Nevada Phone Call Recording Laws: All-Party Consent Required (2026)

Nevada requires all-party consent to record phone calls under NRS 200.620. The statute allows one-party interception only in an emergency and with court ratification, and the Nevada Supreme Court ruled in Lane v. Allstate (1998), and restated without dissent in Ditech Financial v. Buckles (2017), that every participant must agree before a call is recorded. Recording without universal consent is a Category D felony.

Recording phone calls in Nevada is illegal without everyone's consent. This is the single most important rule you need to know about Nevada recording laws. While Nevada allows you to record in-person conversations you participate in under one-party consent (NRS 200.650), phone calls are governed by a completely different statute, NRS 200.620, which requires every participant to agree.

This guide covers the all-party consent requirement, the case law that established it, what types of communications it covers, the exceptions, and the penalties for violations.

The All-Party Consent Rule for Phone Calls

What NRS 200.620 Says

NRS 200.620 prohibits any person from intercepting or attempting to intercept any wire communication except under a court order or one of its listed exceptions. One party's prior consent is enough only when it is paired with an emergency that makes a court order impractical, and the person who intercepted must then apply to a judge for ratification within 72 hours.

The Nevada Supreme Court read this to bar a party from recording a call without the consent of all parties unless a court approves it. That interpretation has been binding since 1998, and the full court restated it without dissent in 2017.

Lane v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1998): The Foundational Case

The all-party consent requirement was established in Lane v. Allstate Ins. Co., 114 Nev. 1176, 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998), decided December 8, 1998.

Randy Lane, a former Allstate insurance employee, secretly recorded over 700 telephone conversations with coworkers and witnesses to support employment-related claims. Allstate argued the recordings violated NRS 200.620.

The Nevada Supreme Court agreed, though the decision was fractured across four separate opinions rather than a clean majority-versus-dissent split. The lead opinion (joined on this specific point by a separate opinion of two other justices) reasoned that:

1. When a party to a phone call records it, they are "intercepting" the call under the statute
2. The legislature used different consent language for in-person conversations (NRS 200.650, clearly one-party) and wire communications (NRS 200.620)
3. This deliberate difference in language shows the legislature intended different consent standards
4. NRS 200.620 therefore requires all-party consent

Two justices rejected that reading. Chief Justice Springer concurred in the judgment reversing the district court but wrote that he could not agree that it is a crime for one party to tape-record a two-party telephone call, noting that "[o]nly three members of this court can agree as to what the statute means." Justice Rose would have read the statute to reach only public officials and law enforcement. Despite that fracture, the core holding, that NRS 200.620 requires all-party consent to record a phone call, commanded three of the five justices, and in Ditech Financial v. Buckles (2017) the full court restated it without dissent.

Sharpe v. State (2015): A Wiretap Case, Not a Consent Ruling

Sharpe v. State, 350 P.3d 388 (Nev. 2015), is often cited as extending the all-party rule to cell phones and text messages, but that is not what it decided. Sharpe was a criminal appeal about a police wiretap. The Nevada Supreme Court held that cellular telephone calls and text messages are "wire communication[s]" under NRS 179.455, the definition in Nevada's wiretap-order statutes, so a court order could authorize police to intercept them. The opinion does not discuss NRS 200.620, consent, or recording by a private person.

NRS 200.610(2), the definition section that actually governs NRS 200.620 ("as used in NRS 200.610 to 200.690, inclusive"), defines "wire communication" as the transmission of writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds by wire, cable, or other similar connection. NRS 200.610(3) separately defines "radio communication" as transmission by radio or other wireless methods, and NRS 200.620 covers only wire communications. Cell phone calls travel partly by wire and partly by radio, and no Nevada appellate court has applied NRS 200.620 to cell phone calls, VOIP calls, or video calls. The safe course is to get every participant's consent. Text messages are a different matter: Nevada defines "intercept" as aural acquisition (NRS 179.430), and no Nevada law or decision says that saving texts sent to you is an illegal interception.

What Types of Communications Require All-Party Consent

Phone Calls

How Nevada's all-party rule applies by type of communication:

No Nevada court has decided whether NRS 200.620 reaches text messages, and because Nevada defines intercept as aural acquisition (NRS 179.430), keeping texts sent to you is not an established interception. Sharpe v. State (2015) held only that police may intercept texts under a wiretap order; it did not decide whether NRS 200.620 requires every party's consent for texts.

The In-Person vs. Phone Distinction

This is the critical distinction in Nevada law:

The same conversation between the same two people follows different rules depending on whether it happens in person or over the phone. An employee can record an in-person meeting with their boss without telling anyone. That same employee risks a felony by recording a phone call with the same boss without permission.

How to Legally Record Phone Calls in Nevada

Getting Consent

To lawfully record a phone call in Nevada, you must obtain consent from every party before recording begins. Effective methods include:

1. Verbal notification at the start of the call: "I would like to record this call. Is that okay with everyone?"
2. Announcement followed by agreement: Many businesses play a pre-recorded message: "This call may be recorded for quality assurance purposes." That message covers the business's recording, not yours, and no Nevada court has held that staying on the line after it is consent, so ask for a clear yes.
3. Written consent in advance: Parties can agree in writing (such as in a contract) that calls will be recorded.

Implied Consent

No Nevada court has decided whether announcing a recording and having the other person stay on the line counts as consent under NRS 200.620. Because a violation is a felony, ask each person on the call to say yes before you record, and stop if anyone declines.

If a party objects to recording, you must stop recording immediately. Continuing to record after an objection removes any claim of consent and exposes you to felony liability under NRS 200.620.

Recording Voicemails

When someone leaves you a voicemail, they have consented to the recording by voluntarily speaking into your voicemail system. You can save and retain voicemail messages without violating NRS 200.620.

Exceptions to the All-Party Consent Rule

Law Enforcement Court Orders

Under NRS 179.410 through 179.515, law enforcement can intercept phone calls with a court-ordered wiretap. The application must demonstrate probable cause, and a district court judge must approve the order.

Emergency Exception

NRS 200.620(1)(b) allows phone call interception without a court order when:

• An emergency situation exists
• Obtaining a court order is impractical
• The interceptor seeks judicial ratification within 72 hours

If the judge denies ratification, any use or disclosure of the intercepted information is unlawful, and the interceptor must notify the sender and receiver.

Emergency Call Recording (911)

Under NRS 200.620(4), law enforcement and fire-fighting agencies and public utilities may record calls coming in on their emergency lines, and the statute attaches no notice condition to those incoming calls. The notice requirement applies only to calls the agency or utility places in responding to the original call: those may be recorded if it informs the other party that the conversation is being recorded.

Collection Agency Calls

NRS 649.331 provides a specific exception for debtors recording calls from collection agencies. To use this exception:

1. You must be the debtor being contacted
2. You must notify the collection agent at the beginning of the call
3. You must state that the call is being recorded

This exception recognizes that debtors need the ability to document collection practices. It does not extend to other types of business calls.

Service Provider Exception

NRS 200.620(2) allows wire communication service providers to intercept communications for construction, maintenance, or operational purposes. This is a narrow technical exception for telecommunications companies, not a general exception for businesses.

Penalties for Illegally Recording Phone Calls

Criminal Penalties

Under NRS 200.690, recording a phone call without all-party consent is a Category D felony:

Civil Liability

Victims can sue under NRS 200.690 for:

A federal claim under the Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. Section 2520) exists only if the recording also violated federal law, which generally means no party consented; a participant who records their own call usually does not violate federal law. When it applies, a court may award actual damages or statutory damages of $100 a day or $10,000, whichever is greater, plus punitive damages and attorney fees.

Inadmissibility of Evidence

A recording made in violation of NRS 200.620 can be kept out of court. Nevada's wiretap-suppression statute (NRS 179.505) applies in criminal cases, and in Lane v. Allstate the court barred a civil plaintiff from using his illegal recordings as a sanction. Separately, NRS 200.630 bars disclosing the contents of a wire communication unless the sender or receiver authorizes it, so sharing an illegal recording can itself be a crime.

Interstate Phone Calls

Which Law Applies?

Nevada's all-party consent rule does not automatically extend to a call just because a Nevada resident is on the line. In Ditech Financial LLC v. Buckles, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 64 (2017), answering a certified question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, the Nevada Supreme Court held that NRS 200.620 does not apply extraterritorially because interceptions and recordings occur where they are made. The controlling factor is where the recording equipment is located, not merely where the other party happens to be.

If you are recording from inside Nevada, NRS 200.620 applies regardless of where the other party is located. You need every participant's consent, even if the person you are calling is in a one-party state. That outbound requirement is exactly what our recording consent checker confirms for any state you call.

If you are recording from outside Nevada, the law of the state where your recording equipment is located governs, not Nevada's. A caller in a one-party state who records a call to a Nevada resident is generally bound by that state's one-party rule, not NRS 200.620, because the recording did not occur in Nevada.

Neighboring States

Because the location of the recording equipment controls, not the other caller's identity, the safest practice for anyone recording from inside Nevada is to announce the recording and get everyone's consent before substantive discussion begins, regardless of where the other party is located.

Business Compliance

Businesses recording calls from equipment located in Nevada, such as an in-state call center, must comply with the all-party consent standard on every call, regardless of where the other party is located. A multi-state business recording calls from equipment located outside Nevada is instead governed by the law of that location. Because this location-based rule is easy to get wrong across a distributed call center, the safest practice is to default to all-party consent and disclosure on every call.

Phone Call Recording and Common Scenarios

Can I Record a Call With My Landlord?

Not without their consent. Even though you can record an in-person conversation with your landlord under NRS 200.650, a phone call with the same landlord requires all-party consent under NRS 200.620. You must tell your landlord you are recording and get their agreement before pressing record.

Can I Record a Call With My Insurance Company?

Only with their consent. However, many insurance companies already record their calls and play an announcement at the beginning. The company's announcement covers its own recording, not yours. If you also want to record, say so and get the representative's agreement before you start; no Nevada court has held that a mutual announcement alone satisfies NRS 200.620.

Can I Record a Call With a Government Agency?

Not without consent from everyone on the call. Government employees are not exempt from NRS 200.620 protections. If you call a Nevada state agency or local government office, you need their consent to record.

Can I Record Sales Calls or Robocalls?

If you answer a sales call or robocall and the caller does not announce recording, you still need to inform them and get consent before recording your end. However, the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act provides separate protections against unwanted calls.

Phone Recording Apps and Technology

Call Recording Apps

Many smartphone apps offer call recording functionality. Using these apps in Nevada is legal only if you comply with the all-party consent requirement. The app itself is not illegal; using it without universal consent is.

Popular apps like TapeACall, Rev Call Recorder, and Google's built-in call recorder all function the same way under Nevada law: you must get everyone's consent before activating them.

VOIP Platform Recording Features

Platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet have built-in recording features that typically notify all participants when recording begins. No Nevada court has decided whether these platforms are covered by NRS 200.620, or whether a platform notice plus staying on the call counts as consent, so ask participants to agree out loud or in the chat before you record.

Using external screen-recording software or a separate audio recorder to capture such a call without telling the other participants risks violating NRS 200.620, because the Nevada Supreme Court has read that statute to bar recording a call without everyone's consent and no court has excluded internet calls.

More Nevada Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to Nevada Recording Laws

More Nevada Recording Topics

• Nevada Biometric Privacy Laws
• Surveillance Camera Laws

More Nevada Laws

• Nevada AI Meeting Recording Laws
• Nevada Dashcam Laws
• Nevada Data Privacy Laws
• Nevada Deepfake Laws
• Nevada Employee Monitoring Laws
• Nevada GPS Tracking Laws
• Nevada Police Bodycam Laws
• Nevada Smart Glasses Recording Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record a phone call in Nevada?

Only with every participant's consent. NRS 200.620 requires all-party consent for phone calls, as established by the Nevada Supreme Court in Lane v. Allstate (1998). This applies to landline calls. No Nevada appellate court has applied NRS 200.620 to cell calls, VOIP calls, or video calls, so treat them as all-party too. Texts are different: Nevada defines intercept as aural acquisition (NRS 179.430), and no Nevada law or decision treats saving texts sent to you as an interception. Sharpe v. State (2015) is sometimes cited on this point, but it was a police wiretap case that did not address consent. Recording without consent is a Category D felony.

Why does Nevada require all-party consent for phone calls but one-party for in-person?

Nevada has two separate recording statutes. NRS 200.650 covers in-person conversations and clearly allows one-party consent. NRS 200.620 covers wire communications. In Lane v. Allstate (1998), the Nevada Supreme Court held that the different statutory language shows the legislature intended different consent standards for each type of communication.

What happens if I record a phone call without consent in Nevada?

Recording a phone call without all-party consent is a Category D felony under NRS 200.690. Penalties include 1 to 4 years in state prison and fines up to $5,000. The victim can also sue for civil damages of at least $1,000, plus punitive damages and attorney fees. A court can also refuse to let you use the recording, and disclosing its contents can be a separate crime.

Does the all-party consent rule apply to Zoom and FaceTime calls?

Nobody knows yet, so get everyone's consent. No Nevada appellate court has decided whether VOIP or video calls are wire communications under NRS 200.620, and a platform's recording notice is not established consent in Nevada. Sharpe v. State (2015), sometimes cited here, dealt with police wiretaps of cell phone calls and texts, not consent to record.

Can I record a call from a debt collector in Nevada?

Yes, with conditions. NRS 649.331 allows debtors to record calls from collection agencies. You must notify the collector at the beginning of the call and state that you are recording. This exception applies only to collection calls, not other types of business calls.