EnglishEspañol
New Hampshire flag

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Phone Call Recording Laws

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Hampshire Phone Call Recording Laws

Updates

Corrected an earlier changelog entry that described a cross-reference not present on the page.

Explained that a caller who records while knowing, or recklessly ignoring, New Hampshire's all-party rule faces the felony (State v. Mueller), corrected the statutory definition of telecommunication and the count of one-party states, limited the disclosure felony to felony recordings, and presented notice-as-consent and the law governing interstate calls as unsettled. Corrected the business section to say federal law does not override New Hampshire's all-party rule and that whether that rule reaches calls recorded in another state is not settled, and clarified that a recording announcement alone may not be consent.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected our description of State v. Clark: the felony and misdemeanor tiers come from RSA 570-A:2 itself, and Clark held that recordings are suppressed under RSA 570-A:6 only for felony violations; we removed an unverified description of a 2025 case.

Corrected the neighboring-state comparison table: Vermont has no wiretapping statute (its one-party default comes from case law and the federal floor), replacing a fabricated statute citation. Also fixed the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date to May 19, 2025.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the participant phone-call recording misdemeanor to state RSA 625:9's Class-B-by-default rule (no jail, up to $1,200) instead of presenting the Class A figures (1 year, $2,000) as the flat maximum.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Propagated State v. Clark (2024 N.H. 64, Nov. 13, 2024) and State v. Hersom (No. 2023-0352, Jan. 24, 2025) two-tier suppression framework from parent hub; confirmed RSA 570-A:2, I-a misdemeanor framing; RSA 105-D body cam reference added where applicable.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. RSA 570-A:2 - Interception Prohibited(gc.nh.gov).gov
  2. RSA 570-A:1 - Definitions(gc.nh.gov).gov
  3. RSA 570-A:11 - Civil Damages(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
  4. RSA 570-A:6 - Evidence Suppression(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
  5. RSA 651:2 - Sentences(gc.nh.gov).gov
  6. FCC Recording Guide(fcc.gov).gov
  7. State v. Clark 2024(courts.nh.gov).gov
  8. State v. Hersom 2025(courts.nh.gov).gov
  9. RSA Chapter 570-A - Wiretapping and Eavesdropping (Full Chapter)(gc.nh.gov).gov
  10. RSA 625:9 - Classification of Crimes(gc.nh.gov).gov
Share: