Oregon flag

Oregon

Oregon Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits

Updates

We replaced an absolute statement about officers deleting recordings with the narrower point that officers have no authority to delete them.

We corrected the en banc vote in Project Veritas v. Schmidt to 9-2, clarified that police generally need a warrant to search a phone but may hold it while they get one, replaced an incorrect description of body-camera public-records rules with ORS 192.345(40), and narrowed statements that silent video is always lawful and that qualified immunity is weak in recording cases.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the audio-recording section to rest on ORS 165.540(5)(b), which lets you openly record on-duty officers from a place you lawfully may be, and clarified that police body cameras fall under ORS 165.540(5)(d).

Corrected the descriptions of Fordyce v. Seattle and Askins v. DHS to match what the Ninth Circuit actually decided in each case.

Corrected a KeyTakeaways bullet that inverted Project Veritas v. Schmidt's holding: the case upheld Oregon's all-party notification requirement, it did not create a right to record police, which instead comes from Fordyce v. Seattle and Askins v. DHS.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected three mis-cites of the unconcealed-device exception (KeyTakeaways, body text, and FAQ) from ORS 165.540(2), the telecom-employee/jail-official exception, to the correct ORS 165.540(6)(a).

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. ORS 165.540 - Obtaining Contents of Communications(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  2. ORS 162.247 - Interfering With a Police Officer(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  3. ORS 181A.250 - Law Enforcement Surveillance Limits(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  4. ORS 192.311-478 - Oregon Public Records Law(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  5. Oregon DPSST(oregon.gov).gov
  6. 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights(law.cornell.edu)
  7. Project Veritas v. Schmidt - Ninth Circuit En Banc Opinion(cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov).gov
Share: