Maine
Maine School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Maine's one-party consent law, 15 M.R.S.A. sections 709 and 710, allows any participant in a school conversation to record it without notifying others. School districts may still restrict recording devices through campus policy, and violations carry disciplinary rather than criminal consequences. FERPA does not bar parents or students from making their own recordings.
Recording in Maine schools involves a balance between the state's one-party consent wiretapping law, federal student privacy regulations, and individual school district policies. Whether you are a parent wanting to record an IEP meeting, a student documenting a classroom interaction, or a teacher concerned about being recorded, understanding the legal framework is essential.
Maine Recording Law in Schools
One-Party Consent Applies
Maine is a one-party consent state under 15 M.R.S.A. section 709 and section 710. Any person who is a party to a conversation can record it without informing others. In a school context:

- A student can record a conversation with a teacher, counselor, or administrator
- A parent can record a parent-teacher conference or IEP meeting
- A teacher can record a conversation with a student, parent, or colleague
- An administrator can record meetings with staff or parents
The person recording must be a participant. Planting a recording device in a classroom to capture private conversations you are not part of, without a participant's permission, can be a Class C crime under 15 M.R.S.A. section 710.
School District Policies vs. State Law
While Maine law permits one-party consent recording, schools control device use on campus. Under a 2026 state budget law, every Maine school board had to adopt and carry out, by August 1, 2026, a policy prohibiting student use of personal electronic devices for the duration of the school day, from starting bell to dismissal bell (20-A M.R.S. section 1001(23)). The state's model policy must include exceptions for a student's IEP, a documented Section 504 accommodation, prescribed medical care in an individualized health care plan, and language support for an emergent English learner when no other translation option is available.
District handbooks may also:
- Restrict cell phones and recording devices during class
- Require devices to be turned off during instructional time
- Prohibit recording teachers or students without permission
- Establish disciplinary consequences for unauthorized recording
Important distinction: Violating a school recording policy is a disciplinary matter, not a criminal one. A student who records in violation of school policy may face school-imposed consequences, but the recording itself is not illegal under Maine law.
Private Schools
Private schools in Maine have broader authority to restrict recording. Private school administrators can prohibit recording devices entirely as a condition of enrollment.
Recording at School Board Meetings

Maine's Freedom of Access Act
Maine's Freedom of Access Act (1 M.R.S.A. section 404) entitles the public to attend open proceedings, including school board meetings, and to make written, taped, or filmed records or live broadcasts of them, as long as doing so does not interfere with the orderly conduct of the proceeding. Under this law:
- Recording devices cannot be prohibited at open public meetings
- You do not need the board's permission to record, though the board may make reasonable rules about recording that do not defeat the public's access rights
- Any type of recording device is permitted
- Reasonable rules about equipment placement may be established to avoid disruption
Executive Sessions
School boards can enter executive sessions for specific purposes such as personnel matters, student discipline, or attorney-client discussions. Recording is not permitted during executive sessions.
Recording IEP and Special Education Meetings

Parents' Right to Record
Maine's special education rule gives parents a specific right here. The Maine Unified Special Education Regulation (MUSER, 05-071 CMR ch. 101), section VI.2.K, says parents "shall be permitted to audio record any IEP meeting regarding their child at their own expense." The rule covers audio recording; it does not address parents making video recordings.
Maine's one-party consent law adds that recording a meeting you take part in is not a crime. The federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) does not itself give parents a right to record. U.S. Department of Education guidance (64 Fed. Reg. 12477, March 12, 1999) lets a school limit or prohibit recording of IEP meetings unless a parent needs the recording to understand the IEP or the process, and leaves states free to allow more. Maine's rule does.
Maine Department of Education Guidance
The Maine Department of Education oversees special education services. The department's rule, MUSER, is the source of the parent's audio-recording right described above. The same provision lets schools audio record IEP meetings too, or video record them for families who are deaf or hard of hearing. A recording the school makes becomes part of the child's education record.
A district may ask you to tell the team ahead of time that you plan to record, or may make its own recording alongside yours. Neither takes away the right MUSER gives parents to audio record.
Best Practices for IEP Meeting Recording
- Check your district's recording policy
- Consider informing the team as a courtesy
- Use a reliable device with sufficient battery
- Place the recorder where it captures all speakers
- Review recordings to confirm agreed-upon services are accurate
When Districts Object
If a district objects to recording:
- Point the team to MUSER section VI.2.K, which says parents shall be permitted to audio record any IEP meeting about their child at their own expense
- Ask the district to put its objection and its reason in writing
- If you need the recording to understand the IEP or the process, for example because of a disability or a language barrier, say so; federal guidance requires the school to allow recording in that situation
- Federal Section 504 rules bar a school from intimidating or retaliating against a family for asserting a child's disability rights (34 C.F.R. 104.61, incorporating 34 C.F.R. 100.7(e))
- Giving advance notice can prevent disruptions
Student Recording Rights

Classroom Recording
Recording a conversation you participate in is not a crime in Maine. However, under the statewide bell-to-bell policy, students generally may not use phones or other personal electronic devices at any point in the school day unless an exception, such as an IEP or 504 accommodation, applies.
Common scenarios:
- Recording lectures for note-taking (often permitted with teacher approval)
- Recording conversations about grades or discipline
- Recording interactions during disputes
- Recording conversations with counselors or administrators
Students with Disabilities
Students who need to record lectures as an accommodation have additional protections under Section 504 and IDEA. If recording is in the student's IEP or 504 plan, the school cannot restrict it even if general policy prohibits recording.
Student Discipline for Recording
Disciplinary action for recording must comply with due process procedures. Students facing suspension or expulsion are entitled to notice, an opportunity to be heard, and the right to appeal.
Teacher and Staff Recording Rights
Teachers Recording
Maine teachers can record conversations they participate in with students, parents, and colleagues. Common reasons include documenting student behavior, recording parent-teacher conferences, and capturing evidence of threats or harassment.
Being Recorded
Teachers should be aware that in Maine, recording a conversation you take part in is not a crime, even when it breaks school policy. Professional conduct and adherence to school policies provide protection regardless of recording.
Security Cameras in Maine Schools
School Authority to Install Cameras
Maine public schools can install security cameras for safety purposes. Common locations include:
- Hallways and corridors
- Entrances and exits
- Parking lots and exterior grounds
- Cafeterias and common areas
- Bus loading zones
Where Cameras Are Prohibited
Cameras cannot be placed where students and staff have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Restrooms and locker rooms
- Changing areas
- Nursing or health offices during examinations
- Private counseling rooms
Installing cameras in these locations could violate 17-A M.R.S.A. section 511.
Audio on Security Cameras
Security cameras with audio capabilities raise additional legal questions. If cameras record conversations, the school should provide notice, as the school itself is not a party to conversations between students.
FERPA and Recording in Schools
What FERPA Covers
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects student education records. FERPA applies to schools receiving federal funding, which includes virtually all Maine public schools.
FERPA and Personal Recording
FERPA governs what schools do with records. It does not prohibit parents or students from making their own recordings. A parent recording an IEP meeting is creating their own record, not accessing a school record.
However, if your recording captures other students' personally identifiable information, sharing it publicly could raise privacy concerns.
Recording School Sports and Events
Public Events
School athletic events, concerts, plays, and graduations open to the public can generally be recorded. These are public events with reduced privacy expectations.
Restrictions at School Events
Schools may set reasonable restrictions:
- No flash photography during performances
- No equipment blocking other spectators' views
- No live streaming that could expose student privacy
- No commercial use of recordings
More Maine Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
More Maine Recording Topics
More Maine Laws
- Maine AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Maine Dashcam Laws
- Maine Data Privacy Laws
- Maine Deepfake Laws
- Maine Employee Monitoring Laws
- Maine GPS Tracking Laws
- Maine Police Bodycam Laws
- Maine Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my child's IEP meeting in Maine?
Yes. Maine's special education rule (MUSER, 05-071 CMR ch. 101, section VI.2.K) says parents shall be permitted to audio record any IEP meeting regarding their child, at their own expense. Maine's one-party consent law (15 M.R.S.A. sections 709 and 710) also means recording a meeting you attend is not a crime. The federal IDEA does not itself create a right to record, so the Maine rule is what protects you. Letting the team know in advance is a good courtesy.
Can a student record a teacher in class in Maine?
Under Maine law, a student participating in a conversation can record it. However, every Maine public school board must now bar student use of personal electronic devices for the whole school day, so recording on a phone in class will usually break school policy. Violating the policy may result in disciplinary action, though the recording is not a criminal offense.
Can I record a school board meeting in Maine?
Yes. Maine's Freedom of Access Act (1 M.R.S.A. section 404) protects the right to record at open public meetings, including school board meetings. No advance permission is needed, as long as recording does not interfere with the orderly conduct of the meeting, though the board may set reasonable rules, such as where equipment goes.
Can schools put security cameras in classrooms in Maine?
Yes, schools can install cameras in classrooms and common areas. However, cameras cannot be placed in restrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas where students have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Audio recording on cameras raises additional one-party consent concerns.
Does FERPA prevent me from recording at my child's school in Maine?
No. FERPA governs what schools do with student records. It does not restrict parents or students from making their own recordings. However, be careful about sharing recordings that capture other students' private information.
Updates
We narrowed a statement about hidden classroom recorders to match Maine's wiretap law, which protects private conversations and lets a participant authorize recording; the page also reflects Maine's 2026 bell-to-bell school device law (20-A M.R.S. 1001(23)).
Corrected the IEP recording section to cite Maine's special education rule (MUSER section VI.2.K), which gives parents the right to audio record IEP meetings, and the accurate federal baseline, removed an unsupported claim that a district cannot cancel a meeting, and added Maine's 2026 statewide bell-to-bell student phone policy (20-A M.R.S. 1001(23)).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the school board meeting recording right to cite 1 M.R.S.A. section 404 (Recorded or live broadcasts authorized, current law) instead of the repealed COVID-era section 403-A, and corrected the one-party consent citation from section 712 (unrelated carrier/law-enforcement exceptions) to sections 709-710 (the definition of "intercept" and the interception offense, which together establish participant consent).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Cross-spoke accuracy check: school recording under FERPA (20 U.S.C. section 1232g) and Maine one-party consent (15 M.R.S. sections 709-710) confirmed current. Private-place rule (17-A M.R.S. section 511) applies to school locker rooms and bathrooms. No substantive law changes required.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL, Part 2: PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL, Chapter 102: INTERCEPTION OF WIRE AND ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
§ 710OffensesIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
1. Interception, oral communications prohibited. Any person, other than an employee of a communication common carrier, a law enforcement officer, an investigative officer, another employee of the Department of Corrections authorized to exercise law enforcement powers as described in Title 34‑A, section 3011 or a jail investigative officer or a jail employee acting at the direction of a jail investigative officer, carrying out practices otherwise permitted by this chapter, who intentionally or knowingly intercepts, attempts to intercept or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire or oral communication is guilty of a Class C crime. 2. Editing of tape recordings in judicial proceedings prohibited. Any person who knowingly or intentionally edits, alters or tampers with any tape, transcription or other sound recording, or knows of such editing, altering or tampering, and presents that recording in any judicial proceeding or proceeding under oath, without fully indicating the nature of the changes made and the original state of the recording, is guilty of a Class C crime. 3. Disclosure or use of wire or oral communications prohibited.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Williams v. Poulos (1993) affirmed section 710(1) liability for intercepting employee calls and held section 710(3)(A) and (B) require only knowledge the information came through interception. Glenn A. Griffin v. Cristie J. Griffin (2014) allowed a parent's vicarious consent for a young child only on a good faith best-interest belief.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Glenn A. Griffin v. Cristie J. Griffin (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2014, 92 A.3d 1144)✓A father recorded his six-year-old daughter's nightly calls with her mother after overhearing abusive remarks; the court held a parent with a good faith, objectively reasonable best-interest belief may vicariously consent under section 709(4)(C), so section 710 was not violated.
- Archer v. Androscoggin County (Superior Court of Maine 2022)✓An attorney sought recordings of another inmate's jail calls under Maine's public records law; the court applied the wiretap chapter that makes interception a crime under section 710 and held a court-appointed defense lawyer is not within the section 712(4) disclosure exception.
- Williams v. Poulos (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 1993)✓Company owners secretly recorded employee phone calls using alligator clips wired to a VCR, and their lawyers then used the tapes; the First Circuit affirmed liability under section 710, holding subsection 3 requires only knowledge that the material came from an interception.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Smart Glasses Recording Laws: What You Need to Know, Maine Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent, § 710 and § 511, Maine Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS, Chapter 13: PUBLIC RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS
§ 404Recorded or live broadcasts authorizedIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
In order to facilitate the public policy so declared by the Legislature of opening the public's business to public scrutiny, all persons shall be entitled to attend public proceedings and to make written, taped or filmed records of the proceedings, or to live broadcast the same, provided the writing, taping, filming or broadcasting does not interfere with the orderly conduct of proceedings. The body or agency holding the public proceedings may make reasonable rules and regulations governing these activities, so long as these rules or regulations do not defeat the purpose of this subchapter. [PL 1975, c. 758 (RPR).]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1998
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Fletcher v. Feeney (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1979, 400 A.2d 1084)“…declaratory judgments pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 5951-5963; 1 M.R.S.A. § 404—A(2) provides in certain circumstances…”
- Martin v. Unemployment Insurance Commission (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1998, 723 A.2d 412)“…regulations do not defeat the purpose of this subehapter. 1 M.R.S.A. § 404 (1989). [¶ 12] The Commission respond…”
- Ethyl Corp. v. Adams (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1977, 375 A.2d 1065)“…e Chenery Decision, 21 Adm.L.Rev. 1 (1968). The impact of 1 M.R.S.A. § 404 — A, if complied with, will often be to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Laws on Recording in Public: Your Complete Guide (2026)
Sources and References
- 15 M.R.S.A. section 710 - Interception of Communications (Maine Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 1 M.R.S.A. § 404 - Freedom of Access Act, Public Proceedings(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- FERPA - U.S. Department of Education Student Privacy Policy Office(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- IDEA - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act(sites.ed.gov).gov
- Section 504 FAQ - U.S. Department of Education OCR(ed.gov).gov
- 05-071 CMR ch. 101, Maine Unified Special Education Regulation (MUSER), section VI.2.K - Audio Recording of IEP Meetings (Maine Department of Education)(maine.gov).gov