EnglishEspañol
Oregon flag

Oregon

Oregon Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights Under Split Consent

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights Under Split Consent

Updates

We updated the NLRB Stericycle note to say the current Board has signaled it may revisit the standard, noted that exceptions can apply to video-meeting recordings, corrected who must consent to a recorded company phone call, and reworded the home-exception and ORS 133.739(3) notes.

We removed an incorrect statutory damages claim (ORS 133.739 covers only court-ordered interception), corrected an FAQ that said employers must disclose monitoring policies, restated the NLRB's Stericycle test accurately, and added the private-meeting and home-recording exceptions for video calls with their limits.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

We corrected this page to state that Oregon's every-participant-informed rule covers work video calls as well as in-person conversations, to describe the full scope of the ORS 165.540(6)(b) video-call exception (including where it may apply to recording harassment), and to explain when a video platform's recording notice can matter under ORS 165.540(6)(a)(C).

Corrected the description of NLRB General Counsel Memorandum GC 25-05: it substantively reinstated the employer-friendly Boeing-era standard for no-recording policies, not a routine housekeeping update, though the Board's underlying Stericycle precedent is unchanged.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected six restatements of a fabricated blanket one-party-consent exemption for workplace video calls; Oregon treats a video call as a conversation requiring all-party notification, and the actual ORS 165.540(6)(b) exception is a narrow evidence-gathering carve-out.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. ORS 165.540 - Obtaining Contents of Communications(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  2. ORS 659A.199 - Oregon Whistleblower Protections(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  3. ORS 163.700 - Invasion of Personal Privacy(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  4. ORS 133.739 - Civil Damages (limited to ORS 133.724 and 133.737 violations)(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  5. National Labor Relations Act(nlrb.gov).gov
  6. Electronic Communications Privacy Act(law.cornell.edu)
Share: