created IC 2-5-53.7, a fifteen-member "temporary task force serving the general assembly." Its enrolled text requires a report by October 31, 2024 and by October 31 of each year after that. We did not confirm what reports were filed.
State agency AI inventory. IC 4-13.1-5, effective July 1, 2025, says that not later than November 1, 2025, each state agency "may" compile an inventory of its AI technologies. It is permissive, not a mandate.
Budget documents. SB 5 (2025) added IC 4-12-1-7.5: "A state agency may use artificial intelligence software to prepare a statement required under section 7 of this chapter or any budget projections for the state agency."
Government technology contracts. IC 1-1-15.3, added by SEA 256 (P.L. 131-2026), defines a "technological product or service" to include one used for artificial intelligence, and excludes unmanned aerial systems. A contract by the state, a state agency or a political subdivision for one must require the contractor to confirm that it and its subcontractors are not prohibited persons, a term tied to foreign adversaries. It applies to new contracts after June 30, 2026 and to existing contracts amended or renewed after June 30, 2027. A breach may be regarded as a material breach of the contract.
State AI policy. This is executive policy, not a statute. The Management Performance Hub's AI page, read November 4, 2026, says Indiana implemented the policy in February 2024, that it uses the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and that "Any unapproved AI use is prohibited" for state employees. It also says the Readiness Assessment process merged with the Indiana Office of Technology's intake process as of August 2026. We read that page, not the policy document itself.
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act: Profiling Rights
The Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act, effective January 1, 2026, does not name AI. It defines profiling as "any form of solely automated processing" of personal data to evaluate, analyze or predict personal aspects of an identified or identifiable individual. A consumer may opt out of profiling "in furtherance of decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects."
The limits matter:
- Who must comply. A person doing business in Indiana or targeting its residents that, in a calendar year, controls or processes data of at least 100,000 Indiana consumers, or at least 25,000 while deriving more than 50% of gross revenue from selling personal data.
- Who is protected. A consumer is an Indiana resident acting only for a personal, family or household purpose, not someone in a commercial or employment context.
- Who is exempt. Exclusions include state government, financial institutions and data subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and HIPAA covered entities and business associates, among others.
Indiana Deepfake and Election Laws
HB 1047 broadened IC 35-45-4-8 so an intimate image includes one "created or modified by means of a computer software program, artificial intelligence, application, or other digital editing tools." Distribution is the offense, a Class A misdemeanor, or a Level 6 felony with a prior unrelated conviction under the section, and the section lists exceptions. Indiana's civil article on nonconsensual images, IC 34-21.5, defines "computer generated image" in similar terms.
HEA 1133 requires a campaign communication that includes fabricated media of a candidate to carry a disclaimer stating: "Elements of this media have been digitally altered or artificially generated." The depicted candidate may bring a civil action, with a clear and convincing evidence burden. For the details, see our guide to Indiana deepfake laws.


AI Note-Takers and Recording in Indiana
AI meeting assistants raise recording consent questions. Our guide to Indiana AI meeting recording laws covers them.
What We Did Not Find in Indiana Law
In the search described at the top of this page, through November 4, 2026, we found no Indiana statute on AI in employment decisions, no chatbot law for consumers or minors, no frontier model law, and no algorithmic pricing law. Federal and general state laws may still apply.
Indiana is not on the NAIC's list of states acting on its AI model bulletin for insurers as we read it on November 4, 2026. That list may lag, and we did not search the Indiana Department of Insurance's own bulletins. Web searches found no AI executive order from the governor and no Indiana attorney general AI enforcement action, and they would not show every order or action.
The words "artificial intelligence" also appear in two funding-related definitions in the code, a scholarship field of study (IC 21-49-7-6) and "advanced computing" in a sales tax chapter (IC 6-2.5-15-0.5). Neither regulates AI.
Indiana AI Bills That Did Not Pass
The General Assembly's action pages, read November 4, 2026, show no action on these bills after the dates below.
| Bill | Subject | Last action shown |
|---|---|---|
| HB 1620 (2025) | AI disclosure in health care | January 21, 2025: first reading, referred to Public Health |
| HB 1421 (2026) | Employer automated decision systems | January 8, 2026: first reading, referred to Employment, Labor and Pensions |
| HB 1201 (2026) | AI and mental health professionals, plus insurance items | January 22, 2026: coauthor added, after referral to Insurance on January 5 |
Federal AI Policy and Indiana
As of November 4, 2026, we found no federal statute in the public laws of the 119th Congress that sets general rules for private AI systems or generally preempts state AI laws. In December 2025, Executive Order 14365 directed federal agencies to challenge or discourage state AI laws the administration views as conflicting with national policy, and called for a federal framework from Congress. The order itself does not declare any state law invalid. The Justice Department formed an AI Litigation Task Force in January 2026, the White House issued legislative recommendations in March 2026, and the FTC proposed a policy statement in July 2026. Separately, in April 2026 the Justice Department intervened in a lawsuit against Colorado's AI law under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We did not find a published Commerce evaluation of state laws in the Federal Register or on ntia.gov, or a BEAD notice carrying the order's AI condition on NTIA's sites. See our pages on the Trump AI executive orders and state AI law preemption.
What Changes in Indiana AI Law in 2027
- After June 30, 2027: existing government contracts for a technological product or service, which includes AI, must carry the IC 1-1-15.3-7 confirmation when amended or renewed.
- December 31, 2027: the AI Task Force chapter (IC 2-5-53.7-9) and the agency inventory chapter (IC 4-13.1-5-5) expire, per the enrolled text of SB 150, unless the legislature changes them.
As of November 4, 2026, we found no other AI law scheduled to take effect in Indiana in 2027; we searched the channels listed at the top of this page.
More Indiana Laws
- Indiana Recording Laws
- Indiana Data Privacy Laws
- Indiana Background Check Laws
- Indiana Surveillance Camera Laws
- Indiana Sexting Laws
- Indiana Whistleblower Laws
- Indiana Deepfake Laws
- Indiana AI Meeting Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Indiana have an AI law?
Indiana has targeted AI provisions and, in our search as of November 2026, no comprehensive AI act. They include limits on automated tools in health claims, an intimate image law that reaches AI-made images, an election disclaimer law, an AI task force and a permissive state agency inventory.
Can an Indiana health insurer use AI to downcode a claim?
Not as the sole basis for a medical necessity downcode without review of the covered individual's medical record by an employee or contractor of the insurer. Indiana Code 27-1-52-9, in force since July 1, 2026, also requires insurers to disclose when AI is used to make an adverse prior authorization determination or to downcode a claim. The chapter does not apply to the Medicaid program or Medicaid managed care organizations.
When does Indiana's AI Task Force end?
The chapter creating it, Indiana Code 2-5-53.7, expires December 31, 2027, unless the legislature changes it. The state agency AI inventory chapter expires the same day.
Does Indiana regulate AI in hiring?
We found no Indiana statute on AI in employment decisions as of November 4, 2026, in a text search of our July 29, 2026 copy of the Indiana Code. HB 1421 on employer automated decision systems shows only a first reading on January 8, 2026. Federal and general state laws may still apply.
Is it illegal to share an AI-generated intimate image in Indiana?
It can be. Indiana Code 35-45-4-8 makes it a Class A misdemeanor to distribute an intimate image when the person knows or reasonably should know the depicted individual does not consent, or a Level 6 felony with a prior unrelated conviction under the section. The definition reaches images created or modified by AI, and the section lists exceptions.
Do Indiana political ads have to disclose AI?
A campaign communication that includes fabricated media of a candidate must carry the disclaimer that its elements have been digitally altered or artificially generated. The rule, in Indiana Code 3-9-8, turns on the statute's definition of fabricated media, not on any use of AI in an ad.
Can Indiana state employees use ChatGPT?
The state's AI policy page says employees may use only AI systems reviewed and approved by the Office of the Chief Data Officer, and that any unapproved AI use is prohibited. We read that page on November 4, 2026, not the policy document itself.
Updates
Rewrote the page: added HB 1271's bill number and date, SB 5 (2025) and the 2026 government contract rule, corrected the HEA 1133 vote claim and the outdated description of the state AI policy, and added the privacy act's scope and exclusions and the 2027 sunset dates. Added the Medicaid exclusion to the downcoding chapter and named SEA 256.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of Indiana Code 35-45-4-8, which criminalizes distributing a nonconsensual intimate image (including one created or altered with AI) rather than creating one; removed the lapsed 2025 healthcare AI bill; and added Indiana's enacted limits on AI in health insurance claim decisions, the AI Task Force's annual reporting duty, the statutory state agency AI inventory, and the December 31, 2027 sunset on both AI chapters.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
§ 35-45-4-8Distribution of an intimate imageIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
Sec. 8. (a) This section does not apply to: (1) a photograph, digital image, or video that is distributed: (A) to report a possible criminal act; (B) in connection with a criminal investigation; (C) under a court order; (D) to a location that is: (i) intended solely for the storage or backup of personal data, including photographs, digital images, and video; and (ii) password protected; or (E) by a news reporting or an entertainment medium (as defined in IC 32-36-1-4); (2) a newspaper or news service that publishes news related information through a website; (3) a cloud service provider; or (4) an Internet provider, an affiliate or subsidiary of an Internet provider, or a search engine that: (A) solely provides access or connection to a website or other Internet content that is not under the control of that Internet service provider, affiliate or subsidiary, or search engine; and (B) is not responsible for creating or publishing the content that constitutes material harmful to minors.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Also relied on in: Indiana Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Indiana Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules Explained, Indiana Security Camera Laws: Residential, Business, and Rental Rules
Indiana Code, TITLE 2. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
§ 2-5-53.7-4Artificial intelligence task force establishedIn force
Sec. 4. The artificial intelligence task force is established as a temporary task force serving the general assembly.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 2-5-53.7-8Task force duties; study; reportIn force
Sec. 8. The task force shall do the following: (1) Conduct a study of: (A) artificial intelligence technology that has been used, developed, or considered for use by state agencies as reported under IC 4-13.1-5; and (B) recommendations issued by other state, institutional, or academic bodies regarding use of artificial intelligence technology in government. (2) Assess documented and potential: (A) benefits and risks to state agencies of state agency use of artificial intelligence technology; and (B) effects of state agency use of artificial intelligence technology on the rights and interests of Indiana residents, including on the: (i) constitutional and legal rights; (ii) privacy interests; (iii) employment; and (iv) economic welfare; of Indiana residents. (3) Not later than October 31, 2024, and not later than October 31 of each year thereafter, adopt and submit to the executive director of the legislative services agency, for distribution to the members of the general assembly, a report that includes the following: (A) The results of the task force's study under subdivision (1) and assessment under subdivision (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 2-5-53.7-9ExpirationIn force
Sec. 9. This chapter expires December 31, 2027.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Indiana Code, TITLE 4. STATE OFFICES AND ADMINISTRATION
§ 4-13.1-5-1"Artificial intelligence"In force
Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "artificial intelligence" means computing technology that is capable of simulating human learning, reasoning, and deduction through processes such as: (1) acquiring and analyzing information for the purpose of improving operational accuracy through improved contextual knowledge; (2) identifying patterns in data; and (3) improving operational outcomes by analyzing the results of a previous operation and using the analysis to modify the operation to achieve an improved result.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 4-13.1-5-3State agency inventory of artificial intelligence technologiesIn force
