EnglishEspañol
Connecticut flag

Connecticut

Connecticut Medical Recording Laws: Patients, Doctors, and HIPAA Rules (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 2, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 2, 2026. · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Connecticut Medical Recording Laws: Patients, Doctors, and HIPAA Rules (2026)

Updates

We corrected the statement that Connecticut has no nursing home camera law: CGS 19a-550b gives nursing home residents a right to in-room audio or video monitoring devices, with door-notice, roommate written-consent and seven-day facility-notice requirements, and we clarified that a family member present in the exam room is outside the eavesdropping statute. Clarified that a family member present at an in-person appointment may record whether or not they join the conversation, and that a telehealth platform's on-screen recording notice does not by itself meet Connecticut's phone-recording consent or notice rule.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected our description of Connecticut's voyeurism statute and hospital camera placement, clarified that no Connecticut statute requires patient consent for in-person quality-assurance or training recordings, and added the notice and tone-warning alternatives that CGS 52-570d allows for recorded phone calls.

Corrected the citation for Connecticut's in-person patient-recording rule (the criminal eavesdropping offense is CGS 53a-189; CGS 53a-187 is only the definitions section it relies on) and clarified that the all-party phone-recording statute, CGS 52-570d, applies by its text to telephonic communications, with video telehealth platforms covered by common practice rather than express statutory language.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected two claims: (1) the voyeurism statute (CGS 53a-189a) requires the camera be used with malice or intent to arouse/satisfy sexual desire, not mere lack of consent; (2) CGS 53a-187 is the eavesdropping definitions section, not itself a 'one-party consent rule' statute — it produces that outcome because a participant's own presence falls outside the offense it defines.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Conn. Gen. Stat. 53a-187 - Eavesdropping Definitions(cga.ct.gov).gov
  2. Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d - Recording of Telephone Communications(cga.ct.gov).gov
  3. Conn. Gen. Stat. 53a-189a - Voyeurism(cga.ct.gov).gov
  4. HIPAA - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(hhs.gov).gov
  5. HHS Office for Civil Rights(hhs.gov).gov
  6. Connecticut Department of Public Health(portal.ct.gov).gov
  7. 42 CFR Part 2 - Substance Abuse Treatment Records(ecfr.gov).gov
  8. Conn. Gen. Stat. 53a-189 - Eavesdropping: Class D Felony(cga.ct.gov).gov
  9. 45 CFR 164.501 - Definitions (health care operations), HIPAA Privacy Rule(ecfr.gov).gov
  10. Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-48b - Use of electronic surveillance devices by employers limited(cga.ct.gov).gov
  11. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-550b (nursing home resident virtual monitoring)(cga.ct.gov).gov
Share: