California
California Car Seat Laws (2026): Ages, Airbags & Fines
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

California requires every child under 8 to ride in the rear seat in an age-appropriate restraint system, with a rear-facing seat mandatory under age 2 unless the child already weighs 40 pounds or is 40 inches tall, under Cal. Veh. Code §§ 27360 and 27363. This page reflects the statute's text as of September 2026.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers car seat and child-restraint law in the state of California only. It does not address any other state. For other states, see the car seat laws hub.
| Stage | Applies until | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Restraint system, rear seat | Under 8 years old | Cal. Veh. Code § 27360(a) |
| Rear-facing specifically | Under 2, unless already 40 lb or 40 in | Cal. Veh. Code § 27360(b) |
| Seat belt allowed instead of restraint | Under 8 and 4'9" or taller | Cal. Veh. Code § 27363(d) |
Under 8: rear seat, appropriate restraint system
Section 27360(a) sets California's baseline: "a parent, legal guardian, or driver who transports a child under eight years of age...shall properly secure that child in a rear seat in an appropriate child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards." That duty runs until age 8, subject to the exceptions in § 27363 described below.

Under 2: rear-facing, with an early exit at 40 pounds or 40 inches
Within that under-8 requirement, § 27360(b) narrows the rule for the youngest children: a child under 2 must ride "in a rear-facing child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, unless the child weighs 40 or more pounds or is 40 or more inches tall." Reaching either number, weight or height, lets a child move out of the rear-facing-specific requirement even before turning 2, though the broader under-8 restraint-system duty in (a) still applies.
4'9" or taller: a seat belt can substitute for a restraint system
Section 27363(d) provides that "a child or ward under eight years of age who is four feet nine inches in height or taller may be properly restrained by a safety belt...rather than by a child passenger restraint system." This is a height-only exception; a child's age and weight don't affect it once the 4'9" mark is reached.
Front seat and airbags: a narrower rule than commonly assumed
California does not flatly bar every child under 8 from the front seat. Section 27363(e) allows a child under 8 to ride in front under any of six circumstances: no rear seat exists, the rear seats are side-facing or rear-facing, the restraint system can't be installed properly in the rear, all rear seats are already occupied by children 7 or younger, or a medical necessity applies. None of those six turns on whether an airbag is present. The airbag-specific rule, § 27363(f), is narrower still: it prohibits only a rear-facing restraint system from being placed in the front seat of a vehicle with an active passenger-side frontal airbag. A forward-facing restraint or a booster placed in the front seat under one of the (e) circumstances remains lawful even with an active airbag.
Lap belt alone in the back seat
A child weighing more than 40 pounds may ride in the back seat with only a lap belt, not a combination lap-and-shoulder belt, if the back seat in question isn't equipped with a lap-and-shoulder combination, under Cal. Veh. Code § 27363(c).
Exemptions
Section 27363(b) allows transporting a child without a restraint system, using a seat belt instead, "in case of a life-threatening emergency, or when a child is being transported in an authorized emergency vehicle," if no restraint system is available. Section 27363(a) lets a court exempt a class of children by age, weight, or size if a restraint system would be impractical because of "physical unfitness, medical condition, or size." And § 27360(c) provides that the restraint requirement "does not apply to a driver if the parent or legal guardian of the child is a passenger in the motor vehicle."

Penalty
Under Veh. Code § 27360.6(a)(1), a first offense is "punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100)," and under (b)(1), a second or later conviction is "punishable by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250)." Both fines can be reduced or waived if the driver establishes that they are economically disadvantaged and the court refers them to a community education program; the waiver is conditional on that showing, not automatically available and not flatly unavailable either.
Leaving a child unattended: Vehicle Code § 15620
California has a dedicated unattended-child statute, Veh. Code § 15620, separate from the restraint law above. It applies to a child 6 or younger left inside a vehicle without a supervisor age 12 or older, when either the surrounding conditions present a significant risk to the child's health or safety, or the vehicle's engine is running or the keys are in the ignition. A violation is an infraction carrying a $100 fine, reducible or waivable under the same economic-hardship-plus-education-program path as the restraint penalty above. The statute doesn't preclude a separate prosecution under Penal Code § 192 (manslaughter) or § 273a (child endangerment) if the child is actually injured.
A 2027 change is coming to § 27363
The current text of § 27363 carries its own sunset clause: "This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed." Stats. 2025, Ch. 434, Sec. 8 enacts a later operative version of § 27363, effective that same date, January 1, 2027 (see the leginfo enactment note for § 27363, cited below). This page describes the version of § 27363 in effect through December 31, 2026. Everything above about § 27363 describes only the text in effect through that date; readers who need the rule as it stands on or after January 1, 2027 should check the current statute directly.
Federal guidance vs. California law
The federal standard for car seats as products, FMVSS 213 (49 CFR 571.213), sets construction and crash-test requirements a seat must meet to be sold; it does not dictate how a California parent must use the seat. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the American Academy of Pediatrics separately recommend keeping a child rear-facing as long as the seat's own height and weight limits allow, which in practice can extend well past California's under-2/40-pound-or-40-inch statutory floor. That recommendation is safety guidance, not a legal requirement; California's own age, weight, and height thresholds in §§ 27360 and 27363 are what the law requires.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about California's car seat law as of September 2026. It is not legal advice. Statutes, exemptions, and penalties change, including the amendment to § 27363 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 434, Sec. 8) taking effect January 1, 2027; verify the current text of the law before relying on it, and talk to a lawyer licensed in California about a specific situation.
Related California traffic law pages
Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of 2026-09-17. Last updated: 2026-09-17.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a child face forward in California?
The rear-facing-specific requirement in Cal. Veh. Code § 27360(b) ends once a child turns 2 or, earlier, once the child weighs 40 pounds or more or is 40 inches or taller, whichever happens first. The broader under-8 restraint-system requirement in § 27360(a) still applies after that.
Can a child under 8 ride in the front seat in California?
Yes, if one of six circumstances in § 27363(e) applies, such as no rear seat, all rear seats occupied by children 7 or under, or a medical necessity. A separate, narrower rule bars only a rear-facing restraint from the front seat when an active passenger airbag is present.
What is the fine for a car seat violation in California?
A first offense is $100 and a second or later offense is $250 under Veh. Code § 27360.6, but a court can reduce or waive either fine if the driver is economically disadvantaged and completes a community education program.
Is it illegal to leave a young child alone in a car in California?
Yes, for a child 6 or younger left without a supervisor 12 or older, if there's a significant safety risk or the engine is running or the keys are in the ignition, under Veh. Code § 15620. It's an infraction with a $100 fine, reducible under the same hardship-plus-education path as the restraint penalty.
Is California's car seat law changing in 2027?
Yes. The current § 27363 repeals itself on January 1, 2027, and Stats. 2025, Ch. 434, Sec. 8 enacts the replacement text effective that same date. This page describes the law as it stands through December 31, 2026; check the current statute directly for the rule effective on or after January 1, 2027.
Updates
Rebuilt from the current statute text after an independent review: restraint stages, exemptions, front-seat rules and penalties re-verified against the statute.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected California's unattended-child rule: the law covers children 6 years of age or younger (not just those under 6), and it only prohibits leaving them unattended when there is a significant safety risk or the engine is running/keys are in the ignition, rather than an unconditional ban.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the rear-facing exit rule to the statute's 40 inches OR 40 pounds threshold (Veh. Code 27360, not 27363), removed a fabricated 65-pound booster-graduation figure, and fixed the taxi section which had picked up Arkansas's under-6/under-60lb rule instead of California's own under-8 rule.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Vehicle Code
§ 27360In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in Section 27363, a parent, legal guardian, or driver who transports a child under eight years of age on a highway in a motor vehicle, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 27315, shall properly secure that child in a rear seat in an appropriate child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards. (b) Except as provided in Section 27363, a parent, legal guardian, or driver who transports a child under two years of age on a highway in a motor vehicle, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 27315, shall properly secure the child in a rear-facing child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, unless the child weighs 40 or more pounds or is 40 or more inches tall. The child shall be secured in a manner that complies with the height and weight limits specified by the manufacturer of the child passenger restraint system. (c) This section does not apply to a driver if the parent or legal guardian of the child is a passenger in the motor vehicle. (d) This section shall become operative January 1, 2017.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-09 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Thomas (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California 1984, 159 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 18)“…as appeals from the judgment of conviction for violation of Vehicle Code section 27360, subdivision (a) (failure to secure chi…”
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. William C. (California Supreme Court 2012, 54 Cal. 4th 610)“…el represents that William recently admitted a violation of Vehicle Code section 27360, subdivision (a) (transporting a young…”
- Chavez v. Glock, Inc. (California Court of Appeal 2012, 207 Cal. App. 4th 1283)“…now Pen. Code, § 25100) (unlawful storage of a firearm) and Vehicle Code section 27360 (failure to properly secure child in ca…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Car Seat Laws by State 2026: Rear-Facing, Booster, Front Seat Rules
§ 27363In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The court may exempt from the requirements of this article any class of child by age, weight, or size if it is determined that the use of a child passenger restraint system would be impractical by reason of physical unfitness, medical condition, or size. The court may require satisfactory proof of the child’s physical unfitness, medical condition, or size and that an appropriate special needs child passenger restraint system is not available. (b) In case of a life-threatening emergency, or when a child is being transported in an authorized emergency vehicle, if there is no child passenger restraint system available, a child may be transported without the use of that system, but the child shall be secured by a seatbelt. (c) A child weighing more than 40 pounds may be transported in the backseat of a vehicle while wearing only a lap safety belt when the backseat of the vehicle is not equipped with a combination lap and shoulder safety belt.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Tonies CA3 (California Court of Appeal 2022)“…system. The court noted two relevant exceptions provided by Vehicle Code section 27363: (1) a child who weighs more than 40 po…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 27360.6In force
(a) (1) For a conviction under Section 27360 or 27360.5, a first offense is punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100), except that the court may reduce or waive the fine if the defendant establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he or she is economically disadvantaged, and the court, instead, refers the defendant to a community education program that includes, but is not limited to, education on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system for children of all ages, and provides certification to the court of completion of that program. Upon completion of the program, the defendant shall provide proof of participation in the program. If an education program on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system is not available within 50 miles of the residence of the defendant, the requirement to participate in that program shall be waived. If the fine is paid, waived, or reduced, the court shall report the conviction to the department pursuant to Section 1803.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
§ 15620In force
(a) A parent, legal guardian, or other person responsible for a child who is 6 years of age or younger may not leave that child inside a motor vehicle without being subject to the supervision of a person who is 12 years of age or older, under either of the following circumstances: (1) Where there are conditions that present a significant risk to the child’s health or safety. (2) When the vehicle’s engine is running or the vehicle’s keys are in the ignition, or both. (b) A violation of subdivision (a) is an infraction punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100), except that the court may reduce or waive the fine if the defendant establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he or she is economically disadvantaged and the court, instead, refers the defendant to a community education program that includes education on the dangers of leaving young children unattended in motor vehicles, and provides certification of completion of that program. Upon completion of that program, the defendant shall provide that certification to the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 571.213Child restraint systems; Applicable unless a vehicle or child restraint system is certified to § 571.213b.In forcecited in 51 of our articles
S1. Scope. This standard specifies requirements for child restraint systems used in motor vehicles and aircraft. S2. Purpose. The purpose of this standard is to reduce the number of children killed or injured in motor vehicle crashes and in aircraft. S3. Application. This standard applies to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks and buses, and to child restraint systems for use in motor vehicles and aircraft, manufactured before December 5, 2026. FMVSS No. 213b applies to child restraint systems manufactured on or after December 5, 2026. S4. Definitions. Add-on child restraint system means any portable child restraint system. Backless child restraint system means a child restraint, other than a belt-positioning seat, that consists of a seating platform that does not extend up to provide a cushion for the child's back or head and has a structural element designed to restrain forward motion of the child's torso in a forward impact.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Welsh Ex Rel. Welsh v. Century Products, Inc. (District Court, D. Maryland 1990, 745 F. Supp. 313)“…afety Act”) and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 213, 49 C.F.R. § 571.213 (1989) (“FMVSS 213”). In particular, C…”
- Hendrix Ex Rel. Gp v. Evenflo Co., Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2010, 609 F.3d 1183)“…meets the requirements imposed by federal regulations. See 49 C.F.R. § 571.213. When used properly, the base is positio…”
- Hendrix v. Evenflo Co. (District Court, N.D. Florida 2009, 255 F.R.D. 568)“…ance requirements and a testing procedure for CRS modules. 49 C.F.R. § 571.213 . Van Arsdell’s mechanical engineering…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Car Seat Laws (2026): Ages, Stages & Penalties, Alaska Car Seat Laws (2026): 5 Stages & Penalties, Arizona Car Seat Laws (2026): Booster Age & Penalty Rules
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Cal. Veh. Code § 27360, Child passenger restraint system required(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Veh. Code § 27363, Exceptions and front seat placement(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Veh. Code § 27360.6, Penalty for violation(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Veh. Code § 15620, Leaving a child unattended in a motor vehicle(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- 49 CFR § 571.213, FMVSS No. 213, Child restraint systems(ecfr.gov).gov
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Car Safety Seats: Information for Families(healthychildren.org)