Georgia
Georgia Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Criminal Penalties (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Georgia criminalizes voyeurism and hidden camera surveillance as felonies. O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(2) bars using any device to record activities in a private place without the consent of all persons observed. The Peeping Tom statute and the voyeurism-by-device statute each add separate felony charges, and prosecutors can stack all three.
Georgia takes voyeurism and hidden camera offenses seriously, classifying them as felonies that carry significant prison time and lasting consequences. Three separate criminal statutes address different forms of invasive surveillance, and a single act of voyeuristic recording can trigger charges under all of them.
This guide covers Georgia's Peeping Tom law, the voyeurism-by-device statute, hidden camera offenses, the relationship between these laws and the general recording statutes, sex offender registration requirements, and how victims can seek justice.
Georgia's Three Voyeurism Statutes
Georgia addresses voyeurism and hidden camera offenses through three overlapping criminal statutes:

| Statute | Offense | Classification | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61 | Peeping Tom | Felony | 1-5 years prison and/or up to $10,000 fine |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) | Recording in private place without consent | Felony | 1-5 years prison and/or up to $10,000 fine |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 | Voyeurism by device (upskirting) | Felony | 1-5 years prison and/or up to $10,000 fine, or a misdemeanor at the judge's discretion |
Each statute targets a different form of invasive surveillance, and prosecutors can charge a defendant under multiple statutes for a single incident.
The Peeping Tom Statute: O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61

What the Law Prohibits
Georgia's Peeping Tom statute makes it unlawful for any person to be a "peeping Tom" on or about the premises of another or to go on or about the premises of another for the purpose of becoming a peeping Tom.
The statute defines a peeping Tom as a person who peeps through windows, doors, or other like places on or about the premises of another for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon, and the doing of any other acts of a similar nature that invade the privacy of such persons.
Elements of the Offense
To secure a conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove:
- The defendant went on or about the premises of another person. This includes approaching or being near someone's home, apartment, hotel room, or other private premises.
- The defendant peered through windows, doors, or similar openings. The statute covers any opening that provides a view into a private space.
- The purpose was to spy upon or invade the privacy of the occupant. Intent matters. Accidentally seeing into someone's window is not a crime. Deliberately positioning yourself to observe someone in private is.
Important Legal Points
- Success is not required. The statute also makes it a crime to go onto another person's property for the purpose of peeping, so the spying need not succeed. The act of going to someone's property with the intent to spy is enough for a conviction. Whether or not the target person was actually visible does not determine guilt.
- Devices. The statute also covers "any other acts of a similar nature" that invade privacy, so it may reach using binoculars or a camera while on someone else's property. We have not found a Georgia decision applying it to a camera or drone, and device-based spying in Georgia is more often charged under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62.
- The statute covers approach and attempt. Going "on or about the premises" for the purpose of becoming a peeping Tom is itself the offense. You do not have to actually look through a window if your purpose in approaching was to do so.
Penalty
Peeping Tom is a felony in Georgia, punishable by imprisonment for 1 to 5 years, a fine of up to $10,000, or both under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-69.
Voyeurism by Device: O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91

What the Law Prohibits
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 targets a specific form of technology-enabled voyeurism. The statute prohibits any person from using any device to surreptitiously photograph or record another person underneath or through the clothing worn by the other person to view the body of or the undergarments worn by the other person without that person's consent.
This statute covers what is commonly called "upskirting" or "downblousing," where someone uses a hidden camera or angled device to capture images underneath or through another person's clothing.
Key Features of the Statute
- Applies in public AND private places. Unlike the general recording statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2)) which focuses on private places, the voyeurism-by-device statute applies wherever the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy under their clothing, "regardless of whether it occurs in a public place." You can be convicted for upskirting someone on a public sidewalk, in a store, at a park, or anywhere else.
- Covers all devices. Smartphones, miniature cameras, modified shoes with cameras, hidden cameras in bags, and any other recording device capable of capturing images.
- Covers both photography and video. Still images and video recordings are both prohibited.
- Consent is a defense. The statute includes "without that person's consent" as an element. If the photographed person consents, there is no violation.
Penalty
Voyeurism by device is a felony carrying:
- 1 to 5 years in prison
- Fine of up to $10,000
- Or both
- Or, at the judge's discretion, a misdemeanor sentence (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91(c))
Hidden Cameras in Private Places: O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2)

The General Recording Prohibition
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) makes it unlawful for any person, through the use of any device, without the consent of all persons observed, to observe, photograph, or record the activities of another which occur in any private place and out of public view.
This is the broadest of Georgia's three voyeurism-related statutes because it covers all forms of hidden camera surveillance in private places, not just sexual or intimate recording.
Common Hidden Camera Scenarios
This statute applies to a wide range of hidden camera situations:
- Hidden cameras in bathrooms. Cameras concealed in bathroom fixtures, vents, or objects
- Hidden cameras in bedrooms. Cameras in guest rooms, hotel rooms, or rental properties
- Hidden cameras in changing rooms. Retail fitting room cameras or gym locker room cameras
- Hidden cameras in workplaces. Cameras in employee bathrooms, changing areas, or private offices without consent
- Hidden cameras in medical facilities. Unauthorized cameras in examination rooms or patient areas
- Hidden cameras in homes by landlords. Cameras placed inside a tenant's private living space
- Nanny cameras without proper limits. Cameras placed in a nanny's designated private spaces (bathroom, bedroom)
Distribution of Hidden Camera Recordings
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(6) creates a separate felony for distributing recordings made in violation of the statute. Selling, giving, or distributing photographs, videotapes, or recordings of activities in private places without all-party consent carries its own penalty of 1 to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
This means that posting hidden camera footage on the internet, sharing it through social media, sending it by text or email, or providing it to any third party constitutes a separate criminal offense.
How Multiple Charges Stack
Charging Under Multiple Statutes
Georgia prosecutors can charge a single act of voyeuristic surveillance under multiple statutes. Consider this scenario: someone places a hidden camera in a hotel bathroom to record guests. That single act could result in:
- Peeping Tom (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61) for going on the premises of another to invade their privacy
- Recording in a private place (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2)) for using a device to record activities in a private place without consent
- Voyeurism by device (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91) if the camera captured images underneath or through clothing
- Distribution (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(6)) if the recordings were shared
Each felony count carries up to 5 years. A judge decides whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively, some counts may merge, and Georgia's general penalty statute allows a fine instead of prison. The upskirting statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91(e)) says its violations do not merge with other crimes. The Peeping Tom count also requires being on the premises "of another," which depends on who placed the camera.
Multiple Victims
Each person recorded without consent can be charged as a separate offense. If a hidden camera recorded 10 different people in a bathroom, the perpetrator could face a separate count of recording in a private place for each person, each punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
Sex Offender Registration
When Registration Is Required
Georgia's voyeurism and hidden-camera statutes (O.C.G.A. §§ 16-11-61, 16-11-62 and 16-11-91) are not on the registry law's list of offenses in O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation maintains the Georgia Sex Offender Registry.
Registration can still follow when hidden-camera conduct involves a minor and is charged as a listed offense, such as sexual exploitation of children under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-100, or falls under the registry law's catch-all for conduct that by its nature is a sexual offense against a minor. Registration carries serious consequences, including:
- Public listing on the sex offender registry
- Residential restrictions (cannot live within a specified distance of schools, childcare facilities, or certain public areas)
- Employment restrictions
- Periodic registration and verification requirements
- Community notification
Registration Duration
Georgia sex offender registration requirements vary based on the offense of conviction and risk level. How long registration lasts depends on the listed offense the person is convicted of, not on a voyeurism statute.
Detecting Hidden Cameras
Physical Inspection
If you suspect hidden cameras in a space where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Check common hiding spots. Smoke detectors, alarm clocks, power outlets, air fresheners, picture frames, stuffed animals, tissue boxes, and toiletry containers are common hiding spots.
- Look for unusual objects. Any object that seems out of place, newly installed, or oddly positioned could conceal a camera.
- Check for small holes. Pinhole cameras can be hidden behind tiny holes in walls, ceilings, or objects.
- Examine light indicators. Some cameras have small LED lights that may be visible in darkness.
Electronic Detection
- RF (Radio Frequency) detectors. These devices scan for wireless signals that hidden cameras use to transmit footage. Many consumer-grade RF detectors are available for under $100.
- Lens finders. These devices use light reflection to locate camera lenses, even tiny pinhole lenses.
- Wi-Fi network scanning. Check available Wi-Fi networks for unfamiliar devices. Some hidden cameras create their own network or connect to the property's Wi-Fi.
- Infrared scanning. Many cameras use infrared LEDs for night vision. Your phone camera may be able to detect these (front cameras on most smartphones can see infrared light).
What to Do If You Find a Hidden Camera
- Do not touch or remove the camera. It is evidence of a crime.
- Photograph the camera's position and surroundings. Document exactly where and how it is placed.
- Call law enforcement immediately. Hidden cameras in private places constitute a felony in Georgia.
- Leave the area if possible. Protect yourself from further recording.