Sec. 3. (a) Not later than November 1, 2025, each state agency may: (1) compile, in a form specified by the office, an inventory of all artificial intelligence technologies that are: (A) in use; or (B) being developed or considered by the state agency for use; by the state agency; and (2) submit the inventory to: (A) the office; and (B) the executive director of the legislative services agency for distribution to the members of the artificial intelligence task force established by IC 2-5-53.7. (b) A state agency's inventory under subsection (a) must include the following information for each artificial intelligence technology included in the inventory: (1) The vendor of the artificial intelligence technology. (2) A description of the function and capabilities of the artificial intelligence technology.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 4-13.1-5-4Form for artificial intelligence technology inventoryIn force
Sec. 4. Not later than August 1, 2025, the office may prescribe a form for use by state agencies for compilation and submission of the inventory under section 3 of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
§ 4-13.1-5-5ExpirationIn force
Sec. 5. This chapter expires December 31, 2027.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Indiana Code, TITLE 27. INSURANCE
§ 27-1-52-9Limitation on use of automated process, system, or toolIn force
Sec. 9. (a) An insurer may not use an automated: (1) process; (2) system; or (3) tool, including artificial intelligence; as the sole basis to downcode a claim based on medical necessity without the review of the covered individual's medical record by an employee or contractor of the insurer. (b) A provider may not use an automated: (1) process; (2) system; or (3) tool, including artificial intelligence; to submit a health benefits claim without the review of a provider or other person involved in the development of the claim for submission. (c) An insurer must disclose in an easily accessible and readable manner when artificial intelligence is used to: (1) make an adverse determination on a prior authorization request; or (2) downcode a claim.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Indiana Code, TITLE 34. CIVIL LAW AND PROCEDURE
§ 34-21.5-3-1Action for disclosure of nonconsensual pornographyIn force
Sec. 1. (a) A depicted individual who is identifiable and suffered harm may bring an action for disclosing nonconsensual pornography against a person who: (1) creates or obtains an intimate image of the depicted individual: (A) under circumstances in which a reasonable person would know or understand that the intimate image of the depicted individual was to remain private, including but not limited to an intimate image shared within the context of a sexual relationship that was then disclosed beyond that relationship; (B) under false pretenses; or (C) without authorization or by exceeding authorized access to property, accounts, messages, files, devices, or resources; (2) discloses the intimate image depicting the individual to a third party, with the intent to: (A) harass; (B) intimidate; (C) threaten; (D) coerce; (E) embarrass; (F) gain profit at the expense of; or (G) cause physical or financial injury or serious emotional distress to; the depicted person; and (3) knows or acts with reckless disregard for whether the depicted individual: (A) was identifiable in the intimate image; and (B) did not consent to the disclosure of the intimate image to a third party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Browne v. Waldo (District Court, N.D. Indiana 2021)“…sual pornography against Hearn and Waldo, pursuant to I.C. § 34-21.5-3-1; • Count XIV, alleg…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Indiana HB 1271 (2026), actions: Public Law 88, signed March 4, 2026(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HB 1271, enrolled act, IC 27-1-52(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana SB 150 (2024), actions: Public Law 108(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana SB 150, enrolled act, IC 2-5-53.7 and IC 4-13.1-5(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana SB 5 (2025), actions: Public Law 182(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code 1-1-15.3-7: required contract provisions (stored copy, July 29, 2026)(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Management Performance Hub: State of Indiana AI Policy and Guidance(www.in.gov).gov
- Indiana SB 5 (2023), enrolled act, Consumer Data Protection Act(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HB 1047 (2024), actions: Public Law 79(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HB 1047, enrolled act, IC 35-45-4-8(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HEA 1133 (2024), actions: Public Law 81(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HEA 1133, enrolled act, IC 3-9-8(iga.in.gov).gov
- NAIC, Implementation of the Model Bulletin on Use of AI Systems by Insurers(content.naic.org)
- Indiana HB 1620 (2025), actions(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HB 1421 (2026), actions(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana HB 1201 (2026), actions(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana SB 256 (2026), enrolled act, IC 1-1-15.3(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana SB 256 (2026), actions: Public Law 131, signed March 5, 2026(iga.in.gov).gov