Maine
Maine Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

To win a slip and fall claim in Maine, you must prove the property owner was negligent by showing the owner knew or should have known about the hazard, failed to fix or warn of it, and that failure caused your injury. Maine applies modified comparative negligence, which reduces or bars recovery depending on your share of fault.
Proving a slip and fall claim in Maine
Maine premises liability law requires a plaintiff to establish that the property owner or occupier owed a duty of care, that a dangerous condition existed on the premises, and that the owner either knew about the hazard or should have discovered it through reasonable inspection. This "notice" element is central: a defendant who had no actual or constructive knowledge of the hazard typically cannot be held liable.
Constructive notice arises when a condition exists long enough that a reasonably prudent owner exercising ordinary care would have discovered and corrected it. Courts look at how visible the hazard was, how long it had been present, and whether the owner had a reasonable inspection routine. If the dangerous condition was caused by the owner's own employees or by a pattern of prior incidents, a court may infer the owner had constructive notice more quickly.
The leading constructive-notice framework in Maine slip and fall cases flows from the general duty of reasonable care owed to invitees (people invited onto premises for business or commercial purposes). Social guests (licensees) are owed a somewhat lesser duty, generally requiring the owner to warn of known dangers that the guest is unlikely to discover. Trespassers, except children under certain circumstances, are owed only the duty to refrain from willful or wanton injury.
Causation must also be proved: the hazard must have actually caused your fall and resulting injuries. A property owner is not an insurer against all accidents on the property; you must link the specific defect to your specific harm.
The open-and-obvious doctrine in Maine
Maine does NOT apply a categorical open-and-obvious "no-duty" rule. The Maine Law Court adopted Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A(1) in Isaacson v. Husson College, 297 A.2d 98 (Me. 1972), which states that a landowner owes no duty for obvious conditions only "unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness." The critical word is "unless."

That means where the owner has reason to foresee that a visitor might still be harmed by the obvious hazard, because the visitor's attention may be distracted, the visitor is required to use that path, or the benefit of encountering the risk outweighs the apparent danger, the owner's duty of reasonable care survives. See Williams v. Boise Cascade Corp., 507 A.2d 576 (Me. 1986); Baker v. Mid-Maine Medical Center, 499 A.2d 464 (Me. 1985); Colvin v. A R Cable Services-ME, Inc., 1997 ME 163; Coffin v. Lariat Associates, 2001 ME 33.
Because open-and-obvious evidence bears on whether harm was foreseeable and on the plaintiff's own comparative fault, these questions are usually submitted to the jury rather than resolved on summary judgment. In practical terms, a visible hazard reduces your odds of winning (the jury may assign you more fault) but it does not automatically end the case.
Ice, snow, and natural accumulation in Maine
Maine takes a duty-to-exercise-ordinary-care approach to ice and snow, and the Law Court has declined to let a business that expects many visitors rely on the "storm in progress" rule that helps property owners in other states.
Under Budzko v. One City Center Associates, 2001 ME 37, 767 A.2d 310, the Law Court held that a commercial possessor who expects significant numbers of invitees must take reasonable steps to keep the premises safe even while a storm is actively ongoing. Such an owner cannot simply wait until the storm ends before taking any action.
To prevail on an ice-or-snow fall claim, a plaintiff must still establish all three notice elements: (1) an accumulation of snow or ice that proximately caused the fall; (2) that the accumulation existed long enough for a reasonably prudent owner to have discovered and remedied or warned of it; and (3) that the defendant knew of the condition and failed to correct it within a reasonable time. These are jury questions in most cases.
Property owners in Maine are well advised to document their snow-removal and salting schedules, because that documentation will be central to any dispute about the "reasonable time" element.
How fault is shared: Maine's negligence rule
Maine follows modified comparative negligence under 14 M.R.S. § 156. Under this system, a plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their own share of fault. A plaintiff who is 25% at fault in a $100,000 case receives $75,000.

The critical threshold is 50%. If a jury finds the plaintiff equally at fault or more than equally at fault (50% or above), recovery is completely barred. This makes Maine a modified-50 (barred at 50%+) state, distinct from pure comparative fault states (like California) that allow partial recovery even at 99% fault.
Maine has a notable procedural quirk: the statute directs the jury to reduce total damages "by dollars and cents, and not by percentage" to the extent the jury thinks just and equitable, rather than through a mechanical percentage calculation. This gives Maine juries somewhat more flexibility than a strict percentage model, but the outcome should be functionally similar in most cases.
Where multiple defendants are responsible, Maine retains joint and several liability. Each defendant is liable for the full judgment, not merely their proportionate share, though special verdict forms allow the jury to allocate percentages among defendants.
Deadlines: statute of limitations and government claims
Maine's statute of limitations for personal injury claims is 6 years from the date the cause of action accrues, under 14 M.R.S. § 752. This is one of the longest PI deadlines in the United States; most states set their SOL at 2 or 3 years. The 6-year period typically begins running on the date of the fall itself, though the "discovery rule" may delay accrual in limited circumstances where the injury was not immediately apparent.
Be aware of important carve-outs. Medical malpractice and professional negligence against health-care providers carries a 3-year period (24 M.R.S. § 2902). Wrongful death actions must be commenced within 3 years after the death, or within 6 years of the date the personal representative discovers the cause of action if the death was caused by a homicide (18-C M.R.S. § 2-807). These shorter deadlines do not typically apply to ordinary slip and fall claims, but they are relevant if you suffered serious injuries requiring hospital care and the health-care provider's conduct is also at issue.
If your fall occurred on government-owned property, the Maine Tort Claims Act requires you to file a written notice of claim within 365 days of the accident under 14 M.R.S. § 8107. This deadline was extended from 180 days effective January 1, 2020, for causes of action accruing on or after that date (P.L. 2019, ch. 214). The notice must substantially comply with the statutory requirements, and no Superior Court action may proceed against a governmental entity or its employees without it. For claims against the State, notice is filed with the responsible agency and the Attorney General; for other governmental entities, notice goes to one of the persons designated in § 8107(3). With so much riding on that notice, ask a Maine injury lawyer in a free consultation who must receive it and how to file it within the 365 days (attorney advertising).
Before counting on a government claim, check whether the entity can be sued at all. Governmental entities in Maine are immune except within the narrow exceptions listed in 14 M.R.S. § 8104-A. A fall inside a municipal building can fall within the public-buildings exception in § 8104-A(2), but that same subsection excludes unimproved land and "land, buildings, structures, facilities or equipment designed for use primarily by the public in connection with public outdoor recreation," which covers most state and municipal parks.
Public ways are excluded too. Section 8104-A(4) provides that a governmental entity "is not liable for any defect, lack of repair or lack of sufficient railing in any highway, town way, sidewalk, parking area, causeway, bridge, airport runway or taxiway or in any appurtenance thereto." A fall caused by a defective public sidewalk therefore usually has no claim against the municipality, although the same subsection does allow claims for negligence in the actual performance of road construction, street cleaning or repair operations.
Missing the 365-day government notice deadline can end a valid claim against a public entity. The 6-year general period does not apply to these claims either: under 14 M.R.S. § 8110, every claim against a governmental entity or its employees "is forever barred from the courts of this State, unless an action therein is begun within 2 years after the cause of action accrues." If you were hurt on public property, act promptly. For more on Maine's statutes of limitations generally, see Maine Statute of Limitations.
What a Maine slip and fall claim is worth
Maine slip and fall settlements and verdicts generally include two categories of damages. Economic damages cover your measurable financial losses: medical bills (emergency care, surgery, physical therapy, future treatment), lost wages and lost earning capacity, and out-of-pocket costs such as transportation to medical appointments or home-care assistance. These are documented and calculated with relative precision.

Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and similar intangible harms. Maine does not cap non-economic damages in general personal injury cases against private defendants, so these awards are set by the jury within the bounds of what is reasonable given the evidence. A claim against a governmental entity is different: 14 M.R.S. § 8105(1) limits "the award of damages, including costs, against either a governmental entity or its employees, or both" to $400,000 "for any and all claims arising out of a single occurrence," however severe the injury.
Your net recovery is then reduced by your percentage of fault under 14 M.R.S. § 156. If you are found 20% at fault, you keep 80% of the total damages. If you are found 50% or more at fault, you receive nothing. That is why documenting the hazard promptly, preserving photographs, gathering witness contact information, and reporting the incident in writing to the property owner matters: your comparative fault percentage will be shaped by this evidence.
The Maine Slip and Fall Settlement Calculator can help you think through the range of economic and non-economic damages before consulting an attorney.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Premises liability law varies by state and changes, and case values depend on the specific facts. For advice about a specific fall, consult a licensed attorney in Maine.
Explore related resources: Slip and Fall Laws by State | Maine Slip and Fall Settlement Calculator | Maine Statute of Limitations
More Maine Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I prove a slip and fall in Maine?
You must prove four elements: (1) the owner owed you a duty of care, (2) a dangerous condition existed on the property, (3) the owner had actual or constructive notice of the hazard and failed to fix or warn of it within a reasonable time, and (4) that failure caused your injury. Constructive notice means the hazard existed long enough that a reasonable owner should have discovered it through ordinary inspection.
Is Maine an open-and-obvious state?
No. Maine does not apply a categorical open-and-obvious bar. The Maine Law Court follows Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A(1), which preserves the landowner's duty of reasonable care whenever harm is foreseeable despite the obvious condition. Obviousness reduces your chance of winning (it is evidence of your own comparative fault) but does not automatically defeat a claim.
Can I sue for falling on ice or snow in Maine?
Yes. Maine imposes a duty of ordinary reasonable care for ice and snow, and under Budzko v. One City Center Associates, 2001 ME 37, a commercial owner expecting many visitors cannot wait until a storm ends before acting; it must take reasonable steps to keep premises safe even during an active storm. You still must prove notice and a reasonable time to remedy.
How long do I have to file a slip and fall lawsuit in Maine?
Maine's general personal injury statute of limitations is 6 years from the date of the accident under 14 M.R.S. § 752, one of the longest in the country. Government claims run on a much shorter clock: if your fall was on government-owned property, you must file a written notice of claim within 365 days under the Maine Tort Claims Act (14 M.R.S. § 8107) and begin the lawsuit itself within 2 years under 14 M.R.S. § 8110, not 6. Many government landowners are also immune outright under 14 M.R.S. § 8104-A, including for defects and lack of repair in highways and sidewalks.
Can I recover if I was partly at fault for my fall in Maine?
Yes, as long as your share of fault is less than 50%. Maine applies modified comparative negligence under 14 M.R.S. § 156. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. If you are found 50% or more at fault, recovery is completely barred. For example, if you are 30% at fault in a $100,000 case, you recover $70,000.
How much is a Maine slip and fall claim worth?
Value depends on your economic losses (medical bills, lost wages, future care costs) plus non-economic damages (pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life). Maine does not cap non-economic damages in general PI cases against private defendants, but a claim against a governmental entity is capped at $400,000 for any and all claims arising out of a single occurrence under 14 M.R.S. § 8105(1). Your net recovery is reduced by your comparative fault percentage. Use the Maine Slip and Fall Settlement Calculator to estimate a range, then consult an attorney for a case-specific assessment.
Updates
Corrected the description of Budzko v. One City Center Associates to what the Law Court held: a business expecting significant numbers of visitors must act reasonably during a winter storm and cannot wait for it to end; the case did not address a natural-accumulation defense.
Corrected the wrongful death deadline to 3 years (6 years for a homicide) and added the Maine Tort Claims Act rules the page was missing for falls on government property: the 2-year deadline to file suit, the immunity covering sidewalks, highways and public recreation land, and the $400,000 cap on damages.
Corrected the Budzko v. One City Center Associates case citation link, which was pointing to the Maine Tort Claims Act notice statute instead of the opinion; the underlying legal statement was already accurate.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL, Part 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS, Chapter 7: DEFENSES GENERALLY
§ 156Comparative negligenceIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
When any person suffers death or damage as a result partly of that person's own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons, a claim in respect of that death or damage may not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect thereof must be reduced to such extent as the jury thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage. [PL 1999, c. 633, §1 (AMD); PL 1999, c. 633, §3 (AFF).] When damages are recoverable by any person by virtue of this section, subject to such reduction as is mentioned, the court shall instruct the jury to find and record the total damages that would have been recoverable if the claimant had not been at fault, and further instruct the jury to reduce the total damages by dollars and cents, and not by percentage, to the extent considered just and equitable, having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damages, and instruct the jury to return both amounts with the knowledge that the lesser figure is the final verdict in the case. [PL 1999, c. 633, §1 (AMD); PL 1999, c.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 132 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1984, 471 A.2d 280)“…aine law: Is Maine’s comparative negligence statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 [1980], applicable to plaintiff’s claim…”
- Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2000, 748 A.2d 961)“…give rise to the defense of contributory negligence. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 (1980). If the plaintiff's fault is equ…”
- Pelletier v. Fort Kent Golf Club (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1995, 662 A.2d 220)“…use the damage award to Jeannine violates the provisions of 14 M.R.S.A. § 156 (1980) and the jury’s failure to award…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Medical Malpractice Laws in Maine (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Maine Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL, Part 2: PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL, Chapter 205: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
§ 752Six yearsIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
All civil actions shall be commenced within 6 years after the cause of action accrues and not afterwards, except actions on a judgment or decree of any court of record of the United States, or of any state, or of a justice of the peace in this State, and except as otherwise specially provided.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 286 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McAfee v. Cole (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1994, 637 A.2d 463)“…general six-year limitations period for all civil actions, 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (1980). After the order of dismissal, M…”
- Myrick v. James (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1982, 444 A.2d 987)“…om the purview of the general six year limitations statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 752, and situated them in a position simila…”
- Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2005, 871 A.2d 1208)“…tends that the six-year statute of limitations set forth in 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (2003) applies to this case. The Dioces…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Maine (2026): Deadlines & Helmets, Truck Accident Laws in Maine (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL, Part 7: PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS, Chapter 741: TORT CLAIMS
§ 8107Notice to governmental entityIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
1. Notice requirements for filing. Within 365 days after any claim or cause of action permitted by this chapter accrues, or at a later time within the limits of section 8110, when a claimant shows good cause why notice could not have reasonably been filed within the 365-day limit, a claimant or a claimant's personal representative or attorney shall file a written notice containing: A. The name and address of the claimant, and the name and address of the claimant's attorney or other representative, if any; [PL 1989, c. 327 (AMD).] B. A concise statement of the basis of the claim, including the date, time, place and circumstances of the act, omission or occurrence complained of; [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] C. The name and address of any governmental employee involved, if known; [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] D. A concise statement of the nature and extent of the injury claimed to have been suffered; and [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] E. A statement of the amount of monetary damages claimed. [PL 1977, c. 2, §2 (NEW).] 2. Incapacity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 100 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1987, 535 A.2d 421)“…orney General notice pursuant to the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107 (1980), of a claim against AMHI, Commis…”
- Beaulieu v. the Aube Corp. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2002, 796 A.2d 683)“…period was modeled after the Maine Tort Claims Act (MTCA), 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107. 7 Report of a Study by th…”
- Heber v. Lucerne-In-Maine Village Corp. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2000, 2000 Me. 137)“…to follow the MTCA’s notice requirements. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107. These arguments are not persuasive.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 8104-AExceptions to immunityIn force
Except as specified in section 8104‑B, a governmental entity is liable for property damage, bodily injury or death in the following instances. [PL 1987, c. 740, §4 (NEW).] 1. Ownership; maintenance or use of vehicles, machinery and equipment. A governmental entity is liable for its negligent acts or omissions in its ownership, maintenance or use of any: A. Motor vehicle, as defined in Title 29‑A, section 101, subsection 42; [PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. A, §43 (AMD); PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. A, §153 (AFF); PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. C, §15 (AFF).] B. Special mobile equipment, as defined in Title 29‑A, section 101, subsection 70; [PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. A, §43 (AMD); PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. A, §153 (AFF); PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. C, §15 (AFF).] C. Trailers, as defined in Title 29‑A, section 101, subsection 86; [PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. A, §43 (AMD); PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. A, §153 (AFF); PL 1995, c. 65, Pt. C, §15 (AFF).] D. Aircraft, as defined in Title 6, section 3, subsection 5; [PL 1987, c. 740, §4 (NEW).] E. Watercraft, as defined in Title 12, section 1872, subsection 14; [PL 1997, c. 678, §18 (AMD).] F. Snowmobiles, as defined in Title 12, section 13001, subsection 25; and [PL 2003, c. 414, Pt.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 104 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lightfoot v. School Administrative District No. 35 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2003, 816 A.2d 63)“…titutes the operation of a public building and, pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 8104-A(2) (Pamph.2002) of the Maine Tort Claim…”
- New Orleans Tanker Corp. v. Department of Transportation (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1999, 728 A.2d 673)“…(Million Dollar Bridge) falls within a statutory exception, 14 M.R.S.A. § 8104-A, to general governmental immunity provi…”
- Tolliver v. Department of Transportation (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2008, 948 A.2d 1223)“…rmance of "[r]oad construction, street cleaning or repair." 14 M.R.S. § 8104-A(4). This exception to immunity provides…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 8105Limitation on damagesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. Limit established. In any claim or cause of action permitted by this chapter, the award of damages, including costs, against either a governmental entity or its employees, or both, may not exceed $400,000 for any and all claims arising out of a single occurrence. 1-A. Limit established for out-of-state transit district or regional transportation corporation. 2. Costs. Court costs, prejudgment interest and all other costs that a court may assess must be included within the damage limit specified by this section. Accrued post-judgment interest may not be included within the damage limit. 3. Claims in excess of limit. When a claimant or several claimants believe they may have a claim against the State in excess of the limit established in subsection 1, or for a claim for which the State is immune, they may apply to the Legislature for special authorization to proceed within another specified limit. 4. Apportionment of claims.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tolliver v. Department of Transportation (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2008, 948 A.2d 1223)“…d against MDOT to $400,000, the maximum amount permitted by 14 M.R.S. § 8105. We vacate the judgment. I. BACKGR…”
- Michael Fortin v. Jacob Titcomb (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2013, 60 A.3d 765)“…ges are instead determined by the greater amount allowed by 14 M.R.S. § 8105(1) or 14 M.R.S. § 8116. Title 14 M.R.S.…”
- Rippett v. Bemis (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1996, 672 A.2d 82)“…against a “government entity” may include punitive damages. 14 M.R.S.A. § 8105(5) (1980). “Government entity,” however…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 8110Limitation of actionsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Every claim against a governmental entity or its employees permitted under this chapter is forever barred from the courts of this State, unless an action therein is begun within 2 years after the cause of action accrues, except that, if the claimant is a minor when the cause of action accrues, the action may be brought within 2 years of the minor's attaining 18 years of age. [PL 2001, c. 249, §2 (AMD).]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 44 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McLaughlin v. Superintending School Committee (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2003, 832 A.2d 782)“…from the date the cause of action accrued. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (2003). The Act is unambiguous. Accordi…”
- Couturier v. Penobscot Indian Nation (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1988, 544 A.2d 306)“…ourt determined that plaintiffs’ suit was time barred under 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (1980), the two-year statute of limitat…”
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 1987, 535 A.2d 421)“…wo-year limitations period relied on by the Superior Court. 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110. Plaintiff argues, however, that under…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 18-C: PROBATE CODE, Part 8: GENERAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING PROBATE AND NONPROBATE TRANSFERS
§ 2-807Actions for wrongful deathIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
1. Liability notwithstanding death. Whenever the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, then the person or the corporation that would have been liable if death had not ensued is liable for damages as provided in this section, notwithstanding the death of the person injured and although the death was caused under circumstances that amount to a felony. 2. Wrongful death action; damages; limitations. Every wrongful death action must be brought by and in the name of the personal representative or special administrator of the deceased person, and is distributable, after payment for funeral expenses and the costs of recovery including attorney's fees, directly to the decedent's heirs without becoming part of the probate estate, except as may be specifically provided in this subsection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Also relied on in: Maine Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines & Who Can Sue
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 14 M.R.S. § 8107: Maine Tort Claims Act, Notice of Claim(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 14 M.R.S. § 752: 6-Year General Civil Limitations Period(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 14 M.R.S. § 156: Comparative Negligence(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- Budzko v. One City Center Associates, 2001 ME 37, 767 A.2d 310(law.justia.com)
- 18-C M.R.S. § 2-807: Wrongful Death, 3-Year Limitations Period(legislature.maine.gov)
- 14 M.R.S. § 8110: Maine Tort Claims Act, 2-Year Limitation of Actions(legislature.maine.gov)
- 14 M.R.S. § 8104-A: Maine Tort Claims Act, Exceptions to Governmental Immunity(legislature.maine.gov)
- 14 M.R.S. § 8105: Maine Tort Claims Act, $400,000 Limit on Damages(legislature.maine.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.