Iowa
Iowa Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No Iowa law forbids openly recording police officers performing their duties in public, and many federal appeals courts have held that the First Amendment protects it. The Eighth Circuit, which covers Iowa, has not decided the question. Iowa Code 808B.2 separately allows audio recording of any police encounter you participate in, with no notice required. Police generally need a warrant to search your phone, although they may hold it briefly while they get one.
Recording police officers in public is not a crime in Iowa, and many federal appeals courts have held it is protected by the First Amendment. The Eighth Circuit, which covers Iowa, has not decided whether the First Amendment protects recording police; in Molina v. Book (2023) it held that any such right was not clearly established in 2015. Iowa's one-party consent law under Iowa Code 808B.2 separately allows you to audio record any conversation you participate in.
This guide covers your rights when recording police in Iowa, what officers can and cannot legally do in response to being recorded, how to protect yourself and your recordings during encounters with law enforcement, and how police body camera footage is handled under Iowa law.
The Law on Recording Police in Iowa
Constitutional Foundation
Eight federal appeals courts (the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits) have held that the First Amendment protects recording police officers doing their jobs in public, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner limits, and the Fourth Circuit has held that livestreaming a police traffic stop is protected speech. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the question, and the Sixth, Eighth, and D.C. Circuits have not recognized the right, so those decisions are persuasive in Iowa but not binding. The ACLU of Iowa takes the position that photographing or recording things plainly visible in public is constitutionally protected. The Eighth Circuit has held, in Ness v. City of Bloomington, No. 20-2571 (8th Cir. 2021), that taking photos and video in a public park to inform the public about a controversy is protected speech, while noting that recording unrelated to an expressive purpose may not receive First Amendment protection. It has not decided whether the First Amendment protects recording police.

Key principles from the circuits that have recognized the right:
- Citizens have the right to record police officers carrying out their duties in public
- This right extends to all forms of recording: video, audio, photography, and live streaming
- The right to record is not unlimited but can only be restricted through narrowly tailored, content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions
- Officers who retaliate against citizens for recording may be held personally liable under 42 U.S.C. 1983
Iowa State Law Protections
Iowa's one-party consent law provides additional protection for recording police. Under Iowa Code 808B.2(2)(c), you can record any conversation you participate in without informing the other party. When you interact with a police officer, you are a party to that conversation and can legally record it.
This means you can:
- Record traffic stops where you are the driver or passenger
- Record conversations with officers who approach you in public
- Record interactions during arrests or detentions where you are involved
- Audio record any police encounter you are part of
What You Can Record
In Iowa, you can legally record:
- Traffic stops (your own or those happening in public view)
- Arrests occurring in public spaces
- Police conducting searches or investigations in public
- Officers interacting with civilians on streets and sidewalks
- Police responses to accidents, emergencies, or disturbances in public
- Protests, demonstrations, and crowd control operations
- Public press conferences and police statements
- Government meetings where law enforcement presents
What Police Officers Can and Cannot Do

Officers Cannot:
Search your phone or hold it indefinitely without a warrant. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures. Officers may hold a phone briefly if they have probable cause it contains evidence, while they seek a warrant, but in Robbins v. City of Des Moines (2021) the Eighth Circuit held a 12-day seizure of a man's phone and camera, without probable cause, unreasonable. The Supreme Court's ruling in Riley v. California (2014) held that police generally need a warrant to search a cell phone.
Note on orders to stop recording. No Iowa law or Eighth Circuit ruling clearly bars an officer from telling you to stop recording. If ordered to stop, you can say you do not consent, keep a safe distance, comply with lawful orders, and challenge the order later. Simply holding up a phone and filming is not, by itself, interference.
Delete your recordings. Destroying evidence on your device is illegal. An officer who deletes recordings from your phone may face charges for destruction of evidence and civil liability.
Arrest you without probable cause. Recording police openly is not a crime in Iowa, so recording alone gives no probable cause for an arrest. An arrest without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment and can give rise to a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983.
Demand your passcode or unlock your phone. Without a warrant, officers cannot compel you to unlock your device or provide access to your recordings.
Officers Can:
Order you to move back. Police can establish a perimeter for safety purposes and order bystanders, including those recording, to move to a reasonable distance. You must comply with lawful orders to relocate.