- Preserve any additional evidence. Note the time, date, property address, and any other relevant details.
- Consult an attorney. A lawyer can advise you on both criminal and civil remedies.
Civil Remedies for Victims
Lawsuits Against Perpetrators
Victims of voyeurism and hidden camera offenses in Georgia can pursue civil litigation for:
- Invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion). Georgia recognizes the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, which covers intentional intrusion into someone's private affairs in a manner that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress. The psychological impact of discovering hidden cameras can be severe, and victims can seek damages for emotional suffering.
- Federal Wiretap Act damages. If a hidden device also captured private conversations, 18 U.S.C. § 2520 lets the person recorded sue, and a court may award actual damages or statutory damages of $100 a day or $10,000, whichever is greater, plus punitive damages and attorney fees. It does not cover silent video.
- Punitive damages. Georgia courts can award punitive damages in cases involving willful misconduct, malice, or wantonness.
Injunctive Relief
Courts can issue injunctions ordering:
- Removal and destruction of hidden cameras
- Deletion of all recordings
- Prohibition on further surveillance
- No-contact orders between the perpetrator and victim
Liability of Property Owners
In some cases, property owners (hotels, landlords, Airbnb hosts) who knew about hidden cameras on their property may face an invasion-of-privacy or other claim. Georgia generally does not allow recovery for purely emotional harm on a negligence theory without a physical injury (Lee v. State Farm, 2000), so a claim against a property owner who was merely careless is harder.
Georgia vs. Federal Voyeurism Laws
The Federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act
The federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. § 1801) prohibits photographing or recording the private area of an individual without consent in circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. This federal law applies only within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, such as some military bases and federal enclaves, not all federal property. Most hidden-camera cases in Georgia are prosecuted under state law.
Interstate and Online Distribution
Federal law also comes into play when voyeuristic recordings are distributed across state lines or through the internet. Federal charges can be added to state charges, increasing the total potential penalties.
More Georgia Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Georgia Recording Laws
More Georgia Recording Topics
More Georgia Laws
- Georgia AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Georgia Dashcam Laws
- Georgia Data Privacy Laws
- Georgia Deepfake Laws
- Georgia Employee Monitoring Laws
- Georgia GPS Tracking Laws
- Georgia Police Bodycam Laws
- Georgia Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for hidden cameras in Georgia?
Hidden cameras in private places are a felony in Georgia. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2), recording activities in a private place without all-party consent carries 1 to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. The Peeping Tom statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61) can add another felony charge. A judge decides whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively.
Is upskirting illegal in Georgia?
Yes. O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 specifically prohibits using any device to surreptitiously photograph or record underneath or through someone's clothing. This is a felony carrying 1 to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both, or a misdemeanor sentence at the judge's discretion. It applies wherever the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy under their clothing, in public or private.
Can I be charged as a Peeping Tom in Georgia for using technology?
Possibly. The Peeping Tom statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61) covers peeping on another person's premises and any other acts of a similar nature that invade privacy, so it may reach using binoculars or a camera there, but we have not found a Georgia decision applying it to a camera or drone. Device-based spying is more often charged under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62. The statute also makes it a crime to go onto someone's property for the purpose of peeping, so the spying need not succeed.
Do voyeurism convictions require sex offender registration in Georgia?
Georgia's voyeurism and hidden-camera statutes are not on the registry law's list of offenses in O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12. Registration can still follow when the conduct involves a minor and is charged as a listed offense, such as sexual exploitation of children under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-100, or falls under the catch-all for conduct that by its nature is a sexual offense against a minor. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation maintains the Sex Offender Registry.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in Georgia?
Do not touch or remove the camera. Photograph its position and surroundings as evidence. Call law enforcement immediately because hidden cameras in private places are a felony. Leave the area if possible. Consult an attorney about both criminal prosecution of the perpetrator and your civil remedies for damages.
Updates
Corrected Georgia voyeurism penalty statements to prison, a fine, or both, added the misdemeanor sentencing option under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91(c), and hedged the per-victim count statement.
We corrected the sex offender registration section (Georgia's voyeurism statutes are not listed offenses), the federal Wiretap Act remedy (it does not cover silent video) and the federal voyeurism law's reach, removed an unsupported negligent-distress claim and an unsourced claim that courts apply the Peeping Tom law to cameras and drones, and replaced the "4 to 20 years" stacking example with how sentencing actually works.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Repaired every O.C.G.A. citation link on this page (the prior codifier host, ga.elaws.us, is down sitewide) and fixed an arithmetic error in the stacked-sentencing example (four consecutive 1-5-year felony counts total 4 to 20 years, not 5 to 20).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the distribution-offense citation from O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(4) (which is actually the telephone/telegraph interception paragraph) to the correct § 16-11-62(6) (the paragraph that actually prohibits selling, giving, or distributing recordings of private activities), fixed in both places it appeared: the Distribution of Hidden Camera Recordings section and the multi-charge stacking list.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated
§ 16-11-62Eavesdropping, surveillance, or intercepting communication which invades privacy of another; divulging private message.In forcecited in 25 of our articles
It shall be unlawful for: (1) Any person in a clandestine manner intentionally to overhear, transmit, or record or attempt to overhear, transmit, or record the private conversation of another which shall originate in any private place; (2) Any person, through the use of any device, without the
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 94 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kelley v. State (1998) held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reached a guardian who photographed a nude 16-year-old in the family bathroom, with no exception for family members. Burgeson v. State (1996) held a conversation recorded in a patrol car was not covered, because no reasonable expectation of privacy existed there.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Burgeson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1996, 267 Ga. 102)✓Police secretly recorded two arrestees talking in the back of a patrol car. The court held a police car is much like a jail cell, with no reasonable expectation of privacy, so intercepting that conversation did not offend OCGA 16-11-62 and the tape was admissible.
- Kelley v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1998, 233 Ga. App. 244)✓A guardian photographed her 16-year-old niece nude and passed out in the family bathtub. The court held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reaches any person with no family exception, that the film need not be developed, and that a jury could find the bathroom a private place.
- Dobbins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1992, 262 Ga. 161)“…th the consent of one of the parties to the conversation. OCGA § 16-11-62 (1) provides that: It shall be unlawf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Was the Trump-Raffensperger Call Recording Legal Under Georgia Law?, Georgia Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Georgia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Audio, All-Party Video
§ 16-11-61Peeping Toms.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to be a "peeping Tom" on or about the premises of another or to go about or upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming a "peeping Tom." (b) As used in this Code section, the term "peeping Tom" means a person who peeps through windows or doors,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smith v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1999, 238 Ga. App. 605)“…A jury found Donald Smith guilty of being a “peeping Tom.” OCGA § 16-11-61. His motion for new trial was denied by…”
- In the Interest of J. G. (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1988, 188 Ga. App. 856)“…appellant had committed the delinquent act of peeping Tom, OCGA § 16-11-61, the sole enumeration of error concerns…”
- Rosenthal v. Hudson (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1987, 183 Ga. App. 712)“…ut a warrant for appellee’s arrest for being a peeping Tom (OCGA § 16-11-61). When that warrant was dismissed by a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Restrictions (2026), Georgia Security Camera Laws: Residential and Business Rules (2026), Georgia Video Recording Laws: All-Party Consent in Private Places (2026)
§ 16-11-69Penalty for violations of part.In forcecited in 14 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of Code Section 16-11-66.1, any person violating any of the provisions of this part shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years or a fine not to exceed…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rutter v. Rutter (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2012, 316 Ga. App. 894)“…a penal statute, a violation being punishable as a felony. OCGA § 16-11-69. As such, the rule of lenity is a prope…”
- Prophitt v. the State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2016, 336 Ga. App. 262)“…The crime of invasion of privacy constitutes a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-69, and this Court has previously held tha…”
- Price v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2013, 320 Ga. App. 85)“…rt order. 2 Because Price was convicted of a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-69, and sentenced to five years of confine…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Georgia Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules (2026), Georgia Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules (2026)
§ 16-11-90Prohibition on nude or sexually explicit electronic transmissions.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Harassment" means engaging in conduct directed at a depicted person that is intended to cause substantial emotional harm to the depicted person. (2) "Nudity" means: (A) The showing of the human male or female genitals, pubic area, or buttocks witho
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Somerville v. White (2016) held that this Code section creates no private right of action. The Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed compensatory and punitive damages awarded to a woman whose nude photographs were emailed to her contacts, because a criminal statute enacted after July 1, 2010 must expressly provide a civil remedy.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Somerville v. White (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2016, 337 Ga. App. 414)✓A trial court found a man violated OCGA 16-11-90 by electronically transmitting nude photos of his ex-girlfriend and awarded her $500 plus $15,000 in punitive damages; the court held the criminal statute creates no private right of action and reversed both awards.
- Rogers v. Dupree (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2017, 340 Ga. App. 811)“…based on a defendant’s counterclaim for “Intentional Tort (OCGA § 16-11-90).” Somerville v. White, 337 Ga. App…”
- Joe Rogers, Jr. v. Hylton B. Dupree (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2017)“…based on a defendant’s counterclaim for “Intentional Tort (OCGA § 16-11-90).” Somerville v. White, 337 Ga. App. 41…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia AI Laws and Regulation (2026), Georgia Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Georgia Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
§ 16-11-91Use or installation of device to film underneath or through an individual's clothing under certain circumstances.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Device" means an instrument or apparatus used for observing, photographing, videotaping, recording, or transmitting visual images, including but not limited to a camera, photographic equipment, video equipment, mobile phone, or other similar…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Also relied on in: Georgia School Recording Laws: Student and Parent Rights (2026), Georgia Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 16-11-92Sexual extortion.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Coerce" means: (A) Exposing or threatening to expose any fact or information that if revealed would tend to subject an individual to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or economic harm; (B) Exposing or threatening to expose any photograph or video…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Also relied on in: Georgia Extortion Laws: Theft by Extortion, Sextortion and Penalties
§ 42-1-12State Sexual Offender Registry.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) As used in this article, the term: (1) "Address" means the street or route address of the sexual offender's residence. For purposes of this Code section, the term shall not mean a post office box. (2) "Appropriate official" means: (A) With respect to a sexual offender who is sentenced to prob
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 137 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jenkins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 2008, 284 Ga. 642)“…nces without registering his new address in accordance with OCGA § 42-1-12 as it existed at that time. The trial c…”
- Humphrey v. Wilson (Supreme Court of Georgia 2007, 282 Ga. 520)“…ct to registration as a sex offender. In this regard, under OCGA§ 42-1-12, Wilson would be required, before his r…”
- State v. Davis (Supreme Court of Georgia 2018, 303 Ga. 684)“…s to remove the requirements imposed upon sex offenders by OCGA § 42-1-12 under its constitutional power “to rem…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Age of Consent Laws: Statutes, Penalties and Reporting
United States Code Title 18
§ 1801Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 81 of our articles
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. In this section— the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast; the term “broadcast” means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons; the term “a private area of the individual” means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; the term “female breast” means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; and the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means— circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or circumstances in which a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied 18 U.S.C. 1801 mainly at its edges. United States v. Johnson (2010) read it as Congress's answer to secretly filming nudity on federal property, acquitting on a child exploitation charge instead. EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security (2011) applied the Section 1801(c) law enforcement exception to a TSA scanner claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Helton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 944 F.3d 198)“…from this list of federal offenses is video voyeurism under 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Rather than list this statute as an enu…”
- United States v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2010, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1059)✓A weightlifting coach hid a camera to film minors weighing in nude; acquitting him under the child exploitation statute, the court called that conduct plain video voyeurism under section 1801, but noted the section reaches only federal maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 653 F.3d 1)✓Privacy groups challenged TSA body scanners under the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act; the D.C. Circuit held the statute's exception for lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity applied to airport screening, so the section 1801 claim failed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), California Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026)
§ 2520Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 130 of our articles
Except as provided in section 2511(2)(a)(ii), any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate. In an action under this section, appropriate relief includes— such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; damages under subsection (c) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and a reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 860 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walker v. Darby (1990) held a 2520 plaintiff need not prove the contents of intercepted conversations, only interception and a justified expectation against it. Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) barred 2520 damages against defendants who took no part in the interception, obtained the tape lawfully, and disclosed a matter of public concern.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth Day (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1990, 911 F.2d 1573)✓A postal letter carrier said three supervisors wired an intercom near his workstation to listen in. Reversing summary judgment, the Eleventh Circuit held a section 2520 plaintiff can show interception without proving the contents of specific conversations.
- Gelbard v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 408 U.S. 41)“…disclosure, or use is entitled to recover civil damages, 18 U. S. C. § 2520 . Title III also bars the use as eviden…”
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 503 F.3d 847)“…7 U.S.C. § 605 (e)(4), or alternatively, for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (a), or alternatively, for violations o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?, Federal Wiretap Act and ECPA: The Complete Guide (2026)
Sources and References
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61 - Peeping Tom Statute(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62 - Eavesdropping and Surveillance(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 - Voyeurism by Device(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-90 - NCII / Deepfake (2020 amendment)(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-92 - Sexual Extortion (2021)(law.justia.com)
- Georgia Sex Offender Registry(gbi.georgia.gov).gov
- Georgia SB 539 (2022)(gov.georgia.gov).gov
- TAKE IT DOWN Act (signed May 19, 2025; platform compliance May 19, 2026)(congress.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 1801 - Federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 2520 - Recovery of Civil Damages(law.cornell.edu)
- Georgia Attorney General FAQ on Open Government(law.georgia.gov).gov