Restrict access to crime scenes. Active crime scenes, accident scenes, and emergency response areas may be cordoned off. You do not have the right to enter restricted areas to record.
Enforce trespass laws. If you are on private property without permission while recording police, you can be charged with trespass.
Detain you for legitimate reasons. If police have reasonable suspicion that you are involved in criminal activity (beyond just recording), they can detain you briefly under Terry v. Ohio.
How to Record Police Safely in Iowa

Practical Guidelines
Stay at a safe distance. Record from a location where you are not interfering with police operations. Sidewalks, public areas across the street, and your own vehicle are generally safe locations.
Do not obstruct officers. Physical interference with police operations can result in obstruction charges under Iowa Code 719.1 (interference with official acts). Keep your distance and do not block officers' movements.
Know when you must identify yourself. Iowa does not have a "stop and identify" statute that requires you to provide identification to police on demand. However, drivers must provide identification during traffic stops under Iowa Code 321.174.
Remain calm and polite. Asserting your rights does not require being confrontational. Calmly say that you are recording and do not intend to interfere.
Do not resist if officers attempt to take your device. If an officer unlawfully seizes your phone, do not physically resist. Comply with the seizure and challenge it later through legal channels. Physical resistance can lead to additional charges.
Protecting Your Recordings
Use cloud backup. Configure your phone to automatically upload recordings to cloud storage (iCloud, Google Drive, or similar services). If your device is seized or damaged, the recording is preserved.
Lock your phone. Use a passcode, fingerprint, or face recognition to lock your device. This prevents unauthorized access to your recordings.
Live stream when possible. Live streaming to platforms like Facebook Live, Instagram Live, or YouTube creates a real-time copy that cannot be deleted by seizing your device.
Note officer information. Record badge numbers, patrol car numbers, and the time and location of the encounter.
Recording During Traffic Stops

Your Rights as a Driver
When you are pulled over in Iowa, no Iowa law bars you from recording the entire interaction. The traffic stop is a conversation you are participating in, so Iowa's one-party consent law applies to the audio component.
You can:
- Keep your dashcam running throughout the stop
- Use your phone to record video and audio of the interaction
- Record the officer's statements, your responses, and the overall encounter
You should:
- Keep your hands visible at all times
- Inform the officer if you need to reach for your phone to start recording
- Mount or position the phone so you do not need to hold it while driving or interacting with the officer
- Comply with the officer's lawful requests (license, registration, insurance)
Your Rights as a Passenger
Passengers in a vehicle during a traffic stop can record it the same way the driver can. A passenger can use their phone to record the interaction with police.
Your Rights as a Bystander
If you witness a traffic stop while driving by or walking past, you can record from a public area (such as a sidewalk or your own vehicle pulled safely to the side of the road). You do not need to be a party to the traffic stop to film it from a distance. However, do not approach the stopped vehicle or interfere with the stop.
Police Body Cameras in Iowa
Iowa Body Camera Requirements
Iowa law does not mandate body cameras for all law enforcement officers. Individual departments set their own policies. However, many Iowa law enforcement agencies have adopted body camera programs voluntarily.
The Iowa Department of Public Safety provides guidelines for law enforcement agencies that choose to implement body camera programs. Key aspects include:
- When officers must activate cameras (typically during all enforcement contacts)
- Data retention periods (how long footage is stored)
- Who can access the footage
- Circumstances under which footage can be released to the public
Accessing Body Camera Footage
Body camera footage from Iowa law enforcement is generally subject to Iowa's Open Records Act (Iowa Code Chapter 22). However, there are significant exemptions:
- Iowa Code 22.7(5) lets agencies keep peace officers' investigative reports confidential, and agencies have treated bodycam footage as part of those reports even after an investigation ends (the Iowa Public Information Board accepted that view in the Klein matter), though the date, time, location and immediate facts and circumstances of an incident must generally be released
- Footage containing personal information of victims, witnesses, or minors may be redacted
- Footage related to undercover operations or confidential informants may be exempt
- Agencies may charge reasonable fees for reviewing and providing copies of footage
To request body camera footage, submit a written open records request to the law enforcement agency. The agency must respond within a reasonable time. If your request is denied, you can appeal to the Iowa Public Information Board.
Using Body Camera Footage as Evidence
Body camera footage is frequently used as evidence in Iowa criminal and civil cases. Both prosecutors and defendants can request body camera footage through discovery. The footage is admissible if it is authenticated and relevant to the proceedings.
Recording Government Meetings in Iowa
Iowa's Open Meetings Law
Iowa Code Chapter 21 requires that meetings of governmental bodies be open to the public. This includes:
- City council meetings
- County board of supervisors meetings
- School board meetings
- Commission and committee meetings
- Public hearings
The public has the right to attend and record these meetings. Iowa Code 21.7 provides that the public may use cameras or recording devices at any open session, although a governmental body may set reasonable rules to keep its meetings orderly. If a governmental body attempts to prevent recording, this may violate the Open Meetings Law.
Closed Sessions
Government bodies may go into closed session only for specific purposes enumerated in Iowa Code 21.5. Common reasons include:
- Personnel matters (hiring, evaluation, discipline of specific employees)
- Litigation strategy
- Real estate transactions
- Collective bargaining strategy
The public, including those with recording equipment, must leave during closed sessions. The governmental body must publicly announce the reason for the closed session and vote to enter it.
Recording in Courtrooms
Iowa courts have specific rules governing recording during court proceedings. The Iowa Supreme Court has issued guidelines for media coverage that generally require:
- Permission from the presiding judge before recording
- Compliance with equipment placement and positioning rules
- Restrictions on recording jury members, minors, or certain witnesses
- Prohibition of recording during sidebar conferences
Contact the specific court clerk for rules about recording in a particular courthouse.
What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated
If Police Confiscate Your Device
- Clearly state: "I do not consent to the seizure of my device"
- Do not physically resist
- Ask for the officer's name and badge number
- Note the time, location, and circumstances
- Contact a civil rights attorney as soon as possible
- File a complaint with the police department's internal affairs division
- Contact the ACLU of Iowa if you believe your civil rights were violated
If You Are Arrested for Recording
- Do not resist arrest
- Invoke your right to remain silent (beyond providing identification)
- Request an attorney
- Do not consent to a search of your device
- Document everything you remember as soon as possible
- Contact a criminal defense attorney and a civil rights attorney
Civil Rights Lawsuits
Under 42 U.S.C. 1983, you can file a federal civil rights lawsuit against officers who violate your constitutional rights while you are recording police. Potential remedies include:
- Compensatory damages for financial losses and emotional distress
- Punitive damages for egregious violations
- Injunctive relief requiring policy changes
- Attorney's fees and court costs
Qualified immunity frequently shields Iowa officers in recording-related suits. In Robbins v. City of Des Moines, 984 F.3d 673 (8th Cir. 2021), the Eighth Circuit granted officers qualified immunity on a First Amendment retaliation claim brought by a man who was recording vehicles and officers from a public sidewalk next to the Des Moines Police Station. The court assumed, without deciding, that Robbins had a constitutionally protected right to record, but held the officers did not violate clearly established law because Robbins's own uncooperative and evasive conduct, combined with the officers' independent suspicions about recent car thefts in the area, gave them reason to detain him for something more than simply recording.
More recently, in Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023), a divided panel held that observing and recording police-citizen interactions was not a clearly established First Amendment right as of a 2015 incident. The majority read the Eighth Circuit's earlier decision in Chestnut v. Wallace, 947 F.3d 1085 (8th Cir. 2020) narrowly, as a Fourth Amendment holding about passively watching police from a distance rather than a general First Amendment right to record. Judge Benton dissented, arguing that Chestnut and Walker v. City of Pine Bluff, 414 F.3d 989 (8th Cir. 2005) had already clearly established that right. Iowa plaintiffs suing under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for recording-related retaliation face this qualified-immunity hurdle: the Eighth Circuit has assumed, for the sake of argument, that a right to record exists but, as of Molina, has not treated it as clearly established for purposes of overcoming qualified immunity.
Recording Interactions With Other Government Officials
Department of Human Services (DHS) Workers
You can record your interactions with Iowa DHS workers. As a participant in the conversation, Iowa's one-party consent law applies. This right covers home visits, office meetings, and phone calls.
Building Inspectors and Code Enforcement
You can record interactions with inspectors and code enforcement officers who visit your property. These are government officials performing their duties, and no Iowa law forbids openly recording them. Iowa's one-party consent rule also lets you record conversations you take part in.
School Officials at Public Schools
You can record conversations with public school administrators, teachers, and staff at meetings you attend (such as parent-teacher conferences or IEP meetings), subject to Iowa's one-party consent law. However, schools may restrict recording in classrooms and other instructional settings.
More Iowa Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
More Iowa Recording Topics
More Iowa Laws
- Iowa AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Iowa Dashcam Laws
- Iowa Data Privacy Laws
- Iowa Deepfake Laws
- Iowa Employee Monitoring Laws
- Iowa GPS Tracking Laws
- Iowa Police Bodycam Laws
- Iowa Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record police officers in Iowa?
Yes, in the sense that no Iowa law forbids openly recording police in public. Many federal appeals courts have held the First Amendment protects it, but the Eighth Circuit, which covers Iowa, has not decided the question. Iowa's one-party consent law under Iowa Code 808B.2 also allows you to audio record any police interaction you are part of. You must not physically interfere with police operations while recording.
Can police confiscate my phone for recording them in Iowa?
Police generally need a warrant to search the data on your phone (Riley v. California, 2014), but they may hold a phone briefly if they have probable cause that it contains evidence, while they seek a warrant. Keeping it for days without justification can violate the Fourth Amendment: in Robbins v. City of Des Moines (2021) the Eighth Circuit held a 12-day seizure unreasonable. If an officer takes your phone, do not resist but clearly state you do not consent to the seizure and contact an attorney.
Can I be arrested for recording police in Iowa?
Recording police openly in a public space is not a crime in Iowa, so recording alone does not give officers probable cause to arrest you, and an arrest without probable cause can support a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983. A First Amendment retaliation claim is harder to win in Iowa, because the Eighth Circuit has not held that recording police is clearly established as protected. However, you can be arrested if your recording activity involves interfering with police operations, trespassing, or other criminal conduct.
How do I get police body camera footage in Iowa?
Submit a written open records request under Iowa Code Chapter 22 to the law enforcement agency. The agency must respond within a reasonable time. Agencies may withhold footage as part of confidential peace officers' investigative reports under Iowa Code 22.7(5), even after an investigation ends, though they must generally release the date, time, location and immediate facts of the incident. Footage may also be withheld or redacted if it contains personal information of victims or minors, or involves undercover operations. If denied, you can appeal to the Iowa Public Information Board.
Can I record a public government meeting in Iowa?
Yes. Iowa's Open Meetings Law (Iowa Code Chapter 21) requires most government meetings to be open to the public, and recording of open meetings is generally permitted. Iowa Code 21.7 lets the public use cameras or recording devices at any open session, although the body may set reasonable rules to keep the meeting orderly. However, recording during closed sessions authorized under Iowa Code 21.5 is not permitted.
Updates
Added the Eighth Circuit's caveat in Ness v. City of Bloomington that recording unrelated to an expressive purpose may not be protected.
Removed an unqualified claim that recording building inspectors is a protected right, since the federal appeals court covering Iowa has not decided that question.
We corrected the page to say that the Eighth Circuit, which covers Iowa, has not decided whether the First Amendment protects recording police (other circuits have), that police may briefly hold a phone while seeking a warrant though they generally need one to search it, and that no Iowa or Eighth Circuit ruling bars an order to stop recording; we also corrected the bodycam records exemption under Iowa Code 22.7(5) and removed the legislature from the open-meetings list. We clarified that the Eighth Circuit protects photographing and video recording in public to inform the public (Ness v. City of Bloomington, 2021) but has not decided whether recording police is protected, removed wording that assumed a recognized right to record police, added the reasonable-rules limit to the open-meetings takeaway, and fixed a heading that implied Iowa requires you to identify yourself on request.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected an FAQ answer to state that Riley v. California requires a warrant to search the data on a cell phone, not to seize the phone itself.
Corrected the docket number in the Robbins v. City of Des Moines citation, clarified that the case arose on a public sidewalk next to (not inside) the Des Moines Police Station, and added the more recent controlling Eighth Circuit case, Molina v. Book (2023), on when a First Amendment right to record police is clearly established.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Iowa Code, Chapter 808B: INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS
§ 808B.2Unlawful acts — penalty.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
1. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, a person who does any of the following commits a class “D” felony: a. Willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, a wire, oral, or electronic communication. b. Willfully uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use an electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when either of the following applies: (1) The device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication. (2) The device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of radio communications. c. Willfully discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of a wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection. d.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Iowa courts have applied 808B.2 to covert recordings by private parties. State v. Spencer (2007) read its one-party consent exception to include vicarious consent, but only where a parent has a good faith, objectively reasonable basis for consenting for a minor child. Papillon v. Jones (2017) applied it to a hidden home recorder.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Brenda Papillon v. Bryon Jones (Supreme Court of Iowa 2017)✓A man left a hidden voice-activated recorder in his ex-girlfriend's home and captured her private phone calls, then used them in their custody case; the court affirmed liability under Section 808B.2 but held punitive damages require proof he knew he was violating the chapter.
- Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of Iowa (Supreme Court of Iowa 2009, 763 N.W.2d 250)✓A nonmember hid a recorder in a fraternity's private meeting room and gave the tape to university officials who used it to discipline the chapter; the court held the tape was a protected oral communication and read "willfully" in Section 808B.2 to mean purposeful conduct.
- State v. Spencer (Supreme Court of Iowa 2007, 737 N.W.2d 124)✓A father secretly taped his 13-year-old daughter's calls with her teacher after suspecting sexual abuse; the court read Section 808B.2(2)(c)'s consent exception to include vicarious consent, letting a parent consent for a minor on a good-faith, objectively reasonable basis.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Iowa Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), Iowa Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Iowa Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
Iowa Code, Chapter 21: OFFICIAL MEETINGS OPEN TO PUBLIC
§ 21.5Closed session.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. A governmental body may hold a closed session only by affirmative public vote of either two-thirds of the members of the body or all of the members present at the meeting. A governmental body may hold a closed session only to the extent a closed session is necessary for any of the following reasons: a. To review or discuss records which are required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a condition for that governmental body’s possession or continued receipt of federal funds. b. To discuss application for letters patent. c. To discuss strategy with counsel in matters that are presently in litigation or where litigation is imminent where its disclosure would be likely to prejudice or disadvantage the position of the governmental body in that litigation. d. To discuss the contents of a licensing examination or whether to initiate licensee disciplinary investigations or proceedings if the governmental body is a licensing or examining board. e.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Botsko v. Davenport Civil Rights Commission (Supreme Court of Iowa 2009, 774 N.W.2d 841)“…Nabb counters that the closed sessions were authorized by Iowa Code section 21.5(1)(/). This section of the Open Meeting…”
- Mark D. Hall v. Broadlawns Medical Center (Supreme Court of Iowa 2012, 811 N.W.2d 478)“…subject to disclosure under the public records act. See Iowa Code § 21.5(4) (stating the minutes of a closed se…”
- KCOB/KLVN, Inc. v. Jasper County Board of Supervisors (Supreme Court of Iowa 1991, 473 N.W.2d 171)“…e and the reason for the closed session, all as required in Iowa Code Section 21.5.” Plaintiffs maintain that the court in…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Iowa Laws on Recording in Public: First Amendment Rights and Limits (2026)
Iowa Code, Chapter 321: MOTOR VEHICLES AND LAW OF THE ROAD
§ 321.174Operators licensed — operation of commercial motor vehicles.In force
1. A person, except those expressly exempted, shall not operate any motor vehicle upon a highway in this state unless the person has a driver’s license issued by the department valid for the vehicle’s operation. 2. a. A person operating a commercial motor vehicle shall not have more than one driver’s license. A nonresident may operate a commercial motor vehicle in Iowa if the nonresident has been issued a license by another state, a nonresident commercial driver’s license or nonresident commercial learner’s permit, or a driver’s license issued by a foreign jurisdiction which the federal highway administration has determined to be issued in conformity with the federal commercial driver testing and licensing standards, if the license, commercial driver’s license, commercial learner’s permit, or driver’s license is valid for the vehicle operated. b. A person who operates a commercial motor vehicle upon the highways of this state without having been issued a driver’s license valid for the vehicle operated commits a simple misdemeanor. c.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Iowa v. Jayel Antrone Coleman (Supreme Court of Iowa 2017)“…carry and display upon an officer’s request. Id.; see also Iowa Code § 321.174(3) (2013) (“A licensee shall have the…”
- Kolbe v. State (Supreme Court of Iowa 2001, 625 N.W.2d 721)“…d (8) expiration and renewal of licenses. See Iowa Code §§ 321.174 -.200. These provisions clearly suggest…”
- State v. Snyder (Supreme Court of Iowa 2001, 634 N.W.2d 613)“…apply to him because he was driving on his own property and Iowa Code section 321.174(1) requires a driver’s license only whe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Iowa Code, Chapter 719: OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE
§ 719.1Interference with official acts.In force
1. a. A person commits interference with official acts when the person knowingly resists or obstructs anyone known by the person to be a peace officer, jailer, emergency medical care provider under chapter 147A, medical examiner, or fire fighter, whether paid or volunteer, or a person performing bailiff duties pursuant to section 602.1303, subsection 3, in the performance of any act which is within the scope of the lawful duty or authority of that officer, jailer, emergency medical care provider under chapter 147A, medical examiner, or fire fighter, whether paid or volunteer, or a person performing bailiff duties pursuant to section 602.1303, subsection 3, or who knowingly resists or obstructs the service or execution by any authorized person of any civil or criminal process or order of any court. b. Interference with official acts is a simple misdemeanor. In addition to any other penalties, the punishment imposed under this paragraph shall include assessment of a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars. c. If a person commits interference with official acts, as defined in this subsection, which results in bodily injury, the person commits a serious misdemeanor. d.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 122 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Of Iowa Vs. Colby Alan Palmer (Supreme Court of Iowa 2010, 791 N.W.2d 840)“…ing or attempting to inflict bodily injury in violation of Iowa Code section 719.1(2) (2007), a class “D” felony; and (2)…”
- State v. Legg (Supreme Court of Iowa 2001, 633 N.W.2d 763)“…he scope of the lawful duty or authority of that officer.” Iowa Code § 719.1 . Legg’s conduct in speeding up her car…”
- State v. Buchanan (Supreme Court of Iowa 1996, 549 N.W.2d 291)“…f the crime of interference with official acts while armed, Iowa Code section 719.1 (1995), requires proof the defendant…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 42
§ 1983Civil action for deprivation of rightsIn forcecited in 52 of our articles
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 282,365 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal (Supreme Court of the United States 2009, 556 U.S. 662)“…its brought against state officials under Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U. S. C. §1983.” Hartman, 547 U. S., at 254, n. 2. Cf.…”
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett (Supreme Court of the United States 1986, 477 U.S. 317)“…policeman as she left. Petitioner brought an action under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 claiming that the refusal of service a…”
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs. (Supreme Court of the United States 1978, 436 U.S. 658)“…decided less than two decades ago. Focusing new light on 42 U. S. C. § 1983 , that decision widened access to the f…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: 11th Circuit Voids Notice Before Eviction Deposit Forfeiture, Florida Man Sues Police Over Facial Recognition Arrest (2026), Tenth Circuit Affirms Club Q Dismissals Under Colorado's CPLA
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Iowa Code, Chapter 22: EXAMINATION OF PUBLIC RECORDS § 22.1 (Definitions.) · Iowa Code, Chapter 21: OFFICIAL MEETINGS OPEN TO PUBLIC § 21.1 (Intent — declaration of policy.)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- Iowa Code 808B.2 - Unlawful Acts and Penalty(legis.iowa.gov).gov
- Iowa Code Chapter 21 - Open Meetings(legis.iowa.gov).gov
- Iowa Code Chapter 22 - Open Records (Public Records)(legis.iowa.gov).gov
- Iowa Code 719.1 - Interference With Official Acts(legis.iowa.gov).gov
- Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014)(supremecourt.gov).gov
- Robbins v. City of Des Moines, 984 F.3d 673 (8th Cir. 2021)(courtlistener.com)
- 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights(law.cornell.edu)
- ACLU of Iowa - Taking Photos or Videos in Iowa(aclu-ia.org)
- Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023)(courtlistener.com)